Hi Thomas, Brill, that sounds exactly like it. I can't quite tell though - does the generator "source-hybrid" work yet? I.e. The bug's still open because there's some assembly required?
Thanks John On 14/09/2010 08:25, "thron7" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On 09/14/2010 08:29 AM, John Spackman wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Re: "One big build file" - when you develop on a local disk, this is >>much >> less relevant than when you use a web server backend. There are over >>400 >> files in an average application and each one causes a request to the >> server; if I refresh the app I'm working on now there are 474 requests, >> 99% of which are "304 not modified" responses. >> >> This adds up to 15 seconds of network comms for source builds, and is >> frustrating - in this case it would be much better to have all Qx >>scripts >> as a single or a few files (ideally defined by config.json). > >What you want is http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008, >but mind that this is *not* the same as working with a tools-free >version of qooxdoo. > >T. > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---- >Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >and start using them to simplify application deployment and >accelerate your shift to cloud computing. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >_______________________________________________ >qooxdoo-devel mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
