The exchange has become rather heated and it would certainly be a good idea to step back a bit. The theme of the discussion is already familiar and has been discussed before. There is no use in a war over the definition of "open source" and "community". As to the latter, I am "community" as well without having the kind of problems others seem to have with the current state of qooxdoo. People have all kinds of expectations and use cases and often one mistakes one's own position to reflect the "community's" position.
What we have is a software development infrastructure that "just works", with an excellent support. It is stable, useful and free. What more, alas, can you expect? What is the concrete, realistic, empirically measurable benefit people expect from making it "more open", what does this mean *in practice*? I really don't understand. C. -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/off-topic-Qooxdoo-s-ecossystem-question-tp5516947p5530670.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
