The LC-PCC Policy Statement 2.8.6.6 says:
1. Supply a date of publication that corresponds to the copyright date, in
square brackets, if it seems reasonable to assume that date is a likely
publication date.
If you supply a probable date, then you don't need to record the copyright
date, although you certainly can. So with a c2005 date on your piece, you
would do either:
264 _1 $c [2005]
Type of date: s
Dates: 2005,####
or you could do:
264 _1 $c [2005]
264 _4 $c (c)2005
Type of date: t
Dates: 2005, 2005
The LC-PCC PS also says:
2. If the copyright date is for the year following the year in which the
publication is received, supply a date of publication that corresponds to
the copyright date.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
asch...@u.washington.edu
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Snow, Karen wrote:
I've done a little searching and can't find the answer, so I am hoping the
collective wisdom can help me out...
If you use [date of publication not identified] in 264_1 $c and you have a
copyright date in 264_4 (let's say 2005), how would this look in DtSt and Dates
fixed fields?
DtSt = t
Dates = uuuu, 2005
?????
Thanks in advance for your help,
Karen
Karen Snow, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Graduate School of Library & Information Science
Dominican University
7900 West Division Street
River Forest, IL 60305
ks...@dom.edu
708-524-6077 (office)
708-524-6657 (fax)
