Jack Wu <j...@franciscan.edu> wrote: > I've always learned that a fictitious character is just that, a figment > of our imagination. It is not capable of authorship (or as creator) unless > it's a pseudonym of some real person. I can understand Holmes, Sherlock > getting an access point, but cannot understand it as the Preferred access > point. >
Another way to think about it is to consider the "identity" as being responsible for the work, not the flesh-and-blook human being bearing that name (real or pseudonymous). -- Mark K. Ehlert Minitex <http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>
