You're going to have to be a lot more specific than that to gain any converts.  Are we expected to believe that scientists who have devoted their lives to evolutionary biology have kept their doubts to themselves?  Or is the claim that scientists who have specialized in other areas have their doubts?  As someone who is married to a scientist, in science, the area of one's expertise means a lot.  Indeed, I would put no credence into even a biological scientist's concerns about evolution if he has not been testing the hypotheses him or herself.
 
And let's be very clear --  this is not a debate between believers and atheists.  There are plenty of believers who do not think intelligent design is scientific and who think evolution is the best science there is on the origins of human life.
 
Marci
 
 
In a message dated 8/3/2005 11:46:08 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Phil can tell you that there are lots of reputable scientists who have remained in the closet for fear of career suicide with their doubts about Darwin and their support for ID.
 
Cheers, Rick
 
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to