Or even unused traditional UHF TV channels which are only 30 MHz higher. The bad part of this is if something goes to court, the jury will likely side with those protecting lives over "ham chat" no matter what the laws say and the hams will lose.
Joe M. Richard wrote: > > > Since they'd be competing with high powered repeaters and government > radars, I thought 2.4 gig would have been a better choice than 70cm, but > that's just me... > > Richard > www.n7tgb.net <http://www.n7tgb.net/> > > Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. > -- Ronald Reagan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *DCFluX > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM > *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm > Band > > > > Take that crap up to 2.4 GHz with the rest of the garbage. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2720 - Release Date: 03/03/10 > 02:34:00 >
