What? Just go and turn on your PL... come on! Lets use the technology that we
claim we know so well...
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Raker
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
So... is anyone gonna buy one of these things to see just what kind of
interference it will actually make in the 70cm band? 1 watt max and .25 watt
nominal is enough to key up a poorly tuned and set up nearby repeater or a
distant sensitively configured repeater, and enough to produce decent QRM on
existing nearby voice and data communications especially as it is using an
analog video and operational control system.
-Brian / KF4ZWZ
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Richard <gbis-reply-...@gbis.com> wrote:
Since they'd be competing with high powered repeaters and government
radars, I thought 2.4 gig would have been a better choice than 70cm, but that's
just me...
Richard
www.n7tgb.net
Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.
-- Ronald Reagan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of DCFluX
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Take that crap up to 2.4 GHz with the rest of the garbage.
