At 05:46 PM 08/29/10, you wrote: >Re: MSR-2000 Alignment Metering > > > Probably looks a lot like the one at the top of the web page > > at <http://www.repeater-builder.com/msr2000/msr2000-index.html> > >There's an error on the above mentioned web page. > > > "In other words, YOU CANNOT USE A MODERN DVM TO PROPERLY > > TUNE AN MSR2000." > >I don't agree, in fact it's much easier for me to use my >Fluke DMM to detect some of the very small meter peaks and >dips. There is no rule or requirement the metering points >have to be loaded by a 50uA movement. > >Erratic metering with low cost Digital Multi Meters is probably >the result of the price you paid. > >"If it's a good meter, it must be a Fluke". > >cheers, >s.
I heard it on TV as "If it works it must be a Fluke". Mine is a Fluke 73 type III. What wording would you suggest? I wrote that the way I did because I have always had better results with either a Moto test set or a analog VOM (i.e. Simpson 260 or Triplett 630). Mike
