On Thursday 05 Aug 2004 22:53, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > BTW, Chris, Laurent Montel (from KDE) has suggested it might be useful to > make this patch available from the homepage (or make another realease, but > I don't think it's quite worth it).
Stick it in a package on the SourceForge download page if you want. Since you have to go there to download RG anyway, I don't see any point in making it any more visible than that. Is anyone using gcc-3.4.1 and Qt-3.3 apart from KDE developers and a few overkeen early adopters? Do any distros include Qt 3.3 yet? I had an email from one of the Arch Linux ports people who apparently use this combination, but it looks like they have their own ports tree anyway and are knowingly bleeding-edge about it. Doesn't sound like the sort of thing to get in a flap about, to me. I'm more bothered by whether fixes like these will break a build with Qt 3.1 -- which I can't test now but will report on next week when I'm back in the office. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
