I think it really depends what the implications of 'trying out' GC - I've
got no experience using GC in C++ but plenty with languages that do
implement it behind the scenes and of course I love it because I'm
inherently lazy. I assume that potentially mixing and matching GC and
non-GC code would be a bad idea - but the idea of going all GC would surely
be a huge piece of work?
R
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Ted Felix <[email protected]> wrote:
> > But IMO garbage collection still has a lot to offer us.
>
> I have no experience with garbage collection, but I would be
> concerned about something that can be unpredictable in a time-critical
> system like rosegarden. My impression is that near-real-time and
> garbage collection do not mix.
>
> Ted.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Rosegarden-devel mailing list
> [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
