On 07/13/2017 06:30 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to achieve ?
@graeme: maybe you could mock up what you are wanting/expecting from this
particular situation? that way we (TINW) could compare the two and see the
difference??
--
NOTE: No
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-07-12 15:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
You can't. There are no provisions for this.
I usually make the differences clear in the node.
Thanks Michael. I've been playing around with fpdoc and trying a few things
and then reviewing
On 2017-07-12 15:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
You can't. There are no provisions for this.
I usually make the differences clear in the node.
Thanks Michael. I've been playing around with fpdoc and trying a few
things and then reviewing the results. Attached is the output I have
thus
On 2017-07-12 15:19, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
ps #1:
I haven't tried documenting function results yet, so not sure what
FPDOC is going to do with that in this output.
I had a look at documenting function results. There seems to be a bug
(or place for improvement) in the HTML output. Even
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
How do you document overloaded functions? In this case I have overloaded
functions that have different parameters (obviously), but also different
result types.
You can't. There are no provisions for this.
I usually make the differences
