Guy Smith wrote:
> I'm stumped. I downloaded and installed Apache 1.3.14, OpenSSL 0.9.6,
> followed the installation instructions, copied pertinent parts of my
> existing (non-SSL) server conf file, and . . .
> httpsd fails to start. No messages in the log file (despite LogLevel being
> set to '
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 09:39:27PM -0800, Guy Smith wrote:
> I'm stumped. I downloaded and installed Apache 1.3.14, OpenSSL 0.9.6,
> followed the installation instructions, copied pertinent parts of my
> existing (non-SSL) server conf file, and . . .
>
> httpsd fails to start. No messages in th
I'm stumped. I downloaded and installed Apache 1.3.14, OpenSSL 0.9.6,
followed the installation instructions, copied pertinent parts of my
existing (non-SSL) server conf file, and . . .
httpsd fails to start. No messages in the log file (despite LogLevel being
set to 'debug'). No core files.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jan Dries
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 3:01 PM
>
> You did type the passphrase twice, did you, despite the fact that Apache
> asked for it only once?. It typically hangs (or appears to do so) if you
You did type the passphrase twice, did you, despite the fact that Apache
asked for it only once?. It typically hangs (or appears to do so) if you
don't type it twice. It's a bug that has been discussed in this more
than once, and although patches have been suggested, the bug is still
there in the
Full_Name: German Staltari
Version: 2.6.2
OS: Red Hat Linux PRO 6.2
Submission from: (NULL) (200.41.237.237)
I have this entries in my ssl_engine_log file :
[15/ene/2001 18:29:38 29487] [error] SSL error on reading data (OpenSSL library
error follows)
[15/ene/2001 18:29:38 29487] [error] OpenSS
Check the OpenSSL archives... it is to do with the cypher you have...
SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXP56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP
SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown downgrade-1.0
force-response-1.0
Have a read of the modssl FAQ.
|+
Hi there,
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Doremus, Matthew wrote:
> Is this to say that an underlying memory allocator would return an address
> from the malloc function of memory which had previously been allocated by
> another process ? This seems to be somewhat chaotic for any memory
> allocation, shar
>On Fri, Jan 12, 2001, Doremus, Matthew wrote:
>
>> I have been looking through the mod_ssl v7.2.1 SHMHT code and it
>appears
>> that each server creates it's own hash table in the allocated
shared >memory.
>> Does this imply that when using SHMHT servers on
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> The answer to your questions depends very much on what you wish to protect.
> If you are only interested in protecting the user's login details, then you
> could use SSL for just that (Yahoo! mail does something like this when you
> request "secure" login"). Obviously
10 matches
Mail list logo