On Jul 16, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Scott Likens wrote:
Are you really saying you can't compare a Ruby app with a LAMP app?
That's ridiculous. How else can someone decide between Typo and MT
and WP and etc?
No, you're just wrong. It makes PERFECT sense to compare the
experience of setting up and
On Jul 16, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Kevin Williams wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Chet Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Why on earth would you need to run a second web server? That seems
like a
really bad idea, frankly, hence my annoyance that the most obvious
question
(which boils down
is there anyway to write a ruby page that uses the selected
sidebars/theme in typo ?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
Typo-list mailing list
Typo-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, JZ wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Scott Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2) Mongrel/Webrick
>
> Nginx with proxy load balancer to cluster of Thin/Ebb (+unix socket)
> processes is a much faster.
A bit overkill for 99.9% of all blogs, though.
--
_Deirdre blo
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Chet Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why on earth would you need to run a second web server? That seems like a
> really bad idea, frankly, hence my annoyance that the most obvious question
> (which boils down to "WTF?", essentially) isn't addressed.
Let's co
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Scott Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If thin supported Streaming (Not Media, but the Mongrel Extension) it would
> be something I would have no issue using. I've mentioned that to the author
> of Thin and we'll see how that goes.
>
Thin depends on the event
On Jul 16, 2008, at 5:09 PM, JZ wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Scott Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To whomever it may concern,
I notice the common thread here. How to deploy typo?
There is many ways to deploy typo, the most common is
1) FastCGI.
We all know, it sucks.
It su
On Jul 16, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Chet Farmer wrote:
Scott,
You persist in answering questions that I'm not asking. At this
point, I won't give a damn about Typo deployment again until some
time *after* the bug fixes I require are deployed, if then.
Your ongoing insistence that Typo/Ruby IS
On Jul 16, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Chet Farmer wrote:
We are comparing an Apple to a Pear, LAMP is not the same as LAMR
or a Ruby on Rails install. Please stop comparing it, you are
doing nothing useful by doing that.
Are you really saying you can't compare a Ruby app with a LAMP app?
That's r
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Scott Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To whomever it may concern,
> I notice the common thread here. How to deploy typo?
>
> There is many ways to deploy typo, the most common is
> 1) FastCGI.
We all know, it sucks.
> 2) Mongrel/Webrick
Nginx with proxy loa
Scott,
You persist in answering questions that I'm not asking. At this point,
I won't give a damn about Typo deployment again until some time
*after* the bug fixes I require are deployed, if then.
Your ongoing insistence that Typo/Ruby IS TOO! easy to set up and run
is, well, tiresome. P
On Jul 16, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Scott Likens wrote:
Honestly, all of it. I know that's a broad answer, but it's the
truth. Compare the installation experience of a LAMP stack tool to
Typo's and you'll see the huge gap.
In particular, deeper descriptions of why Mongrel needs to be
involved, w
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Chet Farmer wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Scott Likens wrote:
Which portion of the documentation needs to be revised? FastCGI?
Mongrel?
Honestly, all of it. I know that's a broad answer, but it's the
truth. Compare the installation experience of a LAMP
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:38 AM, Chet Farmer wrote:
Beats me. Perhaps you should refer to the first portion of my reply
to you last night.
It's clearly a problem, though. It's also a problem that the purpose
of Mongrel isn't made clear; you just have to take on faith that
it's something you n
On Jul 16, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Rodger Donaldson wrote:
Why is mod_proxy working with mongrel such an exercise?
That's it as a whole, 7 whole lines. Add that to your apache
configuration in a Virtualhost area for your blog and startup typo
and you should be golden.
At which point you wonder
Scott Likens wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Rodger Donaldson wrote:
Chet Farmer wrote:
Now, there's no real difference with Mongrel/Webrick if you run
nginx or Apache or lighttpd. It works, it's well documented and
takes the most amount of memory (actually all of them really take
the
Chet Farmer wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:10 AM, Scott Likens wrote:
I'll certainly agree with that. Getting mongrel working with
mod_proxy was essentially an exercise in Google and reading blogs.
Why is mod_proxy working with mongrel such an exercise?
Beats me. Perhaps you should refer t
Le 16 juil. 08 à 15:43, Chet Farmer a écrit :
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Scott Likens wrote:
Which portion of the documentation needs to be revised? FastCGI?
Mongrel?
Honestly, all of it. I know that's a broad answer, but it's the
truth. Compare the installation experience of a LAMP sta
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Scott Likens wrote:
Which portion of the documentation needs to be revised? FastCGI?
Mongrel?
Honestly, all of it. I know that's a broad answer, but it's the truth.
Compare the installation experience of a LAMP stack tool to Typo's and
you'll see the huge gap.
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:10 AM, Scott Likens wrote:
I'll certainly agree with that. Getting mongrel working with
mod_proxy was essentially an exercise in Google and reading blogs.
Why is mod_proxy working with mongrel such an exercise?
Beats me. Perhaps you should refer to the first portion
On Jul 16, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Rodger Donaldson wrote:
Chet Farmer wrote:
Now, there's no real difference with Mongrel/Webrick if you run
nginx or Apache or lighttpd. It works, it's well documented and
takes the most amount of memory (actually all of them really take
the same amount of me
Chet,
Which portion of the documentation needs to be revised? FastCGI?
Mongrel? I suppose someone can whip up some instructions on how to
make the config.ru for Passenger if need be. Typo is imo extremely
easy to deploy and get up in running in under 5 minutes. If your
having a problem
Chet Farmer wrote:
Now, there's no real difference with Mongrel/Webrick if you run nginx
or Apache or lighttpd. It works, it's well documented and takes the
most amount of memory (actually all of them really take the same
amount of memory, you just don't see the ruby process hanging around
us
23 matches
Mail list logo