Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-26 Thread Atte Andre Jensen

On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jack Campin wrote:

  Well, after keeping it secret for ages (copyright, you know), I might as
  well hit you with this one:
  http://home.wanadoo.nl/atte/songbook
  Any comments welcome, esp if anyone has an idea on how to legalize the
  site.

 Looks like good stuff from what I've been able to make of it so far.

Thanks!

 Problems:

Ok, here we go :-)

 (1) you've used immensely long filenames, so tar on the Mac can't
 extract all of them.  I ended up hand-editing the tar lines and
 the null characters out of the archive to turn it into a single
 ABC file containing all the tunes.  I suspect Windows users would
 hit similar difficulties.

One solution is to use .abc filenames and then always extracting
the title information (for the display around the site) from the T:.
That's entirely possible, even pretty nice, only thing is that it's quite
a bit slower for on-the-fly generation of my pages. Or I could provide a
tarball (also looking into providing compressed formats for other
platforms, although I believe most platforms can handle tarballs, or?)
with short filenames. Might be a bit tricky, since you cannot trust a
to-8-char truncation of my long filename will give unique filenames...
Other possibilities?

 (2) there are some non-ASCII characters used in the chords - F8 and B0.
 What do these represent?

o-slash (for m7b5) and superscripted-o (for dim). But they do show up in
the pdf/ps outputs, right?

 (3) there are quite a few abcm2ps-isms which need to be edited out to
 get BarFly to handle the file: the multivoice syntax (no way round
 that, I guess)

Nope. Problem is that if you have a wholenote and want two chords to the
bar, there's no way for standard abc to but the chords nicely.

 and the !fine! exclamation-point abuse (bleurgh, no
 excuse there, dump it).

Then I guess I should avoid repeats alltogether, since I use the !fine!
to indicate where the form actually ends... Hmmm... Maybe you're right,
have to think it over...

  I assume Muse would need something similar
 to BarFly.  Most of the material doesn't really need to have the
 chords separated into a different voice, and many more programs
 could handle your tunes if you provided a zipped-together version.



 (4) there are no tempi.  I've been trying to play Ask me now on the
 alto recorder (interesting piece, gets the fingers doing new things)
 but it's not on the only Monk record I've got and I can imagine it
 going equally well at almost any speed.  What's the right one?

A walking ballad round 1/4=120. I though about putting tempi i the tunes,
but I hate to see it in the ps-output. Don't know if it's possible to make
abcm2ps not output the tempo (?) otherwise I should just strip the Q: line
before sending to abcmp2s.

 (5) what on earth is going on in Five?  Are the chords in 4/4 with
 the melody in 5/4?  If so there are much easier ways to write it.

Do you know the tune? It's an extremely difficult tune to play since
everything is 5 over 4. The bass/drums play in 4/4 throughout, but the
theme is having 5 notes to the bar. In the bridge this is even taken one
step further with the 5-notes-a-bar is grouped in four note groups with a
chord change on every first note in the four note group. This is the way
to notate it...

 Legalization: I can't see any way round telling the publishers of each
 piece what you're up to and asking *them* what they want to happen.  And
 I'm not sure that can be done without sending some of them off on a trawl
 across the entire Web looking for ABC files that might be convertible
 into invoices.  At some point that's going to happen anyway but we better
 be prepared for it.

I guess the legalization is a pretty huge task, that I have to look into
at one point if this site should stay online... Not the higest priority
for me right now, though.

Thanks alot for your comments, I'd look into the possibilities next week
(vacation) and maybe I could mail you offlist to get comments on my
changes?

Regards
-- 
l8er
Atte

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-26 Thread Atte Andre Jensen

On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Atte Andre Jensen wrote:

 On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jack Campin wrote:
   I assume Muse would need something similar
  to BarFly.  Most of the material doesn't really need to have the
  chords separated into a different voice, and many more programs
  could handle your tunes if you provided a zipped-together version.

How does different platforms handle tarballs anyways? (You did did find
the slightly hidden (at the bottom of the songs page) tarball with all
tunes in abc, right?)

My idea behind using the same two voice approach to all tunes is that

1) Although a certain tune can be set within the standard, I often find
mysel adding alternate chords later where I suddenly need My Hack. So
might as well to it from the beginning

2) All tunes follow the same conventions which for instance means that:

3) It is more easy to extract the correct voices (using abcselect), for
the different types of output.

I might note that this site started as you regular
a-bunch-of-100%-standard-abc-files-+-a-tarball-site, but my visitors often
didn't want to know about abc or just needed a specific tune (often
transposed), so I broke away. I would love to have everything as standard
abc, but since that won't do what I need, I found the best (for my
purpose) abc'er around which is abcm2ps, stuck to that, and used what it
can do. Maybe my site is not a real abc site, but a songbook-site that can
output abcm2ps type of abc. So what? My visitors need the pdf's more than
the abc, so the abc is more of an internal format.

Regards
-- 
l8er
Atte

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-26 Thread Jack Campin

 How does different platforms handle tarballs anyways? (You did did find
 the slightly hidden (at the bottom of the songs page) tarball with all
 tunes in abc, right?)

I used two programs in succession: Stuffit Expander and then Tar (a Mac
port of the Unix utility).  The problem was that Tar doesn't have a way
to rename files on the fly to fit them within MacOS naming restrictions,
and just omitted those that it couldn't make names for, so in the end
I just left the tunes all in one file; more convenient on my platform
anyway.

(This led to an interesting gotcha: tar file format uses lots of null
characters, and not all Macintosh text editors make them visible - BarFly
doesn't.  I thought I'd cleaned up the file after removing visible tar
instructions, but BarFly kept crashing in weird ways.  It turned out
there were still 26,000 null characters in the file; everything worked
fine once I removed them).

The F: field ought to be usable here; think up a filename for each tune
(since you're doing it you can guarantee uniqueness), preferably within
8+3 conventions, put it in an F: field in the header for each tune, and
have your archiver use that instead of the real filename you use locally.

I think that for all non-Unix systems having all the tunes in one file
is going to be easier than one-tune-per-file anyway, so perhaps there's
no need to do more than concatenate.


 My idea behind using the same two voice approach to all tunes is that

 1) Although a certain tune can be set within the standard, I often find
 mysel adding alternate chords later where I suddenly need My Hack. So
 might as well to it from the beginning

 2) All tunes follow the same conventions which for instance means that:

 3) It is more easy to extract the correct voices (using abcselect), for
 the different types of output.

Good reasons, I wasn't suggesting you abandon this practice.  But does
abcselect give you a way of creating a one-voice file from what you've
got, in cases where you wouldn't lose anything? - if so it would help
people with less flexible software to provide such an alternative.


 (2) there are some non-ASCII characters used in the chords - F8 and B0.
 What do these represent?
 o-slash (for m7b5) and superscripted-o (for dim).  But they do show up
 in the pdf/ps outputs, right?

I don't have an abc-to-PS generator; the current Mac port of abc2ps
needs more memory than there is on any machine I have regular access
to - didn't think to download your PDFs to check.


 !fine! exclamation-point abuse
 Then I guess I should avoid repeats alltogether, since I use the !fine!
 to indicate where the form actually ends...

There are two ways to do it: use P: in the header so player software
gets the order right, and use the more-standard textual annotation method
of ^Fine to get the screen/print display correct in a portable way.
I often use both at once (and have to since BarFly doesn't print the
playing order).

ABC's P: construct doesn't quite work with your tunes, since you have
A parts that are nearly but not exactly repeated.  Makes perfect musical
sense to label them both the same but an ABC player isn't going to see it
that way.  It would be ideal if you could use part labels like A - reprise
and expect the player software to understand it.  I don't think any player
can yet handle multi-character part labels in header P: fields.


 I thought about putting tempi in the tunes, but I hate to see it in the
 ps-output. Don't know if it's possible to make abcm2ps not output the
 tempo (?) otherwise I should just strip the Q: line before sending to
 abcmp2s.

This is one of BarFly's most annoying features too; a bit sneakier because
it won't print the tempo in the header but insists on printing changes of
tempo (the worst of both worlds) directly in ABC syntax.  Having the Q:
field commented out so only humans could read it would be a reasonable
compromise.

=== http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/ ===


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



RE: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-26 Thread Karl Dallas

I had no problem unzipping the tar file with Winzip, and the long
filenames were preserved. However, everything played very fast because
my system didn't understand a medium tempo. I hand-edited the files to
set the tempo to a speed that made sense (usually 120) and then they
played OK. I've also downloaded them on to my Handspring Treo
PDA/cellphone (Palm OS).

--

Karl Dallas, HoustonMedia
Please note new email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tel: +44(0)771 980 5907

Publishers of the jTechUpdate (Java), RUXPerienced (Windows XP), KD on
jazz and KD on folk mailing lists.

. To subscribe send email with 'subscribe' in the Subject field to 
. jTechUpdate: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. RUXPerienced: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. HardwareDaily: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. SoftwareDaily: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. KD on jazz: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. KD on folk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atte Andre
Jensen
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jack Campin wrote:

  Well, after keeping it secret for ages (copyright, you know), I
might as
  well hit you with this one:
  http://home.wanadoo.nl/atte/songbook
  Any comments welcome, esp if anyone has an idea on how to legalize
the
  site.

 Looks like good stuff from what I've been able to make of it so far.

Thanks!

 Problems:

Ok, here we go :-)

 (1) you've used immensely long filenames, so tar on the Mac can't
 extract all of them.  I ended up hand-editing the tar lines and
 the null characters out of the archive to turn it into a single
 ABC file containing all the tunes.  I suspect Windows users would
 hit similar difficulties.

One solution is to use .abc filenames and then always extracting
the title information (for the display around the site) from the T:.
That's entirely possible, even pretty nice, only thing is that it's
quite
a bit slower for on-the-fly generation of my pages. Or I could provide a
tarball (also looking into providing compressed formats for other
platforms, although I believe most platforms can handle tarballs, or?)
with short filenames. Might be a bit tricky, since you cannot trust a
to-8-char truncation of my long filename will give unique filenames...
Other possibilities?

 (2) there are some non-ASCII characters used in the chords - F8 and
B0.
 What do these represent?

o-slash (for m7b5) and superscripted-o (for dim). But they do show up in
the pdf/ps outputs, right?

 (3) there are quite a few abcm2ps-isms which need to be edited out to
 get BarFly to handle the file: the multivoice syntax (no way round
 that, I guess)

Nope. Problem is that if you have a wholenote and want two chords to the
bar, there's no way for standard abc to but the chords nicely.

 and the !fine! exclamation-point abuse (bleurgh, no
 excuse there, dump it).

Then I guess I should avoid repeats alltogether, since I use the !fine!
to indicate where the form actually ends... Hmmm... Maybe you're right,
have to think it over...

  I assume Muse would need something similar
 to BarFly.  Most of the material doesn't really need to have the
 chords separated into a different voice, and many more programs
 could handle your tunes if you provided a zipped-together version.



 (4) there are no tempi.  I've been trying to play Ask me now on the
 alto recorder (interesting piece, gets the fingers doing new
things)
 but it's not on the only Monk record I've got and I can imagine it
 going equally well at almost any speed.  What's the right one?

A walking ballad round 1/4=120. I though about putting tempi i the
tunes,
but I hate to see it in the ps-output. Don't know if it's possible to
make
abcm2ps not output the tempo (?) otherwise I should just strip the Q:
line
before sending to abcmp2s.

 (5) what on earth is going on in Five?  Are the chords in 4/4 with
 the melody in 5/4?  If so there are much easier ways to write it.

Do you know the tune? It's an extremely difficult tune to play since
everything is 5 over 4. The bass/drums play in 4/4 throughout, but the
theme is having 5 notes to the bar. In the bridge this is even taken one
step further with the 5-notes-a-bar is grouped in four note groups with
a
chord change on every first note in the four note group. This is the way
to notate it...

 Legalization: I can't see any way round telling the publishers of each
 piece what you're up to and asking *them* what they want to happen.
And
 I'm not sure that can be done without sending some of them off on a
trawl
 across the entire Web looking for ABC files that might be convertible
 into invoices.  At some point that's going to happen anyway but we
better
 be prepared for it.

I guess the legalization is a pretty huge task, that I have to look into
at one point if this site should stay online... Not the higest priority
for me right now

Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-25 Thread Jack Campin

 Well, after keeping it secret for ages (copyright, you know), I might as
 well hit you with this one:
 http://home.wanadoo.nl/atte/songbook
 Any comments welcome, esp if anyone has an idea on how to legalize the
 site.

Looks like good stuff from what I've been able to make of it so far.

Problems:

(1) you've used immensely long filenames, so tar on the Mac can't
extract all of them.  I ended up hand-editing the tar lines and
the null characters out of the archive to turn it into a single
ABC file containing all the tunes.  I suspect Windows users would
hit similar difficulties.

(2) there are some non-ASCII characters used in the chords - F8 and B0.
What do these represent?

(3) there are quite a few abcm2ps-isms which need to be edited out to
get BarFly to handle the file: the multivoice syntax (no way round
that, I guess) and the !fine! exclamation-point abuse (bleurgh, no
excuse there, dump it).  I assume Muse would need something similar
to BarFly.  Most of the material doesn't really need to have the
chords separated into a different voice, and many more programs
could handle your tunes if you provided a zipped-together version.

(4) there are no tempi.  I've been trying to play Ask me now on the
alto recorder (interesting piece, gets the fingers doing new things)
but it's not on the only Monk record I've got and I can imagine it
going equally well at almost any speed.  What's the right one?

(5) what on earth is going on in Five?  Are the chords in 4/4 with
the melody in 5/4?  If so there are much easier ways to write it.

Legalization: I can't see any way round telling the publishers of each
piece what you're up to and asking *them* what they want to happen.  And
I'm not sure that can be done without sending some of them off on a trawl
across the entire Web looking for ABC files that might be convertible
into invoices.  At some point that's going to happen anyway but we better
be prepared for it.




-
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data  recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-24 Thread John Chambers

Atte writes:
| On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, John Chambers wrote:
|  Do you know how to make hidden web pages? I checked, and found that
|  home.wanadoo.nl  is a unix machine running apache.  On such a server,
|  it's really easy to put things on the web so  that  only  people  who
|  know the URL can find them.  Some studies have concluded that between
|  40% and 50% of the web is hidden in this way, visible only to members
|  of an inside group.
| 
|  If you don't know how to do it, I could explain it.
|
| Please to, but can I have a guess? 1) don't put metatags out for the
| search engines and 2) don't tell anybody...

Nah; nothing so sophisticated.  I wrote a doc on the subject:
  http://trillian.mit.edu/~jc/doc/HiddenWeb.html

This was in response to a big study which concluded that around  half
the  online pages were hidden simply by being inaccessible from the
public collection of web pages. I was surprised to learn that a lot
of  people  didn't  know  about  this, or thought there was something
underhanded about it.  So I wrote up a little doc on how to do it.

And note that there's nothing tricky or suspicious here; it's part of
the intentional design of web servers. There are many reasons someone
might want web pages to be hidden.  For example, you are working on a
web  site, and don't want to release it to the general public.  But
you want to test it from web browsers to make  sure  that  everything
works.   So  you hide it during development.  Then you add a single
link from a public page to release it to the Web.

The don't tell anybody is accurate.  Your clique will want to  keep
its  URLs  a  secret.   This  is mostly to keep the search sites from
finding your stuff and advertising it to the world.

|  What you should do is pass the word among other jazz  musicians,  and
|  get  them  thinking  about  an online fake book that's available from
|  anywhere there's a machine with a web browser. If you can get a small
|  group  of them contributing tunes, you can have a full fake book in a
|  short time.  It sounds like a worthwhile project to me.
|
| Actually I tried that, most peoples excuse is how complex (?) abc seems to
| be. All these codes. And I must admit that I should really sit down and
| make a clear, working explanation on how to seup abc under windows. I get
| exhausted just thinking about it :-)

I've found that it helps  to  have  a  few  good  examples  that  are
formatted with lots of white space for readability, and don't use too
many of the more sophisticated abc features. Then I just show the abc
to people, and show how easy it is to read. This gets across the idea
that it's basically really simple, and they can do it.

Work up a few examples that use only the  two  octaves,  CDEFGAB  and
cdefgab,  simple  bar  lines and repeats, and of course chords (since
this is jazz).  Use only the X, T, C, M, L and K header lines.  Maybe
throw  in a few D lines.  Arrange the music to show phrasing clearly.
Print out a few copies to carry around.  You should be able to  teach
it to someone in a few minutes. They'll start using abc for their own
hand-scribbled tunes.  Try emailing them a few tunes, and  point  out
that they don't need any new abc software to read it, just their mail
reader.

The main problem is people who think you need complicated  GUI  tools
to  do  anything  on a computer.  Yeah; that's difficult.  But abc is
plain text.  You can write it with a pencil.  Typing tunes is  pretty
easy.   A  computer keyboard isn't as good as a musical keyboard, but
it's not all that bad.


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-24 Thread Laura Conrad

 John == John Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

John The don't tell anybody is accurate.  Your clique will want to  keep
John its  URLs  a  secret.   This  is mostly to keep the search sites from
John finding your stuff and advertising it to the world.

There's something else you want to do for that, and that's to tell the
robots not to index it if they do stumble on it.  You do this by
putting in the header a tag that says:

META NAME=robots CONTENT=index,nofollow

(or noindex, nofollow).  I assume this doesn't protect against spam
harvesters, but does result in your pages not being indexed by google.

-- 
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097  fax: (801) 365-6574 
233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-23 Thread John Chambers

Atte writes:
| On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Ulf wrote:
|   Any comments welcome, esp if anyone has an idea on how to legalize the site.
| 
|  Well, there might be a minor problem there.
|
| This will not go away :-) I might move it to a  new  secret  place,
| but I really need it to be online for myself.  Often I'm at school,
| and just before a rehersal somebody asks could we play this song.
| Although  it's  by  no means exhaustive, there are some of the more
| special songs I like to play (U.M.M.G, Asiatic Raes, The  touch  of
| your  lips  and  Oh! look at me now for instance) that are not in a
| lotta fake books.  And no, a lotta  super-basic-standards  are  not
| there - yet...

Yeah; that's pretty much my reasoning for starting my tune finder. It
was  pure personal self interest.  I wanted a fast way to find things
on all those abc sites that were out there,  and  I  figured  that  a
computer could do the search better than I could.  I've often used it
to find tunes fast when someone asks if I can play  something  for  a
particular gig.

Do you know how to make hidden web pages? I checked, and found that
home.wanadoo.nl  is a unix machine running apache.  On such a server,
it's really easy to put things on the web so  that  only  people  who
know the URL can find them.  Some studies have concluded that between
40% and 50% of the web is hidden in this way, visible only to members
of an inside group.

If you don't know how to do it, I could explain it.

|  Anyway, I might contribute with a song or two, I have a couple here too, might
|  make your collection more complete.
|
| Great, hit me :-)

What you should do is pass the word among other jazz  musicians,  and
get  them  thinking  about  an online fake book that's available from
anywhere there's a machine with a web browser. If you can get a small
group  of them contributing tunes, you can have a full fake book in a
short time.  It sounds like a worthwhile project to me.

What I've found helps is a bit of tongue-in-cheek humor.  I  like  to
tell people that there's a price to using my tune finder. You are now
required to type in a bunch of your favorite tunes  in  abc  and  put
them on a web site.  I can put them on my site for a while, until you
get your own web site.  This gets grins when I say it, but  it  works
often  enough.   Just  last week, one of the Balkan/Klezmer musicians
whose tunes I have had online sent me email with the URL of  his  new
online collection.

Anyway, if you pass the word and get musicians using your  site,  you
can  probably  get  contributions  from  some of them pretty quickly.
After someone has sent you a dozen tunes or so, you can suggest  that
they  might  want to make their own web site.  And if the online jazz
fake book is scattered across a lot of  sites,  the  publishers  will
have a lot of problems shutting it down.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-23 Thread Atte Andre Jensen

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, John Chambers wrote:

 Atte writes:
 | On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Ulf wrote:
 |   Any comments welcome, esp if anyone has an idea on how to legalize the site.
 | 
 |  Well, there might be a minor problem there.
 |
 | This will not go away :-) I might move it to a  new  secret  place,
 | but I really need it to be online for myself.  Often I'm at school,
 | and just before a rehersal somebody asks could we play this song.
 | Although  it's  by  no means exhaustive, there are some of the more
 | special songs I like to play (U.M.M.G, Asiatic Raes, The  touch  of
 | your  lips  and  Oh! look at me now for instance) that are not in a
 | lotta fake books.  And no, a lotta  super-basic-standards  are  not
 | there - yet...

 Yeah; that's pretty much my reasoning for starting my tune finder. It
 was  pure personal self interest.  I wanted a fast way to find things
 on all those abc sites that were out there,  and  I  figured  that  a
 computer could do the search better than I could.  I've often used it
 to find tunes fast when someone asks if I can play  something  for  a
 particular gig.

 Do you know how to make hidden web pages? I checked, and found that
 home.wanadoo.nl  is a unix machine running apache.  On such a server,
 it's really easy to put things on the web so  that  only  people  who
 know the URL can find them.  Some studies have concluded that between
 40% and 50% of the web is hidden in this way, visible only to members
 of an inside group.

 If you don't know how to do it, I could explain it.

Please to, but can I have a guess? 1) don't put metatags out for the
search engines and 2) don't tell anybody...

 |  Anyway, I might contribute with a song or two, I have a couple here too, might
 |  make your collection more complete.
 |
 | Great, hit me :-)

 What you should do is pass the word among other jazz  musicians,  and
 get  them  thinking  about  an online fake book that's available from
 anywhere there's a machine with a web browser. If you can get a small
 group  of them contributing tunes, you can have a full fake book in a
 short time.  It sounds like a worthwhile project to me.

Actually I tried that, most peoples excuse is how complex (?) abc seems to
be. All these codes. And I must admit that I should really sit down and
make a clear, working explanation on how to seup abc under windows. I get
exhausted just thinking about it :-)
-- 
l8er
Atte

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] jazz-songbook in abcformat

2002-04-19 Thread Atte Andre Jensen

On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Ulf wrote:

  Any comments welcome, esp if anyone has an idea on how to legalize the
  site.

 Well, there might be a minor problem there.

 You know how things went with www.lyrics.ch, a sad affair. I have grasped a
 vast number of lyrics from that server. Now it's gone...

This will not go away :-) I might move it to a new secret place, but I
really need it to be online for myself. Often I'm at school, and just
before a rehersal
somebody asks could we play this song. Although it's by no means
exhaustive, there are some of the more special songs I like to play
(U.M.M.G, Asiatic Raes, The touch of your lips and Oh! look at me now for
instance) that are not in alotta fake books. And no, a lotta
super-basic-standards are not there - yet...

 Anyway, I might contribute with a song or two, I have a couple here too, might
 make your collection more complete.

Great, hit me :-)

 One thing you can do is mention on your home page that the abc files exist.

Well that is mentioned, although not with capital letters. It started out
as a pure abc site, but the users (that would be my friends, fellow
musicians and students) mostly couldn't/wouldn't figure out how to get abc
running. So finally I decided to promote the pdf-versions most. For the
abc-files look at the bottom of the first page (songs).
--
l8er
Atte

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html