Re: [ActiveDir] Single Space in LDAP query dropped: Why?
Return Receipt Your Re: [ActiveDir] Single Space in LDAP query dropped: Why? document : was Sheik D. Badhusha/UNIOSIL received by: at: 19/08/2006 10:05:22 AM PDT List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
[ActiveDir] Rid Master
Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell I have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do) this just isn’t the place for it when people come here for help. /just sayin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akomolafe, Deji Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 10:58 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell Nah.it looks more like the sender mistook this list for some other lists. On other lists, this would have been a engendered more rapid-fire flame war to the sender's satisfaction, even though the joke itself is very old and has outlived its useful shelf life. I'm sure he's disappointed that this list is so geeky and full of maroons with no sense of humors. Sincerely, _ (, / | /) /) /) /---| (/_ __ ___// _ // _ ) / |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_ (_/ /) (/ Microsoft MVP - Directory Services www.akomolafe.com - we know IT -5.75, -3.23 Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon From: Laura A. Robinson Sent: Sun 9/3/2006 5:41 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell Okay, has anybody considered the possibility that this was an accident? I know I've accidentally sent mail to the wrong addresses before by letting autofill kick in an not paying attention to what actually got autofilled, and this seems like a very strange thing to send to this list intentionally. Laura -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master
Really a good stuff , Thanks for everyone Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 09:25 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master So, every security principal in AD has a SID, or a Security Identifier. This uniquely identifies the object within the scope of the domain. There are a few pieces of a SID for a security principal in the domain – among them are the domain SID and the RID. The domain SID identifies the domain which in SID speak is the issuing authority for that SID – if a computer needs to resolve that SID back to a principal this will lead it back to the domain. RID stands for Relative Identifier. This is the unique ID for the object in the domain. To guarantee uniqueness, one DC in the domain functions as a RID Master. The RID Master issues blocks of 500 RIDs to DCs on an as needed basis. Anytime you create an object on a DC, it allocates a RID to the object and that becomes a component of the SID. Here’s a link on this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=""> Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:11 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell I have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do) this just isn’t the place for it when people come here for help. /just
[ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery
Guys , another question One of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance Almeida Pinto, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 11:18 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master also see: RID Master FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx cheers,jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell I have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do) this just isn’t the place for it when people come here for help. /just sayin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akomolafe, Deji Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 10:58 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell Nah.it looks more like the sender mistook this list for some other lists. On other lists, this would have been a engendered more rapid-fire flame war to the sender's satisfaction, even though the joke itself is very old and has outlived its useful shelf life. I'm sure he's disappointed that this list is so geeky and full of maroons with no sense of
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery
I seized the domain, still the same problem any alternative solution , The other dc have becom other fsmo but not taking over RID role Robert Rutherford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/05/2006 05:18 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery Hi, Use NTDSUTIL http://support.microsoft.com/kb/255504/ Cheers Rob Robert Rutherford QuoStar Solutions Limited T: +44 (0) 8456 440 331 F: +44 (0) 8456 440 332 M: +44 (0) 7974 249 494 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.quostar.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 September 2006 13:03 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery Guys , another question One of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance Almeida Pinto, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 11:18 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master also see: RID Master FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx cheers,jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ActiveDir] need help
Guys i need to develop a programe which display the services in all the dc 's , any idea where i can find better help regarding or nay other alternative solution Thanks in advance Joe McNicholas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/15/2006 09:53 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject [ActiveDir] _vbscript_ Container Security I'm trying to create and secure the LDAP://cn=System Management,cn=System,dc=mydomain,dc=com container, as required for SMS[1]. I'm able to create the container successfully, but haven't found any examples of how to assign security to an OU or Container in the AD. MS Script Centre and a quick google have come up blank, can anyone point me to any examples? Thanks Joe [1] Ref: https://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sms/smssp2/spsecurity/3df7a6e2-e173-4def-a81a-5bd90fbbf9d8.mspx?mfr=true
[ActiveDir] migration help
Hi all I had a windows 2000 domain with 2 domain contraoller , 3 file servers , the users acoounts are spread across all the servers (ie the active directory accounts are added to file server directory security to assign access to users for folders and files). now i am installing new servers for windows 2003 and i want to migrate the users account from windows 2000 to windows 2003 . how to i do , what happend to the user acconts after migration , what happens to the users accounts added to file server. how to do i retain the same user acconts in the file server directory permissions. please give me a solution for a proper migration. Thanks in advance. Bdahusha.s.d. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [ActiveDir] migration help
Your right , basically i was thought of it . But company has bought Hp DL G4 servers for new windows 2003 dc , instead of Ml 530 , i have to use DL G4 servers for new installation . How do i proceed. Thanks - Original Message From: Almeida Pinto, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 11:24:39 AM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] migration help in your case I would suggest an UPGRADE of the domain to w2k3 AD instead of a migration to a NEW forest high-level steps are * use the W2K3 SP1 CD! * update schema (only needed to introduce w2k3 DCs, not needed for w2k3 member servers) * introduce w2k3 DCs * move stuff over from w2k DCs to w2k3 DCs * demote and decommission W2K DCs also see for additional information: http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2005/11/19/What-information-is-available-when-UPGRADING-from-W2K_2F00_E2K-to-W2K3-_2800_R2_29002F00_E2K3_3F00_.aspx Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards, Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto Senior Infrastructure Consultant MVP Windows Server - Directory Services LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven) ( Tel : +31-(0)40-29.57.777 ( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80 * E-mail : see sender address From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of badhusha sd Sent: Fri 2006-12-29 12:22 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] migration help Hi all I had a windows 2000 domain with 2 domain contraoller , 3 file servers , the users acoounts are spread across all the servers (ie the active directory accounts are added to file server directory security to assign access to users for folders and files). now i am installing new servers for windows 2003 and i want to migrate the users account from windows 2000 to windows 2003 . how to i do , what happend to the user acconts after migration , what happens to the users accounts added to file server. how to do i retain the same user acconts in the file server directory permissions. please give me a solution for a proper migration. Thanks in advance. Bdahusha.s.d. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
