Re: [ccp4bb] Removing a tight binding ligand

2010-10-08 Thread Joseph Ho
We often dialysis protein against charcoal to remove small molecules that
tightly bind to protein.

Meng-Chiao Joseph Ho, PhD
Department of Biochemistry
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
 Hi all,

 I am working with a substrate binding protein. The protein
 scavenges its endogenous ligand out of the E. coli used for
 expression. I need to get this ligand out for both
 crystallographic and kinetic studies. I have tried denaturing in
 urea and refolding the protein with limited success. It refolds
 properly according to the CD spectra but it some how manages to
 hold on to trace amounts of ligand despite serial dialysis (500ml
 to 5ml of sample) in 8M, 6M, 4M, 2M 1M urea followed by 50mM Tris.
 I also have a homolog that abjectly refuses to refold in either
 urea or guanidine, though it does turn the dialysis tubing into a
 lovely snow globe. There are alternative methods of performing the
 kinetics, but those will require destroying the protein which
 doesn't help on the crystallography front.

 I was wondering if any of you out there had experience
 successfully removing very tightly bound ligands by an alternative
 method. I didn't see any mention on the subject in the archives. I
 had hoped you might be able to point me in the right direction.

 Thanks for your time,

 Katherine

 Ph. D. candidate
 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
 College of Medicine
 University of Florida



Re: [ccp4bb] Removing a tight binding ligand

2010-10-08 Thread Mathews, Irimpan I.
Hi Katherine,

We had a case where we used saturating amounts of NaCl and precipitated the 
protein to get rid of a very tight binding ligand (Structure, 11, 677-690, 
2003;  look at the preparation of the apoenzyme section).

Regards,
Mathews


-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of 
SIPPEL,KATHERINE H
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 6:05 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Removing a tight binding ligand

Hi all,

I am working with a substrate binding protein. The protein 
scavenges its endogenous ligand out of the E. coli used for 
expression. I need to get this ligand out for both 
crystallographic and kinetic studies. I have tried denaturing in 
urea and refolding the protein with limited success. It refolds 
properly according to the CD spectra but it some how manages to 
hold on to trace amounts of ligand despite serial dialysis (500ml 
to 5ml of sample) in 8M, 6M, 4M, 2M 1M urea followed by 50mM Tris. 
I also have a homolog that abjectly refuses to refold in either 
urea or guanidine, though it does turn the dialysis tubing into a 
lovely snow globe. There are alternative methods of performing the 
kinetics, but those will require destroying the protein which 
doesn't help on the crystallography front.

I was wondering if any of you out there had experience 
successfully removing very tightly bound ligands by an alternative 
method. I didn't see any mention on the subject in the archives. I 
had hoped you might be able to point me in the right direction.

Thanks for your time,

Katherine

Ph. D. candidate
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
College of Medicine
University of Florida


Re: [ccp4bb] Removing a tight binding ligand

2010-10-08 Thread Nadir T. Mrabet

 Hi,
It could help if you said what your ligand is.

Nadir

Pr. Nadir T. Mrabet
Structural  Molecular Biochemistry
Nutrigenex - INSERM U-954
Nancy University, School of Medicine
9, Avenue de la Foret de Haye, BP 184
54505 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy Cedex
France
Phone: +33 (0)3.83.68.32.73
Fax:   +33 (0)3.83.68.32.79
E-mail: Nadir.Mrabetat  medecine.uhp-nancy.fr



On 08/10/2010 03:05, SIPPEL,KATHERINE H wrote:

Hi all,

I am working with a substrate binding protein. The protein scavenges 
its endogenous ligand out of the E. coli used for expression. I need 
to get this ligand out for both crystallographic and kinetic studies. 
I have tried denaturing in urea and refolding the protein with limited 
success. It refolds properly according to the CD spectra but it some 
how manages to hold on to trace amounts of ligand despite serial 
dialysis (500ml to 5ml of sample) in 8M, 6M, 4M, 2M 1M urea followed 
by 50mM Tris. I also have a homolog that abjectly refuses to refold in 
either urea or guanidine, though it does turn the dialysis tubing into 
a lovely snow globe. There are alternative methods of performing the 
kinetics, but those will require destroying the protein which doesn't 
help on the crystallography front.


I was wondering if any of you out there had experience successfully 
removing very tightly bound ligands by an alternative method. I didn't 
see any mention on the subject in the archives. I had hoped you might 
be able to point me in the right direction.


Thanks for your time,

Katherine

Ph. D. candidate
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
College of Medicine
University of Florida



Re: [ccp4bb] Removing a tight binding ligand

2010-10-08 Thread Joseph Ho
It is just like the regular dialysis but the deserved buffer contains
charcol powder.

Meng-Chiao Joseph Ho

 How do you do this ?
 I have not heard of this, but I also never had to deal with getting rid of
 a ligand.
 However I would be interested to learn more about this method.

 Thanks,

 Jürgen

 -
 Jürgen Bosch
 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
 Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
 Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
 615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
 Baltimore, MD 21205
 Phone: +1-410-614-4742
 Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
 Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
 http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/

 On Oct 8, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Joseph Ho wrote:

 We often dialysis protein against charcoal to remove small molecules
 that
 tightly bind to protein.

 Meng-Chiao Joseph Ho, PhD
 Department of Biochemistry
 Albert Einstein College of Medicine
 Hi all,

 I am working with a substrate binding protein. The protein
 scavenges its endogenous ligand out of the E. coli used for
 expression. I need to get this ligand out for both
 crystallographic and kinetic studies. I have tried denaturing in
 urea and refolding the protein with limited success. It refolds
 properly according to the CD spectra but it some how manages to
 hold on to trace amounts of ligand despite serial dialysis (500ml
 to 5ml of sample) in 8M, 6M, 4M, 2M 1M urea followed by 50mM Tris.
 I also have a homolog that abjectly refuses to refold in either
 urea or guanidine, though it does turn the dialysis tubing into a
 lovely snow globe. There are alternative methods of performing the
 kinetics, but those will require destroying the protein which
 doesn't help on the crystallography front.

 I was wondering if any of you out there had experience
 successfully removing very tightly bound ligands by an alternative
 method. I didn't see any mention on the subject in the archives. I
 had hoped you might be able to point me in the right direction.

 Thanks for your time,

 Katherine

 Ph. D. candidate
 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
 College of Medicine
 University of Florida





Re: [ccp4bb] Removing a tight binding ligand

2010-10-08 Thread SIPPEL,KATHERINE H
I would like to thank all of you for your replies. I very much 
appreciate your time and I've got some great starting points to 
try out. I will put together a recap of the off- and on-board 
comments in the next day or so for archive posterity.


For those looking for more details...

The protein is specifically a monomeric substrate binding protein 
(very roughly similar to MBP) and binds a  water-soluble vitamin. 
It's purified exclusively by ion exchange so no tags though it is 
shy a bit of the N-terminal domain to remove a lipo- moiety. I 
have no idea what the Kd is at the moment, that was what I was 
hoping to calculate. I do have the bound structure, it is not 
covalently attached to the protein. The interactions are mostly 
hydrophobic with only a couple of hydrogen bonds.


Once again, thank you all,

Katherine

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Joseph Ho 
j...@medusa.bioc.aecom.yu.edu wrote:


   It is just like the regular dialysis but the deserved buffer 
contains

   charcol powder.

   Meng-Chiao Joseph Ho

How do you do this ?
I have not heard of this, but I also never had to deal with 
getting rid of

a ligand.
However I would be interested to learn more about this 
method.

   
Thanks,
   
J??rgen
   
-
J??rgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/
   
On Oct 8, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Joseph Ho wrote:
   
We often dialysis protein against charcoal to remove small 
molecules

that
tightly bind to protein.
   
Meng-Chiao Joseph Ho, PhD
Department of Biochemistry
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Hi all,
   
I am working with a substrate binding protein. The 
protein
scavenges its endogenous ligand out of the E. coli used 
for

expression. I need to get this ligand out for both
crystallographic and kinetic studies. I have tried 
denaturing in
urea and refolding the protein with limited success. It 
refolds
properly according to the CD spectra but it some how 
manages to
hold on to trace amounts of ligand despite serial dialysis 
(500ml
to 5ml of sample) in 8M, 6M, 4M, 2M 1M urea followed by 
50mM Tris.
I also have a homolog that abjectly refuses to refold in 
either
urea or guanidine, though it does turn the dialysis tubing 
into a
lovely snow globe. There are alternative methods of 
performing the
kinetics, but those will require destroying the protein 
which

doesn't help on the crystallography front.
   
I was wondering if any of you out there had experience
successfully removing very tightly bound ligands by an 
alternative
method. I didn't see any mention on the subject in the 
archives. I
had hoped you might be able to point me in the right 
direction.

   
Thanks for your time,
   
Katherine
   
Ph. D. candidate
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
College of Medicine
University of Florida
   
   
   


--
SIPPEL,KATHERINE H
Ph. D. candidate
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
College of Medicine
University of Florida


Re: [ccp4bb] Removing a tight binding ligand

2010-10-07 Thread Daniel Bonsor
It refolds properly according to the CD spectra but it some how manages to 
hold on to trace amounts of ligand despite serial dialysis (500ml to 5ml of 
sample) in 8M, 6M, 4M, 2M 1M urea followed by 50mM Tris. I also have a homolog 
that abjectly refuses to refold in either urea or guanidine, though it does 
turn the dialysis tubing into a lovely snow globe.

I am assuming that the protein is tagged in someway and that you add your 
purified protein to Urea/Guanidine and refold by dialysis. 

If you protein is His-tagged, I would unfold it on the column and flush a large 
excess of Binding buffer (containing denaturant) to remove the ligand and elute 
the protein in elution buffer (containing  denaturant) and then refold, to 
ensure that no ligand is present during refolding. If this is what you have 
done, ignore this.

For the protein that cannot be refolding, have you investigated thermal 
denaturation. I have removed a 1kDa ligand by placing a nickel column in a 
water bath set near to the Tm of the protein. After flushing an excess of 
prewarmed buffer through, the water bath was switched off, allowed to cool to 
RT and then protein eluted off. Around ~95% was refolded. The unfolded protein 
was then separated by size-exclusion. 


Though I have no evidence for this and I am just thinking out aloud (please 
could someone correct me if I am wrong, have evidence to the contrary or both), 
if the ligand is not present in the periplasm, and the protein is targeted 
through the sec pathway (which recognizes unfolded proteins), purification from 
the periplasm could circumvent refolding if you are lucky and you do not get 
cytoplasmic contamination. 

All the best


Dan


Re: [ccp4bb] Removing a tight binding ligand

2010-10-07 Thread Nian Huang
Kd is crucial. If this is something like streptavidin and biotin,
there is no way to separate them without denature the protein. You can
try varying pH, binding it to ion exchange column and then washing it
with large volume of buffer, as mentioned in MBP manual from NEB, or
running it through a hydrophobic column after treating the protein
with really high salt. The last one worked for one of my colleagues.
Although I still doubt you can completely get rid of the ligands.

Nian Huang, Ph,D.
Dept. of Biochemistry
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75390

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:05 PM, SIPPEL,KATHERINE H ksip...@ufl.edu wrote:
 Hi all,

 I am working with a substrate binding protein. The protein scavenges its
 endogenous ligand out of the E. coli used for expression. I need to get this
 ligand out for both crystallographic and kinetic studies. I have tried
 denaturing in urea and refolding the protein with limited success. It
 refolds properly according to the CD spectra but it some how manages to hold
 on to trace amounts of ligand despite serial dialysis (500ml to 5ml of
 sample) in 8M, 6M, 4M, 2M 1M urea followed by 50mM Tris. I also have a
 homolog that abjectly refuses to refold in either urea or guanidine, though
 it does turn the dialysis tubing into a lovely snow globe. There are
 alternative methods of performing the kinetics, but those will require
 destroying the protein which doesn't help on the crystallography front.

 I was wondering if any of you out there had experience successfully removing
 very tightly bound ligands by an alternative method. I didn't see any
 mention on the subject in the archives. I had hoped you might be able to
 point me in the right direction.

 Thanks for your time,

 Katherine

 Ph. D. candidate
 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
 College of Medicine
 University of Florida