Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, please refer to my earlier email below. Thanks Philip Jensen -- * From: * Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com; * To: * centos-docs@centos.org centos-docs@centos.org; * Subject: * [CentOS-docs] Request access to CentOS wiki * Sent: * Mon, Dec 30, 2013 9:35:28 PM Hello Per the process documented here ( http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5), I am requesting access to contribute to the CentOS wiki. Wiki username: PhilipJensen Proposed subject: How to setup CentOS 6.x with BTRFS root Proposed location: HOWTOs, 16. Storage devices, Logical Volume Management, and RAID many thanks Philip Jensen I don't know why no one is responding to your offer to contribute to the wiki. Usually it is Ralph (wiki master) that takes care of this type of request. But if he is busy, some other CentOS devs should get to it. No response from the admin side would discourage potential contributors like yourself ... :-( Anyway, you will probably be asked to present what you have written (or are going to write) before it gets published. Akemi, just a fellow contributor ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
On 05.01.2014 22:07, Philip Jensen wrote: Hello, please refer to my earlier email below. Sorry, post-holiday stress (or something like that) :) You now have a homepage at http://wiki.centos.org/PhilipJensen on and *under* which you can edit to your heart's content (under meaning PhilipJensen/FooBar). Once you have your stuff there, we will take a look at that. Cheers and sorry for the late reply, Ralph ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
Hi Ralph Thanks for that. Can you modify the permissions on my homepage so I can edit it? cheers Phil On Wednesday, 8 January 2014, 8:42, Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote: On 05.01.2014 22:07, Philip Jensen wrote: Hello, please refer to my earlier email below. Sorry, post-holiday stress (or something like that) :) You now have a homepage at http://wiki.centos.org/PhilipJensen on and *under* which you can edit to your heart's content (under meaning PhilipJensen/FooBar). Once you have your stuff there, we will take a look at that. Cheers and sorry for the late reply, Ralph ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
On 7 January 2014 23:19, Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Ralph Thanks for that. Can you modify the permissions on my homepage so I can edit it? cheers Phil Would you please try by logging out of the wiki, clearing your browser's cache and then logging back in again. I've taken a quick look and the acl seems to be correct. Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
Hi Alan Thanks for your reply. By viewing the page in raw mode I can see the acl isn't quite correct (ref: http://moinmo.in/HelpOnAccessControlLists#Syntax_.26_Usage). It's not the top-most line on the page, and the format shouldn't have a colon after the #acl pragma:- #acl: PhilipJensen:read,write,delete,revert,admin Default I've compared this to yours which is as follows:- #acl AlanBartlett:read,write,revert,delete,admin Default Note the colon doesn't exist after the 'acl' pragma. many thanks Phil On Wednesday, 8 January 2014, 12:28, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote: On 7 January 2014 23:19, Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Ralph Thanks for that. Can you modify the permissions on my homepage so I can edit it? cheers Phil Would you please try by logging out of the wiki, clearing your browser's cache and then logging back in again. I've taken a quick look and the acl seems to be correct. Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
On 7 January 2014 23:42, Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Alan Thanks for your reply. By viewing the page in raw mode I can see the acl isn't quite correct (ref: http://moinmo.in/HelpOnAccessControlLists#Syntax_.26_Usage). It's not the top-most line on the page, and the format shouldn't have a colon after the #acl pragma:- #acl: PhilipJensen:read,write,delete,revert,admin Default I've compared this to yours which is as follows:- #acl AlanBartlett:read,write,revert,delete,admin Default Note the colon doesn't exist after the 'acl' pragma. many thanks Phil Well spotted Phil! Unfortunately I am unable to edit the acl line so it's a case of waiting for Ralph, once again. Sorry. :-/ Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
Hi Alan Thanks for your reply. By viewing the page in raw mode I can see the acl isn't quite correct (ref: http://moinmo.in/HelpOnAccessControlLists#Syntax_.26_Usage). It's not the top-most line on the page, and the format shouldn't have a colon after the #acl pragma:- #acl: PhilipJensen:read,write,delete,revert,admin Default I've compared this to yours which is as follows:- #acl AlanBartlett:read,write,revert,delete,admin Default Note the colon doesn't exist after the 'acl' pragma. many thanks Phil On Wednesday, 8 January 2014, 12:28, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote: On 7 January 2014 23:19, Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Ralph Thanks for that. Can you modify the permissions on my homepage so I can edit it? cheers Phil Would you please try by logging out of the wiki, clearing your browser's cache and then logging back in again. I've taken a quick look and the acl seems to be correct. Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
Apologies to all for the mail-blast, having trouble with Yahoo!Mail. :-( On Wednesday, 8 January 2014, 12:57, Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Alan Thanks for your reply. By viewing the page in raw mode I can see the acl isn't quite correct (ref: http://moinmo.in/HelpOnAccessControlLists#Syntax_.26_Usage). It's not the top-most line on the page, and the format shouldn't have a colon after the #acl pragma:- #acl: PhilipJensen:read,write,delete,revert,admin Default I've compared this to yours which is as follows:- #acl AlanBartlett:read,write,revert,delete,admin Default Note the colon doesn't exist after the 'acl' pragma. many thanks Phil On Wednesday, 8 January 2014, 12:28, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote: On 7 January 2014 23:19, Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Ralph Thanks for that. Can you modify the permissions on my homepage so I can edit it? cheers Phil Would you please try by logging out of the wiki, clearing your browser's cache and then logging back in again. I've taken a quick look and the acl seems to be correct. Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
Hi, On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:51:19PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote: On 7 January 2014 23:42, Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Alan Thanks for your reply. By viewing the page in raw mode I can see the acl isn't quite correct (ref: http://moinmo.in/HelpOnAccessControlLists#Syntax_.26_Usage). It's not the top-most line on the page, and the format shouldn't have a colon after the #acl pragma:- #acl: PhilipJensen:read,write,delete,revert,admin Default I've compared this to yours which is as follows:- #acl AlanBartlett:read,write,revert,delete,admin Default Note the colon doesn't exist after the 'acl' pragma. many thanks Phil Well spotted Phil! Unfortunately I am unable to edit the acl line so it's a case of waiting for Ralph, once again. Sorry. :-/ is that ok now? 1st line reads: #acl PhilipJensen:read,write,delete,revert,admin Default Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpz3yIPe9woE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
On 8 January 2014 00:07, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote: Hi, is that ok now? 1st line reads: #acl PhilipJensen:read,write,delete,revert,admin Default Tru Thank Tru. Looking with my critical eye, I think it is now correct. Black mark for Ralph. Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote: Thank Tru. Looking with my critical eye, I think it is now correct. Black mark for Ralph. Remember, he said post-holiday stress ? Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
On 8 January 2014 00:19, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote: Thank Tru. Looking with my critical eye, I think it is now correct. Black mark for Ralph. Remember, he said post-holiday stress ? Akemi Both you and I know that probably translates as post Germanic-beer-festival syndrome! ;-) Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Resend: Request access to CentOS wiki
Hi Tru That's perfect - thanks! Just made a small change which worked fine. thanks Phil On Wednesday, 8 January 2014, 13:07, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:51:19PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote: On 7 January 2014 23:42, Philip Jensen phil_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Alan Thanks for your reply. By viewing the page in raw mode I can see the acl isn't quite correct (ref: http://moinmo.in/HelpOnAccessControlLists#Syntax_.26_Usage). It's not the top-most line on the page, and the format shouldn't have a colon after the #acl pragma:- #acl: PhilipJensen:read,write,delete,revert,admin Default I've compared this to yours which is as follows:- #acl AlanBartlett:read,write,revert,delete,admin Default Note the colon doesn't exist after the 'acl' pragma. many thanks Phil Well spotted Phil! Unfortunately I am unable to edit the acl line so it's a case of waiting for Ralph, once again. Sorry. :-/ is that ok now? 1st line reads: #acl PhilipJensen:read,write,delete,revert,admin Default Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits
esta desarrolada mi aplicacion en php puro Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:20:01 -0430 From: tecnologiaterab...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Debes chequear bien la configuración de tu servidor: 1.- Revisar que apache este corriendo. 2.- Revisar que php este corriendo. 3.- Revisar que tienes conexion con la base de datos, sea mysql o postgres. 4.- Revisar los permisos de los archivos. Ese error que te arroja el php debería dejar correr tu aplicación sin problemas, estas corriendo joomla, wordpress o es una aplicación especifica en que esta hecha. Saludos, El 6 de enero de 2014, 22:07, Ramón Macías Zamora rmac...@rks.ec escribió: el warning del date lo arreglas en /etc/php.ini le configuras la linea que dice date.timezone de acuerdo a tu región, en mi caso: date.timezone = America/Guayaquil, te sugiero que pongas un refresh (ctrl+f5) y los mensajes que te salgan en ese momento los pasas, en que herramienta está desarrollado el sitio? php puro o con algún framework? Saludos -- Ramón Macías Zamora Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo www.rks.ec - www.raykasolutions.com Guayaquil - Ecuador msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com skype: ramon_macias UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org) Cel:593-8-0192238 Tel:593 4 6044566 http://www.raykasolutions.com/ WEB SITES, HOSTINGS, DOMINIOS, MANTENIMIENTO DE EQUIPOS, REDES, SERVIDORES LINUX, SOPORTE. 2014/1/6 Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com esto es lo que contiene el /var/log/http/error_logerror client:1 PHP Warning date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezoneerror client PHP Notice: undefined index From: rmac...@rks.ec Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 16:34:45 -0500 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits revisa los log en /var/log/http/error_log, también puedes revisar en $DOCUMENTROOT/error_log Saludos -- Ramón Macías Zamora Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo www.rks.ec - www.raykasolutions.com Guayaquil - Ecuador msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com skype: ramon_macias UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org) Cel:593-8-0192238 Tel:593 4 6044566 http://www.raykasolutions.com/ WEB SITES, HOSTINGS, DOMINIOS, MANTENIMIENTO DE EQUIPOS, REDES, SERVIDORES LINUX, SOPORTE. 2014/1/4 Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 13:56:08 -0500 From: cantrel...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Para revisar que dependencias instaladas y no instaladas de php tienes puedes crear en tu documenroot un index.php y pones la funcion phpinfo(); avisas como te va. --- Mensaje Original --- Desde: Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com Enviado: 4 de enero de 2014 1:47 p.m. Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Ya realice el info.php y me da PHP y versioncomo se si son todos los paquetes que usa php sigue sin abrir mi aplicacion solo esta en blanco gracias Ya revise el archivo iptables y existe las dos lineas del puerto 22 y puerto 80 di de baja el puerto 80 y entre a mi aplicacion y solo aparece la pagina en blanco y no hace nada, alguna otra opcion que pueda hacer o buscar Gracias From: jciban...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 18:26:12 + Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Como puedo saber que estan todos los paquetes instalados de php para poder instalar los que faltan el mod_rewrite no esta pero no me deja instalarlo por el yum From: jrobertoa...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 18:43:53 -0600 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits El día 3 de enero de 2014, 14:18, Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com escribió: Buen dia Tengo un servidor HP Proliant ML 310e Gen8, le instale centos 6.5 x86_64, se instalo todo bien veo perfectamente internet sin ningun problema, el problema es que cuando quiero entrar a la pagina de mi aplicacion que esta desarrollada en php me manda un error 500 html y no abre mi aplicacion Me podran ayudar? Gracias de antemano Por pasos: * Probaria si Apache funcionando. * PHP funcionando con apache, como te lo han dicho(Aca se prueba PHP, no apache ?php phpinfo(); ?) * Desabilitar Selinux, mientras haces tus pruebas que funcionen, luego ya le pueden entrar a la seguridad.
Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits
Ok esta bien me imagino que esta la hiciste en dreamweaver o bloc de notas, eso no es relevante por ahora, tu aplicación corre en tu maquina local, si es así que versión de php usas (si usas xaamp, vamp, o cualquier otro paquete busca las revisiones), eso es importante si es una aplicación vieja, es posible que no cumpla los estándares de las nuevas versiones de php que tienen algunos cambios, por ello te recomiendo que uses las mismas versiones que en tu maquina local para hacer correr dicha aplicación. otra cosa que suelo recomendar como programador es usar https://bitbucket.org/ o sea repositorios, los cuales te van a permitir clonar tu aplicación y solo cambiar las opciones de configuración en tu config.php normalmente, esa seria mi recomendación si ya chequeaste lo demas, Saludos, El 7 de enero de 2014, 12:51, Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com escribió: esta desarrolada mi aplicacion en php puro Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:20:01 -0430 From: tecnologiaterab...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Debes chequear bien la configuración de tu servidor: 1.- Revisar que apache este corriendo. 2.- Revisar que php este corriendo. 3.- Revisar que tienes conexion con la base de datos, sea mysql o postgres. 4.- Revisar los permisos de los archivos. Ese error que te arroja el php debería dejar correr tu aplicación sin problemas, estas corriendo joomla, wordpress o es una aplicación especifica en que esta hecha. Saludos, El 6 de enero de 2014, 22:07, Ramón Macías Zamora rmac...@rks.ec escribió: el warning del date lo arreglas en /etc/php.ini le configuras la linea que dice date.timezone de acuerdo a tu región, en mi caso: date.timezone = America/Guayaquil, te sugiero que pongas un refresh (ctrl+f5) y los mensajes que te salgan en ese momento los pasas, en que herramienta está desarrollado el sitio? php puro o con algún framework? Saludos -- Ramón Macías Zamora Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo www.rks.ec - www.raykasolutions.com Guayaquil - Ecuador msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com skype: ramon_macias UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org) Cel:593-8-0192238 Tel:593 4 6044566 http://www.raykasolutions.com/ WEB SITES, HOSTINGS, DOMINIOS, MANTENIMIENTO DE EQUIPOS, REDES, SERVIDORES LINUX, SOPORTE. 2014/1/6 Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com esto es lo que contiene el /var/log/http/error_logerror client:1 PHP Warning date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezoneerror client PHP Notice: undefined index From: rmac...@rks.ec Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 16:34:45 -0500 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits revisa los log en /var/log/http/error_log, también puedes revisar en $DOCUMENTROOT/error_log Saludos -- Ramón Macías Zamora Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo www.rks.ec - www.raykasolutions.com Guayaquil - Ecuador msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com skype: ramon_macias UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org) Cel:593-8-0192238 Tel:593 4 6044566 http://www.raykasolutions.com/ WEB SITES, HOSTINGS, DOMINIOS, MANTENIMIENTO DE EQUIPOS, REDES, SERVIDORES LINUX, SOPORTE. 2014/1/4 Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 13:56:08 -0500 From: cantrel...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Para revisar que dependencias instaladas y no instaladas de php tienes puedes crear en tu documenroot un index.php y pones la funcion phpinfo(); avisas como te va. --- Mensaje Original --- Desde: Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com Enviado: 4 de enero de 2014 1:47 p.m. Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Ya realice el info.php y me da PHP y versioncomo se si son todos los paquetes que usa php sigue sin abrir mi aplicacion solo esta en blanco gracias Ya revise el archivo iptables y existe las dos lineas del puerto 22 y puerto 80 di de baja el puerto 80 y entre a mi aplicacion y solo aparece la pagina en blanco y no hace nada, alguna otra opcion que pueda hacer o buscar Gracias From: jciban...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 18:26:12 + Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Como puedo saber que estan todos los paquetes instalados de php para poder instalar los que faltan el mod_rewrite no esta pero no me deja instalarlo por el yum
Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits
Has podido capturar los mensajes de error en el momento que pones refrescar (ctrl+F5)? Saludos -- Ramón Macías Zamora Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo www.rks.ec - www.raykasolutions.com Guayaquil - Ecuador msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com skype: ramon_macias UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org) Cel:593-8-0192238 Tel:593 4 6044566 http://www.raykasolutions.com/ WEB SITES, HOSTINGS, DOMINIOS, MANTENIMIENTO DE EQUIPOS, REDES, SERVIDORES LINUX, SOPORTE. 2014/1/7 Wilmer Arambula tecnologiaterab...@gmail.com Ok esta bien me imagino que esta la hiciste en dreamweaver o bloc de notas, eso no es relevante por ahora, tu aplicación corre en tu maquina local, si es así que versión de php usas (si usas xaamp, vamp, o cualquier otro paquete busca las revisiones), eso es importante si es una aplicación vieja, es posible que no cumpla los estándares de las nuevas versiones de php que tienen algunos cambios, por ello te recomiendo que uses las mismas versiones que en tu maquina local para hacer correr dicha aplicación. otra cosa que suelo recomendar como programador es usar https://bitbucket.org/o sea repositorios, los cuales te van a permitir clonar tu aplicación y solo cambiar las opciones de configuración en tu config.php normalmente, esa seria mi recomendación si ya chequeaste lo demas, Saludos, El 7 de enero de 2014, 12:51, Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com escribió: esta desarrolada mi aplicacion en php puro Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:20:01 -0430 From: tecnologiaterab...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Debes chequear bien la configuración de tu servidor: 1.- Revisar que apache este corriendo. 2.- Revisar que php este corriendo. 3.- Revisar que tienes conexion con la base de datos, sea mysql o postgres. 4.- Revisar los permisos de los archivos. Ese error que te arroja el php debería dejar correr tu aplicación sin problemas, estas corriendo joomla, wordpress o es una aplicación especifica en que esta hecha. Saludos, El 6 de enero de 2014, 22:07, Ramón Macías Zamora rmac...@rks.ec escribió: el warning del date lo arreglas en /etc/php.ini le configuras la linea que dice date.timezone de acuerdo a tu región, en mi caso: date.timezone = America/Guayaquil, te sugiero que pongas un refresh (ctrl+f5) y los mensajes que te salgan en ese momento los pasas, en que herramienta está desarrollado el sitio? php puro o con algún framework? Saludos -- Ramón Macías Zamora Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo www.rks.ec - www.raykasolutions.com Guayaquil - Ecuador msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com skype: ramon_macias UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org) Cel:593-8-0192238 Tel:593 4 6044566 http://www.raykasolutions.com/ WEB SITES, HOSTINGS, DOMINIOS, MANTENIMIENTO DE EQUIPOS, REDES, SERVIDORES LINUX, SOPORTE. 2014/1/6 Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com esto es lo que contiene el /var/log/http/error_logerror client:1 PHP Warning date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezoneerror client PHP Notice: undefined index From: rmac...@rks.ec Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 16:34:45 -0500 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits revisa los log en /var/log/http/error_log, también puedes revisar en $DOCUMENTROOT/error_log Saludos -- Ramón Macías Zamora Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo www.rks.ec - www.raykasolutions.com Guayaquil - Ecuador msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com skype: ramon_macias UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org) Cel:593-8-0192238 Tel:593 4 6044566 http://www.raykasolutions.com/ WEB SITES, HOSTINGS, DOMINIOS, MANTENIMIENTO DE EQUIPOS, REDES, SERVIDORES LINUX, SOPORTE. 2014/1/4 Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 13:56:08 -0500 From: cantrel...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Para revisar que dependencias instaladas y no instaladas de php tienes puedes crear en tu documenroot un index.php y pones la funcion phpinfo(); avisas como te va. --- Mensaje Original --- Desde: Ing.Juan Carlos Ibañez Alva jciban...@hotmail.com Enviado: 4 de enero de 2014 1:47 p.m. Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor HP 64 bits Ya realice el info.php y me da PHP y versioncomo se si son todos los paquetes que usa php sigue sin abrir mi aplicacion solo esta en
[CentOS-es] Actualizar VPS.
Normalmente actualizo mi VPS en producción sin mayor problema, ahora salio unas versiones nuevas del Kernel, cual es la mejor forma de actualizar sin tener problemas, me paso esa duda, Saludos, -- *Wilmer Arambula. * *Asoc. Cooperativa Tecnologia Terabyte 124, RL.Tlfs: +58 02512623601 - +58 4125110921.* *Representante para Venezuela.* *Digital Identification Solutions* *EDI**secure*® *Fingertec*® ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Centos-compatible motherboards
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 26 december 2013 05:05 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos-compatible motherboards See:https://hardware.redhat.com/RHEL6 that listing is nearly useless for this.it doesn't contain motherboards, it contains complete brand name systems that were submitted for paid testing. Thanks. That explains why I've never been able to use it to make a somewhat educated guess on what mobos/other components to get. -- //Sorin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 107, Issue 3
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2014:0005 CentOS 6 sssd Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:08:49 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:0005 CentOS 6 sssd Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20140106160849.ga10...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0005
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0005.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0d31e0bfd94af81305f8e620a2c859c141d63ee6e7e1695da18ce9ff32b1d8ad
libipa_hbac-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
bd616a723787d89ad2832219915964b1cbb5c45251e013323a17572d18279a7d
libipa_hbac-devel-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
89ef63c0d8b7d94d53ae76130d82624de337b1b17124abd44f3e5c8dfe8fe442
libipa_hbac-python-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
d029a76709875099b811c8b788ca761a4851fed24a3e6cd8ac8301aeeebfe50e
libsss_autofs-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
ca729ea089821db0a6e31fae61ef8af691ee44b1c1dd3b7cab3706561ac5de8f
libsss_idmap-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
570b574f6edd9bc3aeead48a3c8c3dda1425a97c5b53b429c8e99d83236b706b
libsss_idmap-devel-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
c4c441c07b31ffb3515725e08bfdb42bb0bf6a40731b21a8ccf737918765c0d1
libsss_sudo-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
fab7bb18cf94a75dc2ae89444cd26f593871ff74e0ee7d48d4703121f3d3
libsss_sudo-devel-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
036a42feb61a07ae20a44ba2119f59f7208acdcb4a3f2c99578ae6fb8e950806
sssd-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
63b9d09340e4c54efec67109d168de2ec1c489e9f08e5eb0887cc155977c4406
sssd-client-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
82673b1596a9ac0dddcbbc09398607d20a2d852e65d37dc8294260d82d2ef485
sssd-tools-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
x86_64:
0d31e0bfd94af81305f8e620a2c859c141d63ee6e7e1695da18ce9ff32b1d8ad
libipa_hbac-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
ac4561121f9aaf41acae676fbb33cff958afb8c071a43274b7970df0c056191f
libipa_hbac-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
bd616a723787d89ad2832219915964b1cbb5c45251e013323a17572d18279a7d
libipa_hbac-devel-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
2a53eda1460fdf2cc9df81487c05c45c876d70fa104ee88833a40864bff84bd6
libipa_hbac-devel-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
09f2329cf4a85ce0ed1e2e5d57df1548b592143cc914d56996abf704ba34044b
libipa_hbac-python-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
73eaff3cccaa30f13cf431c1b5b19461e9e2c931ea85e2a00fe73d5c2109104f
libsss_autofs-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
ca729ea089821db0a6e31fae61ef8af691ee44b1c1dd3b7cab3706561ac5de8f
libsss_idmap-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
a7ba5cea05f9519f873bd08bdb478aad7f79156f8db26a7aceaf264ce90593e9
libsss_idmap-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
570b574f6edd9bc3aeead48a3c8c3dda1425a97c5b53b429c8e99d83236b706b
libsss_idmap-devel-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
f9346e709519c0bcb049d0f9d1cbe95692864bb8f114a96b1913f0763bf94dad
libsss_idmap-devel-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
3ccbe1d1f618371ed1a71dc08fa30b5a997c0fcc119704202a901e5fd7cc9520
libsss_sudo-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
fab7bb18cf94a75dc2ae89444cd26f593871ff74e0ee7d48d4703121f3d3
libsss_sudo-devel-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
9a72bb6896d6052055cecf2206d0cdd49bd7ef672040f2154da662402d34082d
libsss_sudo-devel-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
6afd1e8393d11c7f977b715a49935db27868dc9375c614872d65d4084e9e5d36
sssd-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
63b9d09340e4c54efec67109d168de2ec1c489e9f08e5eb0887cc155977c4406
sssd-client-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.i686.rpm
218cbec8a327d7077713b545d95738f962d2fec46d11a6ee415b9858cd01012b
sssd-client-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
c7e5f0ab55282731cf7a4d0b316cec008135772a6b9eae5fc0c74f2f7bb9d81b
sssd-tools-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
ccda87b7a3678c790b5802581d057d16f76ac908c1d317e55bb61b5730c892e3
sssd-1.9.2-129.el6_5.4.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 107, Issue 3
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Forward http traffic
Hello, On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables): *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -s 10.10.10.0/24 -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -s 10.10.10.0/24 -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT Now, I want to forward all http traffic coming in from 10.250.250.0/24, at local port 8080, to 2 particular IP Addresses (port 80). Is it enough to prepend (to the above) the following: *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80 COMMIT ...? Please advise! Thanks in advance, Nick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SSSD and usermod
Hi Dimitar! We only want to SSSD with 389DS instead of the local passwd/shadow files. We do not want to go full IPA for this server. Setting up SSSD with authconfig automatically set up PAM and /etc/nsswitch.conf. SSSD will only be used for these (nsswitch.conf): passwd:files sss shadow:files sss services: files sss I have also attached our sssd.conf. Currently getent and id cmdline tools work as expected by getting user info from SSSD which in turn gets it from 389DS/LDAP. SSH also works. We are starting to lean toward the possibility, that usermod and its sibling utils from shadow-utils do not support SSSD as fully as we were expecting them to. Is this the case and can any other cmdline user administration tools be used to lock users? I know there is the possibility of making our own tools for this, but still... Regards, Mitja -- Mitja Mihelič ARNES, Tehnološki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia tel: +386 1 479 8877, fax: +386 1 479 88 78 On 06. 01. 2014 16:02, Dimitar Georgievski wrote: Hi MItja, it looks like you are trying to integrate SSSD with FreeIPA. I think the following presentation will help you review the SSSD configuration even if you are trying to use 389DS independently: http://www.freeipa.org/images/7/77/Freeipa30_SSSD_SUDO_Integration.pdf Check the page titled Example configuration - SSSD with FreeIPA server. SSSD has to be configured to talk to LDAP server. Check also the settings in /etc/nsswitch.conf. You might need to modify it to enable SSSD integration with other services. This example comes from a host that is using SSSD for SSH authentication and sudo integration with a FreeIPA server: passwd: files sss shadow: files sss group: files sss sudoers:files sss Dimitar On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Mitja Mihelič mitja.mihe...@arnes.siwrote: Hi! How to get usermod working with SSSD/389DS ? We have SSSD set up on our server and it uses 389DS. SSSD was enabled with the following command: authconfig --enablesssd --enablesssdauth --ldapbasedn=dc=example,dc=com --enableshadow --enablemkhomedir --enablelocauthorize --update Running for example usermod -L username returns: usermod: user 'username' does not exist in /etc/passwd Each time usermod is executed there is a query logged in 389DS, so SSSD does pass the request to 389DS. Strace (attached) of usermod shows that it gets at least gecos back from SSSD and that it checked the /var/lib/sss/mc/passwd file which contains: username Name Lastname /home/username /bin/bash Soon after that it starts to open /etc/shadow and /etc/passwd. What are we missing? Any insight would be appreciated. Regards, Mitja -- -- Mitja Mihelič ARNES, Tehnološki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia tel: +386 1 479 8877, fax: +386 1 479 88 78 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos [domain/default] ldap_tls_reqcert = demand ldap_id_use_start_tls = True cache_credentials = True ldap_search_base = dc=users,dc=company,dc=tld ldap_group_member = uniquemember id_provider = ldap auth_provider = ldap chpass_provider = ldap ldap_uri = ldaps://ldap.company.si ldap_tls_cacertdir = /etc/openldap/cacerts enumerate = false min_id = 1 ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=SSSDUSER,ou=system,dc=company,dc=tld ldap_default_authtok_type = obfuscated_password ldap_default_authtok = PASSWORD_HERE ldap_disable_paging = true ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout = 300 [sssd] services = nss, pam config_file_version = 2 domains = default [nss] filter_users = root,ldap,named,avahi,haldaemon,dbus,radiusd,news,nscd memcache_timeout = 1200 enum_cache_timeout = 400 entry_negative_timeout = 5 debug_level = 0x0400 [pam] reconnection_retries = 3 offline_credentials_expiration = 2 offline_failed_login_attempts = 3 offline_failed_login_delay = 5 debug_level = 0x0400 [sudo] [autofs] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
After all the news about backdoors, planted bugs or weakened standards in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust anything? Can we trust the bios? Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/) looks (at least to me) like magic and any average dev would not (be able to) see evil code in the middle of it...And it is not only an NSA/USA thing, since it seems many countries are cooperating or doing the same... By example, in the middle of the Snowden revelations, France just passed a blanket spying law (without judicial supervision)! Anyway, I think that having a 100% trustable environment is more and more an utopia. What? Pessimistic? Me? Yep! JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote: Hello, On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables): *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -s 10.10.10.0/24 -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -s 10.10.10.0/24 -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT Now, I want to forward all http traffic coming in from 10.250.250.0/24, at local port 8080, to 2 particular IP Addresses (port 80). Is it enough to prepend (to the above) the following: *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80 COMMIT ...? Please advise! Thanks in advance, Nick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi NIck, you need to MASQUERADE the packets in the POSTROUTING chain. Something like the following $ iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE I'm just not sure about if forwarding the packets to two separate hosts will work. I haven't tried that myself. It'll be good to know if this works for you. Many thanks -Vipul ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
John Doe wrote: After all the news about backdoors, planted bugs or weakened standards in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust anything? Can we trust the bios? Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/) One thing on the positive side: the last few months, I think a *lot* of folks are eyeballing this stuff, specifically looking for issues, and probably some are going back to things that they said I dunno... but I'll come back to look at this someday. I *suspect* that within about six months, it'll be as relatively safe as it was maybe 10 years ago. Of course, we'll need some wakeup call to look at it all again in 10 years. In the meantime, I think things are getting safer, relatively. H, speaking of BIOS, wonder if this will impact the push for UEFI mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic
Am 07.01.2014 um 15:01 schrieb Vipul Agarwal vi...@nuttygeeks.com: On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote: Hello, On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables): *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -s 10.10.10.0/24 -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -s 10.10.10.0/24 -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT Now, I want to forward all http traffic coming in from 10.250.250.0/24, at local port 8080, to 2 particular IP Addresses (port 80). Is it enough to prepend (to the above) the following: *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80 what is the criteria to distinguish the packets for xxx and yyy? -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Disappearing directory
Ken Smith wrote:
Hi All and happy new year,
Via a cron job a USB disk is mounted on a Centos 6.4 machine for backup
and dismounted after. I've noticed this failing. See below, the backup
directory that was in /mnt had disappeared, so creating it again as
follows...
{snip}
After the umount the directory vanishes. What gives or have I lost the
plot in 2014. (This works as I'd expect on an old fc14 system I have)
:-) Ken
After a reboot all returns to normal. Very strange. Thanks for all the
replies.
BTW: The crude backup script mounts the external USB device, checks for
a specific file in the root of the external device to verify the right
thing is mounted, runs the backup with various rsync incantations and
then dismounts the external disk. Very simple and basic and working
again... :-) Ken
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHat encryption tools?
On Mon, January 6, 2014 16:51, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Looks like it's rtrying to install it, not just build it. In the first example, you're trying to replace the existing /usr/bin/strip, which only root can do. Are you doing make, or make install? I started out by using the openssl.spec file for openssl-1.0.1f directly from openssl.org. The contents of that file are provided at http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=blob_plain;f=openssl.spec;hb=HEAD. What I then do download the source from openssl.org and put that into ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES and extract it. I then copy ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/openssl-1.0.1f/openssl.spec into ~/rpmbuild/SPECS and run the following commands: mock --buildsrpm --sources=./rpmbuild/SOURCES --spec=./rpmbuild/SPECS/openssl.spec mock --no-clean --rebuild --root=default /var/lib/mock/epel-6-x86_64/result/openssl-1.0.1f-1.src.rpm This gives the error reported above. I realize that this is a naive approach but I after looking at the Redhat openssl.spec file I thought it best to start with the base files provided by the origin and work out any build problems one by one making the absolute minimum number of changes possible. The nearest equivalent Redhat openssl.spec file that I found is that used by Fedora 20 for openssl-1.0.1e and its contents are displayed here: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openssl.git/tree/openssl.spec?h=f20 From what I have read elsewhere, Fedora/Redhat openssl begins with a set of modified source files. The spec file additionally applies about 43 patch files of which 27 alter the functionality of the package. It is not within my ability to determine what effect of the modifications to the source and these additional patches have on the integrity of the openssl provided with RHEL. Is there any third party in our community which does? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
What about selinux - wasn't that originally done by the NSA? On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: John Doe wrote: After all the news about backdoors, planted bugs or weakened standards in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust anything? Can we trust the bios? Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/) One thing on the positive side: the last few months, I think a *lot* of folks are eyeballing this stuff, specifically looking for issues, and probably some are going back to things that they said I dunno... but I'll come back to look at this someday. I *suspect* that within about six months, it'll be as relatively safe as it was maybe 10 years ago. Of course, we'll need some wakeup call to look at it all again in 10 years. In the meantime, I think things are getting safer, relatively. H, speaking of BIOS, wonder if this will impact the push for UEFI mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] FF 24 is borked: One must have tabs, like it or not!
I just did a yum update on my CentOS 5.10 desktop machine and it installed FF 24. And tabs have appeared and cannot be [really] removed! Arg!!! *I HATE TABS!* (Yes I did installed the hide tabs when there is only one tab plugin, but that is not really a complete solution.) In the Mozilla support forum thread relating to this (https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/968331) there is mention of SeaMonkey which has better control of tabs and I was wondering: is there a supported version of SeaMonkey that will install under RHEL5 / CentOS5? Specificly, I am looking for RPMs for SeaMonkey, rather than the tarball install. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / hel...@deepsoft.com Deepwoods Software-- http://www.deepsoft.com/ () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple question on USB flash drive naming
From: James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca I have a USB key that when inserted into a port on my CentOS-6.5 system maounts as this: /dev/sdb1 /media/22d773e3-8502-4196-b45f-388380dcee48 ext2 rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks 0 0 What is the mechanism to give this thing a more human usable mount name / volume name? Just to check... does tune2fs show a volume name...? # tune2fs -l /dev/sdb1 JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FF 24 is borked: One must have tabs, like it or not!
From: Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com I just did a yum update on my CentOS 5.10 desktop machine and it installed FF 24. And tabs have appeared and cannot be [really] removed! Arg!!! *I HATE TABS!* (Yes I did installed the hide tabs when there is only one tab plugin, but that is not really a complete solution.) In the Mozilla support forum thread relating to this (https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/968331) there is mention of SeaMonkey which has better control of tabs and I was wondering: is there a supported version of SeaMonkey that will install under RHEL5 / CentOS5? Specificly, I am looking for RPMs for SeaMonkey, rather than the tarball install. Tried browser.tabs.autoHide in about:config? Otherwise, seamonkey is in epel... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
Just audit the source code... 7.1.2014 16.42 kirjoitti Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com: What about selinux - wasn't that originally done by the NSA? On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: John Doe wrote: After all the news about backdoors, planted bugs or weakened standards in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust anything? Can we trust the bios? Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/) One thing on the positive side: the last few months, I think a *lot* of folks are eyeballing this stuff, specifically looking for issues, and probably some are going back to things that they said I dunno... but I'll come back to look at this someday. I *suspect* that within about six months, it'll be as relatively safe as it was maybe 10 years ago. Of course, we'll need some wakeup call to look at it all again in 10 years. In the meantime, I think things are getting safer, relatively. H, speaking of BIOS, wonder if this will impact the push for UEFI mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: John Doe wrote: After all the news about backdoors, planted bugs or weakened standards in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust anything? Can we trust the bios? Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/) Yeah didn't Dennis Richie modify the C compiler to insert a backdoor for him when ever the compiler saw login.c was being programmed? One thing on the positive side: the last few months, I think a *lot* of folks are eyeballing this stuff, specifically looking for issues, and probably some are going back to things that they said I dunno... but I'll come back to look at this someday. I *suspect* that within about six months, it'll be as relatively safe as it was maybe 10 years ago. Of course, we'll need some wakeup call to look at it all again in 10 years. In the meantime, I think things are getting safer, relatively. H, speaking of BIOS, wonder if this will impact the push for UEFI mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
On 07/01/2014 15:52, Steve Clark wrote: On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: John Doe wrote: After all the news about backdoors, planted bugs or weakened standards in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust anything? Can we trust the bios? Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/) Yeah didn't Dennis Richie modify the C compiler to insert a backdoor for him when ever the compiler saw login.c was being programmed? I think that was ken... -- Regards, Giles Coochey, CCNP, CCNA, CCNAS NetSecSpec Ltd +44 (0) 8444 780677 +44 (0) 7983 877438 http://www.coochey.net http://www.netsecspec.co.uk gi...@coochey.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
On 07/01/2014 15:55, Giles Coochey wrote: On 07/01/2014 15:52, Steve Clark wrote: On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: John Doe wrote: After all the news about backdoors, planted bugs or weakened standards in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust anything? Can we trust the bios? Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/) Yeah didn't Dennis Richie modify the C compiler to insert a backdoor for him when ever the compiler saw login.c was being programmed? I think that was ken... http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html -- Regards, Giles Coochey, CCNP, CCNA, CCNAS NetSecSpec Ltd +44 (0) 8444 780677 +44 (0) 7983 877438 http://www.coochey.net http://www.netsecspec.co.uk gi...@coochey.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote: Can we trust the bios? Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/) Yeah didn't Dennis Richie modify the C compiler to insert a backdoor for him when ever the compiler saw login.c was being programmed? I think that was ken... You are underestimating government agencies. I think they'd go for a backdoor in the CPU itself - harder to find and only a few companies to corrupt to mange it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic
- Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr escreveu: De: Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr Para: centos@centos.org Enviadas: Terça-feira, 7 de Janeiro de 2014 10:28:33 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected Assunto: [CentOS] Forward http traffic Hello, On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables): *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -s 10.10.10.0/24 -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -s 10.10.10.0/24 -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT Now, I want to forward all http traffic coming in from 10.250.250.0/24, at local port 8080, to 2 particular IP Addresses (port 80). Is it enough to prepend (to the above) the following: *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80 COMMIT ...? Please advise! Thanks in advance, Nick Hi Nick, If you put it that way only xxx will receive packets, to balance betwin both of them you will need this: -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx-yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80 Hope this helps, Att., Antonio. -- Antonio da Silva Martins Jr. Analista de Suporte NPD - Núcleo de Processamento de Dados UEM - Universidade Estadual de Maringá email: asmart...@uem.br fone: +55 (44) 3011-4015 / 3011-4411 inoc-dba: 263076*100 Real Programmers don’t need comments — the code is obvious. -- Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivirus e acredita-se estar livre de perigo. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS on HP DL360e with B120i
I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it. I found a useful description at http://www.linuxhelp.in/2013/08/Installing-centos-on-HP-Proliant-DL360e-Gen8-with-B120i-controller.html I have a pair of hard drives to use as a RAID1 mirror. My question to people who may have been this way already is: is it worth my fiddling around with that procedure to get the RAID controller working, performance-wise, or might I just as well use AHCI mode with kernel mdraid? I normally use Supermicro with AHCI and mdraid quite happily, but the customer wanted HP :( Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: t...@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: t...@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS on HP DL360e with B120i
On 1/7/2014 10:39 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it. fwiw, centos 6.recent should recognize that controller, I know it supports the P420i thats in the DL??0p Gen8 systems. Silly question, why are you installing c5 on a new system, its lifecycle is already half over. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS on HP DL360e with B120i
Tony Mountifield wrote: I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it. I found a useful description at http://www.linuxhelp.in/2013/08/Installing-centos-on-HP-Proliant-DL360e-Gen8-with-B120i-controller.html I have a pair of hard drives to use as a RAID1 mirror. Have you already set up the drives in the firmware to present to the o/s? If you haven't done that before, on a system that has all the drives going through the hardware controller, you need to know that you *must* go that way. After, the o/s will see it correctly as SATA/scsi. With Dells and a PERC, even if you don't want RAID, you *must* create it on your drives as raid 0? Something, and then it presents that as a drive. My question to people who may have been this way already is: is it worth my fiddling around with that procedure to get the RAID controller working, performance-wise, or might I just as well use AHCI mode with kernel mdraid? Intel fakeRAID, I do that. For a real h/w RAID controller, you not only should use it, you *must* use it. I normally use Supermicro with AHCI and mdraid quite happily, but the customer wanted HP :( mark, who *really* dislikes SuperMicro m/b ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SSSD and usermod
Hi Mitja, From the description of the problem it seems that the usermod - SSSD integration is not working. 389DS just stores the user information but SSSD is not enforcing the policy, and usermod fails because the user info is not stored locally. I think you should consider using FreeIPA instead of just 389DS, because with it you would be able to manage centrally user policies (sudo, host access rules, account expiration etc). With this you would be able to enforce a lock of a user account on a particular host or group of hosts. FreeIPA would just give you the user friendly tools (Web UI and command line) to manage the user accounts and their policies. 389DS would still be storing and providing the information about these resources. You should also try posting this question on the freeipa mailing list. It also covers the usage of the SSSD client. You could get answers to your questions directly from the developers and RH engineers. If it's of any help I've attached a sample of SSSD configuration used in our environment. Thanks Dimitar On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Mitja Mihelič mitja.mihe...@arnes.siwrote: Hi Dimitar! We only want to SSSD with 389DS instead of the local passwd/shadow files. We do not want to go full IPA for this server. Setting up SSSD with authconfig automatically set up PAM and /etc/nsswitch.conf. SSSD will only be used for these (nsswitch.conf): passwd:files sss shadow:files sss services: files sss I have also attached our sssd.conf. Currently getent and id cmdline tools work as expected by getting user info from SSSD which in turn gets it from 389DS/LDAP. SSH also works. We are starting to lean toward the possibility, that usermod and its sibling utils from shadow-utils do not support SSSD as fully as we were expecting them to. Is this the case and can any other cmdline user administration tools be used to lock users? I know there is the possibility of making our own tools for this, but still... Regards, Mitja -- Mitja Mihelič ARNES, Tehnološki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia tel: +386 1 479 8877, fax: +386 1 479 88 78 On 06. 01. 2014 16:02, Dimitar Georgievski wrote: Hi MItja, it looks like you are trying to integrate SSSD with FreeIPA. I think the following presentation will help you review the SSSD configuration even if you are trying to use 389DS independently: http://www.freeipa.org/images/7/77/Freeipa30_SSSD_SUDO_Integration.pdf Check the page titled Example configuration - SSSD with FreeIPA server. SSSD has to be configured to talk to LDAP server. Check also the settings in /etc/nsswitch.conf. You might need to modify it to enable SSSD integration with other services. This example comes from a host that is using SSSD for SSH authentication and sudo integration with a FreeIPA server: passwd: files sss shadow: files sss group: files sss sudoers:files sss Dimitar On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Mitja Mihelič mitja.mihe...@arnes.si wrote: Hi! How to get usermod working with SSSD/389DS ? We have SSSD set up on our server and it uses 389DS. SSSD was enabled with the following command: authconfig --enablesssd --enablesssdauth --ldapbasedn=dc=example,dc=com --enableshadow --enablemkhomedir --enablelocauthorize --update Running for example usermod -L username returns: usermod: user 'username' does not exist in /etc/passwd Each time usermod is executed there is a query logged in 389DS, so SSSD does pass the request to 389DS. Strace (attached) of usermod shows that it gets at least gecos back from SSSD and that it checked the /var/lib/sss/mc/passwd file which contains: username Name Lastname /home/username /bin/bash Soon after that it starts to open /etc/shadow and /etc/passwd. What are we missing? Any insight would be appreciated. Regards, Mitja -- -- Mitja Mihelič ARNES, Tehnološki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia tel: +386 1 479 8877, fax: +386 1 479 88 78 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
Fantastic news! CentOS and RHEL have been mutually beneficial projects for years. As a user of both, I am extremely happy to see the ties grow between the communities. digimer On 07/01/14 04:09 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation beyond the platform into the next generation of emerging technologies. Working alongside the Fedora and RHEL ecosystems, we hope to further expand on the community offerings by providing a platform that is easily consumed, by other projects to promote their code while we maintain the established base. We are also launching the new CentOS.org website ( http://www.centos.org ). - - The new initiative is going to be overseen by the new CentOS Governing Board. The initial Board comprises of the existing CentOS Core team members : - - Ralph Angenent - - Tru Hyunh - - Johnny Hughes JR - - Jim Perrin - - Karanbir Singh and also sees new members: - - Fabian Arrotin, who comes to the board nominated from the community - - Carl Trieloff, Karsten Wade, and Mike McLean join us, nominated by Red Hat. Please join me in welcoming the new members to the Board. The key operating points of the Board are going to be: Public, Open, and Inclusive. You can find more information about the governance model, the board, and the operating policies we are proposing at http://www.centos.org/about/governance/ Furthermore, some of the existing CentOS Core members are moving to take up roles at Red Hat, as a part of their sponsorship of the CentOS Project, allowing these people to work on the Project as their primary job function. This includes Johnny Hughes Jr, Jim Perrin, Fabian Arrotin, and myself. We will be working with and operating out of the Red Hat Open Source and Standards team in the CTO's Office. - - Some of the things that are not changing: - - The CentOS Linux platform isn't changing. The process and methods built up around the platform however are going to become more open, more inclusive and transparent. - - The sponsor driven content network that has been central to the success of the CentOS efforts over the years stays intact. - - The bugs, issues, and incident handling process stays as it has been with more opportunities for community members to get involved at various stages of the process. - - The Red Hat Enterprise Linux to CentOS firewall will also remain. Members and contributors to the CentOS efforts are still isolated from the RHEL Groups inside Red Hat, with the only interface being srpm / source path tracking, no sooner than is considered released. In summary: we retain an upstream. Feel free to reach out if you have specific concerns about how this change impacts your CentOS story. URLs mentioned at the bottom of this email should be a good starting point. - - Some of the key things that are changing: - - Some of us now work for Red Hat, but not RHEL. This should not have any impact to our ability to do what we have done in the past, it should facilitate a more rapid pace of development and evolution for our work on the community platform. - - Red Hat is offering to sponsor some of the buildsystem and initial content delivery resources - how we are able to consume these and when we are able to make use of this is to be decided. - - Sources that we consume, in the platform, in the addons, or the parallel stacks such as Xen4CentOS will become easier to consume with a git.centos.org being setup, with the scripts and rpm metadata needed to create binaries being published there. The Board also aims to put together a plan to allow groups to come together within the CentOS ecosystem as a Special Interest Group (SIG) and build CentOS Variants on our resources, as officially endorsed. You can read about the proposal at http://www.centos.org/variants/ - - Because we are now able to work with the Red Hat legal teams, some of the contraints that resulted in efforts like CentOS-QA being behind closed doors, now go away and we hope to have the entire build, test, and delivery chain open to anyone who wishes to come and join the effort. The changes we make are going to be community inclusive, and promoted, proposed, formalised, and actioned in an open community centric manner on the centos-devel mailing list. And I highly encourage everyone to come along and participate. - - Contacting us works best via the established community mechanisms. - - Real time chats via IRC ( http://wiki.centos.org/irc ) ; To keep conversation sanity intact, I recommend using the #centos-devel channel to discuss project related activity while #centos is best used
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On 07/01/14 04:09 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: - - Because we are now able to work with the Red Hat legal teams, some of the contraints that resulted in efforts like CentOS-QA being behind closed doors, now go away and we hope to have the entire build, test, and delivery chain open to anyone who wishes to come and join the effort. The changes we make are going to be community inclusive, and promoted, proposed, formalised, and actioned in an open community centric manner on the centos-devel mailing list. And I highly encourage everyone to come along and participate. Does this have any impact on security metadata so that the yum security plugin works without using things like the CEFS script for spacewalk? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
Dne 7.1.2014 22:09, Karanbir Singh napsal(a): With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation beyond the platform into the next generation of emerging technologies. Working alongside the Fedora and RHEL ecosystems, we hope to further expand on the community offerings by providing a platform that is easily consumed, by other projects to promote their code while we maintain the established base. Something I have dreamt of. Good news. Congratulations. Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
That is amazing news, I hope this proves to be a great relationship. Congratulations, looking forward to the future. Aly Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network -Original Message- From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org Sender: centos-announce-boun...@centos.org Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 21:09:27 To: CentOS Announcements Listcentos-annou...@centos.org Reply-To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation beyond the platform into the next generation of emerging technologies. Working alongside the Fedora and RHEL ecosystems, we hope to further expand on the community offerings by providing a platform that is easily consumed, by other projects to promote their code while we maintain the established base. We are also launching the new CentOS.org website ( http://www.centos.org ). - - The new initiative is going to be overseen by the new CentOS Governing Board. The initial Board comprises of the existing CentOS Core team members : - - Ralph Angenent - - Tru Hyunh - - Johnny Hughes JR - - Jim Perrin - - Karanbir Singh and also sees new members: - - Fabian Arrotin, who comes to the board nominated from the community - - Carl Trieloff, Karsten Wade, and Mike McLean join us, nominated by Red Hat. Please join me in welcoming the new members to the Board. The key operating points of the Board are going to be: Public, Open, and Inclusive. You can find more information about the governance model, the board, and the operating policies we are proposing at http://www.centos.org/about/governance/ Furthermore, some of the existing CentOS Core members are moving to take up roles at Red Hat, as a part of their sponsorship of the CentOS Project, allowing these people to work on the Project as their primary job function. This includes Johnny Hughes Jr, Jim Perrin, Fabian Arrotin, and myself. We will be working with and operating out of the Red Hat Open Source and Standards team in the CTO's Office. - - Some of the things that are not changing: - - The CentOS Linux platform isn't changing. The process and methods built up around the platform however are going to become more open, more inclusive and transparent. - - The sponsor driven content network that has been central to the success of the CentOS efforts over the years stays intact. - - The bugs, issues, and incident handling process stays as it has been with more opportunities for community members to get involved at various stages of the process. - - The Red Hat Enterprise Linux to CentOS firewall will also remain. Members and contributors to the CentOS efforts are still isolated from the RHEL Groups inside Red Hat, with the only interface being srpm / source path tracking, no sooner than is considered released. In summary: we retain an upstream. Feel free to reach out if you have specific concerns about how this change impacts your CentOS story. URLs mentioned at the bottom of this email should be a good starting point. - - Some of the key things that are changing: - - Some of us now work for Red Hat, but not RHEL. This should not have any impact to our ability to do what we have done in the past, it should facilitate a more rapid pace of development and evolution for our work on the community platform. - - Red Hat is offering to sponsor some of the buildsystem and initial content delivery resources - how we are able to consume these and when we are able to make use of this is to be decided. - - Sources that we consume, in the platform, in the addons, or the parallel stacks such as Xen4CentOS will become easier to consume with a git.centos.org being setup, with the scripts and rpm metadata needed to create binaries being published there. The Board also aims to put together a plan to allow groups to come together within the CentOS ecosystem as a Special Interest Group (SIG) and build CentOS Variants on our resources, as officially endorsed. You can read about the proposal at http://www.centos.org/variants/ - - Because we are now able to work with the Red Hat legal teams, some of the contraints that resulted in efforts like CentOS-QA being behind closed doors, now go away and we hope to have the entire build, test, and delivery chain open to anyone who wishes to come and join the effort. The changes we make are going to be community inclusive, and promoted, proposed, formalised, and actioned in an open community centric manner on the centos-devel mailing list. And I highly encourage everyone to come along and participate. - - Contacting us works best via the established community mechanisms. - - Real time chats via IRC (
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 21:09 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation beyond the platform into the next generation of emerging technologies. Working alongside the Fedora and RHEL ecosystems, we hope to further expand on the community offerings by providing a platform that is easily consumed, by other projects to promote their code while we maintain the established base. Essentially Red Hat is slowly taking over and developing/assisting Centos to be a more regular and structure organisation. The fact that Red Hat now owns the Centos brand worries me but that's life. Absolutely nothing remains static. Centos was created by many ordinary people to whom I am very grateful. Its a really great operating system. I genuinely like it, hence I abandoned M$ completely about 5 years ago and have never regretted it. I just wish I had migrated to Centos many years earlier. Red Hat will gain commercially from their de facto take-over. One of the general beneficial effects will be bringing Linux into the vast mainstream of everyday computing and attracting (or should that be enticing?) M$ business users. Working as a single team with Red Hat will inevitably mean speedier updates for Centos users. I love Linux and want this merger to succeed. I'm patiently waiting for Centos on my Cube (Android) tablet. Happy New Year. -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here. EXIM: chlothar.bnv-bamberg.de = 217.146.130.222 but HELO bnv-bamberg.de has no IP address ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation beyond the platform into the next generation of emerging technologies. Wow. I'm not entirely sure this is good news. We'll see. Yves Bellefeuille ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Odd problems with CR updates
Thanks, that was the solution for me too Scott Robbins scottro@... writes: I may have solved this. As I was doing CR updates in bits and pieces, I think I installed nss-softokn and didn't install nss-softokn-freebl. Installing both at the same time seems to have fixed the issue. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 21:09 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation beyond the platform into the next generation of emerging technologies. Working alongside the Fedora and RHEL ecosystems, we hope to further expand on the community offerings by providing a platform that is easily consumed, by other projects to promote their code while we maintain the established base. But there is more to Red Hat's de facto take-over including the imposition of USA's domestic law on citizens all around the world. The compulsory imposition of USA law on all Centos downloaders creates the possibility of being arrested in one's home country and sent to the USA for a criminal trial. A few people in Britain have been extradited to the USA for criminal trials for matters which are not criminal in Britain. Can anyone remember seeing this on the old Centos ? http://www.centos.org/legal/ Export Regulations By downloading CentOS software, you acknowledge that you understand all of the following: CentOS software and technical information may be subject to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (the “EAR”) and other U.S. and foreign laws and may not be exported, re-exported or transferred (a) to any country listed in Country Group E:1 in Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the EAR (currently, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan Syria); (b) to any prohibited destination or to any end user who has been prohibited from participating in U.S. export transactions by any federal agency of the U.S. government; or (c) for use in connection with the design, development or production of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, or rocket systems, space launch vehicles, or sounding rockets, or unmanned air vehicle systems. You may not download CentOS software or technical information if you are located in one of these countries or otherwise subject to these restrictions. You may not provide CentOS software or technical information to individuals or entities located in one of these countries or otherwise subject to these restrictions. You are also responsible for compliance with foreign law requirements applicable to the import, export and use of CentOS software and technical information. This is a Community mantained site. Red Hat, Inc is not responsible for its content. -- -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:04:29AM +, Always Learning wrote: The compulsory imposition of USA law on all Centos downloaders creates the possibility of being arrested in one's home country and sent to the [...] Can anyone remember seeing this on the old Centos ? By downloading CentOS software, you acknowledge that you understand all of the following: CentOS software and technical information may be subject to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (the ???EAR???) and Whether this was there, before, is irrelevant. If the software was subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page stating it. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] EL7 mirror: There is no installed groups file.
I installed the RHEL 7 beta here to test while waiting for CentOS 7 to arrive. On noticing that yum didn't work, I decided to set up a local mirror. I rsync'd ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages/ to a local web server here, then regenerated the repodata directory with createrepo. Now yum works fine, for the most part. yum search foo pulls up a plausible list of packages, yum install bar chases dependencies as expected, etc. Unfortunately, yum groupinstall isn't working, which means I have no easy way to install Gnome on my minimal EL7 installation. Apparently I need some kind of groups file to feed to createrepo --groupfile, but I don't know where to get one, or how to construct one. I've dug around on ftp.redhat.com and can't find anything that looks plausible. I've tried manually installing packages to build up this GNOME desktop, but despite installing dozens of things, startx still doesn't give me something usable. I know I could get a GNOME desktop by reinstalling the OS, but that would wipe out a lot of the local work I've done on this VM so far. The only reason I need X in the first place is that system-config-printer no longer runs in text mode. (I'm trying to set up a CUPS server. So yeah, X11 is a prerequisite for installing a printer now. Lovely.) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 20:14 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: If the software was subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page stating it. [EAR = USA's Export Administration Regulations] How would a mere downloader from a mirror, or a purchaser of a Centos disk or even a beneficiary of a free Centos disk at a Centos event beware of USA law restrictions and understand the full legal implications of USA law ? Its reminiscent of the PGP farce from nearly 20? years ago. With Google slowly removing, or not updating, the open source bits of Android and replacing them by closed sources, will the same commercial strategy emerge from Red Hat into Centos ? -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On 07/01/14 08:27 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 20:14 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: If the software was subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page stating it. [EAR = USA's Export Administration Regulations] How would a mere downloader from a mirror, or a purchaser of a Centos disk or even a beneficiary of a free Centos disk at a Centos event beware of USA law restrictions and understand the full legal implications of USA law ? Its reminiscent of the PGP farce from nearly 20? years ago. With Google slowly removing, or not updating, the open source bits of Android and replacing them by closed sources, will the same commercial strategy emerge from Red Hat into Centos ? RH has a long history of being a benevolent supporter of 3rd party projects under their umbrella. Look at Fedora, Gluster, KVM, etc. What RH did was guarantee the long term health and sustainability of the CentOS community. They've provided that same community access to tremendous resources, both technical and human, to grow and maintain the project. Red Hat's benefit is that they help grow the community of EL users. A very many paid RHEL users got their start with CentOS. They've given CentOS instant corporate credibility that will help grow that incubator user base even further, increasing the pool of users who might one day grow into needing commercial support. They're building the foundation for their future customer base. I am very confident that this will prove to be a very good thing for both CentOS and RH. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:27:49AM +, Always Learning wrote: On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 20:14 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: If the software was subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page stating it. [EAR = USA's Export Administration Regulations] How would a mere downloader from a mirror, or a purchaser of a Centos disk or even a beneficiary of a free Centos disk at a Centos event beware of USA law restrictions and understand the full legal implications of USA law ? You're missing the point. This is not RedHat causing [t]he compulsory imposition of USA law on all Centos downloaders (your words); that imposition _already existed_ regardless of a web page telling you. The difference, now is that you're told about it (presumably standard RedHat legal boiler template 'cos RH lawyers believe it adds some protection to _them_ - and thus the CentOS board - by having it there). The legal situation for downloaders _has not changed_ by the presence of that section on the web site (and the page has even less importance considering you can download the DVDs without even having to see that page; it's not an agreement you sign or click through). Its reminiscent of the PGP farce from nearly 20? years ago. It's the same farce. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 05:14 AM, Digimer wrote: Fantastic news! CentOS and RHEL have been mutually beneficial projects for years. As a user of both, I am extremely happy to see the ties grow between the communities. digimer Centos for the desktop! RHEL for the backend! Okay, I'm done frothing. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On 01/07/2014 07:21 PM, Always Learning wrote: I'm patiently waiting for Centos on my Cube (Android) tablet. What ARM ver? Is there Fedora for it? This takes lots of time, but f20 works on a lot of ARMv7 units. Now what ver of RH will that map into? :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On 1/7/2014 8:04 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 01/07/2014 07:21 PM, Always Learning wrote: I'm patiently waiting for Centos on my Cube (Android) tablet. What ARM ver? Is there Fedora for it? This takes lots of time, but f20 works on a lot of ARMv7 units. Now what ver of RH will that map into? of course, tablets also require touch pad support, and a touch-oriented UI... trying to use a mouse interface with a touch pad is an exercise in frustration -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On 01/07/2014 08:38 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:27:49AM +, Always Learning wrote: On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 20:14 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: If the software was subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page stating it. [EAR = USA's Export Administration Regulations] How would a mere downloader from a mirror, or a purchaser of a Centos disk or even a beneficiary of a free Centos disk at a Centos event beware of USA law restrictions and understand the full legal implications of USA law ? You're missing the point. This is not RedHat causing [t]he compulsory imposition of USA law on all Centos downloaders (your words); that imposition _already existed_ regardless of a web page telling you. The difference, now is that you're told about it (presumably standard RedHat legal boiler template 'cos RH lawyers believe it adds some protection to _them_ - and thus the CentOS board - by having it there). The legal situation for downloaders _has not changed_ by the presence of that section on the web site (and the page has even less importance considering you can download the DVDs without even having to see that page; it's not an agreement you sign or click through). Its reminiscent of the PGP farce from nearly 20? years ago. It's the same farce. No. That was ITAR, and no farce. ITAR is very proscriptive, and only the loophole on printed algorithms allowed PGPv3 to be shipped out legally. It took us some time, but we finally weakened ITAR. I remember well, as I was running the IPsec international interoperablity work back then and had a major hand in showing the non-enforceablity of ITAR wrt cryptography as munitions. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On 01/07/2014 11:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/7/2014 8:04 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 01/07/2014 07:21 PM, Always Learning wrote: I'm patiently waiting for Centos on my Cube (Android) tablet. What ARM ver? Is there Fedora for it? This takes lots of time, but f20 works on a lot of ARMv7 units. Now what ver of RH will that map into? of course, tablets also require touch pad support, and a touch-oriented UI... trying to use a mouse interface with a touch pad is an exercise in frustration f20 with g3.10. Supposedly. Is that what you want for Centos 8? But Centos on ARM blades. Yes, please. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] grub color on C6 (not)
On 12/20/2013 03:55 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ted Miller Sent: den 17 december 2013 05:19 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] grub color on C6 (not) I have tried more than half a dozen different combinations of the color command in my grub.conf file, and see nothing but black and white. Is there * a problem with the Centos grub command? * a problem with grub figuring out how to do color on my hardware? * a true-false day, when everything is either true or false, no in between grays, and no color? Was this resolved? I'm seeing the same thing. -- //Sorin Not resolved. Ted ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
