Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-26 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Am 23.10.09 19:56, schrieb Ian Murray:
 
 The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created.  Therefore, 
 if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found with it in QA, 
 then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct.  The ISOs are based 
 on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat released 
 after the initial release of RHEL 5.4.  
 
 As far as I remember, some subsequent RH updates are rolled-into the CentOS 
 release. Someone more familiar with the build process may clarify that.

No, they aren't. This time we pushed the 0day updates from Red Hat to
the 5.3 tree (new kernel and a few other things).

The ISOs have the same software in the same versions as upstrem has,
we're not slipstreaming anything into there.

Ralph
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-26 Thread Alejandro
Here has all the Direct Link to the different version of Centos 5.4

http://www.linuxiso.com.ar/centos/

Regards,
Ale

2009/10/26 Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com

 Am 23.10.09 19:56, schrieb Ian Murray:
 
  The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created.
  Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found
 with it in QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct.  The
 ISOs are based on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red
 Hat released after the initial release of RHEL 5.4.
 
  As far as I remember, some subsequent RH updates are rolled-into the
 CentOS release. Someone more familiar with the build process may clarify
 that.

 No, they aren't. This time we pushed the 0day updates from Red Hat to
 the 5.3 tree (new kernel and a few other things).

 The ISOs have the same software in the same versions as upstrem has,
 we're not slipstreaming anything into there.

 Ralph
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-25 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 9:31 AM, mark m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 David Suhendrik wrote:
  Still waiting for DVD 5.4 64 bit

 There's a couple of mirrors that have it. I looked through several .edu
 site -
 I think RIT had one.

mark


The Clarkson mirror also carries the DVDs.

http://mirror.clarkson.edu/centos/5/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso


Matt

--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10

mccar...@gmail.com
mccar...@clarkson.edu
1-518-314-9214
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-24 Thread Robert Nichols
David Suhendrik wrote:
 Still waiting for DVD 5.4 64 bit
 

Have you been looking, or just expecting a DVD to show up in your
mailbox??  Go to the CentOS homepage, http://www.centos.org/ .
At the top of the page you'll see CentOS Download Information.
Click on CentOS-5 ISOs, then on x86_64.  Many of the mirrors
listed have CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso available for direct
download.  All of them have CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent
available.  Bittorrent is the preferred download method.  Right
now the torrent has more seeds (398) than downloaders (218),
so you'll likely saturate your download bandwidth right away.


-- 
Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address.
 Do NOT delete it.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-24 Thread Majian
There has something useful for you:
The CentOS 5.4 ISO DVD path is:

   DVD:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.4/isos/i386/CentOS-5.4-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.4/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent

Hope it would help you~~~



On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 I admit I wasn't following the screaming and yelling about 5.4, so excuse
 me if this has been answered

 My boss tells me he wants me to start rolling out 5.4. I want to d/l 
 burn a DVD... but when I looked at a number of mirrors, the .iso is from 1
 Oct, while the CD .iso's are from the 14th... yet 5.4 was officially
 announced the other day.

 Am I missing something, or do the mirrors have a pre-release DVD .iso,
 with no fixes in the last three weeks, or ...?

   mark

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-24 Thread mark
David Suhendrik wrote:
 Still waiting for DVD 5.4 64 bit

There's a couple of mirrors that have it. I looked through several .edu site - 
I think RIT had one.

mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-23 Thread m . roth
I admit I wasn't following the screaming and yelling about 5.4, so excuse
me if this has been answered

My boss tells me he wants me to start rolling out 5.4. I want to d/l 
burn a DVD... but when I looked at a number of mirrors, the .iso is from 1
Oct, while the CD .iso's are from the 14th... yet 5.4 was officially
announced the other day.

Am I missing something, or do the mirrors have a pre-release DVD .iso,
with no fixes in the last three weeks, or ...?

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-23 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 I admit I wasn't following the screaming and yelling about 5.4, so excuse
 me if this has been answered

 My boss tells me he wants me to start rolling out 5.4. I want to d/l 
 burn a DVD... but when I looked at a number of mirrors, the .iso is from 1
 Oct, while the CD .iso's are from the 14th... yet 5.4 was officially
 announced the other day.

 Am I missing something, or do the mirrors have a pre-release DVD .iso,
 with no fixes in the last three weeks, or ...?

   mark


The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created.  Therefore,
if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found with it in QA,
then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct.  The ISOs are based
on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat released
after the initial release of RHEL 5.4.

HTH,
Matt
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-23 Thread m . roth
Matt wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 I admit I wasn't following the screaming and yelling about 5.4, so
 excuse  me if this has been answered

 My boss tells me he wants me to start rolling out 5.4. I want to d/l 
 burn a DVD... but when I looked at a number of mirrors, the .iso is from
 1 Oct, while the CD .iso's are from the 14th... yet 5.4 was officially
 announced the other day.

 Am I missing something, or do the mirrors have a pre-release DVD .iso,
 with no fixes in the last three weeks, or ...?

 The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created.
 Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found
with it in
 QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct.  The ISOs are
 based
 on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat released
 after the initial release of RHEL 5.4.

But why are the 7-iso set of CD's from two weeks later? Or is it just that
folks felt that building those was more important than rebuilding the DVD
version?

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-23 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
 But why are the 7-iso set of CD's from two weeks later? Or is it just that
 folks felt that building those was more important than rebuilding the DVD
 version?

  mark


Looking at the dates for the ISOs on the mirror I maintain, they are all
from Oct. 1st or 2nd.  Only the torrent files are from two weeks later.

http://mirror.clarkson.edu/centos/5/isos/i386/
http://mirror.clarkson.edu/centos/5/isos/x86_64/

--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10

mccar...@gmail.com
mccar...@clarkson.edu
1-518-314-9214
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-23 Thread Robert


m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 Matt wrote:
   
 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 
 I admit I wasn't following the screaming and yelling about 5.4, so
 excuse  me if this has been answered

 My boss tells me he wants me to start rolling out 5.4. I want to d/l 
 burn a DVD... but when I looked at a number of mirrors, the .iso is from
 1 Oct, while the CD .iso's are from the 14th... yet 5.4 was officially
 announced the other day.

 Am I missing something, or do the mirrors have a pre-release DVD .iso,
 with no fixes in the last three weeks, or ...?

   
 The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created.
 Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found
 
 with it in
   
 QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct.  The ISOs are
 based
 on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat released
 after the initial release of RHEL 5.4.
 

 But why are the 7-iso set of CD's from two weeks later? Or is it just that
 folks felt that building those was more important than rebuilding the DVD
 version?

   mark
   
Dates aside, the official Release Notes at
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4 contains
checksums for each of the isos.  It seems to me that you should
be able to apply those md5 and sha1 sums to the DVD.iso file, no
matter the source, and be reasonably comfortable with the result.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-23 Thread Ian Murray

The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created.  Therefore, 
if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found with it in QA, 
then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct.  The ISOs are based on 
the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat released after 
the initial release of RHEL 5.4.  

As far as I remember, some subsequent RH updates are rolled-into the CentOS 
release. Someone more familiar with the build process may clarify that.



  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-23 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:


 The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created.
  Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found
 with it in QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct.  The
 ISOs are based on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red
 Hat released after the initial release of RHEL 5.4.

 As far as I remember, some subsequent RH updates are rolled-into the CentOS
 release. Someone more familiar with the build process may clarify that.



You could be right.  I didn't think they were but I'm not incredibly
familiar with the entire rebuild process.

Matt

--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10

mccar...@gmail.com
mccar...@clarkson.edu
1-518-314-9214
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-23 Thread mark
Robert wrote:
 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 Matt wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 
 I admit I wasn't following the screaming and yelling about 5.4, so
 excuse  me if this has been answered

 My boss tells me he wants me to start rolling out 5.4. I want to d/l 
 burn a DVD... but when I looked at a number of mirrors, the .iso is from
 1 Oct, while the CD .iso's are from the 14th... yet 5.4 was officially
 announced the other day.

 Am I missing something, or do the mirrors have a pre-release DVD .iso,
 with no fixes in the last three weeks, or ...?
   
 The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created.
 Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found
 with it in
   
 QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct.  The ISOs are
 based on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat 
 released
 after the initial release of RHEL 5.4.
 
 But why are the 7-iso set of CD's from two weeks later? Or is it just that
 folks felt that building those was more important than rebuilding the DVD
 version?
   
 Dates aside, the official Release Notes at
 http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4 contains
 checksums for each of the isos.  It seems to me that you should
 be able to apply those md5 and sha1 sums to the DVD.iso file, no
 matter the source, and be reasonably comfortable with the result.

Already did all that - I was trying to minimize updates, since we'll be using 
the DVD for a while

mark
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 


-- 
Have you noticed that, when we were young, we were told
that everybody else is doing it was a really stupid
reason to do something, but now it's the standard reason
for picking a particular software package? -- Barry Gehm
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD

2009-10-23 Thread David Suhendrik
Still waiting for DVD 5.4 64 bit


Regards,
David

./nobody


mark wrote:
 Robert wrote:
   
 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 
 Matt wrote:
   
 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 
 
 I admit I wasn't following the screaming and yelling about 5.4, so
 excuse  me if this has been answered

 My boss tells me he wants me to start rolling out 5.4. I want to d/l 
 burn a DVD... but when I looked at a number of mirrors, the .iso is from
 1 Oct, while the CD .iso's are from the 14th... yet 5.4 was officially
 announced the other day.

 Am I missing something, or do the mirrors have a pre-release DVD .iso,
 with no fixes in the last three weeks, or ...?
   
   
 The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created.
 Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found
 
 with it in
   
   
 QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct.  The ISOs are
 based on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat 
 released
 after the initial release of RHEL 5.4.
 
 
 But why are the 7-iso set of CD's from two weeks later? Or is it just that
 folks felt that building those was more important than rebuilding the DVD
 version?
   
   
 Dates aside, the official Release Notes at
 http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4 contains
 checksums for each of the isos.  It seems to me that you should
 be able to apply those md5 and sha1 sums to the DVD.iso file, no
 matter the source, and be reasonably comfortable with the result.
 

 Already did all that - I was trying to minimize updates, since we'll be using 
 the DVD for a while

   mark
   
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 


   
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos