Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-24 Thread Tatman, Robert

 -Caveat Lector-

The human brain has receptors for an astounding number of substances and
phenomena, which science is just beginning to realize. There are receptors
for morphine, Prozac, nicotine, alcohol, for ecstasy, both physical and
aesthetic; there are receptors that are so multiply-redundant that the brain
looks like an engineer's kludge. The surprising thing is not that there is a
"God module" or "God receptor." It would be surprising if it were *not*
there and we were really only talking to the other side of our brains.
What's surprising is that it took so long for science to accept something
that the rest of humanity has known for thousands of years. This does not
"prove" the truth of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, S*ientology, or
the Church of the SubGenius. What it *does* demonstrate is that the human
race is hardwired to look beyond itself, beyond the reality of the normal
senses, for answers to its questions about the meaning of existence. It also
suggests a hard, physiological reason for the parallels in religious
experience between traditions radically different in belief and practice.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, December 24, 1999 3:12 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

  -Caveat Lector-

 Kris Millegan wrote:
 
   Fairytales.
  Om
  k

Brain researchers find 'God module'
Los Angeles Times
[re-post]

 NEW ORLEANS -- No one knows why humanity felt its first religious
 stirrings, but researchers at University of California, San Diego,
 reported
 Tuesday that the human brain may be hard-wired to hear the voice of
 heaven.

snip

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-24 Thread Nurev Ind Research

 -Caveat Lector-

"Tatman, Robert" wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 The human brain has receptors for an astounding number of substances and
 phenomena, which science is just beginning to realize. There are receptors
 for morphine, Prozac, nicotine, alcohol, for ecstasy, both physical and
 aesthetic; there are receptors that are so multiply-redundant that the brain
 looks like an engineer's kludge. The surprising thing is not that there is a
 "God module" or "God receptor." It would be surprising if it were *not*
 there and we were really only talking to the other side of our brains.

Even with the *god module* who says that's not the case? The possible
existence of *god receptors* in the brain only indicates that there was a
long-standing biological need for the species to BELIEVE in a supernatural
Big Daddy. It says nothing about whether or not such a being really exists.

 What's surprising is that it took so long for science to accept something
 that the rest of humanity has known for thousands of years.

Science does not yet accept this hypothesis. It is not a fact. It is only
speculation at this point. The rest of humanity hasn't known shit for
thousands of years. Early humans lived in a fearful world of real and imagined
dangers. A brain mechanism for the reduction of terror and stress was clearly
warranted.

Don't get carried away here. It took a long time for
humans to break away from religious supernaturalism enough to establish the
sciences, and even today, Kansans think that creationism is in the same ball
park as evolution. This is due to the negative effects of a vestigial * god
module.*

 This does not
 "prove" the truth of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, S*ientology, or
 the Church of the SubGenius.

On the contrary. It proves that they are absurd concoctions generated by a part
of the brain that not only no longer serves a positive biological function,
but has now become a hindrance to further evolution. Like the vestigial
appendix.

 What it *does* demonstrate is that the human
 race is hardwired to look beyond itself, beyond the reality of the normal
 senses, for answers to its questions about the meaning of existence.

Oh really? Do you think that Neanderthals and early Homo Sapiens had that kind
of sophistication as far back as 60,000 or 100,000 years ago? Not bloody
likely. It is more likely that the early ones buried there dead ceremonially
with trinkets because they simply did not want death to be final. JUST LIKE
TODAY.

 It also
 suggests a hard, physiological reason for the parallels in religious
 experience between traditions radically different in belief and practice.

Not at all. It only suggests that all ( most ) people still need to invent
a buffer to deal with the harsher aspects of life and death.


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, December 24, 1999 3:12 AM
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
 
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  Kris Millegan wrote:
  
Fairytales.
   Om
   k
 
 Brain researchers find 'God module'
 Los Angeles Times
 [re-post]
 
  NEW ORLEANS -- No one knows why humanity felt its first religious
  stirrings, but researchers at University of California, San Diego,
  reported
  Tuesday that the human brain may be hard-wired to hear the voice of
  heaven.
 
 snip

The last sentence here is VERY presumptuous. There is evidence for hardwiring
but none for voices from heaven.

Joshua2

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-23 Thread pmeares

 -Caveat Lector-

Kris Millegan wrote:

  Fairytales.
 Om
 k

   Brain researchers find 'God module'
   Los Angeles Times
   [re-post]

NEW ORLEANS -- No one knows why humanity felt its first religious
stirrings, but researchers at University of California, San Diego, reported
Tuesday that the human brain may be hard-wired to hear the voice of heaven.

In an experiment with patients suffering from an unusual form of epilepsy,
researchers at the UC San Diego brain and perception laboratory determined
that the parts of the brain's temporal lobe -- which the scientists dubbed
the "God module" -- may affect how intensely a person responds to religious
beliefs. The researchers said the experiment was the first effort to
address the neural basis of religious expression.

People suffering this type of seizure have reported intense mystical and
religious experiences as part of their attacks but also are usually
preoccupied with mystical thoughts between seizures. That led the
researchers to use the patients as a way of investigating the relationship
between the physical structure of the brain and spiritual experiences.

The researchers determined that one effect of the patients' seizures was to
strengthen their brain's involuntary response to religious words, which led
the scientists to suggest a portion of the brain was attuned to ideas about
a supreme being.

"It is not clear why such dedicated neural machinery ... for religion may
have evolved," the team reported Tuesday at a meeting of the Society for
Neuroscience in New Orleans. One possibility, the scientists suggested, was
to encourage tribe loyalty or reinforce kinship ties or the stability of a
closely knit clan.

The scientists emphasized that their findings in no way suggest that
religion is simply a matter of brain chemistry. "These studies do not in
any way negate the validity of religious experience or God," the team
cautioned. "They merely provide an explanation in terms of brain regions
that may be involved."

Until recently, most neuroscientists confined their inquiries to research
aimed at alleviating the medical problems that affect the brain's health
and to attempts to fathom its fundamental neural mechanisms.

Emboldened by their growing understanding of how the brain works, however,
scientists now dare to investigate the relationship between the brain,
human consciousness and intangible mental experiences.

Craig Kinsely, an expert in psychology and neuroscience at the University
of Richmond in Virginia, said: "People have been tickling around the edges
of consciousness, and this sort of research plunges in. There is the
quandary of whether the mind created God or God created the mind. This is
going to shake people up, but (any conclusion) is very premature."

Vilayanur Ramachandran, the senior scientist involved in the experiment and
the director of the center for brain and cognition at UC San Diego, said,
"We are skating on thin ice. We are only starting to look at this. The
exciting thing is that you can even begin to contemplate scientific
experiments on the neural basis of religion and God."

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-21 Thread Tatman, Robert

 -Caveat Lector-

Plus which, the entire marriage was a metaphor, symbolizing God's continuing
convenant with Israel despite the people's habit of whoring after false
gods. Hosea was typical of the Yahwist prophets in seeking to focus worship
solely on one supreme deity. While Eagle1's point is technically correct
(okay, it should have been fornication rather than adultery, but who's
counting?), Hosea presented himself as a type of Israel, so that when asked
"Why did you marry a whore?" he could say, "Because the people of Israel
have done exactly this by lusting after Asherah in her high places."

 -Original Message-
 From: YnrChyldzWyld [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, December 18, 1999 8:49 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

  -Caveat Lector-

 On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Eagle 1 wrote:
 There is a difference between "sin" and "disobedience".
 The two are not equal; nor do they have the same connotations.
 Example: God ordered Hosea to marry a whore - Hosea 1:2.  He "obeyed" ...
 but technically, he "sinned", because he became party to a "sin" of the
 flesh,  which was 'adultry'.

 Wrong.  Adultery (try learning how to spell it correctly) according to
 the Bible, is sexual relations between a man and a woman who are both
 married to someone else.  If only one partner is married, only that
 person is committing adultery.  An unmarried person cannot commit
 adultery, neither is sexual intercourse between a man and a woman who are
 legally married to each other adultery.

 Hosea was legally married to the whore, therefore he could not be
 committing adultery when he had sexual relations with her.  Neither was
 she an adulteress when having sexual relations with Hosea.  And the fact
 that she was able to legally marry Hosea suggests that she was not
 married to another man, therefore even when she made a living as a whore,
 SHE did not commit adultery, even tho a client may have been married.  It
 would have been her married clients who were adulterers...


 June ;-)

 |===SEASONS===GREETINGS==|
 | \ /|
 |  *~o)   )_ )_ )_  )_   - * -   |
 |   |`--) ,  ,_),_),_),_/ / \|
 |  ``^^^``   /~\/~\/~\/~\|
 ||
 | / / /   |  |
 |   \ /  ((((((  -+- |
 |  - * -.-#--..-#-..--#-. |  |
 |   /|\/__\  /_\  /__\   /-\ |
 |__//|\\| []  [] || [] [] || []  [] |___/---\___ldb__|

 artist -SheDragon (Laura) (ldb)

 *---*
 revcoal AT connix DOT com
 *---*
  It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
  address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
  $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
  email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
  terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
  unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
  email.
 **

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
 propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are sordid
 matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
 outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
 effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
 readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy

Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-21 Thread Eagle 1

 -Caveat Lector-

Robert,
Thank you for that excellent minimized summary of the situation. You're
right,  who is counting?  (In my book the two equate... on the bottom line,
anyway. They still result in the same act.)

Yes,  God is not happy with the continued following of and worshipping of
other gods.  This action on the part of Hosea was also symbollic and type
for the last days,  when the habits of most show to have lost their sense of
direction and who follow after strange gods, strange flesh, and other
doctrinal "philosophies" that are directly contrary and replaced in the
stead of the Covenant that God has made with Israel from generation to
generation to the end of this earth age.

eagle 1

- Original Message -
From: "Tatman, Robert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 Plus which, the entire marriage was a metaphor, symbolizing God's
continuing
 convenant with Israel despite the people's habit of whoring after false
 gods. Hosea was typical of the Yahwist prophets in seeking to focus
worship
 solely on one supreme deity. While Eagle1's point is technically correct
 (okay, it should have been fornication rather than adultery, but who's
 counting?), Hosea presented himself as a type of Israel, so that when
asked
 "Why did you marry a whore?" he could say, "Because the people of Israel
 have done exactly this by lusting after Asherah in her high places."

  -Original Message-
  From: YnrChyldzWyld [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Saturday, December 18, 1999 8:49 AM
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
 
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Eagle 1 wrote:
  There is a difference between "sin" and "disobedience".
  The two are not equal; nor do they have the same connotations.
  Example: God ordered Hosea to marry a whore - Hosea 1:2.  He "obeyed"
...
  but technically, he "sinned", because he became party to a "sin" of the
  flesh,  which was 'adultry'.
 
  Wrong.  Adultery (try learning how to spell it correctly) according to
  the Bible, is sexual relations between a man and a woman who are both
  married to someone else.  If only one partner is married, only that
  person is committing adultery.  An unmarried person cannot commit
  adultery, neither is sexual intercourse between a man and a woman who
are
  legally married to each other adultery.
 
  Hosea was legally married to the whore, therefore he could not be
  committing adultery when he had sexual relations with her.  Neither was
  she an adulteress when having sexual relations with Hosea.  And the fact
  that she was able to legally marry Hosea suggests that she was not
  married to another man, therefore even when she made a living as a
whore,
  SHE did not commit adultery, even tho a client may have been married.
It
  would have been her married clients who were adulterers...
 
 
  June ;-)

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-21 Thread Tatman, Robert

 -Caveat Lector-

"Religious science fiction," bordering on heresy if it wasn't in the
Bible... ISTM that there are an awful lot of supposed "Christians" who spend
more time contemplating the Devil or angels or saints or anything other than
Jesus Christ.

 -Original Message-
 From: Kris Millegan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Sunday, December 19, 1999 1:07 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

  -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 12/19/99 9:15:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 (Still LOL about satan under the little tiles...  that's funny!)
 If it matters,  Satan is alive and well and being held in heaven until
 Michael releases him for a very special purpose... which you can read
 about
 by going to your Bible,  2 Thessalonians 2:1-12). (And contrary to
 popular
 belief,  satan has never seen the sights of any place called 'hell', as
 of
 yet.  He has a more special place for his demise).
 

  Fairytales.
 Om
 k



DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-19 Thread YnrChyldzWyld

 -Caveat Lector-

On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Eagle 1 wrote:
I vary to differ with you.
IF the woman Hosea married, ever had relations with a married client during
the course of her business, she became an adultress. That title, or "sin",
is never removed, except by the grace or pardon of God.

Perhaps...but 'adultery', as defined in the Bible itself, is an act that
only married people can commit...adultery is cheating on one's spouse.
An unmarried person cannot, by the Bible's own definition, be an
adulterer or adulteress...although they may be guilty of fornication...
even if they have sexual relations with a person who is married.  The
married person is guilty of adultery, their unmarried person is guilty of
fornication, not adultery (since by being single, they cannot commit
adultery by the Bible's definiton of the word).

Even The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines adultery as:  sexual
unfaithfulness of a married person.

So you see, an unmarried person is incapable of committing adultery
(altho they may be guilty of causing another person to commit it).


So, in other words, I disagree.
I will leave it at that.

Well, you can disagree all you want, it doesn't change the FACTS of the
matter...which includes the fact that you display great ignorance and
little research in these matters.


June ;-)

*---*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*---*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
 address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
 $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
 email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
 terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
 unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
 email.
**

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-19 Thread YnrChyldzWyld

 -Caveat Lector-

On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Eagle 1 wrote:
Well then,  with all that said...
It stands to reason that the Biblical account of Lucifer's beauty should
also be considered.  In Genesis he was called the "Serpent", the most
subtile of all the beasts... (this includes man).

Can you tell me what dictionary you find the word 'subtile' in?  And just
what its definition is?

Sounds to me that you are telling us that Satan is below the little
squares of ceramic on our bathroom floors, as part of the subflooring?


June ;-)

|===SEASONS===GREETINGS==|
| \ /|
|  *~o)   )_ )_ )_  )_   - * -   |
|   |`--) ,  ,_),_),_),_/ / \|
|  ``^^^``   /~\/~\/~\/~\|
||
| / / /   |  |
|   \ /  ((((((  -+- |
|  - * -.-#--..-#-..--#-. |  |
|   /|\/__\  /_\  /__\   /-\ |
|__//|\\| []  [] || [] [] || []  [] |___/---\___ldb__|

artist -SheDragon (Laura) (ldb)

*---*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*---*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
 address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
 $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
 email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
 terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
 unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
 email.
**

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-19 Thread Nurev Ind Research

 -Caveat Lector-

Terry Trainor wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 CTRL is not the proper forum, so I will not go into detail concerning
 your several statements here.  Needless to say, I am not of the school
 of J, P, Q, or any of that other modern crud.  But your last statement
 I simply cannot let pass without comment.

  -Original Message-
  From: Tatman, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 12:01 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
 

 Kerschnip

  Indeed, there is some evidence that
  Jesus deliberately
  sought to embody *all* of the many different messianic images
  found in the
  Hebrew Scriptures.

 Like deliberately being born of a virgin?
 like deliberately seeking to be nailed to a cross Between two thieves?
 Like deliberately seeking to have a sword rammed into his side?
 Like deliberately dying?
 Like deliberately being resurrected by God the Father?

 Gee - some guys will do ANYTHING for fame, huh?

This is absurd. These examples you give are the RESULTS of retrofitting
the mythological Jesus by taking " prophesies " out of the ( Jewish ) Bible
and making Him seem to fit. The NT writers made so many stupid and
contradictory mistakes doing this, that the resulting Jesus is one that
only a desperate or non thinking true believer can believe.

For a book full of examples, see " Gospel Fictions " by Randel Helms.

Joshua2

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-19 Thread Eagle 1

 -Caveat Lector-

ROTFL - June!
The word defined was not "subtile",  it was "Serpent" from the Genesis 3
account. And the definition can be found in the Strong's Exhaustive
Concordance of the Bible - version 1978.

(Still LOL about satan under the little tiles...  that's funny!)
If it matters,  Satan is alive and well and being held in heaven until
Michael releases him for a very special purpose... which you can read about
by going to your Bible,  2 Thessalonians 2:1-12). (And contrary to popular
belief,  satan has never seen the sights of any place called 'hell', as of
yet.  He has a more special place for his demise).

eagle 1

- Original Message -
From: "YnrChyldzWyld" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 1999 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Eagle 1 wrote:
 Well then,  with all that said...
 It stands to reason that the Biblical account of Lucifer's beauty should
 also be considered.  In Genesis he was called the "Serpent", the most
 subtile of all the beasts... (this includes man).

 Can you tell me what dictionary you find the word 'subtile' in?  And just
 what its definition is?

 Sounds to me that you are telling us that Satan is below the little
 squares of ceramic on our bathroom floors, as part of the subflooring?


 June

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-19 Thread Kris Millegan

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/19/99 9:15:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

(Still LOL about satan under the little tiles...  that's funny!)
If it matters,  Satan is alive and well and being held in heaven until
Michael releases him for a very special purpose... which you can read about
by going to your Bible,  2 Thessalonians 2:1-12). (And contrary to popular
belief,  satan has never seen the sights of any place called 'hell', as
of
yet.  He has a more special place for his demise).


 Fairytales.
Om
k

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-19 Thread Tenorlove

 -Caveat Lector-

Genesis 3:1 KJV. Subtil, not subtile. Archaic spelling of subtle.

Tenorlove
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus to Eagle

1999-12-19 Thread KDS

 -Caveat Lector-

I'm curious where it says in the Bible, that Michael releases satan who is
confined in Heaven??? I know that II Thess. is about the coming apostasia--or
falling away, but it has always been my understanding that satan is given rule of
the world up until  the end of the 7 yr. tribulation period...example would be
when he tempted Jesus in the wilderness and offered him everything, which he could
not have had it not been his to give..just wondering
ks
Eagle 1 wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 ROTFL - June!
 The word defined was not "subtile",  it was "Serpent" from the Genesis 3
 account. And the definition can be found in the Strong's Exhaustive
 Concordance of the Bible - version 1978.

 (Still LOL about satan under the little tiles...  that's funny!)
 If it matters,  Satan is alive and well and being held in heaven until
 Michael releases him for a very special purpose... which you can read about
 by going to your Bible,  2 Thessalonians 2:1-12). (And contrary to popular
 belief,  satan has never seen the sights of any place called 'hell', as of
 yet.  He has a more special place for his demise).

 eagle 1

 - Original Message -
 From: "YnrChyldzWyld" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, December 19, 1999 8:15 AM
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

  -Caveat Lector-
 
  On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Eagle 1 wrote:
  Well then,  with all that said...
  It stands to reason that the Biblical account of Lucifer's beauty should
  also be considered.  In Genesis he was called the "Serpent", the most
  subtile of all the beasts... (this includes man).
 
  Can you tell me what dictionary you find the word 'subtile' in?  And just
  what its definition is?
 
  Sounds to me that you are telling us that Satan is below the little
  squares of ceramic on our bathroom floors, as part of the subflooring?
 
 
  June

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-18 Thread Das GOAT

 -Caveat Lector-

Wow.  At least two people (notably John H. Taylor and Robert Tatman) jumped
in with the correct response, in BALLPARK terms, but NEITHER zeroed in on the
RELEVANT passages in the Old Testament regarding the UGLINESS of the
"Suffering Servant" -- allegedly Jesus Christ, as Biblical "prophecy" sees
it.  And predictably, even the correct passages in Mr Taylor's post, from
http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/j4j-2000/index.html, SKIP OVER the relevant
verses, OBFUSCATING the entire issue beneath a numbing smokescreen of
secondary pious "interpretation" and cross-references.  How typical!

Okay, let's look right at the statements in question, used to argue that the
"Messiah" or "Christ" was or will be UGLY, and was SHUNNED for his ugliness
and/or his "disease."
(Taylor's post is included at the end, so you can watch our AVOIDANCE of the
fact.)


 Isaiah 52:13-15 and 53:2-6 et seq., KING JAMES translation:

52:13  Behold, my servant shall deal prudently, he shall be
exalted and extolled, and be very high.
52:14  As many were astonied at thee; HIS VISAGE WAS SO MARRED
MORE THAN ANY MAN, and HIS FORM [MARRED] MORE THAN THE SONS OF
MEN:
52:15  So shall he sprinkle many nations; THE KINGS SHALL SHUT
THEIR MOUTHS AT HIM: for that which had not been told them shall
they see; and that which they had not heard shall they consider.
...

53:2  For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant and as a
root, out of a dry ground: HE HATH NO FORM NOR COMELINESS; and
WHEN WE SHALL SEE HIM, THERE IS NO BEAUTY that we should DESIRE
him.
53:3  He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and
acquainted with grief: and WE HID AS IT WERE OUR FACES FROM HIM;
he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
53:4  Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our
sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and
afflicted.
53:5  But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was
bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was
upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
53:6  All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every
one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of
us all.



From the HEBREW (Masoretic text), literally translated into English:

52:13  Watch, my servant who shall minister wisely will be lifted
up and held high, greatly -- as (great) as the 'disfigurement'
[MShChTh] of his appearance among (other) men and of his form
among (other) human beings -- to the astonishment of many.
52:14  Thus he 'sprinkles' [=a "purifying" gesture] many (other)
nations -- (Because) on (seeing} him, kings will be speechless,
since they will be witnessing something they had never been told
about and contemplating (something) they had never heard of.
...

53:2  (He was) without stature or attractiveness that might cause
anyone to notice him, and without impressive appearance that
might cause anyone to admire him.
53:3  (He was) despised and rejected by people, a man of woes,
having much experience of pain.  Others averted their eyes
from him in disgust, not seeing anything worthwhile in him.
53:4  (But) even while we regarded {him} as (one whom) God had
punished (as if) with the plague and misforune, (it was) really
OUR pain he held high and OUR woes he carried around.
53:5   He was humiliated by OUR misdeeds, (he was) tormented from
OUR wickedness.  In him (there existed) an offense to our peace
of mind, so by 'whipping' HIM, (we) felt OURSELVES 'restored.'
53:6   (We are) all like sheep gone astray, (every) man having
turned aside his eyes to {pursue} his (own) course -- but through
HIM, YHWH has made us encounter the wickedness in all of US.

_

KJV 53:7  He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened
not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a
sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.
KJV 53:8  He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who
shall declare his generation?  for he was cut off out of the land
of the living: for the transgression of my people was he
stricken.
KJV 53:9  And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the
rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was
any deceit in his mouth.
KJV 53:10  Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him
to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he
shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure
of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.
KJV 53:11  He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be
satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify
many; for he shall bear their iniquities.
KJV 53:12  Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great,
and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath
poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the
transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession
for the transgressors.


Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-18 Thread YnrChyldzWyld

 -Caveat Lector-

On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Eagle 1 wrote:
There is a difference between "sin" and "disobedience".
The two are not equal; nor do they have the same connotations.
Example: God ordered Hosea to marry a whore - Hosea 1:2.  He "obeyed" ...
but technically, he "sinned", because he became party to a "sin" of the
flesh,  which was 'adultry'.

Wrong.  Adultery (try learning how to spell it correctly) according to
the Bible, is sexual relations between a man and a woman who are both
married to someone else.  If only one partner is married, only that
person is committing adultery.  An unmarried person cannot commit
adultery, neither is sexual intercourse between a man and a woman who are
legally married to each other adultery.

Hosea was legally married to the whore, therefore he could not be
committing adultery when he had sexual relations with her.  Neither was
she an adulteress when having sexual relations with Hosea.  And the fact
that she was able to legally marry Hosea suggests that she was not
married to another man, therefore even when she made a living as a whore,
SHE did not commit adultery, even tho a client may have been married.  It
would have been her married clients who were adulterers...


June ;-)

|===SEASONS===GREETINGS==|
| \ /|
|  *~o)   )_ )_ )_  )_   - * -   |
|   |`--) ,  ,_),_),_),_/ / \|
|  ``^^^``   /~\/~\/~\/~\|
||
| / / /   |  |
|   \ /  ((((((  -+- |
|  - * -.-#--..-#-..--#-. |  |
|   /|\/__\  /_\  /__\   /-\ |
|__//|\\| []  [] || [] [] || []  [] |___/---\___ldb__|

artist -SheDragon (Laura) (ldb)

*---*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*---*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
 address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
 $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
 email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
 terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
 unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
 email.
**

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-18 Thread nessie

 -Caveat Lector-

even when she made a living as a whore,

More likely she was a worshiper of Ashera or Astarte or whatever She was
called in the local dialect, and as such practiced ritual prostitution as
part her religion. If so, once a year she turned a single trick. The money
went to charity and temple vestments. If she were particularly religious,
and young, she might do it full time for a while. But it wasn't a trade
that one worked like carpentry of tax collecting, as it is today. It was a
sacrament of a competing religion. That's why Jews preached against it.
That's why they still preach against it, as do the followers of Judiasm's
primary break away sub-sects, Christianity and Islam. Everyone  always
preaches against the sacraments of competing religion. Or they can be
adopted. That happens sometimes, too.

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-18 Thread Eagle 1

 -Caveat Lector-

I vary to differ with you.
IF the woman Hosea married, ever had relations with a married client during
the course of her business, she became an adultress. That title, or "sin",
is never removed, except by the grace or pardon of God.

So, in other words, I disagree.
I will leave it at that.

eagle 1

- Original Message -
From: "YnrChyldzWyld" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 1999 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Eagle 1 wrote:
 There is a difference between "sin" and "disobedience".
 The two are not equal; nor do they have the same connotations.
 Example: God ordered Hosea to marry a whore - Hosea 1:2.  He "obeyed" ...
 but technically, he "sinned", because he became party to a "sin" of the
 flesh,  which was 'adultry'.

 Wrong.  Adultery (try learning how to spell it correctly) according to
 the Bible, is sexual relations between a man and a woman who are both
 married to someone else.  If only one partner is married, only that
 person is committing adultery.  An unmarried person cannot commit
 adultery, neither is sexual intercourse between a man and a woman who are
 legally married to each other adultery.

 Hosea was legally married to the whore, therefore he could not be
 committing adultery when he had sexual relations with her.  Neither was
 she an adulteress when having sexual relations with Hosea.  And the fact
 that she was able to legally marry Hosea suggests that she was not
 married to another man, therefore even when she made a living as a whore,
 SHE did not commit adultery, even tho a client may have been married.  It
 would have been her married clients who were adulterers...


 June

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-18 Thread Eagle 1

 -Caveat Lector-

Well then,  with all that said...
It stands to reason that the Biblical account of Lucifer's beauty should
also be considered.  In Genesis he was called the "Serpent", the most
subtile of all the beasts... (this includes man).  "Serpent" in this
instance, is interpreted from the Hebrew to mean "glistening one; one who
enchants and casts spells; one who hisses and murmers".
Lucifer is said to have been created perfect in beauty;  therefore, the
antichrist, Lucifer, the Devil, the Old Serpent, the Dragon,  "et al",
should be classified as the most beautiful,  and so does the Bible give him
such traits,  unlike common stories that he is ugly, has horns, carries a
pitchfork, while wearing red long-handled underwear.

He's wants to present himself as God,  as is described in the greatest
conspiracy of the Bible and according to "Isaiah 14:12-16", since long ago.
(And he will soon get his opportunity to appear as the Messiah).  Ezekiel
acknowledged that he was of much beauty and wisdom,  according to the letter
to the King of Tyre,  of whom when reading on,  we find that the King of
Tyre is merely a type of antichrist to come,  according to the book of the
same name chapter 28:1-19

In the same passage,  we find that this cherub was not animal or human,  but
rather a creature called a 'cherub'.  The Bible / Hebrew is very
non-descript of this being. It is not directly defined as to what a cherub
actually is, other than a protector of the mercy seat of God, as described
in Exodus regarding the design applications for the ark of the covenant.
However, information can be gathered from the Bible that indicates that this
being is nothing like anything we have ever experienced in our course of
humanity, either living or dead.  Cherubs are called "living creatures" in
the Revelation.  Cherubs,  contrary to popular belief,  are not "angels" or
"messengers",  but rather a non-mobile creature attached to the presence of
God,  that is relatively and totally different than anything we know of,
past or present on the face of the earth, other than Lucifer's temporary
detachment that caused his demise and judgment which is awaiting to be
fulfilled.

Beauty of the physical entity is not the most desired.
It is more the beauty within that is to be desired.

eagle 1

- Original Message -
From: "Das GOAT" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 1999 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 Wow.  At least two people (notably John H. Taylor and Robert Tatman)
jumped
 in with the correct response, in BALLPARK terms, but NEITHER zeroed in on
the
 RELEVANT passages in the Old Testament regarding the UGLINESS of the
 "Suffering Servant" -- allegedly Jesus Christ, as Biblical "prophecy" sees
 it.  And predictably, even the correct passages in Mr Taylor's post, from
 http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/j4j-2000/index.html, SKIP OVER the relevant
 verses, OBFUSCATING the entire issue beneath a numbing smokescreen of
 secondary pious "interpretation" and cross-references.  How typical!

 Okay, let's look right at the statements in question, used to argue that
the
 "Messiah" or "Christ" was or will be UGLY, and was SHUNNED for his
ugliness
 and/or his "disease."
 (Taylor's post is included at the end, so you can watch our AVOIDANCE of
the
 fact.)


  Isaiah 52:13-15 and 53:2-6 et seq., KING JAMES translation:

 52:13  Behold, my servant shall deal prudently, he shall be
 exalted and extolled, and be very high.
 52:14  As many were astonied at thee; HIS VISAGE WAS SO MARRED
 MORE THAN ANY MAN, and HIS FORM [MARRED] MORE THAN THE SONS OF
 MEN:
 52:15  So shall he sprinkle many nations; THE KINGS SHALL SHUT
 THEIR MOUTHS AT HIM: for that which had not been told them shall
 they see; and that which they had not heard shall they consider.
 ...

 53:2  For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant and as a
 root, out of a dry ground: HE HATH NO FORM NOR COMELINESS; and
 WHEN WE SHALL SEE HIM, THERE IS NO BEAUTY that we should DESIRE
 him.
 53:3  He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and
 acquainted with grief: and WE HID AS IT WERE OUR FACES FROM HIM;
 he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
 53:4  Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our
 sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and
 afflicted.
 53:5  But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was
 bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was
 upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
 53:6  All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every
 one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of
 us all.

 

 From the HEBREW (Masoretic text), literally translated into English:

 52:13  Watch, my servant who shall mi

Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-18 Thread Das GOAT

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 99-12-18 13:48:57 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Beauty of the physical entity is not the most desired.
It is more the beauty within that is to be desired.

An appropriate thing to consider in this day of media-manufactured "beautiful
people," when no one is "real" to us unless they've appeared on TV, and
everyone who appears on TV --especially heads of state and social lions-- is
subject to extensive makeovers, wardrobe advice, voice coaches, acting
lessons, and the help of public relations firms.
The death of Princess Di got more airtime on TV and column inches in the
press than Mother Theresa for the simple reason that she was photogenic and
the old nun wasn't.
It's a "miracle" that aging, frail, sometimes drooly Pope John Paul II --who
STILL, or so I've heard, gets made up for the cameras) even gets his face in
the news nowadays ...

What's external to the person --physical appearance and "image"-- might be
the most superficial and least character-based of human attributes, but it's
certainly become the most marketable, just another "product" in a world
running on sales of "commodities."
The true spiritual worth of a person is something that can't be SEEN, but
even worse, because of that fact, it can't be SOLD!  Conversely, what CAN be
seen --what might APPEAR to be "spiritual worth"-- IS "bought and sold" --
and should be questioned ...
So, without even considering the quirky possibility that a Messiah or the
Christ might in fact be "ugly," you're right about the fabled "beauty" of
Lucifer, Satan, the Antichrist, or whoever.-- if the Devil himself ever
wanted to deceive the whole world, all for the profit of EVIL, you can bet
that he'd beat "God" hands-down in today's arena of mass-media ...

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-17 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/16/1999 7:20:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 is said to have "spilled his seed on the ground".  God then kills Onan.
 Personally I think Onan was killed for disobeying God and not for the
 masturbation, or the spilling of the seed. 

I've always wondered at the odd interpretation in this case.  If your God
orders you to do anything, and you failed to do so, I would imagine it was a
sin.  Besides I'm seeing Coitus Interruptus rather than masterbation anyway.
Oh well.  Prudy

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-17 Thread Eagle 1

 -Caveat Lector-

There is a difference between "sin" and "disobedience".
The two are not equal; nor do they have the same connotations.
Example: God ordered Hosea to marry a whore - Hosea 1:2.  He "obeyed" ...
but technically, he "sinned", because he became party to a "sin" of the
flesh,  which was 'adultry'.

With regards to the God of the Bible, 'obedience' is always more preferred
rather than if a thing is a sin.  Sin,  has been superflourized by man with
modernday folklores of religion...

eagle 1

- Original Message -
From: "Prudence L. Kuhn" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 12/16/1999 7:20:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  is said to have "spilled his seed on the ground".  God then kills Onan.
  Personally I think Onan was killed for disobeying God and not for the
  masturbation, or the spilling of the seed. 

 I've always wondered at the odd interpretation in this case.  If your God
 orders you to do anything, and you failed to do so, I would imagine it was
a
 sin.  Besides I'm seeing Coitus Interruptus rather than masterbation
anyway.
 Oh well.  Prudy

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-17 Thread Tatman, Robert

 -Caveat Lector-

Well, Tenebrous, aside from it being his brother's *widow*, your remarks are
right in line with standard mainstream theological thinking today. You're
quite correct that there aren't any other references to anything that could
be construed as masturbation, in either the Old Testament or the New
Testament. Virtually all of the O.T. references to prohibited sex acts occur
in tandem with prohibited *religious* practices, which leads to the logical
conclusion that the sex acts in question actually formed part of the
prohibited "pagan" (i.e., non-Yahwist) practices. Now, lest someone charge
me with being too far off-list, I hasten to submit that this is a perfect
example of editorial censorship in the compilation of the Bible over the
centuries. *All* of the confusion stems from the deletion of explicit
references to the deity or deities whose cult was prohibited. There is some
(admittedly controversial) evidence, which we have discussed before on the
list, that prior to the Exile, the Hebrews were, at least part of the time,
*henotheistic*--that is, they worshipped *several* gods, of whom Yahweh
Sabaoth, "the Lord of Hosts" (i.e., the Generalissimo of Heaven), was primus
inter pares, much like Zeus among the Olympians. (x-ref the thread DasGOAT
and I got going a while back which included the considerable evidence for
cultural and religious interaction between Greece and Palestine-Syria.)
Apparently Yahweh had at least one consort, Asherah, plus possibly Tanit of
the Phoenicians. The Deuteronomic reforms under "Good King Josiah," as
Robert Graves calls him, stripped off the consorts and other "impure"
accretions, then recast the Law of Moses in the scroll that was "found" in
the Temple and brought to Josiah, which became what we know today as
Deuteronomy (that is, "the second law"). It is this new legal recension that
forms the basis of the subsequent social code that lies behind much of our
modern social customs, or rather the "officially-sanctioned" version of
those customs.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 7:21 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

  -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 12/16/99 3:38:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
his tremor
caused him to masturbate, which is a sin. 
 
   I've heard a lot of strange things from Christian beliefs, but this is
 the
   first I've heard of this.  God denies ugly Christians this only form of
   relief?  I don't recall seeing this in the ten commandments.
 
   Regards,
   Bob Stokes

 It is a hotly debated topic.  Most of the people who say that masturbation
 is
 a sin point out one particular passage of scripture to support the view.
 It's in the OT somewhere, where God commands a man named Onan to go into
 his
 brothers wife (or some such) and have sex with her in order to produce an
 heir (at least this is how I remember the story).  Onan fails to do so,
 and
 is said to have "spilled his seed on the ground".  God then kills Onan.
 Personally I think Onan was killed for disobeying God and not for the
 masturbation, or the spilling of the seed.  That is of course predicated
 on
 the notion that any of that stuff has any basis in fact, or that it is a
 canon you hold to.  I am not aware of any other passages of the Bible
 which
 prohibit the activity, though I am quite certain the Roman Church has it
 listed as a sin.



DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-17 Thread TenebrousT

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/17/99 6:48:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

  is said to have "spilled his seed on the ground".  God then kills Onan.
   Personally I think Onan was killed for disobeying God and not for the
   masturbation, or the spilling of the seed. 

  I've always wondered at the odd interpretation in this case.  If your God
  orders you to do anything, and you failed to do so, I would imagine it was
a
  sin.  Besides I'm seeing Coitus Interruptus rather than masterbation
anyway.
  Oh well.  Prudy

I agree, my point was that it was the disobeying which was the sin, not the
"coitus interruptus" (or masturbation if anyone prefers to interpret it that
way).

**
***
"Welcome to the desert of the real."  Morpheus, "The Matrix".

"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human
mind to correlate all its contents.
  We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of seas of infinity,
and it is not meant that we should
  voyage far.  The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have
hitherto harmed us little; but someday
  the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying
vistas of reality, and of our
  frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation
or flee from the deadly light into the
  peace and safety of a new dark age."  H.P.Lovecraft; "The Call of Cthulhu"

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Terry Trainor

 -Caveat Lector-

Hmm.  There's only one Isaiah.  This passage is located in Isaiah 53:3.
Reading the entire chapter (only 12 verses) leaves one with little doubt
that it is Jesus being spoken of here.  Like that 'All we like sheep have
gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid
on him the iniquity of us all' (53:6), and 'He was wounded for our
transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: . . .' (53:5).  With all
respect to modern scholars, I don't see how Israel bore my sins, spent time
in prison, or was punished by God for my failures.

 -Original Message-
 From: Tatman, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 3:34 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


  -Caveat Lector-

 It *is* in Second Isaiah, but I can't remember the exact
 verse. The verse
 forms one of the most striking passages in Handel's
 *Messiah*: "He was a man
 of sorrows and acquainted with grief." It's part of the
 "suffering servant"
 theme, which many modern scholars believe refers not to a
 specific person
 but rather to Eretz Israel, the ever-suffering Land of Israel itself.
 Evangelical theologians, of course, generally consider the "suffering
 servant" passages to apply to Jesus Christ.

  -Original Message-
  From: Das GOAT [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 5:26 AM
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
 
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  In a message dated 99-12-14 13:52:52 EST,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Actually, there is a sort of underground tradition, mostly
 in the later
  New
  Testament apocrypha, that Jesus was in fact an ugly man ...
 
  That tradition seems to have originated with one of the
 seldom-quoted Old
  Testament "prophecies" regarding the coming of the Messiah, therein
  called, I
  believe, the "man of sorrows."  When correctly translated from the
  original
  Hebrew, it describes him as a man totally lacking in physical
  attractveness,
  even ugly, AND as socially rejected for his appearance,
 like a thorn among
  roses or whatever.  (It's been treated as "just a metaphor"
 by Christians
  who
  know of it, but the description in context is a literal
 one, and, apart
  from
  the desire to make the Savior one of the "beautiful
 people," there's no
  other
  reason to doubt it being a simple statement of fact.  To
 sidestep the
  implications of that conclusion, in fact, some Biblicists
 even resort to a
  Talmudic sleight of hand, claiming that "prophecy" refers
 not to the One
  Yet
  to Come but to MOSES long ago.
  My OWN understanding, for what it's worth, is that it
 refers to NEITHER
  and
  is not a "prophecy" at all but describes an historic
 person, a "failed"
  Messiah ca. 400 BC.)
 
  If no one else comes forward first with the passage in
 question, which I
  seem
  to recall is found in Second Isaiah, I'll look it up when I
 have more time
  and post it here myself.
 
 

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list.
 Proselyzting propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are
 sordid matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths,
 misdirections and outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major
 and minor effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That
 being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
 suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to
 Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 ==
 ==
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 ==
 ==
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Tatman, Robert

 -Caveat Lector-

Second Isaiah is the part of Isaiah starting with 40:1, "Comfort, comfort ye
my people, saith your God..." The style is very different from the earlier
chapters, indicating a different author of the same prophetic school. Look
at it from the viewpoint of a Jewish scholar, who obviously isn't interested
in Jesus as Messiah: this part of Isaiah was probably written just before
the Exile, when Israel (the northern part of the Divided Kingdom) had been
absorbed by Babylon and Judea was waiting nervously for the ravening beast
to turn in its direction. There was already a tendency to personify Israel,
which would become much more significant after the return. Read through
Kings and Chronicles--all of the evils visited upon the two kingdoms are
attributed to monarchs who "departed from the ways of his fathers..."; that
is, turned to the old semi-pagan forms of worship instead of worshipping
Yahweh alone. By the same token, anything good is because the king "walked
in the paths of righteousness." The Suffering Servant verses focus on the
evil periods, and (according to this interpretation) portray Israel (the
land, not the kingdom) as bearing the brunt of the people's sins. This is a
quite legitimate interpretation from a Jewish viewpoint; the Christian
assumption that it applies to Jesus is based on Jesus' application of its
metaphors to himself. Indeed, there is some evidence that Jesus deliberately
sought to embody *all* of the many different messianic images found in the
Hebrew Scriptures.

 -Original Message-
 From: Terry Trainor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 7:22 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

  -Caveat Lector-

 Hmm.  There's only one Isaiah.  This passage is located in Isaiah 53:3.
 Reading the entire chapter (only 12 verses) leaves one with little doubt
 that it is Jesus being spoken of here.  Like that 'All we like sheep have
 gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath
 laid
 on him the iniquity of us all' (53:6), and 'He was wounded for our
 transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: . . .' (53:5).  With
 all
 respect to modern scholars, I don't see how Israel bore my sins, spent
 time
 in prison, or was punished by God for my failures.

  -Original Message-
  From: Tatman, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 3:34 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
 
 
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  It *is* in Second Isaiah, but I can't remember the exact
  verse. The verse
  forms one of the most striking passages in Handel's
  *Messiah*: "He was a man
  of sorrows and acquainted with grief." It's part of the
  "suffering servant"
  theme, which many modern scholars believe refers not to a
  specific person
  but rather to Eretz Israel, the ever-suffering Land of Israel itself.
  Evangelical theologians, of course, generally consider the "suffering
  servant" passages to apply to Jesus Christ.
 


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Terry Trainor

 -Caveat Lector-

CTRL is not the proper forum, so I will not go into detail concerning
your several statements here.  Needless to say, I am not of the school
of J, P, Q, or any of that other modern crud.  But your last statement
I simply cannot let pass without comment.

 -Original Message-
 From: Tatman, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 12:01 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


Kerschnip

 Indeed, there is some evidence that
 Jesus deliberately
 sought to embody *all* of the many different messianic images
 found in the
 Hebrew Scriptures.

Like deliberately being born of a virgin?
like deliberately seeking to be nailed to a cross Between two thieves?
Like deliberately seeking to have a sword rammed into his side?
Like deliberately dying?
Like deliberately being resurrected by God the Father?

Gee - some guys will do ANYTHING for fame, huh?

kerschnip

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread earthman

 -Caveat Lector-

You know what I think Paul's defect was. Now I am no scholar so don't be
offended, but I have been reading between the lines of some information
lately, and I think he may have been a homosexual.
He seems to be anti women. He seemed to be very jealous of Mary Magdalene
and his teachings belittled the role of woman.
The thorn in his side may have meant his back side..
From what I have read Paul was a prick..
Now only my opinion so please don't get upset.

Peter

We are about to go on a Journey. All Aboard
http://sites.netscape.net/gsussnzl/poleshift




- Original Message -
From: Das GOAT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 99-12-14 14:08:00 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This is also why historians often disagree about the authenticity of
Paul's
 writings, and often renounce his writings,  because the handwriting
varies
 in more than one copy of the manuscript notations.

 Beg to differ.  No manuscript of any book in the New Testament is --or
ever
 was, in historical times-- in the "author's" own hand.  All were copies of
 copies of copies, ad infinitum, of scribes.  Also, historians dispute the
 authenticity of several of "Paul's" writings not because of any
graphological
 differences but because of rather glaring differences in the criteria used
 for determining authorship -- vocabulary, grammar, mode of exposition, in
 short "style."  Shakespeare did not write or think like Hemingway.

 For my next two cents, I've read all the best scholarly studies of Paul,
and
 the honest conclusion is that no one knows what Paul's "defect" was.
There
 aren't any "outside"  sources in history, even in the Church, that
described
 his appearance.  All we have to work with is the internal evidence Paul
 himself gives in his writings, and those are not specific at all, beyond
 references to some "thorn in his side," physically or behaviorally, which
 tended to disrupt his self-control, leading to results he considered
 "sinful."  The consensus is that, IF it even WAS a PHYSICAL problem, it
may
 have been epilepsy.

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are sordid
matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Tatman, Robert

 -Caveat Lector-

Terry, I didn't say I *believed* that hypothesis...only that someone
suggested it. (As it happens, it was Robert Graves in a novel called *King
Jesus*, which is probably Graves's oddest book. Hugh Schoenfeld's *The
Passover Plot* and its sequels say much the same thing.) However, because it
involves a conspiracy, whether genuine or not, I'd suggest that it actually
*is* a legitimate topic for this list.

Brief personal statement: I'm a Christian. The Jesus of the Gospels speaks
to me. The Apostle Paul speaks to me. When I read the Bible, I don't expect
to find an absolutely correct historical record. The Bible is a *faith
document*...the records of two thousand years of a people's dealings with
God. When I read about Jesus' birth, his Passion, his death and
Resurrection, I don't go looking for validation from the archaeological
record, *because it doesn't matter to me* what the archaeologists think. If
they never find *any* evidence that Jesus actually existed, it *still*
doesn't matter to me, because I know in my heart, in my soul, in my deepest
center, that Jesus Christ is real and that he is the Way, the Truth, and the
Life. I don't need physical proof to know that.

 -Original Message-
 From: Terry Trainor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 1:29 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

  -Caveat Lector-

 CTRL is not the proper forum, so I will not go into detail concerning
 your several statements here.  Needless to say, I am not of the school
 of J, P, Q, or any of that other modern crud.  But your last statement
 I simply cannot let pass without comment.

  -Original Message-
  From: Tatman, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 12:01 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
 

 Kerschnip

  Indeed, there is some evidence that
  Jesus deliberately
  sought to embody *all* of the many different messianic images
  found in the
  Hebrew Scriptures.

 Like deliberately being born of a virgin?
 like deliberately seeking to be nailed to a cross Between two thieves?
 Like deliberately seeking to have a sword rammed into his side?
 Like deliberately dying?
 Like deliberately being resurrected by God the Father?

 Gee - some guys will do ANYTHING for fame, huh?

 kerschnip



DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Terry Trainor

 -Caveat Lector-

Well, as long as we are speculating, I always figured that Paul
was afflicted with severe nervous disorder, which caused an
uncontrollable trembling of his extremities.  This troubled him
so much because whenever he held himself to urinate, his tremor
caused him to masturbate, which is a sin.

No offense from me either - just a thought.

:^)

AmPat

 -Original Message-
 From: earthman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 1:36 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


  -Caveat Lector-

 You know what I think Paul's defect was. Now I am no scholar
 so don't be
 offended, but I have been reading between the lines of some
 information
 lately, and I think he may have been a homosexual.
 He seems to be anti women. He seemed to be very jealous of
 Mary Magdalene
 and his teachings belittled the role of woman.
 The thorn in his side may have meant his back side..
 From what I have read Paul was a prick..
 Now only my opinion so please don't get upset.

 Peter

 We are about to go on a Journey. All Aboard
 http://sites.netscape.net/gsussnzl/poleshift




 - Original Message -
 From: Das GOAT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 11:47 PM
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


  -Caveat Lector-
 
  In a message dated 99-12-14 14:08:00 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  This is also why historians often disagree about the
 authenticity of
 Paul's
  writings, and often renounce his writings,  because the handwriting
 varies
  in more than one copy of the manuscript notations.
 
  Beg to differ.  No manuscript of any book in the New
 Testament is --or
 ever
  was, in historical times-- in the "author's" own hand.  All
 were copies of
  copies of copies, ad infinitum, of scribes.  Also,
 historians dispute the
  authenticity of several of "Paul's" writings not because of any
 graphological
  differences but because of rather glaring differences in
 the criteria used
  for determining authorship -- vocabulary, grammar, mode of
 exposition, in
  short "style."  Shakespeare did not write or think like Hemingway.
 
  For my next two cents, I've read all the best scholarly
 studies of Paul,
 and
  the honest conclusion is that no one knows what Paul's "defect" was.
 There
  aren't any "outside"  sources in history, even in the Church, that
 described
  his appearance.  All we have to work with is the internal
 evidence Paul
  himself gives in his writings, and those are not specific
 at all, beyond
  references to some "thorn in his side," physically or
 behaviorally, which
  tended to disrupt his self-control, leading to results he considered
  "sinful."  The consensus is that, IF it even WAS a PHYSICAL
 problem, it
 may
  have been epilepsy.
 
  DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
  ==
  CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
 propagandic
  screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are sordid
 matters
  and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths,
 misdirections and
 outright
  frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
 effects
  spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That
 being said, CTRL
  gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
 suggests to
 readers;
  be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to
 Holocaust denial and
  nazi's need not apply.
 
  Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 ==
 ==
  Archives Available at:
  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
 
  http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 ==
 ==
  To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
  SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
  SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Om
 

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list.
 Proselyzting propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are
 sordid matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths,
 misdirections and outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major
 and minor effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That
 being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
 suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to
 Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 ==
 ==
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 ==
 ==
 To subscrib

Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Terry Trainor

 -Caveat Lector-

Excellent.  And to your point, I agree.  It was the area of higher
criticism which I declined to enter due to the forum here.

AmPat

 -Original Message-
 From: Tatman, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 1:47 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


  -Caveat Lector-

 Terry, I didn't say I *believed* that hypothesis...only that someone
 suggested it. (As it happens, it was Robert Graves in a novel
 called *King
 Jesus*, which is probably Graves's oddest book. Hugh Schoenfeld's *The
 Passover Plot* and its sequels say much the same thing.)
 However, because it
 involves a conspiracy, whether genuine or not, I'd suggest
 that it actually
 *is* a legitimate topic for this list.

 Brief personal statement: I'm a Christian. The Jesus of the
 Gospels speaks
 to me. The Apostle Paul speaks to me. When I read the Bible,
 I don't expect
 to find an absolutely correct historical record. The Bible is a *faith
 document*...the records of two thousand years of a people's
 dealings with
 God. When I read about Jesus' birth, his Passion, his death and
 Resurrection, I don't go looking for validation from the
 archaeological
 record, *because it doesn't matter to me* what the
 archaeologists think. If
 they never find *any* evidence that Jesus actually existed, it *still*
 doesn't matter to me, because I know in my heart, in my soul,
 in my deepest
 center, that Jesus Christ is real and that he is the Way, the
 Truth, and the
 Life. I don't need physical proof to know that.

  -Original Message-
  From: Terry Trainor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 1:29 PM
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
 
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  CTRL is not the proper forum, so I will not go into detail
 concerning
  your several statements here.  Needless to say, I am not of
 the school
  of J, P, Q, or any of that other modern crud.  But your
 last statement
  I simply cannot let pass without comment.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Tatman, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 12:01 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
  
 
  Kerschnip
 
   Indeed, there is some evidence that
   Jesus deliberately
   sought to embody *all* of the many different messianic images
   found in the
   Hebrew Scriptures.
 
  Like deliberately being born of a virgin?
  like deliberately seeking to be nailed to a cross Between
 two thieves?
  Like deliberately seeking to have a sword rammed into his side?
  Like deliberately dying?
  Like deliberately being resurrected by God the Father?
 
  Gee - some guys will do ANYTHING for fame, huh?
 
  kerschnip
 
 

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list.
 Proselyzting propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are
 sordid matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths,
 misdirections and outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major
 and minor effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That
 being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
 suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to
 Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 ==
 ==
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 ==
 ==
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email

Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Bob Stokes

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 99-12-16 14:51:57 EST, you write:

 his tremor
 caused him to masturbate, which is a sin. 

I've heard a lot of strange things from Christian beliefs, but this is the
first I've heard of this.  God denies ugly Christians this only form of
relief?  I don't recall seeing this in the ten commandments.

Regards,
Bob Stokes

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Terry Trainor

 -Caveat Lector-

First off, I was being facetious.  Second, it's not
a belief of all Christians, nor is it restricted to
Christians.  Something about a guy named Onan, IIRC.
And 'self abuse'.

I was basing the story on my Dad, who had developed a
severe tremor in his later years.  He confided in me once;
"It's not TOO bad, though.  Sometimes I'll start out
intendin' to take a leak, but end up jerkin' off!"

Bless the old man's heart.  He didn't think it was a sin
either, Bob.

 -Original Message-
 From: Bob Stokes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 2:38 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


  -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 99-12-16 14:51:57 EST, you write:

  his tremor
  caused him to masturbate, which is a sin. 

 I've heard a lot of strange things from Christian beliefs,
 but this is the
 first I've heard of this.  God denies ugly Christians this
 only form of
 relief?  I don't recall seeing this in the ten commandments.

 Regards,
 Bob Stokes

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list.
 Proselyzting propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are
 sordid matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths,
 misdirections and outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major
 and minor effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That
 being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
 suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to
 Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 ==
 ==
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 ==
 ==
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Tenorlove

 -Caveat Lector-

--- earthman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -Caveat Lector-

 You know what I think Paul's defect was. Now I am no scholar so don't
 be
 offended, but I have been reading between the lines of some
 information
 lately, and I think he may have been a homosexual.
 He seems to be anti women. He seemed to be very jealous of Mary
 Magdalene
 and his teachings belittled the role of woman.
 The thorn in his side may have meant his back side..
 From what I have read Paul was a prick..
 Now only my opinion so please don't get upset.

 Peter

I've thought the same thing for years--it's so nice to know someone
else feels the same way. Maybe the thorn was hemorrhoids snort
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Tenorlove

 -Caveat Lector-

--- Terry Trainor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -Caveat Lector-

 Well, as long as we are speculating, I always figured that Paul
 was afflicted with severe nervous disorder, which caused an
 uncontrollable trembling of his extremities.  This troubled him
 so much because whenever he held himself to urinate, his tremor
 caused him to masturbate, which is a sin.


I think he did it on purpose--otherwise, he would have sat down to
urinate.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread Tenorlove

 -Caveat Lector-

Onan's sin was not masturbation; it was coitus interruptus, refusing to
"bring up seed unto his dead brother for an inheritance" by
impregnating his brother's widow, as required by Jewish law in OT
times.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread earthman

 -Caveat Lector-

Well I must say I have enjoyed the replies to my irreverent comments.. LMAO

Peter

We are about to go on a Journey. All Aboard
http://sites.netscape.net/gsussnzl/poleshift




- Original Message -
From: Tenorlove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 --- earthman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  You know what I think Paul's defect was. Now I am no scholar so don't
  be
  offended, but I have been reading between the lines of some
  information
  lately, and I think he may have been a homosexual.
  He seems to be anti women. He seemed to be very jealous of Mary
  Magdalene
  and his teachings belittled the role of woman.
  The thorn in his side may have meant his back side..
  From what I have read Paul was a prick..
  Now only my opinion so please don't get upset.
 
  Peter

 I've thought the same thing for years--it's so nice to know someone
 else feels the same way. Maybe the thorn was hemorrhoids snort
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
 Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are sordid
matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-16 Thread TenebrousT

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/16/99 3:38:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


   his tremor
   caused him to masturbate, which is a sin. 

  I've heard a lot of strange things from Christian beliefs, but this is the
  first I've heard of this.  God denies ugly Christians this only form of
  relief?  I don't recall seeing this in the ten commandments.

  Regards,
  Bob Stokes

It is a hotly debated topic.  Most of the people who say that masturbation is
a sin point out one particular passage of scripture to support the view.
It's in the OT somewhere, where God commands a man named Onan to go into his
brothers wife (or some such) and have sex with her in order to produce an
heir (at least this is how I remember the story).  Onan fails to do so, and
is said to have "spilled his seed on the ground".  God then kills Onan.
Personally I think Onan was killed for disobeying God and not for the
masturbation, or the spilling of the seed.  That is of course predicated on
the notion that any of that stuff has any basis in fact, or that it is a
canon you hold to.  I am not aware of any other passages of the Bible which
prohibit the activity, though I am quite certain the Roman Church has it
listed as a sin.

**
***
"Welcome to the desert of the real."  Morpheus, "The Matrix".

"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human
mind to correlate all its contents.
  We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of seas of infinity,
and it is not meant that we should
  voyage far.  The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have
hitherto harmed us little; but someday
  the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying
vistas of reality, and of our
  frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation
or flee from the deadly light into the
  peace and safety of a new dark age."  H.P.Lovecraft; "The Call of Cthulhu"

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-15 Thread Das GOAT

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 99-12-14 13:52:52 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Actually, there is a sort of underground tradition, mostly in the later New
Testament apocrypha, that Jesus was in fact an ugly man ...

That tradition seems to have originated with one of the seldom-quoted Old
Testament "prophecies" regarding the coming of the Messiah, therein called, I
believe, the "man of sorrows."  When correctly translated from the original
Hebrew, it describes him as a man totally lacking in physical attractveness,
even ugly, AND as socially rejected for his appearance, like a thorn among
roses or whatever.  (It's been treated as "just a metaphor" by Christians who
know of it, but the description in context is a literal one, and, apart from
the desire to make the Savior one of the "beautiful people," there's no other
reason to doubt it being a simple statement of fact.  To sidestep the
implications of that conclusion, in fact, some Biblicists even resort to a
Talmudic sleight of hand, claiming that "prophecy" refers not to the One Yet
to Come but to MOSES long ago.
My OWN understanding, for what it's worth, is that it refers to NEITHER and
is not a "prophecy" at all but describes an historic person, a "failed"
Messiah ca. 400 BC.)

If no one else comes forward first with the passage in question, which I seem
to recall is found in Second Isaiah, I'll look it up when I have more time
and post it here myself.

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-15 Thread Das GOAT

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 99-12-14 14:08:00 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

This is also why historians often disagree about the authenticity of Paul's
writings, and often renounce his writings,  because the handwriting varies
in more than one copy of the manuscript notations.

Beg to differ.  No manuscript of any book in the New Testament is --or ever
was, in historical times-- in the "author's" own hand.  All were copies of
copies of copies, ad infinitum, of scribes.  Also, historians dispute the
authenticity of several of "Paul's" writings not because of any graphological
differences but because of rather glaring differences in the criteria used
for determining authorship -- vocabulary, grammar, mode of exposition, in
short "style."  Shakespeare did not write or think like Hemingway.

For my next two cents, I've read all the best scholarly studies of Paul, and
the honest conclusion is that no one knows what Paul's "defect" was.  There
aren't any "outside"  sources in history, even in the Church, that described
his appearance.  All we have to work with is the internal evidence Paul
himself gives in his writings, and those are not specific at all, beyond
references to some "thorn in his side," physically or behaviorally, which
tended to disrupt his self-control, leading to results he considered
"sinful."  The consensus is that, IF it even WAS a PHYSICAL problem, it may
have been epilepsy.

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-15 Thread Das GOAT

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 99-12-14 15:13:01 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Let me ask you this ... if there are not manuscripts and or written notes
and or notations,  who did the King James Committee copy their works from?
It is my understanding that there are five copies of the Septuagint in
various hands over the world.  I've seen one copy with my own eyes about 20
years ago.  These seem to reflect what is written,  to the "T",  in what is
commonly called the King James Bible.

 The KJV translators did not rely on the Septuagint, which is a
frequently iffy Greek translation of ONLY the Old Testament, often
disagreeing with the Hebrew original.
(And I just happen to have on my shelves the full text of the Septuagint in
the original, and a word-for-word literal translation into English, plus a
concordance for its Greek.)
The Septuagint as it has come down to us includes numerous textual
interpolations --made apparently by early Greek-speaking Christians-- and
deliberate MIS-translations of the Hebrew found without exception in OLDER
texts of the Old Testament.

 The KJV committee used the "Textus Receptus," a combination of the five
most authoritative MSS. of the NEW Testament [in existence up to the 16th
Century, that is -- more were found LATER in history] in Greek, compiled by
Dutch churchman Erasmus a century before, and the canonic ("Masoretic") text
of the OLD Testament in HEBREW.
 Along with more than a little guidance in noting how St Jerome far
earlier translated both of those languages into Latin  ...

 Read (especially the closing sections) what the KJV translators
THEMSELVES explained in their OWN Preface:
http://www4.autoelect.com/BKJ/preface.htm

 And for a look at the occasionally "unholy," crudely POLITICAL "hidden
agenda" of the overseers of King James' translation, and of some of the chief
translators, see:
 http://www.dtl.org/versions/article/king-james.htm

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-15 Thread YnrChyldzWyld

 -Caveat Lector-

On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Eagle 1 wrote:
As far as Jesus with dark complexion?  Who really knows? His body was never
found.  And really, what does it matter what color his skin was?  However,
if we follow the heritage,  his skin was most likely what we know today as
European caucasian.

Granted that His skin color doesn't matter, but there is no logical
reason to assume He looked like a European caucasian, since He came from
a Middle Eastern semitic peopleso it would be more likely that He had
dark hair, dark eyes, and a fairly 'swarthy' skin (which I personally
find attractive)


Jesus' claimed ancestry is directly from Adam,

With a couple of thousand years interveningso it is foolish to expect
Jesus to look exactly like Adam...just as it is foolish to put a modern
European Caucasoid interpretation of 'ruddy complected'...

What would 'ruddy complected' have meant to a Middle Eastern semitic
people, who for the most part were of a fairly swarthy complexion?


nothing more. If you follow the Biblical historical record,  his mother was
Jewish and of the Levites. Chances are most likely he was fair complected.

There is no logic to this statement.  There is no reason for the Levites
of the period living in Judea to have been of any lighter complexion than
their fellow Hebrewsand tomb paintings and mosaics found in
archeological digs of Jewish temples of the period shows that they
presented themselves as looking no different than modern day
Palestinians


Those who are considered "Arabic" or dark complected,  are technically from
the premature liason of Abraham with the bond woman, which produced and
whose descendants are of Ishmael,  not the sons (descendants) of Isaac.

And why are we to presume that neither Abraham nor Sarah were typically
swarthy as other semitic people are?


Historically, it can all be proven by Biblical history,  for those who are
willing to do the research,  and not listen to what some man says about it.

Even taking the Bible as unerring history, does not justify the
presumption that Abraham, Sarah, Mary or Jesus were of a lighter
complexion than their fellow semites...


June ;-)

|===SEASONS===GREETINGS==|
| \ /|
|  *~o)   )_ )_ )_  )_   - * -   |
|   |`--) ,  ,_),_),_),_/ / \|
|  ``^^^``   /~\/~\/~\/~\|
||
| / / /   |  |
|   \ /  ((((((  -+- |
|  - * -.-#--..-#-..--#-. |  |
|   /|\/__\  /_\  /__\   /-\ |
|__//|\\| []  [] || [] [] || []  [] |___/---\___ldb__|

artist -SheDragon (Laura) (ldb)

*---*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*---*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
 address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
 $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
 email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
 terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
 unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
 email.
**

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-15 Thread Taylor, John (JH)
the face of gentile oppression
(44:17- 18) and describes Israel as "sheep to be slaughtered" in the midst
of the unfaithful gentile nations (44:22,11).

Regarding the claim that Jesus "did not open his mouth" when faced with
oppression and affliction, see Matt. 27:46, Jn. 18:23, 36-37.

53:8 "From dominion and judgement he was taken away." Note the correct
translation of the Hebrew. The Christians are forced to mistranslate, since
- by Jesus' own testimony - he never had any rights to rulership or
judgement, at least not on the "first coming." See, e.g., Jn. 3:17; Jn.
8:15; Jn. 12:47; Jn. 18:36.

53:8 "He was cut off out of the land of the living."

53:9 "His grave was assigned with wicked men." See Ez. 37:11-14, wherein
Israelis described as "cut off" and G-D promises to open its "graves" and
bring Israel back into its own land. Other examples of figurative deaths
include Ex. 10:17; 2 Sam. 9:8; 2 Sam. 16:9.

53:8 "From my peoples' sins, there was injury to them." Here the Prophet
makes absolutely clear, to anyone familiar with Biblical Hebrew, that the
oppressed Servant is a collective Servant, not a single individual. The
Hebrew word "lamoh", when used in our Scriptures, always means "to them"
never "to him" and may be found, for example, in Psalm 99:7 - "They kept his
testimonies, and the statute that He gave to them."

53:9 "And with the rich in his deaths." Perhaps King James should have
changed the original Hebrew, which again makes clear that we are dealing
with a collective Servant, i.e., Israel, which will "come to life" when the
exile ends (Ez. 37:14).

53:9 "He had done no violence." See Matt. 21:12; Mk. 11:15-16; Lk. 19:45;
Lk. 19:27; Matt. 10:34 and Lk. 12:51; then judge for yourself whether this
passage is truly consistent with the New Testament account of Jesus.

53:10 "He shall see his seed." The Hebrew word for "seed", used in this
verse, always refers to physical descendants in our Jewish Scriptures. See,
e.g., Gen. 12:7; Gen. 15:13; Gen. 46:6; Ex. 28:43. A different word,
generally translated as "sons", is used to refer to spiritual descendants
(see Deut. 14:1, e.g.).

53:10 "He will prolong his days." Not only did Jesus die young, but how
could the days be prolonged of someone who is alleged to be G-D?

53:11 "With his knowledge the righteous one, my Servant, will cause many to
be just." Note again the correct translation: the Servant will cause many to
be just, he will not "justify the many." The Jewish mission is to serve as a
"light to the nations" which will ultimately lead the world to a knowledge
of the one true G-D, this both by example (Deut. 4:5-8; Zech. 8:23) and by
instructing the nations in G-D's Law (Isa. 2:3-4; Micah 4:2-3).

53:12 "Therefore, I will divide a portion to him with the great, and he
shall divide the spoil with the mighty." If Jesus is G-D, does the idea of
reward have any meaning? Is it not rather the Jewish people - who
righteously bore the sins of the world and yet remained faithful to G-D (Ps.
44) - who will be rewarded, and this in the manner described more fully in
Isaiah chapters 52 and 54?







-Original Message-
From: Das GOAT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 December 1999 12:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

In

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-15 Thread Tatman, Robert

 -Caveat Lector-

It *is* in Second Isaiah, but I can't remember the exact verse. The verse
forms one of the most striking passages in Handel's *Messiah*: "He was a man
of sorrows and acquainted with grief." It's part of the "suffering servant"
theme, which many modern scholars believe refers not to a specific person
but rather to Eretz Israel, the ever-suffering Land of Israel itself.
Evangelical theologians, of course, generally consider the "suffering
servant" passages to apply to Jesus Christ.

 -Original Message-
 From: Das GOAT [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 5:26 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

  -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 99-12-14 13:52:52 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Actually, there is a sort of underground tradition, mostly in the later
 New
 Testament apocrypha, that Jesus was in fact an ugly man ...

 That tradition seems to have originated with one of the seldom-quoted Old
 Testament "prophecies" regarding the coming of the Messiah, therein
 called, I
 believe, the "man of sorrows."  When correctly translated from the
 original
 Hebrew, it describes him as a man totally lacking in physical
 attractveness,
 even ugly, AND as socially rejected for his appearance, like a thorn among
 roses or whatever.  (It's been treated as "just a metaphor" by Christians
 who
 know of it, but the description in context is a literal one, and, apart
 from
 the desire to make the Savior one of the "beautiful people," there's no
 other
 reason to doubt it being a simple statement of fact.  To sidestep the
 implications of that conclusion, in fact, some Biblicists even resort to a
 Talmudic sleight of hand, claiming that "prophecy" refers not to the One
 Yet
 to Come but to MOSES long ago.
 My OWN understanding, for what it's worth, is that it refers to NEITHER
 and
 is not a "prophecy" at all but describes an historic person, a "failed"
 Messiah ca. 400 BC.)

 If no one else comes forward first with the passage in question, which I
 seem
 to recall is found in Second Isaiah, I'll look it up when I have more time
 and post it here myself.



DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Das GOAT

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 99-12-13 18:03:51 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The TRUTH is that Jesus probably looked like Woody Allen without glasses.
Or perhaps, Gene Wilder. Or, if Christians are really lucky, Bernard Schwartz
a.k.a. Tony Curtis.

Personally, I like the unprepossessing face imprinted on the Shroud of Turin.

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread YnrChyldzWyld

 -Caveat Lector-

The TRUTH is that Jesus probably looked like Woody Allen without
glasses.  Or perhaps, Gene Wilder. Or, if Christians are really lucky,
Bernard Schwartz a.k.a. Tony Curtis.

The TRUTH is that Jesus would probably NOT have looked like the men you
mentioned, who are of European ancestry (albeit Judaic), rather Jesus
probably looked just like any other modern Palestinian...which means he
was NOT blond-haired and blue-eyed, but of a somewhat dark complexion...

More of a chance of him looking like Arafat than Allen...


June ;-)

|===SEASONS===GREETINGS==|
| \ /|
|  *~o)   )_ )_ )_  )_   - * -   |
|   |`--) ,  ,_),_),_),_/ / \|
|  ``^^^``   /~\/~\/~\/~\|
||
| / / /   |  |
|   \ /  ((((((  -+- |
|  - * -.-#--..-#-..--#-. |  |
|   /|\/__\  /_\  /__\   /-\ |
|__//|\\| []  [] || [] [] || []  [] |___/---\___ldb__|

artist -SheDragon (Laura) (ldb)

*---*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*---*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
 address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
 $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
 email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
 terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
 unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
 email.
**

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Terry Trainor

 -Caveat Lector-

I would agree with the dark complexion; probably look like
someone that would not be allowed to sit at the front of
the bus in the 60's.

As soon as some idiot clones from blood stains on the shroud, I guess
we'll know for sure, huh?

:^)

AmPat

 -Original Message-
 From: YnrChyldzWyld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 7:01 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


  -Caveat Lector-

 The TRUTH is that Jesus probably looked like Woody Allen without
 glasses.  Or perhaps, Gene Wilder. Or, if Christians are
 really lucky,
 Bernard Schwartz a.k.a. Tony Curtis.

 The TRUTH is that Jesus would probably NOT have looked like
 the men you
 mentioned, who are of European ancestry (albeit Judaic), rather Jesus
 probably looked just like any other modern
 Palestinian...which means he
 was NOT blond-haired and blue-eyed, but of a somewhat dark
 complexion...

 More of a chance of him looking like Arafat than Allen...


 June ;-)

 |===SEASONS===GREETINGS==|
 | \ /|
 |  *~o)   )_ )_ )_  )_   - * -   |
 |   |`--) ,  ,_),_),_),_/ / \|
 |  ``^^^``   /~\/~\/~\/~\|
 ||
 | / / /   |  |
 |   \ /  ((((((  -+- |
 |  - * -.-#--..-#-..--#-. |  |
 |   /|\/__\  /_\  /__\   /-\ |
 |__//|\\| []  [] || [] [] || []  [] |___/---\___ldb__|

 artist -SheDragon (Laura) (ldb)

 *-
 --*
 revcoal AT connix DOT com
 *-
 --*
  It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
  address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
  $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such
 unsolicited commercial
  email.  Sending such email to this address denotes
 acceptance of these
  terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent
 to receive
  unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
  email.
 *=
 ===*

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list.
 Proselyzting propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are
 sordid matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths,
 misdirections and outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major
 and minor effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That
 being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
 suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to
 Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 ==
 ==
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 ==
 ==
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Tenorlove

 -Caveat Lector-

--- YnrChyldzWyld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 More of a chance of him looking like Arafat than Allen...


If that's the case, Jesus would truly have my pity, 'cause Arafat is
ONE PLUG UGLY DUDE!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Eagle 1

 -Caveat Lector-

Hello Terry,
They've already tried to clone the stains on the shroud.  So far, no luck.
But,  then again,  there are prominent groups who have significant proof
that the shroud is bogus.  WHO really knows?  Carbon dating isn't always so
reliable.
You can see an article about the shroud though,  at http://www.shroud.com/

As far as Jesus with dark complexion?  Who really knows? His body was never
found.  And really, what does it matter what color his skin was?  However,
if we follow the heritage,  his skin was most likely what we know today as
European caucasian. Tracing the skin color isn't that difficult. Jesus'
claimed ancestry is directly from Adam,  which the word Adam in Hebrew means
"ruddy complected" or "able to show blood in the face".  It tells us really
nothing more. If you follow the Biblical historical record,  his mother was
Jewish and of the Levites. Chances are most likely he was fair complected.
Regardless.

Those who are considered "Arabic" or dark complected,  are technically from
the premature liason of Abraham with the bond woman, which produced and
whose descendants are of Ishmael,  not the sons (descendants) of Isaac.

Historically, it can all be proven by Biblical history,  for those who are
willing to do the research,  and not listen to what some man says about it.

eagle 1

http://www.lambsheart.com

- Original Message -
From: "Terry Trainor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 I would agree with the dark complexion; probably look like
 someone that would not be allowed to sit at the front of
 the bus in the 60's.

 As soon as some idiot clones from blood stains on the shroud, I guess
 we'll know for sure, huh?

 :^)

 AmPat

  -Original Message-
  From: YnrChyldzWyld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 7:01 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
 
 
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  The TRUTH is that Jesus probably looked like Woody Allen without
  glasses.  Or perhaps, Gene Wilder. Or, if Christians are
  really lucky,
  Bernard Schwartz a.k.a. Tony Curtis.
 
  The TRUTH is that Jesus would probably NOT have looked like
  the men you
  mentioned, who are of European ancestry (albeit Judaic), rather Jesus
  probably looked just like any other modern
  Palestinian...which means he
  was NOT blond-haired and blue-eyed, but of a somewhat dark
  complexion...
 
  More of a chance of him looking like Arafat than Allen...
 
 
  June ;-)

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Tatman, Robert

 -Caveat Lector-

Actually, there is a sort of underground tradition, mostly in the later New
Testament apocrypha, that Jesus was in fact an ugly man with one twisted
leg. Paul is also reported to have been a cripple, possibly bow-legged from
rickets; note that while *Paulos* has no specific meaning in Greek, one
meaning of its Latin homonym *paulus* is "lame".

 -Original Message-
 From: Tenorlove [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 10:58 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

  -Caveat Lector-

 --- YnrChyldzWyld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  More of a chance of him looking like Arafat than Allen...
 

 If that's the case, Jesus would truly have my pity, 'cause Arafat is
 ONE PLUG UGLY DUDE!


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Eagle 1

 -Caveat Lector-

Hello Robert,
I've been quoted almost the exact thing you wrote...  about Jesus  Paul,
from my estranged dad who is a Mason,  first and above all other things.
(The fact that he believes this from Masonic folklore, to me,  says enough).

I happen to disagree with that opinion, both about Jesus and Paul, and leave
it on that step.  I would rather follow the Biblically historical facts that
show an entirely different point of view.  In historical records,  it is
noted that Paul was not lame but rather nearly, if not completely, blind.
This is why he had others write for him so often, such as Luke and Timothy.
This is also why historians often disagree about the authenticity of Paul's
writings, and often renounce his writings,  because the handwriting varies
in more than one copy of the manuscript notations.

eagle 1


- Original Message -
From: "Tatman, Robert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 Actually, there is a sort of underground tradition, mostly in the later
New
 Testament apocrypha, that Jesus was in fact an ugly man with one twisted
 leg. Paul is also reported to have been a cripple, possibly bow-legged
from
 rickets; note that while *Paulos* has no specific meaning in Greek, one
 meaning of its Latin homonym *paulus* is "lame".

  -Original Message-
  From: Tenorlove [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 10:58 AM
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:  Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
 
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  --- YnrChyldzWyld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
   More of a chance of him looking like Arafat than Allen...
  
 
  If that's the case, Jesus would truly have my pity, 'cause Arafat is
  ONE PLUG UGLY DUDE!
 

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid
matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Kris Millegan

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/14/99 11:08:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

This is why he had others write for him so often, such as Luke and Timothy.
This is also why historians often disagree about the authenticity of Paul's
writings, and often renounce his writings,  because the handwriting varies
in more than one copy of the manuscript notations.

 There are  the actual manuscripts of Pauline letters available?

Om
k

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Eagle 1

 -Caveat Lector-

Let me ask you this Kris,  if there are not manuscripts and or written notes
and or notations,  who did the King James Committee copy their works from?
It is my understanding that there are five copies of the Septuagint in
various hands over the world.  I've seen one copy with my own eyes about 20
years ago.  These seem to reflect what is written,  to the "T",  in what is
commonly called the King James Bible.  Where other translators got their
translations or transliterations,  I cannot say.

However,  I do not believe that this work we have come to call the Bible is
merely a collection of simple hand-me-down hagadah's,  but rather it is a
documentable and historical reference regarding the tribes of the Hebrews
and their migrations from Adam and Eve until we end with John's writings of
the Messiah's Revealings - the Revelation.  The original recordings are
mostly obtainable,  or at least viewable. If you want a more exact resource,
give me a couple of weeks,  since I have to work through and including New
Year's Day,  and I'll give you a documentable resource of where you can go
to view, or where you can obtain a copy of these same documents I viewed.

I believe that they are available.  I do not believe,  however, that they
are all in manuscript / coptic form,  as you may think of the "Dead Sea
Scrolls".

eagle 1

- Original Message -
From: "Kris Millegan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 12/14/99 11:08:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This is why he had others write for him so often, such as Luke and
Timothy.
 This is also why historians often disagree about the authenticity of
Paul's
 writings, and often renounce his writings,  because the handwriting
varies
 in more than one copy of the manuscript notations.

  There are  the actual manuscripts of Pauline letters available?

 Om
 k

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Terry Trainor

 -Caveat Lector-

Lighten up, Eagle -

I'm quite sure that this was a joking reference to your use of the
term 'handwriting';  I know that no one here thinks we have an ORIGINAL
manuscript, one that Paul himself penned - - -

AmPat

 -Original Message-
 From: Eagle 1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 2:14 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


  -Caveat Lector-

 Let me ask you this Kris,  if there are not manuscripts and
 or written notes
 and or notations,  who did the King James Committee copy
 their works from?
 It is my understanding that there are five copies of the Septuagint in
 various hands over the world.  I've seen one copy with my own
 eyes about 20
 years ago.  These seem to reflect what is written,  to the
 "T",  in what is
 commonly called the King James Bible.  Where other
 translators got their
 translations or transliterations,  I cannot say.

 However,  I do not believe that this work we have come to
 call the Bible is
 merely a collection of simple hand-me-down hagadah's,  but
 rather it is a
 documentable and historical reference regarding the tribes of
 the Hebrews
 and their migrations from Adam and Eve until we end with
 John's writings of
 the Messiah's Revealings - the Revelation.  The original
 recordings are
 mostly obtainable,  or at least viewable. If you want a more
 exact resource,
 give me a couple of weeks,  since I have to work through and
 including New
 Year's Day,  and I'll give you a documentable resource of
 where you can go
 to view, or where you can obtain a copy of these same
 documents I viewed.

 I believe that they are available.  I do not believe,
 however, that they
 are all in manuscript / coptic form,  as you may think of the
 "Dead Sea
 Scrolls".

 eagle 1

 - Original Message -
 From: "Kris Millegan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 1:57 PM
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


  -Caveat Lector-
 
  In a message dated 12/14/99 11:08:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  This is why he had others write for him so often, such as Luke and
 Timothy.
  This is also why historians often disagree about the
 authenticity of
 Paul's
  writings, and often renounce his writings,  because the handwriting
 varies
  in more than one copy of the manuscript notations.
 
   There are  the actual manuscripts of Pauline letters available?
 
  Om
  k

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list.
 Proselyzting propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are
 sordid matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths,
 misdirections and outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major
 and minor effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That
 being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
 suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to
 Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 ==
 ==
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 ==
 ==
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-14 Thread Tenorlove

 -Caveat Lector-

--- Eagle 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -Caveat Lector-

 Let me ask you this Kris,  if there are not manuscripts and or
 written notes
 and or notations,  who did the King James Committee copy their works
 from?
 It is my understanding that there are five copies of the Septuagint
 in
 various hands over the world.

The Septuagint is only the Old Testament. No New Testament MSS exist
that date prior to the reign of Diocletian, who ordered all Christian
documents destroyed. Constantine, after his conversion to
Christianity/Sol Invictus monotheism, commissioned new documents.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-13 Thread C Davis

 -Caveat Lector-

Some one sent a web site the other day that had the image of Diana as
Madonna. Could whoever did that please do it again?
Thanks

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-13 Thread Nurev Ind Research

 -Caveat Lector-

Das GOAT wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 Updated Jesus Image Has Dark Skin

 By DAVID CRARY
 .c The Associated Press

 NEW YORK (AP) - A painting of a dark-skinned Jesus, by an artist who used a
 woman as a model, has been selected by a Catholic publication as the winner
 of its contest to update the image of Christ for the new millennium.

 The painting, ``Jesus of the People,'' was selected from nearly 1,700 entries
 for the cover of a special millennium issue being published this week by the
 National Catholic Reporter, an independent newsweekly and one of the
 best-known Catholic publications in the country.

 ``My goal was to be as inclusive as possible,'' said the artist, Janet
 McKenzie, from her studio in Island Pond, Vt. ``At first glance, he is a
 black or African-American Jesus, but looking more deeply you see many people
 in it.''

 The painting shows a robed and haloed Jesus. Against a pale pink background
 are a yin-yang symbol, intended to represent perfect balance, and a feather,
 symbolizing the American Indian spirituality that McKenzie learned about
 during a stay in New Mexico.

 The painting ``is a haunting image of a peasant Jesus - dark, thick-lipped,
 looking out on us with ineffable dignity, with sadness but with confidence,''
 wrote Sister Wendy Beckett, the 69-year-old British nun and host of a public
 television series about art. She selected the winner and three runners-up.

 In the view of one of the judges, Sherry Lynn Best, who directs an art
 gallery at Rockhurst University: ``It's not real masculine. It's not real
 feminine. It's not really androgynous, either.''

 Contestants in 19 countries, ranging from children to prominent graphic
 designers, submitted entries that a three-member jury winnowed to 10
 finalists.

 The contest was conceived by the National Catholic Reporter's editor, Michael
 Farrell, who had hoped it would produce a provocative winner.

 ``If everybody looks at it and says, `Very nice,' that means it will have
 failed,'' he said. ``Every new work of art that has been worth anything has
 been controversial when it first appeared.''

 McKenzie, who wins a $2,000 first prize, describes herself as a ``devout
 agnostic'' with an interest in many faiths. She has devoted much of her work
 to images of strong, spiritual women.

 Her Jesus, she said, was intended to be a masculine presence, but she sought
 to add subtly a feminine dimension by using a woman as a model.

 ``This painting is about love,'' she said. ``It's about reminding all of us
 about the importance of celebrating our differences.''

 The judges who reviewed the entries said they were struck by the variety:
 abstract designs, computer graphics, Jesus as a homeless person, Jesus in
 outer space cradling the Earth, a Jesus with superhero biceps.

 ``I think Jesus would have liked this contest,'' said one of the judges,
 Pattie Wigand Sporrong of Catholic Theological Union in Chicago. ``It didn't
 have a lot of boundaries and barriers.''

 McKenzie, 51, is a Brooklyn native who moved to Vermont in 1976. Her base is
 Island Pond, a small town in the sparsely populated northeastern corner of
 the state where she sometimes paints 12 hours at a stretch in the wing of a
 135-year-old house.

 ```Jesus of the People' simply came through me,'' McKenzie said. ``I feel as
 though I am only a vehicle for its existence.''

 The 50,000-circulation National Catholic Reporter, based in Kansas City, Mo.,
 and founded in 1964, has taken pride in its independence, its support for
 ecumenical reforms and its willingness to provoke debate.

 Farrell, in a column in the new issue, predicted the choice of ``Jesus of the
 People'' would carry on that tradition.

 ``We got a strong impression that the era of the blond, blue-eyed Jesus is
 over,'' he wrote. ``When the church was overwhelmingly a Western institution,
 we made Jesus in our likeness. ... This work of art may be prophetic of where
 and how Christianity will flourish in the next millennium or two.''

Ahh ha ha ha ha ha haha ha ha .

Next decade, when the Koreans and other Asians trade in their heritage for
Western superstitions, Jesus will have slanted eyes and a yellowish tinge.

The TRUTH is that Jesus probably looked like Woody Allen without glasses.
Or perhaps, Gene Wilder. Or, if Christians are really lucky, Bernard Schwartz
a.k.a. Tony Curtis.

Joshua2

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need 

Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-13 Thread Tenorlove

 -Caveat Lector-

According to a routine by comedy group Travesty Limited, from the late
70s:

excerpt begins
God (to Jesus, before sending him to earth): Whenever they paint your
picture, you're gonna look like a gay Norwegian.

Jesus: What'll I really look like?

God: Frank Zappa!

Jesus: What's my name gonna be?

God: Jesus.

Jesus: I'll be Puerto Rican?

God: No, Jewish.

Jesus (after screaming): Ok, as long as I don't have to go to the
Middle East...

excerpt ends

Chances are better than average that he had dark hair and eyes. I have
other ideas about this, but don't know how to express them without
revealing some personal information that I'm not comfortable discussing
on the Internet.

Tenorlove
confused
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus

1999-12-13 Thread earthman

 -Caveat Lector-

I heard he had red hair and green eyes..

Peter

We are about to go on a Journey. All Aboard
http://sites.netscape.net/gsussnzl/poleshift




- Original Message -
From: Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus


 -Caveat Lector-

 Das GOAT wrote:
 
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  Updated Jesus Image Has Dark Skin
 
  By DAVID CRARY
  .c The Associated Press
 
  NEW YORK (AP) - A painting of a dark-skinned Jesus, by an artist who
used a
  woman as a model, has been selected by a Catholic publication as the
winner
  of its contest to update the image of Christ for the new millennium.
 
  The painting, ``Jesus of the People,'' was selected from nearly 1,700
entries
  for the cover of a special millennium issue being published this week by
the
  National Catholic Reporter, an independent newsweekly and one of the
  best-known Catholic publications in the country.
 
  ``My goal was to be as inclusive as possible,'' said the artist, Janet
  McKenzie, from her studio in Island Pond, Vt. ``At first glance, he is a
  black or African-American Jesus, but looking more deeply you see many
people
  in it.''
 
  The painting shows a robed and haloed Jesus. Against a pale pink
background
  are a yin-yang symbol, intended to represent perfect balance, and a
feather,
  symbolizing the American Indian spirituality that McKenzie learned about
  during a stay in New Mexico.
 
  The painting ``is a haunting image of a peasant Jesus - dark,
thick-lipped,
  looking out on us with ineffable dignity, with sadness but with
confidence,''
  wrote Sister Wendy Beckett, the 69-year-old British nun and host of a
public
  television series about art. She selected the winner and three
runners-up.
 
  In the view of one of the judges, Sherry Lynn Best, who directs an art
  gallery at Rockhurst University: ``It's not real masculine. It's not
real
  feminine. It's not really androgynous, either.''
 
  Contestants in 19 countries, ranging from children to prominent graphic
  designers, submitted entries that a three-member jury winnowed to 10
  finalists.
 
  The contest was conceived by the National Catholic Reporter's editor,
Michael
  Farrell, who had hoped it would produce a provocative winner.
 
  ``If everybody looks at it and says, `Very nice,' that means it will
have
  failed,'' he said. ``Every new work of art that has been worth anything
has
  been controversial when it first appeared.''
 
  McKenzie, who wins a $2,000 first prize, describes herself as a ``devout
  agnostic'' with an interest in many faiths. She has devoted much of her
work
  to images of strong, spiritual women.
 
  Her Jesus, she said, was intended to be a masculine presence, but she
sought
  to add subtly a feminine dimension by using a woman as a model.
 
  ``This painting is about love,'' she said. ``It's about reminding all of
us
  about the importance of celebrating our differences.''
 
  The judges who reviewed the entries said they were struck by the
variety:
  abstract designs, computer graphics, Jesus as a homeless person, Jesus
in
  outer space cradling the Earth, a Jesus with superhero biceps.
 
  ``I think Jesus would have liked this contest,'' said one of the judges,
  Pattie Wigand Sporrong of Catholic Theological Union in Chicago. ``It
didn't
  have a lot of boundaries and barriers.''
 
  McKenzie, 51, is a Brooklyn native who moved to Vermont in 1976. Her
base is
  Island Pond, a small town in the sparsely populated northeastern corner
of
  the state where she sometimes paints 12 hours at a stretch in the wing
of a
  135-year-old house.
 
  ```Jesus of the People' simply came through me,'' McKenzie said. ``I
feel as
  though I am only a vehicle for its existence.''
 
  The 50,000-circulation National Catholic Reporter, based in Kansas City,
Mo.,
  and founded in 1964, has taken pride in its independence, its support
for
  ecumenical reforms and its willingness to provoke debate.
 
  Farrell, in a column in the new issue, predicted the choice of ``Jesus
of the
  People'' would carry on that tradition.
 
  ``We got a strong impression that the era of the blond, blue-eyed Jesus
is
  over,'' he wrote. ``When the church was overwhelmingly a Western
institution,
  we made Jesus in our likeness. ... This work of art may be prophetic of
where
  and how Christianity will flourish in the next millennium or two.''

 Ahh ha ha ha ha ha haha ha ha .

 Next decade, when the Koreans and other Asians trade in their heritage for
 Western superstitions, Jesus will have slanted eyes and a yellowish tinge.

 The TRUTH is that Jesus probably looked like Woody Allen without glasses.
 Or perhaps, Gene Wilder. Or, if Christians are really lucky, Bernard
Schwartz
 a.k.a. Tony Curtis.

 Joshua2

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
 screeds are not allowed