Re: Can you help me about building of Fedroa17 ?

2012-12-20 Thread 史周波
于 2012年12月19日 11:19, 史周波 写道:
 hi all
 I have encountersome building problems, Fellowing is building message.

 here Env is Fedroa17 + Gcc4.7 + Dev300M20 source. after I have build on
 Fedroa17+Gcc4.7 , Fellowing error come into being.

 Entering /home/dev6-main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel

 Making: all_gcc3_uno.dpslo
 Compiling: bridges/unxlngi6.pro/misc/gcc3_uno_version.c
 Compiling: bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx
 In file included from
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_algobase.h:35:0,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_vector.h:36,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hashtable.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hash_map.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/hash_map:27,
 from /home/dev6-main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:35:
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/cstddef:42:20: error:
 '__std_alias::ptrdiff_t' has not been declared
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/cstddef:43:20: error:
 '__std_alias::size_t' has not been declared
 In file included from
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/cstring:32:0,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_algobase.h:39,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_vector.h:36,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hashtable.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hash_map.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/hash_map:27,
 from /home/dev6-main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:35:
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/using/cstring:1:20:
 error: '__std_alias::size_t' has not been declared
 In file included from
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_algobase.h:47:0,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_vector.h:36,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hashtable.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hash_map.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/hash_map:27,
 from /home/dev6-main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:35:
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/cstdlib:44:20: error:
 '__std_alias::size_t' has not been declared
 In file included from
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/new:50:0,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_alloc.h:60,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_vector.h:40,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hashtable.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hash_map.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/hash_map:27,
 from /home/dev6-main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:35:
 /usr/include/c++/4.7.0/new:93:31: error: declaration of 'operator new'
 as non-function
 /usr/include/c++/4.7.0/new:93:20: error: 'size_t' is not a member of 'std'
 /usr/include/c++/4.7.0/new:93:20: note: suggested alternatives:
 In file included from
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stddef.h:23:0,
 from /usr/include/../include/stdio.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stdio.h:22,
 from /home/dev6-main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:31:
 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.7.0/include/../include/stddef.h:213:22:
 note: 'size_t'
 In file included from
 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/cxxabi.h:50:0,
 from /home/dev6-main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:34:
 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/i686-redhat-linux/bits/c++config.h:173:24:
 note: '_STL::size_t'
 In file included from
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/new:50:0,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_alloc.h:60,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_vector.h:40,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hashtable.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stl/_hash_map.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/hash_map:27,
 from /home/dev6-main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:35:
 /usr/include/c++/4.7.0/new:95:33: error: declaration of 'operator new
 []' as non-function
 /usr/include/c++/4.7.0/new:95:22: error: 'size_t' is not a member of 'std'
 /usr/include/c++/4.7.0/new:95:22: note: suggested alternatives:
 In file included from
 /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stddef.h:23:0,
 from /usr/include/../include/stdio.h:34,
 from /home/dev6-main/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/inc/stl/stdio.h:22,
 from /home/dev6-main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/except.cxx:31:
 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.7.0/include/../include/stddef.h:213:22:
 note: 'size_t'
 In file included from
 

Re: Native lang, pootle information needs changes...

2012-12-20 Thread Andrea Pescetti

Kay Schenk wrote:

We have Native Language information on the project web site:
http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.htm
which also directs folks to a local Pootle User Guide on the wiki:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Pootle_User_Guide ...
Is there someplace else they should be going?


Actually, the page is here
http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html
and it definitely shouldn't point people to the Pootle User Guide but to 
http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html


Regards,
  Andrea.


Re: Equivalence in iBook Author

2012-12-20 Thread Inge Wallin
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 00:34:19 you wrote:
 Inge,
 
 On 12-12-19, at 18:13 , Inge Wallin i...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
  On Friday, December 14, 2012 13:39:25 Sylvain DENIS wrote:
  Hello,
  
  I make stands and often I made small requests. The last appeared after
  the release of a software in Apple. In education, many teachers use
  the software iBooks Author. He realizes ePub with additional features
  (such as interactions). Is it possible to make the same kind with AOO?
  There is the plugin Writer2epub but it is far from complete.
  This is a strong demand in Belgium and France.
  Thank you for your response
  
  You could take a look at Calligra Author[1]. It's more or less exactly
  what you're looking for. It's a new member of the Calligra Suite
  especially made for creating ebooks.
  
  Well...  In theory anyway. The first version hasn't actually been
  released yet. That's going to happen at the beginning of January. There
  is a release candidate out now which you can try out. It can export both
  to epub2 and mobi formats and right now we are working on cover images
  and adding epub3 features like support for MathML and multimedia
  (embedded video). Calligra Author itself can already handle both
  (although the first version has somewhat basic handling of math formulas
  to be honest) but the export filter cannot yet.
  
  
  [1] http://www.calligra.org/
 
 I'd like to try it out but my primary device is Mac OS X. I can use a
 virtualizer easily enough but my usual reaction to Windows is typical, if
 unprintable. KDE I can manage easily enough but if there is a Mac OS X
 binary that's pre-pre ready, I'd be game to give it a spin. You can send
 me info offline, if you like to preserve peace.
 
 BTW, Calligra is overall quite nice—a great job of coding and management.
 
 If I get a copy of the Author for OS X, I'll also be comparing it to
 Scrivener, which I've come to rather like for DTP, though of course, I am
 most comfortable with AOO.
 
 Cheers
 Louis

Hi Louis,

You can try the release candidate on any Linux distribution that packages it. 
Or you could try it on Windows by downloading it from KO GmbH, my company 
(although with your stated views on Windows that may not be so attractive :) 
).

Unfortunately there is still nobody who has packaged Calligra for Mac yet and 
released packages. The good news is that there is now a serious effort going 
on. One of the Calligra developers is doing exactly this and I hope that he 
will be read when the real release comes out in a couple of weeks.

Regarding Author itself you may become disappointed with the first version. We 
started the development a bit into the development cycle and Calligra now has 
a 4 month release cycle. So we failed to achieve our ambitious goals for 2.6, 
which is the upcoming Calligra version. Right now Calligra Author is not much 
more than Calligra Words with a rather good export to EPUB and MOBI formats.

What is there, though, is the vision. We want Author to be *the* tool that is 
useful for all writers from concept to publication. This is different from, 
say, Scrivener which is very good in the concept and writing phases but more 
or less useless in the review and publishing phases. Author will eventually 
have the people/scene/item databases that makes Scrivener so powerful but in 
addition it will still be a real word processor with its support for common 
formats (ODF and MS doc/docx), annotations, change tracking and so on. This 
means that it's useful for interaction with reviewers, proof readers and 
publishers when the first draft of the book is ready.

But my ultimate goal is the emerging education market. In my view the text 
books of the future will contain multimedia, animations and interactive 
contents. Calligra already has support for video in the documents and this 
will be handled in export to EPUB3 in the next version. Except for iBook 
Author from Apple there is *no* application that I know of that can write 
contents like this except for applications like Sigil that work directoly on 
the xhtml level inside the EPUB. 

-Inge


Re: Native lang, pootle information needs changes...

2012-12-20 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 12/20/12 9:30 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
 Kay Schenk wrote:
 We have Native Language information on the project web site:
 http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.htm
 which also directs folks to a local Pootle User Guide on the wiki:
 http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Pootle_User_Guide ...
 Is there someplace else they should be going?
 
 Actually, the page is here
 http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html
 and it definitely shouldn't point people to the Pootle User Guide but to
 http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html

we should check if all necessary information is available on
http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html and should change the wiki
to point to this pages. Or we should simply update the wiki which is
easier to maintain and should link to this.

Information about the gsicheck
(http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Gsicheck) for example is very useful as
long as we have the sdf files.

Such info should contain tips and tricks what to do and what not, for
example never change id's or hid's or hrefs. Today it took me 2 hours to
fix many of these mistakes in a new prepared sdf file. The errors are in
the po files and we should try to minimize such problems.

Juergen


Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Kevin Grignon


On Dec 20, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com wrote:

Hi List,
 
 Talking about palettes is always difficult - at the end, it's a question of 
 taste. Nonetheless, we need a palette which is by default installed with the 
 office. You all know the current one (for years ;-)) which I think is far 
 from optimal. Thus, I analyzed the current one and want to share my findings. 
 From that, I want to propose a change for our next release. Also probably not 
 optimal, but optimal in this field depends on the user's eye and cannot be 
 met by a single palette anyways.
 
 Talking about palettes is also difficult since you need to 'see' something - 
 pictures say more than words. To make that easier, I have prepared some data. 
 Please look at
 
 A Impress document containing two slides 
 (http://people.apache.org/~alg/Palette/palette.odp)
 The two slides as png's for convenience 
 (http://people.apache.org/~alg/Palette/palette.png, 
 http://people.apache.org/~alg/Palette/palette2.png)
 
 The following thext refers to figures there, so please take a look to see 
 what the text is about (...if you want to continue reading ;-))
 
 The current (old?) AOO Palette, It's made up of five groups (from my 
 perspective):
 
 (a) The 16 VGA colors: These come originally from the times where only 16 
 colors were possible and are in hex color notation exactly all eight 
 combinations of red/green/blue on or off, plus these in half intensity. It 
 *had* technical reasons, but these colors do not have any special meaning for 
 the user today (well, for the programmer). Anyways, they are a result of old 
 technical limitations. I think they are ugly and lead to ugly results when 
 using them directly (but that's my impression).
 
 (b) The 'Main' Colors: 56 colors which try to build up to eight 
 gradient-stepped ranges, e.g. orange. These ranges are *not* equidistantly 
 spread, but somewhat wild/random (see e.g. the reds). I do not know where 
 they historically come from, but I guess they were done by a deveoper at 
 these days. There are some nice colors among them, but not too many. I always 
 search for useful colors there
 
 (c) The Pale colors: These seem to be younger than the others, may have to do 
 historically with the StarOffice 5.2 color theme, but I'm not sure. Not too 
 bad, not too good a selection. A group of seven colors which form a nice kind 
 of 'schema' and make your presentation look 'acceptable' when using them 
 together.
 
 (d) The Chart colors: 12 colors used in the new chart module written some 
 years ago. AFAIK these were added at that time especially to support the user 
 having colors at hand corresponding to the default chart colors. Nice. Useful.
 
 (e) 'Nice' Colors: A sub-group from (b). One is fix, it's the mentioned 'Blue 
 9' which is currently the default color for objects and has to be in the 
 palette. I personally like (and often use) 'Blue Gray'. These are a question 
 of taste, I would reccomend the named ones, but we need to collect 'your' 
 favorites here. Keep in mind to keep this number low (probably 4-5) and do 
 not forget that the color you like were not choosen freely, but *because* you 
 were limited to the offered ones, so it might be a compromize you are just 
 used to.
 
 Quite a mix. I compared it with Syphony's palette and there completely new 
 colors are used. One interesting aspect are the white/gray/black ones: In our 
 current palette these are divided between (a) (black, white and two grays) 
 and (b) (the rest, gray 80% .. gray 20%). This is of course because the first 
 four grays are technically in the old VGA palette. I more than once were mad 
 about finding the correct gray in our palette, because of the bad positioning 
 in it. Symphony has all needed grays in one draw as first entries in the 
 palette (what I would expect nowadays).
 
 Thus, I propose:
 - Basically use Symphony palette
 - Preserve some nice olors from our old palette, but not more than 4 or 5. 
 The default color needs to be preserved (blue 9). I propose to only keep 
 'Blue Gray', but let's see which other colors are favorites here...
 - Add the Pale colors
 - Add the Chart colors
 
 The result is 'hand crafted' in the docs linked above, please have a look :-)
 
 Another aspect of the new palette is that it copies from Symphony the use of 
 '12-er groups' which look nice when you order the palette in a way that 12 
 colors are in a row, please see the picture. This could be a part of our 
 sidepane in progress.
 
 One more hint: This palette offers defaults to the user after AOO is newly 
 installed, not more (and not less). It can be changed by the user anytime. 
 Colors can be added/deleted by the user. This has no technical limitations in 
 the sense that changing the palette may influence existing ODF's or other 
 written files. E.g. the chart colors are there to not have to look for them, 
 but can be added/removed by the user anytime (they are *not* the 

Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Armin Le Grand

Hi Kevin,

On 20.12.2012 12:01, Kevin Grignon wrote:
snip


Armin,

Great enhancement. In fact this is in the UX backlog.


Yes, it is, but we need to discuss it and someone has to do it ;-)



Regards,
Kevin
  





Sincerely,
Armin
--
ALG


Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread RGB ES
2012/12/20 Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com

 Hi List,

 Talking about palettes is always difficult - at the end, it's a question
 of taste. Nonetheless, we need a palette which is by default installed with
 the office. You all know the current one (for years ;-)) which I think is
 far from optimal. Thus, I analyzed the current one and want to share my
 findings. From that, I want to propose a change for our next release. Also
 probably not optimal, but optimal in this field depends on the user's eye
 and cannot be met by a single palette anyways.

 Talking about palettes is also difficult since you need to 'see' something
 - pictures say more than words. To make that easier, I have prepared some
 data. Please look at

 A Impress document containing two slides (http://people.apache.org/~**
 alg/Palette/palette.odphttp://people.apache.org/~alg/Palette/palette.odp
 )
 The two slides as png's for convenience (http://people.apache.org/~**
 alg/Palette/palette.pnghttp://people.apache.org/~alg/Palette/palette.png,
 http://people.apache.org/~alg/**Palette/palette2.pnghttp://people.apache.org/~alg/Palette/palette2.png
 )

 The following thext refers to figures there, so please take a look to see
 what the text is about (...if you want to continue reading ;-))

 The current (old?) AOO Palette, It's made up of five groups (from my
 perspective):

 (a) The 16 VGA colors: These come originally from the times where only 16
 colors were possible and are in hex color notation exactly all eight
 combinations of red/green/blue on or off, plus these in half intensity. It
 *had* technical reasons, but these colors do not have any special meaning
 for the user today (well, for the programmer). Anyways, they are a result
 of old technical limitations. I think they are ugly and lead to ugly
 results when using them directly (but that's my impression).

 (b) The 'Main' Colors: 56 colors which try to build up to eight
 gradient-stepped ranges, e.g. orange. These ranges are *not* equidistantly
 spread, but somewhat wild/random (see e.g. the reds). I do not know where
 they historically come from, but I guess they were done by a deveoper at
 these days. There are some nice colors among them, but not too many. I
 always search for useful colors there

 (c) The Pale colors: These seem to be younger than the others, may have to
 do historically with the StarOffice 5.2 color theme, but I'm not sure. Not
 too bad, not too good a selection. A group of seven colors which form a
 nice kind of 'schema' and make your presentation look 'acceptable' when
 using them together.

 (d) The Chart colors: 12 colors used in the new chart module written some
 years ago. AFAIK these were added at that time especially to support the
 user having colors at hand corresponding to the default chart colors. Nice.
 Useful.

 (e) 'Nice' Colors: A sub-group from (b). One is fix, it's the mentioned
 'Blue 9' which is currently the default color for objects and has to be in
 the palette. I personally like (and often use) 'Blue Gray'. These are a
 question of taste, I would reccomend the named ones, but we need to collect
 'your' favorites here. Keep in mind to keep this number low (probably 4-5)
 and do not forget that the color you like were not choosen freely, but
 *because* you were limited to the offered ones, so it might be a compromize
 you are just used to.

 Quite a mix. I compared it with Syphony's palette and there completely new
 colors are used. One interesting aspect are the white/gray/black ones: In
 our current palette these are divided between (a) (black, white and two
 grays) and (b) (the rest, gray 80% .. gray 20%). This is of course because
 the first four grays are technically in the old VGA palette. I more than
 once were mad about finding the correct gray in our palette, because of the
 bad positioning in it. Symphony has all needed grays in one draw as first
 entries in the palette (what I would expect nowadays).

 Thus, I propose:
 - Basically use Symphony palette
 - Preserve some nice olors from our old palette, but not more than 4 or 5.
 The default color needs to be preserved (blue 9). I propose to only keep
 'Blue Gray', but let's see which other colors are favorites here...
 - Add the Pale colors
 - Add the Chart colors

 The result is 'hand crafted' in the docs linked above, please have a look
 :-)

 Another aspect of the new palette is that it copies from Symphony the use
 of '12-er groups' which look nice when you order the palette in a way that
 12 colors are in a row, please see the picture. This could be a part of our
 sidepane in progress.

 One more hint: This palette offers defaults to the user after AOO is newly
 installed, not more (and not less). It can be changed by the user anytime.
 Colors can be added/deleted by the user. This has no technical limitations
 in the sense that changing the palette may influence existing ODF's or
 other written files. E.g. the chart colors are there to not have to look
 for them, 

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Apache OpenOffice 4 logo proposals...

2012-12-20 Thread Rui
Rui Ogawa

Atenção! Caso haja documentos de escritório anexados neste e-mail, eles
poderão estar no formato ODF, um padrão aberto, gratuito e homologado pela
ISO e ABNT. Para abrir e editá-los, basta baixar e instalar o  Apache
OpenOffice.org em http://www.openoffice.org/download/

Seu sistema trava e pega vírus? O meu não. Use Debian, o Sistema
Operacional Universal! http://www.debian.org/ http://www.ubuntu-br.org/


2012/12/20 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com

 On 12/20/12 6:14 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
  imacat,
Your comments are so professional! :-)
Personally I like this logo design more comparing to other candidates
 in
  wiki
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.x+-+Logo+Explorations
 .
  Thanks Michael!
While we may also want to update the app icon design as the next step
 for
  consistent LF...
 

 I think Michaels proposal is the beginning of hopefully more. I
 personally see a reused old orb + some new elements. But the squares
 remind me to windows and the colors don't fit really together from my
 point of view.


Actually, the square leads us to something from microsoft... this was my
first impression


 We should think about something really new and fresh with or without the
 gulls.

 We should think for what OpenOffice and Apache stands for

 - free office software for the public good
 - for many million users all over the world
 - many languages
 - 

 We should think about something that can maybe visualize some of these
 attributes and can transport the message in one or multiple combined
 graphical elements.

 Too bad that I am no designer, but I will try to think about ideas and
 will at least share my ideas with you.

 Juergen


  - Shenfeng (Simon)
 
 
 
 
  2012/12/20 imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
 
  Some honest thoughts:
 
   1. These flat 3D plates feel a little weird.  The lights of the
  plates has the focus effect, but the lights of the plates have not.
 
   2. I cannot see the connection of these plates with our four
  components easily, as the colors of Writer, Calc, Impress and Base are
  not Blue, Orange, Green and Purple.  And we have other components such
  as Math and Draw.
 
   3. The directions of the lights are contradictory.  The lights of
  the orb come from above, while the lights of the plates (and also the
  plate of the orb) come from right.
 
  But still, thanks you very much for this great effort.
 
  On 2012/12/20 09:33, Michael Acevedo said:
  Greetings to the AOO Team!
 
  Hello, after a few months of inactivity I've decided to get back in
 touch
  with the AOO community. First, congratulations to the AOO team on
  a successful graduation into a top-level Apache project from the Apache
  Incubator.
 
  Now the reason on why I am writing this email is to formally submit a
  logo
  proposal for the next version of the Apache OpenOffice 4.X logo.
  Previously, I submitted an initial logo on the Apache OpenOffice
 Google+
  community but I went back to the drawing board and created a second
  version
  of the logo that both pays respect to the previous Apache OpenOffice
 orb,
  but modernizes the look of the overall logo by adding 4 colored squares
  that represent the four corners of our office suite (Writer, Calc,
  Impress,
  and Base) and utilizing a streamlined font.
 
  Without further introductions, below I present my official submission
 for
  the Apache OpenOffice 4.X logo.
 
  This first logo, is the proposed official logo for the project that
 would
  be used for our webpage and some other materials.
 
 
 
 https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-lETVSrwcgJc/UNJpH6G1sxI/ABg/JnpNrXdRgUo/s653/AOO%25204%2520LOGO%2520v2-5%2520Small%2520copy.jpg
 
  There's a secondary logo, which is basically the same logo but changes
  the
  proportion of the OpenOffice orb making it better suited for the splash
  screen that appears at the launch of the application.
 
 
 
 https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-uy8gU24uBZw/UNJpH8UiKiI/ABk/xfXTQjO8iQg/s912/AOO%25204%2520LOGO%2520v2-2.png
 
  Hope you guys like it and Happy holidays!
 
 
 
  --
  Best regards,
  imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
  PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
 
  Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
  Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
  Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
  OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
  EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
  Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/
 
 
 




Re: [PROPOSAL] New Apache OpenOffice 4 logo proposals...

2012-12-20 Thread janI
I am also no desgner, and like the more fresh look.

However I showed to a friend visiting, and the first reaction was...oooh
AOO is already ready for windows8, it seems that the 4 squares (not
identical) are used quite a lot inside windows8.

If that is the case, we should change itmaybe not use squares but e.g.
balloons.

We also have to remember that it must be convertable (or redrawn) as a
favicon, that is only 16x16.

thanks for taking time to make the proposal, and despite my concerns it is
the best I have seen so far !

Jan.

On 20 December 2012 11:02, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12/20/12 6:14 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
  imacat,
Your comments are so professional! :-)
Personally I like this logo design more comparing to other candidates
 in
  wiki
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.x+-+Logo+Explorations
 .
  Thanks Michael!
While we may also want to update the app icon design as the next step
 for
  consistent LF...
 

 I think Michaels proposal is the beginning of hopefully more. I
 personally see a reused old orb + some new elements. But the squares
 remind me to windows and the colors don't fit really together from my
 point of view.

 We should think about something really new and fresh with or without the
 gulls.

 We should think for what OpenOffice and Apache stands for

 - free office software for the public good
 - for many million users all over the world
 - many languages
 - 

 We should think about something that can maybe visualize some of these
 attributes and can transport the message in one or multiple combined
 graphical elements.

 Too bad that I am no designer, but I will try to think about ideas and
 will at least share my ideas with you.

 Juergen


  - Shenfeng (Simon)
 
 
 
 
  2012/12/20 imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
 
  Some honest thoughts:
 
   1. These flat 3D plates feel a little weird.  The lights of the
  plates has the focus effect, but the lights of the plates have not.
 
   2. I cannot see the connection of these plates with our four
  components easily, as the colors of Writer, Calc, Impress and Base are
  not Blue, Orange, Green and Purple.  And we have other components such
  as Math and Draw.
 
   3. The directions of the lights are contradictory.  The lights of
  the orb come from above, while the lights of the plates (and also the
  plate of the orb) come from right.
 
  But still, thanks you very much for this great effort.
 
  On 2012/12/20 09:33, Michael Acevedo said:
  Greetings to the AOO Team!
 
  Hello, after a few months of inactivity I've decided to get back in
 touch
  with the AOO community. First, congratulations to the AOO team on
  a successful graduation into a top-level Apache project from the Apache
  Incubator.
 
  Now the reason on why I am writing this email is to formally submit a
  logo
  proposal for the next version of the Apache OpenOffice 4.X logo.
  Previously, I submitted an initial logo on the Apache OpenOffice
 Google+
  community but I went back to the drawing board and created a second
  version
  of the logo that both pays respect to the previous Apache OpenOffice
 orb,
  but modernizes the look of the overall logo by adding 4 colored squares
  that represent the four corners of our office suite (Writer, Calc,
  Impress,
  and Base) and utilizing a streamlined font.
 
  Without further introductions, below I present my official submission
 for
  the Apache OpenOffice 4.X logo.
 
  This first logo, is the proposed official logo for the project that
 would
  be used for our webpage and some other materials.
 
 
 
 https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-lETVSrwcgJc/UNJpH6G1sxI/ABg/JnpNrXdRgUo/s653/AOO%25204%2520LOGO%2520v2-5%2520Small%2520copy.jpg
 
  There's a secondary logo, which is basically the same logo but changes
  the
  proportion of the OpenOffice orb making it better suited for the splash
  screen that appears at the launch of the application.
 
 
 
 https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-uy8gU24uBZw/UNJpH8UiKiI/ABk/xfXTQjO8iQg/s912/AOO%25204%2520LOGO%2520v2-2.png
 
  Hope you guys like it and Happy holidays!
 
 
 
  --
  Best regards,
  imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
  PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
 
  Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
  Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
  Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
  OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
  EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
  Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/
 
 
 




Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Kevin Grignon


On Dec 20, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com wrote:

Hi Kevin,
 
 On 20.12.2012 12:01, Kevin Grignon wrote:
 snip
 
 Armin,
 
 Great enhancement. In fact this is in the UX backlog.
 
 Yes, it is, but we need to discuss it and someone has to do it ;-)
 

Let's use some mockups to make it real. This will help the discussion and drive 
an owner. 

Kevin


 
 Regards,
 Kevin
  
 
 
 Sincerely,
Armin
 --
 ALG


Re: [PROPOSAL] New Apache OpenOffice 4 logo proposals...

2012-12-20 Thread RGB ES
2012/12/20 janI j...@apache.org

 I am also no desgner, and like the more fresh look.

 However I showed to a friend visiting, and the first reaction was...oooh
 AOO is already ready for windows8, it seems that the 4 squares (not
 identical) are used quite a lot inside windows8.


Indeed, this is a problem: even if last time I used a windows machine was
several years ago the immediate reaction to the squares was this looks
like a MS logo (the rest of the logo is just fine).

A different approach could be the use of a gradient instead of the blue for
the orb fill: let the orb with its actual shape, no metal border and no
squares, but fill it with a gradient that displays all the colours of AOO
apps.

(The image is clear on my mind, but I lack the skills to build it).

On a related note: another image clear in my mind is a version of the orb
build not with a continuous background, but with small text written on
several languages and several scrips, to stress that AOO is for everyone,
on every language. Something like an ASCII art logo.

Regards
Ricardo




 If that is the case, we should change itmaybe not use squares but e.g.
 balloons.

 We also have to remember that it must be convertable (or redrawn) as a
 favicon, that is only 16x16.

 thanks for taking time to make the proposal, and despite my concerns it is
 the best I have seen so far !

 Jan.

 On 20 December 2012 11:02, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:

  On 12/20/12 6:14 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
   imacat,
 Your comments are so professional! :-)
 Personally I like this logo design more comparing to other candidates
  in
   wiki
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.x+-+Logo+Explorations
  .
   Thanks Michael!
 While we may also want to update the app icon design as the next step
  for
   consistent LF...
  
 
  I think Michaels proposal is the beginning of hopefully more. I
  personally see a reused old orb + some new elements. But the squares
  remind me to windows and the colors don't fit really together from my
  point of view.
 
  We should think about something really new and fresh with or without the
  gulls.
 
  We should think for what OpenOffice and Apache stands for
 
  - free office software for the public good
  - for many million users all over the world
  - many languages
  - 
 
  We should think about something that can maybe visualize some of these
  attributes and can transport the message in one or multiple combined
  graphical elements.
 
  Too bad that I am no designer, but I will try to think about ideas and
  will at least share my ideas with you.
 
  Juergen
 
 
   - Shenfeng (Simon)
  
  
  
  
   2012/12/20 imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
  
   Some honest thoughts:
  
1. These flat 3D plates feel a little weird.  The lights of the
   plates has the focus effect, but the lights of the plates have not.
  
2. I cannot see the connection of these plates with our four
   components easily, as the colors of Writer, Calc, Impress and Base are
   not Blue, Orange, Green and Purple.  And we have other components such
   as Math and Draw.
  
3. The directions of the lights are contradictory.  The lights of
   the orb come from above, while the lights of the plates (and also the
   plate of the orb) come from right.
  
   But still, thanks you very much for this great effort.
  
   On 2012/12/20 09:33, Michael Acevedo said:
   Greetings to the AOO Team!
  
   Hello, after a few months of inactivity I've decided to get back in
  touch
   with the AOO community. First, congratulations to the AOO team on
   a successful graduation into a top-level Apache project from the
 Apache
   Incubator.
  
   Now the reason on why I am writing this email is to formally submit a
   logo
   proposal for the next version of the Apache OpenOffice 4.X logo.
   Previously, I submitted an initial logo on the Apache OpenOffice
  Google+
   community but I went back to the drawing board and created a second
   version
   of the logo that both pays respect to the previous Apache OpenOffice
  orb,
   but modernizes the look of the overall logo by adding 4 colored
 squares
   that represent the four corners of our office suite (Writer, Calc,
   Impress,
   and Base) and utilizing a streamlined font.
  
   Without further introductions, below I present my official submission
  for
   the Apache OpenOffice 4.X logo.
  
   This first logo, is the proposed official logo for the project that
  would
   be used for our webpage and some other materials.
  
  
  
 
 https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-lETVSrwcgJc/UNJpH6G1sxI/ABg/JnpNrXdRgUo/s653/AOO%25204%2520LOGO%2520v2-5%2520Small%2520copy.jpg
  
   There's a secondary logo, which is basically the same logo but
 changes
   the
   proportion of the OpenOffice orb making it better suited for the
 splash
   screen that appears at the launch of the application.
  
  
  
 
 

Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Armin Le Grand

Hi Kevin,

On 20.12.2012 14:36, Kevin Grignon wrote:


On Dec 20, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com wrote:


Hi Kevin,

On 20.12.2012 12:01, Kevin Grignon wrote:
snip

Armin,

Great enhancement. In fact this is in the UX backlog.

Yes, it is, but we need to discuss it and someone has to do it ;-)


Let's use some mockups to make it real. This will help the discussion and drive 
an owner.


Please have a look at my initial proposal, there are mockups.

HTH!



Kevin



Regards,
Kevin
  


Sincerely,
Armin
--
ALG

--
ALG


Re: Identifiable and customizable color groups ? (Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Armin,

On 20.12.2012 12:09, Armin Le Grand wrote:

 On 20.12.2012 12:01, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
 snip
 This is an interesting view at the different color groups! It would be 
 great, if the UI would be
 able to distinguish those groups and gives hints to which group a color 
 belongs to when hovering
 over the colors.

 Such an approach might also allow for defining additional custom groups 
 (e.g. a group for the CI of
 an organization, various groups of colors for different projects, purposes, 
 etc.). Of course, there
 would be a need then for importing, editing, removing such customized color 
 groups. [The same might
 be interesting to do with predefined gradient fill patterns.]

 This was not my intent, but is a good idea! For now there will not be the 
 time to do something
 like that ('Palette-management' ?!), but I would ask you to file a feature 
 task so that this will
 not get lost. This does not guarantee that someone finds the time or it will 
 be done (as you
 probably know ;-)), but it can be found and refered to..
Sure, I understand.

But, if you had some time free at your fingertips, sometimes ...
;-)

---

Here is the requested RFE/issue: 
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121521.

Best regards

---rony



Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello;

Despite being so subjective, this is an extremely interesting subject.

I went googling around the subject and it is quite important, I mean, there are 
experts that
work on this stuff. For example, these guys will let you obtain a palette from 
a picture:
http://www.degraeve.com/color-palette/index.php


The first list of colors used as a basis for WWW standards were actually taken 
from the
X11 palette:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X11_color_names


If we were to adhere to some standard I guess that would be the starting point. 
Nevertheless,
this is a matter that is far from being standardized.

Looking at Symphony: I like the color palette but it still can be improved. If 
you slide over
the colors you can see names and while some are descriptive, most are not 
(cyan1, cyan 2)

There are certainly color professionals out there that have considered this and 
some colors
are popular enough to have a name:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colors_(compact)


I would suggest that we do take initially the Symphony palette but attempt to 
replace most
unnamed colors with something that can be identified by name in either of the 
lists above.
It's a lot of work and I am not volunteering though :(.

regards,

Pedro.







 Da: Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com
A: dev@openoffice.apache.org 
Inviato: Giovedì 20 Dicembre 2012 5:45
Oggetto: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially
 
    Hi List,

Talking about palettes is always difficult - at the end, it's a question of 
taste. Nonetheless, we need a palette which is by default installed with the 
office. You all know the current one (for years ;-)) which I think is far from 
optimal. Thus, I analyzed the current one and want to share my findings. From 
that, I want to propose a change for our next release. Also probably not 
optimal, but optimal in this field depends on the user's eye and cannot be met 
by a single palette anyways.

Talking about palettes is also difficult since you need to 'see' something - 
pictures say more than words. To make that easier, I have prepared some data. 
Please look at

A Impress document containing two slides 
(http://people.apache.org/~alg/Palette/palette.odp)
The two slides as png's for convenience 
(http://people.apache.org/~alg/Palette/palette.png, 
http://people.apache.org/~alg/Palette/palette2.png)

The following thext refers to figures there, so please take a look to see what 
the text is about (...if you want to continue reading ;-))

The current (old?) AOO Palette, It's made up of five groups (from my 
perspective):

(a) The 16 VGA colors: These come originally from the times where only 16 
colors were possible and are in hex color notation exactly all eight 
combinations of red/green/blue on or off, plus these in half intensity. It 
*had* technical reasons, but these colors do not have any special meaning for 
the user today (well, for the programmer). Anyways, they are a result of old 
technical limitations. I think they are ugly and lead to ugly results when 
using them directly (but that's my impression).

(b) The 'Main' Colors: 56 colors which try to build up to eight 
gradient-stepped ranges, e.g. orange. These ranges are *not* equidistantly 
spread, but somewhat wild/random (see e.g. the reds). I do not know where they 
historically come from, but I guess they were done by a deveoper at these 
days. There are some nice colors among them, but not too many. I always search 
for useful colors there

(c) The Pale colors: These seem to be younger than the others, may have to do 
historically with the StarOffice 5.2 color theme, but I'm not sure. Not too 
bad, not too good a selection. A group of seven colors which form a nice kind 
of 'schema' and make your presentation look 'acceptable' when using them 
together.

(d) The Chart colors: 12 colors used in the new chart module written some 
years ago. AFAIK these were added at that time especially to support the user 
having colors at hand corresponding to the default chart colors. Nice. Useful.

(e) 'Nice' Colors: A sub-group from (b). One is fix, it's the mentioned 'Blue 
9' which is currently the default color for objects and has to be in the 
palette. I personally like (and often use) 'Blue Gray'. These are a question 
of taste, I would reccomend the named ones, but we need to collect 'your' 
favorites here. Keep in mind to keep this number low (probably 4-5) and do not 
forget that the color you like were not choosen freely, but *because* you were 
limited to the offered ones, so it might be a compromize you are just used to.

Quite a mix. I compared it with Syphony's palette and there completely new 
colors are used. One interesting aspect are the white/gray/black ones: In our 
current palette these are divided between (a) (black, white and two grays) and 
(b) (the rest, gray 80% .. gray 20%). This is of course because the first four 
grays are technically in the old VGA palette. I more than once were 

Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni


Da: Pedro Giffuni 

Hello;

Despite being so subjective, this is an extremely interesting subject.

I went googling around the subject and it is quite important, I mean, there 
are experts that
work on this stuff. For example, these guys will let you obtain a palette from 
a picture:
http://www.degraeve.com/color-palette/index.php


The first list of colors used as a basis for WWW standards were actually taken 
from the
X11 palette:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X11_color_names


If we were to adhere to some standard I guess that would be the starting 
point. Nevertheless,
this is a matter that is far from being standardized.

Looking at Symphony: I like the color palette but it still can be improved. If 
you slide over
the colors you can see names and while some are descriptive, most are not 
(cyan1, cyan 2)

There are certainly color professionals out there that have considered this 
and some colors
are popular enough to have a name:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colors_(compact)


I would suggest that we do take initially the Symphony palette but attempt to 
replace most
unnamed colors with something that can be identified by name in either of the 
lists above.
It's a lot of work and I am not volunteering though :(.


Just following the last link 

Perhaps just sorting this list by hex value would provide a complete palette
for any use:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colors

regards,

Pedro.


Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Armin Le Grand

Hi Pedro,

On 20.12.2012 16:21, Pedro Giffuni wrote:

Hello;

Despite being so subjective, this is an extremely interesting subject.

I went googling around the subject and it is quite important, I mean, there are 
experts that
work on this stuff. For example, these guys will let you obtain a palette from 
a picture:
http://www.degraeve.com/color-palette/index.php

Yes, experts. Colors are a wide area...
Nice links, Pedro!



The first list of colors used as a basis for WWW standards were actually taken 
from the
X11 palette:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X11_color_names


If we were to adhere to some standard I guess that would be the starting point. 
Nevertheless,
this is a matter that is far from being standardized.

Looking at Symphony: I like the color palette but it still can be improved. If 
you slide over
the colors you can see names and while some are descriptive, most are not 
(cyan1, cyan 2)

There are certainly color professionals out there that have considered this and 
some colors
are popular enough to have a name:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colors_(compact)


Good idea. I already thought about having a central place in the office 
with all known named colors (e.g. the Colors in the SVG standard, 
already in svgio module for example). The problem is that there are 24 
million colors (0xff^3). Despite that, there may be serveral names per 
color. Despite that, the names are not translated. Are color names 
translatable...?





I would suggest that we do take initially the Symphony palette but attempt to 
replace most
unnamed colors with something that can be identified by name in either of the 
lists above.
It's a lot of work and I am not volunteering though :(.


I follow that suggestion: For now, let's use the (extended, see 
proposal) Symphony palette, but make a follow-up to find better color names.


In the long run supporting multiple palettes (as Rony suggested, too) 
will be unavoidable I think; there are sooo many interesting colors, 
alone following your links and all the slightly different tones of 
white. And all that is only in RGB color space...




regards,

Pedro.


Sincerely,
Armin
--
ALG


Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni




- Messaggio originale -
 Da: Armin Le Grand 
 
      Hi Pedro,
 
 On 20.12.2012 16:21, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
  Hello;
...
 
  Looking at Symphony: I like the color palette but it still can be improved. 
 If you slide over
  the colors you can see names and while some are descriptive, most are not 
 (cyan1, cyan 2)
 
  There are certainly color professionals out there that have considered this 
 and some colors
  are popular enough to have a name:
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colors_(compact)
 
 Good idea. I already thought about having a central place in the office 
 with all known named colors (e.g. the Colors in the SVG standard, 
 already in svgio module for example). The problem is that there are 24 
 million colors (0xff^3). Despite that, there may be serveral names per 
 color. Despite that, the names are not translated. Are color names 
 translatable...?


Hmm.. there are indeed a lot of named colors: I thought I was looking at
the complete list but it was only A-M.

Yes, color names are translatable but even online translation services
should give acceptable results. Good thing there are international
volunteers that can help :).
  
 
 
  I would suggest that we do take initially the Symphony palette but attempt 
 to replace most
  unnamed colors with something that can be identified by name in either of 
 the lists above.
  It's a lot of work and I am not volunteering though :(.
 
 I follow that suggestion: For now, let's use the (extended, see 
 proposal) Symphony palette, but make a follow-up to find better color names.
 

Great!

 In the long run supporting multiple palettes (as Rony suggested, too) 
 will be unavoidable I think; there are sooo many interesting colors, 
 alone following your links and all the slightly different tones of 
 white. And all that is only in RGB color space...
 

Maybe we should start taking color seriously some day and play with
something like CMS ;).

http://www.littlecms.com/

cheers,

Pedro.



Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

2012-12-20 Thread Andrea Pescetti

Armin Le Grand wrote:

the names are not translated. Are color names
translatable...?


Sure; we had the infamous Soylent Green incident, for example:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.localization/11766


I follow that suggestion: For now, let's use the (extended, see
proposal) Symphony palette, but make a follow-up to find better color
names.


Just don't be too creative with names, since translation volunteers 
won't see the actual colors when translating, but only the names!


Regards,
  Andrea.


Request Mwiki account

2012-12-20 Thread Manuel del Valle
I'd like to request an MWiki account.
User names (in order of preference):

m.dv
mdv
abelinux

Thanks!
Regards,

Manuel
  

Is support for legacy file formats saved?

2012-12-20 Thread Ralf Lehmeier

Hello!
LO has removed all files with the 4.0 up to and including StarOffice 5.2 
support.

LO 4.0 with the old files can no longer work.
What is the plan in AOO? Will there be support for this in the future too?

Best regards R.Lehmeier



Re: [PROPOSAL] New Apache OpenOffice 4 logo proposals...

2012-12-20 Thread Michael Acevedo
My general consensus based on all the comments...

   1. I think that there is no need to change the current OpenOffice orb
   because of two reasons. The first the current design it's the best logo
   that the project put forward since its inception and actually gave the
   project logo a premium feel and has become the user's neumonic device to
   identify the AOO project (OpenOffice in general). The second reason is that
   the current logo design is simple, modern, and easy on the eyes, the only
   way I can think to improve the orb is by adding a bezel which to me fits
   nicely because it represents an office suite
   that brings together everything you'll need to get the job done.
   2. As for the application squares, I think we have something here that
   can be changed maybe the issue is with the shape. Let's see what I can
   think off...

I plan to have further proposals shortly.

Again thanks to all the positive feedback on the logo.


On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:41 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:

 On 20 December 2012 15:28, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:

  2012/12/20 janI j...@apache.org
 
   I am also no desgner, and like the more fresh look.
  
   However I showed to a friend visiting, and the first reaction
 was...oooh
   AOO is already ready for windows8, it seems that the 4 squares (not
   identical) are used quite a lot inside windows8.
  
 
  Indeed, this is a problem: even if last time I used a windows machine was
  several years ago the immediate reaction to the squares was this looks
  like a MS logo (the rest of the logo is just fine).
 
  A different approach could be the use of a gradient instead of the blue
 for
  the orb fill: let the orb with its actual shape, no metal border and no
  squares, but fill it with a gradient that displays all the colours of AOO
  apps.
 
  (The image is clear on my mind, but I lack the skills to build it).
 
  On a related note: another image clear in my mind is a version of the orb
  build not with a continuous background, but with small text written on
  several languages and several scrips, to stress that AOO is for everyone,
  on every language. Something like an ASCII art logo.
 
 +1 If that can be done...it would be a winner !!

 
  Regards
  Ricardo
 
 
 
  
   If that is the case, we should change itmaybe not use squares but
  e.g.
   balloons.
  
   We also have to remember that it must be convertable (or redrawn) as a
   favicon, that is only 16x16.
  
   thanks for taking time to make the proposal, and despite my concerns it
  is
   the best I have seen so far !
  
   Jan.
  
   On 20 December 2012 11:02, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  
On 12/20/12 6:14 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
 imacat,
   Your comments are so professional! :-)
   Personally I like this logo design more comparing to other
  candidates
in
 wiki
   
  
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.x+-+Logo+Explorations
.
 Thanks Michael!
   While we may also want to update the app icon design as the next
  step
for
 consistent LF...

   
I think Michaels proposal is the beginning of hopefully more. I
personally see a reused old orb + some new elements. But the squares
remind me to windows and the colors don't fit really together from my
point of view.
   
We should think about something really new and fresh with or without
  the
gulls.
   
We should think for what OpenOffice and Apache stands for
   
- free office software for the public good
- for many million users all over the world
- many languages
- 
   
We should think about something that can maybe visualize some of
 these
attributes and can transport the message in one or multiple combined
graphical elements.
   
Too bad that I am no designer, but I will try to think about ideas
 and
will at least share my ideas with you.
   
Juergen
   
   
 - Shenfeng (Simon)




 2012/12/20 imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw

 Some honest thoughts:

  1. These flat 3D plates feel a little weird.  The lights of
 the
 plates has the focus effect, but the lights of the plates have
 not.

  2. I cannot see the connection of these plates with our four
 components easily, as the colors of Writer, Calc, Impress and Base
  are
 not Blue, Orange, Green and Purple.  And we have other components
  such
 as Math and Draw.

  3. The directions of the lights are contradictory.  The
 lights
  of
 the orb come from above, while the lights of the plates (and also
  the
 plate of the orb) come from right.

 But still, thanks you very much for this great effort.

 On 2012/12/20 09:33, Michael Acevedo said:
 Greetings to the AOO Team!

 Hello, after a few months of inactivity I've decided to get back
 in
touch
 with the AOO community. First, congratulations to 

[QA] my tag [AW080] in Bugzilla

2012-12-20 Thread Regina Henschel

Hi all,

please do not wonder about the tag [AW080] in bugzilla. Those issues are 
about the branch AW080 from Armin. They contain problems I have found 
and I have submitted them as bugs as reminder. So they are documented 
and can be tested later on.


Feel free to add your results with branch AW080 same way.

Kind regards
Regina


Re: reference

2012-12-20 Thread Web Office Shop
Is there example of valid code for a combobox macro at Database Form?


is a bug ?

2012-12-20 Thread Galileo Teco Juárez
to execute command

soffice --headless --acept=socket,port=8100;urp;

i get

fontconfig warning /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/fonts/truetype/fc_local.conf
line 13: having multiple family in alias ins't supported and may not
works as expected

the command run fine


-- 
*Galileo Teco Juarez*
*Web:* http://80bits.wordpress.com
*Twitter:* @genitalico http://twitter.com/genitalico
*Linkedin:* http://mx.linkedin.com/pub/galileo-teco-ju%C3%A1rez/30/690/797


Re: [PROPOSAL] New Apache OpenOffice 4 logo proposals...

2012-12-20 Thread janI
I really like the pinwheel...and combine it with the suggestion of
replacing the flat color with small text, would just make it perfect.

I also think it is ok, that blue is in 3d and the pins flats, that seems
quite natural to me.

Jan.


On 20 December 2012 19:51, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:

 On 2012/12/20 13:06, Michael Acevedo said:
   Here's my personal insight on the logo decisions when it comes to
 the
  amount of squares and coloring scheme. The first is that I tried for
 hours
  how to integrate six squares into the logo and the problem that arose was
  that the logo looked too crowded. As a result I had to strike a
 compromise,
  pick the four applications or modules that embody an office suite in
  general which are the word processor, spreadsheet, presentation module,
 and
  database creator. OpenOffice is the only office suite that comes to
 memory
  that does have a formula editor and a radically unique graphics drawing
  program (closest analogue is Microsoft Publisher but Draw is a different
  animal).

 I see.  But there are other ways of representing the OpenOffice
 components instead of the square boxes.  I tried to make some as
 attached, although they are not finished works.  Please forgive me that
 I'm not a designer.  We can have a more lively design than square boxes.

 We can give up this idea of showing the components if that is too
 difficult.  But for some people, draw is more important than base.  It
 is simply not right to show only four components.

   Moving now to the color scheme, the colors for the squares that
  represent the office suite core components were inspired upon the AOO
 start
  center which has icons for the word, spreadsheet, presentation, and
  database modules. If you look closely, each of the icons there have a
 color
  code, the Writer document icon has blue accents, Calc document icon has
  green accents, Impress icon has orange accents, and the Base icon has
  violet accents. Therefore, it was a logical decision to color the squares
  accordingly.

 I know, but these colors do not match the colors of the components.
  That's why I said for the missing connection between the components and
 the colors.  Writer is silver-blue, not blue.  Base is dark red, not
 purple.  Seeing the colors on the four plates cannot remind people about
 our four components.

   When it comes to the lighting of the logo... I beg to differ. I'll
  need to sleep over that to see whether or not it is worth considering
  tweaking the lighting. In my honest opinion, I think the current lighting
  works fine for the logo.

 Please sleep well and take care of yourself.

 We do not have to stick on the lights of the orb.  My original point
 was about the contrary between the lights and the view angle of the orb
 and the plates.  I did not mean the plates need to follow the orb.  I
 just meant that the logo needs a consistent look and feel, consistent
 lights and view angles.  Or it is simply just not right.

 If the orb is 3-D with the focused light, all other parts has to be
 3-D with focused light.  If the plate is flat, all other parts has to be
 flat.

 Actually, we may give up or tweak the orb when necessary.  If we
 have to retain the old design for every logo revision, the only thing we
 can do is adding.  Then, we will have a very complicated logo in less
 than 3 years.  That is not right for the design work.

 I personally like the 3-D and focused light effect.  If it is too
 hard to apply the 3-D and focused light effect on other parts of the
 logo, we can simply remove the existing lights and apply new light and
 view angle on everything.  The only point is consistent.

 
  Thanks for the feedback.
 
 
 
  On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:31 PM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
 wrote:
 
  Some honest thoughts:
 
   1. These flat 3D plates feel a little weird.  The lights of the
  plates has the focus effect, but the lights of the plates have not.
 
   2. I cannot see the connection of these plates with our four
  components easily, as the colors of Writer, Calc, Impress and Base are
  not Blue, Orange, Green and Purple.  And we have other components such
  as Math and Draw.
 
   3. The directions of the lights are contradictory.  The lights of
  the orb come from above, while the lights of the plates (and also the
  plate of the orb) come from right.
 
  But still, thanks you very much for this great effort.
 
  On 2012/12/20 09:33, Michael Acevedo said:
  Greetings to the AOO Team!
 
  Hello, after a few months of inactivity I've decided to get back in
 touch
  with the AOO community. First, congratulations to the AOO team on
  a successful graduation into a top-level Apache project from the Apache
  Incubator.
 
  Now the reason on why I am writing this email is to formally submit a
  logo
  proposal for the next version of the Apache OpenOffice 4.X logo.
  Previously, I submitted an initial logo on 

Re: Google+ Community

2012-12-20 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Maurice Howe maur...@stny.rr.com wrote:
  Hmmm.  Got a 404 error msg.
 

 The long URL wrapped to another line, which confusing some mail clients.

 You can try this shorter URL:   http://s.apache.org/aoo-gpc

 Regards,

 -Rob


Do we want to highlight the google + community vis a vis the web home page
instead of just the Google + we have now? or have both? and, if so, how to
differentiate?





  Maurice Howe
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
  Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 6:12 PM
  To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
  Cc: market...@openoffice.apache.org; us...@openoffice.apache.org
  Subject: Google+ Community
 
  A follow up from a previous note.  We have a new Google+ Community set up
  for Apache OpenOffice.  You are welcome to join:
 
 
 https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/114598373874764163668/communities/103683488250
  592271079
 
  We've been beta testing it for a couple of weeks with a smaller group.
  One advantage, compared to the users mailing list, is the ease of sharing
  images.
 
  Regards,
 
  -Rob
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
  -
  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2637/5965 - Release Date: 12/16/12
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 




-- 

MzK

No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
 --
Aesop


Re: [PROPOSAL] New Apache OpenOffice 4 logo proposals...

2012-12-20 Thread Michael Acevedo
Here's an additional logo proposal. It has four different designs.

Hope you like them.

On Thursday, December 20, 2012, janI wrote:

 I really like the pinwheel...and combine it with the suggestion of
 replacing the flat color with small text, would just make it perfect.

 I also think it is ok, that blue is in 3d and the pins flats, that seems
 quite natural to me.

 Jan.


 On 20 December 2012 19:51, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:

  On 2012/12/20 13:06, Michael Acevedo said:
Here's my personal insight on the logo decisions when it comes to
  the
   amount of squares and coloring scheme. The first is that I tried for
  hours
   how to integrate six squares into the logo and the problem that arose
 was
   that the logo looked too crowded. As a result I had to strike a
  compromise,
   pick the four applications or modules that embody an office suite in
   general which are the word processor, spreadsheet, presentation module,
  and
   database creator. OpenOffice is the only office suite that comes to
  memory
   that does have a formula editor and a radically unique graphics drawing
   program (closest analogue is Microsoft Publisher but Draw is a
 different
   animal).
 
  I see.  But there are other ways of representing the OpenOffice
  components instead of the square boxes.  I tried to make some as
  attached, although they are not finished works.  Please forgive me that
  I'm not a designer.  We can have a more lively design than square boxes.
 
  We can give up this idea of showing the components if that is too
  difficult.  But for some people, draw is more important than base.  It
  is simply not right to show only four components.
 
Moving now to the color scheme, the colors for the squares that
   represent the office suite core components were inspired upon the AOO
  start
   center which has icons for the word, spreadsheet, presentation, and
   database modules. If you look closely, each of the icons there have a
  color
   code, the Writer document icon has blue accents, Calc document icon has
   green accents, Impress icon has orange accents, and the Base icon has
   violet accents. Therefore, it was a logical decision to color the
 squares
   accordingly.
 
  I know, but these colors do not match the colors of the components.
   That's why I said for the missing connection between the components and
  the colors.  Writer is silver-blue, not blue.  Base is dark red, not
  purple.  Seeing the colors on the four plates cannot remind people about
  our four components.
 
When it comes to the lighting of the logo... I beg to differ. I'll
   need to sleep over that to see whether or not it is worth considering
   tweaking the lighting. In my honest opinion, I think the current
 lighting
   works fine for the logo.
 
  Please sleep well and take care of yourself.
 
  We do not have to stick on the lights of the orb.  My original point
  was about the contrary between the lights and the view angle of the orb
  and the plates.  I did not mean the plates need to follow the orb.  I
  just meant that the logo needs a consistent look and feel, consistent
  lights and view angles.  Or it is simply just not right.
 
  If the orb is 3-D with the focused light, all other parts has to be
  3-D with focused light.  If the plate is flat, all other parts has to be
  flat.
 
  Actually, we may give up or tweak the orb when necessary.  If we
  have to retain the old design for every logo revision, the only thing we
  can do is adding.  Then, we will have a very complicated logo in less
  than 3 years.  That is not right for the design work.
 
  I personally like the 3-D and focused light effect.  If it is too
  hard to apply the 3-D and focused light effect on other parts of the
  logo, we can simply remove the existing lights and apply new light and
  view angle on everything.  The only point is consistent.
 
  
   Thanks for the feedback.
  
  
  
   On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:31 PM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
  wrote:
  
   Some honest thoughts:
  
1. These flat 3D plates feel a little weird.  The lights of the



-- 
Best,
Michael


Re: Apache Open Office 3.4.1

2012-12-20 Thread Kay Schenk
Deban--

I'm not sure what the problem was for you, but you might just try getting
the latest version directly from our download page:

http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html

and then installing it.

If you have more problems, you might try contacting the User Forums for
additional help.

http://forum.openoffice.org/

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Deb deba...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I got a message to download and install this new version.  It unpacked,
 then I clicked Next and it sait install would take :several minutes  but
 I see a progress bar with no motion at all and wait for over an hour with
 no progress at all.  I have Windows 7 and use firefox browser.  Please help
 me get this Open Office update.  You make it so difficult.

 deba...@yahoo.com




-- 

MzK

No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
 --
Aesop


Re: Native lang, pootle information needs changes...

2012-12-20 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 20/12/2012 janI wrote:

http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html

We should however really change the wording of 6), today it sounds as if we
do not care about reviewing the translations.


If it gives that impression, it must be changed. Note that the review 
we are talking about there is the review of the PO files by someone 
else, not the re-reading by the same translator or the QA that 
translators will be make on the test builds.



We should also add a specific  point about review requirements.


Whatever we add, keep in mind the case of translation teams made by 
one person only. We will still demand quality in that case, but we 
cannot count on peer review.



[Juergen] if all necessary information is available on
http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html and should change the wiki
to point to this pages. Or we should simply update the wiki which is
easier to maintain and should link to this.


The Tips for translators section can surely be moved to the wiki. It 
doesn't overlap much with the Pootle information there, since it 
describes offline work.



Such info should contain tips and tricks what to do and what not, for
example never change id's or hid's or hrefs. Today it took me 2 hours to
fix many of these mistakes in a new prepared sdf file. The errors are in
the po files and we should try to minimize such problems.


These are definitely Tips for translators, so let's just move the 
section to the wiki and complete it (actually, point 4 already gives 
some information on this).


Regards,
  Andrea.


Re: [Release candicate] mwiki, test

2012-12-20 Thread TJ Frazier

On 12/20/2012 16:44, janI wrote:

Can anybody give me a link to a couple of pages with intensive math ??

I have math running in my local version, when I search for math I get 1
hit, and that page displays ok.

thx in advance
jan

http://wikitest.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Reference/Math_commands 
has many but very simple math commands. All seem to be working fine.


My user page has one example. It's working fine.

With the removal of the F*CK editor, the preview before first edit 
preference now works fine. Very glad to have that back.


/tj/





I broke the windows build :(

2012-12-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hmm..

It looks like my recent update of libxml2 broke the build in Windows.

Before reverting, anyone has details of the breakage? The buildbot is not 
especific at all.

Thanks and sorry,

Pedro.

Re: I broke the windows build :(

2012-12-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
I found it.. it's an upstream bug.

I will fix it in half an hour or so.

cheers,

Pedro.




 Da: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
A: dev@openoffice.apache.org 
Inviato: Venerdì 21 Dicembre 2012 0:29
Oggetto: I broke the windows build :(
 
Hmm..

It looks like my recent update of libxml2 broke the build in Windows.

Before reverting, anyone has details of the breakage? The buildbot is not 
especific at all.

Thanks and sorry,

Pedro.



Re: Is support for legacy file formats saved?

2012-12-20 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 12/20/12 8:17 PM, Ralf Lehmeier wrote:
 Hello!
 LO has removed all files with the 4.0 up to and including StarOffice 5.2
 support.
 LO 4.0 with the old files can no longer work.
 What is the plan in AOO? Will there be support for this in the future too?
 

no, we plan to drop these old formats as well. This was planned since a
long time for OpenOffice and even long before go-oo was renamed in LO.

The reason is a technical one, the filter code have to be maintained in
a special library and it is always a lot of work, especially when you
want to do some core changes.

The usage of the old formats is rather seldom and you can use any
OpenOffice version  4.0 to convert any of these files in a newer format
which is recommended anyway.

Juergen



A Small Quest, and Merry Christmas!

2012-12-20 Thread imacat
Dear all,

Here is a small quest for you.  You need to be on Linux with mplayer
installed.  (It would still be OK if not, but you won't be hearing
anything.)

http://people.apache.org/~imacat/piano-quest-20121221.zip

And, Merry Christmas! ^_*'

-- 
Best regards,
imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc

Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature