Re: [digitalradio] Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
Mark Thompson wrote: *Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies* Of course, the problem with Winlink is that since Winlink stations do not, as a matter of policy, listen before transmitting, there is a grave risk that a Winlink station will interfere with other emergency traffic. Other forms of emergency communication (the main ones, i.e. stations manned by human beings) do not have this flaw, because they listen before transmitting as required by the laws of essentially all countries. de Roger W6VZV
[digitalradio] Digital mode contest : North American High Speed Meteor Scatter 2007 Gemenids Test
North American High Speed Meteor Scatter 2007 Gemenids Test Sponsor: WSJT Group groups.yahoo.com/group/wsjtgroup/ Contest period: UTC Dec 13 to 0200 UTC Dec 17, 2007. The test period has been chosen to coincide with the Geminids meteor shower. More information on this shower can be found here. Bands: 50, 144, 222, and 432 MHz. Rules and scoring: QSOs can be made using any mode provided they are entirely by meteor scatter. No QSOs within own maidenhead grid square or any of the 8 adjacent grid squares. Exchange is both callsigns, 4 character maidenhead grid squares, and final `Rogers'. Output power up to the legal limit on any band. Use of self-spotting and scheduling (eg. Pingjockey website) before and during the event are allowed. Random QSOs completed without the use of any scheduling aids or self-spotting will score double points. Detailed procedures for random operation can be found here. All operators are reminded that exchanging information without the use of meteor scatter during the QSO attempt invalidates the contact. The scoring is as follows: BandPoints Random Points 50 1 2 144 2 4 222 4 8 432 8 16 Total score is QSO points times number of unique grid squares worked per band (standard VHF contest scoring). An operator is free to attempt both scheduled and random QSOs. If a random QSO is made with a station that has already been worked with a schedule, replace with appropriate random points. Example: K1JT works W8WN on 50 MHz after scheduling on Pingjockey. The QSO is scored with 1 point. Later in the event, these stations work randomly. The QSO is now scored with 2 points. An example of self-spotting is a Pingjockey post `CQ east on 144.140'. QSOs that result from making or reading such a posting cannot be scored as random. Monitoring Pingjockey activity violates the spirit of random operation. Rovers: QSO points x (Unique grid squares worked per band + Number of grids from which at least 1 QSO was completed). This is the standard rover scoring formula for VHF contests. Rovers making QSOs from their home station must submit a separate log for those contacts. Awards: Certificates will be mailed to the high scorers in each of the four North American time zones. Awards will also be given to top scoring Random-Only operators and Rovers in each time zone. A Random-Only operator is expected to refrain from any self-spotting and/or scheduling before and during the contest. Log submission: Participants should submit: 1) A summary and 2) A log. 1) The summary should include: i) Your call; ii) Your time zone; iii) Category: Regular, Random-Only, or Rover; iv) QSOs per band; and vi) Final claimed score. Please show the arithmetic you use to obtain your final score, ie. QSO points x Multipliers = Final Score. 2) For each QSO, the log must show: i) Date, ii) Time (UTC), iii) Callsign of station worked, iv) Grid, v) Band (50, 144, etc), and vi) QSO points. This information will be used to cross-check with other logs for scoring accuracy. Submission of the log as an Excel spreadsheet (arrange the columns as shown above) is strongly encouraged, although any convenient log submission format is acceptable. OpenOffice Calc is an excellent free program that almost perfectly mimics Excel. It can be downloaded here. Logs should be emailed by January 17, 2008 to Mike WB2FKO ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Contest coordinators: Tip (WA5UFH); John (N6ENU); Mike (WB2FKO) -- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ)
Re: [digitalradio] Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
It can also clog up our bands. For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250 Do we really need 262Kb emails like this on HF - Original Message - From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 4:45 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies Mark Thompson wrote: *Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies* Of course, the problem with Winlink is that since Winlink stations do not, as a matter of policy, listen before transmitting, there is a grave risk that a Winlink station will interfere with other emergency traffic. Other forms of emergency communication (the main ones, i.e. stations manned by human beings) do not have this flaw, because they listen before transmitting as required by the laws of essentially all countries. de Roger W6VZV
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
Could you set up an automatic archive of these PACTOR transmissions, like the various ones that exist for SSTV? Leigh/WA5ZNU --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250
Re: [digitalradio] Re: FDMDV confusion
Thanks I did get the wright program this time, will be looking for some signals to make sure that the rec is working, but I will have some more question about this program. Thankx Russell NC5O --- nj2e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Russell Blair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is FDMDV the same as DRMDV and if not where can I find FDMDV program. I have melp_1400.dll and melp_dll.dll, but the program I download was DRMDV. Thanks Russell NC5O --- w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Russell, It is not the same mode More like WinDRM. You can find it at http://n1su.com/fdmdv/ 73s Don NJ2E = IN GOD WE TRUST ! = Russell Blair NC5O Hell Field #300 DRCC #55 Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
[digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It can also clog up our bands. For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250 Do we really need 262Kb emails like this on HF That's an interesting observation. Maybe you could keep some statistics on message lengths - it seems like Winlink ought to have a severe limit on message length. And then forwarded do-gooder emails are the bane of regular email as well as radio-forwarded mail. When I see FW in the subject like of a message I almost always delete it without reading. The few exceptions are when the rest of the subject line shows it is something related to a current topic that I am interested in. There is a book United States Army in Vietnam, Military communications, a test for technology. It is very dry reading, being official history, yet it gives some insights into why the U.S. was losing the war. There is a passage about someone sending a message with Operational Immediate precedence, which means it blocked all messages of lower precedence, and it was so long it took 8 hours of operator time to punch into tape before it started transmitting. Then took several hours to transmit.
[digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It can also clog up our bands. For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250 Do we really need 262Kb emails like this on HF Well, Do we really need contests, ragchewing, voice qsos, voice nets, cw qsos, cw nets, on HF? Realy it all depends on what each individual wants to do! Your millage might vary! It's a hobby OM! Each guys pleasure might be someone else's discomfort, but when an emergency arises then I think that everyone else's hobby needs must back off for a while until the emergency is over. I think this is fair! When human lives are in danger then everything else should be of a lower priority. 73 de Demetre SV1UY
[digitalradio] Re: New Digital Voice Mode FDMDV
Olá Cesco ! O Arnaldo PY4BL, fez um ótimo contato hoje em FDMDV com IZ2GAF Doriano, com boa qualidade de audio em ambas as estações, em 14236kHz as 20:53Z ! Ele está mandando os parabéns e um abraço para você ! Tenho uma outra sugestão: para mudar mais facilmente a tela display, seria interessante você acrescentar em Settings, Sound, About a opção View, onde seriam colocadas as opções de Display (Waterfall, etc...) 73 de Roland. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, cesco12342000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Roland, Parabéns pelo FDMDV ! Obrigado. Muito feliz de ver seu mail ! Tenho uma sugestão: Seria melhor se a frequencia de transmissão fosse FIXA, A nova versao vai ter uma opcao a de voltar ao centro da banda. Tambem concertei o auto-tune. 73, Cesco, HB9TLK
RE: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
If you are monitoring a Pactor transmission, or preserving same for archival purposes, it must be FEC. My understanding is that all Winlink 2000 transmissions are Pactor ARQ. Methinks something stinks here:) David KD4NUE -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leigh L Klotz, Jr. Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 5:42 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies Could you set up an automatic archive of these PACTOR transmissions, like the various ones that exist for SSTV? Leigh/WA5ZNU --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250
Re: [digitalradio] Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
Some will never ending complain about anything and everything. Bottom line - it worked and very well.
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
You wrote: it must be FEC. My understanding is that all Winlink 2000 transmissions are Pactor ARQ. Methinks something stinks here:) Well I assure you it doesn't stink! There are many programs which will monitor Pactor ARQ. For instance MultiPSK, Digipan, MixW. 73 Sholto KE7HPV. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 2:55 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
[digitalradio] The PSK DeathMatch Digital Duel
The PSK DeathMatch Digital Duel Presented By The Michigan DX Association The Friendly 48 Hour International PSK Digital Duel 2007 Saturday Dec 15th 00:00Z through Sunday Dec 16th 24:00Z The PSK DeathMatch Rules Presented By The Michigan DX Association and our Contest Sponsors Exchange:Name-State/Provice/Country-DX Stations send DXCC Country Prefix..Note:Contesters are NOT interested in your Equipment Or Your Weather! Please refrain from including non essential information in your macros! Why a 48 hour Digital Duel? This is a DeathMatch,it is not designed to be a walk in the park and it is held only once a year! Only the strong will survive.You may take all the breaks you want but your totals will suffer.Just do your best within the 48 hours and see if you have the right stuff! Good luck and fire up those interfaces.The PSK DeathMatch Sword and Daggers wait for you if you are up to our world wide digital duel challenge! Bands: Operate The Standard PSK freqs. On 160,80,40,20,15,10 6 mtrs..No WARC Bands May Be Used In This Or Any Contest! No Class Splitting Please. Rules: : Single Operator And Single Transmitter. PSK 31PSK 63 Submit your Scores(By E-Mail)No Snail Mail Class 1.2.3. Class 1 50 Watts Max Submitting stations must be DX outside of the USA . Class 2-50 Watts Max from any location. Class 3 --- Qrp 5 Watts Max(QRP means your station not the other guys) Remember..You MUST enter within only *One* of the above Classes,No Class Mixing! If you do not mention your class when submitting,we will have to contact you. Multipliers 2007 Multipliers =States/Provinces/ and Countries Mults Good On PSK 31 [And] PSK 63 Once Per Band No Dupes Permited On Same Band Unless New Contact Via PSK 63 All Stations can be worked [once] per Band and PSK Mode for Points Points System 1 Point each standard contact. 2 points Each Contact made from your QRP station 3 Points Each Contact on 6 Meters Note:-Bonus Points have been discontinued in favor of our 2 new Dagger Awards.This is an even better bonus!!! Yes,Swords cost a good deal more than paper certificates but we think it's worth the added cost! Click Above To View Winners PSK DeathMatch Sponsors Thank's to our contest sponsors! Bela W. Lindenfeld, N8SHZ For The Stephen Edward Lindenfeld,N8XSH/SK Memorial Chuck LeMar,W8VOM Class II Sword Sponsor.Michigan DX Association Class III Sponsor See you in December. Visit Our Sponsor Links On This Page Today! Click Above To View Photos Of PSK DeathMatch Swords! Scoring: Scoring is simple,Contact points X Multipliers for final Grand Total Score! Remember..No Class Mixing..All Contacts Must Be Within The Class You Submit In.Example:You submit in Class 3 QRP so all of your Q's must be made at 5W or less not some at 5W and others at 50W. Please be honest with your scores,we reserve the right to request your logs!Refusal to comply with this request in a timely fassion may result in disqualification. Awards This is a DeathMatch,Top score takes the DeathMatch Sword! First Place Winners in the (remaining) classes will receive Class Swords. Officers of the MDXA using our club call W8DXI are not eligible! Enter Here: E-MAIL Your Scores To Chuck LeMar W8VOM Include Your Class - Total Score And Brief Summary TO SUBMIT YOUR 2007 SCORES JUST CLICK ENTER BELOW! Deadline for all submissions is 01/20/08 DX winners must pre pay shipping for their awards or accept a post paid certificate! Shipping Swords to DX often costs more than the award itself. -- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ)
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
Demetre SV1UY wrote: Well, Do we really need contests, ragchewing, voice qsos, voice nets, cw qsos, cw nets, on HF? Realy it all depends on what each individual wants to do! Your millage might vary! It's a hobby OM! Each guys pleasure might be someone else's discomfort, but when an emergency arises then I think that everyone else's hobby needs must back off for a while until the emergency is over. I think this is fair! When human lives are in danger then everything else should be of a lower priority. 73 de Demetre SV1UY The contests, ragchewing, qsos, nets, etc. that you reference ARE ham radio. Sending internet emails over the air to no purpose whatever, without even listening to see if the channel is clear, is NOT ham radio. It is abuse, which is what Winlink mostly is. de Roger W6VZV
Re: [digitalradio] Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
John Becker, WØJAB wrote: Some will never ending complain about anything and everything. Bottom line - it worked and very well. Actually, I doubt that Winlink did much of anything. The original post read a lot more like a PR effort by people with an agenda than anything of substance. I've done disaster communications in fires, earthquakes, and drills, and Winlink never amounted to anything. I doubt that has changed. de Roger W6VZV
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
Correction: it was Pactor 1 ARQ I was monitoring and yes, it was Winlink. 73 Sholto KE7HPV - Original Message - From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies I am confused. Sholto said it was Pactor 2, not Pactor 3. I don't know that Winlink is involved at all. But there is so much mystery about these modes, and it seems like an archive would be a good idea. I set up one for SSTV but got tired of deleting the unseemly images, but others have set up really nice ones. 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 3:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you are monitoring a Pactor transmission, or preserving same for archival purposes, it must be FEC. My understanding is that all Winlink 2000 transmissions are Pactor ARQ. Methinks something stinks here:) David KD4NUE -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leigh L Klotz, Jr. Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 5:42 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies Could you set up an automatic archive of these PACTOR transmissions, like the various ones that exist for SSTV? Leigh/WA5ZNU --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php View the DRCC numbers database at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [digitalradio] Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
Sholto Fisher wrote: It can also clog up our bands. For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250 Do we really need 262Kb emails like this on HF No, what we need is FCC enforcement to prevent this sort of abuse. de Roger W6VZV
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
I am confused. Sholto said it was Pactor 2, not Pactor 3. I don't know that Winlink is involved at all. But there is so much mystery about these modes, and it seems like an archive would be a good idea. I set up one for SSTV but got tired of deleting the unseemly images, but others have set up really nice ones. 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 3:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you are monitoring a Pactor transmission, or preserving same for archival purposes, it must be FEC. My understanding is that all Winlink 2000 transmissions are Pactor ARQ. Methinks something stinks here:) David KD4NUE -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leigh L Klotz, Jr. Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 5:42 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies Could you set up an automatic archive of these PACTOR transmissions, like the various ones that exist for SSTV? Leigh/WA5ZNU --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php View the DRCC numbers database at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database Yahoo! Groups Links
RE: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
Then it was non B2F, and that makes it possible the message was attempted, however, buffer overrun would have stopped it's transmission long before it got to 50K mark. Pactor I cannot handle the B2F Compression used within the WinLink 2000 system with Airmail as the host, except for small text-only messaging. Pactor III and ARQ would take a large capability for processing and a CPU that was capable of true multiprocessing using a compliant operating system to decode, as proven back in 2005 when this argument originally surfaced. It should be in Snopes by now. David KD4NUE -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sholto Fisher Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:05 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies Correction: it was Pactor 1 ARQ I was monitoring and yes, it was Winlink. 73 Sholto KE7HPV - Original Message - From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:leigh%40wa5znu.org org To: digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies I am confused. Sholto said it was Pactor 2, not Pactor 3. I don't know that Winlink is involved at all. But there is so much mystery about these modes, and it seems like an archive would be a good idea. I set up one for SSTV but got tired of deleting the unseemly images, but others have set up really nice ones. 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 3:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:dalite01%40bellsouth.net net wrote: If you are monitoring a Pactor transmission, or preserving same for archival purposes, it must be FEC. My understanding is that all Winlink 2000 transmissions are Pactor ARQ. Methinks something stinks here:) David KD4NUE -Original Message- From: digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Leigh L Klotz, Jr. Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 5:42 PM To: digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies Could you set up an automatic archive of these PACTOR transmissions, like the various ones that exist for SSTV? Leigh/WA5ZNU --- In digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensw http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php eb.com/drsked/drsked.php View the DRCC numbers database at http://groups. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies
David, If it was using Pactor 2 would Winlink accept the message/attachments? or is the 50K limit applicable here also? 73 Sholto KE7HVP - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 5:47 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies Then it was non B2F, and that makes it possible the message was attempted, however, buffer overrun would have stopped it's transmission long before it got to 50K mark. Pactor I cannot handle the B2F Compression used within the WinLink 2000 system with Airmail as the host, except for small text-only messaging. Pactor III and ARQ would take a large capability for processing and a CPU that was capable of true multiprocessing using a compliant operating system to decode, as proven back in 2005 when this argument originally surfaced. It should be in Snopes by now. David KD4NUE -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sholto Fisher Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:05 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies Correction: it was Pactor 1 ARQ I was monitoring and yes, it was Winlink. 73 Sholto KE7HPV - Original Message - From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:leigh%40wa5znu.org org To: digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies I am confused. Sholto said it was Pactor 2, not Pactor 3. I don't know that Winlink is involved at all. But there is so much mystery about these modes, and it seems like an archive would be a good idea. I set up one for SSTV but got tired of deleting the unseemly images, but others have set up really nice ones. 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 3:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:dalite01%40bellsouth.net net wrote: If you are monitoring a Pactor transmission, or preserving same for archival purposes, it must be FEC. My understanding is that all Winlink 2000 transmissions are Pactor ARQ. Methinks something stinks here:) David KD4NUE -Original Message- From: digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Leigh L Klotz, Jr. Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 5:42 PM To: digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink Can Be Reliable in Emergencies Could you set up an automatic archive of these PACTOR transmissions, like the various ones that exist for SSTV? Leigh/WA5ZNU --- In digitalradio@ mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has been on going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go through is titled: FW: Please read til the end-Why boys need parents...269250 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensw http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php eb.com/drsked/drsked.php View the DRCC numbers database at http://groups. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database Yahoo! Groups Links
