Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal

2008-09-18 Thread Leskep
Maybe you should look at it like this
EasyPal only transmits the FILE (ANY TYPE OF FILE) but it is a program function
that decodes the file when received correctly and then  displays it as a 
picture - or 
text or whatever 

Les VK2DSG

From: Rui Manuel 
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 9:41 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John B. Stephensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I was assuming that people use EasyPal in the phone/image portions
of the HF bands as it is marketed as an SSTV program. 
 
 73,
 
 John
 KD6OZH
 
Ok John as a wide mode it should only be use in the phone part of the
bands, no questions about that. 

In SSB mode I am tented to classify it also as J2C but the 2
classifier, says that it as only one modulated subcarrier, and it as
several subcarries. 
The C symbol nominates it as picture. 
Could it be J7C or even J8C for several carriers ?

So a SSB signal using this program and sending a picture could be
classify as

J = SSB
8 = analog and digital in the same emission and several carriers.
C = picture 

An SSB signal using this program and transmitting a txt file could be
classified as

J = SSB
8 = analog and digital in the same emission and several carriers.
D = Data transmission

I must say that I am using the program in 14.233/236 with very good
results, so I am not the better judge.
My intention is to ask permission to use it in the digital part of the
2m band, so I must have a classification for it.
Here we can't do Analog SSTV in the 2m Band, only Fax. 
My intention is to ask permission for 12K5F8D or 12K5F8C who knows?

I must see the 2 extra designators also.

Rui CT1QK



 

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal

2008-09-18 Thread Leskep
I think it would be more correct to say that it is file transfer program -

not an SSTV  program - 
depending on the type of file sent it will
either display it as a picture - if indeed it is some type of picture file -
or save it if it is a data file - or display it as a .txt file if it is a text 
file
and even display it in the waterfall if it is a .wav file - or even send it as 
a .eml file
providing it is going to a station that is set up as an email server

Les VK2DSG


From: John B. Stephensen 
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 6:41 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal



I was assuming that people use EasyPal in the phone/image portions of the HF 
bands as it is marketed as an SSTV program.  

73,

John
KD6OZH

  - Original Message - 
  From: Rick W 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 18:52 UTC
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal


  Hi John,

  While the EasyPal program is primarily used on HF for image 
  transmission, since it can send data in most any form, the Third Symbol 
  does matter here in the U.S. since you can not send image (fax) in the 
  RTTY/Data portions of the bands unless 500 Hz or narrower and EasyPal is 
  closer to a phone bandwidth in size. Many countries have no specific 
  rules like we have and while it is true that there are a number of 
  scofflaw hams, the better way to handle this is to change the rules 
  rather than violate them. Or at the very least, have a bureaucratic 
  interpretation which then effectively has the force of law unless 
  overridden by higher authority.

  The land mobile services do not follow Part 97 rules so these rules do 
  not apply to radio amateurs. If the FCC ignores certain rules (and they 
  clearly do, based on what can only be described as stonewalling on some 
  of these issues for quite some time), then it is difficult for them to 
  argue when any rules are not followed. Not a good thing in my view and 
  hopefully the view of most law abiding hams. But just because most of us 
  follow the rules, (or try to t the best of our abilities), does not 
  necessarily mean we agree with them. Unfortunately, the majority of U.S. 
  hams do not support changes to these rules:(

  My preference would be getting the FCC to agree that any files that 
  could be sent by a program such as EasyPal would then be legal to use in 
  the Phone/Image portions of the bands. I suppose sending a petition 
  would be one way since they do not respond to those of us who have asked 
  for an interpretation. I am guessing that they are betting that no one 
  will petition them, which would be a 100 times more paperwork for them 
  than just responding to a request. Otherwise, you would think that they 
  would respond, as best they can, to avoid a petition. I would like to 
  see it decided one way or the other.

  73,

  Rick, KV9U

  John B. Stephensen wrote:
   EasyPal uses DRM so there are multiple subcarriers and its facsimile 
   as it displays an image on the screen so J2C seems appropriate. The 
   FCC definition of facsimile allows the image to be stored in a file 
   before or after transmission without affecting the emission 
   designator. If it is used to transmit a file that it can't display 
   then the third symbol might have to change to D but the FCC probably 
   doesn't care at this point as it allows data in broadcast TV 
   transmissions and RTTY mixed with voice transmissions in the land 
   mobile radio service.
   
   73,
   
   John
   KD6OZH




 

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal

2008-09-18 Thread John B. Stephensen
7, 8 and 9 indicate multiple channels. In the U.S., 2 has been interpreted to 
include multiple subcarriers but only one channel.

73,

John
KD6OZH

  - Original Message - 
  From: Rui Manuel 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 23:41 UTC
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal


  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John B. Stephensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  
   I was assuming that people use EasyPal in the phone/image portions
  of the HF bands as it is marketed as an SSTV program. 
   
   73,
   
   John
   KD6OZH
   
  Ok John as a wide mode it should only be use in the phone part of the
  bands, no questions about that. 

  In SSB mode I am tented to classify it also as J2C but the 2
  classifier, says that it as only one modulated subcarrier, and it as
  several subcarries. 
  The C symbol nominates it as picture. 
  Could it be J7C or even J8C for several carriers ?

  So a SSB signal using this program and sending a picture could be
  classify as

  J = SSB
  8 = analog and digital in the same emission and several carriers.
  C = picture 

  An SSB signal using this program and transmitting a txt file could be
  classified as

  J = SSB
  8 = analog and digital in the same emission and several carriers.
  D = Data transmission

  I must say that I am using the program in 14.233/236 with very good
  results, so I am not the better judge.
  My intention is to ask permission to use it in the digital part of the
  2m band, so I must have a classification for it.
  Here we can't do Analog SSTV in the 2m Band, only Fax. 
  My intention is to ask permission for 12K5F8D or 12K5F8C who knows?

  I must see the 2 extra designators also.

  Rui CT1QK



   

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal

2008-09-18 Thread Rick W
I was thinking more about high speed data in the narrow portions of 
the bands. In the image/voice portion they allow DSB AM so it is hard to 
criticize wide digital modes, but I know a lot of hams would disagree 
with me on that. I like the technology that in some fashion works better 
than existing modes, faster, bandwidth conserving, better quality, etc. 
The text and image digital modes have made large improvements in the 
past few years.

73,

Rick, KV9U


John B. Stephensen wrote:
 Digital voice fits in 1.2 kHz and digital image can fit in 1.2 kHz so 
 why not do both simultaneously on HF?
  
 73,
  
 John
 KD6OZH
  



Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal

2008-09-17 Thread John B. Stephensen
EasyPal uses DRM so there are multiple subcarriers and its facsimile as it 
displays an image on the screen so J2C seems appropriate. The FCC definition of 
facsimile allows the image to be stored in a file before or after transmission 
without affecting the emission designator. If it is used to transmit a file 
that it can't display then the third symbol might have to change to D but the 
FCC probably doesn't care at this point as it allows data in broadcast TV 
transmissions and RTTY mixed with voice transmissions in the land mobile radio 
service.

73,

John
KD6OZH

  - Original Message - 
  From: Rui Manuel 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:23 UTC
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal


  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Looking at the mode as a QAM constellation with several speeds, if
  using 
   an SSB transmitter and sending an image (fax) and excluding the 
   bandwidth part, for HF using an SSB suppressed carrier with a quantized 
   or digital signal with sub carrier and sending facsimile it would
  likely 
   be J2C?
   
   And for VHF, and I assume you mean FM, which gives the much larger 
   bandwidth, FM angle modulation sending a quantized or digital signal 
   with sub carrier and sending facsimile or F2C? Or with a phase
  modulator 
   using the G symbol as you suggest?
   
   If sending Data instead of image, then the third symbol changes from C 
   (fax) to D (data) except that I am not sure if F2D is considered to be 
   Data here in the U.S. as it does not seem to be listed as one of the
  FCC 
   approved ITU emission classifications for data.
   
   The multi-channel second symbol selection of 7 may only be for much
  more 
   complicated multi streams not normally used on amateur equipment.
   
   Maybe others have more knowledge of this?
   
   73,
   
   Rick, KV9U
   

  Thank you for the reply Rick

  It is not easy don't you think? What puzzle me are the several data
  carriers that I see on the waterfall.

  Not considering the bandwidth we can omit the first part

  For the first could be anything (type of modulation of the main
  carrier) like J, F, G, or even in special cases M, K and Q.

  Now the hard part, the second numeral. (nature of signal(s) modulating
  the main carrier)

  No modulating signal 0 
  FALSE
  A single channel containing quantized or digital information without
  the use of a modulating sub-carrier 1
  FALSE
  A single channel containing quantized or digital information with the
  use of a modulating sub-carrier 2
  MAYBE
  A single channel containing analogue information 3
  FALSE
  Two or more channels containing quantized or digital information 7
  DON'T KNOW
  Two or more channels containing analogue information 8
  FALSE
  Composite system with one or more channels containing quantized or
  digital information, together with one or more channels containing
  analogue information 8
  MAY BE (because we are also using the waterfall pictures in analog,
  and files in digital)

  Now the third letter (type of information to be transmitted)

  No information transmitted N
  FALSE
  Telegraphy - for aural reception A
  FALSE
  Telegraphy - for automatic reception B
  FALSE
  Facsimile C
  FALSE we are transmitting files (wav,txt,and so on)
  Data transmission, telemetry, telecommand D
  MAY BE
  Telephony (including sound broadcasting) E
  FALSE
  Television (video) F
  FALSE
  Combination of the above W
  FALSE

  This is only for the first 3 letters missing the others two letters
  for additional information

  Any help or comments ??

  Rui, CT1QK



   

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal

2008-09-17 Thread Rick W
Hi John,

While the EasyPal program is primarily used on HF for image 
transmission, since it can send data in most any form, the Third Symbol 
does matter here in the U.S. since you can not send image (fax) in the 
RTTY/Data portions of the bands unless 500 Hz or narrower and EasyPal is 
closer to a phone bandwidth in size. Many countries have no specific 
rules like we have and while it is true that there are a number of 
scofflaw hams, the better way to handle this is to change the rules 
rather than violate them. Or at the very least, have a bureaucratic 
interpretation which then effectively has the force of law unless 
overridden by higher authority.

The land mobile services do not follow Part 97 rules so these rules do 
not apply to radio amateurs. If the FCC ignores certain rules (and they 
clearly do, based on what can only be described as stonewalling on some 
of these issues for quite some time), then it is difficult for them to 
argue when any rules are not followed. Not a good thing in my view and 
hopefully the view of most law abiding hams. But just because most of us 
follow the rules, (or try to t the best of our abilities), does not 
necessarily mean we agree with them. Unfortunately, the majority of U.S. 
hams do not support changes to these rules:(

My preference would be getting the FCC to agree that any files that 
could be sent by a program such as EasyPal would then be legal to use in 
the Phone/Image portions of the bands. I suppose sending a petition 
would be one way since they do not respond to those of us who have asked 
for an interpretation. I am guessing that they are betting that no one 
will petition them, which would be a 100 times more paperwork for them 
than just responding to a request. Otherwise, you would think that they 
would respond, as best they can, to avoid a petition. I would like to 
see it decided one way or the other.

73,

Rick, KV9U


John B. Stephensen wrote:
 EasyPal uses DRM so there are multiple subcarriers and its facsimile 
 as it displays an image on the screen so J2C seems appropriate. The 
 FCC definition of facsimile allows the image to be stored in a file 
 before or after transmission without affecting the emission 
 designator. If it is used to transmit a file that it can't display 
 then the third symbol might have to change to D but the FCC probably 
 doesn't care at this point as it allows data in broadcast TV 
 transmissions and RTTY mixed with voice transmissions in the land 
 mobile radio service.
  
 73,
  
 John
 KD6OZH



Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal

2008-09-17 Thread John B. Stephensen
I was assuming that people use EasyPal in the phone/image portions of the HF 
bands as it is marketed as an SSTV program.  

73,

John
KD6OZH

  - Original Message - 
  From: Rick W 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 18:52 UTC
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emision designators for EasyPal


  Hi John,

  While the EasyPal program is primarily used on HF for image 
  transmission, since it can send data in most any form, the Third Symbol 
  does matter here in the U.S. since you can not send image (fax) in the 
  RTTY/Data portions of the bands unless 500 Hz or narrower and EasyPal is 
  closer to a phone bandwidth in size. Many countries have no specific 
  rules like we have and while it is true that there are a number of 
  scofflaw hams, the better way to handle this is to change the rules 
  rather than violate them. Or at the very least, have a bureaucratic 
  interpretation which then effectively has the force of law unless 
  overridden by higher authority.

  The land mobile services do not follow Part 97 rules so these rules do 
  not apply to radio amateurs. If the FCC ignores certain rules (and they 
  clearly do, based on what can only be described as stonewalling on some 
  of these issues for quite some time), then it is difficult for them to 
  argue when any rules are not followed. Not a good thing in my view and 
  hopefully the view of most law abiding hams. But just because most of us 
  follow the rules, (or try to t the best of our abilities), does not 
  necessarily mean we agree with them. Unfortunately, the majority of U.S. 
  hams do not support changes to these rules:(

  My preference would be getting the FCC to agree that any files that 
  could be sent by a program such as EasyPal would then be legal to use in 
  the Phone/Image portions of the bands. I suppose sending a petition 
  would be one way since they do not respond to those of us who have asked 
  for an interpretation. I am guessing that they are betting that no one 
  will petition them, which would be a 100 times more paperwork for them 
  than just responding to a request. Otherwise, you would think that they 
  would respond, as best they can, to avoid a petition. I would like to 
  see it decided one way or the other.

  73,

  Rick, KV9U

  John B. Stephensen wrote:
   EasyPal uses DRM so there are multiple subcarriers and its facsimile 
   as it displays an image on the screen so J2C seems appropriate. The 
   FCC definition of facsimile allows the image to be stored in a file 
   before or after transmission without affecting the emission 
   designator. If it is used to transmit a file that it can't display 
   then the third symbol might have to change to D but the FCC probably 
   doesn't care at this point as it allows data in broadcast TV 
   transmissions and RTTY mixed with voice transmissions in the land 
   mobile radio service.
   
   73,
   
   John
   KD6OZH