Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first...

2011-06-30 Thread Tony Estep

 On 6/30/2011 7:37 AM, William Ravenel wrote:
 ...Bought a paddle and decided to learn to use it with my left hand so my
 dominant right hand could take notes. I also decided to set the paddle up
 with dits on the left 

===
Very cool. As we all know (or should know), Jimi Hendrix's guitar was strung
the standard right-handed way.

Tony KT0NY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first...

2011-06-30 Thread Ross Primrose N4RP
On 6/30/2011 11:17 AM, Tony Estep wrote:

 ===
 Very cool. As we all know (or should know), Jimi Hendrix's guitar was strung
 the standard right-handed way.


No, it wasn't. He used a right-handed guitar, but it was strung in the 
standard left-handed way.

73, Ross N4RP

-- 
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum 
transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-29 Thread John Ragle
I like the keyer in the K3. Long ago, my straight key was all I had. For 
a while I used a bug, but keeping it adjusted was a nuisance. As soon 
as Heath came out with their keyer, I built one and loved it. My own 
experience is that it becomes very hard to copy fast CW if the sender is 
careless about all aspects of sending, including letter and word spaces.

LIke Ed, I too learned code from an Instructograph, and it taught me 
what properly-sent code should sound like. I am perfectly willing for 
the keyer in the rig to clean up my sending a little, and although I 
seldom stray much above 25 wpm anymore, I do like the sound of clean CW. 
Somewhere amongst my souvenirs I have an ARRL 35 wpm certificate, and I 
used a keyboard for a long time, since my typing speed is in excess of 
100 wpm. I liked the keyboard buffer...it was a little like running 
PSK...load it up and then sit back and relax. Nowdays, my 78-year old 
body would not send very good CW with a straight key, and I agree with 
those who pegged the straight key as nostalgia. For me it is a matter 
of practicality.

John Ragle -- W1ZI

=

On 6/29/2011 2:47 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote:
 I learned CW in a high school night class with one of those
 paper-tape code machines.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-29 Thread Bill W4ZV

Edward R. Cole wrote:
 
 I didn't get a paddle until a couple years ago, even though my radios 
 had internal keyers.  I am finding it hard to use the paddle.  I 
 guess too many years with a straight key where your hand makes each 
 character.  I guess in time I will get the reflexes to use an iambic 
 key.  BTW I still have my Novice straight key and send 20wpm pretty 
 easy; much better than my paddle sending.
 

Don't waste your time with iambic and get a really good single-lever paddle
like N3ZN's ZN-SL series.  The supposed efficiency advantage of iambic is
mostly a myth (see below) and the downside is you must have much more
accurate finger coordination (which becomes a problem as you age).  BTW most
competitors at the High Speed Telegraphy (HST) World Championships use
homebrew single-lever paddles to send extremely high speeds.  

73,  Bill

Iambic Keying - Debunking the Myth
http://www.morsex.com/pubs/iambicmyth.pdf

High Speed Morse Code- WØAAA (using ZN-SLB)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_icJLmsFNU

Practicing for the HST Championships
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpKv1sd69VsNR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUBGrO9Vs1kNR=1


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Straight-key-first-tp6527910p6528427.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first? (was: Re: K3 in the Media)

2011-06-29 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2011 28 Jun 23:20 -0500, Buddy Brannan wrote:
 Completely agree. To this day, I still can't send properly with an iambic 
 paddle and tend to use them as though they were single lever paddles. Even 
 though I've never owned such a beast. Really, really want another bug, 
 though. 

In late '09 I read the World of Ideas column in CQ by the late Dave
Ingram, K4TWJ, wherein he introduced the W6AME Bushwhacker single lever
paddle kit.  His statement that many ops find single lever keying easier
and more accurate than iambic intrigued me so I ordered one and received
it on a snowy Christmas Eve just before our Christmas blizzard of '09 so
I had plenty of time to play with it.  Admittedly, operating one is
deceptively simple yet takes a much different technique than iambic
paddles.  I find my accuracy has improved but still has a long way to
go!

http://www.americanmorse.com/bushwhacker.htm

It is a well-made unit, very precise, and offers a wide range of
adjustment.

I've had several straight keys from various no-name cheapies to a J-38.
Last August I picked up a tarnished key on a black krinkle finish base.
It looked neat and felt good so I paid the asking price and found out
later that it is a Nye Speed-X key.  I cleaned the nickel parts with
NEVR-DULL and it looks great on the desk and is much easier to use than
any previous key.  I bought the matching base from Morse Express which
makes for a nice key that is not too high off the desk top.

73, de Nate N0NB 

-- 

The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true.

Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-29 Thread Lou Kolb
I get exactly that same benefit from using a keyboard keyer.  Exposure to 
good code, I think, really does breed better sending.  If you're a good 
enough typist, you can, as has been mentioned, just let the buffer fill, 
(200 characters in my case) and just enjoy the music of Morse.  Lou --  
WA3MIX
- Original Message - 
From: Wayne Conrad wcon...@yagni.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?


 I'm too new to this to know much, but it seems to me that one might best
 learn to send Morse well by copying a lot of well sent Morse.  I only
 say this because I listened to computer generated Morse for months
 before I got on the air.  When I finally did send, I got compliments
 right away on my fist.  All I was doing, though, is sending the same
 rhythm I'd been hearing for months.

 If this was already said, then I apologize for the redundant repetition :)

 73, Wayne Conrad KF7QGA

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-29 Thread PTA_ABD
There is a certain value in learning to use a straight key. Requires no power 
or batteries, is immune to RF,  and passable CW can be generated with just 
about any type of contacts. I recall using gum wrappers taped to my fingers 
when I was a kid ( just fer fun).

I still have one hooked up. I don't use it often, but I find difficulty using 
paddles under QRS conditions. Sadly, so many years of using paddles makes 
tickling a bug impossible anymore... yuck!

Paul WB2ABD
K3 #129
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-29 Thread Tony Estep
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:19 AM, John Ragle tpcj1...@crocker.com wrote:

 I like the keyer in the K3


 Good point. The keyer in the K3 is excellent, but not every rig with a
built-in keyer is as good. I have an SDR radio. The accompanying computer
program contains a keyer that produces choppy, uneven dits and dahs. I
haven't dug through the source code, but I suspect that the authors used
timing loops instead of clock interrupts. It's hard to use, and when one
does use it, the code it produces is ugly. So I had to add an outboard keyer
(Ham Gadgets MK1, highly recommended). The K3 was designed by and for the CW
op.

Tony KT0NY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-29 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2011 29 Jun 08:31 -0500, Tony Estep wrote:
 So I had to add an outboard keyer (Ham Gadgets MK1, highly
 recommended). 

Agreed.  Not to take anything away from the K3's keyer, but the fact
that the MK1 has K1EL keyer command compatibility makes it useful with a
wide range of programs.  It also borrows a lot of features from the
Super CMOS 3 with better push button switches than I've been able to
source for the Super CMOS 3 kit I built years ago.

73, de Nate N0NB 

-- 

The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true.

Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-29 Thread Kevin Rock
You will easily use a straight key if you ever need to now that the rhythm  
of the code is built into your mind.
Good luck and have fun,
   Kevin.  KD5ONS


On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:14:43 -0700, Wayne Conrad wcon...@yagni.com wrote:

 I'm too new to this to know much, but it seems to me that one might best
 learn to send Morse well by copying a lot of well sent Morse.  I only
 say this because I listened to computer generated Morse for months
 before I got on the air.  When I finally did send, I got compliments
 right away on my fist.  All I was doing, though, is sending the same
 rhythm I'd been hearing for months.

 If this was already said, then I apologize for the redundant repetition  
 :)

 73, Wayne Conrad KF7QGA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-29 Thread Kevin Rock
I once had an op check into ECN who I knew but his fist sounded rather  
odd.  Spacing was good but the keying sounded flaky.  He was also slower  
than his normal speed.  After the nets he emailed me and told me his  
story.  He had been using two pieces of stranded wire to send code.  I  
think solid wire works much better ;)  Once you know code you can use any  
manner of instrument to send it.
73,
   Kevin.  KD5ONS


On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:54:28 -0700, PTA_ABD wb2...@roadrunner.com wrote:

 There is a certain value in learning to use a straight key. Requires no  
 power or batteries, is immune to RF,  and passable CW can be generated  
 with just about any type of contacts. I recall using gum wrappers taped  
 to my fingers when I was a kid ( just fer fun).

 I still have one hooked up. I don't use it often, but I find difficulty  
 using paddles under QRS conditions. Sadly, so many years of using  
 paddles makes tickling a bug impossible anymore... yuck!

 Paul WB2ABD
 K3 #129
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-29 Thread WILLIS COOKE
Wayne, congratulations!  It did not take you long to find the secret.  I still 
listen to W1AW code practice from time to time and I have only been licensed 
since 1956.  It always pays to listen to well sent code from time to time along 
with the hodge podge of good and not so good code you hear on the air.  It is 
great to be able to copy anybody and it is also great to be able to send so 
that 
anybody can copy.
 Willis 'Cookie' Cooke 
K5EWJ  Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart 





From: Wayne Conrad wcon...@yagni.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wed, June 29, 2011 12:14:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

I'm too new to this to know much, but it seems to me that one might best 
learn to send Morse well by copying a lot of well sent Morse.  I only 
say this because I listened to computer generated Morse for months 
before I got on the air.  When I finally did send, I got compliments 
right away on my fist.  All I was doing, though, is sending the same 
rhythm I'd been hearing for months.

If this was already said, then I apologize for the redundant repetition :)

73, Wayne Conrad KF7QGA

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first? (was: Re: K3 in the Media)

2011-06-29 Thread Jim Dunstan
At 06:06 PM 6/28/2011 -0700, you wrote:
The hardest CW to copy (for me anyway) has insufficient spacing between 
letters or words.
This is exactly what a keyer does NOT help you with! The operator has to 
learn to
recognize what good CW sounds like. Does sending with a straight key help 
with that?
Maybe, but I doubt it.

Many of you have heard old-timers with bugs sending with the banana-boat 
swing (dits way
too fast for the dahs) or the Lake Erie swing (think about sending from 
a rolling ship).
These are generally considered 'bad CW', but they aren't difficult to copy.

The techniques of sending with an iambic paddle, a bug and a straight key 
are very
different. I don't think learning one helps you with the others.

Hi

I worked in Commercial CW communications at the tail-end of the era in the 
50's and early 60's.
At one point while in the Arctic we communicated with 2 stations in the 
south, Winnipeg and
Ottawa.  Between the 2 stations there would be 8 to 10 different 
operators.  I could tell
immediately who was on shift by the sound of the 'fist'.  Almost all of the 
operators used a
bug (each carried his in it's own case ... like professional pool players).

A new man was immediately recognized ... and the usual response was to 
speed up hi.
Personal communications was frowned upon.  However on a night shift there 
would be
a lot of banter ... (you would think we had QSK hi)  You had to be careful 
though .. in those
days we actually had Radio Monitoring Stations.  It was possible to 
actually get a ticket for
illegal traffic hi hi.  The person giving the citation had to be a CW op as 
well and vy mean.

I agree that certain kinds of swing with faster dots than dashes makes 
copying easier.
Perfect  CW ... as generated by a computer I find becomes harder to copy 
once the
speed goes up beyond 20 WPM.

I like an electronic keyer setup to simulate a bug (old habits I guess) 
with electronic dits and
manual dashes.  I can use a squeeze type setup ... but find I have to shift 
to the bug style
in order to be more comfortable  and to get into the 'swing' of things hi.

As far as the straight key  I don't know of anyone who continued to use 
one once
they moved out of Radio School.  Strange thing though  in Radio School 
all CW reception
was recorded with pencil and paper.  The really good ops made the 
transition to the
typewriter ... since all messages must be as received ... es not 
paraphrased hi hi.

As mentioned my experience is at the tail end of the era.  Some of the old 
hands (really old hands)
talked about how they were sometime forbidden to use a bug as 
communications was considered
to be more accurate with a straight key.  Most of these experiences were 
railroad telegraphers
and marine operators .

The transmitter we used in the Arctic was a 300 watt Collins with full AM 
modulation.  It was
strictly forbidden to use AM. Although I recall using it on a few occasions 
hi hi.  (where did the
microphone come from ?)

Sorry for rambling on.  I was very fortunate to have learned CW and how to 
type (in a girls class in High School).
I don't know one CW op with Alzheimers hi hi   It is great for the grey matter.

73

Jim, VE3CI



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first? (was: Re: K3 in the Media)

2011-06-28 Thread stan levandowski
There is a product called the CW Machine invented by Ulrich Steinberg 
N2DE/DJ8GO and marketed by Begali which has vast capabilities beyond a 
standard keyer.  One of the things it can do is analyze one's keying and 
provide feedback regarding spacing, etc.  It appears to be a fabulous 
investment for the dedicated CW OP who is serious about mastering the 
art. Works with paddles, straight keys, bugs, 'swipers.   Price seems 
reasonable by today's standards.  Number of reviews at eHam are 
sufficiently high to lend creedance to the 5/5 rating it has achieved. 
More info available at www.i2rtf.com for interested listers.

I have never seen one, much less operated one, but I was sufficiently 
intrigued by its potential that I purchased one.  I take delivery on 
Thursday afternoon.  The fellow who invented it is coming over to my 
shack to hook it up and get me started.

I operate 100% CW.  Paddles are wonderful--everyone sounds the same. 
And everyone makes the same mistakes.  Straight keys are nostalgic, 
perhaps, but still worthy of learning to operate properly if no reason 
other than that 'they exist and they are part of our heritage'. 
Sideswipers are the least used and least understood of the keys but 
nonetheless worthy of the effort required to learn for the same reasons 
as previously mentioned.  The bug is my favorite key because it's really 
difficult to do it correctly.   I'm still trying to improve my dit to 
dah transitions after 51 years.  I am hopeful that the CW Machine will 
help me achieve my personal goal of achieving the best 'fist' I can with 
each of the tools of the trade.

That's the nice thing about ham radio -- so very many little niches to 
explore.


73, Stan WB2LQF
KX1 #2411K1#2994K2# 6980K3#5244 K9 #1 (Cocoa the 
Chihuahua)
Everything is QRP, even the dog.


On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Vic K2VCO wrote:

 The hardest CW to copy (for me anyway) has insufficient spacing 
 between letters or words. This is exactly what a keyer does NOT help 
 you with! The operator has to learn to recognize what good CW sounds 
 like.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first? (was: Re: K3 in the Media)

2011-06-28 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
The banana boat swing is a combination of pure laziness and the
limitations of many Vibroplex bugs. Vibroplex made many, many bugs with
thick springs that prevent their dit rates being slowed below 35 wpm or so.
So QRSing below that speed (most marine communications occurred between 15
and 20 wpm with some operators I knew working a 10 wpm or less) meant
machine-gun dits with very long dahs and spaces.

I had a buddy who came ashore and worked at KPH on the California coast for
years with one of those bugs. To tame it (he as a stickler for good CW) he
hung a huge cable clamp on the pendulum so he could easily run at 15 to 20
wpm - what nearly everyone used in that service. 

I have that bug now. His widow gave it to me when he became an SK. And I
have the cable clamp. It works great, but I can't understand why his right
arm didn't look like Popeye's after using it for years, Hi! 

I like to practice on my bug with a computer decoder that is very, very
finicky about spacing and element lengths. CW GET is one such program that
really hates to decode anything but keyboard sending. My goal is to make it
decode my bug fist reliably. 

I used an iambic keyer for years and it was sweet, but it completely ruined
my fist on a bug so I put the keyer away. 

Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-

The hardest CW to copy (for me anyway) has insufficient spacing between
letters or words. 
This is exactly what a keyer does NOT help you with! The operator has to
learn to 
recognize what good CW sounds like. Does sending with a straight key help
with that? 
Maybe, but I doubt it.

Many of you have heard old-timers with bugs sending with the banana-boat
swing (dits way 
too fast for the dahs) or the Lake Erie swing (think about sending from a
rolling ship). 
These are generally considered 'bad CW', but they aren't difficult to copy.

The techniques of sending with an iambic paddle, a bug and a straight key
are very 
different. I don't think learning one helps you with the others.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first? (was: Re: K3 in the Media)

2011-06-28 Thread Kevin Rock
The decoder on the K3 can be used to monitor one's sending.  Getting the  
word spaces correct can be checked with it.  However, thinking, copying,  
and sending simultaneously with the slight delay inherent in the decoder  
is like juggling five balls at once.  It can be done but it makes life  
more interesting :)
Kevin.  KD5ONS




On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:54:25 -0700, Ron D'Eau Claire r...@cobi.biz wrote:

...

 I like to practice on my bug with a computer decoder that is very, very
 finicky about spacing and element lengths. CW GET is one such program  
 that
 really hates to decode anything but keyboard sending. My goal is to make  
 it
 decode my bug fist reliably.

...

 Ron AC7AC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first? (was: Re: K3 in the Media)

2011-06-28 Thread Buddy Brannan
On Jun 28, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Vic K2VCO wrote:

 The hardest CW to copy (for me anyway) has insufficient spacing between 
 letters or words. 
 This is exactly what a keyer does NOT help you with! The operator has to 
 learn to 
 recognize what good CW sounds like. Does sending with a straight key help 
 with that? 
 Maybe, but I doubt it.

Nah, not with that. I think sending with a straight key does help with getting 
a feel for how characters are structured, though. Not a bad thing, but like 
others here, I'd much rather have interested cw ops than insisting on straight 
keys all the way. On the other hand (am I an octopus?), an op who handles a 
straight key well is a real joy to work. Ditto for a well-handled bug. I'd love 
to be able to use both well myself; straight key fist is a bit rusty, not what 
it once was, but it's coming back, and I'm having a lot of fun with it. I 
expect I'm more critical of my sending than some might be of it, though.
 
 Many of you have heard old-timers with bugs sending with the banana-boat 
 swing (dits way 
 too fast for the dahs) or the Lake Erie swing (think about sending from a 
 rolling ship). 
 These are generally considered 'bad CW', but they aren't difficult to copy.

Unless the spacing is off, then, well, all bets are off. I don't mind some 
swing, it adds character. 
 
 The techniques of sending with an iambic paddle, a bug and a straight key are 
 very 
 different. I don't think learning one helps you with the others.

Completely agree. To this day, I still can't send properly with an iambic 
paddle and tend to use them as though they were single lever paddles. Even 
though I've never owned such a beast. Really, really want another bug, though. 

But getting back to the straight key for a second, probably the worst code I've 
ever heard came from a straight key. Unfortunately, my friend Dave, N5RUL, had 
to suffer through that as his first cw contact. Were I not there to back him up 
on copy, and I really struggled with that myself, he'd have been completely 
lost and probably discouraged. The guy's dits and dahs were almost nearly the 
same length! Strange but true. In that case, I don't think a straight key 
helped him much. 
--
Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Straight key first?

2011-06-28 Thread Wayne Conrad
I'm too new to this to know much, but it seems to me that one might best 
learn to send Morse well by copying a lot of well sent Morse.  I only 
say this because I listened to computer generated Morse for months 
before I got on the air.  When I finally did send, I got compliments 
right away on my fist.  All I was doing, though, is sending the same 
rhythm I'd been hearing for months.

If this was already said, then I apologize for the redundant repetition :)

73, Wayne Conrad KF7QGA

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html