[Fink-users] Installing fink_64-bit and coot on 10. 6
Hi, I have installed the latest fink (0.29.9) in 64-bit mode, and issued an install coot to compile coot. When run, however, I get: DEBUG:: stating pydirectory /sw/share/coot/python INFO:: importing coot.py from /sw/share/coot/python/coot.py Importing python module coot using command from coot import * INFO:: coot.py imported Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?) /sw/bin/coot: line 5: 27050 Abort trap /sw/bin/coot-real $@ Searching seems to suggest multiple python, but I have fresh installed the necessary software. Is coot not ready for 64-bit on 10.6? Otherwise, what is the best way to run coot/ccp4 on 10.6? Cheers, Nayden -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] arpack?
Ben Abbott wrote: I see arpack on the finkproject.org homepage 2009-08-28: arpack-96patched-1 (Solve large scale eigenvalue problems) http://www.finkproject.org/index.php?phpLang=en but I don't see it in the list of packages (on line for from the terminal). Can someone explain? If you don't see it from the terminal, then your selfupdate didn't work correctly. In case you are using selfupdate-rsync, then avoid the mirrors distfiles.master.finkmirrors.net sjc.ca.us.finkmirrors.net msn.wi.us.finkmirrors.net trd.no.eu.finkmirrors.net They are currently out of order. Use one of the 5 remaining mirrors. If by on line you mean the web package database, I can see arpack there. It has perhaps had a long refresh interval. In any case, you should never rely on it. -- Martin -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] arpack?
On 28/08/2009, at 23:09, Ben Abbott wrote: I see arpack on the finkproject.org homepage 2009-08-28: arpack-96patched-1 (Solve large scale eigenvalue problems) http://www.finkproject.org/index.php?phpLang=en but I don't see it in the list of packages (on line for from the terminal). Can someone explain? You haven't provided any information about your system, so I'd guess it's because: * arpack is only available on the unstable tree. The following FAQ entry explains how to enable that tree: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable * You might be stuck at the point release (July 2008 IIRC) and maybe arpack was released after the point release. Using either rsync or cvs for selfupdate should bring you up-to-date. The following FAQ section explains how to change from point to rsync or cvs: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/upgrade-fink.php I've written an article that explains these point, rsync, cvs selfupdate options: http://finkers.wordpress.com/2009/06/17/selfupdate-methods-point-rsync-cvs/ Cheers, -- monipol http://finkers.wordpress.com Submitting a Fink bug report? Read this: http://www.finkproject.org/doc/netiquette/index.php http://finkers.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/bug-reports/ -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Installing fink_64-bit and coot on 10.6
nayden wrote: Hi, I have installed the latest fink (0.29.9) in 64-bit mode, and issued an install coot to compile coot. When run, however, I get: DEBUG:: stating pydirectory /sw/share/coot/python INFO:: importing coot.py from /sw/share/coot/python/coot.py Importing python module coot using command from coot import * INFO:: coot.py imported Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?) /sw/bin/coot: line 5: 27050 Abort trap /sw/bin/coot-real $@ Searching seems to suggest multiple python, but I have fresh installed the necessary software. Is coot not ready for 64-bit on 10.6? Otherwise, what is the best way to run coot/ccp4 on 10.6? Cheers, Nayden I'm forwarding this onto the coot maintainer. One of our other maintainers mentioned on IRC that he was having problems with at least some python modules configuring themselves based on the number of bits in the running kernel. Since presumably you're on a fresh install of Fink (I'm assuming 64 bit mode means you configured Fink in that manner, not that you updated the OS your machine with a Fink installation on it, and now have it booted with 64 bit kernel) presumably this might be related. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] arpack?
On Aug 29, 2009, at 6:16 AM, monipol wrote: On 28/08/2009, at 23:09, Ben Abbott wrote: I see arpack on the finkproject.org homepage 2009-08-28: arpack-96patched-1 (Solve large scale eigenvalue problems) http://www.finkproject.org/index.php?phpLang=en but I don't see it in the list of packages (on line for from the terminal). Can someone explain? You haven't provided any information about your system, so I'd guess it's because: * arpack is only available on the unstable tree. The following FAQ entry explains how to enable that tree: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable I've got unstable turned on. * You might be stuck at the point release (July 2008 IIRC) and maybe arpack was released after the point release. Using either rsync or cvs for selfupdate should bring you up-to-date. The following FAQ section explains how to change from point to rsync or cvs: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/upgrade-fink.php I first noticed this a week or so back. It is likely that something like that was my problem. At the moment my problem might be that I've upgraded to Mac OS 10.6 and choose the 32bit branch. Is arpack available for 10.6? I've written an article that explains these point, rsync, cvs selfupdate options: http://finkers.wordpress.com/2009/06/17/selfupdate-methods-point-rsync-cvs/ Very nice. I hadn't realized there was a Fink blog. Ben -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
$ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev Depends on system-xfree86-dev, but system-xfree86-dev only allows things to BuildDepend on it. Reading dependency for fontconfig2-dev-2.4.1-208... [snip] Unpacking replacement fontconfig2-shlibs ... Setting up fontconfig2-shlibs (2.4.1-208) ... Setting up fontconfig2-dev (2.4.1-208) ... WARNING: /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.la does not exist, skipping. [snip] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libSM.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgutils.la] Error 1 make: *** [libgutils] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.oD4y6C failed, exit code 2 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 (Reading database ... 245688 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 ... Updating the list of locally available binary packages. Scanning dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386 New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- dev_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- shlibs_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb Failed: phase compiling: fontforge-20090408-201 failed Before reporting any errors, please run fink selfupdate and try again. If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the FAQ on fink's website solves the problem. If not, ask on the fink-users or fink-beginners mailing lists, with a carbon copy to the maintainer: Daniel Johnson dan...@daniel-johnson.org Note that this is preferable to emailing the maintainer directly, since most fink package maintainers do not have access to all possible hardware and software configurations. I notice there are dynamic libs for the missing x11 libs. $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libfree* /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.dylib $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libSM* /usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.0.0.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.dylib /usr/X11/ lib/libSM.dylib Is Apple's X11 to blame (do I need to install Xquartz?)? … or does the fontconfig2-dev package need to be modified to work with Snow Leopard? ... or something else? Ben -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Ben Abbott wrote: $ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev Depends on system-xfree86-dev, but system-xfree86-dev only allows things to BuildDepend on it. Reading dependency for fontconfig2-dev-2.4.1-208... [snip] Unpacking replacement fontconfig2-shlibs ... Setting up fontconfig2-shlibs (2.4.1-208) ... Setting up fontconfig2-dev (2.4.1-208) ... WARNING: /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.la does not exist, skipping. [snip] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libSM.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgutils.la] Error 1 make: *** [libgutils] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.oD4y6C failed, exit code 2 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 (Reading database ... 245688 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 ... Updating the list of locally available binary packages. Scanning dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386 New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- dev_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- shlibs_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb Failed: phase compiling: fontforge-20090408-201 failed Before reporting any errors, please run fink selfupdate and try again. If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the FAQ on fink's website solves the problem. If not, ask on the fink- users or fink-beginners mailing lists, with a carbon copy to the maintainer: Daniel Johnson dan...@daniel-johnson.org Note that this is preferable to emailing the maintainer directly, since most fink package maintainers do not have access to all possible hardware and software configurations. I notice there are dynamic libs for the missing x11 libs. $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libfree* /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.dylib $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libSM* /usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.0.0.dylib/usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.dylib /usr/X11/ lib/libSM.dylib Is Apple's X11 to blame (do I need to install Xquartz?)? According to the macosforge x11 mailing list, there isn't an xquartz for snow leopard yet -- 2.4.0 won't install on 10.6, and 2.4.1 isn't targeted until around December. … or does the fontconfig2-dev package need to be modified to work with Snow Leopard? ... or something else? Ben Dave -- David Reiser dbrei...@earthlink.net -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] arpack?
On 29/08/2009, at 09:54, Ben Abbott wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 6:16 AM, monipol wrote: On 28/08/2009, at 23:09, Ben Abbott wrote: I see arpack on the finkproject.org homepage 2009-08-28: arpack-96patched-1 (Solve large scale eigenvalue problems) http://www.finkproject.org/index.php?phpLang=en but I don't see it in the list of packages (on line for from the terminal). Can someone explain? You haven't provided any information about your system, so I'd guess it's because: * arpack is only available on the unstable tree. The following FAQ entry explains how to enable that tree: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable I've got unstable turned on. * You might be stuck at the point release (July 2008 IIRC) and maybe arpack was released after the point release. Using either rsync or cvs for selfupdate should bring you up-to-date. The following FAQ section explains how to change from point to rsync or cvs: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/upgrade-fink.php I first noticed this a week or so back. It is likely that something like that was my problem. At the moment my problem might be that I've upgraded to Mac OS 10.6 and choose the 32bit branch. Is arpack available for 10.6? I don't see any restrictions on arpack so it should be available on 10.6. I'm not 100% sure though because I'm not running Snow Leopard yet. Have you followed the upgrade instructions available on Fink's home page? http://www.finkproject.org I've written an article that explains these point, rsync, cvs selfupdate options: http://finkers.wordpress.com/2009/06/17/selfupdate-methods-point-rsync-cvs/ Very nice. I hadn't realized there was a Fink blog. Ben Cheers, -- monipol http://finkers.wordpress.com Submitting a Fink bug report? Read this: http://www.finkproject.org/doc/netiquette/index.php http://finkers.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/bug-reports/ -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
Ben Abbott wrote: $ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev Depends on system-xfree86-dev, but system-xfree86-dev only allows things to BuildDepend on it. Reading dependency for fontconfig2-dev-2.4.1-208... [snip] Unpacking replacement fontconfig2-shlibs ... Setting up fontconfig2-shlibs (2.4.1-208) ... Setting up fontconfig2-dev (2.4.1-208) ... WARNING: /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.la does not exist, skipping. [snip] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libSM.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgutils.la] Error 1 make: *** [libgutils] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.oD4y6C failed, exit code 2 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 (Reading database ... 245688 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 ... Updating the list of locally available binary packages. Scanning dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386 New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- dev_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- shlibs_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb Failed: phase compiling: fontforge-20090408-201 failed Before reporting any errors, please run fink selfupdate and try again. If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the FAQ on fink's website solves the problem. If not, ask on the fink-users or fink-beginners mailing lists, with a carbon copy to the maintainer: Daniel Johnson dan...@daniel-johnson.org Note that this is preferable to emailing the maintainer directly, since most fink package maintainers do not have access to all possible hardware and software configurations. I notice there are dynamic libs for the missing x11 libs. $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libfree* /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.dylib $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libSM* /usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.0.0.dylib/usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.dylib /usr/X11/ lib/libSM.dylib Is Apple's X11 to blame (do I need to install Xquartz?)? … or does the fontconfig2-dev package need to be modified to work with Snow Leopard? ... or something else? Ben Your problem was _not_ with fontconfig2-dev. The messages about it were from the automatic scanpackages run after a build, and indicate _successfully_ adding .debs for it to your list. The issue is with fontforge. I'll cc that maintainer, who has been building on Snow Leopard. He may have more insight to what's going on here. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] arpack?
monipol wrote: I don't see any restrictions on arpack so it should be available on 10.6. I'm not 100% sure though because I'm not running Snow Leopard yet. Have you followed the upgrade instructions available on Fink's home page? http://www.finkproject.org Arpack was added to the distro yesterday. It doesn't have a Distribution or Architecture restriction (yet). I'm inclined to blame bad mirrors. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Installing fink_64-bit and coot on 10.6
Hi Nayden: I only got ahold of 10.6 late yesterday afternoon, after I found out from Apple my pre-ordered copy would not be shipped until September 8th. So I will have to get back to you after I try to compile it. Bill On Aug 29, 2009, at 5:43 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: nayden wrote: Hi, I have installed the latest fink (0.29.9) in 64-bit mode, and issued an install coot to compile coot. When run, however, I get: DEBUG:: stating pydirectory /sw/share/coot/python INFO:: importing coot.py from /sw/share/coot/python/coot.py Importing python module coot using command from coot import * INFO:: coot.py imported Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?) /sw/bin/coot: line 5: 27050 Abort trap /sw/bin/coot- real $@ Searching seems to suggest multiple python, but I have fresh installed the necessary software. Is coot not ready for 64-bit on 10.6? Otherwise, what is the best way to run coot/ccp4 on 10.6? Cheers, Nayden I'm forwarding this onto the coot maintainer. One of our other maintainers mentioned on IRC that he was having problems with at least some python modules configuring themselves based on the number of bits in the running kernel. Since presumably you're on a fresh install of Fink (I'm assuming 64 bit mode means you configured Fink in that manner, not that you updated the OS your machine with a Fink installation on it, and now have it booted with 64 bit kernel) presumably this might be related. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
Ben Abbott wrote: [] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libSM.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgutils.la] Error 1 make: *** [libgutils] Error 2 [] Is Apple's X11 to blame (do I need to install Xquartz?)? Yes and no. Apple is to blame, but installing Xquartz won't help. Apple has been changing their mind a couple of times about the presence of the *.la libtool files in /usr/X11/lib. While they disappeared in xcode-3.1.2 (IIRC) and in the recent xquartz updates, they came back in the last xcode for 10.5, xcode-3.1.3, and they are gone now in 10.6. … or does the fontconfig2-dev package need to be modified to work with Snow Leopard? ... or something else? The Fink chiefs need to wake up and pull their head out of the sand where they have been keeping it for the last year. This disaster has been announced for a long time, but nothing has been decided about it yet (CCing fink-core). At the moment I see 3 solutions: 1. Get the *.la files back. This can be done for example by running the script I prepared for this situation some months ago (google for fix-x11-la.sh). I haven't tested this on 10.6, but it should work there, too (famous last words...) 2. Remove and then rebuild any package that has anything to do with X11. The time needed for organizing this will probably be more or less equivalent to removing /sw altogether and installing Fink from scratch. 3. Before building packages, remove all *.la files in the fink tree: sudo find /sw/lib/ -name \*.la --delete The problem with the latter solution is that when a dev package gets pulled in during the build process, it may reintroduce contaminated *.la files. Thus all required builddeps would have to be installed first and then the *.la-removal command be run. -- Martin -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] nedit-5.6-cvs20081118-1 test package
The problem seems to be solved: I installed the test package: nedit 5.6cvs20081118-2 and openmotif4 /openmotif4-shlibs 2.3.2-1 First test's: copy paste into one window; from one to the other; column copy and paste; from other applications into nedit without any problem. I did not disable any option of X11 2.4.0, only Update Pasteboard immediately when new text is selected is disabled (I think that is the default option) Thank you Jack - well done. I hope somebody else can verify those results. P. PS: your question concerning: lesstif-0.95.0-1 and nedit-5.5-1 working is: nedit 5.5-2 lesstif-shlibs 0.95.0-1 together with X11 2.4.0 - options as above Message: 1 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:20:23 -0400 From: Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu Subject: [Fink-users] nedit-5.6-cvs20081118-1 test package To: fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 20090828032023.ga7...@bromo.med.uc.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I have updated lesstif to fix error upstream when the debian 64-bit patches were applied (missing braces). However this is only part of the fix. It eliminates the bus errors in nedit but the copy/paste seems non-functional. I have created updated nedit packaging using the same nedit-5.6-cvs20081118 tarball that debian sid is using. This seems to work fine under i386 and x86_64 fink as long as the option Update Pasteboard when clipboard changes option has been disabled in the X11 2.4.0 preferences. Please test. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2846002group_id=17203atid=414256 Jack -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:47:00 -0400 From: Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu Subject: [Fink-users] more nedit pasting questions To: fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 20090828034700.ga7...@bromo.med.uc.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Is anyone using the older lesstif-0.95.0-1 and nedit-5.5-1 packages from fink unstable? Do you have any issues with pasting? In my hands, these packages seem to often silently refuse to paste under X11 2.4.0 without bus errors. If I disable Update Pasteboard when CLIPBOARD changes, pasting works. Under nedit 5.6-cvs20081118 the Update Pasteboard when CLIPBOARD changes option when enabled triggers an error message XmClipboardInquireLength() failed: clipboard locked instead of silently failing. Is everyone having to disable this option to paste under nedit with Xquartz? Jack -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: [] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libSM.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgutils.la] Error 1 make: *** [libgutils] Error 2 [] Is Apple's X11 to blame (do I need to install Xquartz?)? Yes and no. Apple is to blame, but installing Xquartz won't help. Apple has been changing their mind a couple of times about the presence of the *.la libtool files in /usr/X11/lib. While they disappeared in xcode-3.1.2 (IIRC) and in the recent xquartz updates, they came back in the last xcode for 10.5, xcode-3.1.3, and they are gone now in 10.6. … or does the fontconfig2-dev package need to be modified to work with Snow Leopard? ... or something else? The Fink chiefs need to wake up and pull their head out of the sand where they have been keeping it for the last year. This disaster has been announced for a long time, but nothing has been decided about it yet (CCing fink-core). At the moment I see 3 solutions: 1. Get the *.la files back. This can be done for example by running the script I prepared for this situation some months ago (google for fix-x11-la.sh). I haven't tested this on 10.6, but it should work there, too (famous last words...) I assume the link below is good? http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/experimental/costabel/fix-x11-la.sh?view=log I notice you have an undo option (very nice). In any event, it didn't work for me on 10.6 -rpath /sw/lib/fontforge -version-info 4:7:0 libtool: link: warning: `/sw/lib/libfreetype.la' seems to be moved grep: /usr/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libiconv.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgdraw.la] Error 1 make: *** [libgdraw] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.1.wd42rv failed, exit code 2 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 (Reading database ... 245688 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 ... Failed: phase compiling: fontforge-20090408-201 failed Ben -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
Ben Abbott wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: [] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory [] I assume the link below is good? http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/experimental/costabel/fix-x11-la.sh?view=log Yes. I notice you have an undo option (very nice). In any event, it didn't work for me on 10.6 -rpath /sw/lib/fontforge -version-info 4:7:0 libtool: link: warning: `/sw/lib/libfreetype.la' seems to be moved grep: /usr/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libiconv.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgdraw.la] Error 1 Great. I hadn't even noticed that they removed *all* *.la files, not only those in X11. I guess nobody has really tried running fink in a 10.5-10.6/32bit upgraded configuration. I guess this kills it. Either someone comes up very quickly with an idea how the fink build process can eliminate all *.la files in /sw/lib, or the upgrade path 10.5-10.6 is dead. -- Martin -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Installing fink_64-bit and coot on 10.6
Alexander Hansen alexanderk.hansen at gmail.com writes: I'm forwarding this onto the coot maintainer. One of our other maintainers mentioned on IRC that he was having problems with at least some python modules configuring themselves based on the number of bits in the running kernel. Since presumably you're on a fresh install of Fink (I'm assuming 64 bit mode means you configured Fink in that manner, not that you updated the OS your machine with a Fink installation on it, and now have it booted with 64 bit kernel) presumably this might be related. Thanks. Yes, I installed a new version of FInk from scratch from default 32-bit Kernel. I'm not sure if it's relevant, but for what it's worth, I tried booting into the 64-bit kernel to run my new fink and coot, but get the same error (I didn't recompile or anything, however). -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: $ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev Depends on system-xfree86-dev, but system-xfree86-dev only allows things to BuildDepend on it. Reading dependency for fontconfig2-dev-2.4.1-208... [snip] Unpacking replacement fontconfig2-shlibs ... Setting up fontconfig2-shlibs (2.4.1-208) ... Setting up fontconfig2-dev (2.4.1-208) ... WARNING: /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.la does not exist, skipping. [snip] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libSM.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgutils.la] Error 1 make: *** [libgutils] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.oD4y6C failed, exit code 2 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 (Reading database ... 245688 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 ... Updating the list of locally available binary packages. Scanning dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386 New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- dev_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- shlibs_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb Failed: phase compiling: fontforge-20090408-201 failed Before reporting any errors, please run fink selfupdate and try again. If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the FAQ on fink's website solves the problem. If not, ask on the fink- users or fink-beginners mailing lists, with a carbon copy to the maintainer: Daniel Johnson dan...@daniel-johnson.org Note that this is preferable to emailing the maintainer directly, since most fink package maintainers do not have access to all possible hardware and software configurations. I notice there are dynamic libs for the missing x11 libs. $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libfree* /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.dylib $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libSM* /usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.0.0.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.dylib /usr/X11/ lib/libSM.dylib Is Apple's X11 to blame (do I need to install Xquartz?)? … or does the fontconfig2-dev package need to be modified to work with Snow Leopard? ... or something else? Ben Your problem was _not_ with fontconfig2-dev. The messages about it were from the automatic scanpackages run after a build, and indicate _successfully_ adding .debs for it to your list. The issue is with fontforge. I'll cc that maintainer, who has been building on Snow Leopard. He may have more insight to what's going on here. Urk, sent from wrong account. I know that fontforge builds on i386/10.5 and x86_64/10.6. This looks like a case of upgrading from 10.5 and using packages built with xquartz. The only workaround is to rebuild all X11 using packages, unfortunately. Daniel smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
On Aug 29, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: $ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev Depends on system-xfree86-dev, but system-xfree86-dev only allows things to BuildDepend on it. Reading dependency for fontconfig2-dev-2.4.1-208... [snip] Unpacking replacement fontconfig2-shlibs ... Setting up fontconfig2-shlibs (2.4.1-208) ... Setting up fontconfig2-dev (2.4.1-208) ... WARNING: /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.la does not exist, skipping. [snip] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libSM.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgutils.la] Error 1 make: *** [libgutils] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.oD4y6C failed, exit code 2 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 (Reading database ... 245688 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-fontforge-20090408-201 ... Updating the list of locally available binary packages. Scanning dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386 New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- dev_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb New package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/x11/fontconfig2- shlibs_2.4.1-208_darwin-i386.deb Failed: phase compiling: fontforge-20090408-201 failed Before reporting any errors, please run fink selfupdate and try again. If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the FAQ on fink's website solves the problem. If not, ask on the fink- users or fink-beginners mailing lists, with a carbon copy to the maintainer: Daniel Johnson dan...@daniel-johnson.org Note that this is preferable to emailing the maintainer directly, since most fink package maintainers do not have access to all possible hardware and software configurations. I notice there are dynamic libs for the missing x11 libs. $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libfree* /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libfreetype.dylib $ ls /usr/X11/lib/libSM* /usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.0.0.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libSM.6.dylib /usr/X11/ lib/libSM.dylib Is Apple's X11 to blame (do I need to install Xquartz?)? … or does the fontconfig2-dev package need to be modified to work with Snow Leopard? ... or something else? Ben Your problem was _not_ with fontconfig2-dev. The messages about it were from the automatic scanpackages run after a build, and indicate _successfully_ adding .debs for it to your list. The issue is with fontforge. I'll cc that maintainer, who has been building on Snow Leopard. He may have more insight to what's going on here. Urk, sent from wrong account. I know that fontforge builds on i386/10.5 and x86_64/10.6. This looks like a case of upgrading from 10.5 and using packages built with xquartz. The only workaround is to rebuild all X11 using packages, unfortunately. Daniel Is there a quick and simple way to determine which packages I've installed depend upon X11? Ben -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
Ben Abbott wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: [] I know that fontforge builds on i386/10.5 and x86_64/10.6. This looks like a case of upgrading from 10.5 and using packages built with xquartz. The only workaround is to rebuild all X11 using packages, unfortunately. Daniel Is there a quick and simple way to determine which packages I've installed depend upon X11? As your last error message showed, it is not only the X11-dependent packages that are concerned by Apple's removal of *.la files. It can be basically anything. What you could test, before throwing away /sw and starting from scratch, is to remove all *.la files from fink: sudo find /sw/lib -name \*\.la -delete (I hope this time I got it right). This might need to be repeated when a dev package is swapped in from an already compiled package. Remove also the *.la files in /usr/X11/lib if you created them. Then try to build fontforge and your other packages. -- Martin -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure
On Aug 29, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: [] I know that fontforge builds on i386/10.5 and x86_64/10.6. This looks like a case of upgrading from 10.5 and using packages built with xquartz. The only workaround is to rebuild all X11 using packages, unfortunately. Daniel Is there a quick and simple way to determine which packages I've installed depend upon X11? As your last error message showed, it is not only the X11-dependent packages that are concerned by Apple's removal of *.la files. It can be basically anything. What you could test, before throwing away /sw and starting from scratch, is to remove all *.la files from fink: sudo find /sw/lib -name \*\.la -delete (I hope this time I got it right). This might need to be repeated when a dev package is swapped in from an already compiled package. Remove also the *.la files in /usr/X11/lib if you created them. Then try to build fontforge and your other packages. ok. That solved my current problem. Ben -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
