Re: [gentoo-user] Re: rfc viewer
I used rfcutil, which isn't a rfc viwer. And it's just a tool which can be used to fetch rfc conveniently. -- Shaochun Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] SquirrelMail GPG plugin make bad signature with my keys
On Thursday 22 March 2007 22:11, Xavier Parizet wrote: Hi, I use squirrelmail-1.4.9a with GPG plugin enabled (with gnupg-2.0.3 and the builtin gpg plugin). I don't know which information you need to check this problem, but you can check on this email if my GPG signature is good or bad. The signature is good - see below: $ gpg \[gentoo-user\]\ SquirrelMail\ GPG\ plugin\ make\ bad\ signature\ with\ my\ keys gpg: armor header: Hash: SHA1 gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) gpg: original file name='' gpg: [gentoo-user] SquirrelMail GPG plugin make bad signature with my keys: unknown suffix Enter new filename: test1.txt gpg: Signature made Thu Mar 22 22:11:38 2007 GMT using DSA key ID E4D9BE0D gpg: using classic trust model gpg: Good signature from Xavier Parizet (Blackhawk) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Xavier Parizet (Blackhawk) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka [jpeg image of size 3093] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: CEAF 234F FB35 BE64 3ABB E437 9923 5A39 E4D9 BE0D gpg: textmode signature, digest algorithm SHA1 HTH. -- Regards, Mick -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [Way OT] Kernel Symlink use or not use?
On Thursday 22 March 2007, Jakob Buchgraber wrote: It's as follows: In /etc/profile Set $KERNEL_DIR to /kernel/src/current (symlink) Set $KBUILD_OUTPUT to /dir/to/store/output/files So what's the best way and _why_? Does it even matter? Yes it does matter. And you are using docs from three sources and assuming they apply universally, which they do not. The LFS docs tell you what to do on an LFS system, the gentoo docs tell you what to do on a gentoo system, and the kernel docs are outdated and tell you to avoid making a mistake that doesn't apply to gentoo at all. Many Gentoo scripts rely on /usr/src/linux pointing to the currently *running* kernel. Without it, vmware-modules won't build for example. The kernel headers are nowhere near /usr/src so the warning in kernel docs is irrelevant. I'm not sure how LFS does these things, but you should take their docs seriously when working on one of their boxes alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [Way OT] Kernel Symlink use or not use?
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:42:09 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Many Gentoo scripts rely on /usr/src/linux pointing to the currently *running* kernel. Without it, vmware-modules won't build for example. The symlink needs to point to the target kernel, the currently running kernel can be determined from uname -r. This is important when you have built a new kernel and need to re-emerge something like nvidia-drivers (or vmware-modules as you mention, but this isn't so urgent). The running kernel already has the modules, the symlink means the new merge build for the new kernel, so you don;t lose X (or vmware) when you reboot. -- Neil Bothwick Things which must be shipped together as a set, aren't. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: Any Flash editor with gui?
Mark David Dumlao wrote: A lot of Linux users don't like Flash because it is not a standard. When Adobe makes the player source available, I bet we will see Flash compilers for other platforms. :-) Yeah, but I think in the long run, 'not liking flash' is a 'bad thing'. There's a lot of good blood in the flash community that is both willing and able to spontaneously develop 2 things Linux users want: games and User Interfaces. No I'm not saying do flash. I'm saying there's a substantial community base that's alienated by Linux users, and they have a lot to bring to the table if only there were 'liberated'. Agreed. It's not going to happen until the standard is liberated tho, like ECMA JavaScript or .NET (which I believe is why mono is acceptable to gnu.org.) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [Way OT] Kernel Symlink use or not use?
On Friday 23 March 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:42:09 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Many Gentoo scripts rely on /usr/src/linux pointing to the currently *running* kernel. Without it, vmware-modules won't build for example. The symlink needs to point to the target kernel, the currently running kernel can be determined from uname -r. This is important when you have built a new kernel and need to re-emerge something like nvidia-drivers (or vmware-modules as you mention, but this isn't so urgent). The running kernel already has the modules, the symlink means the new merge build for the new kernel, so you don;t lose X (or vmware) when you reboot. Ah, my bad. You are right, of course. alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [Way OT] Kernel Symlink use or not use?
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:24:38 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Ah, my bad. You are right, of course. What I neglected to mention was that the main point of your post was absolutely correct. There is no conflict between the Gentoo and LFS documentation, both are correct when used in the only place they apply. -- Neil Bothwick ... We are Dyslexics of Borg. Your ass will be laminated. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: [Way OT] Kernel Symlink use or not use?
Xavier Parizet wrote: I think that the /usr/src/linux symlink is used in Gentoo by ebuilds (as vmware-modules for example) that build kernel modules for specific hardware which aren't yet in the kernel, and so needs to know the current kernel config to see if it match their dependencies or requirements. This is true. I have personally found however that the USE flag symlink is annoying, since I rarely upgrade the kernel when the sources become available. Anything that needs to know where the currently running sources are gets tripped over if an update has changed the symlink before I've bothered to compile the new kernel. The real problem comes when you change the flag, and then emerge -uDN world tries to rebuild the sources pkg with the new use flag. This was the motivation for the no-rebuild array (nr) in this script: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-546828.html Sorry didn't mean to get a plug in ;) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] RE: layman overlays
John covici wrote: checking which gecko to use... firefox checking for compiler -fshort-wchar option... yes checking whether to enable C++ RTTI... no checking whether we have a gtk 2 gecko build... configure: error: This program needs a gtk 2 gecko build Seems to be saying ff wasn't built with gtk2 use flag (which i thought was set by default.) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] RE: layman overlays
there is no gtk2 USE flag any longer,it was substituted with gtk.. On 3/23/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John covici wrote: checking which gecko to use... firefox checking for compiler -fshort-wchar option... yes checking whether to enable C++ RTTI... no checking whether we have a gtk 2 gecko build... configure: error: This program needs a gtk 2 gecko build Seems to be saying ff wasn't built with gtk2 use flag (which i thought was set by default.) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- purple..
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with udev and network cards changing device name
On Thursday 22 March 2007, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with udev and network cards changing device name': Delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules It won't come back next time udev is installed? This associated network interfaces with MAC addresses, so the cards come up the same way each time. your problem is caused by the file on the new box containing the MAC addresses of the cards on the original box, so it creates two more. A similar thing happens if you replace a network card. Delete the file and it starts again at zero. A little off-topic, but the recent addition of this file, along with the matching persistent-net-generator rules caused me some grief. I know that MAC addresses are supposed to be suitable as a way to identify network cards, but everyone also knows that they can be changed easily. In fact, I'm lucky enough that both the built-in interfaces on my MB have invalid MACs (FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF and FF:FF:FF:FF:00:00) so the kernel assigns them random MAC addresses. I assign them fixed MACs (vendor:FA:CA:DE) and (vendor:EF:FA:CE) using the macchanger features of Gentoo's net init script. This had worked since I got the MB, and wasn't something I really wanted to change. With the new udev scripts in place, the pair of interfaces gradually increased their number to eth10 and eth11 (rebooting due to unrelated issues), which made my init scripts so longer run and left me manually starting the interfaces (not fun). I didn't want to delete the files, although I didn't need them, under the fear that they'd just keep coming back. The persistent-net rules script looked quite editable, so I (finally) learned how to write my own, useful udev rules, so force the identification I've always known and loved (ethX by PCI device number). -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/ New GPG Key! Old key expires 2007-03-25. Upgrade NOW! pgpVtew5gE31y.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] [Way OT] Kernel Symlink use or not use?
On Thursday 22 March 2007, Jakob Buchgraber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about '[gentoo-user] [Way OT] Kernel Symlink use or not use?': I considered switching to LFS a while ago as this would be the only Linux distribution fulfilling my requirements (besides Gentoo, of course). So when reading the LFS Book there was a warning saying Quote from LFS Book 6.2: I have never seen having the symlink cause a problem, unless the symlink was to the wrong kernel. I can't imagine a case where that would be true, so I'm dubious that this quote is based on any real issues. The Gentoo Documentation however says: Are you using LFS or Gentoo? I guess you should follow the documentation for what you are actually using. Or, do you regularly consult your toaster's manual for how to operate your microwave? But the $KERNEL_DIR/README says: This is an instruction for compiling userland programs. In particular userland shouldn't include headers from /usr/src/linux, EVER. Those files may change depending on what kernel is installed so they can't be accurately targeted by anything that doesn't closely track the kernel. (If it tracks the kernel that close, so that it has to be compiled for a specific kernel [and specific /configuration/ of that kernel], it should be a kernel module.) Instead your userland programs should use the /usr/include/linux area. (If they have need of linux-specific headers; standard POSIX / C99 / C++03 headers can be found elsewhere.) So after reading this I searched groups.google.com and the forums about this issue and found a different approach, which can be used instead of the /usr/src/linux symlink. Just setting KERNEL_DIR should be enough, but I'm not sure if that will be supported by Gentoo, you should just use the symlink, as the docs say (and as many proprietary, out-of-tree modules expect). So what's the best way and _why_? /usr/src/linux symlink to current (generally running) kernel. Because that's what the docs say so that's what Gentoo supports. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/ New GPG Key! Old key expires 2007-03-25. Upgrade NOW! pgpLRdS0XJCJD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems with udev and network cards changing device name
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:04:16 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: Delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules It won't come back next time udev is installed? Yes it will, but with the correct information. the problem is that the old file had allocated eth0 and eth1 to MAC addresses not present in that machine. It will be recreated with correct MAC addresses for eth0 and eth1, so that the two cards will always be named the same way on each boot. I can see the reason for doing this, if you have two network cards it means they never get swapped over, without having to mess around with module loading order (which is an unreliable hack anyway). -- Neil Bothwick She's fine, upstanding, and wonderful laying down. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Clamassassin - does anyone know what is wrong?
#emerge clamassassin Calculating dependencies... done! Emerging (1 of 1) mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3 to / * clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz RMD160 ;-) ... [ ok ] * clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz SHA1 ;-) ... [ ok ] * clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz SHA256 ;-) ... [ ok ] * clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz size ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ...[ ok ] * checking clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz ;-) ... [ ok ] Unpacking source... Unpacking clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3/work Source unpacked. Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3/work/clamassassin-1.2.3 ... ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --disable-subject-rewrite --disable-clamdscan --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for rm... /bin/rm checking for cat... /bin/cat checking for sed... /bin/sed checking for echo... /bin/echo checking for formail... /usr/bin/formail checking for mktemp... /bin/mktemp checking for sigtool... /usr/bin/sigtool checking for clamscan... /usr/bin/clamscan checking for clamdscan... /usr/bin/clamdscan checking for /tmp/clamd... no configure: ClamAV version 0.90 detected. configure: Using scanner /usr/bin/clamscan configure: Using scanner options --no-summary --stdout --mbox configure: Using virus signature file dir /var/lib/clamav configure: Signature version reporting is off. configure: Scanner name adding is on. configure: Using temporary directory /var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3/temp configure: Subject header rewriting is off. configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating clamassassin config.status: creating Makefile Source compiled. --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY --- LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-mail-filter_-_clamassassin-1.2.3-11762.log open_wr: /var/lib/clamav/.dbLock open_wr: /var/lib/clamav/.dbLock -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Clamassassin - does anyone know what is wrong?
Hi ! Please post the log file showed by the last line (LOG FILE =) after retrying to install it to see if the install process make the same error, because it seems it leaves the portage chroot... Regards. Friday 23 March 2007 19:38:17 Steve [Gentoo], you wrote : #emerge clamassassin Calculating dependencies... done! Emerging (1 of 1) mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3 to / * clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz RMD160 ;-) ... [ ok ] * clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz SHA1 ;-) ... [ ok ] * clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz SHA256 ;-) ... [ ok ] * clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz size ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ...[ ok ] * checking clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz ;-) ... [ ok ] Unpacking source... Unpacking clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3/work Source unpacked. Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3/work/clamassassin-1.2.3 ... ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --disable-subject-rewrite --disable-clamdscan --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for rm... /bin/rm checking for cat... /bin/cat checking for sed... /bin/sed checking for echo... /bin/echo checking for formail... /usr/bin/formail checking for mktemp... /bin/mktemp checking for sigtool... /usr/bin/sigtool checking for clamscan... /usr/bin/clamscan checking for clamdscan... /usr/bin/clamdscan checking for /tmp/clamd... no configure: ClamAV version 0.90 detected. configure: Using scanner /usr/bin/clamscan configure: Using scanner options --no-summary --stdout --mbox configure: Using virus signature file dir /var/lib/clamav configure: Signature version reporting is off. configure: Scanner name adding is on. configure: Using temporary directory /var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3/temp configure: Subject header rewriting is off. configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating clamassassin config.status: creating Makefile Source compiled. --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY --- LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-mail-filter_-_clamassassin-1.2.3-11762.log open_wr: /var/lib/clamav/.dbLock open_wr: /var/lib/clamav/.dbLock --- - -- Xavier Parizet http://www.linuxant.fr/ pgpbHCxQyG0Pq.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Question re: profiles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, This may be a stupid question, but hey, better safe than sorry. I'm updating my laptop, which I haven't used in a while. After syncing, I went to update and got a message saying that my arch was not set asking whether my profile was linked correctly. It wasn't, so I fixed that. /etc/make.profile is a symlink to /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1 (or whatever) Is it safe to remove older profiles? Regards, Colleen - -- Registered Linux User #411143 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGBDMFBEKKz3fpe6IRAtfpAJ99zJypYAO5Y4Ip2ty+SnINGeHJ5gCfb6W+ BIRfQG+Y42K+XB3guEkoreE= =0xtT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Question re: profiles
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:05:25 -0400, Colleen Beamer wrote: /etc/make.profile is a symlink to /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1 (or whatever) Is it safe to remove older profiles? There's no point, because they'll only be copied back the next time you sync. -- Neil Bothwick The sooner you fall behind the more time you'll have to catch up. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Question re: profiles
On Friday 23 March 2007 20:05, Colleen Beamer wrote: gpgkeys: key 04428ACF77E97BA2 not found on keyserver Hi all, This may be a stupid question, but hey, better safe than sorry. I'm updating my laptop, which I haven't used in a while. After syncing, I went to update and got a message saying that my arch was not set asking whether my profile was linked correctly. It wasn't, so I fixed that. /etc/make.profile is a symlink to /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1 (or whatever) Is it safe to remove older profiles? I guess you mean is it safe to remove older symlinks? Yes. I would not remove the profile files themselves under usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/. The symlink should be something like: # ls -la /etc/make.profile lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 54 Sep 2 2006 /etc/make.profile - /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop if you are running a desktop, or server, if you are running a server on that machine. HTH. -- Regards, Mick pgpFSR5GMXxdM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Question re: profiles
Colleen Beamer wrote: Hi all, This may be a stupid question, but hey, better safe than sorry. I'm updating my laptop, which I haven't used in a while. After syncing, I went to update and got a message saying that my arch was not set asking whether my profile was linked correctly. It wasn't, so I fixed that. /etc/make.profile is a symlink to /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1 (or whatever) Is it safe to remove older profiles? Regards, Colleen I think the profiles are updated when you sync, which is why you got that error message. You may want to either sync again or run emerge --metadata one. I seem to recall running into this and it can't update the database without that link being correct. The metadata part should fix it. That said, someone feel free to correct me if I am wrong. Dale :-) :-) :-) -- www.myspace.com/-remove-me-dalek1967 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: rfc viewer
* Shaochun Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-23 08:29] : I used rfcutil, which isn't a rfc viwer. And it's just a tool which can be used to fetch rfc conveniently. Sorry about that :-/ I didn't know that 'rfc -l #' is beyond your needs ... My apologies Stefan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Clamassassin - does anyone know what is wrong?
Good evening !
I've found the bug on bugzilla at
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168716 , and I've corrected it
submitting a patch and a new ebuild to prevent the sandbox violation caused
by the configure script when it try to verify if there is a virus database
already installed.
It works fine on my two Gentoo boxes (x86 and x86_64).
The patch and the ebuild are attached to this email.
To test my patch, save clamassassin.patch
as /usr/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin/files/clamassassin.patch, save
clamassassin-1.2.3-r2.ebuild
as /usr/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin/clamassassin-1.2.3-r2.ebuild .
After this is done, run the following command :
ebuild /usr/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin/clamassassin-1.2.3-r2.ebuild
digest to recalculate the digests and to finish run emerge
=clamassassin-1.2.3-r2 .
Regards.
Le Friday 23 March 2007 19:48:29 Xavier Parizet, vous avez écrit :
Hi !
Please post the log file showed by the last line (LOG FILE =) after
retrying to install it to see if the install process make the same error,
because it seems it leaves the portage chroot...
Regards.
Friday 23 March 2007 19:38:17 Steve [Gentoo], you wrote :
#emerge clamassassin
Calculating dependencies... done!
Emerging (1 of 1) mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3 to /
* clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz RMD160 ;-)
... [ ok ]
* clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz SHA1 ;-)
... [ ok ]
* clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz SHA256 ;-)
... [ ok ]
* clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz size ;-)
... [ ok ]
* checking ebuild checksums ;-)
... [ ok ]
* checking auxfile checksums ;-)
... [ ok ]
* checking miscfile checksums ;-)
...[ ok ]
* checking clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz ;-)
... [ ok ]
Unpacking source...
Unpacking clamassassin-1.2.3.tar.gz to
/var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3/work
Source unpacked.
Compiling source in
/var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3/work/clamassassin-1.2.3
... ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share
--sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --disable-subject-rewrite
--disable-clamdscan --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for rm... /bin/rm
checking for cat... /bin/cat
checking for sed... /bin/sed
checking for echo... /bin/echo
checking for formail... /usr/bin/formail
checking for mktemp... /bin/mktemp
checking for sigtool... /usr/bin/sigtool
checking for clamscan... /usr/bin/clamscan
checking for clamdscan... /usr/bin/clamdscan
checking for /tmp/clamd... no
configure: ClamAV version 0.90 detected.
configure: Using scanner /usr/bin/clamscan
configure: Using scanner options --no-summary --stdout --mbox
configure: Using virus signature file dir /var/lib/clamav
configure: Signature version reporting is off.
configure: Scanner name adding is on.
configure: Using temporary directory
/var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/clamassassin-1.2.3/temp
configure: Subject header rewriting is off.
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating clamassassin
config.status: creating Makefile
Source compiled.
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE =
/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-mail-filter_-_clamassassin-1.2.3-11762.log
open_wr: /var/lib/clamav/.dbLock
open_wr: /var/lib/clamav/.dbLock
-
-- -
--
Xavier Parizet
http://www.linuxant.fr/
# Copyright 1999-2006 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header:
/var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/mail-filter/clamassassin/clamassassin-1.2.3.ebuild,v
1.2 2006/03/13 14:22:42 ticho Exp $
inherit eutils autotools
DESCRIPTION=clamassassin is a simple script for virus scanning (through
clamav) an e-mail message as a
filter (like spamassassin)
HOMEPAGE=http://drivel.com/clamassassin/;
SRC_URI=http://drivel.com/clamassassin/${P}.tar.gz;
LICENSE=BSD
SLOT=0
KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~ppc ~sparc x86
IUSE=subject-rewrite clamd
DEPEND==app-antivirus/clamav-0.75.1
sys-apps/debianutils
sys-apps/which
mail-filter/procmail
src_compile() {
epatch ${FILESDIR}/clamassassin.patch
eautoreconf || die
econf \
$(use_enable subject-rewrite) \
$(use_enable clamd clamdscan) \
|| die
# Fix problems with Portage exporting TMP and breaking clamassassin.
#61806
sed -i -e s:${TMP}:/tmp: clamassassin
}
src_install() {
dobin clamassassin
dodoc CHANGELOG LICENSE README
}
diff -Naur clamassassin-1.2.3.new/configure.ac
Re: [gentoo-user] Question re: profiles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:05:25 -0400, Colleen Beamer wrote: /etc/make.profile is a symlink to /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1 (or whatever) Is it safe to remove older profiles? There's no point, because they'll only be copied back the next time you sync. Thanks for the response. I guess I was just looking to keep my hard drive and free of superfluous files as possible. Regards, Colleen - -- Registered Linux User #411143 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGBG3vBEKKz3fpe6IRAq5OAJ0Rdr74atxtvsuyUTh8iKaRYKzSCwCaAjE6 y/7I9s3mqfPJfE937ocPuH0= =kQgp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Question re: profiles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dale wrote: Colleen Beamer wrote: Is it safe to remove older profiles? Regards, Colleen I think the profiles are updated when you sync, which is why you got that error message. This is true. You may want to either sync again or run emerge --metadata one. I seem to recall running into this and it can't update the database without that link being correct. The metadata part should fix it. Not necessary. I just recreated the symlink to point to the correct profile. Not rocket science, even for someone like me who does not have a formal computer education. :-) Thanks for your response. Regards, Colleen. - -- Registered Linux User #411143 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGBG6GBEKKz3fpe6IRArI5AJ98bDKEQExkZEDfHVa9WmjVXliL/ACbBm1r 6VjCwTBVbVmJwLgaIpOawHI= =TFeB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] flash sound?
This is getting very frustrating. As I've said, sound works as user ernie in all apps except flash.I have sound in flash as root, so the plugin is there. # find / libflashplayer* 2 /dev/null | grep libflashplayer /home/ernie/Desktop/install_flash_player_9_linux/libflashplayer.so /home/ernie/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so /home/ernie/.netscape/plugins/libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/nsbrowser/plugins/libflashplayer.so /opt/netscape/plugins/libflashplayer.so # ls -l /home/ernie/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 ernie users 7040080 Mar 23 22:02 /home/ernie/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so I have device permissions set up properly unless libflashplayer.so uses some device I don't know about. /dev/sound/* are all root:audio and ernie is in the audio group. I guess this is obvious because all other audio apps work fine as ernie. I've been racking my brain and searching for info, but I can't get this working. Please, someone help me out here. On Thursday 22 March 2007, a tiny voice compelled Ernie Schroder to write: On Thursday 22 March 2007, a tiny voice compelled Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman to write: Ernie Schroder wrote: OR a permission problem Then use id. Check out to which groups the ernie user belongs to. Then check out with ls -l /dev/any/sound/device and see what happens. Usually users should be in the audio group. -- Arturo Buanzo Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica Foros GNU/Buanzo: Respeto, Soluciones y Buena Onda: http://foros.buanzo.com.ar Consulting and Secure Mail Hosting: http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/ $ ls -al /dev/sound/ total 0 drwxrwxrwx 2 root wheel160 Mar 21 02:09 . drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 13660 Mar 22 19:19 .. crwxrwxrwx 1 root audio 14, 12 Mar 21 02:09 adsp crwxrwxrwx 1 root audio 14, 4 Mar 21 02:09 audio crwxrwxrwx 1 root audio 14, 3 Mar 21 02:09 dsp crwxrwxrwx 1 root audio 14, 0 Mar 21 02:09 mixer crwxrwxrwx 1 root audio 14, 1 Mar 21 02:09 sequencer crwxrwxrwx 1 root audio 14, 8 Mar 21 02:09 sequencer2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -l /dev/dsp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 21 02:09 /dev/dsp - sound/dsp [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ id uid=1000(ernie) gid=100(users) groups=10(wheel),12(mail),16(cron),18(audio),35 (games),100(users),250(portage),440(scanner),500(webmaster) I'm confused. As you can see I've been playing with permissions and haven't cleaned everything up BUT, I can't see why user ernie can't play audio in .swf files. It looks to me that firefox isn't looking in the right places for the plug-in. -- Regards, Ernie -- Regards, Ernie -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Question re: profiles
Colleen Beamer wrote: Dale wrote: Colleen Beamer wrote: Is it safe to remove older profiles? Regards, Colleen I think the profiles are updated when you sync, which is why you got that error message. This is true. You may want to either sync again or run emerge --metadata one. I seem to recall running into this and it can't update the database without that link being correct. The metadata part should fix it. Not necessary. I just recreated the symlink to point to the correct profile. Not rocket science, even for someone like me who does not have a formal computer education. :-) Thanks for your response. Regards, Colleen. I guess some changes have been made to portage. When I ran into this a while back, it error'd out right after the sync process. I had to create the new link the run emerge --metadata so that it could finish processing the database which I guess is part two. Anyway, glad all is well. Dale :-) :-) :-) :-) -- www.myspace.com/-remove-me-dalek1967 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Seamonkey, Linux and bank websites.
Hi, I'm hoping someone can explain this to me and maybe even offer a workaround. This may only apply to us U.S. folks. Banks and credit card company are in the process of changing the way you log into a website. It registers your computer when you sign up as a security feature. Problem is, this doesn't work with Linux and I suspect it doesn't work on a Mac either. I'm not sure, nor can I find out, what it uses to register my computer. It may be a CPU serial number or something like that. I also don't know if this is Linux or the web browser, I use Seamonkey. I plan to test a theory at my brothers that uses winders XP and Seamonkey to see if it works up there. Does anybody have a clue if this is Linux itself, the browser or a combination of both? I'm not buying and installing winders either. LOL I may close my account and go back to cash but I'm not using winders. If you go here, https://www.mycardstatement.com/ and click on the link for read more it will let you download a .pdf file. It gives a little more info. Any ideas?? Am I cooked? Thanks Dale :D :D :D :D -- www.myspace.com/-remove-me-dalek1967 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
