Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to create nessus-bin-3.2.0 ebuild
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Mike Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've taken a slightly different route, going for the debian package. Instead of looking for an eclass to handle the conversion i just did it manually with deb2targz. Handley debian has openssl-0.9.8, so the dependancies are correct without having to resort to ugly symlinks, although nessusd does complain about no version information available in libssl and libcrypto. Oh' thanks a lot for the information. nessus from suse10 does not starts at all for me. -- Vladimir Rusinov Voronezh, Russia UNIX Admin @ Murano Software
[gentoo-user] some OSS software that enable me make call to traditional telephone by using Internet?
Dear all I wish to be able to make telephone call from Internet to Traditional telephone, like I did with skyp out. But I am using Linux on ppc, and skype did not release ppc binary. Is there a solution for people like me? I think if there are OSS solutions they are preferable because then it tends to be able to compile on any kind of hardware. Actually any solution (including binary-release software) are fine for me, as long as they can run on Linux/ppc. Best regards -- Real Softservice Huateng Tower, Unit 1788 Jia 302 3rd area of Jinsong, Chao Yang Tel: +86 (10) 8773 0650 ext 603 Mobile: 135 9950 2413 http://www.realss.com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] some OSS software that enable me make call to traditional telephone by using Internet?
You can try ekiga http://ekiga.org/ and openwengohttp://www.openwengo.org/, both can call to regular or cell phones, read FAQ of both sites for details.
Re: [gentoo-user] CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m I don't want modules here.
Am Freitag, 21. März 2008 schrieb Dale: What is this and why is it so persistent about it having to be there? Because of: config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN tristate default m depends on SCSI depends on MODULES in drivers/scsi/Kconfig. HTH... Dirk signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] iTunes with Gentoo?
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 17:39 -0700, Joshua D Doll wrote: Florian Philipp wrote: On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 10:11 -0700, Joshua D Doll wrote: Michael Schmarck wrote: Hello. Sorry for being somewhat Off Topic, but could you guys please tell me if it's possible to use iTunes with wine-0.9.57 under a ~x86 system? Is it possible to change the store location to something other than US (as that's required to buy songs, as far as I know)? Thanks, Michael iTunes works pretty well, running on a VM of windows. I run windows XP with VMWare Workstation and have iTunes installed to sync my iPod, because no OSS solutions handle m4a very well :-(. --Joshua Doll But you have no way to burn an audio-cd from it and thus get rid of drm, right? I've burned a copy of CDs from within the VM, but not using iTunes. I personally don't have very many DRM'd music, like I said I just use it to transfer m4a (apple lossless which is not DRM'd) files to my iPod. --Joshua Doll Oh, that interests me: Which VM enables you to actually burn CDs? I tried Qemu once and were told at that time that there is no VM with CD-burning functionality. Did you actually burn it from within the VM, e.g. having that much control over your hardware or did you create an image you later burned with native linux tools? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-user] CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m I don't want modules here.
Stroller wrote: On 22 Mar 2008, at 01:08, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:23:11 +, Stroller wrote: I suspect that this is caused because CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN depends upon some other kernel option, and because you have that compiled in as a module. Thus the dependencies of the parent are forced to be modular. I thought Dale said that he hadn't anything set to compile as a module. He doesn't seem to specifically state that. He does (subsequently?) say that he doesn't _want_ anything as a module (beware teh dark side!), but that's not the same thing. As I read Dale's original post, all he says is I set CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN as `not set` (and in his post of 21 March 2008 16:13:49 GMT he says if I say `compile it in') and it keeps turning back into a module. Of course this would prolly be much easier if Dale just posted a copy of his .config. I have a feeling something obvious is being overlooked, and it wouldn't do any hard to post the output of `cd /usr/src/linux ls -ld /usr/src/linux md5sum .config make make modules_install` so we can see stuff for ourselves. You'll notice that I look to check things like the /usr/src/linux symlink here and that the .config used is actually the same one as I suggest he posts. Stroller. True, you may have to read between the lines but I do not have any modules with the exception of nvidia. I have to have my picture on the screen so I can surf the www. LOL I attached a copy of my config for you to look at. I have not changed the symlink yet because I have not actually booted the new kernel yet. This is what I get after trying to make a kernel: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/linux-2.6.24-gentoo-r3 # make all make modules_install CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK include/linux/compile.h Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#3) The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled. make: *** [modules_install] Error 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/linux-2.6.24-gentoo-r3 # I suspect that I can leave off the make modules_install since there *should* not be any. It also says it makes the kernel itself. I'm just curious if my nvidia drivers will load without the loadable modules option there?? My wish list, the ability to compile in loadable module support into the kernel and whatever else it has to have with it. Back to nothing being a module except nvidia. If I can't have it that way, I guess I'll have a extra module. Of course, then something else will likely creep in the list too. ;-) I hope the extra info helps. Thanks. Dale :-) :-) # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.24-gentoo-r3 # Fri Mar 21 10:36:11 2008 # # CONFIG_64BIT is not set CONFIG_X86_32=y # CONFIG_X86_64 is not set CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST=y CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_SEMAPHORE_SLEEPERS=y CONFIG_MMU=y CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=y CONFIG_QUICKLIST=y CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=y CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG=y CONFIG_GENERIC_HWEIGHT=y CONFIG_ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC=y CONFIG_DMI=y # CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK is not set CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y # CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U32 is not set # CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U64 is not set CONFIG_GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY=y # CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL is not set CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPROFILE=y # CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is not set CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP=y # CONFIG_AUDIT_ARCH is not set CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS=y CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE=y CONFIG_X86_BIOS_REBOOT=y CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR=y CONFIG_DEFCONFIG_LIST=/lib/modules/$UNAME_RELEASE/.config # # General setup # CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP=y CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y CONFIG_INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT=32 CONFIG_LOCALVERSION= # CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is not set CONFIG_SWAP=y CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y CONFIG_SYSVIPC_SYSCTL=y CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE=y # CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT is not set # CONFIG_TASKSTATS is not set # CONFIG_USER_NS is not set # CONFIG_PID_NS is not set # CONFIG_AUDIT is not set CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=14 # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED=y # CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED is not set # CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is not set # CONFIG_RELAY is not set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE= CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y CONFIG_SYSCTL=y # CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not set CONFIG_UID16=y CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL=y CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y # CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y CONFIG_PRINTK=y CONFIG_BUG=y CONFIG_ELF_CORE=y CONFIG_BASE_FULL=y CONFIG_FUTEX=y CONFIG_ANON_INODES=y CONFIG_EPOLL=y CONFIG_SIGNALFD=y CONFIG_EVENTFD=y CONFIG_SHMEM=y CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS=y
Re: [gentoo-user] CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m I don't want modules here.
Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Am Freitag, 21. März 2008 schrieb Dale: What is this and why is it so persistent about it having to be there? Because of: config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN tristate default m depends on SCSI depends on MODULES in drivers/scsi/Kconfig. HTH... Dirk Oh, so I need to smack someone for forcing me to have modules when I don't want any? What if this was a critical system and for security reasons modules were not wanted? Then what? It's forced on them anyway? This is not a critical system tho. Just my desktop rig. Just curious. It just seems weird to me. Linux is about choice right? Thanks Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Power supply or motherboard dead?
A Gentoo desktop of mine won't turn on anymore. I was hoping it was the power supply but I've installed a new one which doesn't fix the problem. Is there a sure way to know if the motherboard needs replacement or if I have two dead power supplies? Hi there, I work on PCs for a living, mostly peoples' home computers, and in the case of a dead pc the cause is nearly as often something else as it is a dead PSU. Causes such as a duff CD-ROM drive or a damaged USB connector are surprising but not uncommon, so reset the BIOS (using the method described by Volker) and if that doesn't work unplug as much as possible from the motherboard - you'll surely need the CPU RAM for it to post, but you may wish to swap out the RAM at some point in your diagnostics - and unplug most everything else. That means drives, PCI cards, USB devices, stuff connected to the USB serial headers, graphics card if possible. Also don't connect the power supply to any of the drives, or anything else that you're not currently using. I've seen cheap power supplies take out the motherboard when they go. Sorry if you find that to be the case. I removed everything from the motherboard and even tried another CPU that used to run on that same motherboard. No luck. I can't test the power supply in my P3 router because the CPU power plug is different. I should have said before that every couple times I try to turn it on, the CPU fan spins about 2% of a full rotation and some of the LEDs along the back light up for a second. Would you guys say it is most likely the motherboard at this point? - Grant -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say this is an Emachines PC. Am I right? Not Emachine actually. I built it about 1.5 years ago with parts from the lowest bidder. - Grant Emachines, when the PSU goes bad, have a habit of taking out the motherboard, too. Hooking the old PSU up to a new motherboard fries the new one. I fried 2 motherboards (not Emachines supplied) back in my early days doing this (PSU wasn't Emachines, either). So, it can happen with other PSU/motherboards. If the motherboard has a status light and it isn't even coming on, then the motherboard is dead. Even bad CPUs I've damaged still allowed the motherboard, fans, etc. to power up (though nothing came up on the screen). Good info, thanks Mark. - Grant - Mark Shields -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys think? - Grant -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 10:07 -0700, Grant wrote: I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys think? - Grant I work at the German Aerospace Center (basically the German NASA). We've been using AMD CPUs for a long time on our clusters and workstations because they were not only cheaper but also faster on floating point operations whereas Intel was faster on integer operations. Now we are switching to Intel because AMD lost this advantage and has problems delivering the ordered number of CPUs. I personally stick with AMD because they have a factory in Germany and I don't want Intel to rule the market as they've done before AMD came up with the Athlon XP. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
Grant schrieb: I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys think? - Grant Well the experience of a desktop or an application depends on more than just the processor. Nearly every part of a computer does its part. And then you have the software, what software you use, how it is build, what reqirements this software has on other software and hardware and so on. Does it uses the FPU or is it heavy on the ALU. How much IO is used and how much can the system provide. But if you believe the average hardwaremagazine, intel is a step ahead right now. Norman -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
Florian Philipp schrieb: On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 10:07 -0700, Grant wrote: I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys think? - Grant I work at the German Aerospace Center (basically the German NASA). We've been using AMD CPUs for a long time on our clusters and workstations because they were not only cheaper but also faster on floating point operations whereas Intel was faster on integer operations. Now we are switching to Intel because AMD lost this advantage and has problems delivering the ordered number of CPUs. I personally stick with AMD because they have a factory in Germany and I don't want Intel to rule the market as they've done before AMD came up with the Athlon XP. I can confirm that. The German Weather Service uses AMD CPU's on the servers for visualising weathercharts due to better FPU performance. The new bunch of servers however are intel systems. Norman -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 18:44 +0100, Norman Rieß wrote: Grant schrieb: I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys think? - Grant Well the experience of a desktop or an application depends on more than just the processor. Nearly every part of a computer does its part. And then you have the software, what software you use, how it is build, what reqirements this software has on other software and hardware and so on. Does it uses the FPU or is it heavy on the ALU. How much IO is used and how much can the system provide. But if you believe the average hardwaremagazine, intel is a step ahead right now. Norman When Intel finally implements HyperTransport (I think it's planned for the next generation), AMD will loose their last bastion performance wise ... what a pity. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
On Samstag, 22. März 2008, Grant wrote: I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys think? price/performance still favours AMD. Also, without even knowing your hardware, it is really hard to say why your laptop is faster or your desktop slower. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
Grant schrieb: I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys think? - Grant Well the experience of a desktop or an application depends on more than just the processor. Nearly every part of a computer does its part. And then you have the software, what software you use, how it is build, what reqirements this software has on other software and hardware and so on. Does it uses the FPU or is it heavy on the ALU. How much IO is used and how much can the system provide. But if you believe the average hardwaremagazine, intel is a step ahead right now. Norman When Intel finally implements HyperTransport (I think it's planned for the next generation), AMD will loose their last bastion performance wise ... what a pity. It is a pity. When did AMD's overall advantage disappear? - Grant With the arrival of the Core CPU's. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys think? - Grant Well the experience of a desktop or an application depends on more than just the processor. Nearly every part of a computer does its part. And then you have the software, what software you use, how it is build, what reqirements this software has on other software and hardware and so on. Does it uses the FPU or is it heavy on the ALU. How much IO is used and how much can the system provide. But if you believe the average hardwaremagazine, intel is a step ahead right now. Norman When Intel finally implements HyperTransport (I think it's planned for the next generation), AMD will loose their last bastion performance wise ... what a pity. It is a pity. When did AMD's overall advantage disappear? - Grant -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys think? - Grant Well the experience of a desktop or an application depends on more than just the processor. Nearly every part of a computer does its part. And then you have the software, what software you use, how it is build, what reqirements this software has on other software and hardware and so on. Does it uses the FPU or is it heavy on the ALU. How much IO is used and how much can the system provide. But if you believe the average hardwaremagazine, intel is a step ahead right now. Norman When Intel finally implements HyperTransport (I think it's planned for the next generation), AMD will loose their last bastion performance wise ... what a pity. It is a pity. When did AMD's overall advantage disappear? - Grant When Intel came out with its Core Two Duo CPUs, and *really* when Intel came out with Quad Cores before AMD. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
Norman Rieß norman at smash-net.org writes: It is a pity. When did AMD's overall advantage disappear? With the arrival of the Core CPU's. When/if AMD is able to complete their new architecture, integrating video processors with 64 bit processors they might become competitive on a cost/performance basis. Certainly with AMD open sourcing new video driver development, they still have a v very strong appeal to open sources users. HIGH end technical clusters and the processors they use are different needs than the average small business or consumer, which needs robust support for open source video and applications. If everyone runs to Intel, we'll all be *very sorry* in a few years... The ultimate questions is do you really make a purchase decision base strictly on extreme benchmark results, or do you stand by your vendor, as they regroup and keep things competitive? Remember Intel has been just as evil as Redmond particular in matters related to DeCSS and video on computer issues, IMHO. AMD is my soul_mate(particularly since they are open sourcing new ATI video drivers...) James -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Power supply or motherboard dead?
Grant wrote: A Gentoo desktop of mine won't turn on anymore. I was hoping it was the power supply but I've installed a new one which doesn't fix the problem. Is there a sure way to know if the motherboard needs replacement or if I have two dead power supplies? As strange as this may sound, we had a server go down and we thought psu/mb. it turned out to be the cmos battery. We replaced it (about four years ago), the server has been flawless since. -- Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO) Cranbrook, B.C. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m I don't want modules here.
Am Samstag, 22. März 2008 schrieb Dale: It just seems weird to me. Linux is about choice right? Feel free to file a bug on kernel.org. They'll either fix it or eventually explain why it is as it is. Bye... Dirk signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:34:57 + (UTC) James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AMD is my soul_mate(particularly since they are open sourcing new ATI video drivers...) As far as I know, and unless something changed, that's inaccurate. They haven't released any code at all. They have released *some* specifications for some graphics chips. They started releasing the register specs for some cards. Recently, they released the 3d specs, only for r500 chips as far as I know. It's better than nothing of course... But it far far far from open sourcing the drivers or releasing the whole specifications for every card. I would be glad to be wrong though. I must admit that I don't follow too closely the thing, so, any info to probe me wrong is more than welcome. Regards. -- Jesús Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] unixODBC econf failure
Hello,
After updating gnutls revdep-rebuild would like to update an awfull lot
of packages, including unixODBC. So far no problem but unixODBC does not
compile. After a while it comes up with the following error message:
...
checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name...
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
!!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
!!!
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12/work/unixODBC-2.2.12/gODBCConfig/config.log
*
* ERROR: dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile
* environment, line 2622: Called econf 'src_compile'
'src_compile' '--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
'--with-odbc=/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12/work/unixODBC-2.2.12'
'--enable-static'
* ebuild.sh, line 513: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* die econf failed
* The die message:
* econf failed
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack
if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12/temp/environment'.
*
...
The following gcc is installed:
sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 USE=doc fortran gcj gtk ip28 ip32r10k mudflap
multislot nls objc objc++ objc-gc (-altivec) -bootstrap -build -d
(-hardened) -libffi (-multilib) (-n32) (-n64) -nocxx -test -vanilla
Some information about the system:
CPU: Intel P4D Processor Family 15
Gentoo: AMD64
CFLAGS=-march=nocona -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
Kernel: gentoo 2.6.24-r3
If any further information is needed to solve the problem i'll be glad
to provide it. Thank you a lot in advance.
cu
Max
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. AMD has had better engineers than Intel all the time. Intel just had the money. A few years ago the CIO from Intel advised engineers to be more creative. So AMD will stay ahead of the pack and if they find the right way (actually they're going the right way - open specifications) the competition is going on. I hope that nVidia won't acquire AMD. In fact atm. there is no measurable performance difference weather in IU nor in FPU operations, however AMD has a better performance/price. In HPCs AMD beats Intel because they don't use obsolete FSB. I am looking forward to the new CPU architecture where GPU and CPU find together. I am using Intel technology because chipset, wlan, bluetooth and so on are working great together, although there is no HypterTransport. Intel is going to follow AMD because they have the money. Regards, acm. PS: Greets to the German Aerospace Center in Neustrelitz and it's networking department. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH5WLtYCx19pTB5PERAjPiAJ9UYjy1frSb0c+tnxwPZR2ujyOcnQCcDgkM GWM4vRk629A1IBNEBPyBWs8= =eGMg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] unixODBC econf failure
On Saturday 22 March 2008, Max wrote:
Hello,
After updating gnutls revdep-rebuild would like to update an awfull
lot of packages, including unixODBC. So far no problem but unixODBC
does not compile. After a while it comes up with the following error
message:
shameless crib of request for more info from the forums
Please post the output of emerge --info.
Have you changed any of CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, CHOST or LDFLAGS
in /etc/make.conf recently? Have you changed your profile recently?
Have you upgraded or unmerged ay version of GCC recently? If so, what
was the old value/version and what is the current value/version?
/shameless crib
also please post 'gcc-config -l'
...
checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name...
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
!!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
!!!
/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12/work/unixODBC-2.2.12/gODBCCon
fig/config.log *
* ERROR: dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile
* environment, line 2622: Called econf 'src_compile'
'src_compile' '--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
'--with-odbc=/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12/work/unixODBC-2.
2.12' '--enable-static' * ebuild.sh, line 513: Called
die
* The specific snippet of code:
*die econf failed
* The die message:
* econf failed
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
stack if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/unixODBC-2.2.12/temp/environment'.
*
...
The following gcc is installed:
sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 USE=doc fortran gcj gtk ip28 ip32r10k mudflap
multislot nls objc objc++ objc-gc (-altivec) -bootstrap -build -d
(-hardened) -libffi (-multilib) (-n32) (-n64) -nocxx -test -vanilla
Some information about the system:
CPU: Intel P4D Processor Family 15
Gentoo: AMD64
CFLAGS=-march=nocona -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
Kernel: gentoo 2.6.24-r3
If any further information is needed to solve the problem i'll be
glad to provide it. Thank you a lot in advance.
cu
Max
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Power supply or motherboard dead?
A Gentoo desktop of mine won't turn on anymore. I was hoping it was the power supply but I've installed a new one which doesn't fix the problem. Is there a sure way to know if the motherboard needs replacement or if I have two dead power supplies? As strange as this may sound, we had a server go down and we thought psu/mb. it turned out to be the cmos battery. We replaced it (about four years ago), the server has been flawless since. Different motherboards must exhibit different behavior with a bad CMOS battery. Another desktop of mine prints an error to the POST screen about its bad battery. There is a comment here from another owner of my MSI motherboard: http://www.ebuyer.com/product/127597/show_product_reviews This is a great board too, except i got an error each boot-turns out the battery was dead, swapped it and it was ok It sounds like my motherboard should still boot with a bad battery. - Grant Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO) -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Power supply or motherboard dead?
Grant wrote: A Gentoo desktop of mine won't turn on anymore. I was hoping it was the power supply but I've installed a new one which doesn't fix the problem. Is there a sure way to know if the motherboard needs replacement or if I have two dead power supplies? As strange as this may sound, we had a server go down and we thought psu/mb. it turned out to be the cmos battery. We replaced it (about four years ago), the server has been flawless since. Different motherboards must exhibit different behavior with a bad CMOS battery. Another desktop of mine prints an error to the POST screen about its bad battery. There is a comment here from another owner of my MSI motherboard: http://www.ebuyer.com/product/127597/show_product_reviews This is a great board too, except i got an error each boot-turns out the battery was dead, swapped it and it was ok It sounds like my motherboard should still boot with a bad battery. - Grant Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO) I had one with a dead battery too. It lost all the settings and the clock reset back to 1971 or something like that but otherwise it worked just fine. Well, after getting it to see the drives again. Weird things happen I guess. Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] nVidia GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x - tainted driver 96.43.05 causes X crash sig 11 - Kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r3
Last week I upgraded the kernel on one of my 5 year old Pentium 4 desktop machines to 2.6.24-gentoo-r3. Kernel compilation went fine as usual but when I tried to emerge the current (x86) binary nVidia driver [96.43.01] for its GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x graphics card it failed with an error message that the it couldn't determine the kernel version. The graphics card is around 5-7 years old and won't run on later 1xx.xx.xx versions of the binary blob, so I'd masked the driver to: /etc/portage/package.mask/nvidia-drivers =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-97.00.00 == The driver worked fine on the previous kernel 2.6.23-gentoo-r9. The solution was to do what I've always done for binary blobs (nvidia,ati,madwifi-ng etc) and add: /etc/portage/package.keywords x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers ~86 == This allowed me to go from 96.43.01 to 96.43.05. Unfortunately, even though the driver compiled fine and started without error this driver proved to be unstable on my machine and graphics hardware. X (1.3.0-r5) failed on KDE logout with: /etc/var/log/Xorg.0.log: Backtrace: 0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x85) [0x80c7c57] 1: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//nvidia_drv.so(_nv001216X+0xe5) [0xb71d6711] 2: [0x1] Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting === Maybe running the uvesafb framebuffer and fbcondecor (livecd-2007.0 theme) has something to do with the sigsegv problems on just this particular driver version but I knew that I couldn't run this driver. I did a bit of research and found an ugly hack to get the 96.43.01 driver working on kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r3 so I changed the mask to: /etc/portage/package.mask/nvidia-drivers x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-96.43.01 = I then worked the dark magic: # ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm-x86 /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386 (/usr/src/linux points to the new kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r3) == I reemerged nvidia-drivers and the hack worked. I got the reliable 96.43.01 driver working again, though with some concerns about future reliability. There might be other changes within the kernel 2.6.24 that driver 96.43.01 doesn't know about that could cause me some grief in the future, but for now it works fine. Now a week later I find that portage has released the nvidia binary driver 96.43.05 as stable on x86. I allowed it to emerge, but it still had the X killing problem when logging out of KDE. Some of the things I've read suggest nvidia have been informed of this specific problem but I was wondering if there's any more information around about this issue? I know the card is getting old and perhaps I should use the open nv driver, but the card usually works really well with the binary blob. I would also like to know if these problems were known to the Gentoo devs when they released 96.43.05 as stable on x86. -- Regards, Gregory. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Slim DM and shutdown
Hi, I am running the display manager slim and I would like to know if it is possible to get a reboot/shutdown button instead of typing 'halt' as the login and the root password. Perhaps with a custom theme ? Thks, Gal' -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: price/performance still favours AMD. How on earth do you justify that statement? I am an AMD fan and have been since the 486/133 (was a Cyrix fan before then) but I can certainly tell you that the performance of the Intel Q6600 makes the AMD Phenom 7600 look decidedly pathetic and the Intel is cheaper - at least where I shop. I have both so I am talking from practical experience. I have an AMD Phenom 7500 sitting on the floor behind me which isn't even worth sticking in a motherboard. Another Intel Q6600 arrives on Tuesday. I really hope AMD get their lead back but they are struggling at the moment. :( Be lucky, Neil -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Gentoo router: Conntrack table full
Hi folks, Today I had some really serious problems with my Gentoo router. I could ping it, and all the network connections were in place and functional, but no outside access. I looked into it and found that the syslog was flooded with this: Mar 22 21:25:55 localhost kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. Mar 22 21:26:00 localhost kernel: printk: 11 messages suppressed. Mar 22 21:26:00 localhost kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. Mar 22 21:26:05 localhost kernel: printk: 16 messages suppressed. These messages spanned a full 20 hours of the log. I understand that conntrack is the connection tracking system that iptables uses. I also understand that its maximum is something on the order of 65000 simultaneous connections. For a simple home network, I think we can agree that I would probably never approach this number of connections with normal use. So my question is this: what could have caused the router's connection tracker to overflow? -- Dan Cowsill http://www.danthehat.net -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo router: Conntrack table full
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Dan Cowsill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, Today I had some really serious problems with my Gentoo router. I could ping it, and all the network connections were in place and functional, but no outside access. I looked into it and found that the syslog was flooded with this: Mar 22 21:25:55 localhost kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. Mar 22 21:26:00 localhost kernel: printk: 11 messages suppressed. Mar 22 21:26:00 localhost kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. Mar 22 21:26:05 localhost kernel: printk: 16 messages suppressed. These messages spanned a full 20 hours of the log. I understand that conntrack is the connection tracking system that iptables uses. I also understand that its maximum is something on the order of 65000 simultaneous connections. For a simple home network, I think we can agree that I would probably never approach this number of connections with normal use. So my question is this: what could have caused the router's connection tracker to overflow? -- Dan Cowsill http://www.danthehat.net -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list What type of 'net services do you run between your home network and the outside? Is there a possibility that someone out have put a denial of service attack on you? -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo router: Conntrack table full
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Dan Cowsill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, Today I had some really serious problems with my Gentoo router. I could ping it, and all the network connections were in place and functional, but no outside access. I looked into it and found that the syslog was flooded with this: Mar 22 21:25:55 localhost kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. Mar 22 21:26:00 localhost kernel: printk: 11 messages suppressed. Mar 22 21:26:00 localhost kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. Mar 22 21:26:05 localhost kernel: printk: 16 messages suppressed. These messages spanned a full 20 hours of the log. I understand that conntrack is the connection tracking system that iptables uses. I also understand that its maximum is something on the order of 65000 simultaneous connections. For a simple home network, I think we can agree that I would probably never approach this number of connections with normal use. So my question is this: what could have caused the router's connection tracker to overflow? -- Dan Cowsill http://www.danthehat.net -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list What type of 'net services do you run between your home network and the outside? Is there a possibility that someone out have put a denial of service attack on you? -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list I have SSH to a server, two open ports for bit torrent connections and a few ranges for DCC transfers from irc. The possibility of a DoS attack is pretty real, I imagine. Is there any way I could be sure? -- Dan Cowsill http://www.danthehat.net -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
