Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-16 Thread Mike Diehl
Well, I got it to boot.  Now that it's up, I can see what the problem was/is.  
There are no disk device files in /dev.

I created the appropriate nodes and things went much better.

The problem was that CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 was on

I just closed up the chassis and it will ship in the morning.

Thank you for your help!

Mike.

On Friday 15 October 2010 3:02:27 pm Florian Philipp wrote:
 Am 15.10.2010 21:23, schrieb Mike Diehl:
  On Friday 15 October 2010 11:40:34 am Florian Philipp wrote:
  Am 15.10.2010 19:29, schrieb Mike Diehl:
  Hi all.
  
  I've never had this much trouble with a server before, but I've been
  pulling my hair out.
  
  The install seemed to go well, but when I rebooted it from it's own
  hard drive, it fails.  fsck claims that it can't open /dev/sda3 or
  that the superblock doesn't describe a valid ext2 filesystem.
  
  *All* of the drivers could be too much. There is a generic driver which
  can prevent the right driver from taking over. In that case you end up
  with a /dev/hda node and no DMA. Try to deactivate Generic ATA support
  = CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC and generic/default IDE chipset support =
  CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC.
  I think it is the second option that causes that problem. However, you
  won't need the first option, either.
  
  I tried this, first without success.  I then ran through all combinations
  of sda3, sdb3, hda3, hdb3 in /etc/fstab.  This didn't work.
  
  Instead of your brute-force yes to all approach, newer kernels also
  support `make localyesconfig` which takes all modules currently used in
  the running kernel and compiles them into the new kernel. It is very
  helpful when you already have a good but generic kernel like the one on
  your live CD.
  
  I tried this, next.  At least now, I believe I have a viable kernel.  But
  it still didn't work.
  
  If even that doesn't help, it might be possible that the device
  numbering has changed and your hard disk is detected as /dev/sdb or so.
  Try mounting it by UUID (google for it, please).
  
  I tried this.  Only now, fsck.ext2 tells me that it can't resolve the
  UUID.
  
  Here is the new fstab:
  /dev/sda1   /boot   ext2noauto,noatime  1 2
  
  UUID=ba7511dd-a5f9-48d8-8102-cf71c08a0c7b /   ext2noatime   
  0 1
  
  /dev/sda2   noneswapsw  0 0
  /dev/cdrom  /mnt/cdrom  autonoauto,ro   0
  0
  
  At this point, I'm going to move the drive to a different port on the
  SATA chain; shouldn't change anything, but I'm running out of ideas. 
  I'll also check the BIOS for anything stupid-obvious.
  
  So, I guess I'm still stuck!
 
 Hmm, sounds like a serious problem. I suggest you try to get into an
 early stage during boot and try to move forward from there. Try to add
 '1' to the parameters in order to get into single-user mode. You can
 also try 'init=/bin/bash'.
 
 There are lots of other options you can try. For a long time, 'noapic'
 (not 'noapci') was my first candidate for odd boot issues. Take a look
 at /usr/sr/linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt for more options.
 
 Also, which kernel sources are you using and which live CD (with which
 kernel version)?  Is there a specific reason why you use ext2 for root?
 What kind of system do you run, anyway? And, just by chance, you are not
 using an extremely large (1TB) drive which might happen to have 4kB
 blocks instead of 512 B?
 
 Regards,
 Florian Philipp

-- 

Take care and have fun,
Mike Diehl.



[gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Mike Diehl
Hi all.

I've never had this much trouble with a server before, but I've been pulling 
my hair out.

The install seemed to go well, but when I rebooted it from it's own hard 
drive, it fails.  fsck claims that it can't open /dev/sda3 or that the 
superblock doesn't describe a valid ext2 filesystem.

However, when I reboot from the live CD, it mounts just fine and fsck says 
it's clean.

Here is the /etc/fstab:
/dev/sda1   /boot   ext2noauto,noatime  1 2
/dev/sda3   /   ext2noatime 0 1
/dev/sda2   noneswapsw  0 0
/dev/cdrom  /mnt/cdrom  autonoauto,ro   0 0
shm /dev/shmtmpfs   nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0

Here is the /boot/grub/grub.conf file:
default 0
timeout 30
splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz

title Gentoo Linux 
root (hd0,0)
kernel /bzImage root=/dev/sda3

I've verified that ext2 and ext3 are in the kernel statically.  I've also 
compiled in ALL of the SATA drivers, statically.

What am I missing?

-- 

Take care and have fun,
Mike Diehl.



Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 15.10.2010 19:29, schrieb Mike Diehl:
 Hi all.
 
 I've never had this much trouble with a server before, but I've been pulling 
 my hair out.
 
 The install seemed to go well, but when I rebooted it from it's own hard 
 drive, it fails.  fsck claims that it can't open /dev/sda3 or that the 
 superblock doesn't describe a valid ext2 filesystem.
 
 However, when I reboot from the live CD, it mounts just fine and fsck says 
 it's clean.
 
 Here is the /etc/fstab:
 /dev/sda1   /boot   ext2noauto,noatime  1 2
 /dev/sda3   /   ext2noatime 0 1
 /dev/sda2   noneswapsw  0 0
 /dev/cdrom  /mnt/cdrom  autonoauto,ro   0 0
 shm /dev/shmtmpfs   nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
 
 Here is the /boot/grub/grub.conf file:
 default 0
 timeout 30
 splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
 
 title Gentoo Linux 
 root (hd0,0)
 kernel /bzImage root=/dev/sda3
 
 I've verified that ext2 and ext3 are in the kernel statically.  I've also 
 compiled in ALL of the SATA drivers, statically.
 
 What am I missing?
 

*All* of the drivers could be too much. There is a generic driver which
can prevent the right driver from taking over. In that case you end up
with a /dev/hda node and no DMA. Try to deactivate Generic ATA support
= CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC and generic/default IDE chipset support =
CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC.

I think it is the second option that causes that problem. However, you
won't need the first option, either.

Instead of your brute-force yes to all approach, newer kernels also
support `make localyesconfig` which takes all modules currently used in
the running kernel and compiles them into the new kernel. It is very
helpful when you already have a good but generic kernel like the one on
your live CD.

If even that doesn't help, it might be possible that the device
numbering has changed and your hard disk is detected as /dev/sdb or so.
Try mounting it by UUID (google for it, please).

Hope this helps,
Florian Philipp



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Mike Diehl
On Friday 15 October 2010 11:40:34 am Florian Philipp wrote:

 
 *All* of the drivers could be too much. There is a generic driver which
 can prevent the right driver from taking over. In that case you end up
 with a /dev/hda node and no DMA. Try to deactivate Generic ATA support
 = CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC and generic/default IDE chipset support =
 CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC.

I will try this.

 I think it is the second option that causes that problem. However, you
 won't need the first option, either.

Ya, I don't like having EVERYTHING in the kernel, but nothing else was 
working, so I figured I'd give it a try.
 
 Instead of your brute-force yes to all approach, newer kernels also
 support `make localyesconfig` which takes all modules currently used in
 the running kernel and compiles them into the new kernel. It is very
 helpful when you already have a good but generic kernel like the one on
 your live CD.

Oh now this is cool.  Thank you.  I'll try this, also.

 If even that doesn't help, it might be possible that the device
 numbering has changed and your hard disk is detected as /dev/sdb or so.
 Try mounting it by UUID (google for it, please).

I've tried changing grub to point to sdb and hda.  Perhaps, I need to change 
etc/fstab...

Thank you.

 Hope this helps,
 Florian Philipp

-- 

Take care and have fun,
Mike Diehl.



Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Dan Cowsill
On 15/10/2010 10:47 AM, Mike Diehl wrote:
 On Friday 15 October 2010 11:40:34 am Florian Philipp wrote:
 Instead of your brute-force yes to all approach, newer kernels also
 support `make localyesconfig` which takes all modules currently used in
 the running kernel and compiles them into the new kernel. It is very
 helpful when you already have a good but generic kernel like the one on
 your live CD.
 
 Oh now this is cool.  Thank you.  I'll try this, also.
 

I agree, that is pretty cool!

My two cents:  Don't discount the possibility of hardware failure.  Is
the device new, or old?  Have you kept an eye on the SMART attributes of
the device?

Cheers,
D




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Per-Erik Westerberg
fre 2010-10-15 klockan 11:29 -0600 skrev Mike Diehl:
 Hi all.
 
 I've never had this much trouble with a server before, but I've been pulling 
 my hair out.
 
 The install seemed to go well, but when I rebooted it from it's own hard 
 drive, it fails.  fsck claims that it can't open /dev/sda3 or that the 
 superblock doesn't describe a valid ext2 filesystem.
 
 However, when I reboot from the live CD, it mounts just fine and fsck says 
 it's clean.
 
 Here is the /etc/fstab:
 /dev/sda1   /boot   ext2noauto,noatime  1 2
 /dev/sda3   /   ext2noatime 0 1
 /dev/sda2   noneswapsw  0 0
 /dev/cdrom  /mnt/cdrom  autonoauto,ro   0 0
 shm /dev/shmtmpfs   nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
 
 Here is the /boot/grub/grub.conf file:
 default 0
 timeout 30
 splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
 
 title Gentoo Linux 
 root (hd0,0)
 kernel /bzImage root=/dev/sda3
 
 I've verified that ext2 and ext3 are in the kernel statically.  I've also 
 compiled in ALL of the SATA drivers, statically.
 
 What am I missing?
 

Hi,

I had exactly the same problem when I did a reinstall, I used the kernel
.config I got from the live CD (zcat /proc/config.gz  .config) as a
base when configuring the kernel. I solved it by not using that and
instead start from scratch without an initial .config. I guess that
there were some options that was conflicting.

  BR / P-E





Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Mike Diehl
On Friday 15 October 2010 11:40:34 am Florian Philipp wrote:
 Am 15.10.2010 19:29, schrieb Mike Diehl:
  Hi all.
  
  I've never had this much trouble with a server before, but I've been
  pulling my hair out.
  
  The install seemed to go well, but when I rebooted it from it's own hard
  drive, it fails.  fsck claims that it can't open /dev/sda3 or that the
  superblock doesn't describe a valid ext2 filesystem.

 *All* of the drivers could be too much. There is a generic driver which
 can prevent the right driver from taking over. In that case you end up
 with a /dev/hda node and no DMA. Try to deactivate Generic ATA support
 = CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC and generic/default IDE chipset support =
 CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC.
 I think it is the second option that causes that problem. However, you
 won't need the first option, either.

I tried this, first without success.  I then ran through all combinations of 
sda3, sdb3, hda3, hdb3 in /etc/fstab.  This didn't work.

 Instead of your brute-force yes to all approach, newer kernels also
 support `make localyesconfig` which takes all modules currently used in
 the running kernel and compiles them into the new kernel. It is very
 helpful when you already have a good but generic kernel like the one on
 your live CD.

I tried this, next.  At least now, I believe I have a viable kernel.  But it 
still didn't work.

 If even that doesn't help, it might be possible that the device
 numbering has changed and your hard disk is detected as /dev/sdb or so.
 Try mounting it by UUID (google for it, please).

I tried this.  Only now, fsck.ext2 tells me that it can't resolve the UUID.

Here is the new fstab:
/dev/sda1   /boot   ext2noauto,noatime  1 2 
  

  
UUID=ba7511dd-a5f9-48d8-8102-cf71c08a0c7b /   ext2noatime0 1   

  
/dev/sda2   noneswapsw  0 0 
  
/dev/cdrom  /mnt/cdrom  autonoauto,ro   0 0  

At this point, I'm going to move the drive to a different port on the SATA 
chain; shouldn't change anything, but I'm running out of ideas.  I'll also 
check the BIOS for anything stupid-obvious.

So, I guess I'm still stuck!

 Hope this helps,
 Florian Philipp

-- 

Take care and have fun,
Mike Diehl.



Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Mike Diehl
One more interesting tidbit:

When it boots, I can see that VFS was able to mount ROOT on device 8:3.

So, it doesn't seem to be hardware or driver related.  Looks like something 
with the filesystem?  fsck.ext2 is the only thing complaining.  However, when 
I boot from CD, I can mount it just fine.

Anyone seen this before?

Mike.

On Friday 15 October 2010 11:40:34 am Florian Philipp wrote:
 Am 15.10.2010 19:29, schrieb Mike Diehl:
  Hi all.
  
  I've never had this much trouble with a server before, but I've been
  pulling my hair out.
  
  The install seemed to go well, but when I rebooted it from it's own hard
  drive, it fails.  fsck claims that it can't open /dev/sda3 or that the
  superblock doesn't describe a valid ext2 filesystem.
  
  However, when I reboot from the live CD, it mounts just fine and fsck
  says it's clean.
  
  Here is the /etc/fstab:
  /dev/sda1   /boot   ext2noauto,noatime  1 2
  /dev/sda3   /   ext2noatime 0 1
  /dev/sda2   noneswapsw  0 0
  /dev/cdrom  /mnt/cdrom  autonoauto,ro   0
  0 shm /dev/shmtmpfs   nodev,nosuid,noexec   
   0 0
  
  Here is the /boot/grub/grub.conf file:
  default 0
  timeout 30
  splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
  
  title Gentoo Linux
  root (hd0,0)
  kernel /bzImage root=/dev/sda3
  
  I've verified that ext2 and ext3 are in the kernel statically.  I've also
  compiled in ALL of the SATA drivers, statically.
  
  What am I missing?
 
 *All* of the drivers could be too much. There is a generic driver which
 can prevent the right driver from taking over. In that case you end up
 with a /dev/hda node and no DMA. Try to deactivate Generic ATA support
 = CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC and generic/default IDE chipset support =
 CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC.
 
 I think it is the second option that causes that problem. However, you
 won't need the first option, either.
 
 Instead of your brute-force yes to all approach, newer kernels also
 support `make localyesconfig` which takes all modules currently used in
 the running kernel and compiles them into the new kernel. It is very
 helpful when you already have a good but generic kernel like the one on
 your live CD.
 
 If even that doesn't help, it might be possible that the device
 numbering has changed and your hard disk is detected as /dev/sdb or so.
 Try mounting it by UUID (google for it, please).
 
 Hope this helps,
 Florian Philipp

-- 

Take care and have fun,
Mike Diehl.



Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:47 on Friday 15 October 2010, Mike Diehl 
did opine thusly:

  Instead of your brute-force yes to all approach, newer kernels also
  support `make localyesconfig` which takes all modules currently used in
  the running kernel and compiles them into the new kernel. It is very
  helpful when you already have a good but generic kernel like the one on
  your live CD.
 
 Oh now this is cool.  Thank you.  I'll try this, also.

You could also copy the working kernel and it's modules off the LiveCD onto 
the hard disk. It won't be perfect but at least you'd have something that 
works and can boot to assist troubleshooting. Booting and running off LiveCDs 
is both convenient and painful.


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 15.10.2010 21:23, schrieb Mike Diehl:
 On Friday 15 October 2010 11:40:34 am Florian Philipp wrote:
 Am 15.10.2010 19:29, schrieb Mike Diehl:
 Hi all.

 I've never had this much trouble with a server before, but I've been
 pulling my hair out.

 The install seemed to go well, but when I rebooted it from it's own hard
 drive, it fails.  fsck claims that it can't open /dev/sda3 or that the
 superblock doesn't describe a valid ext2 filesystem.
 
 *All* of the drivers could be too much. There is a generic driver which
 can prevent the right driver from taking over. In that case you end up
 with a /dev/hda node and no DMA. Try to deactivate Generic ATA support
 = CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC and generic/default IDE chipset support =
 CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC.
 I think it is the second option that causes that problem. However, you
 won't need the first option, either.
 
 I tried this, first without success.  I then ran through all combinations of 
 sda3, sdb3, hda3, hdb3 in /etc/fstab.  This didn't work.
 
 Instead of your brute-force yes to all approach, newer kernels also
 support `make localyesconfig` which takes all modules currently used in
 the running kernel and compiles them into the new kernel. It is very
 helpful when you already have a good but generic kernel like the one on
 your live CD.
 
 I tried this, next.  At least now, I believe I have a viable kernel.  But it 
 still didn't work.
 
 If even that doesn't help, it might be possible that the device
 numbering has changed and your hard disk is detected as /dev/sdb or so.
 Try mounting it by UUID (google for it, please).
 
 I tried this.  Only now, fsck.ext2 tells me that it can't resolve the UUID.
 
 Here is the new fstab:
 /dev/sda1   /boot   ext2noauto,noatime  1 2   
 
   
 
 UUID=ba7511dd-a5f9-48d8-8102-cf71c08a0c7b /   ext2noatime0 1  
  
   
 
 /dev/sda2   noneswapsw  0 0   
 
 /dev/cdrom  /mnt/cdrom  autonoauto,ro   0 0  
 
 At this point, I'm going to move the drive to a different port on the SATA 
 chain; shouldn't change anything, but I'm running out of ideas.  I'll also 
 check the BIOS for anything stupid-obvious.
 
 So, I guess I'm still stuck!
 

Hmm, sounds like a serious problem. I suggest you try to get into an
early stage during boot and try to move forward from there. Try to add
'1' to the parameters in order to get into single-user mode. You can
also try 'init=/bin/bash'.

There are lots of other options you can try. For a long time, 'noapic'
(not 'noapci') was my first candidate for odd boot issues. Take a look
at /usr/sr/linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt for more options.

Also, which kernel sources are you using and which live CD (with which
kernel version)?  Is there a specific reason why you use ext2 for root?
What kind of system do you run, anyway? And, just by chance, you are not
using an extremely large (1TB) drive which might happen to have 4kB
blocks instead of 512 B?

Regards,
Florian Philipp



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with new install

2010-10-15 Thread Bill Longman
On 10/15/2010 12:23 PM, Mike Diehl wrote:
 On Friday 15 October 2010 11:40:34 am Florian Philipp wrote:
 Am 15.10.2010 19:29, schrieb Mike Diehl:
 Hi all.

 I've never had this much trouble with a server before, but I've been
 pulling my hair out.

 The install seemed to go well, but when I rebooted it from it's own hard
 drive, it fails.  fsck claims that it can't open /dev/sda3 or that the
 superblock doesn't describe a valid ext2 filesystem.
 
 *All* of the drivers could be too much. There is a generic driver which
 can prevent the right driver from taking over. In that case you end up
 with a /dev/hda node and no DMA. Try to deactivate Generic ATA support
 = CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC and generic/default IDE chipset support =
 CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC.
 I think it is the second option that causes that problem. However, you
 won't need the first option, either.
 
 I tried this, first without success.  I then ran through all combinations of 
 sda3, sdb3, hda3, hdb3 in /etc/fstab.  This didn't work.
 
 Instead of your brute-force yes to all approach, newer kernels also
 support `make localyesconfig` which takes all modules currently used in
 the running kernel and compiles them into the new kernel. It is very
 helpful when you already have a good but generic kernel like the one on
 your live CD.
 
 I tried this, next.  At least now, I believe I have a viable kernel.  But it 
 still didn't work.
 
 If even that doesn't help, it might be possible that the device
 numbering has changed and your hard disk is detected as /dev/sdb or so.
 Try mounting it by UUID (google for it, please).
 
 I tried this.  Only now, fsck.ext2 tells me that it can't resolve the UUID.
 
 Here is the new fstab:
 /dev/sda1   /boot   ext2noauto,noatime  1 2   
 
   
 
 UUID=ba7511dd-a5f9-48d8-8102-cf71c08a0c7b /   ext2noatime0 1  
  
   
 
 /dev/sda2   noneswapsw  0 0   
 
 /dev/cdrom  /mnt/cdrom  autonoauto,ro   0 0  
 
 At this point, I'm going to move the drive to a different port on the SATA 
 chain; shouldn't change anything, but I'm running out of ideas.  I'll also 
 check the BIOS for anything stupid-obvious.

You might also want to jump into grub's shell and look around in /dev
for devices. If they are there, you know the kernel is providing the
modules correctly. They might not be sda but hda or vice-versa. Also,
you can use lsmod and make sure.