[gmx-users] energ minimization: cg and I-bfgs
Hi, protein have 2 positive chage, I use PRODRG built .gro of CH3C00H, and add two molecular CH3C00H, four molecular NA into system. At energy minimization step, after steep, when I use cg, Fatal error: DD cell 1 4 0 could only obtain 14 of the 16 atoms that are connected via constraints from the neighboring cells. This probably means your constraint lengths are too long compared to the domain decomposition cell size. Decrease the number of domain decomposition grid cells or lincs-order. I search the ways to sovle it in the GMX forum, there are some similar error exist, I also try as the answers suggest, but I can not fix it. I don't known what the cause. things should go onI want to do enery minimization more better in order to avoid protein crash during simulation. So, I try another way to do energ minimization. After steep, I use I-bfgs steep .mdp: title = bovin cpp = /usr/bin/cpp define = -DFLEXIBLE constraints = all-bonds integrator = cg dt = 0.002; ps ! nsteps = 1000 nstlist = 10 ns_type = grid rlist = 1.0 coulombtype = PME rcoulomb= 1.0 vdwtype = cut-off rvdw= 1.4 fourierspacing= 0.12 fourier_nx= 0 fourier_ny= 0 fourier_nz= 0 pme_order= 4 ewald_rtol= 1e-5 optimize_fft= yes emtol = 100.0 emstep = 0.01 ; GENERATE VELOCITIES FOR STARTUP RUN gen-vel = no gen-temp = 293 gen-seed = 173529 process: Steepest Descents: Tolerance (Fmax) = 1.0e+03 Number of steps= 2000 Step=0, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= -3.49891e+05 Fmax= 2.19267e+04, atom= 21003 Step=1, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= -3.66773e+05 Fmax= 1.02238e+04, atom= 3054 Step=2, Dmax= 1.2e-02 nm, Epot= -3.86198e+05 Fmax= 5.97878e+03, atom= 1146 Step=3, Dmax= 1.4e-02 nm, Epot= -4.03308e+05 Fmax= 3.61163e+03, atom= 1146 Step=4, Dmax= 1.7e-02 nm, Epot= -4.19782e+05 Fmax= 1.80657e+03, atom= 29071 Step=5, Dmax= 2.1e-02 nm, Epot= -4.38870e+05 Fmax= 1.43308e+03, atom= 29071 Step=6, Dmax= 2.5e-02 nm, Epot= -4.53627e+05 Fmax= 3.63104e+03, atom= 923 Step=7, Dmax= 3.0e-02 nm, Epot= -4.58169e+05 Fmax= 4.16424e+03, atom= 923 Step 8, time 0.016 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.004145, max 0.106308 (between atoms 923 and 924) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length 921923 32.40.1385 0.1445 0.1340 923927 33.00.1382 0.1444 0.1340 923924 39.90.1386 0.1482 0.1340 924925 34.20.1014 0.1068 0.1000 Step=8, Dmax= 3.6e-02 nm, Epot= -4.60414e+05 Fmax= 5.82027e+03, atom= 31 Step 9, time 0.018 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.008160, max 0.128456 (between atoms 34 and 38) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length 38 40 38.90.1410 0.1558 0.1390 34 38 39.90.1412 0.1569 0.1390 31 34 39.40.1414 0.1559 0.1390 31 32 38.60.1413 0.1545 0.1390 32 36 38.30.1412 0.1551 0.1390 36 40 38.20.1409 0.1552 0.1390 1020 1021 30.00.1397 0.1475 0.1390 1106 1110 32.90.1400 0.1499 0.1390 1103 1106 32.80.1401 0.1492 0.1390 1103 1104 32.10.1401 0.1488 0.1390 1104 1108 32.70.1400 0.1497 0.1390 1110 1112 32.40.1400 0.1496 0.1390 1108 1112 32.80.1400 0.1499 0.1390 Step 9, time 0.018 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.003367, max 0.128456 (between atoms 34 and 38) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length 34 38 39.90.1412 0.1569 0.1390 38 40 38.90.1410 0.1558 0.1390 36 40 38.20.1409 0.1552 0.1390 32 36 38.30.1412 0.1551 0.1390 31 32 38.60.1413 0.1545 0.1390 31 34 39.40.1414 0.1559 0.1390 Step 9, time 0.018 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.008437, max 0.134299 (between atoms 373 and 377) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length 368371 39.60.1451 0.1559 0.1390 368369 39.70.1452 0.1565 0.1390 369373 41.30.1446 0.1576 0.1390 371375 40.60.1446 0.1566 0.1390 373377 42.30.1433 0.1577 0.1390 375377 41.70.1432
[gmx-users] segemntation fault after run do_dssp
Hi All, I already done the MD production so I want to analyse the helical structure of my protein by using do_dssp program.The command is like below : do_dssp -s md_water50.tpr -f md_water50.trr -n mainchain.ndx -sc dssp_scount.xvg -a dssp_area.xvg -ta dssp_totarea.xvg -aa dssp_averarea.xvg but after i run the command the result show like : Reading file md_water50.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (double precision) Reading file md_water50.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (double precision) Segmentation fault (core dumped) I already install the dssp program from ftp://ftp.cmbi.ru.nl/pub/software/dssp/ and follow the instruction as shown there but it seems that nothing happened..I already gedit the .bashrc for dssp. -- Best Regards, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor. alternative email : syafiqahabdulgh...@gmail.com @ gs33...@mutiara.upm.edu.my -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] xx of the xxxx bonded interactions couldn't be calculated
On 2013-06-07 04:12, Justin Lemkul wrote: On 6/6/13 10:00 PM, Badamkhatan wrote: Dear GMX-users Recently i got this error and note from my MD2 simulation. I'm solvating 1-octanol to 1-octanol and calculating free energy differences. This is the last step of my calculation and previous steps are looking fine. Basically i followed Justin's free energy tutorial. Here is Note: A list of missing interactions: LJC Pairs NB of210 missing 1 exclusions of 25308 missing 1 Molecule type '1-octanol' the first 10 missing interactions, except for exclusions: LJC Pairs NB atoms3 25 global 325 Fatal error: 2 of the 57736 bonded interactions could not be calculated because some atoms involved moved further apart than the multi-body cut-off distance (1 nm) or the two-body cut-off distance (1 nm), see option -rdd, for pairs and tabulated bonds also see option -ddcheck Please help me and suggest any idea to solve this problem? Sounds like you're http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up. It may also be the opposite, box shrinking under equilibration. Try: mdrun [options] -rdd 1.25 -Justin -- David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology Dept. of Cell Molec. Biol., Uppsala University. Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205. sp...@xray.bmc.uu.sehttp://folding.bmc.uu.se -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] segemntation fault after run do_dssp
HI, What version of gromacs is this? DSSP changed its syntax a while back and we had to adjust do_dssp accordingly. You may have a mismatch between gromacs and dssp versions. Erik On 7 Jun 2013, at 08:42, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani pqah...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I already done the MD production so I want to analyse the helical structure of my protein by using do_dssp program.The command is like below : do_dssp -s md_water50.tpr -f md_water50.trr -n mainchain.ndx -sc dssp_scount.xvg -a dssp_area.xvg -ta dssp_totarea.xvg -aa dssp_averarea.xvg but after i run the command the result show like : Reading file md_water50.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (double precision) Reading file md_water50.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (double precision) Segmentation fault (core dumped) I already install the dssp program from ftp://ftp.cmbi.ru.nl/pub/software/dssp/ and follow the instruction as shown there but it seems that nothing happened..I already gedit the .bashrc for dssp. -- Best Regards, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor. alternative email : syafiqahabdulgh...@gmail.com @ gs33...@mutiara.upm.edu.my -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
[gmx-users] Re: segemntation fault after run do_dssp
Hi Eric, I'm using gromacs 4.5.5. Is it the version is different for dssp? Thanks On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Erik Marklund [via GROMACS] ml-node+s5086n5008885...@n6.nabble.com wrote: HI, What version of gromacs is this? DSSP changed its syntax a while back and we had to adjust do_dssp accordingly. You may have a mismatch between gromacs and dssp versions. Erik On 7 Jun 2013, at 08:42, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani [hidden email] wrote: Hi All, I already done the MD production so I want to analyse the helical structure of my protein by using do_dssp program.The command is like below : do_dssp -s md_water50.tpr -f md_water50.trr -n mainchain.ndx -sc dssp_scount.xvg -a dssp_area.xvg -ta dssp_totarea.xvg -aa dssp_averarea.xvg but after i run the command the result show like : Reading file md_water50.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (double precision) Reading file md_water50.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (double precision) Segmentation fault (core dumped) I already install the dssp program from ftp://ftp.cmbi.ru.nl/pub/software/dssp/ and follow the instruction as shown there but it seems that nothing happened..I already gedit the .bashrc for dssp. -- Best Regards, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor. alternative email : [hidden email] @ [hidden email] -- gmx-users mailing list[hidden email] http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [hidden email]. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing list[hidden email] http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [hidden email]. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/segemntation-fault-after-run-do-dssp-tp5008883p5008885.html To start a new topic under GROMACS Users Forum, email ml-node+s5086n4370410...@n6.nabble.com To unsubscribe from GROMACS, click here. NAML -- Best Regards, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor. alternative email : syafiqahabdulgh...@gmail.com @ gs33...@mutiara.upm.edu.my -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/segemntation-fault-after-run-do-dssp-tp5008883p5008886.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] segemntation fault after run do_dssp
Hi, It may very well be. Here's the red mine issue http://redmine.gromacs.org/issues/891. If there's a -ver option for do_dssp then it's capable of the new syntax. If not then it assumes the old syntax. If you can't install a newer version of gromacs there is the option to install old_dssp which is available through the dssp webpage. Erik On 7 Jun 2013, at 10:20, shika pqah...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Eric, I'm using gromacs 4.5.5. Is it the version is different for dssp? Thanks On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Erik Marklund [via GROMACS] ml-node+s5086n5008885...@n6.nabble.com wrote: HI, What version of gromacs is this? DSSP changed its syntax a while back and we had to adjust do_dssp accordingly. You may have a mismatch between gromacs and dssp versions. Erik On 7 Jun 2013, at 08:42, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani [hidden email] wrote: Hi All, I already done the MD production so I want to analyse the helical structure of my protein by using do_dssp program.The command is like below : do_dssp -s md_water50.tpr -f md_water50.trr -n mainchain.ndx -sc dssp_scount.xvg -a dssp_area.xvg -ta dssp_totarea.xvg -aa dssp_averarea.xvg but after i run the command the result show like : Reading file md_water50.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (double precision) Reading file md_water50.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (double precision) Segmentation fault (core dumped) I already install the dssp program from ftp://ftp.cmbi.ru.nl/pub/software/dssp/ and follow the instruction as shown there but it seems that nothing happened..I already gedit the .bashrc for dssp. -- Best Regards, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor. alternative email : [hidden email] @ [hidden email] -- gmx-users mailing list[hidden email] http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [hidden email]. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing list[hidden email] http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [hidden email]. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/segemntation-fault-after-run-do-dssp-tp5008883p5008885.html To start a new topic under GROMACS Users Forum, email ml-node+s5086n4370410...@n6.nabble.com To unsubscribe from GROMACS, click here. NAML -- Best Regards, Nur Syafiqah Abdul Ghani, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor. alternative email : syafiqahabdulgh...@gmail.com @ gs33...@mutiara.upm.edu.my -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/segemntation-fault-after-run-do-dssp-tp5008883p5008886.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
[gmx-users] User-define non bonded table
Dear Gmx Users, I want to specify a table to mdrun for non bonded parameters. I wish to set it up for all atoms with same potential. Is there any example of the table like this? I want use my specific potential so table should have two columns: X distance [nm] and Y Potential energy {kJ/mol]. Is that right? How can I tell gromacs to use it for all interactions? Thanks Steven -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
[gmx-users] Problems building gromacs 4.6
I am trying to build Gromacs 4.6 on a Linux machine, running Scientific Linux 6.2. I am doing an MPI build with Intel-MPI, and Intel compilers, and MKL. Commands I issue to set environment, and run cmake (available as cmake28) are: [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel/compiler/64 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel-mpi/64/4.1.0 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel/mkl/64 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ export CC=mpicc [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ export CXX=mpicxx [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ mklvars_intel64.sh [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ cmake28 ../gromacs-4.6 -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/cczcb/gromacs-install -DGMX_MPI=ON -DGMX_FFT_LIBRARY=mkl -DMKL_INCLUDE_DIR=/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/include -DMKL_LIBRARIES=/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_intel_lp64.so;/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_sequential.so;/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_core.so This completes, but gives Segmentation fault messages at the end. Output attached as 'cmake28.out' When I type 'make', it gets to 53% then gives a large number of 'undefined reference' errors, see 'make.out'. I have also tried only putting the libmkl_core.so library path as the setting for MKL_LIBRARIES. This avoids the Segmentation faults, but again results in many undefined references, as you might expect. Any idea what could be happening here ? Is Cmake messing up in parsing the command in some way ? Is there a different approach I could use to build Gromacs ? Any assistance much appreciated! Colin cmake28.out http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/file/n5008889/cmake28.out make.out http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/file/n5008889/make.out -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Problems-building-gromacs-4-6-tp5008889.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] User-define non bonded table
Hi Neumann, You can use tabulated potential option in gromacs. Please check the site given below: http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tabulated_Potentials Thanks, Mohan On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote: Dear Gmx Users, I want to specify a table to mdrun for non bonded parameters. I wish to set it up for all atoms with same potential. Is there any example of the table like this? I want use my specific potential so table should have two columns: X distance [nm] and Y Potential energy {kJ/mol]. Is that right? How can I tell gromacs to use it for all interactions? Thanks Steven -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] User-define non bonded table
Thank you, just getting into this. I just dont understand why they start from x=0.04? Why not 0.02 or sth else? Steven On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mohan maruthi sena maruthi.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Neumann, You can use tabulated potential option in gromacs. Please check the site given below: http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tabulated_Potentials Thanks, Mohan On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Gmx Users, I want to specify a table to mdrun for non bonded parameters. I wish to set it up for all atoms with same potential. Is there any example of the table like this? I want use my specific potential so table should have two columns: X distance [nm] and Y Potential energy {kJ/mol]. Is that right? How can I tell gromacs to use it for all interactions? Thanks Steven -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
[gmx-users] Re: using previous window restart file
Dear All, Please any suggestion? regards, On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:53 PM, gromacs query gromacsqu...@gmail.comwrote: Dear All, (Sorry for long mail!) (Thanks Thomas Schlesier for clarifying previous umbrella queries) I wish to run umbrella samplings using restart file of previous window. e.g. initial distance between A (reference) and B (pulled group) is 1 nm (10 Angs) then I intend to run 10 windows after each 1 Angstrom. Due to some reasons I want to use restart file of previous window, so if suppose 1st window (10 Angstrom window) is done then I will use last restart file of 1st window for 2nd window (9 Angstrom window) (This is different from Justin's tutorial in which initial configurations are generated in single pulling experiment). In such case as I said I want to use last restart of 1st Window for 2nd window so obviously the distance will not be exactly 9 Angstrom between A and B for 1st window restart file. What approach I should use for adjusting initial distance being 9 Angstrom to get initial configuration for 2nd window Knowing the distance between A and B in the restart file of 1st window (say 'x') then for second window y = 9 - x (where x can be or 9), First approach: pull_rate1 = (y/1000) or even slower Second approach: pull_init1 = y pull_rate1 = 0.0 Please Note for both the cases I can use pull_vec1 or pull rates (- or +) for positive or negative relative movement to get exact 9 Angstrom window distance regards, Jiomm -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] Re: using previous window restart file
On 6/7/13 7:41 AM, gromacs query wrote: Dear All, Please any suggestion? I think you should be able to set whatever value you like for pull_init1 and the code should take care of it. -Justin On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:53 PM, gromacs query gromacsqu...@gmail.comwrote: Dear All, (Sorry for long mail!) (Thanks Thomas Schlesier for clarifying previous umbrella queries) I wish to run umbrella samplings using restart file of previous window. e.g. initial distance between A (reference) and B (pulled group) is 1 nm (10 Angs) then I intend to run 10 windows after each 1 Angstrom. Due to some reasons I want to use restart file of previous window, so if suppose 1st window (10 Angstrom window) is done then I will use last restart file of 1st window for 2nd window (9 Angstrom window) (This is different from Justin's tutorial in which initial configurations are generated in single pulling experiment). In such case as I said I want to use last restart of 1st Window for 2nd window so obviously the distance will not be exactly 9 Angstrom between A and B for 1st window restart file. What approach I should use for adjusting initial distance being 9 Angstrom to get initial configuration for 2nd window Knowing the distance between A and B in the restart file of 1st window (say 'x') then for second window y = 9 - x (where x can be or 9), First approach: pull_rate1 = (y/1000) or even slower Second approach: pull_init1 = y pull_rate1 = 0.0 Please Note for both the cases I can use pull_vec1 or pull rates (- or +) for positive or negative relative movement to get exact 9 Angstrom window distance regards, Jiomm -- Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] User-define non bonded table
On 6/7/13 7:36 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you, just getting into this. I just dont understand why they start from x=0.04? Why not 0.02 or sth else? You can start the table from whatever value of x that you like, but at a certain point, it is unlikely that particles ever come that close, given normal repulsive potentials. -Justin On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mohan maruthi sena maruthi.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Neumann, You can use tabulated potential option in gromacs. Please check the site given below: http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tabulated_Potentials Thanks, Mohan On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Gmx Users, I want to specify a table to mdrun for non bonded parameters. I wish to set it up for all atoms with same potential. Is there any example of the table like this? I want use my specific potential so table should have two columns: X distance [nm] and Y Potential energy {kJ/mol]. Is that right? How can I tell gromacs to use it for all interactions? Thanks Steven -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] User-define non bonded table
Thank you. Another question... I specify in my table functions e.g. g(x) and h(x) and it is written that I need to setup parameters C6 and C12. But where I should specify them? In : [ atomtypes ] ;name at.num mass charge ptype V(c6) W(c12) O 8 15.99940 0.000 A 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 or [ nonbond_params ] ; i j func V(c6) W(c12) O O 1 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 O OA 1 0.22617E-02 0.13807E-05 Or maybe both? On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/7/13 7:36 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you, just getting into this. I just dont understand why they start from x=0.04? Why not 0.02 or sth else? You can start the table from whatever value of x that you like, but at a certain point, it is unlikely that particles ever come that close, given normal repulsive potentials. -Justin On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mohan maruthi sena maruthi.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Neumann, You can use tabulated potential option in gromacs. Please check the site given below: http://www.gromacs.org/**Documentation/How-tos/**Tabulated_Potentialshttp://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tabulated_Potentials Thanks, Mohan On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Gmx Users, I want to specify a table to mdrun for non bonded parameters. I wish to set it up for all atoms with same potential. Is there any example of the table like this? I want use my specific potential so table should have two columns: X distance [nm] and Y Potential energy {kJ/mol]. Is that right? How can I tell gromacs to use it for all interactions? Thanks Steven -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- ==**== Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin ==**== -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/** Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] User-define non bonded table
On 6/7/13 8:21 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you. Another question... I specify in my table functions e.g. g(x) and h(x) and it is written that I need to setup parameters C6 and C12. But where I should specify them? In : [ atomtypes ] ;name at.num mass charge ptype V(c6) W(c12) O 8 15.99940 0.000 A 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 or [ nonbond_params ] ; i j func V(c6) W(c12) O O 1 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 O OA 1 0.22617E-02 0.13807E-05 Or maybe both? Try the tutorial first and make sure you can replicate it. If you're just looking to tweak C6 and C12 parameters, there's no need for tabulated functions at all. -Justin On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/7/13 7:36 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you, just getting into this. I just dont understand why they start from x=0.04? Why not 0.02 or sth else? You can start the table from whatever value of x that you like, but at a certain point, it is unlikely that particles ever come that close, given normal repulsive potentials. -Justin On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mohan maruthi sena maruthi.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Neumann, You can use tabulated potential option in gromacs. Please check the site given below: http://www.gromacs.org/**Documentation/How-tos/**Tabulated_Potentialshttp://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tabulated_Potentials Thanks, Mohan On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Gmx Users, I want to specify a table to mdrun for non bonded parameters. I wish to set it up for all atoms with same potential. Is there any example of the table like this? I want use my specific potential so table should have two columns: X distance [nm] and Y Potential energy {kJ/mol]. Is that right? How can I tell gromacs to use it for all interactions? Thanks Steven -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- ==**== Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin ==**== -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/** Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] User-define non bonded table
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/7/13 8:21 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you. Another question... I specify in my table functions e.g. g(x) and h(x) and it is written that I need to setup parameters C6 and C12. But where I should specify them? In : [ atomtypes ] ;name at.num mass charge ptype V(c6) W(c12) O 8 15.99940 0.000 A 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 or [ nonbond_params ] ; i j func V(c6) W(c12) O O 1 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 O OA 1 0.22617E-02 0.13807E-05 Or maybe both? Try the tutorial first and make sure you can replicate it. If you're just looking to tweak C6 and C12 parameters, there's no need for tabulated functions at all. -Justin I want to change function g(x) to use Chandler Anderson potential so g(x) = 1/r^6 + 1/4sigma^6. Would that be a combination rule 1 with nonbonded function type 1 in [ defaults ] ? Then in ffnonbonded.itp in [atomtypes] can I specify my my own C6 C12 ? On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/7/13 7:36 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you, just getting into this. I just dont understand why they start from x=0.04? Why not 0.02 or sth else? You can start the table from whatever value of x that you like, but at a certain point, it is unlikely that particles ever come that close, given normal repulsive potentials. -Justin On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mohan maruthi sena maruthi.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Neumann, You can use tabulated potential option in gromacs. Please check the site given below: http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/ Tabulated_Potentialshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Documentation/How-tos/**Tabulated_Potentials http://**www.gromacs.org/Documentation/**How-tos/Tabulated_Potentialshttp://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tabulated_Potentials Thanks, Mohan On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Gmx Users, I want to specify a table to mdrun for non bonded parameters. I wish to set it up for all atoms with same potential. Is there any example of the table like this? I want use my specific potential so table should have two columns: X distance [nm] and Y Potential energy {kJ/mol]. Is that right? How can I tell gromacs to use it for all interactions? Thanks Steven -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Search h**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Search h**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- ==== Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin h**ttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.**edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin ==== -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
Re: [gmx-users] Is non-linear data output/storage possible?
That is all that is possible. Mark On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Dallas Warren dallas.war...@monash.eduwrote: Easiest, naïve way that I can see is to do the simulation in blocks, and change the output settings within the mdp file used as required for each block. Catch ya, Dr. Dallas Warren Drug Discovery Biology Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University 381 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3052 dallas.war...@monash.edu +61 3 9903 9304 - When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail. -Original Message- From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users- boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Neha Sent: Thursday, 6 June 2013 11:00 PM To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: [gmx-users] Is non-linear data output/storage possible? Hi everybody! This is a sort-of general question that I am not sure where to find the answer for. I am running a simulation on the order of tens of microseconds. However I also want to do some analysis on the order of very small time steps but I do not want to save the data of very small time steps throughout the length of the simulation as it will be taxing for the memory. I was wondering if there was a way to be able to store small time steps for a small time during the simulation and continue to increase the amount of time that energy/forces/coordinates are written and stored? I understand the mdp files control the output, but I do not know how to have a non-linear output of data using nstxout etc. Please let me know if you have any ideas/have succeeded in getting Gromacs to do this! -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Is-non- linear-data-output-storage-possible-tp5008858.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] User-define non bonded table
It is stated in manual that tables must always contain 7 columns with a meaningful data (i.e. no zeros). must be entered in all columns. The example of table6-12.xvg involves xeros until 0.04. How come? I want to cut my potential at some point to zero - can I put zeros or shall I specify some values so the potential will equal zero? On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/7/13 8:21 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you. Another question... I specify in my table functions e.g. g(x) and h(x) and it is written that I need to setup parameters C6 and C12. But where I should specify them? In : [ atomtypes ] ;name at.num mass charge ptype V(c6) W(c12) O 8 15.99940 0.000 A 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 or [ nonbond_params ] ; i j func V(c6) W(c12) O O 1 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 O OA 1 0.22617E-02 0.13807E-05 Or maybe both? Try the tutorial first and make sure you can replicate it. If you're just looking to tweak C6 and C12 parameters, there's no need for tabulated functions at all. -Justin I want to change function g(x) to use Chandler Anderson potential so g(x) = 1/r^6 + 1/4sigma^6. Would that be a combination rule 1 with nonbonded function type 1 in [ defaults ] ? Then in ffnonbonded.itp in [atomtypes] can I specify my my own C6 C12 ? On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/7/13 7:36 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you, just getting into this. I just dont understand why they start from x=0.04? Why not 0.02 or sth else? You can start the table from whatever value of x that you like, but at a certain point, it is unlikely that particles ever come that close, given normal repulsive potentials. -Justin On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mohan maruthi sena maruthi.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Neumann, You can use tabulated potential option in gromacs. Please check the site given below: http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/ Tabulated_Potentialshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Documentation/How-tos/**Tabulated_Potentials http://**www.gromacs.org/Documentation/** How-tos/Tabulated_Potentialshttp://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tabulated_Potentials Thanks, Mohan On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Gmx Users, I want to specify a table to mdrun for non bonded parameters. I wish to set it up for all atoms with same potential. Is there any example of the table like this? I want use my specific potential so table should have two columns: X distance [nm] and Y Potential energy {kJ/mol]. Is that right? How can I tell gromacs to use it for all interactions? Thanks Steven -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Search h**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Search h**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- ==== Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
Re: [gmx-users] Problems building gromacs 4.6
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:20 PM, colinbannister colin.bannis...@nottingham.ac.uk wrote: I am trying to build Gromacs 4.6 on a Linux machine, running Scientific Linux 6.2. I am doing an MPI build with Intel-MPI, and Intel compilers, and MKL. Commands I issue to set environment, and run cmake (available as cmake28) are: [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel/compiler/64 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel-mpi/64/4.1.0 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel/mkl/64 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ export CC=mpicc [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ export CXX=mpicxx [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ mklvars_intel64.sh [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ cmake28 ../gromacs-4.6 -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/cczcb/gromacs-install -DGMX_MPI=ON -DGMX_FFT_LIBRARY=mkl -DMKL_INCLUDE_DIR=/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/include -DMKL_LIBRARIES=/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_intel_lp64.so;/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_sequential.so;/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_core.so This completes, but gives Segmentation fault messages at the end. Output attached as 'cmake28.out' When I type 'make', it gets to 53% then gives a large number of 'undefined reference' errors, see 'make.out'. I have also tried only putting the libmkl_core.so library path as the setting for MKL_LIBRARIES. This avoids the Segmentation faults, but again results in many undefined references, as you might expect. Any idea what could be happening here ? Is Cmake messing up in parsing the command in some way ? Is there a different approach I could use to build Gromacs ? All that sounds very weird, and makes me wonder whether an MKL test program would compile on your system. Since the value of MKL is very limited, I would suggest compiling with FFTW for now. GROMACS 4.6.2 streamlined the MKL build process greatly for icc = 11, but I would suggest waiting until GROMACS 4.6.3, because of a performance regression with MPI builds that we are working on fixing. Cheers, Mark Any assistance much appreciated! Colin cmake28.out http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/file/n5008889/cmake28.out make.out http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/file/n5008889/make.out -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Problems-building-gromacs-4-6-tp5008889.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] Unable to download Gromacs source tar file
They're fine now. Perhaps the FTP server was offline briefly. Mark On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Bhamy Maithry Shenoy bhamymait...@aero.iisc.ernet.in wrote: Hi, I would like to use Gromacs for MD simulation of biomolecules. But I am not able to download any of the source files from the link http://www.gromacs.org/Downloads Can anyone please help. Thanks and regards, Maithry -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] Regarding mdrun
Can't say On the information given, something about the protocol might be too aggressive. Mark On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Venkat Reddy venkat...@gmail.com wrote: Dear gmx-users, I am experiencing some strange things while performing mdrun. I am running a CG simulation and it is terminating with LINCS warnings after approx. 500ns of simulation. If I restart it with the check point file, then its running with out any errors. Is my simulation is reliable?? I am using Gromacs-4.5.5. Thank you -- With Best Wishes Venkat Reddy Chirasani PhD student Laboratory of Computational Biophysics Department of Biotechnology IIT Madras Chennai INDIA-600036 -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] Getting .edr file data as a generic data file
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Neha nshafi...@wesleyan.edu wrote: Hi again! At the moment, the only way I know how to access .edr files is through the use of g_energy. However g_energy only outputs .xvg files which is fine for routine analysis. However if I want to get into further processing, it would be helpful if I could get the information stored in the .edr files in a more pliable format. It doesn't get more pliable than the plain text in .xvg! But there are some ideas here http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Graphing_Data Mark Please let me know if you know how to do this! I am a completely new user to Gromacs and appreciate all the help possible. -Neha -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Getting-edr-file-data-as-a-generic-data-file-tp5008863.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] velocity-verlet giving nans
Don't know, but re-interpreting the old velocities at a new time might not be fully integrated with things calculated from the old velocities, such as temperature-coupling quantities. For switching integrators, you will need to re-equilibrate, so you may as well generate new velocities and avoid the problem. If you want to suggest fixing any possible problem, please file an issue at redmine.gromacs.org Cheers, Mark On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Sikandar Mashayak symasha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi I first performed a simulation using leap-frog integrator, which went well and got the expected results. For post-processing I want velocities at full time step, but, as per my understanding, leap-frog computes and writes velocities at half-time step. Therefore, I just changed integrator from 'md' to 'md-vv', i.e., velocity verlet. Unfortunately, after this change in .mdp file (i.e. keeping all other settings exactly same as previous leap-frog run) when I run 'mdrun' I am getting 'nan' in output from the first step itself. So I am wondering what could be the reason for this behavior of 'md-vv' integrator. Thanks Sikandar -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] Case sensitivity in atomtypes
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Baptiste Demoulin bat.demou...@gmail.comwrote: Hello GMX users, I have some troubles with overriding parameters. I have generated parameters for lipids using Lipid11 forcefield for AMBER, based on GAFF, and Acpype. This forcefield contains atomtypes cA, cB for instance. When I include the bonded parameters in [bondtypes], [angletypes] sections of my topology, or alternatively in ffbonded.itp, grompp returns warning concerning overriding of bonds and angles involving CA, CB, HA, ... (AMBER atomtypes in capital) by their equivalents in Lipid11 (cA, cB, hA, ...). WARNING 1 [file ffbonded.itp, line 222]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.137 435136 0.137 435136 --- VALUE FOR AMBER FF FOR CB-CB BOND new: cB cB 11.3240e-014.9346e+05 --- VALUE FOR LIPID11 cB-cB WARNING 2 [file ffbonded.itp, line 225]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.1404 392459 0.1404 392459 new: cA cB 11.5080e-012.7472e+05 WARNING 3 [file ffbonded.itp, line 227]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.1381 357314 0.1381 357314 new: nA cA 11.4990e-012.4568e+05 WARNING 4 [file ffbonded.itp, line 228]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.108 307106 0.108 307106 new: cA hA 11.0920e-012.8225e+05 WARNING 5 [file ffbonded.itp, line 229]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.14 392459 0.14 392459 new: cA cA 11.5350e-012.5363e+05 WARNING 6 [file ffbonded.itp, line 760]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 527.184 120 527.184 new: cA cA cA 11.1063e+025.2894e+02 WARNING 7 [file ffbonded.itp, line 773]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 527.184 120 527.184 new: cB cA cA 11.1144e+025.3162e+02 WARNING 8 [file ffbonded.itp, line 783]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 117.3 527.184 117.3 527.184 new: cB cB cA 11.2342e+025.3831e+02 WARNING 9 [file ffbonded.itp, line 788]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 418.4 120 418.4 new: cA cA hA 11.1005e+023.8802e+02 WARNING 10 [file ffbonded.itp, line 794]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 418.4 120 418.4 new: hA cA cB 11.1049e+023.9355e+02 Aren't Atomtypes supposed to be case sensitive ? Probably not, when pdb2gmx was designed. Using a case-sensitive tool like sed (or perl, or python) to re-name cA to LcA or something is probably the best solution. But don't break the fixed-column requirements of your coordinate files! Mark -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] REMD run showing temperature range more than the equilibrated.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:51 PM, suhani nagpal suhani.nag...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all ! well, I'm working on REMD with 96 replicas, with temperature range 280K to 425.04K. The NVT equilibration works well and graphs plotted show almost the required temperature after equilibration. Then, after 3 ns of remd run , the edr - xvg files show initial temperature atleast 40 -50 units up , and then gradually reduces to it's temperature. for example replica 0 has 280 temperature , for initial 40 ps, it shows temperature up till 335K an then, decline. Sounds like you're re-generating velocities, or mismatching input files. and around 21st to 22nd replica, the exchange probability is varying a lot from 20% to 60%. so, my queries are how to resolve this temperature issue and why is the exchange probability so abrupt at 21-22 replica ? Can't say. Might even be real! Mark -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
RE: [gmx-users] Problems building gromacs 4.6
Mark, Thanks for the response. We use MKL for a lot of applications, and have had no problems, except with gromacs. I wonder if there is a bug in cmake, as surely getting a segmentation fault can never be right ? If anyone else has any ideas, I'd be grateful for them - I will try a build with FFTW3 for now. Colin -Original Message- From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham Sent: 07 June 2013 15:44 To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Problems building gromacs 4.6 On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:20 PM, colinbannister colin.bannis...@nottingham.ac.uk wrote: I am trying to build Gromacs 4.6 on a Linux machine, running Scientific Linux 6.2. I am doing an MPI build with Intel-MPI, and Intel compilers, and MKL. Commands I issue to set environment, and run cmake (available as cmake28) are: [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel/compiler/64 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel-mpi/64/4.1.0 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel/mkl/64 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ export CC=mpicc [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ export CXX=mpicxx [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ mklvars_intel64.sh [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ cmake28 ../gromacs-4.6 -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/cczcb/gromacs-install -DGMX_MPI=ON -DGMX_FFT_LIBRARY=mkl -DMKL_INCLUDE_DIR=/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mk l/include -DMKL_LIBRARIES=/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/ lib/intel64/libmkl_intel_lp64.so;/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/201 1_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_sequential.so;/cm/shared/apps/inte l/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_core.so This completes, but gives Segmentation fault messages at the end. Output attached as 'cmake28.out' When I type 'make', it gets to 53% then gives a large number of 'undefined reference' errors, see 'make.out'. I have also tried only putting the libmkl_core.so library path as the setting for MKL_LIBRARIES. This avoids the Segmentation faults, but again results in many undefined references, as you might expect. Any idea what could be happening here ? Is Cmake messing up in parsing the command in some way ? Is there a different approach I could use to build Gromacs ? All that sounds very weird, and makes me wonder whether an MKL test program would compile on your system. Since the value of MKL is very limited, I would suggest compiling with FFTW for now. GROMACS 4.6.2 streamlined the MKL build process greatly for icc = 11, but I would suggest waiting until GROMACS 4.6.3, because of a performance regression with MPI builds that we are working on fixing. Cheers, Mark Any assistance much appreciated! Colin cmake28.out http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/file/n5008889/cmake28.out make.out http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/file/n5008889/make.out -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Problems-building-gromacs-4-6-tp5008 889.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
Re: [gmx-users] Problems building gromacs 4.6
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Colin Bannister colin.bannis...@nottingham.ac.uk wrote: Mark, Thanks for the response. We use MKL for a lot of applications, and have had no problems, except with gromacs. Because of the historical pain of specifying the MKL link configuration, the ease of use of FFTW, and the very small benefit MKL has seemed to provide, it's never been a priority for GROMACS. The icc -mkl flag makes life much easier, and future GROMACS versions will use it. I wonder if there is a bug in cmake, as surely getting a segmentation fault can never be right ? I've never seen CMake segfault. If anyone else has any ideas, I'd be grateful for them - I will try a build with FFTW3 for now. Other than try a new CMake, no. Mark Colin -Original Message- From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham Sent: 07 June 2013 15:44 To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Problems building gromacs 4.6 On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:20 PM, colinbannister colin.bannis...@nottingham.ac.uk wrote: I am trying to build Gromacs 4.6 on a Linux machine, running Scientific Linux 6.2. I am doing an MPI build with Intel-MPI, and Intel compilers, and MKL. Commands I issue to set environment, and run cmake (available as cmake28) are: [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel/compiler/64 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel-mpi/64/4.1.0 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ module load intel/mkl/64 [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ export CC=mpicc [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ export CXX=mpicxx [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ mklvars_intel64.sh [cczcb@login02 gromacs-build-nocuda]$ cmake28 ../gromacs-4.6 -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/cczcb/gromacs-install -DGMX_MPI=ON -DGMX_FFT_LIBRARY=mkl -DMKL_INCLUDE_DIR=/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mk l/include -DMKL_LIBRARIES=/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/ lib/intel64/libmkl_intel_lp64.so;/cm/shared/apps/intel/composer_xe/201 1_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_sequential.so;/cm/shared/apps/inte l/composer_xe/2011_sp1.11.339/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_core.so This completes, but gives Segmentation fault messages at the end. Output attached as 'cmake28.out' When I type 'make', it gets to 53% then gives a large number of 'undefined reference' errors, see 'make.out'. I have also tried only putting the libmkl_core.so library path as the setting for MKL_LIBRARIES. This avoids the Segmentation faults, but again results in many undefined references, as you might expect. Any idea what could be happening here ? Is Cmake messing up in parsing the command in some way ? Is there a different approach I could use to build Gromacs ? All that sounds very weird, and makes me wonder whether an MKL test program would compile on your system. Since the value of MKL is very limited, I would suggest compiling with FFTW for now. GROMACS 4.6.2 streamlined the MKL build process greatly for icc = 11, but I would suggest waiting until GROMACS 4.6.3, because of a performance regression with MPI builds that we are working on fixing. Cheers, Mark Any assistance much appreciated! Colin cmake28.out http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/file/n5008889/cmake28.out make.out http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/file/n5008889/make.out -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Problems-building-gromacs-4-6-tp5008 889.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents
[gmx-users] Re: mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1
Roland, I have now run the regression test on my installation and it all fails for runmd (segmentation fault). Don't see that anything else is being tested. I've placed the output of the make check (Make_check.out) at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h6867f7ivl5pcl9/j9gt9CsVdP I'll copy the first part here to give you a taste of it: --- [softwaremgmt@warp2-login build]$ more make_check.out [ 64%] Built target gmx [ 64%] Built target gmxfftw [ 76%] Built target md [ 92%] Built target gmxana [ 92%] Built target editconf [ 97%] Built target gmxpreprocess [ 97%] Built target grompp [ 98%] Built target pdb2gmx [ 98%] Built target gmxcheck [100%] Built target mdrun [100%] Built target gmxtests Test project /shared/software/temp/gromacs-4.6.1/build Start 1: regressiontests/simple 1/5 Test #1: regressiontests/simple ...***Failed0.83 sec sh: line 1: 11622 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in angles1 sh: line 1: 11628 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in angles125 sh: line 1: 11637 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep -pd mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p -pd mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in bham ... 0% tests passed, 5 tests failed out of 5 Total Test time (real) = 29.58 sec The following tests FAILED: 1 - regressiontests/simple (Failed) 2 - regressiontests/complex (Failed) 3 - regressiontests/kernel (Failed) 4 - regressiontests/freeenergy (Failed) 5 - regressiontests/pdb2gmx (Failed) Amil -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/mdrun-segmentation-fault-for-new-build-of-gromacs-4-6-1-tp5008873p5008902.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] Re: mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1
Amil, would it be possible for you to compile with a different compiler? Ideally gcc 4.7.3. Alternative could you send us the stack for when it crashes? For that you need to: - compile with debug -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug - run under gdb gdb --arg /path/to/mdrun {your mdrun arguments} - enter bt after it crashes Roland On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Amil Anderson aander...@wittenberg.edu wrote: Roland, I have now run the regression test on my installation and it all fails for runmd (segmentation fault). Don't see that anything else is being tested. I've placed the output of the make check (Make_check.out) at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h6867f7ivl5pcl9/j9gt9CsVdP I'll copy the first part here to give you a taste of it: --- [softwaremgmt@warp2-login build]$ more make_check.out [ 64%] Built target gmx [ 64%] Built target gmxfftw [ 76%] Built target md [ 92%] Built target gmxana [ 92%] Built target editconf [ 97%] Built target gmxpreprocess [ 97%] Built target grompp [ 98%] Built target pdb2gmx [ 98%] Built target gmxcheck [100%] Built target mdrun [100%] Built target gmxtests Test project /shared/software/temp/gromacs-4.6.1/build Start 1: regressiontests/simple 1/5 Test #1: regressiontests/simple ...***Failed0.83 sec sh: line 1: 11622 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in angles1 sh: line 1: 11628 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in angles125 sh: line 1: 11637 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep -pd mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p -pd mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in bham ... 0% tests passed, 5 tests failed out of 5 Total Test time (real) = 29.58 sec The following tests FAILED: 1 - regressiontests/simple (Failed) 2 - regressiontests/complex (Failed) 3 - regressiontests/kernel (Failed) 4 - regressiontests/freeenergy (Failed) 5 - regressiontests/pdb2gmx (Failed) Amil -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/mdrun-segmentation-fault-for-new-build-of-gromacs-4-6-1-tp5008873p5008902.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov 865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309 -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] Re: mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1
Running Amil's .tpr, the next output is from our CPU detection machinery. While the Xeon 5500 is not exactly new, AFAIK there should be no reason for the detection to fail. But the stack trace will tell. Mark On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Roland Schulz rol...@utk.edu wrote: Amil, would it be possible for you to compile with a different compiler? Ideally gcc 4.7.3. Alternative could you send us the stack for when it crashes? For that you need to: - compile with debug -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug - run under gdb gdb --arg /path/to/mdrun {your mdrun arguments} - enter bt after it crashes Roland On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Amil Anderson aander...@wittenberg.edu wrote: Roland, I have now run the regression test on my installation and it all fails for runmd (segmentation fault). Don't see that anything else is being tested. I've placed the output of the make check (Make_check.out) at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h6867f7ivl5pcl9/j9gt9CsVdP I'll copy the first part here to give you a taste of it: --- [softwaremgmt@warp2-login build]$ more make_check.out [ 64%] Built target gmx [ 64%] Built target gmxfftw [ 76%] Built target md [ 92%] Built target gmxana [ 92%] Built target editconf [ 97%] Built target gmxpreprocess [ 97%] Built target grompp [ 98%] Built target pdb2gmx [ 98%] Built target gmxcheck [100%] Built target mdrun [100%] Built target gmxtests Test project /shared/software/temp/gromacs-4.6.1/build Start 1: regressiontests/simple 1/5 Test #1: regressiontests/simple ...***Failed0.83 sec sh: line 1: 11622 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in angles1 sh: line 1: 11628 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in angles125 sh: line 1: 11637 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep -pd mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p -pd mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in bham ... 0% tests passed, 5 tests failed out of 5 Total Test time (real) = 29.58 sec The following tests FAILED: 1 - regressiontests/simple (Failed) 2 - regressiontests/complex (Failed) 3 - regressiontests/kernel (Failed) 4 - regressiontests/freeenergy (Failed) 5 - regressiontests/pdb2gmx (Failed) Amil -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/mdrun-segmentation-fault-for-new-build-of-gromacs-4-6-1-tp5008873p5008902.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov 865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309 -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] User-define non bonded table
On 6/7/13 10:33 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: It is stated in manual that tables must always contain 7 columns with a meaningful data (i.e. no zeros). must be entered in all columns. That may be an erroneous statement. Within very short distances, you will have nearly infinite forces, so zeroes are used instead since these distances should never occur. There's nothing wrong, per se, with entering really huge numbers for short distances. The example of table6-12.xvg involves xeros until 0.04. How come? I want to cut my potential at some point to zero - can I put zeros or shall I specify some values so the potential will equal zero? The table entries must continue until rc + 1 nm, where rc is the longest cutoff specified in the .mdp file. -Justin On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/7/13 8:21 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you. Another question... I specify in my table functions e.g. g(x) and h(x) and it is written that I need to setup parameters C6 and C12. But where I should specify them? In : [ atomtypes ] ;name at.num mass charge ptype V(c6) W(c12) O 8 15.99940 0.000 A 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 or [ nonbond_params ] ; i j func V(c6) W(c12) O O 1 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06 O OA 1 0.22617E-02 0.13807E-05 Or maybe both? Try the tutorial first and make sure you can replicate it. If you're just looking to tweak C6 and C12 parameters, there's no need for tabulated functions at all. -Justin I want to change function g(x) to use Chandler Anderson potential so g(x) = 1/r^6 + 1/4sigma^6. Would that be a combination rule 1 with nonbonded function type 1 in [ defaults ] ? Then in ffnonbonded.itp in [atomtypes] can I specify my my own C6 C12 ? On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/7/13 7:36 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you, just getting into this. I just dont understand why they start from x=0.04? Why not 0.02 or sth else? You can start the table from whatever value of x that you like, but at a certain point, it is unlikely that particles ever come that close, given normal repulsive potentials. -Justin On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mohan maruthi sena maruthi.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Neumann, You can use tabulated potential option in gromacs. Please check the site given below: http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/ Tabulated_Potentialshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Documentation/How-tos/**Tabulated_Potentials http://**www.gromacs.org/Documentation/** How-tos/Tabulated_Potentialshttp://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tabulated_Potentials Thanks, Mohan On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Gmx Users, I want to specify a table to mdrun for non bonded parameters. I wish to set it up for all atoms with same potential. Is there any example of the table like this? I want use my specific potential so table should have two columns: X distance [nm] and Y Potential energy {kJ/mol]. Is that right? How can I tell gromacs to use it for all interactions? Thanks Steven -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Search h**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users htt**p://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/**listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists/Search h**ttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists http://**www.gromacs.org/Support/**Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] Re: mdrun segmentation fault for new build of gromacs 4.6.1
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com wrote: Running Amil's .tpr, the next output is from our CPU detection machinery. While the Xeon 5500 is not exactly new, AFAIK there should be no reason for the detection to fail. But the stack trace will tell. Good point. Amil, please post the cmake output and the CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log. Because the CPU detection probably also already failed there if this is the case. Roland Mark On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Roland Schulz rol...@utk.edu wrote: Amil, would it be possible for you to compile with a different compiler? Ideally gcc 4.7.3. Alternative could you send us the stack for when it crashes? For that you need to: - compile with debug -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug - run under gdb gdb --arg /path/to/mdrun {your mdrun arguments} - enter bt after it crashes Roland On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Amil Anderson aander...@wittenberg.edu wrote: Roland, I have now run the regression test on my installation and it all fails for runmd (segmentation fault). Don't see that anything else is being tested. I've placed the output of the make check (Make_check.out) at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h6867f7ivl5pcl9/j9gt9CsVdP I'll copy the first part here to give you a taste of it: --- [softwaremgmt@warp2-login build]$ more make_check.out [ 64%] Built target gmx [ 64%] Built target gmxfftw [ 76%] Built target md [ 92%] Built target gmxana [ 92%] Built target editconf [ 97%] Built target gmxpreprocess [ 97%] Built target grompp [ 98%] Built target pdb2gmx [ 98%] Built target gmxcheck [100%] Built target mdrun [100%] Built target gmxtests Test project /shared/software/temp/gromacs-4.6.1/build Start 1: regressiontests/simple 1/5 Test #1: regressiontests/simple ...***Failed0.83 sec sh: line 1: 11622 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in angles1 sh: line 1: 11628 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in angles125 sh: line 1: 11637 Segmentation fault mdrun -notunepme -table ../table -tabl ep ../tablep -pd mdrun.out 21 Abnormal return value for ' mdrun-notunepme -table ../table -tablep ../table p -pd mdrun.out 21' was 139 No mdrun output files. FAILED. Check mdrun.out, md.log files in bham ... 0% tests passed, 5 tests failed out of 5 Total Test time (real) = 29.58 sec The following tests FAILED: 1 - regressiontests/simple (Failed) 2 - regressiontests/complex (Failed) 3 - regressiontests/kernel (Failed) 4 - regressiontests/freeenergy (Failed) 5 - regressiontests/pdb2gmx (Failed) Amil -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/mdrun-segmentation-fault-for-new-build-of-gromacs-4-6-1-tp5008873p5008902.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov 865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309 -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov 865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309 -- gmx-users mailing
Re: [gmx-users] Case sensitivity in atomtypes
I may not got the question properly but when I designed ACPYPE, I had similar issues and for that reason I created this option: -g, --disambiguatedisambiguate lower and uppercase atomtypes in GMX top file So try your usual acpype command with -g option. BTW, acpype -h can show you many more interesting options. Alan On 7 June 2013 15:55, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Baptiste Demoulin bat.demou...@gmail.comwrote: Hello GMX users, I have some troubles with overriding parameters. I have generated parameters for lipids using Lipid11 forcefield for AMBER, based on GAFF, and Acpype. This forcefield contains atomtypes cA, cB for instance. When I include the bonded parameters in [bondtypes], [angletypes] sections of my topology, or alternatively in ffbonded.itp, grompp returns warning concerning overriding of bonds and angles involving CA, CB, HA, ... (AMBER atomtypes in capital) by their equivalents in Lipid11 (cA, cB, hA, ...). WARNING 1 [file ffbonded.itp, line 222]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.137 435136 0.137 435136 --- VALUE FOR AMBER FF FOR CB-CB BOND new: cB cB 11.3240e-014.9346e+05 --- VALUE FOR LIPID11 cB-cB WARNING 2 [file ffbonded.itp, line 225]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.1404 392459 0.1404 392459 new: cA cB 11.5080e-012.7472e+05 WARNING 3 [file ffbonded.itp, line 227]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.1381 357314 0.1381 357314 new: nA cA 11.4990e-012.4568e+05 WARNING 4 [file ffbonded.itp, line 228]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.108 307106 0.108 307106 new: cA hA 11.0920e-012.8225e+05 WARNING 5 [file ffbonded.itp, line 229]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.14 392459 0.14 392459 new: cA cA 11.5350e-012.5363e+05 WARNING 6 [file ffbonded.itp, line 760]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 527.184 120 527.184 new: cA cA cA 11.1063e+025.2894e+02 WARNING 7 [file ffbonded.itp, line 773]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 527.184 120 527.184 new: cB cA cA 11.1144e+025.3162e+02 WARNING 8 [file ffbonded.itp, line 783]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 117.3 527.184 117.3 527.184 new: cB cB cA 11.2342e+025.3831e+02 WARNING 9 [file ffbonded.itp, line 788]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 418.4 120 418.4 new: cA cA hA 11.1005e+023.8802e+02 WARNING 10 [file ffbonded.itp, line 794]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 418.4 120 418.4 new: hA cA cB 11.1049e+023.9355e+02 Aren't Atomtypes supposed to be case sensitive ? Probably not, when pdb2gmx was designed. Using a case-sensitive tool like sed (or perl, or python) to re-name cA to LcA or something is probably the best solution. But don't break the fixed-column requirements of your coordinate files! Mark -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- Alan Wilter SOUSA da SILVA, DSc Bioinformatician, UniProt - PANDA, EMBL-EBI CB10 1SD, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK +44 1223 49 4588 -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] Case sensitivity in atomtypes
Thank you for your answers, I finally added l at the end of the names of the atoms, which seemed to be the easiest solution. For most of the computation, having these [bondtypes] like entries was not mandatory, but I wanted to import the topologies in pDynamo, which requires such a database. Thank you again ! Baptiste 2013/6/7 Alan alanwil...@gmail.com I may not got the question properly but when I designed ACPYPE, I had similar issues and for that reason I created this option: -g, --disambiguatedisambiguate lower and uppercase atomtypes in GMX top file So try your usual acpype command with -g option. BTW, acpype -h can show you many more interesting options. Alan On 7 June 2013 15:55, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Baptiste Demoulin bat.demou...@gmail.comwrote: Hello GMX users, I have some troubles with overriding parameters. I have generated parameters for lipids using Lipid11 forcefield for AMBER, based on GAFF, and Acpype. This forcefield contains atomtypes cA, cB for instance. When I include the bonded parameters in [bondtypes], [angletypes] sections of my topology, or alternatively in ffbonded.itp, grompp returns warning concerning overriding of bonds and angles involving CA, CB, HA, ... (AMBER atomtypes in capital) by their equivalents in Lipid11 (cA, cB, hA, ...). WARNING 1 [file ffbonded.itp, line 222]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.137 435136 0.137 435136 --- VALUE FOR AMBER FF FOR CB-CB BOND new: cB cB 11.3240e-014.9346e+05 --- VALUE FOR LIPID11 cB-cB WARNING 2 [file ffbonded.itp, line 225]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.1404 392459 0.1404 392459 new: cA cB 11.5080e-012.7472e+05 WARNING 3 [file ffbonded.itp, line 227]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.1381 357314 0.1381 357314 new: nA cA 11.4990e-012.4568e+05 WARNING 4 [file ffbonded.itp, line 228]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.108 307106 0.108 307106 new: cA hA 11.0920e-012.8225e+05 WARNING 5 [file ffbonded.itp, line 229]: Overriding Bond parameters. old: 0.14 392459 0.14 392459 new: cA cA 11.5350e-012.5363e+05 WARNING 6 [file ffbonded.itp, line 760]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 527.184 120 527.184 new: cA cA cA 11.1063e+025.2894e+02 WARNING 7 [file ffbonded.itp, line 773]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 527.184 120 527.184 new: cB cA cA 11.1144e+025.3162e+02 WARNING 8 [file ffbonded.itp, line 783]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 117.3 527.184 117.3 527.184 new: cB cB cA 11.2342e+025.3831e+02 WARNING 9 [file ffbonded.itp, line 788]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 418.4 120 418.4 new: cA cA hA 11.1005e+023.8802e+02 WARNING 10 [file ffbonded.itp, line 794]: Overriding Angle parameters. old: 120 418.4 120 418.4 new: hA cA cB 11.1049e+023.9355e+02 Aren't Atomtypes supposed to be case sensitive ? Probably not, when pdb2gmx was designed. Using a case-sensitive tool like sed (or perl, or python) to re-name cA to LcA or something is probably the best solution. But don't break the fixed-column requirements of your coordinate files! Mark -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- Alan Wilter SOUSA da SILVA, DSc Bioinformatician, UniProt - PANDA, EMBL-EBI CB10 1SD, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK +44 1223 49 4588 -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
[gmx-users] maining helix conformation
Hi, I have a pair of polypeptides which are generated as ideal helix. I want to carry out their assembly/dis-assembly simulation by maintaining the helicity of them. I wonder which of the methods for retaining helicity is better : 1. use a harmonic restraints using [bonds] directive using type 6 among the backbone amide Hbond between i and i+4th residue. 2. Use dihedral restraint to maintain phi and Psi. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Sanku -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] maining helix conformation
On 6/7/13 8:43 PM, Sanku M wrote: Hi, I have a pair of polypeptides which are generated as ideal helix. I want to carry out their assembly/dis-assembly simulation by maintaining the helicity of them. I wonder which of the methods for retaining helicity is better : 1. use a harmonic restraints using [bonds] directive using type 6 among the backbone amide Hbond between i and i+4th residue. 2. Use dihedral restraint to maintain phi and Psi. Any help will be appreciated. Either should work. Method 2 may be slightly more direct and less error-prone since the restraints can be easily written using genrestr. -Justin -- Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
[gmx-users] changing the version of file
Dear Gromacs users, I'm aiming to extract a frame file from a reduced trajectory, i did the simulation on gromacs version 4.6.1 and I would like to do my analysis in gromacs 4.5.6 for availability reasons. When I entered my command , I got this error : reading tpx file (md.tpr) version 83 with version 73 program Can any one help me how shoud I do to overcome this problem? Many thanks Safa -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] changing the version of file
On 6/7/13 11:05 PM, Souilem Safa wrote: Dear Gromacs users, I'm aiming to extract a frame file from a reduced trajectory, i did the simulation on gromacs version 4.6.1 and I would like to do my analysis in gromacs 4.5.6 for availability reasons. When I entered my command , I got this error : reading tpx file (md.tpr) version 83 with version 73 program Can any one help me how shoud I do to overcome this problem? Re-generate the .tpr file with the desired version, in this case, 4.5.6. -Justin -- Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Re: [gmx-users] changing the version of file
Dear Justin, Thank you very much for your quick response Cheers, Safa On 8 June 2013 12:07, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/7/13 11:05 PM, Souilem Safa wrote: Dear Gromacs users, I'm aiming to extract a frame file from a reduced trajectory, i did the simulation on gromacs version 4.6.1 and I would like to do my analysis in gromacs 4.5.6 for availability reasons. When I entered my command , I got this error : reading tpx file (md.tpr) version 83 with version 73 program Can any one help me how shoud I do to overcome this problem? Re-generate the .tpr file with the desired version, in this case, 4.5.6. -Justin -- ==**== Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justinhttp://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin ==**== -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-usershttp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/** Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchhttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Searchbefore posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Listshttp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
[gmx-users] Steepest LINCS WARNING
Hi, all when I use: grompp -f em_constrain.mdp -c provin_solv_ion.pdb -p provin_1dxo.top -o bovin_em.tpr mdrun -v -s bovin_em.tpr -nt 2 -deffnm em_constrain get the result: Steepest Descents: Tolerance (Fmax) = 1.0e+03 Number of steps= 2000 Step=0, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= -3.50527e+05 Fmax= 1.98713e+04, atom= 21002 Step=1, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= -3.68529e+05 Fmax= 9.78841e+03, atom= 3050 Step=2, Dmax= 1.2e-02 nm, Epot= -3.87513e+05 Fmax= 5.86618e+03, atom= 1142 Step=3, Dmax= 1.4e-02 nm, Epot= -4.04229e+05 Fmax= 3.50892e+03, atom= 1142 Step=4, Dmax= 1.7e-02 nm, Epot= -4.20673e+05 Fmax= 1.79695e+03, atom= 29070 Step=5, Dmax= 2.1e-02 nm, Epot= -4.39433e+05 Fmax= 1.41541e+03, atom= 29070 Step=6, Dmax= 2.5e-02 nm, Epot= -4.54148e+05 Fmax= 3.62694e+03, atom= 919 Step=7, Dmax= 3.0e-02 nm, Epot= -4.58532e+05 Fmax= 4.18232e+03, atom= 919 Step 8, time 0.016 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.002283, max 0.104367 (between atoms 919 and 920) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length 917919 32.20.1385 0.1443 0.1340 919923 32.90.1382 0.1442 0.1340 919920 39.70.1385 0.1480 0.1340 920921 33.90.1014 0.1067 0.1000 Step=8, Dmax= 3.6e-02 nm, Epot= -4.60091e+05 Fmax= 6.02658e+03, atom= 31 Step 9, time 0.018 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.004622, max 0.121975 (between atoms 371 and 375) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length Step 9, time 0.018 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.005013, max 0.133287 (between atoms 34 and 38) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length 425429 30.40.1400 0.1479 0.1390 429431 30.30.1399 0.1481 0.1390 422425 30.60.1400 0.1477 0.1390 422423 30.70.1400 0.1478 0.1390 34 38 40.60.1428 0.1575 0.1390 427431 30.90.1399 0.1482 0.1390 38 40 39.90.1425 0.1563 0.1390 31 34 39.90.1430 0.1566 0.1390 31 32 38.90.1430 0.1552 0.1390 32 36 38.70.1426 0.1556 0.1390 36 40 39.00.1422 0.1557 0.1390 259261 35.00.1403 0.1518 0.1390 252255 35.60.1406 0.1516 0.1390 423427 30.90.1400 0.1482 0.1390 252253 35.40.1406 0.1516 0.1390 253257 34.70.1405 0.1517 0.1390 255259 35.30.1405 0.1520 0.1390 257261 34.60.1404 0.1516 0.1390 1102 1106 36.10.1407 0.1530 0.1390 1106 1108 35.80.1407 0.1526 0.1390 1099 1102 36.00.1408 0.1523 0.1390 1099 1100 35.40.1408 0.1518 0.1390 1100 1104 36.00.1407 0.1528 0.1390 1104 1108 36.30.1406 0.1529 0.1390 366369 38.00.1461 0.1540 0.1390 366367 38.20.1462 0.1546 0.1390 367371 39.90.1456 0.1558 0.1390 369373 39.10.1455 0.1548 0.1390 371375 41.10.1442 0.1560 0.1390 373375 40.50.1440 0.1555 0.1390 917919 30.60.1443 0.1434 0.1340 919923 30.40.1442 0.1438 0.1340 919920 40.50.1480 0.1482 0.1340 920922 35.40.1064 0.1071 0.1000 920921 35.80.1067 0.1073 0.1000 Step= 10, Dmax= 2.1e-02 nm, Epot= -4.64146e+05 Fmax= 3.09226e+03, atom= 1016 Step= 11, Dmax= 2.6e-02 nm, Epot= -4.64176e+05 Fmax= 6.03740e+03, atom= 252 Step= 12, Dmax= 3.1e-02 nm, Epot= -4.66478e+05 Fmax= 5.71954e+03, atom= 582 Step 13, time 0.026 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.004522, max 0.099878 (between atoms 273 and 277) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length Step 13, time 0.026 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.005964, max 0.095520 (between atoms 582 and 585) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length 425429 33.00.1457 0.1506 0.1390 429431 33.00.1459 0.1503 0.1390 422425 32.80.1456 0.1504 0.1390 422423 33.20.1458 0.1508 0.1390 259261 33.40.1463 0.1507 0.1390 252255 34.50.1465 0.1518 0.1390 252253 34.30.1465 0.1517 0.1390 253257 33.80.1464 0.1515 0.1390
[gmx-users] Re: Steepest LINCS WARNING
when I first run enery minimization in vacuum, then add water model, (I use GROMOS96 53a6 force field, and spce water model) EM in water model: Steepest Descents: Tolerance (Fmax) = 1.0e+03 Number of steps= 2000 Step=0, Dmax= 5.0e-03 nm, Epot= -3.51690e+05 Fmax= 2.16580e+04, atom= 21005 Step=1, Dmax= 5.0e-03 nm, Epot= -3.60975e+05 Fmax= 1.24353e+04, atom= 3050 Step=2, Dmax= 6.0e-03 nm, Epot= -3.73328e+05 Fmax= 8.74189e+03, atom= 3050 Step=3, Dmax= 7.2e-03 nm, Epot= -3.85332e+05 Fmax= 5.54552e+03, atom= 3050 Step=4, Dmax= 8.6e-03 nm, Epot= -3.98300e+05 Fmax= 3.03988e+03, atom= 20120 Step=5, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= -4.13757e+05 Fmax= 1.75853e+03, atom= 29072 Step=6, Dmax= 1.2e-02 nm, Epot= -4.29896e+05 Fmax= 1.55053e+03, atom= 29072 Step=7, Dmax= 1.5e-02 nm, Epot= -4.42239e+05 Fmax= 1.28428e+03, atom= 29072 Step=8, Dmax= 1.8e-02 nm, Epot= -4.53744e+05 Fmax= 1.40998e+03, atom= 920 Step=9, Dmax= 2.1e-02 nm, Epot= -4.61547e+05 Fmax= 4.89215e+03, atom= 520 Step= 10, Dmax= 2.6e-02 nm, Epot= -4.63542e+05 Fmax= 5.75251e+03, atom= 516 Step= 11, Dmax= 3.1e-02 nm, Epot= -4.64658e+05 Fmax= 5.56526e+03, atom= 520 Step 12, time 0.024 (ps) LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.004301, max 0.126066 (between atoms 512 and 516) bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees: atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length 512516 39.00.1472 0.1565 0.1390 514518 38.50.1467 0.1558 0.1390 516520 38.80.1472 0.1557 0.1390 518520 38.70.1471 0.1550 0.1390 511514 39.70.1466 0.1561 0.1390 511512 40.10.1470 0.1561 0.1390 Step= 13, Dmax= 1.9e-02 nm, Epot= -4.67377e+05 Fmax= 3.11093e+03, atom= 5116 Step= 15, Dmax= 1.1e-02 nm, Epot= -4.68747e+05 Fmax= 2.97283e+03, atom= 520 Step= 16, Dmax= 1.3e-02 nm, Epot= -4.70028e+05 Fmax= 3.63802e+03, atom= 516 Step= 17, Dmax= 1.6e-02 nm, Epot= -4.71166e+05 Fmax= 4.03533e+03, atom= 520 Step= 18, Dmax= 1.9e-02 nm, Epot= -4.71943e+05 Fmax= 4.96009e+03, atom= 516 Step= 19, Dmax= 2.3e-02 nm, Epot= -4.72558e+05 Fmax= 5.15705e+03, atom= 520 Step= 21, Dmax= 1.4e-02 nm, Epot= -4.75111e+05 Fmax= 1.55977e+03, atom= 511 Step= 22, Dmax= 1.7e-02 nm, Epot= -4.75363e+05 Fmax= 5.38247e+03, atom= 582 Step= 23, Dmax= 2.0e-02 nm, Epot= -4.77689e+05 Fmax= 3.75868e+03, atom= 159 Step= 25, Dmax= 1.2e-02 nm, Epot= -4.79001e+05 Fmax= 2.54107e+03, atom= 159 Step= 26, Dmax= 1.4e-02 nm, Epot= -4.79210e+05 Fmax= 4.39836e+03, atom= 159 Step= 27, Dmax= 1.7e-02 nm, Epot= -4.80268e+05 Fmax= 3.94950e+03, atom= 159 Step= 29, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= -4.81704e+05 Fmax= 1.36796e+03, atom= 159 Step= 30, Dmax= 1.2e-02 nm, Epot= -4.82183e+05 Fmax= 4.55734e+03, atom= 159 Step= 31, Dmax= 1.5e-02 nm, Epot= -4.83601e+05 Fmax= 2.65995e+03, atom= 159 Step= 33, Dmax= 8.9e-03 nm, Epot= -4.84347e+05 Fmax= 2.05512e+03, atom= 159 Step= 34, Dmax= 1.1e-02 nm, Epot= -4.84811e+05 Fmax= 3.30097e+03, atom= 159 Step= 35, Dmax= 1.3e-02 nm, Epot= -4.85461e+05 Fmax= 3.18540e+03, atom= 159 Step= 36, Dmax= 1.5e-02 nm, Epot= -4.85605e+05 Fmax= 4.31161e+03, atom= 159 Step= 37, Dmax= 1.9e-02 nm, Epot= -4.85983e+05 Fmax= 4.53453e+03, atom= 159 Step= 39, Dmax= 1.1e-02 nm, Epot= -4.87596e+05 Fmax= 1.03948e+03, atom= 366 Step= 40, Dmax= 1.3e-02 nm, Epot= -4.87792e+05 Fmax= 4.95272e+03, atom= 159 Step= 41, Dmax= 1.6e-02 nm, Epot= -4.89343e+05 Fmax= 2.61653e+03, atom= 159 Step= 43, Dmax= 9.6e-03 nm, Epot= -4.89881e+05 Fmax= 2.44528e+03, atom= 159 Step= 44, Dmax= 1.2e-02 nm, Epot= -4.90124e+05 Fmax= 3.33456e+03, atom= 159 Step= 45, Dmax= 1.4e-02 nm, Epot= -4.90496e+05 Fmax= 3.58399e+03, atom= 159 Step= 47, Dmax= 8.3e-03 nm, Epot= -4.91468e+05 Fmax= 6.25094e+02, atom= 366 writing lowest energy coordinates. Back Off! I just backed up em_constrain.gro to ./#em_constrain.gro.2# Steepest Descents converged to Fmax 1000 in 48 steps Potential Energy = -4.9146806e+05 Maximum force = 6.2509442e+02 on atom 366 Norm of force = 6.6710007e+01 LINCS WARNING relative constraint deviation after LINCS: rms 0.004301, max 0.126066 (between atoms 512 and 516) ATOM512 HD2 ARG A 156 -13.495 -6.447 -3.087 1.00 0.00 H ATOM516 NH1 ARG A 156 -14.923 -9.012 -5.069 1.00 0.00 N Befor EM in vacuum, there are 4 LINCS WARNING; now there are only one, But I have no idea what can I do, to kill this LINCS WARNING? Thank you very much! maggin -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Steepest-LINCS-WARNING-tp5008919p5008920.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe