Re: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
sendmail is unable to get the MX record of the domain, kindly see if DNS is properly configured, and you can get the MX for the domain, by issuing NSLOOKUP command on the mailserver. Warm Regards. - V SHEKHAR - Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285 - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:38 pm Subject: [ilugd] sendmail problem :( Hi All, I am stuck with a strange problemin sendmail I m trying to send mail on internet using sendmail I have put my ISP mail relay server in DS tab of sendmail.cf Also m able to telnet the relay server from my m/c at port 25 Also the netstat shows like this tcp0 0 *:smtp *:* LISTEN but when I try sending mail to anywhere outside say abc.com it says connecting to abc.com via esmtp and then says no route to host even a mail to the mail relay server domain says the same Is there anyone who has configured sendmail earlier and can help me in this regard Thanks manoj Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Virus scanned by ERNET-NOC ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] clustered server configuration (linux)
Hi Mukesh You called me regarding the clusture problem but I was busy driving at that time. I was expecting your call after two hours yesterday. If you still have any query you can call me. Thanks Regards Sukhdev Singh Seera Cogitans. M: +91 9811154380 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Mukesh Verma , Gurgaon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 3:39 PM Subject: [ilugd] clustered server configuration (linux) Dear All, Can anybody, pls let me know where I can get the transaction processing performance statistics in a clustered linux server configuration? The statistics required are such that performance data is gathered based the timeline when a new box is added. I've some info from www.ameinfo.com But this data is not sufficient for a clustered unit where the system has more than 8 boxes supporting the application. The application can be assumed to be supported by Oracle at backend. Regds, Mukesh ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi Manoj Do you have any firewall installed at your network. And also check the DNS entries. Thanks Regards Sukhdev Singh Seera Cogitans. M: +91 9811154380 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:38 PM Subject: [ilugd] sendmail problem :( Hi All, I am stuck with a strange problemin sendmail I m trying to send mail on internet using sendmail I have put my ISP mail relay server in DS tab of sendmail.cf Also m able to telnet the relay server from my m/c at port 25 Also the netstat shows like this tcp0 0 *:smtp *:* LISTEN but when I try sending mail to anywhere outside say abc.com it says connecting to abc.com via esmtp and then says no route to host even a mail to the mail relay server domain says the same Is there anyone who has configured sendmail earlier and can help me in this regard Thanks manoj Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] cyberoam on linux
Hi PG Cyber oam is not a freeware exactly It is a professional software Copy Rights with 24 Online.com This company provides such softwares for corporates and cable ISP's so if you are impressed by the product quality you have to pay them rs 40,000 for installation and Rs 75,000 appx for support. If you are looking for such software you can mail me your requirements and we can give you much cheaper option. Thanks Regards Sukhdev Singh Seera Cogitans. M: +91 9811154380 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: pg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 8:37 PM Subject: [ilugd] cyberoam on linux hello everypne, can anyone please tell me is there a redhat linux 9.0 compatible version of cyberoam client (the employee internet usage manager)? i tried to get it from the net , but the versions that i got are not working, can anyone pls send in the details. ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Lotus Notes on Linux!
Does anyone knows to run Lotus Notes client 6.5 on Linux?? I am forced to use windows at office because our company uses Lotus. Thanks Regards, Mejo Jose http://linux.mejokj.com Raj Shekhar wrote: Mejo Jose wrote: I searched the whole internet for days to find a way to make Lotus Notes to run on Linux. I even mailed IBM asking for a solution. But nothing worked for me. Have you tried running Lotus Notes on Crossover Office ? Yes. I tried it on Fedora Core1. But didn't work for me! :( I tried mailing them, but there was no reply. I personally talked to some guys at IBM and even they were not able to run linux at their office machines because of this!! Hopefully, Lotus will port the Lotus Notes client to Linux someday as they have done with the server. ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] cyberoam on linux
Anil Wadhawan wrote: Hi PG Cyber oam is not a freeware exactly It is a professional software Copy Rights with 24 Online.com This company provides such softwares for corporates and cable ISP's so if you are impressed by the product quality you have to pay them rs 40,000 for installation and Rs 75,000 appx for support. If you are looking for such software you can mail me your requirements and we can give you much cheaper option. The person is not looking for the cyberoam server - just the client. The shabby windows client has a much better linux version which happens to be completely open source. It is perfectly legal, IMHO, to use such a client when you have a proper cyberoam account. Try http://linc.sourceforge.net - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya sandip (at) puroga.com http://www.sandipb.net GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Manoj...
if u do an nslookup...
1.) does the query go to the primary Name server? {it shld go}
2.) does it resolvce the domain?? {it shld resolve}
3.) does it telnet (port 25)to the MX by IP address??
4.) Does it telnet (port 25) to the MX by FQDN??
all answers shld be yes..
Revery in case of problems.. and try yto be descriptive in answer.. or
else i dont hv any pointers ...
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:58 pm
Subject: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi I checked /etc/resolv.conf put my local domain there
Still no luck
Need Help !! :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
delhi.org] On
Behalf Of V Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:40 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: Re: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
sendmail is unable to get the MX record of the domain, kindly see if
DNS is properly configured, and you can get the MX for the domain, by
issuing NSLOOKUP command on the mailserver.
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:38 pm
Subject: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi All,
I am stuck with a strange problemin sendmail
I m trying to send mail on internet using sendmail
I have put my ISP mail relay server in DS tab of sendmail.cf
Also m able to telnet the relay server from my m/c at port 25
Also the netstat shows like this
tcp0 0 *:smtp *:*
LISTEN
but when I try sending mail to anywhere outside say abc.com it says
connecting to abc.com via esmtp
and then says no route to host
even a mail to the mail relay server domain says the same
Is there anyone who has configured sendmail earlier and can help
me in
this regard
Thanks
manoj
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at
Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Virus scanned by ERNET-NOC
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at
Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Virus scanned by ERNET-NOC
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Lotus Notes on Linux!
Mejo Jose wrote: Does anyone knows to run Lotus Notes client 6.5 on Linux?? I am forced to use windows at office because our company uses Lotus. Buy crossover office (http://www.codeweavers.com) ($60) and install the client in it. This is the Lotus/IBM recommended method of using the client on linux. About the middle of this year, Lotus will be releasing a java only client for lotus notes, and you will thus be able to run the app natively on linux. - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya sandip (at) puroga.com http://www.sandipb.net GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Lotus Notes on Linux!
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: Mejo Jose wrote: Does anyone knows to run Lotus Notes client 6.5 on Linux?? I am forced to use windows at office because our company uses Lotus. Buy crossover office (http://www.codeweavers.com) ($60) and install the client in it. This is the Lotus/IBM recommended method of using the client on linux. I tried Crossover office and wine on Fedora, but failed! Is Fedora supported? Mejo http://linux.mejokj.com ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Lotus Notes on Linux!
Mejo Jose wrote: Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: Mejo Jose wrote: Does anyone knows to run Lotus Notes client 6.5 on Linux?? I am forced to use windows at office because our company uses Lotus. Buy crossover office (http://www.codeweavers.com) ($60) and install the client in it. This is the Lotus/IBM recommended method of using the client on linux. I tried Crossover office and wine on Fedora, but failed! Is Fedora supported? Lotus notes client is the most used app on CO. http://www.codeweavers.com/site/products/cxoffice/requirements/ doesnt mention any distro specific dependency. What exaclty do you mean by saying that it has failed? - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya sandip (at) puroga.com http://www.sandipb.net GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Re: Lotus Notes on Linux!
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: Buy crossover office (http://www.codeweavers.com) ($60) and install the client in it. This is the Lotus/IBM recommended method of using the client on linux. Scenario 1: Company uses Linux(or GNU/Linux) Employee wants to use Windows Advice: Employee can pay for License and use it and needs to figure out if all Linux services will work on it. ( As an example try locating an NIS client for the latest version of Windows which apart from accessing file and print services would also know what to do with other maps esp. ethers amongst others, I am assuming a sadistic System Admin who has turned off arp interfaces on the servers ) Scenario 2: Company uses Windows Advice: Employee can use Linux but needs to buy proprietary software to use some of the services on the primarily proprietary software based network. Advice: Continue to use Windows, install Cygwin and Free Software from GNUWinII and wait till you are able to use the proprietary software based network services. Supplying the necessary material for a potentially explosive flamewar and watching from sidelines. -Tarun ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: Lotus Notes on Linux!
Tarun has spoken the golden words. Supreet ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
RE: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi Shekhar,
Thanks for your concern dear but still no luck
Here is wht is happening
if u do an nslookup...
1.) does the query go to the primary Name server? {it shld go} yes
2.) does it resolvce the domain?? {it shld resolve} yes
3.) does it telnet (port 25)to the MX by IP address?? If by MX you mean
y relay server address then yes also to my own sever I am able to telnet
at port 25
4.) Does it telnet (port 25) to the MX by FQDN?? FQDN??? Couldn't get it
m sorry
as I told you I made the following changes in sendmail.cf
DSmailrelayerverip.com
O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=0.0.0.0, Name=MTA
That is it
Is ther anything need to be changed in access domaintable .
Also I have put an entry in /etc/hosts
Saying my mailrelayserver name and ip thts it
Hope I am clear with my setup now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of V Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 5:30 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: Re: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Manoj...
Revery in case of problems.. and try yto be descriptive in answer.. or
else i dont hv any pointers ...
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:58 pm
Subject: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi I checked /etc/resolv.conf put my local domain there
Still no luck
Need Help !! :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
delhi.org] On
Behalf Of V Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:40 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: Re: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
sendmail is unable to get the MX record of the domain, kindly see if
DNS is properly configured, and you can get the MX for the domain, by
issuing NSLOOKUP command on the mailserver.
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:38 pm
Subject: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi All,
I am stuck with a strange problemin sendmail
I m trying to send mail on internet using sendmail
I have put my ISP mail relay server in DS tab of sendmail.cf
Also m able to telnet the relay server from my m/c at port 25
Also the netstat shows like this
tcp0 0 *:smtp *:*
LISTEN
but when I try sending mail to anywhere outside say abc.com it says
connecting to abc.com via esmtp
and then says no route to host
even a mail to the mail relay server domain says the same
Is there anyone who has configured sendmail earlier and can help
me in
this regard
Thanks
manoj
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at
Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Virus scanned by ERNET-NOC
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at
Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Virus scanned by ERNET-NOC
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this
message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged
information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or [EMAIL
PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Gna!, A New Host for Libre Software Development
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Looks like we got another one! - - Gna!, A New Host for Libre Software Development[0] A new software hosting platform is available, and we are spreading the word. - - [0] http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/1099/ [0] --- - - Dear Free Software friends, Gna!, a self-organized development hosting facility, is now available to all Libre Software developers and users at http://gna.org/. It was created in January 2004 and is offering the same services as Savannah (http://savannah.gnu.org/) and SourceForge (http:// sf.net/). - --- Regards, Arjun -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFAMgpP9mAtgws7e1wRAq9/AJ9lcqrTOYzNSGMuR6vHI/JMNeby5gCdESMM M43WgJB8QwPOtNxiaVRLnlY= =x4tm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Updating linux-delhi.org website
Dear All, Can someone Please take some initiative to update linux-delhi.org with current LinuxAsia2004 pics. Still anyone can see the 2 years old Banglore IT.com event on TOP. Regards, -Yash ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: RE: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Manoj.
I suggest u change
DSmailrelayerverip.com
to
DSMail.Relay.IPV4.ADDRESS
eg
DS192.168.100.1
and see if it works.
one point to note is, that ur ISP relay server shld allow u to relay
SMTP. (But it does not hv to do the problem u r facing now)
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 6:02 pm
Subject: RE: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi Shekhar,
Thanks for your concern dear but still no luck
Here is wht is happening
if u do an nslookup...
1.) does the query go to the primary Name server? {it shld go} yes
2.) does it resolvce the domain?? {it shld resolve} yes
3.) does it telnet (port 25)to the MX by IP address?? If by MX you
meany relay server address then yes also to my own sever I am able
to telnet
at port 25
4.) Does it telnet (port 25) to the MX by FQDN?? FQDN??? Couldn't
get it
m sorry
as I told you I made the following changes in sendmail.cf
DSmailrelayerverip.com
O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=0.0.0.0, Name=MTA
That is it
Is ther anything need to be changed in access domaintable .
Also I have put an entry in /etc/hosts
Saying my mailrelayserver name and ip thts it
Hope I am clear with my setup now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
delhi.org] On
Behalf Of V Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 5:30 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: Re: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Manoj...
Revery in case of problems.. and try yto be descriptive in
answer.. or
else i dont hv any pointers ...
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:58 pm
Subject: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi I checked /etc/resolv.conf put my local domain there
Still no luck
Need Help !! :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
delhi.org] On
Behalf Of V Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:40 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: Re: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
sendmail is unable to get the MX record of the domain, kindly
see if
DNS is properly configured, and you can get the MX for the
domain, by
issuing NSLOOKUP command on the mailserver.
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:38 pm
Subject: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi All,
I am stuck with a strange problemin sendmail
I m trying to send mail on internet using sendmail
I have put my ISP mail relay server in DS tab of sendmail.cf
Also m able to telnet the relay server from my m/c at port 25
Also the netstat shows like this
tcp0 0 *:smtp *:*
LISTEN
but when I try sending mail to anywhere outside say abc.com it
says connecting to abc.com via esmtp
and then says no route to host
even a mail to the mail relay server domain says the same
Is there anyone who has configured sendmail earlier and can help
me in
this regard
Thanks
manoj
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at
Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Virus scanned by ERNET-NOC
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at
Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Virus scanned by ERNET-NOC
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ilugd] GPG on pine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thanks a lot for the link...this is exactly the kind of thing i was looking for. - --Rishabh - -- Rishabh Manocha http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/rmanocha **Your Quote for the day** In America any boy may become President, and I suppose that's just the risk he takes. Adlai Stevenson, US statesman, diplomat and lawyer, 1952 ** On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Arindam Dey wrote: On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 13:12, Rishabh Manocha wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hello all, I(and many others on my LAN) use pine to check our mail...i was recently handed the assingment to incorparate gpg onto our system to verify/encrypt e-mails. i can configure gpg to work with every mail reader including pine which does not have inbuild support for pgp/gpg. i have tried two plugins...MagicPGP and PGP4PINE.both work good(though pgp4pine is better).however there is one thing i cant seem to work out...how to make pine(or pgp4pine or magicpgp) cache my passphrase so that it does not ask for one everytime i try sending a mail. mutt does it and so do many of the graphical mail clients..i dont know or see why pine would not. Try this http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ I have not used it personally but was going through it and it claims to cater to your particular requirement under Other Features. I am sure some other regular pine users on the list will come up with far better suggestions than this. You may also like to see the section labeled Other Software. It has a few other options. Regards, -- Arindam Dey The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled. GPG FPR: B8E3 219E F129 F970 F4A7 BC50 9636 504A BEDF 5739 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBQDIr1cwJImN3jxQtEQL2SACgmuXHiAygHh6tzEwp1OuM7UQyz8EAoLeC bHzivkc1Tblj+BrnYB8sbrUo =b/6m -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Kernel version
On Monday 16 February 2004 13:43, you wrote: which version of redhat linux has kernel version less than 2.4.4 ? as redhat 8 has version 2.4.18 . not sure , but i think redhat linux 7.3 has 2.4.4 . but you can download it from http://kernel.org and recompile it easily. How can that be? I run redhat 7.2 and uname -r gives me 2.4.7-10. regards Ritesh Agrawal ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] rsh.... no tickets cashed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am facing a strange problem I just installed Rh 7.1 onmy system when I do rsh remote-server ls it says no lickets found and doesn't execute Looks like some problem with Kerberos But I don't want any Kerberos authentication So how to resolve it Kindly help That is because the kerberos enabled clients are getting invoked before the regular ones. If you dont use kerberos, remove the krb5-workstation package from your system: e.g. rpm -e krb5-workstation - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya sandip (at) puroga.com http://www.sandipb.net GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Possible additional feature for the list
Quoting Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So for example, we might have: 1. Events and other announcements: subject tag [announce]/[event] : topic - announce 2. Jobs/commercial: subject tag [jobs]/[job]/[opening]/[commercial] : topic - commercial 3. General: topic - default Any comments? - Sandip Agreed, but a forum is an equally good idea, and a good forum will have all these features, but if we are not lookin there, this is probably welcome. M - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
sendmail is unable to get the MX record of the domain This is the case when the mail server is unable to send mails on a single domain and its working perfect on other domains. ## but when I try sending mail to *anywhere* outside say abc.com it says ## connecting to abc.com via esmtp Then DNS may not be the prime issue rather relaying can be a problem. Contact your ISP, if they have properly given a relay to your IPs. Or you can make your own SMTP server without using the ISP one. Edit /etc/sendmail.cf and change 127.0.0.1 -- Public IP And vi /etc/mail/relay-domains and give the IP block of your network. You can use this as your SMTP server. HTH... BR, Gurpreet ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
RE: [ilugd] Updating linux-delhi.org website
Also Kindly upload the PICS of Newbie meet (Dec. 2003). Thanks and Regards, Gurpreet Singh Sachdeva Can someone Please take some initiative to update linux-delhi.org with current LinuxAsia2004 pics. ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] We are slashdotted - Indian Techies Answer About 'Onshore Insourcing'
[ Well roblimo has started off - one of his many promised articles is out. It is an interview with indian developers regarding questions that american/europian programmers, who are scared shit of outsourcing, would like to ask. - Sandip ] http://interviews.slashdot.org/interviews/04/02/17/1654255.shtml?tid=106tid=185tid=99 Posted by Roblimo on Tuesday February 17, @01:15PM This is an unusual Slashdot Interview, since instead of using email I asked all the questions in person last week either at LinuxAsia2004 or in casual meetings with local LUG members and other techies I met during the conference. Some of your questions were answered quite well by other Slashdot readers in the original post. (Slashdot has many readers both in and from India.) I also inserted a number of personal observations, which I usually don't do in these interviews, because it seemed to be the best way to answer some of the questions. And some questions were nearly unanswerable, as you'll see when you read the rest of this article. [...] [one of my favorite snippets ;) - Sandip ] After a few evenings hanging out with Delhi LUG guys (and yes, it's almost entirely guys), I realized that you could hold a joint meeting of the Delhi LUG and the Suncoast LUG here in Florida, and the only major differences would be the brands of beer ordered for the first round. The biggest argument would be over whose beer is better, followed by the ever-popular vi vs. emacs and KDE vs. Gnome controversies. Raj, from the Delhi LUG, and Logan, from the Suncoast LUG, would probably become huge buddies in about two seconds. I swear, if I closed my eyes while listening to Raj's bad jokes, sometimes I thought he was Logan -- and I mean this as a compliment to both of them. All the Delhi LUG crowd reads Slashdot. For the most part, they read the same science fiction books and watch the same movies as their U.S. counterparts. The ones who play guitar know pretty much the same songs -- and generally (*ahem*) play with the same great skill -- as Rob Malda. And the unmarried ones had the same complaints about never meeting appropriate girls, too. [...] - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya sandip (at) puroga.com http://www.sandipb.net GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] DLUG slashdotted
hi, linux-delhi.org has been slashdotted. http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/02/17/1654255mode=threadtid=106tid=185tid=99 raju may you have a happy holiday tomorrow. -- Cheers! Spo0nman. ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] (fwd)
[Please CC replies to the original poster -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: hrishi k [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:48:07 -0800 (PST) hi, iam Hrishikesh, a student from 8th sem engg (comp sci) and an IEEE member. i wanted some of the hot topics on LINUX to give a seminar. so please forward the topics of intrest. thanks. -- End of this Digest ** -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] please help me !!
dear all, At one of the PC I have installed win98/win2k/Mandrake 9.0. While installing Mandrake 9.0 I have assigned to /boot a 10 MB space (/dev/hda7) and with the help of bootable floppy in /etc I compiled lilo and then issued the command as dd if=/dev/hda7 of=bootsect.lnx count=1 bs=512 then copied this file to /mnt/win_c. Though linux is booted without any problem using win2k bootloader (boot.ini) but it takes approximately 4-5 minutes. But when I try to load the linux with the bootable floppy my same linux is booted within seconds. Please guide where I am making a mistake. I have installed linux twicely but of no avail. A valuable guide for this will be appreciable. in nutshell why booting linux from bootable floppy is fast whether from hard disk's boot sector ie. /dev/hda9 is slow. Best regards MALKIAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! MALKIAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] rsh.... no tickets cashed
Manoj == manoj thakkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Manoj Hi All, Manoj I am facing a strange problem I just installed Rh 7.1 onmy Manoj system when I do rsh remote-server ls it says no lickets Manoj found and doesn't execute Looks like some problem with Manoj Kerberos But I don't want any Kerberos authentication So Manoj how to resolve it Kindly help Use ssh. Manoj Confidentiality Notice Manoj The information contained in this electronic message and Manoj any attachments to this message are intended for the Manoj exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain Manoj confidential or privileged information. If you are not the Manoj intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or Manoj [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately and destroy all copies of Manoj this message and any attachments. Oops, sorry! I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I didn't read this message. I've destroyed this message. Ignore whatever I said earlier. Please do not sue me! -- Raju -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Possible additional feature for the list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mairu == Mairu Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mairu Quoting Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So for example, we might have: 1. Events and other announcements: subject tag [announce]/[event] : topic - announce 2. Jobs/commercial: subject tag [jobs]/[job]/[opening]/[commercial] : topic - commercial 3. General: topic - default Any comments? - Sandip Mairu Agreed, but a forum is an equally good idea, and a good Mairu forum will have all these features, but if we are not Mairu lookin there, this is probably welcome. A forum is possible, but not on linux-delhi.org -- all the forum software names that I've seen so far are riddled with security holes, and I wouldn't want to make the server even more insecure than it is presently. If anyone would like to host a forum on a separate machine located somewhere else, I'd be glad to (a) ask Nishikant to make a link to it from the linux-delhi.org web site and (b) add forum.linux-delhi.org to the DNS. BTW, plans for an announce-only list are underway. Regards, - -- Raju - -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard http://www.gnupg.org/ iD8DBQFAMt+TyWjQ78xo0X8RAkafAJ9TzLdy5O28PW4d1xMq0vO9Lz5kegCeIlvj GXpM4JIzkvFw2uNVA7Ey0EQ= =wqnS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: RE: RE: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Manoj,
if u r able to telnet to ISP's server on PORT25 , it does not mean u r
allowed or able to relay,
relay chk happend once u type in the TO: address
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:37 pm
Subject: RE: RE: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi shekhar
Still no luck
My ISP allow me to relay as m able to telnet at port 25 of their relay
server from my m/c
What to do ??? anyone who has faced similar problem before
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
delhi.org] On
Behalf Of V Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 7:42 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: Re: RE: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Manoj.
I suggest u change
DSmailrelayerverip.com
to
DSMail.Relay.IPV4.ADDRESS
eg
DS192.168.100.1
and see if it works.
one point to note is, that ur ISP relay server shld allow u to relay
SMTP. (But it does not hv to do the problem u r facing now)
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 6:02 pm
Subject: RE: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi Shekhar,
Thanks for your concern dear but still no luck
Here is wht is happening
if u do an nslookup...
1.) does the query go to the primary Name server? {it shld go} yes
2.) does it resolvce the domain?? {it shld resolve} yes
3.) does it telnet (port 25)to the MX by IP address?? If by MX you
meany relay server address then yes also to my own sever I am able
to telnet
at port 25
4.) Does it telnet (port 25) to the MX by FQDN?? FQDN??? Couldn't
get it
m sorry
as I told you I made the following changes in sendmail.cf
DSmailrelayerverip.com
O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=0.0.0.0, Name=MTA
That is it
Is ther anything need to be changed in access domaintable .
Also I have put an entry in /etc/hosts
Saying my mailrelayserver name and ip thts it
Hope I am clear with my setup now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
delhi.org] On
Behalf Of V Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 5:30 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: Re: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Manoj...
Revery in case of problems.. and try yto be descriptive in
answer.. or
else i dont hv any pointers ...
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:58 pm
Subject: RE: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi I checked /etc/resolv.conf put my local domain there
Still no luck
Need Help !! :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
delhi.org] On
Behalf Of V Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:40 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: Re: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
sendmail is unable to get the MX record of the domain, kindly
see if
DNS is properly configured, and you can get the MX for the
domain, by
issuing NSLOOKUP command on the mailserver.
Warm Regards.
- V SHEKHAR -
Tel : 040-23553343 ext 285
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:38 pm
Subject: [ilugd] sendmail problem :(
Hi All,
I am stuck with a strange problemin sendmail
I m trying to send mail on internet using sendmail
I have put my ISP mail relay server in DS tab of sendmail.cf
Also m able to telnet the relay server from my m/c at port 25
Also the netstat shows like this
tcp0 0 *:smtp *:*
LISTEN
but when I try sending mail to anywhere outside say abc.com it
says connecting to abc.com via esmtp
and then says no route to host
even a mail to the mail relay server domain says the same
Is there anyone who has configured sendmail earlier and can help
me in
this regard
Thanks
manoj
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at
Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
[ilugd] ILUG-D: Contact Us
[Forwarding without prejudice -- Raju] Message from Avinesh Bangar: I am aware of the bandwidth situation in India. Therefore, I am willing to mail out (from Canada) Linux distributions to members of your LUG for the fee of the media ($1/CD) and shipping/postage. ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Possible additional feature for the list
Quoting Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The problem with forum is that it will try to split the readers - one would either read the mails or read the forum - people dont have time for both. E..no, we'll have a opt-in for the mails, which can have the forum summary of the day being sent to all those wish to get that in text format. Some major positives that i find from the forum community is : High Popularity For ILUG-D Better Linux Awareness Archives more accessible for newbies Attractive and more friendly environment for newbies Organized Moderated discussion possible More community feel Negatives : Bandwidth/Hosting Time We already have a core community with which we can begin the forum in a very big and active way, the next best thing to do.. M - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] ILUG-D: Contact Us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Forwarding without prejudice -- Raju] Message from Avinesh Bangar: I am aware of the bandwidth situation in India. Therefore, I am willing to mail out (from Canada) Linux distributions to members of your LUG for the fee of the media ($1/CD) and shipping/postage. Thanks for your kindness, Avinesh. As you said, it's very difficult(and expensive) to get latest Linux distributions in India. But $1 will be around Rs 45 and postage will be at least Rs 100. So when it reaches India, it's going to be expensive. Most users here has got dial up connection through which downloading an entire distribution is impossible(??). I faced the same problems earlier, but now I have got a broadband connection - 256Kbps RF link - and to help others, I am 'distributing' cds at the price of media. Thanks Regards, Mejo Jose http://linux.mejokj.com ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Fedora Core 2 test 1 CD available
Hi! I needed Fedora Core 2 preview releases for some work so I downloaded Fedora Core 2 test 1. Those who want to experiment with kernel 2.6.x can get this distrib from me according to the instructions at http://www.sandipb.net/drupal/book/view/44 BTW, Fedora core 2 is coming in 4 CDs now. :) - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya sandip (at) puroga.com Work: http://www.puroga.comHome: http://www.sandipb.net GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Possible additional feature for the list
Mairu Gupta wrote: E..no, we'll have a opt-in for the mails, which can have the forum summary of the day being sent to all those wish to get that in text format. And how will the people respond to forum posting summaries ? Checking and responding to emails is far easier than checking the forum website. Here are the points why forum is a bad idea - Checking and responding to emails is far easier than checking a website, logging into it and posting a reply. - If we allow posting of anonymous users, we will have to deal with spam. If we require users to register before posting a message, will the search engines be able to search and archive the discussions ? - If anonymous postings is allowed, who will deal with weeding out the spam? We are all volunteers, so someone will have to take additional responsibilities. The question is who ? What happens if the volunteer get slack in his duties ? I vote against the forum idea. -- / \__ (@\___Raj Shekhar / O My home : http://geocities.com/lunatech3007/ / (_/My blog : http://lunatech.journalspace.com/ /_/ U ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Possible additional feature for the list
all great sites have forum, we should have forum, i vote in favour of having the forum, the reason : thread view is possible and archives are maintained, this way person who joins this list will scan thru already posted ques and will not put up already discussed questions again. am i right? amit --- Raj Shekhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mairu Gupta wrote: E..no, we'll have a opt-in for the mails, which can have the forum summary of the day being sent to all those wish to get that in text format. And how will the people respond to forum posting summaries ? Checking and responding to emails is far easier than checking the forum website. Here are the points why forum is a bad idea - Checking and responding to emails is far easier than checking a website, logging into it and posting a reply. - If we allow posting of anonymous users, we will have to deal with spam. If we require users to register before posting a message, will the search engines be able to search and archive the discussions ? - If anonymous postings is allowed, who will deal with weeding out the spam? We are all volunteers, so someone will have to take additional responsibilities. The question is who ? What happens if the volunteer get slack in his duties ? I vote against the forum idea. -- / \__ (@\___ Raj Shekhar / OMy home : http://geocities.com/lunatech3007/ / (_/ My blog : http://lunatech.journalspace.com/ /_/ U ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] changing the mailing list sig
Currently the mailing list appends a footer `` ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd `` to the emails. To reflect the changing times and traditions can the mail admin change this to `` ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi `` if it is not too much of trouble. It seems not many people are aware of the existence of gmane. -- / \__ (@\___Raj Shekhar / O My home : http://geocities.com/lunatech3007/ / (_/My blog : http://lunatech.journalspace.com/ /_/ U ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: Possible additional feature for the list
dear abhijit, are you one of those who like to see few hundred of mail getting downloaded in the inbox? i still fail to understand how come this email view of ilugd better than the proposed forum view? amit --- Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 2004-02-17 22:01:46 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: all great sites have forum, we should have forum I am completely convinced by your exemplary logic. thread view is possible and archives are maintained, this way person who joins this list will scan thru already posted ques and will not put up already discussed questions again. am i right? No, you're hopelessly wrong. -- ams ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Sendmail - How to put restrictions.....?
hi, i am using sendmail-8.12.5-7 on red hat 8.0. it works fine and no problems as such. now i want to put some restrictions on mails that are send by my local users to the outside world. i want that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is only allowed to send mails to outside world as well as local users ( at mydomain.com. all other users (say 15 others) should not be allowed to send out a mail to outisde world but they should be allowed to send mail among them (i.e. to users of mydoamin.com) i have fair idea that this can be done thru /etc/mail/access. but am i right? please tell me how do i implement the above mentioned restriction. amit __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] kenel programming book?
D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which is the best book for kernel programming?And how can I get it? Read books in this order: 1. Design of the Unix operating system/Operating systems: design and implementation by tanenbaum I think you meant Design of the Unix Operating System by Maurice J. Bach :) I meant either/and the maurice bach book or/and the tanenbaum book. They overlap in content a bit. - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya sandip (at) puroga.com Work: http://www.puroga.comHome: http://www.sandipb.net GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: Possible additional feature for the list
Amit Sharma wrote: dear abhijit, are you one of those who like to see few hundred of mail getting downloaded in the inbox? :D No. I would rather download hundreds of mails in my browser rendered with hundreds of kb of HTML. Come on, dont you get it? With every mail - there you go click on next, wait for the world-wide-wait to give you the next mail? How on earth can forums on the web be more bandwidth friendly than email? And you download all the mails only once if you use a mailing list! What do you do in case of forums? - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya sandip (at) puroga.com Work: http://www.puroga.comHome: http://www.sandipb.net GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [SPAM] [ilugd] IP ROUTING - IP MASQUREDINg
Hi Arindam, I noticed ur query today only. I assume that you are trying to run Internet from a PC/LAN connected to another multihomed PC connected to both ur ISP and local Lan. Attached is a script file firewall.tar.zip which will solve ur problem. There contains two files... rc.firewall and init/firewall You need to edit the rc.firewall file by looking for EXTIP and INTIP varibles and change their values to what u are having for ur network. And thats it.. The file will provide you pretty secure firewall along with NAT supported LAN. The second step is to copy the file rc.firewall to /etc/rc.d/ and the init/firewall to /etc/rc.d/init.d/ The last step is to enable the service firewall using chkconfig -add command. Now you should start the firewall by using service firewall start. This firewall script will automatically start as service when you will boot next time. I hope this will solve ur problems. Enjoy:) MKG - Original Message - From: Arindam Dey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: The Linux-Delhi Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:24 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] [ilugd] IP ROUTING - IP MASQUREDINg On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 17:25, Chithirai Selvan.R Alias Vimal thus hollered from the roof: this is my setup. i have redhat 9.0 kernel 2.4.20-8 smp i686(firewall m/c) gateway redhat 9.0(kernel 2.4.20-8) i have preconfigured DSL router ip addr-192.168.1.1 and two linux server connect in loop 1 gateway server 2. Firewall server gateway m/c is connect with DSL router it has 2 NIC card the first NIC card (eth1)ip-192.168.1.5 --connected to DSL router ip add 192.168.1.1 the second NIC card (eth0)ip-192.168.2.1 which is connectd with Firewall again it also has 2 nic card eth0- 192.168.2.1 -connectd with eth0 of gateway m/c as i said earler eth1 - 192.168.10.1 this is connect with my all clients. i can ping from firewall server to both NIC cards of gateway machine not the DSL router ..i tried with single m/c as intranet gateway which is working fine commands i tried is iptables -F -t nat iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o 192.168.1.5 -j MASQUERADE iptables -A FORWARD -i 192.168.10.1 -j ACCEPT this setup is when i don t have firewall now i insert the firewall m/c trouble startd Since nobody replied to the query,it seems the big guns who understand iptables are busy with Linux Asia so I will try answering the question. Again my oft mentioned quip holds true. If I am wrong then the person who corrects me is welcome to whack me on the head, albeit softly. Firstly would somebody please clarify this for me iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o 192.168.1.5 -j MASQUERADE The -o is supposed to be the out interface and I used to think something like eth? but on trying out the above command just out of curiosity it worked fine so does this mean interface can also be specified using the ip Could not figure out from the man page. Somebody please help out here. Secondly to the query at hand To configure iptables if you are not familiar with all the options try out Shorewall. http://www.shorewall.net . This is just a front end for configuring iptables. I did not understand on which machine you tried the above iptables commands. Should be the firewall but then at the end you mention that this setup is when I don't have a firewall now I insert firewall m/c so this comment threw me off. But still from what little I understood about your setup and assuming both the firewall and gateway are connected. A small side note here from what you have written above both your gateway(eth1) and Firewall(eth0) have the same ip of 192.168.2.1! Is that just a typo or it is actually like that huh? Please assign unique ip's to them. Say make the firewall(eth0) 192.168.2.1/24 and the gateway (eth1) 192.168.2.2/24 Then try these entries on your iptables. I am assuming the net mask is 255.255.255.0 on all the three networks dot 1, dot 2 and dot 10. If not modify the commands accordingly On the firewall iptables -t nat -F iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.10.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j MASQUERADE The above will masquerade anything coming from any machine on the dot 10 network (all clients) going anywhere. If you do not want to masquerade everything and only those destined for the dot 2 network (firewall-gateway) then modify 0.0.0.0/0 accordingly to 192.168.2.0/24 or something similar depends on your requirements. Alternatively if you want you can also modify the from (-s) to allow only incoming from some particular ip's. Again it is what you need. The above holds true for the nat table on the gateway also. Modify that too accordingly.But if I am not mistaken you want to access internet through this setup on the client pc's so I would suggest leaving it as 0.0.0.0/0. On the gateway iptables -t nat -F iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.2.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j
Re: [ilugd] Re: Possible additional feature for the list
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:12, Amit Sharma wrote: dear abhijit, are you one of those who like to see few hundred of mail getting downloaded in the inbox? many of the users ( gurus, who provide majority of the help) access their mails while in office. it is not possible for them, nor would they ever in their life prefer, to keep on going to the website, click Reload and see if anything is there to which they can answer. will yu do that? why would anyone spend his/er time searching for new topics to which s/he can answer? against the forum P.S. Hi ams, vivek here, spv :-) -- \|||/ (o o) ooO-(_)-Ooo- | vivek| GPG Key:| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://exain.net/vike | || | Registered Linux User: #305493 | ( _ ) _| | | |_ (___| |___) ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] IP ROUTING - IP MASQUREDINg
Hi Arindam, I noticed ur query today only. I assume that you are trying to run Internet from a PC/LAN connected to another multihomed PC connected to both ur ISP and local Lan. Attached is a script file firewall.tar.zip which will solve ur problem. There contains two files... rc.firewall and init/firewall You need to edit the rc.firewall file by looking for EXTIP and INTIP varibles and change their values to what u are having for ur network. And thats it.. The file will provide you pretty secure firewall along with NAT supported LAN. The second step is to copy the file rc.firewall to /etc/rc.d/ and the init/firewall to /etc/rc.d/init.d/ The last step is to enable the service firewall using chkconfig -add command. Now you should start the firewall by using service firewall start. This firewall script will automatically start as service when you will boot next time. I hope this will solve ur problems. Enjoy:) MKG - Original Message - From: Arindam Dey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: The Linux-Delhi Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:24 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] [ilugd] IP ROUTING - IP MASQUREDINg On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 17:25, Chithirai Selvan.R Alias Vimal thus hollered from the roof: this is my setup. i have redhat 9.0 kernel 2.4.20-8 smp i686(firewall m/c) gateway redhat 9.0(kernel 2.4.20-8) i have preconfigured DSL router ip addr-192.168.1.1 and two linux server connect in loop 1 gateway server 2. Firewall server gateway m/c is connect with DSL router it has 2 NIC card the first NIC card (eth1)ip-192.168.1.5 --connected to DSL router ip add 192.168.1.1 the second NIC card (eth0)ip-192.168.2.1 which is connectd with Firewall again it also has 2 nic card eth0- 192.168.2.1 -connectd with eth0 of gateway m/c as i said earler eth1 - 192.168.10.1 this is connect with my all clients. i can ping from firewall server to both NIC cards of gateway machine not the DSL router ..i tried with single m/c as intranet gateway which is working fine commands i tried is iptables -F -t nat iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o 192.168.1.5 -j MASQUERADE iptables -A FORWARD -i 192.168.10.1 -j ACCEPT this setup is when i don t have firewall now i insert the firewall m/c trouble startd Since nobody replied to the query,it seems the big guns who understand iptables are busy with Linux Asia so I will try answering the question. Again my oft mentioned quip holds true. If I am wrong then the person who corrects me is welcome to whack me on the head, albeit softly. Firstly would somebody please clarify this for me iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o 192.168.1.5 -j MASQUERADE The -o is supposed to be the out interface and I used to think something like eth? but on trying out the above command just out of curiosity it worked fine so does this mean interface can also be specified using the ip Could not figure out from the man page. Somebody please help out here. Secondly to the query at hand To configure iptables if you are not familiar with all the options try out Shorewall. http://www.shorewall.net . This is just a front end for configuring iptables. I did not understand on which machine you tried the above iptables commands. Should be the firewall but then at the end you mention that this setup is when I don't have a firewall now I insert firewall m/c so this comment threw me off. But still from what little I understood about your setup and assuming both the firewall and gateway are connected. A small side note here from what you have written above both your gateway(eth1) and Firewall(eth0) have the same ip of 192.168.2.1! Is that just a typo or it is actually like that huh? Please assign unique ip's to them. Say make the firewall(eth0) 192.168.2.1/24 and the gateway (eth1) 192.168.2.2/24 Then try these entries on your iptables. I am assuming the net mask is 255.255.255.0 on all the three networks dot 1, dot 2 and dot 10. If not modify the commands accordingly On the firewall iptables -t nat -F iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.10.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j MASQUERADE The above will masquerade anything coming from any machine on the dot 10 network (all clients) going anywhere. If you do not want to masquerade everything and only those destined for the dot 2 network (firewall-gateway) then modify 0.0.0.0/0 accordingly to 192.168.2.0/24 or something similar depends on your requirements. Alternatively if you want you can also modify the from (-s) to allow only incoming from some particular ip's. Again it is what you need. The above holds true for the nat table on the gateway also. Modify that too accordingly.But if I am not mistaken you want to access internet through this setup on the client pc's so I would suggest leaving it as 0.0.0.0/0. On the gateway iptables -t nat -F iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.2.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j
Re: [ilugd] Re: Possible additional feature for the list
different persons have different views well my vote still goes for forum. BTW, i have still to see a forum which is based on world-wide-wait ;) amit --- Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amit Sharma wrote: dear abhijit, are you one of those who like to see few hundred of mail getting downloaded in the inbox? :D No. I would rather download hundreds of mails in my browser rendered with hundreds of kb of HTML. Come on, dont you get it? With every mail - there you go click on next, wait for the world-wide-wait to give you the next mail? How on earth can forums on the web be more bandwidth friendly than email? And you download all the mails only once if you use a mailing list! What do you do in case of forums? - Sandip __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Re: Possible additional feature for the list
At 2004-02-17 22:42:26 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are you one of those who like to see few hundred of mail getting downloaded in the inbox? I'm certainly not one of those who like to sit around hitting reload on a bunch of web pages all day. I have to deal with a lot of email *anyway*, and my setup is optimised for just that. I'd prefer to continue to use the most efficient method I've evolved to deal with messages rather than learn a new one with a whole different behaviour and a new bunch of arbitrary limitations. i still fail to understand how come this email view of ilugd better than the proposed forum view? Email doesn't demand O(n) retrieval effort from the reader. And as for archives, the kind of people who would consult the archives before posting to the list would do so no matter how the archives were maintained. And the other people would ignore the archives, no matter where they were, just as they don't even bother to ask google before posting trivial questions. -- ams ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: Possible additional feature for the list
dear vivek, yes !! vivek your point(s) is a valid one. i agree with your point(s). amit --- vivek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:12, Amit Sharma wrote: dear abhijit, are you one of those who like to see few hundred of mail getting downloaded in the inbox? many of the users ( gurus, who provide majority of the help) access their mails while in office. it is not possible for them, nor would they ever in their life prefer, to keep on going to the website, click Reload and see if anything is there to which they can answer. will yu do that? why would anyone spend his/er time searching for new topics to which s/he can answer? against the forum P.S. Hi ams, vivek here, spv :-) -- \|||/ (o o) ooO-(_)-Ooo- | vivek| GPG Key:| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://exain.net/vike | || | Registered Linux User: #305493 | ( _ ) _| | | |_ (___| |___) ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Re: Possible additional feature for the list
i am falling short of explanations in favour of forum any body out there to help me :) amit --- Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 2004-02-17 22:42:26 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are you one of those who like to see few hundred of mail getting downloaded in the inbox? I'm certainly not one of those who like to sit around hitting reload on a bunch of web pages all day. I have to deal with a lot of email *anyway*, and my setup is optimised for just that. I'd prefer to continue to use the most efficient method I've evolved to deal with messages rather than learn a new one with a whole different behaviour and a new bunch of arbitrary limitations. i still fail to understand how come this email view of ilugd better than the proposed forum view? Email doesn't demand O(n) retrieval effort from the reader. And as for archives, the kind of people who would consult the archives before posting to the list would do so no matter how the archives were maintained. And the other people would ignore the archives, no matter where they were, just as they don't even bother to ask google before posting trivial questions. -- ams ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Mail Management Software
hi, i am looking for a complete Mail Managemrnt Software (based on ticketing). Compatible with sendmail and redhat 8.0. one of such solution is RT, other one is MailManager that runs on Zope. is there some other solution available? Requirement : when mail comes to my domian, a ticket gets generated and that ticket is kept open until that query has been completely answered. all this should be automatic i.e. it should get the mails from my sendmail server running on same machine. hope i am able to put my point forward. if any person/company is intrested in providing commercial solution to the above requirement , may reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] amit __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [SPAM] [ilugd] IP ROUTING - IP MASQUREDINg
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 15:13, Manoj K Gupta wrote: Hi Arindam, I noticed ur query today only. [Snip] On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 17:25, Chithirai Selvan.R Alias Vimal thus hollered from the roof: this is my setup. [Snip] - This is where I pop in trying to help not asking for it. Since nobody replied to the query, [Snip] Hello, Very nice and thoughtful of you trying to help. But please please go through the whole thread at least a cursory glance through it would have told you I am not asking for help albeit trying to give it. And please DO NOT TOP POST.(People who are against this no flames please this is just my view). Now the perennial question What is top posting? For that go here http://www.kandalaya.org/guidelines.html Spend a few minutes of your valuable time reading through it. And even if you do top post at least look through the crap that is there in the mail below it and [Snip] through it. And to the list-admin why oh why does this does particular persons mail always pop up twice in my mail box? Is it just me? Or is this guy trying to antagonize me because he is succeeding. Nah this time the same mail did not pop up twice our friend here sent the mail twice once after simply hitting the reply button and adding invaluable help to it. Second time he noticed the [SPAM] tag courtesy my Spamassassin on the subject line of the first mail and he went Oh my gosh, I should remove that! And SEND IT AGAIN! and removed it and sent it again within the minute. Why oh why did you do this? To everybody else sorry for the long rant. Regards, -- Arindam Dey The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled. GPG FPR: B8E3 219E F129 F970 F4A7 BC50 9636 504A BEDF 5739 ___ ilugd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
