RE: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-21 Thread Arik Baratz

-Original Message-
From: Boris Ratner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Now all customers suffer from this if their ISP got blocked by AOL.

And they should. They should suffer for choosing an ISP that disrespects its own 
acceptable use policy, and gets itself into some kind of blackhole or another. What 
the customer must do is switch to an ISP that actually enforces its AUP and doesn't 
get its address blocks blackholed. This is the ONLY way IMHO to convince an ISP to 
change their ways. Once large customers start doing their business elsewhere because 
of the ISP's incompetence, they will think twice before deleting the next abuse report.

-- Arik

To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-21 Thread Arie Folger
So what is it I should do? And who is blacklisted, I or my ISP? (I am, as I 
stated earlier, on a private IP from an ADSL router - that does have a public 
IP - connected to an ISP. My box is a plain vanilla RH9.)

Arie Folger

On Tuesday 21 October 2003 03:59, Boris Ratner wrote:
 I happen to stumble across the AOL antispam policies several times
 all large Israeli (might be international as well) ISPs suffer from those.

 Arie Folger wrote:
 We discussed this matter in the past, that AOL decided no longer to accept
 mail from servers that relay mail freely or have open proxies. The funny
 thing is that I am on a private network, and should therefore not be
  visible to the outside world, definitely not as a mail server. So, am I
  right to conclude that this complaint of AOL's is directed towards my
  ISP? Or is it towards the ADSL router of ours?

-- 
If an important person, out of humility, does not want to rely on [the Law, as 
applicable to his case], let him behave as an ascetic. However, permission 
was not granted to record this in a book, to rule this way for the future 
generations, and to be stringent of one's own accord, unless he shall bring 
clear proofs from the Talmud [to support his argument].
paraphrase of Rabbi Asher ben Ye'hiel, as quoted by Rabbi Yoel
Sirkis, Ba'h, Yoreh De'ah 187:9, s.v. Umah shekatav.


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-21 Thread Herouth Maoz
Quoting Arik Baratz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 What the customer must do is switch to an ISP that actually enforces
 its AUP and doesn't get its address blocks blackholed. This is the ONLY way
 IMHO to convince an ISP to change their ways.

Great. I don't know which ISPs AOL blocks, but I assume based on my own past
spams that these include Internet Zahav, Netvision, 012, Actcom, and if I'm not
mistaken, Barak. Now tell me which viable option can I have for an ISP in Israel
that knows how to spell Linux, and is not a lying cheat (like, say, Aquanet).

Herouth

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-21 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
AB And they should. They should suffer for choosing an ISP that
AB disrespects its own acceptable use policy, and gets itself into
AB some kind of blackhole or another. What the customer must do is

Oh come on. It is a common knowledge that at least some of these relays
are too quick to add whole netblocks and too slow to explain why they did
that or how to make this not happen again. And the ISP couldn't care less
what some freak out there thinks about its policies - its responcibility
is its own paying clients and not convinvcing some trigger-happy sysadmin
jumping out of his pants to be BOFH-like and blacklist whatever possible
without too much investigation.

It is impossible to prevent sending email from a customer of an ISP to any
address on the internet - be the mail contents UCE or not. It is not
possible for the ISP to know if the content of the message is UCE or not.
So what the hell you want them to do? Cut their own throats by terminating
contracts with paying customers just because some obsucre email address
claiming to be sysadmin demands that?

This all spam blocking fun have gotten by far out of proportion nowdays.
Every week, and later - almost every other day I hear from legitimate
users having their legitimate emails blocked because of some
spamblocking usually from third-party relay lists that answer along
the line of somebody from your country once sent spam, so we blocked the
whole class A - if you want to send email again, you better choose another
country to live or piss off.
Do you propose for these users to start hopping ISPs (on the way
convincing  all relatives and acquaintances to change their address books)
in hope they will find one that would satisfy the spamblockers? Do
you really think this is the solution for anything? For the spammer to
change ISP is a matter of one configuration setting in his spam machine.
For the legitimate Joe User is like moving to another city. So who do you
want to punish?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   \/  There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev  /\  Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-50-624945/\  JRRT LotR.
whois:!SM8333



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-21 Thread Arik Baratz

-Original Message-
From: Herouth Maoz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Great. I don't know which ISPs AOL blocks, but I assume based on my own past
 spams that these include Internet Zahav, Netvision, 012, Actcom, and if I'm not
 mistaken, Barak. Now tell me which viable option can I have for an ISP in Israel
 that knows how to spell Linux, and is not a lying cheat (like, say, Aquanet).

Well, you can start by moving to a different ISP, explaining them why you did. Then 
you should choose the one with the best record... If none of them is perfect, choose 
the least worse.

-- Arik

To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-21 Thread linux-il
Arik Baratz wrote:

-Original Message-
From: Herouth Maoz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Great. I don't know which ISPs AOL blocks, but I assume based on my own past
spams that these include Internet Zahav, Netvision, 012, Actcom, and if I'm not
mistaken, Barak. Now tell me which viable option can I have for an ISP in Israel
that knows how to spell Linux, and is not a lying cheat (like, say, Aquanet).


Well, you can start by moving to a different ISP, explaining them why you did. Then you should choose the one with the best record... If none of them is perfect, choose the least worse.
Yes, and don't forget to put an elephant at the end to make sure the
algorithm will terminate.
:-)

--Amos



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-21 Thread Arik Baratz

-Original Message-
From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

AB And they should. They should suffer for choosing an ISP that
AB disrespects its own acceptable use policy, and gets itself into
AB some kind of blackhole or another. What the customer must do is

 Oh come on. It is a common knowledge that at least some of these relays
 are too quick to add whole netblocks and too slow to explain why they did
 that or how to make this not happen again. And the ISP couldn't care less
 what some freak out there thinks about its policies - its responcibility
 is its own paying clients and not convinvcing some trigger-happy sysadmin
 jumping out of his pants to be BOFH-like and blacklist whatever possible
 without too much investigation.

As I see it, depending on who you are and how important it is for your messages to get 
'there'.

If you're a corporate and contact mostly other corporates, mostly you don't care. I 
know I don't. If someone from my company wants to send mail to someone with an RBL 
that doesn't let my static IP (I don't use the IP relay, heavens forbid) send him mail 
- I'm fine with that. The person on the other side will have to find a way to accept 
this mail message, because it's also his priority to do business with us.

If you're a private person, or contact mostly private people, that's damn annoying. In 
the rare occasions I have encountered it I opted to use a different provider to send a 
message telling that person that they are using an RBL and he should do something 
about it.

Personally I use a BezeqInt ISDN line to send and receive email, and it seems like 
this IP range is pretty much okay. I had it blocked once, and the BezeqInt guys went 
out of their way to un-block it.

But BezeqInt is guilty of spamming me themselves, for which I did never forgive them. 
I have stopped buying new services from them and I am slowly switching.

There should really be an Israeli ISP monitoring site, which will score ISPs based on 
their non-blackholeness, but I am not the one who will set it up so I have no right to 
speak about it.

You're right about RBL admins that are too trigger happy, but I never encountered a 
case when I asked to be removed (when I had my own address range) and not removed 
within a few days. Yes, some ignoramus has misconfigured a mail server on my range, 
and I picked up the pieces.

And regarding the ISP's responsibility for the customer - the quick BezeqInt reaction 
came after I have told them that since I use their network to send email, and it is 
important to me that the email gets there, I hold them responsible for any blackholing 
of their range and will switch if I can't send my email decently from my equipment.

-- Arik

To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-21 Thread Arik Baratz

  Well, you can start by moving to a different ISP, explaining them
  why you did. Then you should choose the one with the best record...
  If none of them is perfect, choose the least worse.

 Yes, and don't forget to put an elephant at the end to make sure the
 algorithm will terminate.

Do you want to open the Israeli ISP-monitoring site? You can rate the
ISPs based on the precentage of their address ranges that are black-holed.
The position is yours if you accept :-)

-- Arik

To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-21 Thread Rony Shapiro
Actually, there is a company that does Israeli ISP rating. Their metrics are
more performance and reliability oriented, but I don't see why they can't
add block-IPs as a metric, at least in principle

http://www.marnetics.com/ISPrating.asp

Disclaimer: I have no interest, commercial or otherwise in this company. I
have never used their service, and have no idea regarding the quality of
their data, or lack of thereof.

Cheers,

Rony

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arik Baratz
 Sent: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:18
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email



 -Original Message-
 From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 AB And they should. They should suffer for choosing an ISP that
 AB disrespects its own acceptable use policy, and gets itself into
 AB some kind of blackhole or another. What the customer must do is

  Oh come on. It is a common knowledge that at least some of these relays
  are too quick to add whole netblocks and too slow to explain
 why they did
  that or how to make this not happen again. And the ISP couldn't
 care less
  what some freak out there thinks about its policies - its responcibility
  is its own paying clients and not convinvcing some
 trigger-happy sysadmin
  jumping out of his pants to be BOFH-like and blacklist whatever possible
  without too much investigation.

 As I see it, depending on who you are and how important it is for
 your messages to get 'there'.

 If you're a corporate and contact mostly other corporates, mostly
 you don't care. I know I don't. If someone from my company wants
 to send mail to someone with an RBL that doesn't let my static IP
 (I don't use the IP relay, heavens forbid) send him mail - I'm
 fine with that. The person on the other side will have to find a
 way to accept this mail message, because it's also his priority
 to do business with us.

 If you're a private person, or contact mostly private people,
 that's damn annoying. In the rare occasions I have encountered it
 I opted to use a different provider to send a message telling
 that person that they are using an RBL and he should do something
 about it.

 Personally I use a BezeqInt ISDN line to send and receive email,
 and it seems like this IP range is pretty much okay. I had it
 blocked once, and the BezeqInt guys went out of their way to un-block it.

 But BezeqInt is guilty of spamming me themselves, for which I did
 never forgive them. I have stopped buying new services from them
 and I am slowly switching.

 There should really be an Israeli ISP monitoring site, which will
 score ISPs based on their non-blackholeness, but I am not the one
 who will set it up so I have no right to speak about it.

 You're right about RBL admins that are too trigger happy, but I
 never encountered a case when I asked to be removed (when I had
 my own address range) and not removed within a few days. Yes,
 some ignoramus has misconfigured a mail server on my range, and I
 picked up the pieces.

 And regarding the ISP's responsibility for the customer - the
 quick BezeqInt reaction came after I have told them that since I
 use their network to send email, and it is important to me that
 the email gets there, I hold them responsible for any blackholing
 of their range and will switch if I can't send my email decently
 from my equipment.

 -- Arik

 ==
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-10-20 Thread Boris Ratner
Hi,

I happen to stumble across the AOL antispam policies several times
all large Israeli (might be international as well) ISPs suffer from those.
AOL have a self-developed heuristic anti-spam mechanism.
This program finds out who is the owner of the IP block that the spam 
message is sent from
and sends a complaint to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for every 
spam message recieved.
If the owner of the IP block passed a certain level of spam - AOL just 
block all IP addresses owned by that entity.
AOL done that because ISPs where saying We don't care if one of our 
clients spams AOL users.
Now all customers suffer from this if their ISP got blocked by AOL.

regards
Boris.
Arie Folger wrote:

Hi,

We discussed this matter in the past, that AOL decided no longer to accept 
mail from servers that relay mail freely or have open proxies. The funny 
thing is that I am on a private network, and should therefore not be visible 
to the outside world, definitely not as a mail server. So, am I right to 
conclude that this complaint of AOL's is directed towards my ISP? Or is it 
towards the ADSL router of ours?

Also, I mailed them a complaint letter why they shouldn't maintain such a 
policy, but they didn't even bother to reply.

Arie Folger
 



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email

2003-06-12 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003, Arie Folger wrote about AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying 
of email:
 to the outside world, definitely not as a mail server. So, am I right to 
 conclude that this complaint of AOL's is directed towards my ISP? Or is it 
 towards the ADSL router of ours?

We're missing a lot of information. How do you normally send email? Do you
send all the outgoing mail to your ISP's mail server, or do you send mail
directly from the ADSL-connected machine? If you use your ISP's mail server
for outgoing mail, what server is this?

Looking at your post, I see you sent it through 212.40.5.186, the mail
server of some Swiss ISP (?!). This mail server is not on any blacklist
that I know of, so I don't understand where your problem comes from. So to
try to help you, I'd need to see AOL's bounce, and an example of the full
headers of your outgoing mail.

 Also, I mailed them a complaint letter why they shouldn't maintain such a 
 policy, but they didn't even bother to reply.

For people like me, who get 5-10 times more spam than important email in
a day, not dealing with spam is not an option.

Certainly it would have been better if every user had the option of how to
deal with spam instead of the ISP defining ISP-wide blocks, but frankly
AOL's users have the right to switch ISP if the blocking bothers them.

-- 
Nadav Har'El| Thursday, Jun 12 2003, 12 Sivan 5763
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-
Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |Drink varnish and you'll get a lovely
http://nadav.harel.org.il   |finish.

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]