Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-07 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Steve G., from the post of Fri, 04 Oct:
 
 So I am thinking, maybe I should get an external network drive, or raid, or
 NAS, and use it to consolidate my drive and keep all my files in one place
 from now onward.

I have yet to see a cheap hardware off-the-shelf NAS that can beat a PC
in performance or flexibility. I would get three WD Red disks and build
a Linux machine around them, doesn't have to be too powerful. Don't
stick old drives in there, you want reliability. use RAID5 in software,
dm-crypt if you want some privacy, Samba, NFS and OwnClouׁ• like people
already suggested, and a very logical directory tree so you can find
everything easily.

Also - backup backup baskup. there are cheap cloud services where you
can have unlimited storagef for $20-$#0 a year, the better ones support
rsync. don't be too cheap, you want your data alive. Especially unique
stuff like family photos that can't be recovered from a torrent site...


-- 
Built by 100 monkeys with 100 typewriters
Ira Abramov
http://ira.abramov.org/email/

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-07 Thread Udi Finkelstein
Using a PC as a server has several drawbacks:
1. Size
2. Power consumption

A typical ARM based NAS will usually beat a PC in both categories.

BTW, for backing up pictures, if you don't use the RAW file format, you can
use flickr which offers free storage up to 1TB (you can mark all your files
private if you want).

Udi



On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ira Abramov lists-linux...@ira.abramov.org
 wrote:

 Quoting Steve G., from the post of Fri, 04 Oct:
 
  So I am thinking, maybe I should get an external network drive, or raid,
 or
  NAS, and use it to consolidate my drive and keep all my files in one
 place
  from now onward.

 I have yet to see a cheap hardware off-the-shelf NAS that can beat a PC
 in performance or flexibility. I would get three WD Red disks and build
 a Linux machine around them, doesn't have to be too powerful. Don't
 stick old drives in there, you want reliability. use RAID5 in software,
 dm-crypt if you want some privacy, Samba, NFS and OwnClouׁ• like people
 already suggested, and a very logical directory tree so you can find
 everything easily.

 Also - backup backup baskup. there are cheap cloud services where you
 can have unlimited storagef for $20-$#0 a year, the better ones support
 rsync. don't be too cheap, you want your data alive. Especially unique
 stuff like family photos that can't be recovered from a torrent site...


 --
 Built by 100 monkeys with 100 typewriters
 Ira Abramov
 http://ira.abramov.org/email/

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-07 Thread Amos Shapira
Still beta but I've just heard about it and it got me thinking about
something like this for myself one day: https://arkos.io/

The main problem I see with running my own server is that it depends on my
home ADSL line. Most of the time it shouldn't be a major problem but still
access will be slower and more limited compared to, for instance, GMail.


On 7 October 2013 20:13, Udi Finkelstein linux...@udif.com wrote:

 Using a PC as a server has several drawbacks:
 1. Size
 2. Power consumption

 A typical ARM based NAS will usually beat a PC in both categories.

 BTW, for backing up pictures, if you don't use the RAW file format, you
 can use flickr which offers free storage up to 1TB (you can mark all your
 files private if you want).

 Udi



 On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ira Abramov 
 lists-linux...@ira.abramov.org wrote:

 Quoting Steve G., from the post of Fri, 04 Oct:
 
  So I am thinking, maybe I should get an external network drive, or
 raid, or
  NAS, and use it to consolidate my drive and keep all my files in one
 place
  from now onward.

 I have yet to see a cheap hardware off-the-shelf NAS that can beat a PC
 in performance or flexibility. I would get three WD Red disks and build
 a Linux machine around them, doesn't have to be too powerful. Don't
 stick old drives in there, you want reliability. use RAID5 in software,
 dm-crypt if you want some privacy, Samba, NFS and OwnClouׁ• like people
 already suggested, and a very logical directory tree so you can find
 everything easily.

 Also - backup backup baskup. there are cheap cloud services where you
 can have unlimited storagef for $20-$#0 a year, the better ones support
 rsync. don't be too cheap, you want your data alive. Especially unique
 stuff like family photos that can't be recovered from a torrent site...


 --
 Built by 100 monkeys with 100 typewriters
 Ira Abramov
 http://ira.abramov.org/email/

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il



 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il




-- 
 [image: View my profile on LinkedIn]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gliderflyer
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-07 Thread Rabin Yasharzadehe
I did the math once, not worth it,

חפרתי קצת לגבי לוחות שלא זוללים הרבה חשמל ומצאתי כמה
 אבל היתה לי עכשיו שיחה ממש מעניינת עם בחור בשם יריב מאתר plonter
 הבחור לא איש שיווק אבל הוא תפר לי משהו יפיפיה מארז מעוצב ב-1500
 אני יכול לשחק טיפה עם הלוח אם ולקחת משהו חזק יותר אם צריך

 עוד משהו שיצא לבדוק, אם אני אשתמש בספק של 120W בערך העלות לשנה תהיה בערך
 350 שח
 ואז ההפרש בין QNAP 459 Pro+ II שצורך בערך 33W, למחשב רגיל יורד עד בערך
 200~ חיסכון לשנה

 אז יוצא שלקנות NAS תפור מראש יצא משהו  בערך של 5000~ שח
 והרכבה של מחשב מאפס תעלה לי גג 2000 שח

 הפרש של 3000 שקל שההחזר שלו במנות של 200 יהיה 15 שנה
 ולא נראה לי שאני יוכל להנות מ-QNAS עד 15 שנה :)

 עוד מוצר שיצא לי לבדוק הוא - HP ProLiant N36L
 העלות שלו היא בערך 1500 שח ונראה שניתן לפרמט ולהתקין עליו FREENAS



On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Udi Finkelstein linux...@udif.com wrote:

 Using a PC as a server has several drawbacks:
 1. Size
 2. Power consumption

 A typical ARM based NAS will usually beat a PC in both categories.

 BTW, for backing up pictures, if you don't use the RAW file format, you
 can use flickr which offers free storage up to 1TB (you can mark all your
 files private if you want).

 Udi



 On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ira Abramov 
 lists-linux...@ira.abramov.org wrote:

 Quoting Steve G., from the post of Fri, 04 Oct:
 
  So I am thinking, maybe I should get an external network drive, or
 raid, or
  NAS, and use it to consolidate my drive and keep all my files in one
 place
  from now onward.

 I have yet to see a cheap hardware off-the-shelf NAS that can beat a PC
 in performance or flexibility. I would get three WD Red disks and build
 a Linux machine around them, doesn't have to be too powerful. Don't
 stick old drives in there, you want reliability. use RAID5 in software,
 dm-crypt if you want some privacy, Samba, NFS and OwnClouׁ• like people
 already suggested, and a very logical directory tree so you can find
 everything easily.

 Also - backup backup baskup. there are cheap cloud services where you
 can have unlimited storagef for $20-$#0 a year, the better ones support
 rsync. don't be too cheap, you want your data alive. Especially unique
 stuff like family photos that can't be recovered from a torrent site...


 --
 Built by 100 monkeys with 100 typewriters
 Ira Abramov
 http://ira.abramov.org/email/

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il



 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il




-- 
*Rabin*
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-07 Thread vordoo

  
  

DO NOT USE RAID 5, Go for
1, 6, or 10 :
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/why-raid-5-stops-working-in-2009/162

 use flickr which offers free storage up to 1TB (you can mark
all your files private if you want)...
Marked or not, if you flickr privet it will not be anymore. Which
may be OK as long as you know.

  


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-07 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
There are plenty of cheap low-power mainboards available...
Intel Atom boards
AMD E-series
ARM stuff (pandaboard, beagleboard, and many more)
So you can build your own low-power solution that will use in the area
of 33W (though if you have lot's of disks I really don't see how you
would get that low a peak usage with more then 2 disks since the avg.
usage of a disk is about 10W, though that may have improved by now...)

And yes, RAID 6, 1, 10 or RAIDZ should be what you look at

Regards,
Eliyahu - אליהו


2013/10/7 vordoo vor...@yahoo.com:

 DO NOT USE RAID 5, Go for 1, 6, or 10 :
 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/why-raid-5-stops-working-in-2009/162

 use flickr which offers free storage up to 1TB (you can mark all your
 files private if you want)...
 Marked or not, if you flickr privet it will not be anymore. Which may be OK
 as long as you know.


 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-07 Thread Dotan Cohen
Are the drives spinning all the time? If the drives are not accessed
for some time (say, one hour) then I would expect the device to spin
them down.


On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:20 PM, E.S. Rosenberg esr+linux...@g.jct.ac.il wrote:
 There are plenty of cheap low-power mainboards available...
 Intel Atom boards
 AMD E-series
 ARM stuff (pandaboard, beagleboard, and many more)
 So you can build your own low-power solution that will use in the area
 of 33W (though if you have lot's of disks I really don't see how you
 would get that low a peak usage with more then 2 disks since the avg.
 usage of a disk is about 10W, though that may have improved by now...)

 And yes, RAID 6, 1, 10 or RAIDZ should be what you look at

 Regards,
 Eliyahu - אליהו


 2013/10/7 vordoo vor...@yahoo.com:

 DO NOT USE RAID 5, Go for 1, 6, or 10 :
 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/why-raid-5-stops-working-in-2009/162

 use flickr which offers free storage up to 1TB (you can mark all your
 files private if you want)...
 Marked or not, if you flickr privet it will not be anymore. Which may be OK
 as long as you know.


 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il



-- 
Dotan Cohen

http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-07 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2013/10/7 Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com:
 Are the drives spinning all the time? If the drives are not accessed
 for some time (say, one hour) then I would expect the device to spin
 them down.
Well that depends on the firmware/OS and the optimizations you add...
In prebuilt stuff I would also expect it, in self built stuff it
depends 100% on you.


 On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:20 PM, E.S. Rosenberg esr+linux...@g.jct.ac.il 
 wrote:
 There are plenty of cheap low-power mainboards available...
 Intel Atom boards
 AMD E-series
 ARM stuff (pandaboard, beagleboard, and many more)
 So you can build your own low-power solution that will use in the area
 of 33W (though if you have lot's of disks I really don't see how you
 would get that low a peak usage with more then 2 disks since the avg.
 usage of a disk is about 10W, though that may have improved by now...)

 And yes, RAID 6, 1, 10 or RAIDZ should be what you look at

 Regards,
 Eliyahu - אליהו


 2013/10/7 vordoo vor...@yahoo.com:

 DO NOT USE RAID 5, Go for 1, 6, or 10 :
 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/why-raid-5-stops-working-in-2009/162

 use flickr which offers free storage up to 1TB (you can mark all your
 files private if you want)...
 Marked or not, if you flickr privet it will not be anymore. Which may be OK
 as long as you know.


 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il



 --
 Dotan Cohen

 http://gibberish.co.il
 http://what-is-what.com

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-06 Thread vordoo

  
  
Short answer:

  
- cheaper than dirt, or at least double digits, not triple
  (in dollars)

  

Sorry this is not going to happen, adjust the figure  come back
later. 

Lookup one of the 'of the shelf' -W.D My Books, or whatever, home
NAS  systems. You can get or build one like these, copy all your
data:
- Slowly by browsing to the home-NAS web interface from your old
devices or PCs.
- Faster by connection to the home-NAS file share OR direct
connecting a USB adapter from home-NAS to the old IDE's or SD-cards.


If you D.I.Y you may get a better system. Maybe combine a new
router/firewall in the NAS to solve the two network, wired 
WiFi, problem. but the price will be more or less the same.


Because -...

Long Answer:
  


  - if it can handle IDE drives it would be awesome -
all my old drives are IDE , and it would be nice to continue
using them. 

  

Nope, it probably will be a bad idea to use the old disks, instead
of buying a one new big efficient HD:
- It will cost you more money to connect  use the old ones. If
you have a motherboard that can accept all of them, it will use a
lot more electricity, if you do not have one it will cost you on top
of that to get the old one's even connected.
- It will make a lot more noise, heat and you pay for damping 
cooling it.
- They are old  getting older, they are going to die soon, you
do back up:-)


  
If not, I need a solution to connect the older drives - at
  least so I can transfer the data without taking apart an older
  computer and physically mounting each drive.  

  

Your home-NAS will have it setup for you, by using NFS, SMB or a web
interface, whether built from scratch -running your own linux server
 services on hardware similar to the one's that are suggested
for FreeNAS projects, or proprietary solution. 

After you have setup the file share in the NAS, SAN or whatever you
can boot your old device/PC and move the data to the share:
- Slowly by browsing to the home-NAS web interface from your old
devices or PCs.
- Faster by connection to the home-NAS file share 
OR 
Take out the old IDE's, SD-card or whatever holds your data and plug
it with a USB adapter to the home-NAS.

See:  Open source implementations FreeNas, Openindiana,
Owncloud (not exactly a NAS but you may like it). And proprietary
solutions, W.D. My book or whatever.

  
- 2 drives (maybe more?)
  

Yep, but... as you ask that it be cheap, make sure you address the
backup before you spend on redundant disks -AS THEY ARE NOT
BACKUPS!. And, in today high density disks era, you DO NOT
use raid 5 -It is statistically  practically granted to
fail. Go for raid 1, 6 or 10.


  

- accessible by both wired and wireless connections, if
  possible
  

No problem, see above.

  
Questions:


1. What do I do if my wireless router has two IP networks,
  one for the wired computers and the other for the wireless (a
  real situation and also a real pain in the ass - wired
  computers and laptops could not reach one another)?

  

- You have an option in the router to use only one network or brig
the mandatory two.
- You have an option to change/upgrade the firmware to one that can
do the above. See: OpenWRT, DD-WRT, Tomato, etc.
- Get a new router or build a home-NAS that is a router too.
- Brig the networks on another device, build a home-NAS that is a
brig for the two networks.

  
2. Is there a simple way - or any way - to connect to the
  drive from several networks (because the cell phones have a
  different IP address, and also the wired and wireless devices
  might have separate IP addresses)?
  

Yes, you share the drive  connect with web or brig the
networks,  see above. 


HTH,
  


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-05 Thread Rabin Yasharzadehe


 On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Steve G. word...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am getting to a point that, between all the old computers I still own or
 use, the orphan hard drives from abandoned systems, and the dual boot
 laptops, I have a storage nightmare. I have photos, videos, articles,
 music, everywhere, and it is getting to the point that I can't access files
 because I don't know where they are or were, or because they are on drive
 that are no longer in use.

 So I am thinking, maybe I should get an external network drive, or raid,
 or NAS, and use it to consolidate my drive and keep all my files in one
 place from now onward.

 Any suggestions of devices, or where to look for them?

 Here is what I think it should look like:

 - OS agnostic - should play well with Linux, MacOS, Win7 or 8 (for
 future). If I can access it from tablets or smart phones (iOS or Android),
 even better.

 - if it can handle IDE drives it would be awesome - all my old drives are
 IDE , and it would be nice to continue using them.

 If not, I need a solution to connect the older drives - at least so I can
 transfer the data without taking apart an older computer and physically
 mounting each drive.

 - 2 drives (maybe more?)

 - accessible by both wired and wireless connections, if possible

 - I assume I would have to connect to the device directly to set up the
 IP, and from then on manage it remotely. If I can set the IP address
 without connecting (I remember headless servers that let you set the IP
 with a toggle on the device) life would be so much easier.

 - cheaper than dirt, or at least double digits, not triple (in dollars)

 Questions:

 1. What do I do if my wireless router has two IP networks, one for the
 wired computers and the other for the wireless (a real situation and also a
 real pain in the ass - wired computers and laptops could not reach one
 another)?

 2. Is there a simple way - or any way - to connect to the drive from
 several networks (because the cell phones have a different IP address, and
 also the wired and wireless devices might have separate IP addresses)?

 Thanks,

 Z.

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


​You can build your own NAS server from a old PC parts and run FreeNAS on
it.

as for IDE adapter you can buy one of this cheap adapter
 -
http://www.ebay.com/itm/USB-2-0-to-IDE-SATA-2-5-3-5-Hard-Drive-Disk-HDD-Converter-Adapter-Cable-/290760774098?pt=US_Drive_Cables_daptershash=item43b2b151d2
​​
but from experience - they tend to over heat and die - so i spend few more
dollars a bought the dock station version and i use my portable drive
transformer with it.
 -
http://www.ebay.com/itm/USB-3-5-2-5-IDE-SATA-HDD-Dual-Docking-Station-HUB-AC-Adapter-USB-Cable-/300907274121?pt=US_Drive_Enclosures_Dockshash=item460f789f89

no so long ago i was looking to build a NAS server for my self and I
compiled a list of some hardware parts i like to buy for this,
maybe it will help you, my total was over 2000 NIS (~600$), but you can
scale down the spec to fit your budget and needs.

​

580 x1 CASE - Antec P280
 # support for 6 drives with easy access

300 x1 CPU  - Intel Dual Core G2030 Ivy Bridge Box

390 x1 Motherboard  - ASRock H77M

425 x1 Memory   - Kit  Kingston 8GB DDR3 1600MHz KHX1600C9D3B1K2/8GX


 # check recommendation for raid - no GREEN drives

330 x3 DRIVES   - Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 1TB SATA3 / SATA2
# A single-parity RAIDZ (raidz) configuration at 3 disks (2+1)


 Total ~ 2000 NIS ​

​


-- 
*Rabin*
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Linux friendly NAS or networked drive/raid - perhaps wireless

2013-10-05 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2013/10/5 Steve G. word...@gmail.com:
 I am getting to a point that, between all the old computers I still own or
 use, the orphan hard drives from abandoned systems, and the dual boot
 laptops, I have a storage nightmare. I have photos, videos, articles, music,
 everywhere, and it is getting to the point that I can't access files because
 I don't know where they are or were, or because they are on drive that are
 no longer in use.

 So I am thinking, maybe I should get an external network drive, or raid, or
 NAS, and use it to consolidate my drive and keep all my files in one place
 from now onward.

 Any suggestions of devices, or where to look for them?
As Rabin says you can build one yourself, computer shops also carry
tons of them these days and most are essentially a linux embedded
device with some (proprietary) front-end.

 Here is what I think it should look like:

 - OS agnostic - should play well with Linux, MacOS, Win7 or 8 (for future).
 If I can access it from tablets or smart phones (iOS or Android), even
 better.
Linux - NFS, Samba, WebDAV, most any fs you can think of (though
if you want your home to live there you need a POSIX compliant fs to
avoid major PITAs)

 - if it can handle IDE drives it would be awesome - all my old drives are
 IDE , and it would be nice to continue using them.
Are you sure you want to invest the electricity in oparting lots of
old drives when you can probably migrate all the data on them to one
new drive and still have room to spare? (obviously it should be one
set of drives with proper data security in mind but the idea).

 If not, I need a solution to connect the older drives - at least so I can
 transfer the data without taking apart an older computer and physically
 mounting each drive.
USB to ATA adapters go for less then 100 NIS at both KSP and ivory,
other real computer stores probably also carry them, BUG may not...

 - 2 drives (maybe more?)
If I had only 2 drives I would mirror them... but you can get more
drives and have less overhead for the same data security through RAIDZ
or RAID5/6

 - accessible by both wired and wireless connections, if possible
No reason it shouldn't be possible on something you build yourself,
most consumer product NAS products feature only wired interfaces but
17 of the 752 products listed by tweakers.net do claim to have such an
interface.

 - I assume I would have to connect to the device directly to set up the IP,
 and from then on manage it remotely. If I can set the IP address without
 connecting (I remember headless servers that let you set the IP with a
 toggle on the device) life would be so much easier.
Some products have a little embedded screen and some buttons that
would allow for a headless setup.


 - cheaper than dirt, or at least double digits, not triple (in dollars)
Only the simplest of simple NAS products (that generally only have 1-2
harddrive bays) have 2-digit dollar prices.


 Questions:

 1. What do I do if my wireless router has two IP networks, one for the wired
 computers and the other for the wireless (a real situation and also a real
 pain in the ass - wired computers and laptops could not reach one another)?
Get a decent wireless router, reconfigure your current router, or if
you made the choice continuously (though you question makes it sound
like you didn't) then either the NAS will have both wireless and wired
connectivity and be a potential bridge between the 2 networks that
should have been isolated from one and other, or you enable routing
between the 2 networks on the router which would essentially defeat
the purpose of separating the 2 networks in the first place unless you
do so with careful policies.

 2. Is there a simple way - or any way - to connect to the drive from several
 networks (because the cell phones have a different IP address, and also the
 wired and wireless devices might have separate IP addresses)?
Cellphones would have the same set of IPs unless you are using you
cellular providers' Internet and not your wireless in which case you
need to ask yourself Am I comfortable exposing all my data protected
by a measly password at best to the big bad Internet (tm)?

On a self built solution you may very well be able to raise security
and use keys etc. but still the question will always be Am I
comfortable with the level of security I created.

Regards,
Eliyahu - אליהו

 Thanks,

 Z.

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il