Re: superscript of sums and integrals in multiline equation
Herbert wrote: In multiline format (eqnarray) the left and the right part are real formulas, but the middle part is a textformula! This is really interesting. Thanks for clearing up this mystery. So it's not possible to write a sum super/subscript under /above the sum-symbol. If you choose the array-format, all parts are in textmode. You can type the sum in all three parts of a multiline formula and you will see, that the middle sum is typed with super/subscript shifted to the right, the left and right one the one with super/subscript above/under the sum. The option \limits works only for integrals, in both math modes! In this point I disagree with you. Type the following in the middle part of a multiline formula and you will get a sum with super/subscripted limits: \sum \limits _n=1 ^\infty n Therefore it's not correct, when LyX views these symbols different to the latex-convention. I agree. Regards, Ingo
Re: superscript of sums and integrals in multiline equation
Herbert wrote: In multiline format (eqnarray) the left and the right part are real formulas, but the middle part is a textformula! This is really interesting. Thanks for clearing up this mystery. So it's not possible to write a sum super/subscript under /above the sum-symbol. If you choose the array-format, all parts are in textmode. You can type the sum in all three parts of a multiline formula and you will see, that the middle sum is typed with super/subscript shifted to the right, the left and right one the one with super/subscript above/under the sum. The option \limits works only for integrals, in both math modes! In this point I disagree with you. Type the following in the middle part of a multiline formula and you will get a sum with super/subscripted limits: \sum \limits _n=1 ^\infty n Therefore it's not correct, when LyX views these symbols different to the latex-convention. I agree. Regards, Ingo
Re: superscript of sums and integrals in multiline equation
Herbert wrote: >In multiline format (eqnarray) the left and the right part are real >formulas, >but the middle part is a textformula! This is really interesting. Thanks for clearing up this mystery. > So it's not possible to write >a sum super/subscript under /above the sum-symbol. If you choose the >array-format, all parts are in textmode. >You can type the sum in all three parts of a multiline formula and you >will >see, that the middle sum is typed with super/subscript shifted to the >right, >the left and right one the one with super/subscript above/under the sum. >The option \limits works only for integrals, in both math modes! In this point I disagree with you. Type the following in the middle part of a multiline formula and you will get a sum with super/subscripted limits: \sum \limits _n=1 ^\infty n >Therefore it's not correct, when LyX views these symbols different to >the latex-convention. I agree. Regards, Ingo
Re: superscript of sums and integrals in multiline equation
Herbert wrote:
Alexander Wollmann wrote:
I have a problem with the subscript of sums and integrals:
In a single math line (M-m d) the subscript is correctly placed UNDER the sum.
Toggle with M-m l changes from "under" to "shifted to the right".
In a multiline equation this does only work for integrals. Superscript with
sums are always shifted to the right (in postscript), even it seems to be OK in
LyX. I need them to be UNDER!! What can I do?
there is no problem for me (Lyx 1.0.4pre6 and Suse 6.2) to write a sum
with super- and/or subscript above and/or under the sum or integral,
both in
a single line equation and in multilines.
I have just installed Lyx 1.0.4pre6 on Suse 6.1 and it still doesn't work for
me. Please have a look at the attached example. In Lyx you should see two sums
and two integrals in one multiline equation. The first sum resp. integral has
sub-/superscripted limits while the second one has its limits
postscripted. Now have a look at the DVI-File. Here both sums have postscripted
limits while there is no problem with the integrals.
The LaTeX-Export looks like this:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
But correct would be:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum\limits ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
Regards,
Ingo
Re: superscript of sums and integrals in multiline equation
The LaTeX-Export looks like this:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
But correct would be:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum\limits ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
here are parts of my lyx-files:
the one of your attached lyx-file superscript...
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
it's just the same as you described above and
it's right, that the second sum has no real super/subscript.
But when I delete the sum-symbol and write it again, it always
works well.
My lyx-file is (only the interesting part):
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
I have no idea what's wrong with your LyX-Version.
Herbert
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss
Re: superscript of sums and integrals in multiline equation
Herbert wrote:
Alexander Wollmann wrote:
I have a problem with the subscript of sums and integrals:
In a single math line (M-m d) the subscript is correctly placed UNDER the sum.
Toggle with M-m l changes from "under" to "shifted to the right".
In a multiline equation this does only work for integrals. Superscript with
sums are always shifted to the right (in postscript), even it seems to be OK in
LyX. I need them to be UNDER!! What can I do?
there is no problem for me (Lyx 1.0.4pre6 and Suse 6.2) to write a sum
with super- and/or subscript above and/or under the sum or integral,
both in
a single line equation and in multilines.
I have just installed Lyx 1.0.4pre6 on Suse 6.1 and it still doesn't work for
me. Please have a look at the attached example. In Lyx you should see two sums
and two integrals in one multiline equation. The first sum resp. integral has
sub-/superscripted limits while the second one has its limits
postscripted. Now have a look at the DVI-File. Here both sums have postscripted
limits while there is no problem with the integrals.
The LaTeX-Export looks like this:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
But correct would be:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum\limits ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
Regards,
Ingo
Re: superscript of sums and integrals in multiline equation
The LaTeX-Export looks like this:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
But correct would be:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum\limits ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
here are parts of my lyx-files:
the one of your attached lyx-file superscript...
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
it's just the same as you described above and
it's right, that the second sum has no real super/subscript.
But when I delete the sum-symbol and write it again, it always
works well.
My lyx-file is (only the interesting part):
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
I have no idea what's wrong with your LyX-Version.
Herbert
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss
Re: superscript of sums and integrals in multiline equation
Herbert wrote:
>> Alexander Wollmann wrote:
>> >I have a problem with the subscript of sums and integrals:
>> >
>> >In a single math line (M-m d) the subscript is correctly placed UNDER the sum.
>> >Toggle with M-m l changes from "under" to "shifted to the right".
>> >
>> >In a multiline equation this does only work for integrals. Superscript with
>> >sums are always shifted to the right (in postscript), even it seems to be OK in
>> >LyX. I need them to be UNDER!! What can I do?
>
>there is no problem for me (Lyx 1.0.4pre6 and Suse 6.2) to write a sum
>with super- and/or subscript above and/or under the sum or integral,
>both in
>a single line equation and in multilines.
I have just installed Lyx 1.0.4pre6 on Suse 6.1 and it still doesn't work for
me. Please have a look at the attached example. In Lyx you should see two sums
and two integrals in one multiline equation. The first sum resp. integral has
sub-/superscripted limits while the second one has its limits
postscripted. Now have a look at the DVI-File. Here both sums have postscripted
limits while there is no problem with the integrals.
The LaTeX-Export looks like this:
\begin{eqnarray*}
& \sum ^{n}_{i=1}i & \\
& \sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i & \\
& \int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} & \\
& \int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} &
\end{eqnarray*}
But correct would be:
\begin{eqnarray*}
& \sum\limits ^{n}_{i=1}i & \\
& \sum _{i=1}^{n}i & \\
& \int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} & \\
& \int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} &
\end{eqnarray*}
Regards,
Ingo
Re: superscript of sums and integrals in multiline equation
> The LaTeX-Export looks like this:
> \begin{eqnarray*}
> & \sum ^{n}_{i=1}i & \\
> & \sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i & \\
> & \int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} & \\
> & \int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} &
> \end{eqnarray*}
>
> But correct would be:
> \begin{eqnarray*}
> & \sum\limits ^{n}_{i=1}i & \\
> & \sum _{i=1}^{n}i & \\
> & \int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} & \\
> & \int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} &
> \end{eqnarray*}
>
here are parts of my lyx-files:
the one of your attached lyx-file superscript...
\begin{eqnarray*}
& \sum ^{n}_{i=1}i & \\
& \sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i & \\
& \int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} & \\
& \int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} &
\end{eqnarray*}
it's just the same as you described above and
it's right, that the second sum has no real super/subscript.
But when I delete the sum-symbol and write it again, it always
works well.
My lyx-file is (only the interesting part):
\begin{eqnarray*}
& \sum ^{n}_{i=1}i & \\
& \sum ^{n}_{i=1}i & \\
& \int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} & \\
& \int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} &
\end{eqnarray*}
I have no idea what's wrong with your LyX-Version.
Herbert
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss
