Re: RE-35 flexisensor
David, if I could take digital picture with my MX, KX, SuperA beleive me I would. The thing is, this is the last thing manufacturers want us to get. If something like this hits the street, a lot less people will buy DSLRs. As for sensor performance, just get the next version of this RE35 or whatever name it gets. That way, digital would be enjoyable as possible. To be perfect digital'd use film :p 2011/4/4 David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com: Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick. It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an old film camera worth $20 (or even $200)? What do you do with cameras that don't have removable backs? How to you bypass the camera winder interlock when it is in a different place on different cameras? On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: Hope springs eternal. The technical problems with this must be nuts or someone would have done t by now, Either that or it would cost too much. An old MX with digifilm? My old MZ-S? I wonder what I would have paid to be able to use all those bodies again without film. If phase one can make a digital back for your hasselblad, they can make one for your pentax, and it might only cost half the price. On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs -- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ KX, MX, SuperA+Motor, Z1, P30 Mamiya C330+80/2.8 Sekonic L-208 FalconEyes TE300D x2 Studio flashes Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
From: Rob Studdert On 10 April 2011 22:23, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: Any protective coverings would have to be thin enough they wouldn't protrude materially beyond the film plane or the whole idea wouldn't work. Which is why a true FF sensor of this type is a virtual impossibility. You're confusing economic infeasibility with impossible. Every day I use stuff that was impossible when I started in photography. If there's really a market for something like this, some genius will eventually figure out how to do it and where to sell it. And I think there *is* a small market, even if it has only a narrow window of opportunity (i.e. the rest of my lifetime). They may not figure out how to produce something like this at a price anyone is willing to pay in time for all of us who still love our old film cameras to buy them, but it's not impossible. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On 11 April 2011 22:01, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: You're confusing economic infeasibility with impossible. Every day I use stuff that was impossible when I started in photography. If there's really a market for something like this, some genius will eventually figure out how to do it and where to sell it. And I think there *is* a small market, even if it has only a narrow window of opportunity (i.e. the rest of my lifetime). They may not figure out how to produce something like this at a price anyone is willing to pay in time for all of us who still love our old film cameras to buy them, but it's not impossible. As Cotty would say, I'd eat my hat -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Rob Studdert wrote: On 11 April 2011 22:01, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: You're confusing economic infeasibility with impossible. Every day I use stuff that was impossible when I started in photography. If there's really a market for something like this, some genius will eventually figure out how to do it and where to sell it. And I think there *is* a small market, even if it has only a narrow window of opportunity (i.e. the rest of my lifetime). They may not figure out how to produce something like this at a price anyone is willing to pay in time for all of us who still love our old film cameras to buy them, but it's not impossible. As Cotty would say, I'd eat my hat I think such a device could be produced now, since there have been so many advances in thin-film technology as it applies to other fields. But there is nothing to warrant the investment in a device for film cameras. It's a dying market. No one in their right mind would put their money into that kind of enterprise.. Paul -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
From: Rob Studdert On 5 April 2011 18:46, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote: Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen on one of my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF sensor, and cram the electronics into the fairly large battery and clock box. Expand the Dial Data Back's compartment to cover the whole back if need be, Use the power from the motor drive's battery pack. Piece of cake! Not quite as easy as it might appear, the major issue lies with the actual plane of focus on a sensor assembly vs the materials that must be placed in front of the light sensitive surface. IOW the sensor assembly would need to slightly protrude into the mirror box, not a great situation when combined with a focal plane shutter ;-) Any protective coverings would have to be thin enough they wouldn't protrude materially beyond the film plane or the whole idea wouldn't work. - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3562 - Release Date: 04/09/11 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On 10 April 2011 22:23, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: Any protective coverings would have to be thin enough they wouldn't protrude materially beyond the film plane or the whole idea wouldn't work. Which is why a true FF sensor of this type is a virtual impossibility. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On 5 April 2011 18:46, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote: Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen on one of my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF sensor, and cram the electronics into the fairly large battery and clock box. Expand the Dial Data Back's compartment to cover the whole back if need be, Use the power from the motor drive's battery pack. Piece of cake! Not quite as easy as it might appear, the major issue lies with the actual plane of focus on a sensor assembly vs the materials that must be placed in front of the light sensitive surface. IOW the sensor assembly would need to slightly protrude into the mirror box, not a great situation when combined with a focal plane shutter ;-) -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On Apr 9, 2011, at 15:46 , Rob Studdert wrote: On 5 April 2011 18:46, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote: Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen on one of my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF sensor, and cram the electronics into the fairly large battery and clock box. Expand the Dial Data Back's compartment to cover the whole back if need be, Use the power from the motor drive's battery pack. Piece of cake! Not quite as easy as it might appear, the major issue lies with the actual plane of focus on a sensor assembly vs the materials that must be placed in front of the light sensitive surface. IOW the sensor assembly would need to slightly protrude into the mirror box, not a great situation when combined with a focal plane shutter ;-) I see several millimeters between the film plane and the leading edge of the rear curtain. Surely that is something to work with? If not, a corrector lens could be placed at the LX film plane to alter the plane of focus by the amount needed to fit a sensor to the back. The shake reduction mechanism could then occupy the dial data back compartment. Other circuitry would sit off to the left and in the film cartridge area. A little snip snip could prepare the take-up compartment into another hole in which electronics could be packed. This description and the methodology I release into the public domain. I don't have the time to make it happen!:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) But I call dibs on one of the first production units, please... Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com THE SENILITY PRAYER : Grant me the senility to forget the people I never liked anyway, The good fortune to run into the ones I do, and The eyesight to tell the difference. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On Apr 4, 2011, at 13:34 , John Sessoms wrote: From: David Parsons Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick. It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an old film camera worth $20 (or even $200)? What do you do with cameras that don't have removable backs? How to you bypass the camera winder interlock when it is in a different place on different cameras? If they could actually make this flexisensor thingy work and bring the price down to where it didn't cost much more than a high end memory card, I'd buy one for my LX. Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen on one of my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF sensor, and cram the electronics into the fairly large battery and clock box. Expand the Dial Data Back's compartment to cover the whole back if need be, Use the power from the motor drive's battery pack. Piece of cake! If it doesn’t excite you, This thing that you see, Why in the world, Would it excite me? —Jay Maisel Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
From: Bruce Walker On 11-04-03 7:09 PM, Krisjanis Linkevics wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est This idea has been around for many years now (more than 5), seeing as no information is available (at all) and the contact page says will be available later this year without even mentioning what year they are referring to... I wouldn't hold my breath for this one. kris ZDNet says prank: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/digitalcameras/top-5-april-fools-day-photo-pranks/4885 This German design firm went to a hell of a lot of trouble ... http://www.roggeundpott.de/projekte_de/alle-projekte_de/re-35/ I wonder how many good ideas started out as April Fools pranks, but someone else got inspired and said, You know that might work. ... and made a fortune off of it? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
Google siliconfilm. It was a real idea around 2001. If I'm not in error also an actual 1.2 Mp product http://www.dpreview.com/news/9909/99090501siliconfilm.asp -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
One of the classic items that defines vaporware. On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote: Google siliconfilm. It was a real idea around 2001. If I'm not in error also an actual 1.2 Mp product http://www.dpreview.com/news/9909/99090501siliconfilm.asp -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
From: Toine Google siliconfilm. It was a real idea around 2001. If I'm not in error also an actual 1.2 Mp product http://www.dpreview.com/news/9909/99090501siliconfilm.asp Never got beyond the prototype ... and I don't think it was even a *working* prototype. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
Hope springs eternal. The technical problems with this must be nuts or someone would have done t by now, Either that or it would cost too much. An old MX with digifilm? My old MZ-S? I wonder what I would have paid to be able to use all those bodies again without film. On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: Hope springs eternal. The technical problems with this must be nuts or someone would have done t by now, Either that or it would cost too much. An old MX with digifilm? My old MZ-S? I wonder what I would have paid to be able to use all those bodies again without film. If phase one can make a digital back for your hasselblad, they can make one for your pentax, and it might only cost half the price. On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick. It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an old film camera worth $20 (or even $200)? What do you do with cameras that don't have removable backs? How to you bypass the camera winder interlock when it is in a different place on different cameras? On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: Hope springs eternal. The technical problems with this must be nuts or someone would have done t by now, Either that or it would cost too much. An old MX with digifilm? My old MZ-S? I wonder what I would have paid to be able to use all those bodies again without film. If phase one can make a digital back for your hasselblad, they can make one for your pentax, and it might only cost half the price. On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:49 PM, David Parsons wrote: Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick. It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it would economical. That was kind of my point. Don't the phase one backs go for about $20K? So for the price of a 645D, you could turn your film camera into a K-5, without as good of ergonomics. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
Larry Colen wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough to hide the fact that it's a hoax. -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Larry Colen wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough to hide the fact that it's a hoax. It's apparently an advertising firm, and they seem to be getting a lot of buzz from it. Even if they had a misspelling on the first page. IIRC ammount rather than amount. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
Larry Colen wrote: On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Larry Colen wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough to hide the fact that it's a hoax. It's apparently an advertising firm, and they seem to be getting a lot of buzz from it. Even if they had a misspelling on the first page. IIRC ammount rather than amount. And wether rather than whether, it's where they should have its, und for and, your for you're, repeated use of the copyright symbol next to Flexisensor when it should be a Trademark symbol. No mention of memory capacity(!) or power supply. Says patented but has no patent number. They put all their effort into the graphic design, which is pretty nice, but... -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
From: David Parsons Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick. It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an old film camera worth $20 (or even $200)? What do you do with cameras that don't have removable backs? How to you bypass the camera winder interlock when it is in a different place on different cameras? If they could actually make this flexisensor thingy work and bring the price down to where it didn't cost much more than a high end memory card, I'd buy one for my LX. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
If I believed this was real, I'd be out there snapping up Leica M-4P and Nikon F3 bodies, some lovely old lenses, right now. Actually, though, there is a new sensor technology in the labs that could be used for this once it is . A nanno-dot technology manufactured by a process which deposits photosites on a flexible film substrate. There was a write up on it in some technical journal or another a year or so back. Makes me wonder ... How much would I like an F3 again? :-) -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
Photovoltaic cells can be produced on thin amorphous film, so I suppose a sensor made from amorphous material is possible. Paul On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:27 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: If I believed this was real, I'd be out there snapping up Leica M-4P and Nikon F3 bodies, some lovely old lenses, right now. Actually, though, there is a new sensor technology in the labs that could be used for this once it is . A nanno-dot technology manufactured by a process which deposits photosites on a flexible film substrate. There was a write up on it in some technical journal or another a year or so back. Makes me wonder ... How much would I like an F3 again? :-) -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: RE-35 flexisensor
If I believed this was real, I'd be out there snapping up Leica M-4P and Nikon F3 bodies, some lovely old lenses, right now. Actually, though, there is a new sensor technology in the labs that could be used for this once it is . A nanno-dot technology manufactured by a process which deposits photosites on a flexible film substrate. There was a write up on it in some technical journal or another a year or so back. Makes me wonder ... How much would I like an F3 again? :-) -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com I think you're getting it mixed up with Nanny Dot technology, which is when your granny knits you a picture. B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
Looks like it went much farther than anyone really intended: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/general-photography/139096-digital-film-gets-new-lease-life.html#post1453566 On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Larry Colen wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough to hide the fact that it's a hoax. -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: RE-35 flexisensor
This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est This idea has been around for many years now (more than 5), seeing as no information is available (at all) and the contact page says will be available later this year without even mentioning what year they are referring to... I wouldn't hold my breath for this one. kris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 16:00 -0700, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ I'm pretty sure that this was another April 1 fun site. (not that I wouldn't be interested if it was really..er, real). Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ Not really. If you check the name and http on that page, you will end up at a German design firm -- and that's not sensor design -- where they tell you of their efforts and how ... pünktlich zum 1. April wird die entsprechende Pressemitteilung ... sent out. The date says it all, doesn't it? http://www.roggeundpott.de/input-output_de/ CarlG -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
On 11-04-03 7:09 PM, Krisjanis Linkevics wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est This idea has been around for many years now (more than 5), seeing as no information is available (at all) and the contact page says will be available later this year without even mentioning what year they are referring to... I wouldn't hold my breath for this one. kris ZDNet says prank: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/digitalcameras/top-5-april-fools-day-photo-pranks/4885 This German design firm went to a hell of a lot of trouble ... http://www.roggeundpott.de/projekte_de/alle-projekte_de/re-35/ -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: RE-35 flexisensor
Looks like silicon film, I think they came close to shipping something, maybe, 4-6mp with a serious crop factor, but only worked in a limited number of cameras. Still I'd love to have something like that for my LX, though I doubt that anything will ever come of it. On 4/3/2011 7:00 PM, Larry Colen wrote: This is very intriguing http://re35.net/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom! --Marvin the Martian. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
