[qmailtoaster] dependencies issues... Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
On Aug 11, 2007, at 5:05 AM, PakOgah wrote: hope this weekend your tests running smoothly. please tell us the results can't wait till Monday Just for general information - I downloaded and compiled the updated clamav and spamassassing from Erik's developmnet site. Then, install them with rpm -Uvh clamav spamassassin. clamav installed just fine. when installing spamassassin, I received dependencies warnings. rpm -Uvh spamassassin-toaster-3.2.3-1.3.12.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl(Archive::Tar) = 1.23 is needed by spamassassin- toaster-3.2.3-1.3.12.x86_64 perl(HTML::Parser) = 3.43 is needed by spamassassin- toaster-3.2.3-1.3.12.x86_64 perl(IO::Zlib) = 1.04 is needed by spamassassin- toaster-3.2.3-1.3.12.x86_64 I checked, though, and all of various perl modules ARE in fact at the latest version, and certainly higher than the required 1.23 / 3.43 / 1.04. I suspect, once again, that the problem may have to do with me running this on x86_64 architecture, and that the dev builds the Erik placed online may not take that into consideration. Easy enough to fix, though, I reckon... So, just FYI, see above ;-) --- Antoine De Saint-Exupery True happiness comes from the joy of deeds well done, the zest of creating things new.
Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
Philip Nix Guru wrote: Hello I have very busy smtp servers using clamav 0.91.1 When I combined it with spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 all is working fine glad to hear that, because I was planning to upgrade clamav into ver 0.91.1 I am still using ver 0.90.1 and can't update virus definition. all clamav mirrors server is rejecting connection from old engine By default *Qmail* doesn't do rDNS lookups (performance reasons), so you need to change tcpserver to do them - which then makes SA happy again. i.e. you want tcpserver -h instead of tcpserver -H I have a lot of extra rules and for the performance I reverted back to spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 on a few of my smtps Will do more tests over the weekend hope this weekend your tests running smoothly. please tell us the results can't wait till Monday - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
After running the new spamassassin on the dev site the bugs in the previous versions seem fixed No extra delay in scanning, no rdns issues tagging all emails So far so good I tested on fc5, centos 4.5 and cents 5, both 32 64bts OS using the stable latest packages + clamav 0.91.1 for the info Cheers Philip Nix Guru wrote: Hello I have very busy smtp servers using clamav 0.91.1 When I combined it with spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 all is working fine glad to hear that, because I was planning to upgrade clamav into ver 0.91.1 I am still using ver 0.90.1 and can't update virus definition. all clamav mirrors server is rejecting connection from old engine By default *Qmail* doesn't do rDNS lookups (performance reasons), so you need to change tcpserver to do them - which then makes SA happy again. i.e. you want tcpserver -h instead of tcpserver -H I have a lot of extra rules and for the performance I reverted back to spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 on a few of my smtps Will do more tests over the weekend hope this weekend your tests running smoothly. please tell us the results can't wait till Monday I am runing spamassassin-toaster-3.2.3 with the -H option instead of the -H in the tcpserver run file for smtp I never had any load ebem with 3.2.2, just scanning time was to long With 3.2.3 looks better .. will check later tonight the hits on the diff spam rules and scan time ... ad let you know - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
I use google for some search. I suppose you talk this about: http://www.nabble.com/-Bug-5586---New%3A-RDNS_NONE-has-false-positives-if-the-MTA-doesn't-put-the-hostname-in-the-Received-header-tf4221785.html Is perfomance decreasing badly if we enable rdns lookups in tcpserver (tcpserver -h)? 09.08.07, 00:09, Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello I have very busy smtp servers using clamav 0.91.1 When I combined it with spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 all is working fine When I did combine it with spamassassin-toaster-3.2.2-1.3.11 the scanning time increased badly and all mails got tagged with RDNS_NONE The reason is : There was a change in SA around 3.2.1 whereby it no longer relies on its own code to do PTR lookups (rDNS) of the MTAs showing in the Received: headers. Instead it relies on the local MTA to have done it and written it into the header field. By default *Qmail* doesn't do rDNS lookups (performance reasons), so you need to change tcpserver to do them - which then makes SA happy again. i.e. you want tcpserver -h instead of tcpserver -H I have a lot of extra rules and for the performance I reverted back to spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 on a few of my smtps Will do more tests over the weekend Adam Cantwell wrote: L. A. wrote: Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on devel site under heavy load? I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam download. So i want build new qt with latest versions of clamav and spamd but i'am not shure, because they stay long time on devel site. So is there somebody who have any problems on hi load servers with them? First of all, 10,000 - 30,000 messages per day is not even close to what I consider heavy load. I manage a couple of qmailtoaster servers, one of which handles 200,000 messages per day and the other one more than twice that. Even these I do not consider high load. I am currently running SA 3.2.1 and ClamAV 0.90.3 and have not had any issues at all with said load. I will be upgrading both of these machines tonight to the latest SA and clamav packages on the devel site. I had been waiting for the new SA to show up there to do an upgrade. Whenever I build a new QMT box, I always include whatever latest packages are on the devel site, and for the past two years that I have been using QMT I have not had any issues. Adam - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
Changing to -h is probably a good idea. Before SpamAssassin would do the reverse lookup if the MTA didn't. Now that SpamAssassin relies on the MTA, it's no biggy. E On 8/10/07, L. A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use google for some search. I suppose you talk this about: http://www.nabble.com/-Bug-5586---New%3A-RDNS_NONE-has-false-positives-if-the-MTA-doesn't-put-the-hostname-in-the-Received-header-tf4221785.html Is perfomance decreasing badly if we enable rdns lookups in tcpserver (tcpserver -h)? 09.08.07, 00:09, Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello I have very busy smtp servers using clamav 0.91.1 When I combined it with spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 all is working fine When I did combine it with spamassassin-toaster-3.2.2-1.3.11 the scanning time increased badly and all mails got tagged with RDNS_NONE The reason is : There was a change in SA around 3.2.1 whereby it no longer relies on its own code to do PTR lookups (rDNS) of the MTAs showing in the Received: headers. Instead it relies on the local MTA to have done it and written it into the header field. By default *Qmail* doesn't do rDNS lookups (performance reasons), so you need to change tcpserver to do them - which then makes SA happy again. i.e. you want tcpserver -h instead of tcpserver -H I have a lot of extra rules and for the performance I reverted back to spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 on a few of my smtps Will do more tests over the weekend Adam Cantwell wrote: L. A. wrote: Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on devel site under heavy load? I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam download. So i want build new qt with latest versions of clamav and spamd but i'am not shure, because they stay long time on devel site. So is there somebody who have any problems on hi load servers with them? First of all, 10,000 - 30,000 messages per day is not even close to what I consider heavy load. I manage a couple of qmailtoaster servers, one of which handles 200,000 messages per day and the other one more than twice that. Even these I do not consider high load. I am currently running SA 3.2.1 and ClamAV 0.90.3 and have not had any issues at all with said load. I will be upgrading both of these machines tonight to the latest SA and clamav packages on the devel site. I had been waiting for the new SA to show up there to do an upgrade. Whenever I build a new QMT box, I always include whatever latest packages are on the devel site, and for the past two years that I have been using QMT I have not had any issues. Adam - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on devel site under heavy load? I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam download. So i want build new qt with latest versions of clamav and spamd but i'am not shure, because they stay long time on devel site. So is there somebody who have any problems on hi load servers with them? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
I have no issues. I process approx 30K messages a day on some of my boxes. The new spamassassin requires many more perl modules to be complete. Best bet is to either use rpmforge repo and install the perl modules via rpm OR to cpan install them. Without the packages, the load is higher with the new spamassassin. Thanks, Erik On 8/8/07, L. A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on devel site under heavy load? I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam download. So i want build new qt with latest versions of clamav and spamd but i'am not shure, because they stay long time on devel site. So is there somebody who have any problems on hi load servers with them? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
ok, looks like better choose spamd 3.1 branch for me. If i think correctly on this new machine amount of messages can be hier upto two times (~60-70K) (much more virtual domains). Are you using clamav 0.91.1 without any changes in configs that comes with src.rpm (disable ole\pdf scan or enabling experimental code)? And is there any plans for moving it on main site (and squirrel webmail too :) )? 08.08.07, 22:41, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have no issues. I process approx 30K messages a day on some of my boxes. The new spamassassin requires many more perl modules to be complete. Best bet is to either use rpmforge repo and install the perl modules via rpm OR to cpan install them. Without the packages, the load is higher with the new spamassassin. Thanks, Erik On 8/8/07, L. A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on devel site under heavy load? I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam download. So i want build new qt with latest versions of clamav and spamd but i'am not shure, because they stay long time on devel site. So is there somebody who have any problems on hi load servers with them? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
Greetings, Are you using clamav 0.91.1 without any changes in configs that comes with src.rpm (disable ole\pdf scan or enabling experimental code)? I am running ClamAV exactly as it is on the dev site. And is there any plans for moving it on main site (and squirrel webmail too :) )? I am not planning to move things to the main site for now. I am working on too many things at once with regards to this project: 1) Keep current branch up to date 2) Answer questions on this list 3) Finish QT 1.4 (binary yum updates available for non-djb packages, etc) 4) Merge Devel and Main site together For now, I am just going to put the packages on the devel site. Thanks, Erik - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?
L. A. wrote: Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on devel site under heavy load? I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam download. So i want build new qt with latest versions of clamav and spamd but i'am not shure, because they stay long time on devel site. So is there somebody who have any problems on hi load servers with them? First of all, 10,000 - 30,000 messages per day is not even close to what I consider heavy load. I manage a couple of qmailtoaster servers, one of which handles 200,000 messages per day and the other one more than twice that. Even these I do not consider high load. I am currently running SA 3.2.1 and ClamAV 0.90.3 and have not had any issues at all with said load. I will be upgrading both of these machines tonight to the latest SA and clamav packages on the devel site. I had been waiting for the new SA to show up there to do an upgrade. Whenever I build a new QMT box, I always include whatever latest packages are on the devel site, and for the past two years that I have been using QMT I have not had any issues. Adam - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
