Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
Here is the updated patch: http://jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer6.jar Sedat Çiftçi --- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/23/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you prefer that design, I can change it and re-submit the patch. Sedat Çiftçi Yes, please. I think the consensus is that we'd rather avoid new table creation in this enhancement. - Dave --- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/21/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it can also be done with this design. Note that, in this design you have to clear the activationCode (or make something else, to mark that it is used) after the account is activated (Also in my design, I delete the related record from useractivate table). The reason behind this requirement can be explained as follows: Let's assume that a user registers with e-mail activation and assume that the related activationCode is not deleted. After a while, admin user wants to disable the account of this user from the User Admin menu of the Server Administration and disables it. Then, if the user clicks the activation link in the sent activation mail (assume user stores it; did not delete it), his/her account is enabled again. Because of this simple scenario, do not forget to mark the activated accounts so that the link in the sent activation mail will not be used again once it is used. Sedat, Are you willing to change the design to remove the new table and then re-submit the patch? - Dave Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
If you prefer that design, I can change it and re-submit the patch. Sedat Çiftçi --- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/21/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it can also be done with this design. Note that, in this design you have to clear the activationCode (or make something else, to mark that it is used) after the account is activated (Also in my design, I delete the related record from useractivate table). The reason behind this requirement can be explained as follows: Let's assume that a user registers with e-mail activation and assume that the related activationCode is not deleted. After a while, admin user wants to disable the account of this user from the User Admin menu of the Server Administration and disables it. Then, if the user clicks the activation link in the sent activation mail (assume user stores it; did not delete it), his/her account is enabled again. Because of this simple scenario, do not forget to mark the activated accounts so that the link in the sent activation mail will not be used again once it is used. Sedat, Are you willing to change the design to remove the new table and then re-submit the patch? - Dave Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
On 3/23/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you prefer that design, I can change it and re-submit the patch. Sedat Çiftçi Yes, please. I think the consensus is that we'd rather avoid new table creation in this enhancement. - Dave --- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/21/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it can also be done with this design. Note that, in this design you have to clear the activationCode (or make something else, to mark that it is used) after the account is activated (Also in my design, I delete the related record from useractivate table). The reason behind this requirement can be explained as follows: Let's assume that a user registers with e-mail activation and assume that the related activationCode is not deleted. After a while, admin user wants to disable the account of this user from the User Admin menu of the Server Administration and disables it. Then, if the user clicks the activation link in the sent activation mail (assume user stores it; did not delete it), his/her account is enabled again. Because of this simple scenario, do not forget to mark the activated accounts so that the link in the sent activation mail will not be used again once it is used. Sedat, Are you willing to change the design to remove the new table and then re-submit the patch? - Dave Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
On 3/21/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it can also be done with this design. Note that, in this design you have to clear the activationCode (or make something else, to mark that it is used) after the account is activated (Also in my design, I delete the related record from useractivate table). The reason behind this requirement can be explained as follows: Let's assume that a user registers with e-mail activation and assume that the related activationCode is not deleted. After a while, admin user wants to disable the account of this user from the User Admin menu of the Server Administration and disables it. Then, if the user clicks the activation link in the sent activation mail (assume user stores it; did not delete it), his/her account is enabled again. Because of this simple scenario, do not forget to mark the activated accounts so that the link in the sent activation mail will not be used again once it is used. Sedat, Are you willing to change the design to remove the new table and then re-submit the patch? - Dave
PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
I have taken a look at Sedat's patch and the design and actual code look good. I tested against Roller trunk and everything worked fine -- there are a couple of small fixes in error handling and email word/formatting that I will make before committing, but overall it is ready to go. I wrote-up a proposal based on his work here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Proposal+Email+Registration Please review and comment on this proposal. - Dave
Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
I don't understand what exactly this is trying to accomplish. How do you actually register an account via email? You need to supply input for the various form fields at some point right? Can we get a description of the work flow that this is advocating? When does the email get sent? What does it contain? What action does the recipient take? etc. Can we get Sedat access to the wiki so that he can add this info since this is really his proposal? -- Allen Dave wrote: I have taken a look at Sedat's patch and the design and actual code look good. I tested against Roller trunk and everything worked fine -- there are a couple of small fixes in error handling and email word/formatting that I will make before committing, but overall it is ready to go. I wrote-up a proposal based on his work here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Proposal+Email+Registration Please review and comment on this proposal. - Dave
Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
On 3/21/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand what exactly this is trying to accomplish. How do you actually register an account via email? You need to supply input for the various form fields at some point right? Can we get a description of the work flow that this is advocating? When does the email get sent? What does it contain? What action does the recipient take? etc. The work flow is this: 1) User enters registration info into existing registration form and posts 2) Roller responds: thanks for registering, please wait for activation email 3) User gets email, clicks activation link 4) Roller responds: You are registered! Here's a link for you to login Can we get Sedat access to the wiki so that he can add this info since this is really his proposal? That's my question as well. Can we give non-committers access to the wiki? Anybody (hi Henri) know? - Dave Dave wrote: I have taken a look at Sedat's patch and the design and actual code look good. I tested against Roller trunk and everything worked fine -- there are a couple of small fixes in error handling and email word/formatting that I will make before committing, but overall it is ready to go. I wrote-up a proposal based on his work here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Proposal+Email+Registration Please review and comment on this proposal. - Dave
Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
Dave wrote:
On 3/21/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what exactly this is trying to accomplish. How do
you actually register an account via email? You need to supply input
for the various form fields at some point right?
Can we get a description of the work flow that this is advocating? When
does the email get sent? What does it contain? What action does the
recipient take? etc.
The work flow is this:
1) User enters registration info into existing registration form and posts
2) Roller responds: thanks for registering, please wait for activation
email
3) User gets email, clicks activation link
4) Roller responds: You are registered! Here's a link for you to login
gotcha, i don't know why i was thinking of something else.
in any case, i think the design could be simplified a bit. rather than
create a whole new table why not just add the activationcode column to
the existing rolleruser table? that way we don't need the new table,
pojo, and manager methods. in fact, the registration code is basically
unchanged except for adding in this logic ...
if(emailActivationEnabled) {
newUser.setEnabled(false);
// generate activation code
newUser.setActivationCode(code);
// send activation email
}
-- Allen
Can we get Sedat access to the wiki so that he can add this info since
this is really his proposal?
That's my question as well. Can we give non-committers access to the wiki?
Anybody (hi Henri) know?
- Dave
Dave wrote:
I have taken a look at Sedat's patch and the design and actual code
look good. I tested against Roller trunk and everything worked fine --
there are a couple of small fixes in error handling and email
word/formatting that I will make before committing, but overall it is
ready to go.
I wrote-up a proposal based on his work here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Proposal+Email+Registration
Please review and comment on this proposal.
- Dave
Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
On 3/21/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave wrote:
On 3/21/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what exactly this is trying to accomplish. How do
you actually register an account via email? You need to supply input
for the various form fields at some point right?
Can we get a description of the work flow that this is advocating? When
does the email get sent? What does it contain? What action does the
recipient take? etc.
The work flow is this:
1) User enters registration info into existing registration form and posts
2) Roller responds: thanks for registering, please wait for activation
email
3) User gets email, clicks activation link
4) Roller responds: You are registered! Here's a link for you to login
gotcha, i don't know why i was thinking of something else.
in any case, i think the design could be simplified a bit. rather than
create a whole new table why not just add the activationcode column to
the existing rolleruser table? that way we don't need the new table,
pojo, and manager methods. in fact, the registration code is basically
unchanged except for adding in this logic ...
if(emailActivationEnabled) {
newUser.setEnabled(false);
// generate activation code
newUser.setActivationCode(code);
// send activation email
}
Yes. I prefer that too.
- Dave
Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
I'm fine with this proposal.
Matt
On 3/21/07, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/21/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave wrote:
On 3/21/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what exactly this is trying to accomplish. How do
you actually register an account via email? You need to supply input
for the various form fields at some point right?
Can we get a description of the work flow that this is advocating? When
does the email get sent? What does it contain? What action does the
recipient take? etc.
The work flow is this:
1) User enters registration info into existing registration form and posts
2) Roller responds: thanks for registering, please wait for activation
email
3) User gets email, clicks activation link
4) Roller responds: You are registered! Here's a link for you to login
gotcha, i don't know why i was thinking of something else.
in any case, i think the design could be simplified a bit. rather than
create a whole new table why not just add the activationcode column to
the existing rolleruser table? that way we don't need the new table,
pojo, and manager methods. in fact, the registration code is basically
unchanged except for adding in this logic ...
if(emailActivationEnabled) {
newUser.setEnabled(false);
// generate activation code
newUser.setActivationCode(code);
// send activation email
}
Yes. I prefer that too.
- Dave
--
http://raibledesigns.com
Re: PROPOSAL: register user with e-mail activation
--- Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave wrote:
On 3/21/07, Allen Gilliland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what exactly this is trying to
accomplish. How do
you actually register an account via email? You
need to supply input
for the various form fields at some point right?
Can we get a description of the work flow that
this is advocating? When
does the email get sent? What does it contain?
What action does the
recipient take? etc.
The work flow is this:
1) User enters registration info into existing
registration form and posts
2) Roller responds: thanks for registering, please
wait for activation
email
3) User gets email, clicks activation link
4) Roller responds: You are registered! Here's a
link for you to login
gotcha, i don't know why i was thinking of something
else.
in any case, i think the design could be simplified
a bit. rather than
create a whole new table why not just add the
activationcode column to
the existing rolleruser table? that way we don't
need the new table,
pojo, and manager methods. in fact, the
registration code is basically
unchanged except for adding in this logic ...
if(emailActivationEnabled) {
newUser.setEnabled(false);
// generate activation code
newUser.setActivationCode(code);
// send activation email
}
-- Allen
Yes, it can also be done with this design. Note that,
in this design you have to clear the activationCode
(or make something else, to mark that it is used)
after the account is activated (Also in my design, I
delete the related record from useractivate table).
The reason behind this requirement can be explained as
follows:
Let's assume that a user registers with e-mail
activation and assume that the related activationCode
is not deleted. After a while, admin user wants to
disable the account of this user from the User Admin
menu of the Server Administration and disables it.
Then, if the user clicks the activation link in the
sent activation mail (assume user stores it; did not
delete it), his/her account is enabled again. Because
of this simple scenario, do not forget to mark the
activated accounts so that the link in the sent
activation mail will not be used again once it is
used.
Sedat Çiftçi
Can we get Sedat access to the wiki so that he
can add this info since
this is really his proposal?
That's my question as well. Can we give
non-committers access to the wiki?
Anybody (hi Henri) know?
- Dave
Dave wrote:
I have taken a look at Sedat's patch and the
design and actual code
look good. I tested against Roller trunk and
everything worked fine --
there are a couple of small fixes in error
handling and email
word/formatting that I will make before
committing, but overall it is
ready to go.
I wrote-up a proposal based on his work here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Proposal+Email+Registration
Please review and comment on this proposal.
- Dave
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
Re: Proposal: register user with e-mail activation
I'm looking at the patch now and I should have some feedback soon. I wrote up a proposal for you here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Proposal+Email+Registration - Dave On 3/19/07, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Sedat. I'll hope to get to this today. - Dave On 3/18/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello again, I add a small but necessary code into the activateUser method of UserNewAction.java for handling the user account activation manually by site admin (site administrator can manually activate the user account by simply enabling the user from the 'User Admin' menu). zip file that contains diff patch for current trunk: http://jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer5.jar Note: I apologize for too many versions but I hope this is the last version. Sedat Çiftçi --- sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Here is the zip file that contains the patch to work with the current trunk: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer4.jar Note that this patch file also contains new added class (org.apache.roller.pojos.UserActivationData) Note about sandbox: I do not know anything about sandbox. I do not make any changes on the files related under the directory sandbox. Sedat Çiftçi --- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/17/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you are right. I forget to include it. Here is the updated zip file: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer3.jar Sedat, I took a look at the patch this morning. Unfortunately, it targets the 3.0 code-base and enough has changed that most of the changes cannot be applied to trunk. Unfortunately, I don't have time right now to port your patch from 3.0 to trunk. But, if you are willing to update the patch to work with the current trunk, then I'm willing to evaluate it and write-up a short proposal so we can get it committed. - Dave No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
Re: Proposal: register user with e-mail activation
Thanks Sedat. I'll hope to get to this today. - Dave On 3/18/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello again, I add a small but necessary code into the activateUser method of UserNewAction.java for handling the user account activation manually by site admin (site administrator can manually activate the user account by simply enabling the user from the 'User Admin' menu). zip file that contains diff patch for current trunk: http://jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer5.jar Note: I apologize for too many versions but I hope this is the last version. Sedat Çiftçi --- sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Here is the zip file that contains the patch to work with the current trunk: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer4.jar Note that this patch file also contains new added class (org.apache.roller.pojos.UserActivationData) Note about sandbox: I do not know anything about sandbox. I do not make any changes on the files related under the directory sandbox. Sedat Çiftçi --- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/17/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you are right. I forget to include it. Here is the updated zip file: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer3.jar Sedat, I took a look at the patch this morning. Unfortunately, it targets the 3.0 code-base and enough has changed that most of the changes cannot be applied to trunk. Unfortunately, I don't have time right now to port your patch from 3.0 to trunk. But, if you are willing to update the patch to work with the current trunk, then I'm willing to evaluate it and write-up a short proposal so we can get it committed. - Dave No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
Re: Proposal: register user with e-mail activation
Hello again, I add a small but necessary code into the activateUser method of UserNewAction.java for handling the user account activation manually by site admin (site administrator can manually activate the user account by simply enabling the user from the 'User Admin' menu). zip file that contains diff patch for current trunk: http://jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer5.jar Note: I apologize for too many versions but I hope this is the last version. Sedat Çiftçi --- sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Here is the zip file that contains the patch to work with the current trunk: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer4.jar Note that this patch file also contains new added class (org.apache.roller.pojos.UserActivationData) Note about sandbox: I do not know anything about sandbox. I do not make any changes on the files related under the directory sandbox. Sedat Çiftçi --- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/17/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you are right. I forget to include it. Here is the updated zip file: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer3.jar Sedat, I took a look at the patch this morning. Unfortunately, it targets the 3.0 code-base and enough has changed that most of the changes cannot be applied to trunk. Unfortunately, I don't have time right now to port your patch from 3.0 to trunk. But, if you are willing to update the patch to work with the current trunk, then I'm willing to evaluate it and write-up a short proposal so we can get it committed. - Dave No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
Re: Proposal: register user with e-mail activation
Yes, you are right. I forget to include it. Here is the updated zip file: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer3.jar I also update the method for generating activation code . Sedat --- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sedat, I don't see any DIFF patch file in the jar you sent. Perhaps you forgot to include it? - Dave On 3/12/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I reprepare a single DIFF patch file plus the new added file and put them into the ( http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer2.jar ) (i also put the all of the files that i changed if anyone needs). Please, forget the previous link, and look at this new file. note that the extension of the file is indeed .zip. jroller does not allow to upload files with .zip extensions. Due to this reason, i change the extension of the file to .jar ( by renaming it) in order to upload it to the jroller. So, when you download it, change its extension to .zip . Sedat --- sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I add a new property to roller that is related with the activation of user account via e-mail when the user register to the system. A brief summary of what i do: - i add a property to the roller.properties so that a user can turn on/off the registration of user with e-mail activation (property is user.account.activation.enabled). if user.account.activation.enabled=false, then a user can directly register to the roller, as it is done normally. if user.account.activation.enabled=true, then a user has to activate his/her account by clicking the link in the activation mail (when a user registers to roller, i save the user by setting the enabled property as false so that he/she can not login. Then, I create an activation code, associate it with this user, and send this code to the user via e-mail. When user clicks the link in this e-mail, user account is activated by setting the enabled property of this user to true and then the related activation code record is deleted from the database). I sent this email with the patch for the roller 3.0 as an attachment before, but this mail is not delivered to the roller-dev mail list. So, i put this file on jroller (http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerProperty.jar); note that the extension of the file is indeed .zip. jroller does not allow to upload files with .zip extensions. Due to this reason, i change the extension of the file to .jar ( by renaming it) in order to upload it to the jroller. So, when you download it, change its extension to .zip . If you copy and paste the files to the roller 3.0 src and compile it, it will work. I do not try with roller 3.1 but i hope it will work (in this case, you have to copy the related code segments to the existing files in the roller 3.1 since there may be changes on these files after roller 3.0). I hope you like this feature. Sedat TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
Re: Proposal: register user with e-mail activation
On 3/17/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you are right. I forget to include it. Here is the updated zip file: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer3.jar Sedat, I took a look at the patch this morning. Unfortunately, it targets the 3.0 code-base and enough has changed that most of the changes cannot be applied to trunk. Unfortunately, I don't have time right now to port your patch from 3.0 to trunk. But, if you are willing to update the patch to work with the current trunk, then I'm willing to evaluate it and write-up a short proposal so we can get it committed. - Dave
Re: Proposal: register user with e-mail activation
Hello, Here is the zip file that contains the patch to work with the current trunk: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer4.jar Note that this patch file also contains new added class (org.apache.roller.pojos.UserActivationData) Note about sandbox: I do not know anything about sandbox. I do not make any changes on the files related under the directory sandbox. Sedat Çiftçi --- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/17/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you are right. I forget to include it. Here is the updated zip file: http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer3.jar Sedat, I took a look at the patch this morning. Unfortunately, it targets the 3.0 code-base and enough has changed that most of the changes cannot be applied to trunk. Unfortunately, I don't have time right now to port your patch from 3.0 to trunk. But, if you are willing to update the patch to work with the current trunk, then I'm willing to evaluate it and write-up a short proposal so we can get it committed. - Dave No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail
Re: Proposal: register user with e-mail activation
Sedat, I don't see any DIFF patch file in the jar you sent. Perhaps you forgot to include it? - Dave On 3/12/07, sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I reprepare a single DIFF patch file plus the new added file and put them into the ( http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer2.jar ) (i also put the all of the files that i changed if anyone needs). Please, forget the previous link, and look at this new file. note that the extension of the file is indeed .zip. jroller does not allow to upload files with .zip extensions. Due to this reason, i change the extension of the file to .jar ( by renaming it) in order to upload it to the jroller. So, when you download it, change its extension to .zip . Sedat --- sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I add a new property to roller that is related with the activation of user account via e-mail when the user register to the system. A brief summary of what i do: - i add a property to the roller.properties so that a user can turn on/off the registration of user with e-mail activation (property is user.account.activation.enabled). if user.account.activation.enabled=false, then a user can directly register to the roller, as it is done normally. if user.account.activation.enabled=true, then a user has to activate his/her account by clicking the link in the activation mail (when a user registers to roller, i save the user by setting the enabled property as false so that he/she can not login. Then, I create an activation code, associate it with this user, and send this code to the user via e-mail. When user clicks the link in this e-mail, user account is activated by setting the enabled property of this user to true and then the related activation code record is deleted from the database). I sent this email with the patch for the roller 3.0 as an attachment before, but this mail is not delivered to the roller-dev mail list. So, i put this file on jroller (http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerProperty.jar); note that the extension of the file is indeed .zip. jroller does not allow to upload files with .zip extensions. Due to this reason, i change the extension of the file to .jar ( by renaming it) in order to upload it to the jroller. So, when you download it, change its extension to .zip . If you copy and paste the files to the roller 3.0 src and compile it, it will work. I do not try with roller 3.1 but i hope it will work (in this case, you have to copy the related code segments to the existing files in the roller 3.1 since there may be changes on these files after roller 3.0). I hope you like this feature. Sedat TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
Proposal: register user with e-mail activation
Hello, I add a new property to roller that is related with the activation of user account via e-mail when the user register to the system. A brief summary of what i do: - i add a property to the roller.properties so that a user can turn on/off the registration of user with e-mail activation (property is user.account.activation.enabled). if user.account.activation.enabled=false, then a user can directly register to the roller, as it is done normally. if user.account.activation.enabled=true, then a user has to activate his/her account by clicking the link in the activation mail (when a user registers to roller, i save the user by setting the enabled property as false so that he/she can not login. Then, I create an activation code, associate it with this user, and send this code to the user via e-mail. When user clicks the link in this e-mail, user account is activated by setting the enabled property of this user to true and then the related activation code record is deleted from the database). I sent this email with the patch for the roller 3.0 as an attachment before, but this mail is not delivered to the roller-dev mail list. So, i put this file on jroller (http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerProperty.jar); note that the extension of the file is indeed .zip. jroller does not allow to upload files with .zip extensions. Due to this reason, i change the extension of the file to .jar ( by renaming it) in order to upload it to the jroller. So, when you download it, change its extension to .zip . If you copy and paste the files to the roller 3.0 src and compile it, it will work. I do not try with roller 3.1 but i hope it will work (in this case, you have to copy the related code segments to the existing files in the roller 3.1 since there may be changes on these files after roller 3.0). I hope you like this feature. Sedat TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/
Re: Proposal: register user with e-mail activation
I reprepare a single DIFF patch file plus the new added file and put them into the ( http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerPropertyVer2.jar ) (i also put the all of the files that i changed if anyone needs). Please, forget the previous link, and look at this new file. note that the extension of the file is indeed .zip. jroller does not allow to upload files with .zip extensions. Due to this reason, i change the extension of the file to .jar ( by renaming it) in order to upload it to the jroller. So, when you download it, change its extension to .zip . Sedat --- sedat ciftci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I add a new property to roller that is related with the activation of user account via e-mail when the user register to the system. A brief summary of what i do: - i add a property to the roller.properties so that a user can turn on/off the registration of user with e-mail activation (property is user.account.activation.enabled). if user.account.activation.enabled=false, then a user can directly register to the roller, as it is done normally. if user.account.activation.enabled=true, then a user has to activate his/her account by clicking the link in the activation mail (when a user registers to roller, i save the user by setting the enabled property as false so that he/she can not login. Then, I create an activation code, associate it with this user, and send this code to the user via e-mail. When user clicks the link in this e-mail, user account is activated by setting the enabled property of this user to true and then the related activation code record is deleted from the database). I sent this email with the patch for the roller 3.0 as an attachment before, but this mail is not delivered to the roller-dev mail list. So, i put this file on jroller (http://www.jroller.com/resources/s/sedat/newRollerProperty.jar); note that the extension of the file is indeed .zip. jroller does not allow to upload files with .zip extensions. Due to this reason, i change the extension of the file to .jar ( by renaming it) in order to upload it to the jroller. So, when you download it, change its extension to .zip . If you copy and paste the files to the roller 3.0 src and compile it, it will work. I do not try with roller 3.1 but i hope it will work (in this case, you have to copy the related code segments to the existing files in the roller 3.1 since there may be changes on these files after roller 3.0). I hope you like this feature. Sedat TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
