Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?

2009-11-23 Thread Daryle Lockhart
Sadly, his casting of lighter actors works because of the time the  
film is set in. I remember New York in the 80s very well. We don't  
like to discuss this, but we were a pretty color struck society then.  
The popular actors and singers at the time were light. It's one of the  
reasons Spike Lee's School Daze worked.


I have problems with the film but they are technical. I didn't like  
the way it was edited, for example.


Also, some of the symbolism was a little heavy handed. But overall  
this movie's success is what indie film needed.



Daryle Lockhart

On Nov 23, 2009, at 2:41 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:

I'm bothered that the director didn't change his or her perception  
of fat people until he made the film. He's no spring chicken.


I think that the light skinned vs dark skinned thing is still going  
on but it is a lot more subtle. Hollywood still prefers the light  
skinned blacks as the good guy character.



On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
 wrote:




I'm prejudiced against people who are darker than me...When I was  
young, I went to a church where the lighter-skinned you were, the  
closer you sat to the altar.  --Lee Daniels, director of Precious.




***



I will drop a review of Precious in the next couple of days. Short  
answer: I loved the film, though it's difficult to watch at times  
( i will say, due to all the hype, it's not as bad as I'd expected,  
since I was prepared for a lot more graphic abuse depicted).  One  
thing that does bother me about the film, now that I've heard it  
mentioned, is that the good people in it are all light-skinned.  
Indeed, Paula Patton, Lenny Kravitz, and Mariah Carey are all  
biracial. The bad people are all dark skinned.




It's interesting that director Lee Daniels admits he's had some  
issues on the color  line, as noted in the article below.  
Interesting discussion on skin colour, that's unfortunately still  
relevant today, and interesting that in a film meant to explore the  
issues we all have, some of the creative work behind it reveals some  
of the same problems.




*

http://racerelations.about.com/b/2009/11/08/what-precious-means-for-race-relations.htm

What Precious Means for Race Relations

Sunday November 8, 2009
The film Precious premiered in select cities Nov. 6, and reviews  
are pouring in about the movie with a Harlem teen whose life  
transforms through education. To say that the circumstances of  
Precious Jones' life are bleak would be an understatement. Precious  
is illiterate, living with HIV and has been victimized by her  
parents in numerous ways, including sexually. Her father has twice  
impregnated her, and one child she's borne by him suffers from Down  
syndrome.




Precious tackles an array of issues. Because the protagonist is  
black, however, both the media and the public have raised questions  
about its effect on race relations. I've summed up two major  
questions about the film below:




Why do white audiences eat up black films and novels that depict  
dysfunction, poverty and abuse?


Why are the villains in Precious dark-skinned and the heroes light- 
skinned?




Precious is based on the novel Push by Sapphire. Both the film and  
the book have been compared to Alice Walker's The Color Purple and  
Toni Morrison's The Bluest Eye in that they, too, garnered praise  
from white critics and featured emotional and sexual abuse of black  
youth by family members. The fact that these works feature abuse  
isn't in and of itself a problem. The problem is how the mainstream  
receives these works. I have no problem if viewers and critics  
regard Precious et al. as representations of particular black  
families. On the other hand, I do object to viewers and critics who  
regard a film like Precious as the only authentic black experience  
and a television program such as The Cosby Show as inauthentic.  
The fact is both of these slices of black life are authentic.




I do understand, though, why some members of the black community  
have criticized Precious. Positive images of blacks in the media  
remain few and far between. In comedies, blacks are portrayed as  
buffoonish, cartoonish and uncouth. Films such as Norbit, Doctor  
Dolittle and Big Momma's House, not to mention any Tyler Perry  
flick, mock black womanhood. And on the dramatic end, we've had  
stories of gang warfare, virulent racism and abusive or absentee  
parents.




There's no doubt in my mind that media portrayals of people of color  
can lead to racial stereotyping. I'm reminded of a former classmate  
from a Mexican-American family from East L.A. Her roommate freshman  
year was a Midwesterner who, upon seeing the gang film Mi Vida  
Loca, said that she didn't realize my classmate had lived such a  
hard life. My friend laughed and told her 

Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?

2009-11-23 Thread Mr. Worf
I think that some areas were a little more skin sensitive than others but
I do remember some of the controversy back then. Especially when Prince, the
Debarges were big.

On a side topic, there was a post that I read a few months ago that asked
the question should black women wear lipstick. The author of the post
believed that dark skinned black women should never wear lipstick. There
were some other weirdness mixed into it that sounded a lot like
pseudo-religious mess, but I thought that it was interesting.

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Daryle Lockhart
dar...@darylelockhart.comwrote:



 Sadly, his casting of lighter actors works because of the time the film is
 set in. I remember New York in the 80s very well. We don't like to discuss
 this, but we were a pretty color struck society then. The popular actors and
 singers at the time were light. It's one of the reasons Spike Lee's School
 Daze worked.

 I have problems with the film but they are technical. I didn't like the way
 it was edited, for example.

 Also, some of the symbolism was a little heavy handed. But overall this
 movie's success is what indie film needed.


 Daryle Lockhart

 On Nov 23, 2009, at 2:41 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 I'm bothered that the director didn't change his or her perception of fat
 people until he made the film. He's no spring chicken.

 I think that the light skinned vs dark skinned thing is still going on but
 it is a lot more subtle. Hollywood still prefers the light skinned blacks as
 the good guy character.

 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Keith Johnson 
 KeithBJohnson@keithbjohn...@comcast.net
 comcast.net wrote:




 *I'm prejudiced against people who are darker than me...When I was
 young, I went to a church where the lighter-skinned you were, the closer you
 sat to the altar.  --Lee Daniels, director of Precious.*



 ***



 I will drop a review of Precious in the next couple of days. Short
 answer: I loved the film, though it's difficult to watch at times ( i will
 say, due to all the hype, it's not as bad as I'd expected, since I was
 prepared for a lot more graphic abuse depicted).  One thing that does bother
 me about the film, now that I've heard it mentioned, is that the good people
 in it are all light-skinned. Indeed, Paula Patton, Lenny Kravitz, and Mariah
 Carey are all biracial. The bad people are all dark skinned.



 It's interesting that director Lee Daniels admits he's had some issues on
 the color  line, as noted in the article below. Interesting discussion on
 skin colour, that's unfortunately still relevant today, and interesting that
 in a film meant to explore the issues we all have, some of the creative work
 behind it reveals some of the same problems.



 *
 http://racerelations.about.com/b/2009/11/08/what-precious-means-for-race-relations.htm
 http://racerelation
 s.about.com/b/2009/11/08/what-precious-means-for-race-relations.htm What
 Precious Means for Race Relations
 Sunday November 8, 2009

 The film Precious http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0929632/ premiered in
 select cities Nov. 6, and reviews are pouring in about the movie with a
 Harlem teen whose life transforms through education. To say that the
 circumstances of Precious Jones' life are bleak would be an understatement.
 Precious is illiterate, living with HIV and has been victimized by her
 parents in numerous ways, including sexually. Her father has twice
 impregnated her, and one child she's borne by him suffers from Down
 syndromehttp://downsyndrome.about.com/od/downsyndromebasics/a/downsynessen.htm.




 Precious tackles an array of issues. Because the protagonist is black,
 however, both the media and the public have raised questions about its
 effect on race relations. I've summed up two major questions about the film
 below:



 Why do white audiences eat up black films and novels that depict
 dysfunction, poverty and abuse?

 Why are the villains in Precious dark-skinned and the heroes
 light-skinned?



 Precious is based on the novel 
 *Push*http://www.amazon.com/Push-Novel-Sapphire/dp/0679766758/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_topby
  Sapphire. Both the film and the book have been compared to Alice Walker's
 *The Color 
 Purple*http://www.amazon.com/Color-Purple-Musical-Tie/dp/0156031825/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1257731466sr=1-1and
  Toni Morrison's
 *The Bluest 
 Eye*http://www.amazon.com/Bluest-Eye-Vintage-International/dp/0307278441/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1257731104sr=1-1in
  that they, too, garnered praise from white critics and featured emotional
 and sexual abuse of black youth by family members. The fact that these works
 feature abuse isn't in and of itself a problem. The problem is how the
 mainstream receives these works. I have no problem if viewers and critics
 regard Precious et al. as representations of particular black families. On
 the other hand, I do 

Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?

2009-11-23 Thread Keith Johnson


Well, I at least give Daniels credit for acknowledging his own prejudices. We 
all have them: the problem is those who don't confront and try to change them. 
I try very consciously to ask myself why I feel certain ways and then analyze 
the root of those feelings. I'm always struck by the odd forms prejudice can 
take. For example, i'm well acquainted with our internal skin-color problems in 
playing favorites with each other. But I've never heard of it being a 
requirement for sitting up front at a church. Indeed, I always experienced that 
if the minister, for example, were really dark skinned, that didn't matter as 
long as he could deliver a great, sweat-producting, Bible-thumping, sermon! 
Perhaps I'm familiar with some people not being accepted into certain social 
circles 'cause of skin color, but sitting in pews? That's a new one. 



And then there is the issue of skin in relation to gender. a black man can be 
dark skinned and considered good looking, like a Tyrease or Denzel Washington. 
But by and large, dark-skinned Sisters are still not as quickly called 
beautiful as medium to lighter skinned sisters. I had long discussion with a 
very close relative of mine recently--a woman!--who told me that dark skinned 
women were automatically unattractive, no matter their facial features. Dark 
skinned men? She loves 'em!  She heard all the arguments I put forth at how 
that was unfair, blatantly wrong, and a legacy of white indoctrination, but she 
held to.   And add to *that* the idea sometimes that even dark skinned men can 
get the dubious compliment of being seen as more dangerous, more mysterious, a 
bit edgier and rougher than their lighter-skinned brothers. Jacked up, i tell 
you. 



Even if one gets over our self-hatred skin color problems, issues of weight 
still remain, and cut across ethnic lines. I have two good friends--both 
male--who are very dark skinned. Neither has a skin color problem with black 
women, but each has issues with overweight people, to the point I've had to 
confront them about it. One, for example, visited here in Atlanta, and then 
dropped a Facebook comment at how many fat women there were. Aside from the 
fact that he was referencing mostly Sisters, and also that he ignored 
everything else about atlanta to comment on that, I found the attack on the 
overweight disturbing.  the other friend once casually commented on how he saw 
a fat guy at the grocery store, and thought he'll be dead or diabetic before 
he's 50. He ought not be allowed to have children if he's so irresponsible with 
his own body.  



I get all the health issues involved, but there's care and concern, and then 
there's contempt. So a Precious, who's dark, overweight, under educated, and a 
woman? Hell, that is a lot of burdens to bear! 


- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 2:41:41 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting? 

  




I'm bothered that the director didn't change his or her perception of fat 
people until he made the film. He's no spring chicken. 

I think that the light skinned vs dark skinned thing is still going on but it 
is a lot more subtle. Hollywood still prefers the light skinned blacks as the 
good guy character. 


On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@comcast.net  
wrote: 









I'm prejudiced against people who are darker than me...When I was young, I 
went to a church where the lighter-skinned you were, the closer you sat to the 
altar.  --Lee Daniels, director of Precious. 



*** 



I will drop a review of Precious in the next couple of days. Short answer: I 
loved the film, though it's difficult to watch at times ( i will say, due to 
all the hype, it's not as bad as I'd expected, since I was prepared for a lot 
more graphic abuse depicted).  One thing that does bother me about the film, 
now that I've heard it mentioned, is that the good people in it are all 
light-skinned. Indeed, Paula Patton, Lenny Kravitz, and Mariah Carey are all 
biracial. The bad people are all dark skinned.  



It's interesting that director Lee Daniels admits he's had some issues on the 
color  line, as noted in the article below. Interesting discussion on skin 
colour, that's unfortunately still relevant today, and interesting that in a 
film meant to explore the issues we all have, some of the creative work behind 
it reveals some of the same problems. 



* 
http://racerelations.about.com/b/2009/11/08/what-precious-means-for-race-relations.htm
 
What Precious Means for Race Relations 

Sunday November 8, 2009 


The film  Precious  premiered in select cities Nov. 6, and reviews are 
pouring in about the movie with a Harlem teen whose life transforms through 
education. To say

Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?

2009-11-23 Thread Keith Johnson


But the point is, the book's author specifically crafted a teacher who wasn't 
light skinned. i hear you about the times, but even in thh old days, there 
were darker skinned people who made a difference and deserve to be showcased. 



This really is about Daniels' prejudices, which will show up no matter the time 
period or reason one has for justifying them. For example, I'm convinced a lot 
of Brothers so quickly supported Halle Berry's career not just because she's 
not dark, but because they knew she was half white, and the thought of that was 
alluring. It's the same reason so many go nuts over the Kim Kardassian or 
Jennifer Lopez: they get some aspects of a Sister's traits (the butt in both 
cases), but get the mental titillation of it being a non-black woman.  A few 
years ago I was talking to a large group of Brothers at my job about some women 
they were dating, and a club they frequented. Half a dozen guys, and the 
conversation started focusing on how many half-Asian, half Black women there 
were at this club. The response from all was as if they'd discoverd the 
Treasure of the Sierra Madre. I was bothered by the understood thought that the 
woman being half Asian made her more desirable than a woman who was just 
black. 



But still and all, as you say, I liked the movie a great deal. I too thought 
the editing was a bit rough, especially in the first twenty minutes. But it 
settled down and became a powerful film. I actually like that even the 
director's prejudices have become a topic of discussion, as, like the story the 
movie tells, it's something that needs to be addressed. And I agree it's just 
what indie films needed. 



Speaking of powerful indie films, ever seen Sankofa? If not, make it a goal 
to find it and do so. Wonderful movie. 




- Original Message - 
From: Daryle Lockhart dar...@darylelockhart.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Cc: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:12:23 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting? 

  





Sadly, his casting of lighter actors works because of the time the film is set 
in. I remember New York in the 80s very well. We don't like to discuss this, 
but we were a pretty color struck society then. The popular actors and singers 
at the time were light. It's one of the reasons Spike Lee's School Daze 
worked.  


I have problems with the film but they are technical. I didn't like the way it 
was edited, for example.  


Also, some of the symbolism was a little heavy handed. But overall this movie's 
success is what indie film needed. 



Daryle Lockhart 

On Nov 23, 2009, at 2:41 AM, Mr. Worf  hellomahog...@gmail.com  wrote: 





  


I'm bothered that the director didn't change his or her perception of fat 
people until he made the film. He's no spring chicken. 

I think that the light skinned vs dark skinned thing is still going on but it 
is a lot more subtle. Hollywood still prefers the light skinned blacks as the 
good guy character. 


On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Keith Johnson  KeithBJohnson@ comcast.net  
wrote: 









I'm prejudiced against people who are darker than me...When I was young, I 
went to a church where the lighter-skinned you were, the closer you sat to the 
altar.  --Lee Daniels, director of Precious. 



*** 



I will drop a review of Precious in the next couple of days. Short answer: I 
loved the film, though it's difficult to watch at times ( i will say, due to 
all the hype, it's not as bad as I'd expected, since I was prepared for a lot 
more graphic abuse depicted).  One thing that does bother me about the film, 
now that I've heard it mentioned, is that the good people in it are all 
light-skinned. Indeed, Paula Patton, Lenny Kravitz, and Mariah Carey are all 
biracial. The bad people are all dark skinned.  



It's interesting that director Lee Daniels admits he's had some issues on the 
color  line, as noted in the article below. Interesting discussion on skin 
colour, that's unfortunately still relevant today, and interesting that in a 
film meant to explore the issues we all have, some of the creative work behind 
it reveals some of the same problems. 



* 
http://racerelation 
s.about.com/b/2009/11/08/what-precious-means-for-race-relations.htm 
What Precious Means for Race Relations 

Sunday November 8, 2009 


The film  Precious  premiered in select cities Nov. 6, and reviews are 
pouring in about the movie with a Harlem teen whose life transforms through 
education. To say that the circumstances of Precious Jones' life are bleak 
would be an understatement. Precious is illiterate, living with HIV and has 
been victimized by her parents in numerous ways, including sexually. Her father 
has twice impregnated her, and one child she's borne by him suffers from Down 
syndrome

Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?

2009-11-23 Thread Keith Johnson


When I was growing up in Texas in the '60s and '70s, there was a lot of talk 
about colors applied to black women, be it lipstick, eye shadow, rouge, or even 
the color of clothing they wore . It was often felt that darker-skinned black 
women had no business wearing really red lipstick, for example. Now, if the 
sole objection were that many black people already have naturally pink or brown 
lips, that'd be one thing. My wife, for example, has a beautiful tone to her 
lips that is a mix of slight pink and soft brown. She doesn't need lipstick, 
just like many sisters. But she chooses to wear it, in shades from red to 
brown,a nd I'm cool with that. But the context was usually that the red 
lipstick looked bad against really dark skin. Of course, lighter skinned sister 
got more of a pass. 



Clothing was a big thing too. I remember some of my aunts and older cousins 
saying things such as I can't believe she's wearing that loud orange dress as 
black as she is!. It seemed that any bright colors--reds, oranges, yellows, 
etc--were verboten for dark skinned people. There were often comments about our 
kin from Africa who'd wear such loud clothing, and how it didn't look good on 
them.   When I moved here to Atlanta, my wife and I attended a Caribbean 
parade. Talk about a breath of fresh air! I had never seen so many colors on so 
many people of so many hues, especially dark. Now, I had of course seen blacks 
dress in vivid colors all my life, such as high school bands, people in church, 
etc. But the number and variety in that parade was a whole new level. It helped 
me shake off the last vestiges of even entertaining that bright colors are only 
for bright people. 


- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:26:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting? 

  




I think that some areas were a little more skin sensitive than others but I 
do remember some of the controversy back then. Especially when Prince, the 
Debarges were big. 

On a side topic, there was a post that I read a few months ago that asked the 
question should black women wear lipstick. The author of the post believed that 
dark skinned black women should never wear lipstick. There were some other 
weirdness mixed into it that sounded a lot like pseudo-religious mess, but I 
thought that it was interesting. 


On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Daryle Lockhart  dar...@darylelockhart.com  
wrote: 






Sadly, his casting of lighter actors works because of the time the film is set 
in. I remember New York in the 80s very well. We don't like to discuss this, 
but we were a pretty color struck society then. The popular actors and singers 
at the time were light. It's one of the reasons Spike Lee's School Daze 
worked.  


I have problems with the film but they are technical. I didn't like the way it 
was edited, for example.  


Also, some of the symbolism was a little heavy handed. But overall this movie's 
success is what indie film needed. 



Daryle Lockhart 




On Nov 23, 2009, at 2:41 AM, Mr. Worf  hellomahog...@gmail.com  wrote: 





  





I'm bothered that the director didn't change his or her perception of fat 
people until he made the film. He's no spring chicken. 

I think that the light skinned vs dark skinned thing is still going on but it 
is a lot more subtle. Hollywood still prefers the light skinned blacks as the 
good guy character. 


On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Keith Johnson  KeithBJohnson@ comcast.net  
wrote: 









I'm prejudiced against people who are darker than me...When I was young, I 
went to a church where the lighter-skinned you were, the closer you sat to the 
altar.  --Lee Daniels, director of Precious. 



*** 



I will drop a review of Precious in the next couple of days. Short answer: I 
loved the film, though it's difficult to watch at times ( i will say, due to 
all the hype, it's not as bad as I'd expected, since I was prepared for a lot 
more graphic abuse depicted).  One thing that does bother me about the film, 
now that I've heard it mentioned, is that the good people in it are all 
light-skinned. Indeed, Paula Patton, Lenny Kravitz, and Mariah Carey are all 
biracial. The bad people are all dark skinned.  



It's interesting that director Lee Daniels admits he's had some issues on the 
color  line, as noted in the article below. Interesting discussion on skin 
colour, that's unfortunately still relevant today, and interesting that in a 
film meant to explore the issues we all have, some of the creative work behind 
it reveals some of the same problems. 



* 
http://racerelation 
s.about.com/b/2009/11/08/what-precious-means-for-race-relations.htm 
What Precious Means for Race Relations 

Sunday November 8, 2009

Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?

2009-11-23 Thread Mr. Worf
A lot of that is self imposed racial thinking. We were keeping ourselves
down by then after years of social programming to hate ourselves. That is
the true danger of racism.



On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 When I was growing up in Texas in the '60s and '70s, there was a lot of
 talk about colors applied to black women, be it lipstick, eye shadow, rouge,
 or even the color of clothing they wore. It was often felt that
 darker-skinned black women had no business wearing really red lipstick, for
 example. Now, if the sole objection were that many black people already have
 naturally pink or brown lips, that'd be one thing. My wife, for example, has
 a beautiful tone to her lips that is a mix of slight pink and soft brown.
 She doesn't need lipstick, just like many sisters. But she chooses to wear
 it, in shades from red to brown,a nd I'm cool with that. But the context was
 usually that the red lipstick looked bad against really dark skin. Of
 course, lighter skinned sister got more of a pass.



 Clothing was a big thing too. I remember some of my aunts and older cousins
 saying things such as I can't believe she's wearing that loud orange dress
 as black as she is!. It seemed that any bright colors--reds, oranges,
 yellows, etc--were verboten for dark skinned people. There were often
 comments about our kin from Africa who'd wear such loud clothing, and how it
 didn't look good on them.  When I moved here to Atlanta, my wife and I
 attended a Caribbean parade. Talk about a breath of fresh air! I had never
 seen so many colors on so many people of so many hues, especially dark. Now,
 I had of course seen blacks dress in vivid colors all my life, such as high
 school bands, people in church, etc. But the number and variety in that
 parade was a whole new level. It helped me shake off the last vestiges of
 even entertaining that bright colors are only for bright people.
 ess/



Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?

2009-11-23 Thread Keith Johnson


Yep, you can remove the bars, but the prison cell remains 


- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 8:52:56 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting? 

  




A lot of that is self imposed racial thinking. We were keeping ourselves down 
by then after years of social programming to hate ourselves. That is the true 
danger of racism. 




On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@comcast.net  
wrote: 








When I was growing up in Texas in the '60s and '70s, there was a lot of talk 
about colors applied to black women, be it lipstick, eye shadow, rouge, or even 
the color of clothing they wore. It was often felt that darker-skinned black 
women had no business wearing really red lipstick, for example. Now, if the 
sole objection were that many black people already have naturally pink or brown 
lips, that'd be one thing. My wife, for example, has a beautiful tone to her 
lips that is a mix of slight pink and soft brown. She doesn't need lipstick, 
just like many sisters. But she chooses to wear it, in shades from red to 
brown,a nd I'm cool with that. But the context was usually that the red 
lipstick looked bad against really dark skin. Of course, lighter skinned sister 
got more of a pass. 



Clothing was a big thing too. I remember some of my aunts and older cousins 
saying things such as I can't believe she's wearing that loud orange dress as 
black as she is!. It seemed that any bright colors--reds, oranges, yellows, 
etc--were verboten for dark skinned people. There were often comments about our 
kin from Africa who'd wear such loud clothing, and how it didn't look good on 
them.  When I moved here to Atlanta, my wife and I attended a Caribbean parade. 
Talk about a breath of fresh air! I had never seen so many colors on so many 
people of so many hues, especially dark. Now, I had of course seen blacks dress 
in vivid colors all my life, such as high school bands, people in church, etc. 
But the number and variety in that parade was a whole new level. It helped me 
shake off the last vestiges of even entertaining that bright colors are only 
for bright people. ess/ 





Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?

2009-11-23 Thread Mr. Worf
It reminds me of the story about how they train elephants. When they are
young they chain them with big oversize chains. When they become adult
elephants they can easily snap the chains, but they never do.

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 Yep, you can remove the bars, but the prison cell remains


 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 8:52:56 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?



 A lot of that is self imposed racial thinking. We were keeping ourselves
 down by then after years of social programming to hate ourselves. That is
 the true danger of racism.



 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Keith Johnson 
 keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



  When I was growing up in Texas in the '60s and '70s, there was a lot of
 talk about colors applied to black women, be it lipstick, eye shadow, rouge,
 or even the color of clothing they wore. It was often felt that
 darker-skinned black women had no business wearing really red lipstick, for
 example. Now, if the sole objection were that many black people already have
 naturally pink or brown lips, that'd be one thing. My wife, for example, has
 a beautiful tone to her lips that is a mix of slight pink and soft brown.
 She doesn't need lipstick, just like many sisters. But she chooses to wear
 it, in shades from red to brown,a nd I'm cool with that. But the context was
 usually that the red lipstick looked bad against really dark skin. Of
 course, lighter skinned sister got more of a pass.



 Clothing was a big thing too. I remember some of my aunts and older
 cousins saying things such as I can't believe she's wearing that loud
 orange dress as black as she is!. It seemed that any bright colors--reds,
 oranges, yellows, etc--were verboten for dark skinned people. There were
 often comments about our kin from Africa who'd wear such loud clothing, and
 how it didn't look good on them.  When I moved here to Atlanta, my wife and
 I attended a Caribbean parade. Talk about a breath of fresh air! I had never
 seen so many colors on so many people of so many hues, especially dark. Now,
 I had of course seen blacks dress in vivid colors all my life, such as high
 school bands, people in church, etc. But the number and variety in that
 parade was a whole new level. It helped me shake off the last vestiges of
 even entertaining that bright colors are only for bright people.
 ess/



 




-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for over 9 years!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


Re: [scifinoir2] Skin Color Prejudice in Precious Casting?

2009-11-22 Thread Mr. Worf
I'm bothered that the director didn't change his or her perception of fat
people until he made the film. He's no spring chicken.

I think that the light skinned vs dark skinned thing is still going on but
it is a lot more subtle. Hollywood still prefers the light skinned blacks as
the good guy character.

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:




 *I'm prejudiced against people who are darker than me...When I was young,
 I went to a church where the lighter-skinned you were, the closer you sat to
 the altar.  --Lee Daniels, director of Precious.*



 ***



 I will drop a review of Precious in the next couple of days. Short
 answer: I loved the film, though it's difficult to watch at times ( i will
 say, due to all the hype, it's not as bad as I'd expected, since I was
 prepared for a lot more graphic abuse depicted).  One thing that does bother
 me about the film, now that I've heard it mentioned, is that the good people
 in it are all light-skinned. Indeed, Paula Patton, Lenny Kravitz, and Mariah
 Carey are all biracial. The bad people are all dark skinned.



 It's interesting that director Lee Daniels admits he's had some issues on
 the color  line, as noted in the article below. Interesting discussion on
 skin colour, that's unfortunately still relevant today, and interesting that
 in a film meant to explore the issues we all have, some of the creative work
 behind it reveals some of the same problems.



 *

 http://racerelations.about.com/b/2009/11/08/what-precious-means-for-race-relations.htm
  What
 Precious Means for Race Relations
 Sunday November 8, 2009

 The film Precious http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0929632/ premiered in
 select cities Nov. 6, and reviews are pouring in about the movie with a
 Harlem teen whose life transforms through education. To say that the
 circumstances of Precious Jones' life are bleak would be an understatement.
 Precious is illiterate, living with HIV and has been victimized by her
 parents in numerous ways, including sexually. Her father has twice
 impregnated her, and one child she's borne by him suffers from Down
 syndromehttp://downsyndrome.about.com/od/downsyndromebasics/a/downsynessen.htm.




 Precious tackles an array of issues. Because the protagonist is black,
 however, both the media and the public have raised questions about its
 effect on race relations. I've summed up two major questions about the film
 below:



 Why do white audiences eat up black films and novels that depict
 dysfunction, poverty and abuse?

 Why are the villains in Precious dark-skinned and the heroes
 light-skinned?



 Precious is based on the novel 
 *Push*http://www.amazon.com/Push-Novel-Sapphire/dp/0679766758/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_topby
  Sapphire. Both the film and the book have been compared to Alice Walker's
 *The Color 
 Purple*http://www.amazon.com/Color-Purple-Musical-Tie/dp/0156031825/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1257731466sr=1-1and
  Toni Morrison's
 *The Bluest 
 Eye*http://www.amazon.com/Bluest-Eye-Vintage-International/dp/0307278441/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1257731104sr=1-1in
  that they, too, garnered praise from white critics and featured emotional
 and sexual abuse of black youth by family members. The fact that these works
 feature abuse isn't in and of itself a problem. The problem is how the
 mainstream receives these works. I have no problem if viewers and critics
 regard Precious et al. as representations of particular black families. On
 the other hand, I do object to viewers and critics who regard a film like
 Precious as the only authentic black experience and a television program
 such as The Cosby Show http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086687/ as
 inauthentic. The fact is both of these slices of black life are authentic.



 I do understand, though, why some members of the black community have
 criticized Precious. Positive images of blacks in the media remain few and
 far between. In comedies, blacks are portrayed as buffoonish, cartoonish and
 uncouth. Films such as Norbit http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0477051/, 
 Doctor
 Dolittle http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118998/ and Big Momma's 
 Househttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0208003/,
 not to mention any Tyler Perry http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1347153/flick, 
 mock black womanhood. And on the dramatic end, we've had stories of
 gang warfare, virulent racism and abusive or absentee parents.



 There's no doubt in my mind that media portrayals of people of color can
 lead to racial stereotyping. I'm reminded of a former classmate from a
 Mexican-American family from East L.A. Her roommate freshman year was a
 Midwesterner who, upon seeing the gang film Mi Vida 
 Locahttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107566/,
 said that she didn't realize my classmate had lived such a hard life. My
 friend laughed and told her that she had little in common with the Mi Vida