[Sipp-users] Unstable release for sipp 3.1 win32 with authentication!
Hello, For the benefit of users, I have put a version of sipp 3.1 for win32 compiled with ossl support on sourceforge. Though all the new authentication features added after 3.0 may not yet be tested fully for win32, so its still unstable. You can download it from following link: http://sourceforge.net/project/downloading.php?group_id=104305use_mirror=osdnfilename=sipp-win32-3.1.2-ossl.exe94855486 Thanks anuj - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] How to accept SIP calls generated by SIPp tool
Hi, I'm not sure what your application is intended to do, but I think it should send 200 OK response to accept a call (and then be ready to receive subsequents requests and respond to them). If you want just to talk between two sipp's running on two computers, run the calling one with uac scenario and the receiving one with uas. But, in this case there is no place for you application :/ Regarding documentation, you may look at section Using SIPp in the official doc at http://sipp.sourceforge.net/doc/reference.html Also look at the scenarios that can be dumped with -sd option. So you will know what messages are actually sent and what is expected from the other side. Best regards -- Tomasz Radziszewski Senior Software Engineer Ericpol Telecom sp. z o.o. Madalinskiego 9, 30-303 Krakow, Poland e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ericpol.com/ Hi all, I'm using SIPp2.0 RHEL 4 version. I simulated some SIP calls (Machine 1) and I can see in my application (Machine 2) that calls were made. How can I accept those SIPp calls in my application? Do I need to install SIPp on the machine where my application (Machine 2) is running? If yes, which mode I have to use. Please help me with some basic document about the SiPp tool and how to start with? Regards, Manoj kumar M S - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
[Sipp-users] AKAv1-MD5
Consider the following scenario ... scenario name=AKAv1-MD5_BASIC recv request=REGISTER /recv send ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Max-Forwards: 70 WWW-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=AKAv1-MD5,nonce=dcd98b7102dd2f0e8b11d0f600bfb0c093,opaque=5ccc069c403ebaf9f0171e9517f40e41,qop=auth,auth-int,realm=localhost Content-Length: 0 ]] /send recv request=REGISTER action ereg check_it = true regexp=Authorization: ([[:alnum:]]*) search_in=msg assign_to=12/ ereg check_it = true regexp=response=([[:alnum:]]*) search_in=Authorization assign_to=resp/ /action /recv send retrans=500 ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 200 OK [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Contact: user sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;expires=3600 Expires: 3600 Content-Length: 0 ]] /send /scenario Any help is appreciated Regards Venkat __ Not happy with your email address?. Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] AKAv1-MD5
Sorry for my previous incomplete mail Consider the following scenario ... in this scenario, how can i actually verify if the peer has sent the correct response in Authorization field? in the second REGISTER ? scenario name=AKAv1-MD5_BASIC recv request=REGISTER /recv send ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Max-Forwards: 70 WWW-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=AKAv1-MD5,nonce=dcd98b7102dd2f0e8b11d0f600bfb0c093,opaque=5ccc069c403ebaf9f0171e9517f40e41,qop=auth,auth-int,realm=localhost Content-Length: 0 ]] /send recv request=REGISTER action ereg check_it = true regexp=Authorization: ([[:alnum:]]*) search_in=msg assign_to=12/ ereg check_it = true regexp=response=([[:alnum:]]*) search_in=Authorization assign_to=resp/ /action /recv send retrans=500 ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 200 OK [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Contact: user sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;expires=3600 Expires: 3600 Content-Length: 0 ]] /send /scenario Any help is appreciated Regards Venkat Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! __ Not happy with your email address?. Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] AKAv1-MD5
You'll need a recent SIPp trunk version and to use the verifyauth action. It looks something like recv request=REGISTER / verifyauth assign_to=goodauth username=username password=password / /recv username and password can be any message substitution, and you can do branching based on the return value stored in goodauth. Charles Venkat Narasimhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/04/2008 08:05 AM To sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject Re: [Sipp-users] AKAv1-MD5 Sorry for my previous incomplete mail Consider the following scenario ... in this scenario, how can i actually verify if the peer has sent the correct response in Authorization field? in the second REGISTER ? scenario name=AKAv1-MD5_BASIC recv request=REGISTER /recv send ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Max-Forwards: 70 WWW-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=AKAv1-MD5,nonce=dcd98b7102dd2f0e8b11d0f600bfb0c093,opaque=5ccc069c403ebaf9f0171e9517f40e41,qop=auth,auth-int,realm=localhost Content-Length: 0 ]] /send recv request=REGISTER action ereg check_it = true regexp=Authorization: ([[:alnum:]]*) search_in=msg assign_to=12/ ereg check_it = true regexp=response=([[:alnum:]]*) search_in=Authorization assign_to=resp/ /action /recv send retrans=500 ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 200 OK [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Contact: user sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;expires=3600 Expires: 3600 Content-Length: 0 ]] /send /scenario Any help is appreciated Regards Venkat Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
[Sipp-users] Variable $5 is referenced 1 times!
Hi, I'm trying to find the contact uri from a 200 OK response sent by the UAC, but sipp apparently isn't happy about the scenario file syntax. I keep getting this error: Variable $5 is referenced 1 times! is this correct? recv response=200 rtd=true rrs=true action ereg regexp=sip:.*;transport=.*SIP/2.0 search_in=hdr header=Contact: check_it=true assign_to=5,6 / /action /recv Thanks, Sajith. -- the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne. -- Chaucer. - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] Variable $5 is referenced 1 times!
Hi, It's probably about an unused vatiable. I had this error in sipp 3.1 when I extracted something with ereg, but never used the variable. It is strange, because it should rather say that it's referenced 0 times. The error goes away if you use every extracted variable somewhere in the scenario. In sipp 3.0, I didn't get this error even if there were unused variables. Another thing is that you should probably use parentheses () in the regular expression if you assign to more than one variable. The, the first variable will contain the whole expression and the next ones will contain the part that matches the content of each parentheses. So you should probably have ereg regexp=sip:(.*);transport=(.*)SIP/2.0 ... assign_to=1,5,6/ And then you will have 1 - the whole contact beginning with sip: and ending with SIP/2.0 (first variable always gets the whole expression) 5 - the sip uri (the part between sip: and ;transport) 6 - the transport And last but not least - do you really have SIP/2.0 in Contact header? In one of my tests, it looks as follows Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:16175;transport=UDP Hope this helps -- Tomasz Radziszewski Senior Software Engineer Ericpol Telecom sp. z o.o. Madalinskiego 9, 30-303 Krakow, Poland e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ericpol.pl/ Hi, I'm trying to find the contact uri from a 200 OK response sent by the UAC, but sipp apparently isn't happy about the scenario file syntax. I keep getting this error: Variable $5 is referenced 1 times! is this correct? recv response=200 rtd=true rrs=true action ereg regexp=sip:.*;transport=.*SIP/2.0 search_in=hdr header=Contact: check_it=true assign_to=5,6 / /action /recv Thanks, Sajith. - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] Variable $5 is referenced 1 times!
The only referenced once check is there to prevent typos and other similar errors that would have SIPp load a scenario with a variable only used once (the theory being why do you need to read or write to a variable if you never read or write from it again, basically like an unused variable warning from your compiler). If you don't need $5, you can use it for something unneeded like: assign assign_to=5 value=0 / I would rename 5 to something like dummy (you can use string names not just numeric names, which makes the scenario much more readable). A better long term solution would be to modify the SIPp source code to make the whole match variable optional so that you don't need to jump through hoops like this. Charles Sajith T S [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/04/2008 09:28 AM To sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject [Sipp-users] Variable $5 is referenced 1 times! Hi, I'm trying to find the contact uri from a 200 OK response sent by the UAC, but sipp apparently isn't happy about the scenario file syntax. I keep getting this error: Variable $5 is referenced 1 times! is this correct? recv response=200 rtd=true rrs=true action ereg regexp=sip:.*;transport=.*SIP/2.0 search_in=hdr header=Contact: check_it=true assign_to=5,6 / /action /recv Thanks, Sajith. -- the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne. -- Chaucer. - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
