Re: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
FYI, I committed the Lucene patch that allows the *:* syntax today. It will be available in Solr when we do another lucene sync-up. -Yonik
Re: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
: It would would be really cool is if you could say something like... : : field:[low TO high]^0 other clauses XXX^0 : : ...and SolrIndexSearcher recognised that teh score contributions from the : range query and the XXX TermQuery weren't going to contribute to the : score, so it pulled the DocSets for them explicitly, and replaced their : spots in the orriginal query with ConstantScoreQueries containing their : DocSets ... that way they could be cached independently and reused. : Right now, if I have ranges that I don't want to affect the score, : but I would like to have cached, I should use Filter Queries, right? : (SolrParams.FQ) Right, that way they get cached independently, but that doesn't help the match all docs case where you *need* a large general query clause to be inlcuded in your main query to positively select things for you ... i was hypothosizing that some benefit might be gained in the long run by making the QueryParser a little smarter so hat it could (in essence) figure out the some FQs based on boost values, but still elave hem in the main query using Scorers that rely on the cached DocSet to decide what matches, instead of re-executing the work over and over for each variation. -Hoss
Re: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
Walter Underwood wrote: I was thinking something similar, maybe _solr:all. At Infoseek, we hardcoded url:http to match all docs. I suppose that different data would yield different responses but a space ( ) works on our data. the other Walter
Re: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
On 11/21/06 3:19 PM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : I've considered *:* but I haven't checked if the JavaCC grammar will : allow that through or if it would need to be modified. : : I looked into it quick, and it looks like the grammar may need to be : modified (i.e., one can't just override a method of QueryParser to do : this). we could add this to the function parser, so _val_:ALL could return a MatchAllDocsQuery ? I was thinking something similar, maybe _solr:all. At Infoseek, we hardcoded url:http to match all docs. wunder -- Walter Underwood Search Guru, Netflix
Re: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
On 11/21/06, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to do a match all docs query in solr? I mean is there something I can put in a solr URL that will get recognized by the SolrQueryParser as meaning a match all? No, but there should be. I've considered *:* but I haven't checked if the JavaCC grammar will allow that through or if it would need to be modified. -Yonik
Re: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
Thanks for the quick response. I thought about a range query on the ID, but was wondering what the implications were for a large range query. (e.g. Number of docs maxBooleanClauses). But this approach will work for me, as my test indicies are generally small. For a large data set, would it be faster to do that on a field with fewer values (but the same number of documents) e.g. type:[* TO *] where the type field has a small number of values. Or does that not matter? Thanks, Tom At 02:49 PM 11/21/2006, you wrote: : I mean is there something I can put in a solr URL that will get : recognized by the SolrQueryParser as meaning a match all? : : No, but there should be. if you use the uniqueKey feature, then you can do id:[* TO *] ... that acctually works on any field to find all docs that have a value, but on a uniqueKey field it by definition returns all docs since all docs have a uniequeKey. -Hoss
RE: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
I was thinking about existing SOLR Admin Interface... It already provides some kind of _solr:all, it can show at least number of documents and some other statistics. If we can do it XML-way, and make it more abstract and generic (facets, terms, etc.)... -Original Message- From: Walter Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 6:24 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr? On 11/21/06 3:19 PM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : I've considered *:* but I haven't checked if the JavaCC grammar will : allow that through or if it would need to be modified. : : I looked into it quick, and it looks like the grammar may need to be : modified (i.e., one can't just override a method of QueryParser to do : this). we could add this to the function parser, so _val_:ALL could return a MatchAllDocsQuery ? I was thinking something similar, maybe _solr:all. At Infoseek, we hardcoded url:http to match all docs. wunder -- Walter Underwood Search Guru, Netflix
RE: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
Is there a way to do a match all docs query in solr? Why do you need to perform full index search in order to find all indexed documents? We need additional XML-Admin-API, but it is different type of a 'query in solr' - no need for analyzer, tokenizer, etc.
Re: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
On 11/21/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I looked into it quick, and it looks like the grammar may need to be modified (i.e., one can't just override a method of QueryParser to do this). Done, but not yet committed in Lucene: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-723 -Yonik
