Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Zeke Yewdall
I believe that the quote from Ahmadinejad saying that he wanted to
wipe israel off the map was taken out of context.  He was talking
about how after World War II, the european powers arbitrarily drew
Israel on the map where it didn't exist before (and where other people
lived).   Does anyone have the full text of that speach?  I'll see if
I can find it.

Zeke



On 1/16/06, robert luis rabello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 jtcava wrote:


   Just this;The government of Israel does not espouse the total 
  eradication of the Iranian people.


 If their treatment of the Palestinians is any indication, I'm not
 confident that you are correct.  What a nation SAYS and what it
 actually DOES are two different things.


 While on the other hand Iran would probably use it's nukes to further
 the cause of Islam,mainly the destruction of the state of Israel.

 What evidence can you offer to support this contention?

 robert luis rabello
 The Edge of Justice
 Adventure for Your Mind
 http://www.newadventure.ca

 Ranger Supercharger Project Page
 http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread robert luis rabello
Zeke Yewdall wrote:


 While he is wrong in his insistence that the holocaust (or the
 millions of Jews murdered in Europe for the 1000 years before the
 Holocaust) didn't happen, I think he does have a point.  If europe
 felt so bad about the holocaust, why did they foist their problem on
 the middle east instead of dealing with it themselves? (and they
 haven't dealt with it -- anti-semitism is still widespread there) 

I don't think anyone can seriously doubt that the Hebrew people have 
a historical link to the land between the Mediterranean Sea and the 
Jordan River.  In some ways, the Europeanization of this issue began 
back when Pompey took over the region back in 60 BCE or so.  (Please 
correct me if I'm wrong here!)  After the Romans destroyed Jerusalem, 
the Jewish people HAD no homeland any more.  So, in a sense, it IS a 
European problem.

  This seems just as damning of the Europeans/americans as the Iranians
  -- just send the Jews off to somewhere else, and we'll pay for them to
  defend themselves so we can feel more moral about it, just so long as
  they leave our countries.  I'm not defending Iran here, but I don't
  think they are the only anti-semitic ones playing on this stage.  At
  least they're being honest.


I think you've brought up an excellent point.  The anti-Semitism to 
which you refer still exists all over the world.  It's convenient to 
think that we could move people we don't like somewhere else, just 
as the Hitlerites originally thought they could solve their problem 
by exporting Jews, Gypsies and Slavs to Madagascar.  The Palestinians, 
however, are also Semitic in origin, are they not?  So in a sense, 
isn't the Israeli government being racist in its actions, too?


robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Zeke Yewdall
Try this link.  Still not the full quote, but more.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4510922.stm

If European countries claim that they have killed Jews in World War
II... why don't they provide the Zionist regime with a piece of
Europe, .Germany and Austria can provide the... regime with two or
three provinces for this regime to establish itself, and the issue
will be resolved.

While he is wrong in his insistence that the holocaust (or the
millions of Jews murdered in Europe for the 1000 years before the
Holocaust) didn't happen, I think he does have a point.  If europe
felt so bad about the holocaust, why did they foist their problem on
the middle east instead of dealing with it themselves? (and they
haven't dealt with it -- anti-semitism is still widespread there) 
This seems just as damning of the Europeans/americans as the Iranians
-- just send the Jews off to somewhere else, and we'll pay for them to
defend themselves so we can feel more moral about it, just so long as
they leave our countries.  I'm not defending Iran here, but I don't
think they are the only anti-semitic ones playing on this stage.  At
least they're being honest.

On 1/17/06, Zeke Yewdall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I believe that the quote from Ahmadinejad saying that he wanted to
 wipe israel off the map was taken out of context.  He was talking
 about how after World War II, the european powers arbitrarily drew
 Israel on the map where it didn't exist before (and where other people
 lived).   Does anyone have the full text of that speach?  I'll see if
 I can find it.

 Zeke



 On 1/16/06, robert luis rabello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  jtcava wrote:
 
 
Just this;The government of Israel does not espouse the total 
   eradication of the Iranian people.
 
 
  If their treatment of the Palestinians is any indication, I'm not
  confident that you are correct.  What a nation SAYS and what it
  actually DOES are two different things.
 
 
  While on the other hand Iran would probably use it's nukes to further
  the cause of Islam,mainly the destruction of the state of Israel.
 
  What evidence can you offer to support this contention?
 
  robert luis rabello
  The Edge of Justice
  Adventure for Your Mind
  http://www.newadventure.ca
 
  Ranger Supercharger Project Page
  http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/
 
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Fuel heater question

2006-01-17 Thread fresheggs141

 -- Original message --
From: Kenji James Fuse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I have a 1988 F250, and it has a thermostatically-controlled fuel heater
 above the filter. Unfortunately, it is a very flimsy device, designed only
 for very rare use in sub -20F temperatures.
 
 I found this out when I considered hotwiring it so I could control it from
 the cab. But a Ford mechanic said this was sure to burn out the thin
 ceramic heating unit in no time. I don't know about a fancy 1999 model,
 but it's probably the same deal.
 
 Let me know if this is the case and if you find an adequate heater because
 I'm looking for the same. I'm almost ready to order a Veg-therm, but I've
 heard varying reports on it and it seems expensive for what it is.
 
 Kenji Fuse
 
 On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, magic wrote:
 
  Hello all,
 
 I have a 1999 F350 that I would like to run B100 in year round. (It's
  been a mild winter this year, but typically drops below 32F and
  occasionally under 20F.) I figured a fuel preheater would resolve any
  issues.  As I started to research the options, I also got a book on the
  F350. Looking at the fuel system in the book, there is a fuel heater
  just below the fuel filter (at the bottom of a fuel filter/water
  separator assembly).
 
 My question is would this all I need, or would I be better off still
  getting one of those fuel line preheater(s)?
 
 Many thanks,
 
 S
 
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 


I have an 88 f350, i put the fuel line from the tank to the filter inside of a 
coolant line. the block heater keeps everthing warm and after it starts the 
fuel in the line from the tank immeiately has warm coolant circulating around 
it. it was + 12f  yesterday and no problem. i did the same with my backhoe

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Joe Street
And it has been a sore point ever since.  I wonder what would have 
happened had a chunk of Germany been parceled off and given to the 
Jews.  Notwithstanding the historical link to the middle east and all 
that, there was a perfect excuse after Germany was conquered (as is 
always the case with conquered lands) for the victors to do as they see 
fit. Many of the Jews had been living there anyways. The Germans would 
have had no right to complain about it considering. Granted Europe is 
not without its history of territorial disputes but I have always 
wondered what the world would be like today if that choice had been made 
rather than just going in and forcibly taking control of the area that 
became Israel??

Where's that undo button Keith was looking for?

Joe

Zeke Yewdall wrote:

I believe that the quote from Ahmadinejad saying that he wanted to
wipe israel off the map was taken out of context.  He was talking
about how after World War II, the european powers arbitrarily drew
Israel on the map where it didn't exist before (and where other people
lived).   Does anyone have the full text of that speach?  I'll see if
I can find it.

Zeke

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Methanol Recovery?

2006-01-17 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Theo

Big-time, huh? :-)

Hello everyone, I am scaling up the size of my processing units to 
make about 300-400gallons of biodiesel a day. Right now I do not do 
any methanol recovery however at the larger scale it makes a lot of 
finical sense to get back the methanol. I have had a lot of trouble 
finding somewhat larger devices for recovering the methanol. I was 
wondering if anyone has experience in this field. The internet 
mentions methanol recovery but no sights really go into methanol 
recovery and biodiesl. Any help would be appreciated.  am open to 
either homemade designs or ones that can be purchased. Any useful 
links or links to pictures would be great. Also is it be to recover 
methanol form the glycerin, the biodiesel or both?

Preferably both, but you should do it at the right stages, and you 
have to make some decisions about how to handle the by-product. See:

Reclaiming excess methanol
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_make2.html#methreclaim

Best

Keith


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Help, my world is going nuke!

2006-01-17 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Bob

Hi Keith,
  Here in the clean and green where hydro, wind, thermal and
tidal energy options are coming out of our ears the nuclear crazies have
suddenly resurfaced. They look sane, they even wear suits and ties, carry
laptops and talk in full sentences. Among other things they've launched a
media campaign to rethink a New Zealand decision of many years ago to ban
the use of nuclear energy, including the admission of nuclear-powered ships
to our waters.

So I noticed. :-(

New Zealand's obviously after building a WMD, we'd better nuke them 
while there's still time, would that help? LOL!

What's mainly brought the nuke lobby staggering zombie-like back into 
current affairs is the quaint idea that nuclear power is green 
because it doesn't use fossil fuels, no carbon emissions so it won't 
wreck the climate. Todd shot all that down here a while ago.

They seek the construction of a nuclear power station, slap bang in an urban
area in an island nine by seven housing more than half our population. Their
bona fides are impeccable (top academics, energy consultants, corporate
heads etc) and their arguments smoothly plausible. They will win eventually
unless opposed with better and more persuasive argument.
Years ago I fought a five-year campaign against a nuclear powerstation in
South Africa and lost.

I think that young feller Peter Ravenscroft was involved in that too. 
I wasn't in Cape Town at that time.

That was before Chernobyl.

Early 70s.

The chickens of cost are
only now coming coming home to roost for the South African idiocy.

But they wanted their bomb, them and Israel and Taiwan.

Shortly
the aging plant near Cape Town - built on the coast of what was once
described as the fairest Cape in all the earth - will have to be mothballed.

Not just on the coast, on that particular stretch of coast at Melkbos 
yet, a special place. But I guess most of the Peninsula's a special 
place.

Apart from the fact that such a process will suck up billions of dollars
best used to eradicate poverty in a needy continent, it will when finally
decommissioned remain forever a target for terrorism and an excrescence on
the face of the planet.

That's also a special place.

During its lifetime it produced electricity at twice the cost of alternate
fuels. It also provided weapons material for the regime.

About par for their course, the true costs are hidden, the 
environmental and other costs externalised.

I'd hate to see it happen again, here in what Kipling called last,
loneliest and loveliest of lands. But I'm getting too long in the tooth now
to do the research though I'm happy to fire the bullets.
A disk crash wiped my archives,

Shudder! Sorry about that.

including some useful material you sent from
JTF. Canst please repeat the favour or perhaps point me to suitable sources?

Not easily. It wasn't from JTF, I believe it was onlist, but I didn't 
find it. I did a quick search and I found a lot of things, probably 
including what you're looking for, but no way to know. There's a 
large amount of good material on nuclear power in the list archives 
(including contributions from you), it's often been discussed. I 
think all the debunkings are there. If I wanted to research it that's 
where I'd start. But searching for nuclear won't do, there's too 
much material, you need better keywords. But I'm sure you have them.

If anyone else has anything to add in terms of solid, well-sourced and
dependable anti-nuclear energy background material I'd be most grateful.

Try the archives. There are people here who know a lot about nuclear 
power, if you need more specific info I'm sure they'd help.

Regards

Keith



Regards,
Bob.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Zeke Yewdall
  The Palestinians,
 however, are also Semitic in origin, are they not?

From a religious studies perspective, I believe Judaism, Christianity,
and Islam are all semetic religions, and originally stem from Judaism
which was founded (or evolved from previous multi-diety/agricultural
religions) in the middle east around 4,000 years ago.  Jesus was a Jew
who began Christianity, and Mohammad was a Christian who began Islam. 
As I understand it (and I'm not an expert by any means), the Jewish
holy book is very similar to the Old Testament, and the Koran takes
parts of both the old and new testament, and adds on to it.  The
Mormon religion is also an offshoot of Christianity, where Josesh
Smith added his own new book to the Bible.  It has just had fewer
years to diverge than Christianity from Judaism, or Islam from
Christianity.

A good read on this (fictionalization of middle eastern religious
history) is The Source, by James A. Michener

Z


On 1/17/06, robert luis rabello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Zeke Yewdall wrote:


  While he is wrong in his insistence that the holocaust (or the
  millions of Jews murdered in Europe for the 1000 years before the
  Holocaust) didn't happen, I think he does have a point.  If europe
  felt so bad about the holocaust, why did they foist their problem on
  the middle east instead of dealing with it themselves? (and they
  haven't dealt with it -- anti-semitism is still widespread there)

 I don't think anyone can seriously doubt that the Hebrew people have
 a historical link to the land between the Mediterranean Sea and the
 Jordan River.  In some ways, the Europeanization of this issue began
 back when Pompey took over the region back in 60 BCE or so.  (Please
 correct me if I'm wrong here!)  After the Romans destroyed Jerusalem,
 the Jewish people HAD no homeland any more.  So, in a sense, it IS a
 European problem.

   This seems just as damning of the Europeans/americans as the Iranians
   -- just send the Jews off to somewhere else, and we'll pay for them to
   defend themselves so we can feel more moral about it, just so long as
   they leave our countries.  I'm not defending Iran here, but I don't
   think they are the only anti-semitic ones playing on this stage.  At
   least they're being honest.


 I think you've brought up an excellent point.  The anti-Semitism to
 which you refer still exists all over the world.  It's convenient to
 think that we could move people we don't like somewhere else, just
 as the Hitlerites originally thought they could solve their problem
 by exporting Jews, Gypsies and Slavs to Madagascar.  The Palestinians,
 however, are also Semitic in origin, are they not?  So in a sense,
 isn't the Israeli government being racist in its actions, too?


 robert luis rabello
 The Edge of Justice
 Adventure for Your Mind
 http://www.newadventure.ca

 Ranger Supercharger Project Page
 http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Churchill didn't say it.........

2006-01-17 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Bob

Hi all,
  There I was, sipping nectar in paradise, minding my own 
business, wondering at the passing parade and thinking good of all 
mankind when suddenly - out of the blue, mind you,

But it's the best way! :-)

not in response to any dastardly deed of mine -

Far be it from me wantonly to bemire your nectar, but it wasn't just 
wanton, what with your substituting Churchill the Great for Churchill 
the Manipulator like that, I mean it went and woke me up, downright 
rude awakening I thought, here I was slumbering away peacefully as 
usual, so I thought I'd tumble you out of your hammock.

I was ambushed by Keith's acutely accurate pen; a reminder that we 
are indeed mortal and that our idols without exception, have feet of 
clay.

Right, so much for idols, that's just what I was saying. Trouble is 
they're treacherous, don't trust idols, especially not dead ones! Or 
don't have any idols in the first place.

A message for our times? LOL! What a
freak show, Barnum would have loved it.

Which particular freak show did you think I meant?

Anyway, now we have two versions of the hero of Omdurman, with and 
without Maxim guns and Egyptians to the rescue. I think I'll stick 
with the Maxim guns version.

Best

Keith




Vide the following mire flung at Winston.

(Snip)
Churchill though... Very embedded journalist he was during the Boer
War and previously. How about this awkward little gem? Churchill is
the very type of a corrupt journalist. There is not a worse
prostitute in politics. He himself has written that it's unimaginable
what can be done in war with the help of lies. - Adolf Hitler, to
General Erwin Rommel, 1942. A message for our times? LOL! What a
freak show, Barnum would have loved it.

With no intention of starting World War Three may I venture 
some comment. Firstly, in a remarkable number of battles, Winston 
was certainly deeply imbedded , both a combatant and a journo. Not 
for him the typewriter in the safe hotel or the regurgitation of 
Army PR as holy writ. In Afghanistan in the late 1880s he took 
command of a company of the Thirtyfirst Punjab Infantry during an 
action in the field when all the senior officers were killed. He 
knew only two words in Punjabi: maro (kill) and chalo (get on), two 
which he added an English word - Tallyho - and led the sepoys on his 
grey pony in a rout of the enemy.
In the Sudan two years later talked his way into a field commission 
as a Lieutenant with the 21st Lancers and took part with distinction 
in Britain's last great cavalry charge. His dispatches were so 
evenhanded (on that occasion he described his Arab foes: As brave 
men as ever walked the earth.) that he earned Kitchener's (head of 
the imperial forces of those days) undying enmity.
On escaping from a Boer prison during the South African War - and 
defying Kitchener's edict that no war correspondent could be at the 
front - he joined the South African Light Horse and played a major 
role during the appalling slaughter in the British defeat at Spion 
Kop, crawling around the battlefield from trench to 
trench, stiffening the courage of the lower ranks, arranging for 
rescue of wounded and minimising further casualties (Manchester, The 
Last Lion, Vol.1)
In short, he was a gung-ho Tory product of his time, doing what his 
patrician and public school upbringing had trained him to do.
Fast forward to the second year of WW2 when the Brits had a straight 
choice: Hitler or Churchill, fascist or tory (Republican, if you 
will): one was totalitarian, the other a democrat. (to paraphrase 
Winston himself: Democracy is the worst possible form of 
government, except for all the others. In the WW2 stoush 
between fascism and democracy people didn't have time for the 
politically correct nitpicking we relish in our generation - in fact 
they bought us the time we use for our current navel-gazing. There 
was a job to do. They needed somebody to do it.
The Brits chose Churchill (believe it or not, there was a rising 
groundswell of opinon among the upper classes that Britain should do 
an insider deal with Hitler). It took Churchill five days to root 
out the opinion-formers, face them down and get the majority of 
Brits singing from the same hymnbook. Then he went on public 
radio and told the average British yobbo that he promised him 
nothing but blood and toil, sweat and tears. He didn't mince words 
when it came to stiffening backbone. A year or so later the 
Americans were confronted with disaster in the Pacific. They too had 
their naysayers but they also had a patrician in the White 
House, Roosevelt a democrat who chose two other patricians, army 
brats Eisenhower and McArthur, to do the job.
Save me the agonizing about the inferior/superior qualities of 
civilisation exhibited by respective fighting forces throughout the 
ages. For every anti-Nazi quote I'm sure I could find a dozen in 
favour of Hitler and his minions, ditto for the Empire of the Rising 
Sun. In short we are 

Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread robert luis rabello
Zeke Yewdall wrote:


From a religious studies perspective, I believe Judaism, Christianity,
 and Islam are all semetic religions, and originally stem from Judaism
 which was founded (or evolved from previous multi-diety/agricultural
 religions) in the middle east around 4,000 years ago.

Perhaps it's more accurate to say that all three religions stemmed 
from the faith of a single man, a wanderer (Habiru, in one of the 
ancient languages) named Abram who believed in God.  His sons, Ishmael 
and Isaac, are reckoned as inheritors of the promises God made to 
Abram.  Islam traces its lineage of faith through Ishmael, the Jews 
and Christians through Isaac.

A tragedy in all of this discussion centers upon promises for 
prosperity that God made to Abram thousands of years ago.  These are 
used as a pretext to justify all manner of behaviors which God clearly 
does not approve (murder, theft, covetousness, etc.) by the hypocrisy 
of ignoring these clear commands for the sake of achieving political 
ends.  If God made the promises, he should be left to deliver on them 
WITHOUT our getting in the way.  (After all, if he is God, why would 
he need us to help him?)

So now we're talking about possible sanctions against Iran.  In an 
interview Karl Vick yesterday, NPR broadcast a contention that Iran's 
nuclear program was first discovered three years ago, but that it had 
been going on in secret for 18 years.  What I found interesting in 
this centers upon Karl Vick's admission that the Iranians, according 
to the provisions of treaties they've signed, have the full right to 
develop nuclear power.  Yet Mr. Vick, who is a reporter for The 
Washington Post, consistently blended the concepts of nuclear power 
with nuclear weapons, as if the two were completely interchangeable.

Canada has had nuclear power reactors for many years, but nobody 
worries that Canada is developing WMDs.  I don't hear the same kind of 
concern about nuclear weapons up here that Karl Vick casually mixed in 
to his discussion with Melissa Block on NPR.  One of the most 
frightening things about this kind of talk, is that once the 
non-thinking public begins to believe that nuclear power = nuclear 
weapons, we're easily maneuvered into thinking that the only solution 
to the potential threat lies in preventing nations like Iran (who are 
not good like us, after all) from building power plants at all costs.

Mr. Vick pointed out, however, that the Iranians see this as 
scientific apartheid, and that there is no level playing field 
among nations when it comes to nuclear power.  Then, he launched into 
a comparison of the Iranian president with Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez 
and leftist president Morales of Bolivia.  He might as well have 
said that the Iranians are in league with the devil, given the 
prevailing attitude of most Americans to those particular leaders. 
Even though at the very end of the interview he admitted that Iran is 
talking about power, NOT nuclear weapons, the damage had already been 
done.



http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5159746

I was a little disappointed that Melissa Block didn't take her 
colleague to task over this.  It seems like we're being duped again.


robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Paul Webber
The US hasn't been warmongering after Canada for the past 5
years. Most people cannot think of a good reason Canada would
want nuclear weapons. The reason that everyone is so quick to
believe that Iran is trying to get nuclear weapons is that the current
administration is very obviously antagonistic towards them. Most
people would try to get weapons themselves if they were in Iran's
position to protect themselves against the malevolence of the US.
Most people would probably not admit it because that would imply that
we are reaping what we sow.On 1/17/06, robert luis rabello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zeke Yewdall wrote:From a religious studies perspective, I believe Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are all semetic religions, and originally stem from Judaism which was founded (or evolved from previous multi-diety/agricultural
 religions) in the middle east around 4,000 years ago.Perhaps it's more accurate to say that all three religions stemmedfrom the faith of a single man, a wanderer (Habiru, in one of the
ancient languages) named Abram who believed in God.His sons, Ishmaeland Isaac, are reckoned as inheritors of the promises God made toAbram.Islam traces its lineage of faith through Ishmael, the Jewsand Christians through Isaac.
A tragedy in all of this discussion centers upon promises forprosperity that God made to Abram thousands of years ago.These areused as a pretext to justify all manner of behaviors which God clearly
does not approve (murder, theft, covetousness, etc.) by the hypocrisyof ignoring these clear commands for the sake of achieving politicalends.If God made the promises, he should be left to deliver on them
WITHOUT our getting in the way.(After all, if he is God, why wouldhe need us to help him?)So now we're talking about possible sanctions against Iran.In aninterview Karl Vick yesterday, NPR broadcast a contention that Iran's
nuclear program was first discovered three years ago, but that it hadbeen going on in secret for 18 years.What I found interesting inthis centers upon Karl Vick's admission that the Iranians, accordingto the provisions of treaties they've signed, have the full right to
develop nuclear power.Yet Mr. Vick, who is a reporter for TheWashington Post, consistently blended the concepts of nuclear powerwith nuclear weapons, as if the two were completely interchangeable.Canada has had nuclear power reactors for many years, but nobody
worries that Canada is developing WMDs.I don't hear the same kind ofconcern about nuclear weapons up here that Karl Vick casually mixed into his discussion with Melissa Block on NPR.One of the mostfrightening things about this kind of talk, is that once the
non-thinking public begins to believe that nuclear power = nuclearweapons, we're easily maneuvered into thinking that the only solutionto the potential threat lies in preventing nations like Iran (who arenot good like us, after all) from building power plants at all costs.
Mr. Vick pointed out, however, that the Iranians see this asscientific apartheid, and that there is no level playing fieldamong nations when it comes to nuclear power.Then, he launched into
a comparison of the Iranian president with Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavezand leftist president Morales of Bolivia.He might as well havesaid that the Iranians are in league with the devil, given the
prevailing attitude of most Americans to those particular leaders.Even though at the very end of the interview he admitted that Iran istalking about power, NOT nuclear weapons, the damage had already beendone.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5159746I was a little disappointed that Melissa Block didn't take her
colleague to task over this.It seems like we're being duped again.robert luis rabelloThe Edge of JusticeAdventure for Your Mindhttp://www.newadventure.ca
Ranger Supercharger Project Pagehttp://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/___Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/-- Paul Webber[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Methanol Recovery?

2006-01-17 Thread Greg Ocnos


Could you put it through a still like you were going to make your own
ethanol? I assume that the biofuel and glycerin are higher boiling
points and the methanol will decanter off.

Greg O. from MA  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:04 PM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Methanol Recovery?

Hi Theo

Big-time, huh? :-)

Hello everyone, I am scaling up the size of my processing units to 
make about 300-400gallons of biodiesel a day. Right now I do not do 
any methanol recovery however at the larger scale it makes a lot of 
finical sense to get back the methanol. I have had a lot of trouble 
finding somewhat larger devices for recovering the methanol. I was 
wondering if anyone has experience in this field. The internet 
mentions methanol recovery but no sights really go into methanol 
recovery and biodiesl. Any help would be appreciated.  am open to 
either homemade designs or ones that can be purchased. Any useful 
links or links to pictures would be great. Also is it be to recover 
methanol form the glycerin, the biodiesel or both?

Preferably both, but you should do it at the right stages, and you 
have to make some decisions about how to handle the by-product. See:

Reclaiming excess methanol
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_make2.html#methreclaim

Best

Keith


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.or
g

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread robert luis rabello
Paul Webber wrote:

 The US hasn't been warmongering after Canada for the past 5 years.  Most 
 people cannot think of a good reason Canada would want nuclear weapons.  
 The reason that everyone is so quick to believe that Iran is trying to 
 get nuclear weapons is that the current administration is very obviously 
 antagonistic towards them.  Most people would try to get weapons 
 themselves if they were in Iran's position to protect themselves against 
 the malevolence of the US.  Most people would probably not admit it 
 because that would imply that we are reaping what we sow.

Well, if the Bloc Quebecois ever won a majority in Parliament and 
seriously made an effort to separate from Canada, you might see things 
change on the south side of the border.  I can hear the headlines already:

French Vote to Dismantle Democracy in Canada.

Hostile French Canadian Government Opposes US Foreign Policy.

Alberta Energy Minister Warns Tar Sands Not for Sale.

Candu Reactor Suspected of Plutonium Production.

US Troops Rescue Canada in Operation Northern Freedom.

We Americans would have to come up here and straighten things out, 
putting those Francophones back into their place, and securing all of 
that energy that Alberta and British Columbia don't seem to know what 
to do with.  Then, we could put an end to that silly softwood lumber 
dispute once and for all.  You Canadians would welcome us with open 
arms, after all . . .  wouldn't you???

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Keith Addison
And it has been a sore point ever since.  I wonder what would have
happened had a chunk of Germany been parceled off and given to the
Jews.  Notwithstanding the historical link to the middle east and all
that, there was a perfect excuse after Germany was conquered (as is
always the case with conquered lands) for the victors to do as they see
fit. Many of the Jews had been living there anyways. The Germans would
have had no right to complain about it considering. Granted Europe is
not without its history of territorial disputes but I have always
wondered what the world would be like today if that choice had been made
rather than just going in and forcibly taking control of the area that
became Israel??

Quite a lot of Gulf Arabs told me something similar in the late 70s 
when I was working on Gulf issues, only they said, Why didn't they 
put it in Australia?

Mike posted a Churchill piece about Zionism versus Bolshevism, which 
of course leads back to the Balfour Declaration. (Lots about all this 
in the list archives.)

There's also this:

http://ajedrez_democratico.tripod.com/balfour_declaration.htm
The Balfour Declaration
A history of perfidy and betrayal in the Mideast gives insight into 
the motivations behind the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
By Dr. Robert John

It's a nest of snakes, this subject, be warned. Not saying don't do 
it, just don't be too surprised if it starts getting venomous, with 
facts and integrity an early casualty.

Where's that undo button Keith was looking for?

C'mon Joe, if you can make a titration kit I'm sure you can make an 
Undo button, it's the same kind of black magic isn't it?

Joe

Zeke Yewdall wrote:

 I believe that the quote from Ahmadinejad saying that he wanted to
 wipe israel off the map was taken out of context.  He was talking
 about how after World War II, the european powers arbitrarily drew
 Israel on the map where it didn't exist before (and where other people
 lived).

But it wasn't after World War II, it was after World War I, or during 
World War 1.

Does anyone have the full text of that speach?  I'll see if
 I can find it.

Nice point Zeke, I'm glad you found part of it at least.

Try this link.  Still not the full quote, but more.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4510922.stm

If European countries claim that they have killed Jews in World War
II... why don't they provide the Zionist regime with a piece of
Europe, .Germany and Austria can provide the... regime with two or
three provinces for this regime to establish itself, and the issue
will be resolved.

While he is wrong in his insistence that the holocaust (or the
millions of Jews murdered in Europe for the 1000 years before the
Holocaust) didn't happen, I think he does have a point.  If europe
felt so bad about the holocaust, why did they foist their problem on
the middle east instead of dealing with it themselves? (and they
haven't dealt with it -- anti-semitism is still widespread there)
This seems just as damning of the Europeans/americans as the Iranians
-- just send the Jews off to somewhere else, and we'll pay for them to
defend themselves so we can feel more moral about it, just so long as
they leave our countries.  I'm not defending Iran here, but I don't
think they are the only anti-semitic ones playing on this stage.  At
least they're being honest.

By the way, surveys have found that anti-Semitism in Europe has 
decreased, but anti-Zionism has increased. Just to distinguish 
between the two. It's not clear that the Iranians are anti-Semitic, 
but they're certainly anti-Zionist. But then who in the Middle East 
isn't anti-Zionist, outside Israel? More than a few Israeli Jews are 
also anti-Zionist, more than a few American Jews too.

Best

Keith



 Zeke


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Methanol Recovery?

2006-01-17 Thread Keith Addison
HI MY NAME IS MIKE AND I HAVE A METHANOL PROBLEM.

HI MIKE!

I first began using methanol just on the weekends.  A few bottles of dry
gas here and there, just enought to make myself feel better about my
fuel usage.  Then it got to be too expensive to buy methanol in little
bottles and I began to buy boxes of HEET.  I drove all over town just to
save a few cents on
a case.  Soon, as I began to feel better and better, and my VW ran
better and better.  I am ashamed to say I even got my friends involved.
We snuck around behind seamy restaurants, liberating oil. We pretended
to have drain problems so we could buy lye.  We began to just want to be
by ourselves, cooking our little batches.  We egged each other on.  Soon
we had quite a litle crowd.  Little bottles didn't cut it anymore. One
of my buddies knew a guy who could get 5 gallon jugs.  Suddenly life
was good again.  We built bigger and better works.  We got brazen.  We
drove around stinking of oil - Thai food, French Fries and peanut oil.
We started to meet the higher ups in the methanol trade.  We did a deal
and scored 55 gallons.  We had quite a racket going.  We though we were
untouchable.

Then it all came crashing down.  There was an intervention.  Nice white
men is suits explained over and over how methanol leads to the
destruction of the US economy.  Good people at ExxonMobil, Shell and
Sunoco would be out of work.  They explained how we were a major factor
in the collapse of the SUV industry, and the dire condition of GM and
Ford.  We felt bad.

Today I am a happy member of society.  I have an SUV and heat my house
with petroleum.  I drive work from the suburbs.

Let my story be a warning to you all:  One little bottel of methanol can
lead to not just your downfall, but the wholesale collapse of all we
hold dear.
The American way of life is a blessed one.  Be strong against the forces
of darkness that seek to mislead you.  Do not follow Keith.  He is a
false prophet.
He lives on a mountain in Japan, preaching self-sufficiency.  Little do
most people know he is really the head of an evil cartel that has huge
holdings in methanol, lye and vegetable oil.  You have been warned!  Oh,
he has also cornered the market in Phenopthalein.

It's not a false profit, how can you say such a thing? It's true that 
we did try to corner the market in that stuff but it didn't work 
because we couldn't spell it right either.

Please make sure you get your facts straight next time before you 
start accusing innocent people of living on mountains and so on. And 
I don't preach self-sufficiency, all I said was I vunt to be alone. 
But thanks for asking people not to follow me up here at least.

Be Strong!

Hmph.

Best

Keith


-Mike


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Joe Street


Paul Webber wrote:

 The US hasn't been warmongering after Canada for the past 5 years.

And it's a damn good thing too.  Believe me none of us want to have to 
go down there AGAIN and kick their butts like we did the last four times 
they got unruly and we wouldn't want to be forced to burn down their 
parliament buildings AGAIN either! Let's hope it doesn't come to that.

 Most people cannot think of a good reason Canada would want nuclear 
 weapons. 

Well we do have a very ferocious rodent we call the turbo beaver. This 
is the nefarious creature that appears on the 5 cent peice and legend 
has it that they have a leader of enormous proportions that resides in 
the vicinity of Sudbury.  Dynamite is only resonably effective in 
dealing with the dams these buggers build seemingly overnight.  It would 
be nice to have something a tad stronger you know.

Joe


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Fred Finch
hehe, a beaver of mass destruction!!LOL!fredOn 1/17/06, Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:Paul Webber wrote: The US hasn't been warmongering after Canada for the past 5 years.
And it's a damn good thing too.Believe me none of us want to have togo down there AGAIN and kick their butts like we did the last four timesthey got unruly and we wouldn't want to be forced to burn down their
parliament buildings AGAIN either! Let's hope it doesn't come to that. Most people cannot think of a good reason Canada would want nuclear weapons.Well we do have a very ferocious rodent we call the turbo beaver. This
is the nefarious creature that appears on the 5 cent peice and legendhas it that they have a leader of enormous proportions that resides inthe vicinity of Sudbury.Dynamite is only resonably effective indealing with the dams these buggers build seemingly overnight.It would
be nice to have something a tad stronger you know.Joe___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Joe Street




You KNOW her?

Fred Finch wrote:
hehe, a beaver of mass destruction!!
  
LOL!
  
fred
  
  On 1/17/06, Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:
  

Paul Webber wrote:

 The US hasn't been warmongering after Canada for the past 5 years.


And it's a damn good thing too.Believe me none of us want to have to
go down there AGAIN and kick their butts like we did the last four times
they got unruly and we wouldn't want to be forced to burn down their

parliament buildings AGAIN either! Let's hope it doesn't come to that.

 Most people cannot think of a good reason Canada would want nuclear
 weapons.

Well we do have a very ferocious rodent we call the turbo beaver. This

is the nefarious creature that appears on the 5 cent peice and legend
has it that they have a leader of enormous proportions that resides in
the vicinity of Sudbury.Dynamite is only resonably effective in
dealing with the dams these buggers build seemingly overnight.It
would

be nice to have something a tad stronger you know.

Joe


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


  
  
  
  

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Joe Street


robert luis rabello wrote:

   We Americans would have to come up here and straighten things out, 
putting those Francophones back into their place, and securing all of 
that energy snip
  

Don't forget about the softwood! Wouldn't do to forgo pilfering that 
too!  And the water. Oh and the salmon or is that all gone now? Ah did I 
forget anything oh yeah the comedians and country singers, hockey stars, 
- well the whole game actually, let's see what elseoh yeah how could 
I forget the aeronautical engineers, the doctors, the nurses, the 
programmers and uh did I mention the cobalt and the uranium well I guess 
that goes with the oil and stuff right?

I'm warning you operation beaver fever is well under way and these 
killer forest rats are spin hardened and laugh at the very idea of your 
F4 wild weasles. Be afraid. Be verrry affraid.

J


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Fritz Friesinger



Hey Robert,
thats exactly what i am telling my Quebecer Freinds 
since 20 Jears
Fritz from Quebec

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  robert luis rabello 
  
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:47 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War 
  against Iran
  Paul Webber wrote: The US hasn't been warmongering 
  after Canada for the past 5 years. Most  people cannot think of 
  a good reason Canada would want nuclear weapons.  The reason 
  that everyone is so quick to believe that Iran is trying to  get 
  nuclear weapons is that the current administration is very obviously  
  antagonistic towards them. Most people would try to get weapons  
  themselves if they were in Iran's position to protect themselves against 
   the malevolence of the US. Most people would probably not admit 
  it  because that would imply that we are reaping what we 
  sow.Well, if the Bloc Quebecois ever won a majority in Parliament and 
  seriously made an effort to separate from Canada, you might see things 
  change on the south side of the border. I can hear the headlines 
  already:"French Vote to Dismantle Democracy in 
  Canada.""Hostile French Canadian Government Opposes US Foreign 
  Policy.""Alberta Energy Minister Warns Tar Sands Not for 
  Sale.""Candu Reactor Suspected of Plutonium Production.""US 
  Troops Rescue Canada in Operation Northern Freedom."We Americans would 
  have to come up here and straighten things out, putting those Francophones 
  back into their place, and securing all of that energy that Alberta and 
  British Columbia don't seem to know what to do with. Then, we could 
  put an end to that silly softwood lumber dispute once and for all. 
  You Canadians would welcome us with open arms, after all . . . 
  wouldn't you???robert luis rabello"The Edge of 
  Justice"Adventure for Your Mindhttp://www.newadventure.caRanger 
  Supercharger Project Pagehttp://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/___Biofuel 
  mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch 
  the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Methanol Recovery? Amazing !!

2006-01-17 Thread Bioclaire Nederland
Amazing Keith, that you put any time in stupid articles like this man wrote.
How can you keep your patients ?

Greetings,
Pieter.

- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Methanol Recovery?


 HI MY NAME IS MIKE AND I HAVE A METHANOL PROBLEM.
 
 HI MIKE!
 
 I first began using methanol just on the weekends.  A few bottles of dry
 gas here and there, just enought to make myself feel better about my
 fuel usage.  Then it got to be too expensive to buy methanol in little
 bottles and I began to buy boxes of HEET.  I drove all over town just to
 save a few cents on
 a case.  Soon, as I began to feel better and better, and my VW ran
 better and better.  I am ashamed to say I even got my friends involved.
 We snuck around behind seamy restaurants, liberating oil. We pretended
 to have drain problems so we could buy lye.  We began to just want to be
 by ourselves, cooking our little batches.  We egged each other on.  Soon
 we had quite a litle crowd.  Little bottles didn't cut it anymore. One
 of my buddies knew a guy who could get 5 gallon jugs.  Suddenly life
 was good again.  We built bigger and better works.  We got brazen.  We
 drove around stinking of oil - Thai food, French Fries and peanut oil.
 We started to meet the higher ups in the methanol trade.  We did a deal
 and scored 55 gallons.  We had quite a racket going.  We though we were
 untouchable.
 
 Then it all came crashing down.  There was an intervention.  Nice white
 men is suits explained over and over how methanol leads to the
 destruction of the US economy.  Good people at ExxonMobil, Shell and
 Sunoco would be out of work.  They explained how we were a major factor
 in the collapse of the SUV industry, and the dire condition of GM and
 Ford.  We felt bad.
 
 Today I am a happy member of society.  I have an SUV and heat my house
 with petroleum.  I drive work from the suburbs.
 
 Let my story be a warning to you all:  One little bottel of methanol can
 lead to not just your downfall, but the wholesale collapse of all we
 hold dear.
 The American way of life is a blessed one.  Be strong against the forces
 of darkness that seek to mislead you.  Do not follow Keith.  He is a
 false prophet.
 He lives on a mountain in Japan, preaching self-sufficiency.  Little do
 most people know he is really the head of an evil cartel that has huge
 holdings in methanol, lye and vegetable oil.  You have been warned!  Oh,
 he has also cornered the market in Phenopthalein.

 It's not a false profit, how can you say such a thing? It's true that
 we did try to corner the market in that stuff but it didn't work
 because we couldn't spell it right either.

 Please make sure you get your facts straight next time before you
 start accusing innocent people of living on mountains and so on. And
 I don't preach self-sufficiency, all I said was I vunt to be alone.
 But thanks for asking people not to follow me up here at least.

 Be Strong!

 Hmph.

 Best

 Keith


 -Mike


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread Fred Finch
More than you know!!!On 1/17/06, Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



  
  


You KNOW her?

Fred Finch wrote:
hehe, a beaver of mass destruction!!
  
LOL!
  
fred
  
  On 1/17/06, Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:
  

Paul Webber wrote:

 The US hasn't been warmongering after Canada for the past 5 years.


And it's a damn good thing too.Believe me none of us want to have to
go down there AGAIN and kick their butts like we did the last four times
they got unruly and we wouldn't want to be forced to burn down their

parliament buildings AGAIN either! Let's hope it doesn't come to that.

 Most people cannot think of a good reason Canada would want nuclear
 weapons.

Well we do have a very ferocious rodent we call the turbo beaver. This

is the nefarious creature that appears on the 5 cent peice and legend
has it that they have a leader of enormous proportions that resides in
the vicinity of Sudbury.Dynamite is only resonably effective in
dealing with the dams these buggers build seemingly overnight.It
would

be nice to have something a tad stronger you know.

Joe


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


  
  
  
  
___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  




___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-17 Thread robert luis rabello
Fritz Friesinger wrote:

 Hey Robert,
 thats exactly what i am telling my Quebecer Freinds since 20 Jears
 Fritz from Quebec

I've never met a Quebecer I didn't like!  Long ago, I actually 
planned to write a book about a US invasion of Canada.  I thought a 
Hispanic soldier from the LA Barrio might meet up with a Francophone 
resistance fighter and fall in love.  He speaks Spanish, she speaks 
French.  She's Roman Catholic, so is he.  They both live in within a 
sea of Anglophones.  Silly idea, really . . .

Or is it?

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] quick video, thought it was interesting

2006-01-17 Thread Evergreen Solutions
Just ran across this, thought it was interesting.http://www.dumpalink.com/media/1137331521/Never_Charge_Your_Phone_Again

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Dewatering with vacuum.

2006-01-17 Thread Jacko55555




Back to Science class!
Vacuum- I have worked very little with vacuum. While in the Navy, I was 
learning OJT a little about refrigeration. At that time I was taught inches of 
Hg. and 30"Hg is the max but extremely hard or impossible to achieve.

5 deg. C = 6.5mm Hg  .25"Hg55 deg. C = appr. 110 mm 
Hg4.33"Hg

If H2O is 18 and Hg is 200.59, Hg is 11.14 time heavier

 .25" Hg = 2.785 " water
4.33" Hg = 48.24 " water

Where does micron come in?

Dave Miller spoke of an old scientific pump you had that went to 002mm Hg. 
Scientific pump suggests to a very good pump, but .002 sounds like very little 
vacuum. (unless zero is not the same place). He also mentioned I should look for 
a 50? I am sure this will become quite clear, but now, it's not sinking 
in.

Thanks John



  - Original Message - 
  From: Joe Street 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:00 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Dewatering with 
  vacuum.
  David Miller wrote:SnipSomebody had 
  the vapor pressure tables for water earlier in this thread, maybe he 
  could look up the pressure for 55 and 5 degrees C.--- 
  David 5 deg. C = 6.5mm Hg55 deg. C = 
  appr. 110 mm HgIt means that water does not have to be removed from 
  the trap (as was stated ) since water at 5 deg.C has a vapour pressure low 
  enogh as not to interfere with drying the fuel. It will never be perfectly 
  dry and even if you could, it would adsorb water from the air when you 
  take it out of the vacuum chamber. In practical terms just run cold 
  water through your condenser and when the vacuum in the reactor gets to 
  27" Hg or better you are done! I do it all the time. It works 
  well. I reheat the reactor during washing and after draining the last wash 
  the vacuum is started. An hour later the fuel is dry, crystal clear 
  and ready to 
  use.Joe___Biofuel 
  mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to Forever:MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "journeytoforever.org" claiming to be http://journeytoforeverorg/biofuel.htmlSearch 
  the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

2006-01-17 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Jan and all

Hello Golan and all,
from experience I can tell that the methanol test as described on 
the JtF homepage rather well corresponds to the result you will have 
from the test according to the EN 14214 regarding the ester content.

I agree, see below.

Just to be clear, Europe's EN 14214 standard specifies ester content 
at min. 96.5%, the French standard is the same, Italy and Sweden 
specify min. 98%, the US ASTM D-6751 standard doesn't specify ester 
content. EN 14214 is probably the de facto basic world standard.

However, if the methanol test shows e.g. 1 ml (4%) of undissolved 
oil in the measuring glass, you can expect an ester content of 
92-94% according to the EN norm. In order to meet the norm with an 
ester content of min 96,5%, the methanol test will have to show no 
undissolved oil at all.

I tried the methanol test several times and didn't get any result. So 
I tried it with some other fuel, some biodiesel made by a newbie 
brewer before we helped him to improve it, and some fuel from 
commercial producers here in Japan, and then I got results, very 
clear! Just as Jan described it in his original message.

Since then we've been working with a university lab that's tested our 
biodiesel with their gaskro (GC), using samples from standard 
production batches, not test-batch samples, just the usual stuff we 
make all the time, and the results show FAME content of 98.5%. Which 
is why we didn't get any result with the methanol test. I've also 
seen other lab tests which tend to confirm the results I got with the 
commercial fuel methanol tests.

Joe asked:

  So my question once again is who else uses this test and how is it
  going for you?  Does anyone get a perfect result (no fallout) from
  this test?  And finally should I be concerned by a couple of percent
  contamination in my fuel?

I think it's a very useful test. Should you be concerned, well, it's 
up to you. These might help, if you haven't already seen them:

The Fuel Injection Equipment (FIE) Manufacturers (Delphi, Stanadyne, 
Denso, Bosch) on biodiesel quality:
Summary -- html
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_FIEM.html
Full document -- Acrobat file, 104kb
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/FIEM.pdf

Determining the Influence of Contaminants on Biodiesel Properties, 
Jon H. Van Gerpen et al., Iowa State University, July 31, 1996 -- 
12,000-word report on contaminants and their effects. Acrobat file, 
2.1Mb
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/bdgerpen96.pdf

Best

Keith



pH measurements are difficult and the right conclusions from these 
measurements can be even harder to draw.
But, a neutral BD can have a pH value of anything between 4,5 -7, 
depending upon which other substances are present in the BD. It is 
also important to know that the pH scale is logarithmic when judging 
the results of the measurements.
If a WVO has a pH value above 7, it means that there are alkaline 
compounds present, probably  tenside remains. The way of succeeding 
with biodiesel production goes through an accurate raw material 
control, adjusting the recipe and process details according to that.
Good luck to you !
Jan Warnqvist
AGERATEC AB

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89
+46 70 499 38 45

- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Golan Shmuel
To: mailto:Biofuel@sustainablelists.orgBiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Jan's Methanol test

hi joe
iuse the test and it still gives me hadeake .
at list half of the times are not as it should be
im at the begining of the way and it give me direction.
i just put abigger pump and it already looking better
i alsow parchesed a PH tester and i start to take test from old BD 
sampels (unwashed)resault 12.2-13.3 how doese that sound?
tested as well somewvo i got 8.4-8.5 i thought it should be acid? 
have u got any idea
all the best
golan



On 13/01/06, JJJN mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Joe,
I use every test on JtF to test my Bio and also the the Hanna
Instruments test for Glycol. I do this every single batch.  I have never
had any fallout in Jans test to date.(Knock Knock Knock on wood) ( I
measure it out precisely ) I have graduated to the base/base method and
have had absolutely great results. That said I got into a washing awhile
back that was not as good as I like so I investigated and found that I
am dealing with FFA's that are higher than I want.  I am moving to the
acid/base learning phase for that.  I did also learn that if I pour the
WVO that is liquid and on top at 28 deg F into a bucket and process the
stuff that gets clumpy (on bottom)  I greatly reduce the FFA's in the
oil. (14% or so lower) compairitably (tests of each done side by side
same temp same everything  except oil and very precise). So in the
future winter freeze cycles I will cut out the dark top stuff and save
for Acid processing. I have since adopted this and my bio stands up 

Re: [Biofuel] Methanol Recovery? Amazing !!

2006-01-17 Thread lres1
For all the different races creeds right down to individual family
structures the thought patterns and the associated thought denominators are
infinite. Common sense is not.

For Keith to take the time to respond to the mail lets me know that 1/ he is
alive and well on the hill/mountain and 2/ is not discriminatory but has a
site open to all. For a whole to work as one it needs to understand all the
globally diverse denominators and thus the responses to address them.

Who knows where Mike or Keith will finish up or the influences/legacies they
leave behind.

Twould appear that nothing is immortal not even the earth we tread under
foot.
Doug Handisides

- Original Message - 
From: Bioclaire Nederland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Methanol Recovery? Amazing !!


 ***
 No virus was detected in the attachment no filename

 Your mail has been scanned by InterScan.
 ***-***


 Amazing Keith, that you put any time in stupid articles like this man
wrote.
 How can you keep your patients ?

 Greetings,
 Pieter.

 - Original Message -
 From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:13 PM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Methanol Recovery?


  HI MY NAME IS MIKE AND I HAVE A METHANOL PROBLEM.
  
  HI MIKE!
  
  I first began using methanol just on the weekends.  A few bottles of
dry
  gas here and there, just enought to make myself feel better about my
  fuel usage.  Then it got to be too expensive to buy methanol in little
  bottles and I began to buy boxes of HEET.  I drove all over town just
to
  save a few cents on
  a case.  Soon, as I began to feel better and better, and my VW ran
  better and better.  I am ashamed to say I even got my friends involved.
  We snuck around behind seamy restaurants, liberating oil. We pretended
  to have drain problems so we could buy lye.  We began to just want to
be
  by ourselves, cooking our little batches.  We egged each other on.
Soon
  we had quite a litle crowd.  Little bottles didn't cut it anymore. One
  of my buddies knew a guy who could get 5 gallon jugs.  Suddenly life
  was good again.  We built bigger and better works.  We got brazen.
We
  drove around stinking of oil - Thai food, French Fries and peanut oil.
  We started to meet the higher ups in the methanol trade.  We did a deal
  and scored 55 gallons.  We had quite a racket going.  We though we were
  untouchable.
  
  Then it all came crashing down.  There was an intervention.  Nice white
  men is suits explained over and over how methanol leads to the
  destruction of the US economy.  Good people at ExxonMobil, Shell and
  Sunoco would be out of work.  They explained how we were a major factor
  in the collapse of the SUV industry, and the dire condition of GM and
  Ford.  We felt bad.
  
  Today I am a happy member of society.  I have an SUV and heat my house
  with petroleum.  I drive work from the suburbs.
  
  Let my story be a warning to you all:  One little bottel of methanol
can
  lead to not just your downfall, but the wholesale collapse of all we
  hold dear.
  The American way of life is a blessed one.  Be strong against the
forces
  of darkness that seek to mislead you.  Do not follow Keith.  He is a
  false prophet.
  He lives on a mountain in Japan, preaching self-sufficiency.  Little do
  most people know he is really the head of an evil cartel that has huge
  holdings in methanol, lye and vegetable oil.  You have been warned!
Oh,
  he has also cornered the market in Phenopthalein.
 
  It's not a false profit, how can you say such a thing? It's true that
  we did try to corner the market in that stuff but it didn't work
  because we couldn't spell it right either.
 
  Please make sure you get your facts straight next time before you
  start accusing innocent people of living on mountains and so on. And
  I don't preach self-sufficiency, all I said was I vunt to be alone.
  But thanks for asking people not to follow me up here at least.
 
  Be Strong!
 
  Hmph.
 
  Best
 
  Keith
 
 
  -Mike
 
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/