Re: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 Real Simple magazine
In a message dated 9/25/2004 3:29:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Personally, I believe is it unconscionable for any follower of Christ in America to NOT vote for President Bushs re-election. The only alternative, not a third party candidate, but Kerry. This actually kind of bothers me a little. I will not vote for Kerry for a number of reasons. But my vote -- ok, it is for Bush --- is a secular consideration. I certainly do not believe that the Republican Party is God's party. I actually do not consider Kerry to be "evil." But what are his core values? No one really knows. And with 40 days remaining to election, he has no intentions of letting us know what those values are. So, he does not get my vote. Abortion? No biggie -- yes, I said "no biggie." If the churched would get off its collective butt, abortions would be a tenth of what they are today. We, the churched, want an end to abortion on demand but we do not want to care for the 1.3 million newborns as a result. Its the old "be thou warmed and filled" mentality. John (this is why I am not a pastor any more) Smithson
Re: [TruthTalk] Judgment?
In a message dated 9/25/2004 6:24:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 15 "Beware of th[ose who].. (12) inwardly are (13) ravenous wolves. 16 "You will (14) know them by their [works]: || 22 "(19) Many will say to Me on (20) that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not .. in Your name [perform] many miracles?' 23 "I will declare to them, 'I never knew you;..' An absolutely wonder proof-text answer. I believe in the truth of this scripture. But this does not address my concerns listed below. Not even close and I can think of several scriptures that do. John (From a pervious post) And then we have those who do not and will never "know better." They are those stunted by unenlightened teaching, superstitions, genuine deftness (for whatever reason) to the gospel message (i.e. the pagan Gentile in Romans, chapter two and the Buddhist in some unnamed island off the coast of India) , diet deficiencies, genetics related stupidity, cultural confusion (i.e. the American Indian and the Crenshaw Ave gang member), emotional instabilities and the very poor living examples of those who do claim the name of our Lord (the adulterous Teacher, the perverted youth counselor, the thief in sheep's clothing, the Christen couch potato who knows better). John
Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
In a message dated 9/25/2004 6:55:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling for a mandatory evacuation of low-lying areas, mobile homes, and manufactured homes. This has been an interesting six weeks with four storms. I don't understand why Michael doesn't simply pray these storms into Russia. If we have power over the weather, why not that? Serious as a heart attack, brother John
Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
DAVEH: Hm againWould you consider Jesus to have been cultish, if that is the right term? Or perhaps a better question, would he have been considered to have been the founder (or focal point) of a cult? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 9/25/2004 12:54:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Hm.Can Jesus be classified as either a liberal or conservative? By political definition, Jesus was a liberal (I hate to admit this). And most "conservatives"n our day would have defended the status quo of the 1st century. John -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
In a message dated 9/25/2004 11:14:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Hm againWould you consider Jesus to have been cultish, if that is the right term? Or perhaps a better question, would he have been considered to have been the founder (or focal point) of a cult? Not at all. His gospel, given full revelation in the writings of Paul and others, simply mirrors the "hidden: agenda of the Father from the beginning of time. An example of this would be David's comments in Ps 51, telling all those who would read that psalm that God cares more for true worship (brokenness and contribtion than prescribed acts of worship [i.e. sacrifices], even if they were presecibed by Him. The message has always been there -- it got lost in man's evolving effort at solving his own problems in his own way. IMO a brother, John
[TruthTalk] [Fwd: [Infinite Supply] Sunday, September 26, 2004]
Thought that this one was too good not to share. It makes us ignorant uneducated people feel a little less ignorant. Terry I N F I N I T E S U P P L Y Sunday, September 26, 2004 - Hi Terry, Today's meditation is taken from: THE HIDDEN WISDOM by Chip Brogden http://www.watchman.net/articles/wisdom.html :: If any man among you seems to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God (I Corinthians 3:18,19). Man places a high value on education, instruction, learning, and knowledge. Perhaps these things have their place, but in spiritual matters they mean nothing. Indeed, when the Spirit of the Lord begins to give us the Hidden Wisdom, we find it is contrary to the wisdom of this world. In order to see as He sees we must be willing to embrace the unknown and the unfamiliar. Paul warns that in the last days perilous times will come. He tells us of a sort of people who are ever learning, and never able to come to the full-knowledge (epignosis) of Truth (II Timothy 3:7). There is no lack of instruction and learning, no lack of Bible teachers and Bible studies, but there is a lack of experiential Truth. That is, people have truth as a thing instead of Truth as a Man. This demonstrates that an accumulation of knowledge does not guarantee an apprehension of Truth. The Bereans and the Pharisees both searched the Scriptures, but the Pharisees had a doctrine while the Bereans had a Man (compare Acts 17:10-12 with John 5:38-40). The difference is incalculable. :: -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
Dave Hansen wrote: DAVEH: Hm againWould you consider Jesus to have been cultish, if that is the right term? Or perhaps a better question, would he have been considered to have been the founder (or focal point) of a cult? Cult leader is exactly how He was viewed by the chief priest, and others. Terry
Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: [Infinite Supply] Sunday, September 26, 2004]
In a message dated 9/26/2004 6:55:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "If any man among you seems to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God" (I Corinthians 3:18,19). Man places a high value on education, instruction, learning, and knowledge. Perhaps these things have their place, but in spiritual matters they mean nothing. Indeed, when the Spirit of the Lord begins to give us the Hidden Wisdom, we find it is contrary to the wisdom of this world. In order to see as He sees we must be willing to embrace the unknown and the unfamiliar. Paul warns that in the last days perilous times will come. He tells us of a sort of people who are "ever learning, and never able to come to the full-knowledge (epignosis) of Truth" (II Timothy 3:7). There is no lack of instruction and learning, no lack of Bible teachers and Bible studies, but there is a lack of experiential Truth. That is, people have truth as a "thing" instead of Truth as a Man. This demonstrates that an accumulation of knowledge does not guarantee an apprehension of Truth. The Bereans and the Pharisees both searched the Scriptures, but the Pharisees had a doctrine while the Bereans had a Man (compare Acts 17:10-12 with John 5:38-40). The difference is incalculable. Amen to this one. John
RE: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
DAVEH: Hm.Can Jesus be classified as either a liberal or conservative? By political definition, Jesus was a liberal (I hate to admit this). And most conservativesn our day would have defended the status quo of the 1st century. John In all seriousness, I think the question is not Can Jesus be classified as either a liberal or conservative? The question is, Which of those two philosophies today most reflects Jesus? You know what I think of that. Izzy
RE: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 Real Simple magazine
Personally, I believe is it unconscionable for any follower of Christ in America to NOT vote for President Bushs re-election. The only alternative, not a third party candidate, but Kerry. This actually kind of bothers me a little. I will not vote for Kerry for a number of reasons. But my vote -- ok, it is for Bush --- is a secular consideration. I certainly do not believe that the Republican Party is God's party. I actually do not consider Kerry to be evil. But what are his core values? No one really knows. And with 40 days remaining to election, he has no intentions of letting us know what those values are. So, he does not get my vote. Abortion? No biggie -- yes, I said no biggie. If the churched would get off its collective butt, abortions would be a tenth of what they are today. We, the churched, want an end to abortion on demand but we do not want to care for the 1.3 million newborns as a result. Its the old be thou warmed and filled mentality. John (this is why I am not a pastor any more) Smithson Let me reiterate! I dont believe any earthly political party is Gods party. But I do believe that we, who call ourselves by His name, have a serious responsibility to vote, and vote for whichever party will most advance His kingdom. You say No one knows what Kerrys core values are. Where have you BEEN??? Did you read my post on that? Please dont pretend it isnt obvious; not only his values, but his personal character, are abhorrent to me as a Believer. Furthermore, there is a difference between the be thou warmed and filled mentality and turning people into slaves of a welfare system. The Republican Party believes in teaching a man to fish; not just giving him a fish. You should know that by now. For the life of me, I dont know why you think that the laws of our land allowing for the murder of the unborn is not a stench in the nostrils of God. Izzy
RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 12:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm In a message dated 9/25/2004 6:55:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling for a mandatory evacuation of low-lying areas, mobile homes, and manufactured homes. This has been an interesting six weeks with four storms. I don't understand why Michael doesn't simply pray these storms into Russia. If we have power over the weather, why not that? Serious as a heart attack, brother John Why on earth would you accuse Michael of wanting to do that??? Was that nice? Do you not realize that God can just dissolve a storm? Izzy
Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
ShieldsFamily wrote: In all seriousness, I think the question is not Can Jesus be classified as either a liberal or conservative? The question is, Which of those two philosophies today most reflects Jesus? You know what I think of that. Izzy Good thinking Iz. Terry
Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:48:38 -0400 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ||To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm In a message dated 9/25/2004 6:55:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling for a mandatory evacuation of low-lying areas, mobile homes, and manufactured homes...I don't understand why Michael doesn't simply pray these storms into Russia...brother John [..God can..dissolve a storm..] Izzy Maybe He could just send it where they need the rain.Terry * John, Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:05:19 EDT ..And then we have those who do not and will never "know better." They are those stunted by unenlightened teaching, superstitions.. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and you be destroyed in your way, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him. Ps 2
Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
DAVEH: How do you think the prevailing establishment would have perceived him, John? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 9/25/2004 11:14:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Hm againWould you consider Jesus to have been cultish, if that is the right term? Or perhaps a better question, would he have been considered to have been the founder (or focal point) of a cult? Not at all. His gospel, given full revelation in the writings of Paul and others, simply mirrors the "hidden: agenda of the Father from the beginning of time. An example of this would be David's comments in Ps 51, telling all those who would read that psalm that God cares more for true worship (brokenness and contribtion than prescribed acts of worship [i.e. sacrifices], even if they were presecibed by Him. The message has always been there -- it got lost in man's evolving effort at solving his own problems in his own way. IMO a brother, John -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 Real Simple magazine
Of course(!); and acc to the NT,the RNChas nothin' to do with JC: As Jesus walked beside the Sea of Galilee, he saw Simon and his brother Andrew casting a net into the lake, for they were fishermen. "Come, follow me," Jesus said, "and I will make you fishers of men." At once they left their nets and followed him. [Mk 1, NIV] G On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:30:48 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Republican Party believes in teaching a man to fish
Fw: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 Real Simple magazine
- Forwarded Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:18:44 EDT Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 "Real Simple" magazine Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Please pass this on to TT...My son was running the sound system for President Bush at a rally last week in Charlotte, NC. During the rehearsals before the rally, a local singing group was practicing. They sung a song that had the word "Jesus" in it.Immediately, they were stopped, and told in no uncertain terms that the song with the word "Jesus" in it WAS NOT ALLOWED! Just thought that [those who confuse] Christ with the Republican Party should know... [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:33:31 -0600 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 "Real Simple" magazine Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Of course(!); and acc to the NT,the RNChas nothin' to do with JC: As Jesus walked beside the Sea of Galilee, he saw Simon and his brother Andrew casting a net into the lake, for they were fishermen. "Come, follow me," Jesus said, "and I will make you fishers of men." At once they left their nets and followed him. [Mk 1, NIV] G On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:30:48 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Republican Party believes in teaching a man to fish
RE: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 Real Simple magazine
Not everyone is called to fish for men exclusively. Most of us are called to do both simultaneously. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] >From the 10/04 Real Simple magazine Of course(!); and acc to the NT,the RNChas nothin' to do with JC: As Jesus walked beside the Sea of Galilee, he saw Simon and his brother Andrew casting a net into the lake, for they were fishermen. Come, follow me, Jesus said, and I will make you fishers of men. At once they left their nets and followed him. [Mk 1, NIV] G On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:30:48 -0500 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Republican Party believes in teaching a man to fish
Re: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 Real Simple magazine
only those on the hook On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:39:33 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Not everyone is called to fish for men
RE: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
I think Jesus was a liberal... but He was a religious liberal. He was not a political liberal. After all, He seemed to suggest a more passive stance against Rome than the Zealots. Yeshua would not have been cultic. He was a House Hillel Pharisee who spoke against the conservative [religious] position held by House Shammai Pharisees. In fact, He spoke vehemently against them often (remember the "Woe to you" phrases)? [For more information on this topic, see the book... Jesus the Pharisee..." if you can find it affordable!] -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave HansenSent: Sunday, 26 September, 2004 12.23To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or DemocratDAVEH: How do you think the prevailing establishment would have perceived him, John?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 9/25/2004 11:14:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Hm againWould you consider Jesus to have been cultish, if that is the right term? Or perhaps a better question, would he have been considered to have been the founder (or focal point) of a cult?Not at all. His gospel, given full revelation in the writings of Paul and others, simply mirrors the "hidden: agenda of the Father from the beginning of time. An example of this would be David's comments in Ps 51, telling all those who would read that psalm that God cares more for true worship (brokenness and contribtion than prescribed acts of worship [i.e. sacrifices], even if they were presecibed by Him. The message has always been there -- it got lost in man's evolving effort at solving his own problems in his own way. IMOa brother,John-- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
RE: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 Real Simple magazine
G... I wanted to let you know that I liked that post. It stands near the top of my favorites. Well done and God be blessed. -- slade -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, 26 September, 2004 12.34To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 "Real Simple" magazine Of course(!); and acc to the NT,the RNChas nothin' to do with JC: As Jesus walked beside the Sea of Galilee, he saw Simon and his brother Andrew casting a net into the lake, for they were fishermen. "Come, follow me," Jesus said, "and I will make you fishers of men." At once they left their nets and followed him. [Mk 1, NIV] G On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:30:48 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Republican Party believes in teaching a man to fish
RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
There seems to be a war on the faith of the saints. My boy (Ian / Shem Yisrael: Hanokh) and I prayed that God would protect our important things. We packed up and left at 0520. Ian prayed that God would protect everything but [his] mom's china (after all, we never use the china so it's not considered a valued thing). He cracked me up (oops... another idiom... What I mean is... he made me laugh). I agree, I would LOVE to see many wake up in the Light of Messiah and embrace the Truth. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of michael douglasSent: Saturday, 25 September, 2004 22.43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm Michael D: What do you make of it, Slade? This is very serious business. I feel for you guys. I am fighting with you all. As I write here, it's already at your coast. I am praying for God's mercy while I try to add my fight. Thank God Izzy is in on the battle. May God bless her, and all that add their faith to this defence. I have not noticed anyone in Florida showing willingness to take a position for agreement yet. It may be difficult for some because of the evacuation order. May the people of Florida wake up also to the light and embrace the Lord Jesus an a broad scale. And may God protect His people, always. Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling for a mandatory evacuation of low-lying areas, mobile homes, and manufactured homes. This has been an interesting six weeks with four storms. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of michael douglasSent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 18.40To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm Michael D: I'm relieved to see that. This area is to volatile to take lightly. Anyway, another storm threat is looming over the U.S. Florida again is in the firing line according to latest forcasts. How tough a prospect for you folks out there. I remember sharing some weeks ago that the Lord showed me that the reason the authority over weather was being discussed on TT at this time was that folks would need to have that insight to deal with the things coming their way. That was after Charley. Never did I imagine that what has transpired so far is what He was trying to prepare folks for. I know that we've had alot of back and forth opinions about this area, but I want to reiterate the message. Folks have to take up the fight with authority and faith over their own backyard. I encourage you folks up north to resist the elements and speak death to the system, forbidding it from affecting you. If light comes and we don't walk in it we are left only with darkness, Jesus said. God has brought help. Folks should rise up and avail themselves of it. In all that has happened, God has been merciful in response to the fight of His people. I will continue to join the battle with you folks, but the coalition of the willing must stand up and be counted for their land, not forgetting to inteercede for those who are lost in the process that they might come to light. I know some folks have said that they don't believe in this stuff. Well, that's why I've shared volumes of my life experiences with you all that you may know that this is real. Is it that folks don't believe what I am saying and think I am making this stuff up? I have used many passages of scripture to support what I have been sharing. I feel like I've piped to a people all the day long... My hope is that folks will hear, and as Judy eloquently offered,press throughto the next level. It's not necessarily going to be perfect the first time or second ... but God expects us to grow from faith to faith and from glory to glory. One thing I don't want is to get stuck in the same level of faith and glory that former generations had. I want to press deep into the next level of exceeding abundantly above all that we can ask or think. God allows the challenges and threats ofcrises so that He can bring us there. Without it, most if not all of us would not press into it. So can we rally the troops one more time for a greatere measure of grace in God's inteervention with this threat. Again, a firm point of agreement will be important. Any takers? Will anyone seriously agree that that God turns the storm away
RE: [TruthTalk] Dan Rather Biased
How old are you, John???!? My father was in the Pacific Theater. Began at Guadalcanal in the 1st Marine Division. He ended his combat "career" at Iwo Jima when he was wounded. His 21st birthday was celebrated in grand style: the bombing of Hiroshima (6 Aug 1945). He is 80 today. I am 40. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, 26 September, 2004 01.47To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dan Rather BiasedIn a message dated 9/25/2004 1:10:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm glad the soldiers who fought and died so bravely on D-Day and throughout World War II did so decades ago. In the 1940s war was hell, but at least our troops didn't have to fight the folks back home.true. My brother fought on D Day -- 1st Army, Core of Engineers. It ruin him. And I believe that God understood. John
RE: [TruthTalk] [Infinite Supply] Sunday, September 26, 2004]
This is terrible dribble if the author is referring to good, solid religious education. It's a half-truth if it's referring to good, solidsecular education. Mathematics and science has provided a good foundation for both pagans, heathens, and believers. An excellent grasp of these sciences can provide grand opportunities for the believer to witness to the worldly wise. -- slade -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, 26 September, 2004 10.13To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Infinite Supply] Sunday, September 26, 2004]In a message dated 9/26/2004 6:55:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "If any man among you seems to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God" (I Corinthians 3:18,19). Man places a high value on education, instruction, learning, and knowledge.Perhaps these things have their place, but in spiritual matters they mean nothing. Indeed, when the Spirit of the Lord begins to give us the HiddenWisdom, we find it is contrary to the wisdom of this world. In order to see as He sees we must be willing to embrace the unknown and the unfamiliar. Paul warns that in the last days perilous times will come. He tells us of asort of people who are "ever learning, and never able to come to thefull-knowledge (epignosis) of Truth" (II Timothy 3:7). There is no lack of instruction and learning, no lack of Bible teachers and Bible studies,but there is a lack of experiential Truth. That is, people have truth as a "thing" instead of Truth as a Man. This demonstrates that an accumulationof knowledge does not guarantee an apprehension of Truth. The Bereans and the Pharisees both searched the Scriptures, but the Pharisees had a doctrinewhile the Bereans had a Man (compare Acts 17:10-12 with John 5:38-40). The difference is incalculable. Amen to this one.John
Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
As near as I can tell, a copy of this book is around $100 right now! I wish mine would hurry up and get here! On a serious note Slade, you just confirmed a musing of mine from a couple of years ago. Now I know I'll enjoy this book! Jeff - Original Message - From: Slade Henson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 16:02 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat I think Jesus was a liberal... but He was a religious liberal. He was not a political liberal. After all, He seemed to suggest a more passive stance against Rome than the Zealots. Yeshua would not have been cultic. He was a House Hillel Pharisee who spoke against the conservative [religious] position held by House Shammai Pharisees. In fact, He spoke vehemently against them often (remember the "Woe to you" phrases)? [For more information on this topic, see the book... Jesus the Pharisee..." if you can find it affordable!] -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave HansenSent: Sunday, 26 September, 2004 12.23To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or DemocratDAVEH: How do you think the prevailing establishment would have perceived him, John?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 9/25/2004 11:14:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Hm againWould you consider Jesus to have been cultish, if that is the right term? Or perhaps a better question, would he have been considered to have been the founder (or focal point) of a cult?Not at all. His gospel, given full revelation in the writings of Paul and others, simply mirrors the "hidden: agenda of the Father from the beginning of time. An example of this would be David's comments in Ps 51, telling all those who would read that psalm that God cares more for true worship (brokenness and contribtion than prescribed acts of worship [i.e. sacrifices], even if they were presecibed by Him. The message has always been there -- it got lost in man's evolving effort at solving his own problems in his own way. IMOa brother,John-- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
Izzy, interesting is the understatement of the year if you ask me. It's maddening to have the sheriff's dept. rolling through your neighborhood at 10PM issuing a mandatory evacuation. As if that isn't bad enough, theres no place to go! Gotta love hurricane season!! Jeff - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 10:32 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 12:08 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm In a message dated 9/25/2004 6:55:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling for a mandatory evacuation of low-lying areas, mobile homes, and manufactured homes. This has been an interesting six weeks with four storms. I don't understand why Michael doesn't simply pray these storms into Russia. If we have power over the weather, why not that? Serious as a heart attack, brother John Why on earth would you accuse Michael of wanting to do that??? Was that nice? Do you not realize that God can just dissolve a storm? Izzy
Re: [TruthTalk] Dan Rather Biased
Sorry John, all I said was Amen to this statement. IIRC it was Izzy that posted this quote! Jeff - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 1:47 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dan Rather Biased In a message dated 9/25/2004 1:10:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm glad the soldiers who fought and died so bravely on D-Day and throughout World War II did so decades ago. In the 1940s war was hell, but at least our troops didn't have to fight the folks back home.true. My brother fought on D Day -- 1st Army, Core of Engineers. It ruin him. And I believe that God understood. John
Re: [TruthTalk] [Infinite Supply] Sunday, September 26, 2004]
Slade Henson wrote: This is terrible dribble if the author is referring to good, solid religious education. It's a half-truth if it's referring to good, solidsecular education. Mathematics and science has provided a good foundation for both pagans, heathens, and believers. An excellent grasp of these sciences can provide grand opportunities for the believer to witness to the worldly wise. -- slade You are arguing with God , my friend. He is the author. Terry
RE: [TruthTalk] [Infinite Supply] Sunday, September 26, 2004
Please give me the address for the following "biblical" passage: Man places a high value on education, instruction, learning, and knowledge. Perhaps these things have their place, but in spiritual matters they mean nothing. Indeed, when the Spirit of the Lord begins to give us the Hidden Wisdom, we find it is contrary to the wisdom of this world. In order to see as He sees we must be willing to embrace the unknown and the unfamiliar. Paul warns that in the last days perilous times will come. He tells us of a sort of people who are "ever learning, and never able to come to the full-knowledge (epignosis) of Truth" (II Timothy 3:7). There is no lack of instruction and learning, no lack of Bible teachers and Bible studies, but there is a lack of experiential Truth. That is, people have truth as a"thing" instead of Truth as a Man. This demonstrates that an accumulation of knowledge does not guarantee an apprehension of Truth. The Bereans and the Pharisees both searched the Scriptures, but the Pharisees had a doctrine while the Bereans had a Man (compare Acts 17:10-12 with John 5:38-40). The difference is incalculable. -- slade -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Terry CliftonSent: Sunday, 26 September, 2004 16.04To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [TruthTalk] [Infinite Supply] Sunday, September 26, 2004 You are arguing with God , my friend. He is the author.Terry
Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
In a message dated 9/26/2004 7:26:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Hm.Can Jesus be classified as either a liberal or conservative? By political definition, Jesus was a liberal (I hate to admit this). And most "conservatives"n our day would have defended the status quo of the 1st century. John In all seriousness, I think the question is not Can Jesus be classified as either a liberal or conservative? The question is, Which of those two philosophies today most reflects Jesus? You know what I think of that. Izzy And what is the "conservative philosphy?" Is one a conservative if he believes in states rights, a decreasing federal reality, balanced budgets, a dynamic national defense system and a woman's right to choose? Or, what if one is pro-life, prayer in schools, pro medical mariwana, and anti - gun. Or, what if one is pro-life, pro prayer in schools, pro "in God we trust," for state's rights, for balance budgets, pro national defgense, pro traditional marriage, anti-gay (whatever that is), anti-NEA, for closing the borders by force if necessary and pro socialized medicine? Or, what if he did not have time for politics of any kind, did not vote, and minitered to hundreds of individuals each and every year? John
Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
In a message dated 9/26/2004 7:33:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling for a mandatory evacuation of low-lying areas, mobile homes, and manufactured homes. This has been an interesting six weeks with four storms. I don't understand why Michael doesn't simply pray these storms into Russia. If we have power over the weather, why not that? Serious as a heart attack, brother John Why on earth would you accuse Michael of wanting to do that??? Was that nice? Do you not realize that God can just dissolve a storm? Izzy You lost me. I am accusing Michael of what? Does he not believe that Christians have authority over the weather? But now that you mention it, what am I to believe? God can dissolve storms -- so why has He not done this with the four storms to strike Florida -- or is it #5 now? John
RE: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat
Izzy in red below. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 3:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Republican or Democrat In a message dated 9/26/2004 7:26:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Hm.Can Jesus be classified as either a liberal or conservative? By political definition, Jesus was a liberal (I hate to admit this). And most conservativesn our day would have defended the status quo of the 1st century. John In all seriousness, I think the question is not Can Jesus be classified as either a liberal or conservative? The question is, Which of those two philosophies today most reflects Jesus? You know what I think of that. Izzy And what is the conservative philosphy? Is one a conservative if he believes in states rights, a decreasing federal reality, balanced budgets, a dynamic national defense system and a woman's right to choose? Or, what if one is pro-life, prayer in schools, pro medical mariwana, and anti - gun. Or, what if one is pro-life, pro prayer in schools, pro in God we trust, for state's rights, for balance budgets, pro national defgense, pro traditional marriage, anti-gay (whatever that is), anti-NEA, for closing the borders by force if necessary and pro socialized medicine? Or, what if he did not have time for politics of any kind, did not vote, and minitered to hundreds of individuals each and every year? John What is your problem, John? Izzy