Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn]

2006-03-12 Thread Lance Muir



Doesn't it make you just beam with pride, the 
appropriate kind of course, being exposed to the handiwork of two such fine 
representatives of 'their' gospel as DEAN AND KEVIN! IFO speak often of them. I 
share their posts with friends who then say things like 


  From: 
  Dave 
  To: TruthTalk 
  Sent: March 12, 2006 02:52
  Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of 
  Hinn]
  What could his intentions really 
  be?DAVEH: I don't know. I'm only hearing one side 
  of the story, and without knowing his inner thoughts and circumstances, it 
  would be difficult for anybody to judge him.if you were to 
  impune those present or SP's would tha t include 
  me?DAVEH: Only if you were guilty. Just because 
  you are one of the SPers does not mean that you are a bad one, if that 
  is the proper way to put it.why you do not see this as 
  ADHOM.DAVEH: Because I did not name you as one 
  teaching the guy to do what he did. If you feel guilty by association, 
  then that is your problem. Maybe I am wrong, but if DavidM had 
  been there, I can't imagine him doing anything to influence the guy to do what 
  he did. Though DavidM is certainly a SPer, if he didn't do anything, he 
  ain't guilty, even though he may associate with those who are guilty. I 
  hope that makes some senseSince it is one of the rules, we 
  are stuck with itDAVEH: Apparently, rules really 
  bother some SPers. If a moderator doesn't want to follow one of the 
  rules, and then makes up rules to keep somebody else from posting material the 
  moderator doesn't likedoesn't that qualify as a double 
  standard?I would not want you to think thatI believe that 
  the ends justify the means.DAVEH: Thanx 
  for the clarification, Kevin. Sometimes it seems that you do believe 
  that way when you post LDS related material and draw inaccurate conclusions 
  about it.I am not a Lying Protestant! 
  DAVEH: Hmmm...putting it that way, one might 
  conclude you are claiming to be a truthful Protestant.
  
DAVEH: Is that not one of the possibilities to consider 
when a person seems seems sensitive to an issue?

Thanks Dave, you are one of the only people on TT that really shows 
such understanding. As you have correctly figured, I am a very sensitive 
guy, I am just a real cream puff!

Well if one followed the thread you were responding to Dean as to his 
comment that a Mormon had encouraged SP's to tear pics of the LDS 'prophet', 
He even supplied the pics. AS it was implied he was not the nicest guy in 
Salt Lake. What could his intentions really be? Would he 
qualify as let me borrow the term "snake"? He betrays his own religion. 

"DH .Sounds like something he learned 
from SPers."
Seeing as I was present and I am a SP and very possibly PUBLIC ENEMY #2 
as to the LDS, if you were to impune those present or SP's would tha t 
include me? I don't see why you do not see this as 
ADHOM. as an aside, I am actually against such a rule and think it 
is foolish we do more talk about ADHOM than any other subject. As you might 
have noticed I posted yesterday some verses thatshow that Paul under 
fullness of the Holy Ghost attacked the person of Elymas. There is a use for 
labels and it is just that; to IDENTIFY. The Erroneous use of labels is in 
attempting to use them as a part of a "logical" argument. Since it is 
one of the rules, we are stuck with it. I see the intent of the 
rulesince who wants to read O yeah yur mutha wears combat boots 
(excuse me PLEAZE, keep your hat on, Gary) 

As to whyI might seem sensitive.
I would not want you to think thatI believe that the 
ends justify the means.

That there is anything such as

"lying f or the lord" LDS

"Theocratic War Stategy" (lying) Jehovah Witness 

see Watchtower mag 1957 5/1 "Use Theocratic War Strategy"
http://p089.ezboard.com/fsabdiscussionboardfrm15.showMessage?topicID=332.topic
http://www.freeminds.org/psych/whylie.htm
http://www.letusreason.org/JW8.htmLying 
to the public

"lie of necessity" Roman CATholic http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09469a.htm 


Just Lies RC - Reformed Catholic- Reformed Confederate 
Theocrats - Protestants
http://www.americanvision.org/articlearchive/12-20-04.asp"So 
then, from this brief analysis of the Old Testament, there are times when it 
is appropriate to lie" Gary Demar (RC)
http://www.entrewave.com/freebooks/docs/a_pdfs/cc_2.pdf
The commandment does not say 
that "thou shalt never tell a lie."

"Rahab risked everything in order to 
follow the laws of God, including telling Lies" John 
Whitehead The Theology of Christian Resistance 1983 

"But does God require us to tell the 
trut

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-10 Thread Kevin Deegan
DAVEH: Is that not one of the possibilities to consider when a person seems seems sensitive to an issue?Thanks Dave, you are one of the only people on TT that really shows such understanding. As you have correctly figured, I am a very sensitive guy, I am just a real cream puff!Well if one followed the thread you were responding to Dean as to his comment that a Mormon had encouraged SP's to tear pics of the LDS 'prophet', He even supplied the pics. AS it was implied he was not the nicest guy in Salt Lake. What could his intentions really be? Would he qualify as let me borrow the term "snake"? He betrays his own religion.   "DH .Sounds like something he learned from SPers."  Seeing as I was present and I am a SP and very possibly PUBLIC ENEMY #2 as to the LDS, if you were to impune those present or SP's would that
 include me? I don't see why you do not see this as ADHOM. as an aside, I am actually against such a rule and think it is foolish we do more talk about ADHOM than any other subject. As you might have noticed I posted yesterday some verses thatshow that Paul under fullness of the Holy Ghost attacked the person of Elymas. There is a use for labels and it is just that; to IDENTIFY. The Erroneous use of labels is in attempting to use them as a part of a "logical" argument. Since it is one of the rules, we are stuck with it. I see the intent of the rulesince who wants to read O yeah yur mutha wears combat boots (excuse me PLEAZE, keep your hat on, Gary) As to whyI might seem sensitive.  I would not want you to think thatI believe that the ends justify the means.That there is anything such as"lying for the
 lord" LDS"Theocratic War Stategy" (lying) Jehovah Witness   see Watchtower mag 1957 5/1 "Use Theocratic War Strategy"  http://p089.ezboard.com/fsabdiscussionboardfrm15.showMessage?topicID=332.topic  http://www.freeminds.org/psych/whylie.htm  http://www.letusreason.org/JW8.htmLying to the public"lie of necessity" Roman CATholic http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09469a.htm Just Lies RC - Reformed Catholic- Reformed Confederate Theocrats - Protestants  http://www.americanvision.org/articlearchive/12-20-04.asp"So then, from this brief analysis of the Old Testament, there are times when it is appropriate to lie" Gary Demar (RC)  http://www.entrewave.com/freebooks/docs/a_pdfs/cc_2.pdf  The commandment does not say that "thou shalt never tell a lie.""Rahab risked everything in order to follow the laws of God, including telling Lies" John Whitehead The Theology of Christian Resistance 1983 "But does God require us to
 tell the truth at all times? Such a proposition is highly questionable". R J Rushdoony Institutes of Biblical Law 1972 p 543I am not a Lying Protestant!There is something seriously perverted  wrong with anyone that thinks it is RIGHT to Lie The long philosophic discussions of the circumstances were lying may be employed, are very illuminating shows of the darkness enveloping these minds. Doing wrong is NEVER RIGHT! The following is not "HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE"!  THOU SHALT NOT LIEWhat would give folks such thoughts?  Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Guilt? What would give you such thoughts?DAVEH: Is that
 not one of the possibilities to consider when a person seems seems sensitive to an issue? I can't imagine DavidM being sensitive to what I said about SPers, yet you seemed to consider my comment an ad-hom.why? Your name wasn't mentioned. Not even was a specific action mentioned. Yet it appeared as though you identified with something underlying. Makes me wonder what makes you tick, KevinDo you really think my speculative comment constitutes an ad-hom? If sospecifically to whom is the ad-hom against?Kevin Deegan wrote: Guilt? What would give you such thoughts?Titus Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.  Notice it is
 persons that are defiled not their thoughts/beliefs.  It is people that are cast into HELL not their beliefs!Do you feel comfortable with SPers who do such, or use other demeaning tactics such as waving underwear?  Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them.Jesus taught that those that are offended have no root in themselves MT 13:21 and can not endure.  Are you saying Mormons are ABOVE REPROACH?  Pr 15:10 Correction i s grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die.  2 Tim 4:2-4 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.For the time will come when they will not
 endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.  1 Jn 3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this 

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-10 Thread Kevin Deegan
.innglory.org  Sent: 3/9/2006 3:58:51 AM   Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinngave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so.DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of respect, Dean.  cd: That wasn't not done out of respect. I just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He told us that Mormons loved the present Prophet (so-called) more then they loved J. Smith-then gave us the picturesthen instructed us to tear them up in front of the Temple. Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH? Would a Mormon High Priest do such?I guess I will Get DavH off you
 backDAVEH: ??? Does that mean you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean? Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't recall saying anything to him recently that would be disrespectful..But if he wants me gone, it is within your power to carry out his wishes.  cd: Dave you need to learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore. All I meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attentionDAVEH: How considerate of you, Judge Dean! I guess I should fee pr ivileged that you are willing to devote all your attention to me to the exclusion of other TTers. It
 does seem a bit selfish though.as you seem to want to smoke all the Ad. Hom. grass yourself!!! Just don't inhale though, as you might choke on it..  =-O   cd: Sound like you also like a good fight-You admitted to provocking me and I am answering your caslling out andI am standing here Mormon-lets get on with it Pagan.Dean Moore wrote: cd: Ouch:-) Hey I have that picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what was his name?)with gave us c opies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so . Kevin I guess I will Get DavH off
 you back for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I might as well get stated on that:-)So I will be busy for a while-Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention.
		Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 


Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Dave Hansen





gave us copies to tear up in
from of the Temple-but we didn't do so.

DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of respect,
Dean.

I guess I will Get DavH off you
back

DAVEH: ??? Does that mean you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean?
Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't
recall saying anything to him recently that would be
disrespectful..But if he wants me gone, it is within your power to
carry out his wishes.

Group Please keep off the Ad.
Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention

DAVEH: How considerate of you, Judge Dean! I guess I should fee
privileged that you are willing to devote all your attention to me to
the exclusion of other TTers. It does seem a bit selfish though.as
you seem to want to smoke all the Ad.
Hom. grass yourself!!! Just don't inhale though,
as you might choke on it..  
=-O 

Dean Moore wrote:

  
  
  cd: Ouch:-) Hey I have that
picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what was his
name?)with gave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but
we didn't do so. Kevin I guess I will Get DavH off you back
for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I might as well get
stated on that:-)So I will be busy for a while-Group Please keep off
the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention.
  
  
  


-- 
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.




Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Dean Moore








- Original Message - 
From: Dave Hansen 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/9/2006 3:58:51 AM 
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

gave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so.DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of respect, Dean.
cd: That wasn't not done out of respect. I just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He told us that Mormons loved the present Prophet (so-called) more then they loved J. Smith-then gave us the picturesthen instructed us to tear them up in front of the Temple. Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH? Would a Mormon High Priest do such?I guess I will Get DavH off you backDAVEH: ??? Does that mean you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean? Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't recall saying anything to him recently that would be disrespectful..But if he wants me gone, it is within your power to carry out his wishes.
cd: Dave you need to learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore. All I meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attentionDAVEH: How considerate of you, Judge Dean! I guess I should fee privileged that you are willing to devote all your attention to me to the exclusion of other TTers. It does seem a bit selfish though.as you seem to want to smoke all the Ad. Hom. grass yourself!!! Just don't inhale though, as you might choke on it..  =-O 
cd: Sound like you also like a good fight-You admitted to provocking me and I am answering your caslling out andI am standing here Mormon-lets get on with it Pagan.Dean Moore wrote: 



cd: Ouch:-) Hey I have that picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what was his name?)with gave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so. Kevin I guess I will Get DavH off you back for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I might as well get stated on that:-)So I will be busy for a while-Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention.

-- 
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Lance Muir



One wonders with what frequency the _expression_ 
'let's get it on' refers to a conversation? Don't you get most of this out of 
your system Dean at the dojo? By the by 'master' Dean, just how much of the 
Eastern philosophy have you assimilated?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Dean 
  Moore 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 09, 2006 07:13
  Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] 
  spirit of Hinn
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Dave Hansen 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/9/2006 3:58:51 AM 
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] 
spirit of Hinn

gave us copies to tear up 
in from of the Temple-but we didn't do 
so.DAVEH: Thank you 
for that measure of respect, Dean.
cd: That wasn't not done out of respect. I 
just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He told us that Mormons loved 
the present Prophet (so-called) more then they loved J. Smith-then gave us 
the picturesthen instructed us to tear them up in front of the Temple. 
Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH? Would a Mormon High 
Priest do such?I guess I will Get DavH off you 
backDAVEH: ??? Does that mean 
you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean? 
Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't 
recall saying anything to him recently that would be disrespectful..But 
if he wants me gone, it is within your power to carry out his wishes.
cd: Dave you need to learn to separate the 
Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore. All I meant was that we are headed 
to our usual takeno prisoners 
debate.Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can 
give the "Provoker" some 
attentionDAVEH: How considerate of 
you, Judge Dean! I guess I should fee privileged that you are 
willing to devote all your attention to me to the exclusion of other 
TTers. It does seem a bit selfish though.as you seem to want to 
smoke all the Ad. Hom. 
grass yourself!!! Just don't inhale 
though, as you might choke on it..  =-O 
cd: Sound 
like you also like a good fight-You admitted to provocking me and I am 
answering your caslling out andI am standing here Mormon-lets get on 
with it Pagan.Dean Moore wrote: 

  
  
  cd: Ouch:-) Hey I have that 
  picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what was his 
  name?)with gave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we 
  didn't do so. Kevin I guess I will Get DavH off you back 
  for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I might as well get 
  stated on that:-)So I will be busy for a while-Group Please keep off 
  the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some 
  attention.
  
  -- 
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.


Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Kevin Deegan
I do not want you gone Dave.  Please don't misrepresent me I have never said or implied such I am not a pope protestant or potentate!  Banishment and worse is a Popish - Protestant distinctive!  This is in their belief system  I have told you before I am not of the RC nor their offspring the protestants!  I do not chase people down the street come over here Mormon. Repent or else I will...  I will preach but if you are offended plug you ears and avert youe eyes as I have previouslt stated on this forum  The Supreme court has said the same.  I believe in freedom of speech AND conscience.  I have no desire to enforce my beliefs on you.  I have a desire as the scriptures speak, that God willgive you aheart of flesh and eternal life.Ido not complain about you  I hardly know you!  Iam against
 certain beliefs, that does not mean we could not be friends and still disagree STRONGLY. Ask myLDS friendsO I left out POTENTATES such as Hinckley  The thinking has been done according to your leaders ya know.  You have no problem with the draconian rules of your leaders?Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:- Original Message - From: Dave Hansen   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: 3/9/2006 3:58:51 AM   Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinngave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so.DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of respect, Dean.  cd: That wasn't not done out of respect. I just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He told us that Mormons loved the present Prophet (so-called) more then they loved J. Smith-then gave us the picturesthen instructed us to tear them up in front of the Temple. Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH? Would a Mormon High Priest do
 such?I guess I will Get DavH off you backDAVEH: ??? Does that mean you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean? Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't recall saying anything to him recently that would be disrespectful..But if he wants me gone, it is within your power to carry out his wishes.  cd: Dave you need to learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore. All I meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attentionDAVEH: How considerate of you, Judge Dean! I guess I should fee privileged
 that you are willing to devote all your attention to me to the exclusion of other TTers. It does seem a bit selfish though.as you seem to want to smoke all the Ad. Hom. grass yourself!!! Just don't inhale though, as you might choke on it..  =-O   cd: Sound like you also like a good fight-You admitted to provocking me and I am answering your caslling out andI am standing here Mormon-lets get on with it Pagan.Dean Moore wrote: cd: Ouch:-) Hey I have that picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what was his name?)with gave us copies to
 tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so. Kevin I guess I will Get DavH off you back for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I might as well get stated on that:-)So I will be busy for a while-Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention.--   ~~~  Dave Hansen  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.langlitz.com  ~~~  If you wish to receive  things I find interesting,  I maintain six email lists...  JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,  STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
 http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Dave Hansen





That wasn't not done
out of respect. 

DAVEH: Hmm...Do you have any respect for Mormons, Dean?

Sure sounded like a set
up to me? You agree DaveH?

DAVEH: Hmmm again.Sounds like something he learned from SPers.

Would a Mormon High
Priest do such?

DAVEH: None that I know would do such. Hmmm a third
time..Perhaps he was a SPer claiming to be MHP. If he was indeed a
true Mormon, I believe his actions were inappropriate, and I will
apologize to you in his behalf.  However, I dislike drawing
conclusions without hearing the his side of the story.

Dave you need to learn
to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.

DAVEH: That's a mistake I've seen other moderators use as an excuse
for improper behavior. Do you believe that separating Judge Dean from Judge More
absolves you from responsible behavior? If Judge Dean posts an ad-hom,
would not be reasonable to expect Judge More admonish
him? If not, then would Judge
More be practicing a double standard?

 Perhaps I do have trouble separating the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.when
I hear you say something to the effect..

Group Please keep
off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention

I pretty much hear Judge
More's voice, despite your claim that it is
Judge Dean's lips that are moving. I can't see which side of the mouth
you are speaking from, Judge Dean. I can only read your words and
interpret them as coming from one who intends to takeno prisoners.

All I meant was
that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.

DAVEH: You are the one who called me a pagan, Judge Dean. If you
wish to refuse to apologize for making that ad-hom remark, and if Judge
Moore does not call you on the carpet for posting blatant ad-homs, then
would Judge Moore be justified in giving me the boot if I merely
referred to Judge Dean's ___(fill in the blank) practices? Your takeno prisoners comment
seems to imply TT is not big enough for both of us, Judge Dean. Is
that where you want to go with this?


  
gave us copies to
tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so.

DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of respect,
Dean.
cd: That wasn't not done out
of respect. I just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He told
us that Mormons loved the present Prophet (so-called) more then they
loved J. Smith-then gave us the picturesthen instructed us to tear
them up in front of the Temple. Sure sounded like a set up to me?
You agree DaveH? Would a Mormon High Priest do such?

I guess I will Get DavH off
you back

DAVEH: ??? Does that mean you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean?
Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't
recall saying anything to him recently that would be
disrespectful..But if he wants me gone, it is within your power to
carry out his wishes.
cd: Dave you need to learn
to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore. All I
meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.

Group Please keep off the Ad.
Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention

DAVEH: How considerate of you, Judge Dean! I guess I should fee
privileged that you are willing to devote all your attention to me to
the exclusion of other TTers. It does seem a bit selfish though.as
you seem to want to smoke all the Ad.
Hom. grass yourself!!! Just don't inhale though,
as you might choke on it..  =-O

cd:
Sound like you also like a good fight-You admitted to provocking me and
I am answering your caslling out andI am standing here Mormon-lets get
on with it Pagan.

Dean Moore wrote: 

  
  
  cd: Ouch:-) Hey I have
that picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what was
his name?)with gave us copies to tear up in from of the
Temple-but we didn't do so. Kevin I guess I will Get DavH
off you back for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I
might as well get stated on that:-)So I will be busy for a while-Group
Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some
attention.
  
  
  





-- 
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.




Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Kevin Deegan
Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH?DAVEH: Hmmm again.Sounds like something he learned from SPers.WHAT are you implying DH? Does this come close to a NON BLATANT AD HOM in your eyes?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  That wasn't not done out of respect. DAVEH: Hmm...Do you have any respect for Mormons, Dean?Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH?DAVEH: Hmmm again.Sounds like something he learned from SPers.Would a Mormon High Priest do
 such?DAVEH: None that I know would do such. Hmmm a third time..Perhaps he was a SPer claiming to be MHP. If he was indeed a true Mormon, I believe his actions were inappropriate, and I will apologize to you in his behalf.  However, I dislike drawing conclusions without hearing the his side of the story.Dave you need to learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.DAVEH: That's a mistake I've seen other moderators use as an excuse for improper behavior. Do you believe that separating Judge Dean from Judge More absolves you from responsible behavior? If Judge Dean posts an ad-hom, would not be reasonable to expect Judge More admonish him? If not,
 then would Judge More be practicing a double standard? Perhaps I do have trouble separating the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.when I hear you say something to the effect..Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attentionI pretty much hear Judge More's voice, despite your claim that it is Judge Dean's lips that are moving. I can't see which side of the mouth you are speaking from, Judge Dean. I can only read your words and interpret them as coming
 from one who intends to takeno prisoners.All I meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.DAVEH: You are the one who called me a pagan, Judge Dean. If you wish to refuse to apologize for making that ad-hom remark, and if Judge Moore does not call you on the carpet for posting blatant ad-homs, then would Judge Moore be justified in giving me the boot if I merely referred to Judge Dean's ___(fill in the blank) practices? Your takeno prisoners comment seems to imply TT is not big enough for both of us, Judge Dean. Is that where you want to go with this?  gave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so.DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of respect, Dean.  cd: That wasn't not done out of respect. I just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He told us that Mormons loved the present Prophet (so-called) more then they loved J. Smith-then gave us the picturesthen instructed us to tear them up in front of the Temple. Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH? Would a Mormon High Priest do such?I guess I will Get DavH off you
 backDAVEH: ??? Does that mean you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean? Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't recall saying anything to him recently that would be disrespectful..But if he wants me gone, it is within your power to carry out his wishes.  cd: Dave you need to learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore. All I meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attentionDAVEH: How considerate of you, Judge Dean! I guess I should fee privileged that you are willing to devote all your attention to me to the exclusion of other
 TTers. It does seem a bit selfish though.as you seem to want to smoke all the Ad. Hom. grass yourself!!! Just don't inhale though, as you might choke on it..  =-O   cd: Sound like you also like a good fight-You admitted to provocking me and I am answering your caslling out andI am standing here Mormon-lets get on with it Pagan.Dean Moore wrote: cd: Ouch:-) Hey I have that picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what was his name?)with gave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so. Kevin I guess I
 will Get DavH off you back for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I might as well get stated on that:-)So I will be busy for a while-Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention.--   ~~~  Dave Hansen  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.langlitz.com  ~~~  If you wish to receive  things I find interesting,  I maintain six email lists...  JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,  STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Kevin Deegan
DAVEH: Thanx Kevin. Hmmm...what do you think Judge Dean meant by his comment.I guess I will Get DavH off you back? His below explanation lacks logical credibility, IMO.I don't have my crystal ball handy so I can not discern Deans meaning I guess you would have to ask him. Should I be responsible for everyone elses beliefs now?  Any guess from me would be just that. Do you want me to guess, I can do that if you want.Again I have no desire to see you depart from TT.  Obviously I do not agree with your belief system and am vocal about it as I should be.Someone else put it this way:  "If I should hear a man advocate the erroneous principles he had imbibed through education, and oppose those
 principles, some might imagine that I opposed to that man, when I am opposed to every evil and erroneous principle he advances." - Brigham Young, - Journal of Discourses 7:191 You are always looking for "common ground" I think I can agree with the following:  " If we cannot convince you by reason nor by the word of God that your religion is wrong, we will not persecute you, but will sustain you in the privileges, guaranteed in the Great Charter of American Liberty; we ask from you the generosity - protect us in the exercises of our religious rights - convince us of our errors of doctrine, if we have any, by reason, by logical arguments. or by the word of God, and we will ever be grateful for the information, and you will ever have the pleasing reflection that you have been instruments in the hands of God of redeeming your fellow beings from the darkness which you may see enveloping their minds." - Orson Pratt, The Seer,
 p. 15-16 The Bible says:  Gal 4:16 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?  Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I do not want you gone Dave.DAVEH: Thanx Kevin. Hmmm...what do you think Judge Dean meant by his comment.I guess I will Get DavH off you back? His below explanation lacks logical credibility, IMO.Ido not complain about youDAVEH: From Dean's previous comment.I guess I will Get DavH off you back...
 it seemed as though the Judge was implying you were bothered by my presence on TT. If that is not the case, I appreciate the clarification.You have no problem with the draconian rules of your leaders?DAVEH: Do you have any problems with the draconian rules of the Bible, Kevin? The Lord gave the Law, and how well we keep it is somewhat a measure of our love for him. Do you see it the same way, Kevin?Kevin Deegan wrote: I do not want you gone Dave.  Please don't misrepresent me I have never said or implied such I am not a pope protestant or potentate!  Banishment and worse is a Popish - Protestant distinctive!  This is in their belief system  I have told you before I am not of the RC nor their offspring the protestants!  I do not chase people down the street come
 over here Mormon. Repent or else I will...  I will preach but if you are offended plug you ears and avert youe eyes as I have previouslt stated on this forum  The Supreme court has said the same.  I believe in freedom of speech AND conscience.  I have no desire to enforce my beliefs on you.  I have a desire as the scriptures speak, that God willgive you aheart of flesh and eternal life.Ido not complain about you  I hardly know you!  Iam agains t certain beliefs, that does not mean we could not be friends and still disagree STRONGLY. Ask myLDS friendsO I left out POTENTATES such as Hinckley  The thinking has been done according to your leaders ya know.  You have no problem with the draconian rules of your leaders?Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:- Original Message - From: Dave Hansen   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: 3/9/2006 3:58:51 AM   Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinngave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so.DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of respect, Dean.  cd: That wasn't not done out of respect. I just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He told us that Mormons loved the present Prophet (so-called) more then they loved J. Smith-then gave us the picturesthen instructed us to tear them up in front of the Temple. Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH? Would a Mormon High Priest do such?I
 guess I will Get DavH off you backDAVEH: ??? Does that mean you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean? Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't recall saying anything to him recently that would be disrespectful..But if he wants me gone, it is within your power to carry out his wishes.  cd: Dave you need to learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore. All I meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attentionDAVEH: How considerate of you, Judge Dean! I g

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Dave Hansen




Does this come close to a NON BLATANT AD HOM in your eyes?

DAVEH: Naw.It's just an observation, Kevin. Why do think it is an
ad-hom? Did you feel a twinge of guilt when reading it? I would be
very surprised if a SPers such as I imagine DavidM to be would fee
guilty, as I can't imagine him using simular tactics.  But if it
struck a sensitive nerve with youwell, I suppose I wouldn't be
surprised. However Kevin, I really don't know you very well. Do you
feel comfortable with SPers who do such, or use other demeaning tactics
such as waving underwear?

Kevin Deegan wrote:

  Sure sounded like a set up to
me? You agree DaveH?
  
  DAVEH: Hmmm again.Sounds like
something he learned from SPers.
  
  WHAT are you implying DH? Does this come close to a NON
BLATANT AD HOM in your eyes?
  
  Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  That wasn't not done out of
respect. 

DAVEH: Hmm...Do you have any respect for Mormons, Dean?

Sure sounded like a
set up to me? You agree DaveH?

DAVEH: Hmmm again.Sounds like something he learned from SPers.

Would a Mormon High
Priest do such?

DAVEH: None that I know would do such. Hmmm a third
time..Perhaps he was a SPer claiming to be MHP. If he was indeed a
true Mormon, I believe his actions were inappropriate, and I will
apologize to you in his behalf.  However, I dislike drawing
conclusions without hearing the his side of the story.

Dave you need to
learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.

DAVEH: That's a mistake I've seen other moderators use as an excuse
for improper behavior. Do you believe that separating Judge Dean from Judge More
absolves you from responsible behavior? If Judge Dean posts an ad-hom,
would not be reasonable to expect Judge More admonish
him? If not, then would Judge
More be practicing a double standard?

 Perhaps I do have trouble separating the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.when
I hear you say something to the effect..

Group Please
keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention

I pretty much hear Judge
More's voice, despite your claim that it is
Judge Dean's lips that are moving. I can't see which side of the mouth
you are speaking from, Judge Dean. I can only read your words and
interpret them a s coming from one who intends to takeno prisoners.

All
I meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.

DAVEH: You are the one who called me a pagan, Judge Dean. If you
wish to refuse to apologize for making that ad-hom remark, and if Judge
Moore does not call you on the carpet for posting blatant ad-homs, then
would Judge Moore be justified in giving me the boot if I merely
referred to Judge Dean's ___(fill in the blank) practices? Your takeno
prisoners comment seems to imply TT
is not big enough for both of us, Judge Dean. Is that where you want
to go with this?


  
gave us copies to
tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so.

DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of
respect, Dean.
cd: That wasn't not done
out of respect. I just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He
told us that Mormons loved the present Prophet (so-called) more then
they loved J. Smith-then gave us the picturesthen instructed us to
tear them up in front of the Temple. Sure sounded like a set up to
me? You agree DaveH? Would a Mormon High Priest do such?

I guess I will Get DavH
off you back

DAVEH: ??? Does that mean you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean?
Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't
recall saying anything to him recently that would be
disrespectful..But if he wants me gone, it is within your power to
carry out his wishes.
cd: Dave you need to
learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore. All
I meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.

Group Please keep off the
Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention

DAVEH: How considerate of you, Judge Dean! I guess I should fee
privileged that you are willing to devote all your attention to me to
the exclusion of other TTers. It does seem a bit selfish though.as
you seem to want to smoke all the Ad.
Hom. grass yourself!!! Just don't inhale though,
as you might choke on it..  =-O

cd:
Sound like you also like a good fight-You admitted to provocking me and
I am answering your caslling out andI am standing here Mormon-lets get
on with it Pagan.

Dean Moore wrote: 

  
  
  cd: Ouch:-) Hey I
have that picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what
was his name?)with gave us copies to tear up in from of the
Temple-but we didn't do so. Kevin I gue ss I will Get DavH
off you back for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I
might as well get 

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Kevin Deegan
Guilt? What would give you such thoughts?Titus Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.  Notice it is persons that are defiled not their thoughts/beliefs.  It is people that are cast into HELL not their beliefs!Do you feel comfortable with SPers who do such, or use other demeaning tactics such as waving underwear?  Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them.Jesus taught that those that are offended have no root in themselves MT 13:21 and can not endure.  Are you saying Mormons are ABOVE REPROACH?  Pr 15:10 Correction is
 grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die.  2 Tim 4:2-4 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.  1 Jn 3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.  Pr 27:5 Open rebuke is better than secret love.We are told in the Book of Jude to
 contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.  Amos 3:3 Can two walk together, except they be agreed?  Lu 12:51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division  Pr 28:4 They that forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them  Jn 9:39 And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind.  Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Does this come close to a NON BLATANT AD HOM in your eyes?DAVEH: Naw.It's just an observation, Kevin. Why do think it is an ad-hom? Did you
 feel a twinge of guilt when reading it? I would be very surprised if a SPers such as I imagine DavidM to be would fee guilty, as I can't imagine him using simular tactics.  But if it struck a sensitive nerve with youwell, I suppose I wouldn't be surprised. However Kevin, I really don't know you very well. Do you feel comfortable with SPers who do such, or use other demeaning tactics such as waving underwear?Kevin Deegan wrote: Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH?DAVEH: Hmmm again.Sounds like something he learned from SPers.WHAT are you implying DH? Does this come close to a NON BLATANT AD HOM in your eyes?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  That wasn't not done out of respect. DAVEH: Hmm...Do you have any respect for Mormons, Dean?Sure sounded like a set up to me? You agree DaveH?DAVEH: Hmmm again.Sounds like something he learned from SPers.Would a Mormon High Priest do such?DAVEH: None that I know would do such. Hmmm a third time..Perhaps he was a SPer claiming to be MHP. If he was indeed a true Mormon, I believe his actions were inappropriate, and I will apologize to you in his behalf.  However, I dislike
 drawing conclusions without hearing the his side of the story.Dave you need to learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.DAVEH: That's a mistake I've seen other moderators use as an excuse for improper behavior. Do you believe that separating Judge Dean from Judge More absolves you from responsible behavior? If Judge Dean posts an ad-hom, would not be reasonable to expect Judge More admonish him? If not, then would Judge More be practicing a double standard? Perhaps I do have trouble separating the
 Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.when I hear you say something to the effect..Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attentionI pretty much hear Judge More's voice, despite your claim that it is Judge Dean's lips that are moving. I can't see which side of the mouth you are speaking from, Judge Dean. I can only read your words and interpret them a s coming from one who intends to takeno prisoners.All I meant was that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners
 debate.DAVEH: You are the one who called me a pagan, Judge Dean. If you wish to refuse to apologize for making that ad-hom remark, and if Judge Moore does not call you on the carpet for posting blatant ad-homs, then would Judge Moore be justified in giving me the boot if I merely referred to Judge Dean's ___(fill in the blank) practices? Your takeno prisoners comment seems to imply TT is not big enough for both of us, Judge Dean. Is that where you want to go with this?  gave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do
 so.DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of respect, Dean.  cd: That wasn't not done out of respect. I just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He told us that Mormons loved the 

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Dave Hansen




Guilt? What would give you such thoughts?

DAVEH: Is that not one of the possibilities to consider when a person
seems seems sensitive to an issue? I can't imagine DavidM being
sensitive to what I said about SPers, yet you seemed to consider my
comment an ad-hom.why? Your name wasn't mentioned. Not even was a
specific action mentioned. Yet it appeared as though you identified
with something underlying. Makes me wonder what makes you tick,
KevinDo you really think my speculative comment constitutes an
ad-hom? If sospecifically to whom is the ad-hom against?

Kevin Deegan wrote:

  Guilt? What would give you such thoughts?
  
  Titus Unto the pure all things are
pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing
pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
  
Notice it is persons that are defiled not their thoughts/beliefs.
  It is people that are cast into HELL not their beliefs!
  
  Do you feel comfortable with SPers who
do such, or use other demeaning tactics such as waving underwear?
  
  Great peace have they which love thy law:
and nothing shall offend them.
  
  Jesus taught that those that are offended have no root in
themselves MT 13:21 and can not endure.
  Are you saying Mormons are ABOVE REPROACH?
  Pr 15:10 Correction
i s grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth
reproof shall die.
  2 Tim 4:2-4 Preach the word; be instant in
season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort
with all longsuffering and doctrine.For the time will come when they
will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they
heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn
away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
  1 Jn 3:8 He that committeth sin is of the
devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the
Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
  Pr 27:5 Open rebuke is better than secret
love.
  
  We are told in the
Book of Jude to contend for the faith
which was once delivered unto the saints.
  Amos 3:3 Can two walk together, except
they be agreed?
  Lu 12:51 Suppose ye that I am come to give
peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division
  Pr 28:4 They that forsake the law praise
the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them
  Jn 9:39 And Jesus said, For judgment I am
come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they
which see might be made blind.
  
  Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Does
this come close to a NON BLATANT AD HOM in your eyes?

DAVEH: Naw.It's just an observation, Kevin. Why do think it is an
ad-hom? Did you feel a twinge of guilt when reading it? I would be
very surprised if a SPers such as I imagine DavidM to be would fee
guilty, as I can't imagine him using simular tactics.  But if it
struck a sensitive nerve with youwell, I suppose I wouldn't be
surprised. However Kevin, I really don't know you very well. Do you
feel comfortable with SPers who do such, or use other demeaning tactics
such as waving underwear?

Kevin Deegan wrote:

  Sure sounded like a set up
to me? You agree DaveH?
  
  DAVEH: Hmmm again.Sounds like
something he learned from SPers.
  
  WHAT are you implying DH? Does this come close to a NON
BLATANT AD HOM in your eyes?
  
  Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  That wasn't not done out of
respect. 

DAVEH: Hmm...Do you have any respect for Mormons, Dean?

Sure sounded
like a set up to me? You agree DaveH?

DAVEH: Hmmm again.Sounds like something he learned from SPers.

Would a Mormon
High Priest do such?

DAVEH: None that I know would do such. Hmmm a third
time..Perhaps he was a SPer claiming to be MHP. If he was indeed a
true Mormon, I believe his actions were inappropriate, and I will
apologize to you in his behalf.  However, I disl ike drawing
conclusions without hearing the his side of the story.

Dave you need
to learn to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.

DAVEH: That's a mistake I've seen other moderators use as an excuse
for improper behavior. Do you believe that separating Judge Dean from Judge More
absolves you from responsible behavior? If Judge Dean posts an ad-hom,
would not be reasonable to expect Judge More admonish
him? If not, then would Judge
More be practicing a double standard?

 Perhaps I do have trouble separating the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore.when
I hear you say something to the effect..

Group
Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some
attention

I pretty much hear Judge
More's voice, despite your claim that it is
Judge Dean's lips that are moving. I can't see which side of the mouth
you are speaking from, Judge Dean. I can only read your words and
interpret them a s coming from one who 

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-09 Thread Dave Hansen
:51 AM 
  Subject:
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn
  
  
  
  
  gave us copies to
tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so.
  
  DAVEH: Thank you for that measure of
respect, Dean.
  cd: That wasn't not done
out of respect. I just don't like being set up/used by Mormons.He told
us that Mormons loved the present Prophet (so-called) more then they
loved J. Smith-then gave us the picturesthen instructed us to tear
them up in front of the Temple. Sure sounded like a set up to me? You
agree DaveH? Would a Mormon High Priest do such?
  
  I guess I will Get
DavH off you back
  
DAVEH: ??? Does that mean you have your finger on the EXECUTE DavH button, Judge Dean?
Has Kevin been complaining about me bothering him lately? I don't
recall saying anything to him recently that would be
disrespectful..But if he wants me gone, it is within your power to
carry out his wishes.
  cd: Dave you need to learn
to separate the Moderator "Judge More" from Dean Moore. All I meant was
that we are headed to our usual takeno prisoners debate.
  
  Group Please keep off
the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention
  
DAVEH: How considerate of you, Judge Dean! I guess I should fee pr
ivileged that you are willing to devote all your attention to me to the
exclusion of other TTers. It does seem a bit selfish though.as you
seem to want to smoke all the Ad.
Hom. grass yourself!!! Just don't inhale though,
as you might choke on it..  =-O
  
  cd:
Sound like you also like a good fight-You admitted to provocking me and
I am answering your caslling out andI am standing here Mormon-lets get
on with it Pagan.
  
Dean Moore wrote: 
  


cd: Ouch:-) Hey I
have that picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what
was his name?)with gave us c opies to tear up in from of the
Temple-but we didn't do so . Kevin I guess I will Get DavH
off you back for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I
might as well get stated on that:-)So I will be busy for a while-Group
Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some
attention.



  
  
  

  






Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-08 Thread Lance Muir



Who, pray tell, is the 'other snake 
handler'?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kevin 
  Deegan 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 08, 2006 06:58
  Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of 
  Hinn
  
  Just another snake handler and again the proof is in the pudding!
  
  he who has ears
  http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/tbn.htmLance 
  Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  



IFF he (BH) did say that then, he is. I'd like 
to hear from DM on this one. He has come to Hinn's defence 
often.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kevin Deegan 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 08, 2006 06:41
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of 
  Hinn
  
  http://www.cultlink.com/ar/hinnfalse.htm
  benny is a False prophet in 1989 at Orlando Christian Center he 
  prohesied:
  
  "The Lord also tells me to tell you in mid 90s -- about '94 or '95, 
  no later than that -- God will destroy the homosexual community of America 
  . . . He will destroy it with fire."
  
  "The Spirit of God tells me -- an earthquake will hit the East Coast 
  of America and destroy much in the 90s."
  
  "The Spirit tells me -- Fidel Castro will die in the 90s. . . Holy 
  Spirit just said to me, it'll be worse than any death you can 
  imagine."
  
  __Do You 
  Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 
  
  
  Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New 
  PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. 
  __Do You 
  Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 


Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-08 Thread Kevin Deegan
THE other?  "another"  see dictionary for distinctionor do you want more names?  Gordon B HinckleyLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Who, pray tell, is the 'other snake handler'?- Original Message -   From: Kevin Deegan   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org   Sent: March 08, 2006 06:58  Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of HinnJust another snake handler and again the proof is in the pudding!he who has ears  http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/tbn.htmLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  IFF he (BH) did say that then, he is. I'd like to hear from DM on this one. He has come to Hinn's defence often.- Original Message -   From: Kevin Deegan   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org   Sent: March 08, 2006 06:41  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinnhttp://www.cultlink.com/ar/hinnfalse.htm  benny is a False
 prophet in 1989 at Orlando Christian Center he prohesied:"The Lord also tells me to tell you in mid 90s -- about '94 or '95, no later than that -- God will destroy the homosexual community of America . . . He will destroy it with fire.""The Spirit of God tells me -- an earthquake will hit the East Coast of America and destroy much in the 90s.""The Spirit tells me -- Fidel Castro will die in the 90s. . . Holy Spirit just said to me, it'll be worse than any death you can imagine."__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com   Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a
 breeze.   __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 
		Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 

		Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 


Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-08 Thread Lance Muir



I agree with you once again. (another 
agreement)

PS:DH:Would you concur that should your 'prophet', 
in reality, NOT be a prophet of God then, he must be designated 'a false 
prophet'?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kevin 
  Deegan 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 08, 2006 07:19
  Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: 
  [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn
  
  THE other?
  "another"
  see dictionary for distinction
  
  or do you want more names?
  Gordon B Hinckley
  
  Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  

Who, pray tell, is the 'other snake 
handler'?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kevin Deegan 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 08, 2006 06:58
  Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] 
  spirit of Hinn
  
  Just another snake handler and again the proof is in the 
  pudding!
  
  he who has ears
  http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/tbn.htmLance 
  Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  



IFF he (BH) did say that then, he is. I'd 
like to hear from DM on this one. He has come to Hinn's defence 
often.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kevin Deegan 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: March 08, 2006 06:41
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] spirit 
  of Hinn
  
  http://www.cultlink.com/ar/hinnfalse.htm
  benny is a False prophet in 1989 at Orlando Christian Center 
  he prohesied:
  
  "The Lord also tells me to tell you in mid 90s -- about '94 or 
  '95, no later than that -- God will destroy the homosexual community 
  of America . . . He will destroy it with fire."
  
  "The Spirit of God tells me -- an earthquake will hit the East 
  Coast of America and destroy much in the 90s."
  
  "The Spirit tells me -- Fidel Castro will die in the 90s. . . 
  Holy Spirit just said to me, it'll be worse than any death you can 
  imagine."
  
  __Do You 
  Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection 
  around http://mail.yahoo.com 
  
  
  Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New 
  PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. 
  __Do You 
  Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 
  
  
  Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New 
  PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. 
  
  
  Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New 
  PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. 


Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

2006-03-08 Thread Dean Moore



cd: Ouch:-) Hey I have that picture in mutli's-The High Priest that Ruben hung out (what was his name?)with gave us copies to tear up in from of the Temple-but we didn't do so. Kevin I guess I will Get DavH off you back for a while as soon as David shows of-or better yet I might as well get stated on that:-)So I will be busy for a while-Group Please keep off the Ad. Hom. grass so I can give the "Provoker" some attention.




- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Deegan 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/8/2006 7:20:00 AM 
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

THE other?
"another"
see dictionary for distinction

or do you want more names?
Gordon B Hinckley

Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Who, pray tell, is the 'other snake handler'?

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Deegan 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Sent: March 08, 2006 06:58
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

Just another snake handler and again the proof is in the pudding!

he who has ears
http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/tbn.htmLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




IFF he (BH) did say that then, he is. I'd like to hear from DM on this one. He has come to Hinn's defence often.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Deegan 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Sent: March 08, 2006 06:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn

http://www.cultlink.com/ar/hinnfalse.htm
benny is a False prophet in 1989 at Orlando Christian Center he prohesied:

"The Lord also tells me to tell you in mid 90s -- about '94 or '95, no later than that -- God will destroy the homosexual community of America . . . He will destroy it with fire."

"The Spirit of God tells me -- an earthquake will hit the East Coast of America and destroy much in the 90s."

"The Spirit tells me -- Fidel Castro will die in the 90s. . . Holy Spirit just said to me, it'll be worse than any death you can imagine."

__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 


Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. 
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 


Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. 


Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.