Re: [Unattended] possible bug in linux bootdisk, master script?

2004-08-27 Thread John . Edmiston
I too am seeing this message from the 4.4b linuxboot cd.

After overriding defaults, hitting enter to keep the install source the
same, putting in my username and password

Trying smbmount \\ntinstall\install /z -o ttl=60,username=installer,ro
connection to ntinstaller failed
SMB connection failed
*** smbmount did not work
*** Trying mount.cifs \\ntinstall\install /z -o
ttl=60,username=installer,ro
mount error: could not find target server.  TCP name ntinstall/install not
found
rc=4
*** Failed to mount /z. Retrying...

I tried your suggestion

Z_PATH='\\ntinstall\install'
  smbmount $Z_PATH /z -o ttl=60,username=guest,ro

and received the message

Connection to ntinstall failed
SMB connection failed


The Unattended 3.5 dos boot cd works with this same machine using the e100b
driver.


Tft Tco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 so i was checking the script, it actually does the following command:
 smbmount \\myserver.local\install /z -o ttl=60,username=geust,ro

Not exactly.  The master script does:

  smbmount $Z_PATH /z -o ttl=60,$mount_opts

...which is not the same.

A more accurate manual simulation would be:

  Z_PATH='\\ntinstall\install'
  smbmount $Z_PATH /z -o ttl=60,username=guest,ro

Assuming this still works, please try:

  more /z/dosbin/install.pl

If that fails, we can debug from there.  If it succeeds, then we have
a bit of a mystery.

In the next release, we will produce slightly better diagnostics for
these sorts of failures.

 - Pat



John A. Edmiston
Information Systems Analyst
Plant Performance Services
Voice918.246.6226
Fax 918.245.8812
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review,
retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any
action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
material from any computer.  Any views expressed in this message
are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect 
the views of the company.  
---



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] possible bug in linux bootdisk, master script?

2004-08-27 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I too am seeing this message from the 4.4b linuxboot cd.

Your error is slightly different:

 *** Trying mount.cifs \\ntinstall\install /z -o
 ttl=60,username=installer,ro
 mount error: could not find target server.  TCP name ntinstall/install not
 found

This means the boot disk was unable to resolve the host name
ntinstall.

Our DOS boot disk uses NetBIOS name resolution (WINS, broadcast),
while our Linux boot disk uses DNS.  So it is possible for one to work
where the other fails.  Maybe I will change this in the next
release...  But meanwhile, either get DNS working or use the server's
IP address instead of its name.

 - Pat


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] possible bug in linux bootdisk, master script?

2004-08-26 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Tft Tco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 so i was checking the script, it actually does the following command:
 smbmount \\myserver.local\install /z -o ttl=60,username=geust,ro

Not exactly.  The master script does:

  smbmount $Z_PATH /z -o ttl=60,$mount_opts

...which is not the same.

A more accurate manual simulation would be:

  Z_PATH='\\ntinstall\install'
  smbmount $Z_PATH /z -o ttl=60,username=guest,ro

Assuming this still works, please try:

  more /z/dosbin/install.pl

If that fails, we can debug from there.  If it succeeds, then we have
a bit of a mystery.

In the next release, we will produce slightly better diagnostics for
these sorts of failures.

 - Pat


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] possible bug in linux bootdisk, master script?

2004-08-26 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 10:23:40PM +0200, Tft Tco wrote:
 I just tried the linux bootdisk with unattended 4.4b.
 it worked until the script wanted to mount the install share. that was the 
 point when it said:
 *** Trying smbmount \\myserver.local\install /z -o 
 ttl=60,username=geust,ro
 *** smbmount did not work
 
 so i was checking the script, it actually does the following command:
 smbmount \\myserver.local\install /z -o ttl=60,username=geust,ro
 
 if I type that in - either in linuxboot disk bash or on any other available 
 linux here, I get the info page from smbmount (wrong parameters)
 
 when I change the double quotes () into single quotes (') however, the 
 whole thing seems to work - at least when I run the command by hand. I 
 didn't try to make my own bootdisk yet.
 smbmount '\\myserver.local\install' /z -o ttl=60,username=geust,ro

I would suggest that the backslashes are being interpreted by your shell,
which means that by the time smbmount sees them, it looks like this:

smbmount \myserver.localnstall /z -o ttl=60,username=geust,ro

(modulo any shell expansion of \i, which will almost certainly not produce
\i...)

This is supported by the fact that single quotes makes everything OK,
because single-quotes are usually interpreted as leave whatever is in here
right the hell alone, shell -- are you listening to me shell?  Dammit,
listen!  smack and so on.

Switching backslashes for forwardslashes would work, as would doubling the
slashes, or switching double-quotes for single-quotes.

I could have sworn that the install script did one of these all by itself. 
Certainly I haven't come up against the problem.

- Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature