Sending unicode with pid
Hi, I'm trying to send a message using the cgi-bin interface. When I try to send to a SIM client, I use: .pid=0mclass=2. And it works (and is received by the SIM application). But when I try to send a Unicode message (.pid=0mclass=2coding=2.), the kannel says it's Accepted for delivery but the messages arrives to the SMS inbox rather than the SIM. I also tried mclass=3, and charset=(all kinds of charsets). Any one knows anything about this? Thanks.
Re: PDU decoding
you write contruct wap push like this 55010C9126582602680800F5A75A0605040B8423F001060403AE81EA02056A0045C60D0378797A0 08503656D61696C2F3132332F6162632E776D6C000AC3071999062515231510C304209906030103 596F7520686176652034206E657720652D6D61696C73000101 that i want to ask is 55010C9126582602680800F5A75A06 where it come from? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PDU-decoding-tf4759916.html#a13722672 Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
DLR TLVs
Hi All, I am looking for a way to extract a specific TLV from a DLR message. Where are the %escapes defined for the DLR URL? Kyriacos -- Kyriacos Sakkas Development Team Netsmart Tel: + 357 22 452565 Fax: + 357 22 452566 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netsmart.com.cy Taking Business to a New Level! ** Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email message is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message in error, please email the sender at [EMAIL PROTECTED] **
Re: PDU decoding
Please take a look at GSM 03.40 55010C9126582602680800F5A75A06 is TP_MTI, TP-DA, and others before TP-UD On Nov 13, 2007 5:48 PM, Aditya M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you write contruct wap push like this 55010C9126582602680800F5A75A0605040B8423F001060403AE81EA02056A0045C60D0378797A0 08503656D61696C2F3132332F6162632E776D6C000AC3071999062515231510C304209906030103 596F7520686176652034206E657720652D6D61696C73000101 that i want to ask is 55010C9126582602680800F5A75A06 where it come from? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PDU-decoding-tf4759916.html#a13722672 Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Regards, Ady Wicaksono Email: ady.wicaksono at gmail.com http://adywicaksono.wordpress.com/
Re: DLR TLVs
Hi Kyriacos! Alexander Malysh created an SMPP Optional Parameters patch. You have already participated on that thread: http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH--SMPP-Optional-Parameters-t4223169.html The other day I tested it, and found that nothing came back with %D I sent e-mail to the devel list, and Alexander replied that he had missed something and sent a new patch very quick, which you'll find on that thread: meta_data.diff.gz With that new patch, you can receive your meta-data back on %D Now, it only gets vendor specific TLVs. In my case I also need to get info from some SMPP specs defined TLVs, which don't come with %D. Alexander said the patch could be expanded to do so, and that he would try to look at it on his spare time. Alexander, did you have any chance to look at this? Thanks again!!! :) Juan On Nov 13, 2007 8:00 AM, Kyriacos Sakkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am looking for a way to extract a specific TLV from a DLR message. Where are the %escapes defined for the DLR URL? Kyriacos -- Kyriacos Sakkas Development Team Netsmart Tel: + 357 22 452565 Fax: + 357 22 452566 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netsmart.com.cy Taking Business to a New Level! ** Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email message is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message in error, please email the sender at [EMAIL PROTECTED] **
SMSC_AT Capture Calling number
Hi This might not be an kannel specific question but think some of you might come to the same issue. We are using modems as SMSC using smsc_at module. We have noticed that some people call to the modem number when receiving an sms from the modem since with modem connections it is not possible to override the sender number. Kannel, when detecting a call (ring), does drop the call inmediately and that is ok; however, what we would like to do is to reccord or show in the debug log the caller id so we can keep a reccord of those numbers for post_processing and follow up. Is this possible? how? Regards, Alvaro
Re: K700i bluetooth connection
Hi Philip. Did you manage to make this phone work ? I got one working with kannel, sending and receiving SMS's. Let me know, maybe I can help you. An IRC channel for kannel ( #kannel ) exists on freenode, haven't sen many people there, but i'm in. Regards. Philip Ankunda wrote: Hi all,have checked the forum for help on this. I have connected kannel with my Sony Ericsson K700i but keep getting this error(see below). Have tried setting read permissions for the file with chmod 664 and even chmod 777. Please help. Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/K700i-bluetooth-connection-tf4155836.html#a13734687 Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
modem throughput
I know this has been asked before in one way or another but I didn't notice any definitive answers. My questions is this - WITHOUT using any special equipment and any optimizations to the generic kannel, what's a reasonable SMS throughput that I can expect. Some people earlier gave numbers as high as 500sms/sec, others said no more than 20sms/min. I have a quad-band Wavecom GSM modem and fairly powerful hardware (i.e. dual CPU machine with lots of RAM, which I don't think would be the bottleneck anyway). My provider is T-Mobile in the US, and I am just inserting a SIM from phone into the modem. So, comments welcome and please specify your setup. Once again, I am not looking for responses like yeah we get 500sms/sec with proprietary software, 5 modems, etc. I need to hear about people's experiences using vanilla Kannel setup, reasonable hardware, and a modem similar to Wavecom. Thanks in advance.
Re: modem throughput
Hi Haidut, I am using wavecom GSM modems made by MultiTech on ATT pre-paid SIM cards in the US. I usually get 12-20 sms/minute. Nathan Haidut wrote: I know this has been asked before in one way or another but I didn't notice any definitive answers. My questions is this - WITHOUT using any special equipment and any optimizations to the generic kannel, what's a reasonable SMS throughput that I can expect. Some people earlier gave numbers as high as 500sms/sec, others said no more than 20sms/min. I have a quad-band Wavecom GSM modem and fairly powerful hardware (i.e. dual CPU machine with lots of RAM, which I don't think would be the bottleneck anyway). My provider is T-Mobile in the US, and I am just inserting a SIM from phone into the modem. So, comments welcome and please specify your setup. Once again, I am not looking for responses like yeah we get 500sms/sec with proprietary software, 5 modems, etc. I need to hear about people's experiences using vanilla Kannel setup, reasonable hardware, and a modem similar to Wavecom. Thanks in advance.
Re: modem throughput
OK, thanks. Anybody else have throughput experience to share? On Nov 13, 2007 4:35 PM, Nathan Ferris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Haidut, I am using wavecom GSM modems made by MultiTech on ATT pre-paid SIM cards in the US. I usually get 12-20 sms/minute. Nathan Haidut wrote: I know this has been asked before in one way or another but I didn't notice any definitive answers. My questions is this - WITHOUT using any special equipment and any optimizations to the generic kannel, what's a reasonable SMS throughput that I can expect. Some people earlier gave numbers as high as 500sms/sec, others said no more than 20sms/min. I have a quad-band Wavecom GSM modem and fairly powerful hardware (i.e. dual CPU machine with lots of RAM, which I don't think would be the bottleneck anyway). My provider is T-Mobile in the US, and I am just inserting a SIM from phone into the modem. So, comments welcome and please specify your setup. Once again, I am not looking for responses like yeah we get 500sms/sec with proprietary software, 5 modems, etc. I need to hear about people's experiences using vanilla Kannel setup, reasonable hardware, and a modem similar to Wavecom. Thanks in advance.
Re: SMSC_AT Capture Calling number
Hi, you would need to patch kannel AT smsc to dump the MSISDN before to drop the call. Other software cannot open the modem device in same time when its used by kannel without breaking the kannel process. I have used years ago zyneo SMS gateway. They do dump the call info while processing the MT traffic. But, this takes several seconds /1-2-3/ to be done, so consider slower performance. cheers seik -Original Message- From: Alvaro Cornejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2007 ?. To: seik Subject:SMSC_AT Capture Calling number Hi This might not be an kannel specific question but think some of you might come to the same issue. We are using modems as SMSC using smsc_at module. We have noticed that some people call to the modem number when receiving an sms from the modem since with modem connections it is not possible to override the sender number. Kannel, when detecting a call (ring), does drop the call inmediately and that is ok; however, what we would like to do is to reccord or show in the debug log the caller id so we can keep a reccord of those numbers for post_processing and follow up. Is this possible? how? Regards, Alvaro
Re[2]: modem throughput
Wavecom here, its nothing to do with the CPU or kannel optimization. the traffic rates depend on the mobile network. here the average speed is 6-9 seconds per SMS, and if you request dlr reporting, it will take up to 13-17 seconds per SMS 500 sms/sec per modem ... :) .. it should be ss7 modem, not GSM modem. -Original Message- From: Haidut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2007 ?. To: seikath Subject:modem throughput OK, thanks. Anybody else have throughput experience to share? On Nov 13, 2007 4:35 PM, Nathan Ferris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Haidut, I am using wavecom GSM modems made by MultiTech on ATT pre-paid SIM cards in the US. I usually get 12-20 sms/minute. Nathan Haidut wrote: I know this has been asked before in one way or another but I didn't notice any definitive answers. My questions is this - WITHOUT using any special equipment and any optimizations to the generic kannel, what's a reasonable SMS throughput that I can expect. Some people earlier gave numbers as high as 500sms/sec, others said no more than 20sms/min. I have a quad-band Wavecom GSM modem and fairly powerful hardware (i.e. dual CPU machine with lots of RAM, which I don't think would be the bottleneck anyway). My provider is T-Mobile in the US, and I am just inserting a SIM from phone into the modem. So, comments welcome and please specify your setup. Once again, I am not looking for responses like yeah we get 500sms/sec with proprietary software, 5 modems, etc. I need to hear about people's experiences using vanilla Kannel setup, reasonable hardware, and a modem similar to Wavecom. Thanks in advance.
Re: Re[2]: modem throughput
Hi I get about the same numbers (9-12 seg/msg) for MT messages, does anyone have numbers for incomming messages? On Nov 13, 2007 4:21 PM, seikath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wavecom here, its nothing to do with the CPU or kannel optimization. the traffic rates depend on the mobile network. here the average speed is 6-9 seconds per SMS, and if you request dlr reporting, it will take up to 13-17 seconds per SMS 500 sms/sec per modem ... :) .. it should be ss7 modem, not GSM modem. -Original Message- From: Haidut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2007 ?. To: seikath Subject:modem throughput OK, thanks. Anybody else have throughput experience to share? On Nov 13, 2007 4:35 PM, Nathan Ferris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Haidut, I am using wavecom GSM modems made by MultiTech on ATT pre-paid SIM cards in the US. I usually get 12-20 sms/minute. Nathan Haidut wrote: I know this has been asked before in one way or another but I didn't notice any definitive answers. My questions is this - WITHOUT using any special equipment and any optimizations to the generic kannel, what's a reasonable SMS throughput that I can expect. Some people earlier gave numbers as high as 500sms/sec, others said no more than 20sms/min. I have a quad-band Wavecom GSM modem and fairly powerful hardware (i.e. dual CPU machine with lots of RAM, which I don't think would be the bottleneck anyway). My provider is T-Mobile in the US, and I am just inserting a SIM from phone into the modem. So, comments welcome and please specify your setup. Once again, I am not looking for responses like yeah we get 500sms/sec with proprietary software, 5 modems, etc. I need to hear about people's experiences using vanilla Kannel setup, reasonable hardware, and a modem similar to Wavecom. Thanks in advance. -- |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com
RE: Re[2]: modem throughput
Hello, I got quite the same pictures, 6 sec per msg for MT. it could depend if you are using the sim memory or the modem one. Regards -Original Message- From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 13 novembre 2007 15:17 To: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: modem throughput Hi I get about the same numbers (9-12 seg/msg) for MT messages, does anyone have numbers for incomming messages? On Nov 13, 2007 4:21 PM, seikath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wavecom here, its nothing to do with the CPU or kannel optimization. the traffic rates depend on the mobile network. here the average speed is 6-9 seconds per SMS, and if you request dlr reporting, it will take up to 13-17 seconds per SMS 500 sms/sec per modem ... :) .. it should be ss7 modem, not GSM modem. -Original Message- From: Haidut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2007 ?. To: seikath Subject:modem throughput OK, thanks. Anybody else have throughput experience to share? On Nov 13, 2007 4:35 PM, Nathan Ferris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Haidut, I am using wavecom GSM modems made by MultiTech on ATT pre-paid SIM cards in the US. I usually get 12-20 sms/minute. Nathan Haidut wrote: I know this has been asked before in one way or another but I didn't notice any definitive answers. My questions is this - WITHOUT using any special equipment and any optimizations to the generic kannel, what's a reasonable SMS throughput that I can expect. Some people earlier gave numbers as high as 500sms/sec, others said no more than 20sms/min. I have a quad-band Wavecom GSM modem and fairly powerful hardware (i.e. dual CPU machine with lots of RAM, which I don't think would be the bottleneck anyway). My provider is T-Mobile in the US, and I am just inserting a SIM from phone into the modem. So, comments welcome and please specify your setup. Once again, I am not looking for responses like yeah we get 500sms/sec with proprietary software, 5 modems, etc. I need to hear about people's experiences using vanilla Kannel setup, reasonable hardware, and a modem similar to Wavecom. Thanks in advance. -- |--- --| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com _ Antivirus avast! http://www.avast.com : message Sortant sain. Base de donnees virale (VPS) : 071113-1, 13/11/2007 Analyse le : 13/11/2007 16:03:16 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
RE: SMSC_AT Capture Calling number
A more simple solution to drop the call, is to forward all the call to the answer machine inconditionnally and you will not be annoyed ;-) -Original Message- From: seik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 13 novembre 2007 14:13 To: Alvaro Cornejo Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: SMSC_AT Capture Calling number Hi, you would need to patch kannel AT smsc to dump the MSISDN before to drop the call. Other software cannot open the modem device in same time when its used by kannel without breaking the kannel process. I have used years ago zyneo SMS gateway. They do dump the call info while processing the MT traffic. But, this takes several seconds /1-2-3/ to be done, so consider slower performance. cheers seik -Original Message- From: Alvaro Cornejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2007 ?. To: seik Subject:SMSC_AT Capture Calling number Hi This might not be an kannel specific question but think some of you might come to the same issue. We are using modems as SMSC using smsc_at module. We have noticed that some people call to the modem number when receiving an sms from the modem since with modem connections it is not possible to override the sender number. Kannel, when detecting a call (ring), does drop the call inmediately and that is ok; however, what we would like to do is to reccord or show in the debug log the caller id so we can keep a reccord of those numbers for post_processing and follow up. Is this possible? how? Regards, Alvaro _ Antivirus avast! http://www.avast.com : message Sortant sain. Base de donnees virale (VPS) : 071113-1, 13/11/2007 Analyse le : 13/11/2007 16:04:48 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
