RE: Quectel EG25

[info.ubichip]

sorry for the late answer.

 

Issue was on the initial AT command which respond 1 or 0 in place of "OK". The 
modem is working quite well, I need some optimization but it should make it in 
kannel.

 

Thanks again

 

De : Mesbahuddin Malik [mailto:mesbah.ma...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : lundi 16 octobre 2023 16:44
À : info.ubic...@free.fr
Objet : Re: Quectel EG25

 

which OS you are using .By Checking  lsusb  modem  you can check weather you 
get the virtual path if you are using linux/unix  or a have a check with 
http://smstools3.kekekasvi.com/

 

Regards

Mesbah

 

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:19 PM  wrote:

Hello all,

 

Does anyone got some experience and feedback integrating Quectel 4G modems to 
Kannel ? if yes, do you have please the modems file configuration ?

 

Thanks in advance for your help

Quectel EG25

[info.ubichip]

Hello all,

 

Does anyone got some experience and feedback integrating Quectel 4G modems to 
Kannel ? if yes, do you have please the modems file configuration ?

 

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: [RIP] Remembering René Kluwen

[info.ubichip]

RIP Rene - thanks again to your contributions which  were used by many across 
this community and will still be here.

 

Nos sincères condoléances de toute la communauté kannel.

 

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Donald Jackson
Envoyé : vendredi 11 juin 2021 16:36
À : tulip neo
Cc : users; Stipe Tolj; kannel_dev_mailinglist
Objet : Re: [RIP] Remembering René Kluwen

 

RIP Rene - will be truly missed and his contributions were used by many across 
this community.

 

On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 16:27, tulip neo  wrote:

Sorry to hear about this.for some years I was not in touch with Rene but in the 
period of 2005-2010 when ever I triggered any query got immediate response from 
stipe n rene.

Sorry to hear about this.

Can any one let me know what exactly happened.

Regards

Neo

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 

 

 

On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 19:29, Web Services

 wrote:

It's very sad incident 

 

RIP Rane 

 

We will always remember your great contribution

 

On Fri, 11 Jun, 2021, 6:33 pm Stipe Tolj,  wrote:

Dear all,

With deep regret and sorrow we let you know that René Kluwen, one of 
Kannel core developers has passed away this week. René has been a 
wonderful character and person, a father and a long year active 
supporter of the Kannel project. His work contributed to the main 
gateway module, the sqlbox and opensmppbox sub-modules, along with most 
valued discussions in our mailing list groups. Some of us have been 
friends with René and we’re heavily shaken by the news.

We will miss him, and we would like to express our sincerely condolences 
to his family.

Like in the hearts and minds of his family, his persona will keep on 
living in his work he contributed with passion to our project. Honoring 
his contributions is our privilege and determination.

Rest in peace René Kluwen (* 10-05-1970, ✝ 06-06-2021)

https://kannel.org/images/rouwkaart_rene.png


-- 
Best Regards,
Stipe Tolj

---
Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

Kannel Foundation tolj.org system architecture
http://www.kannel.org/http://www.tolj.org/

st...@kannel.org  s...@tolj.org
---




 

-- 

Donald Jackson

RE: DISCARDED SMS / NACK/Retries Exceeded

[info.ubichip]

it looks like the IP is not accepted ?

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Web Min
Envoyé : mardi 25 mai 2021 09:54
À : Mesbahuddin Malik
Cc : kannel users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: DISCARDED SMS / NACK/Retries Exceeded

 

It is already in the SMSC before the host 


allowed-prefix = 1

 

Any Idea please

 

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 4:10 AM Mesbahuddin Malik  
wrote:

Hello,

  where is your allowed prefix in SMSC ?

 

Regards

Mesbah

 

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 7:06 PM Web Min  wrote:

Hello,

 

I've spent a significant amount of time around this issue. I couldn't find any 
solution or hint on why getting DISCARDED SMS as below:

 

2021-05-02 00:25:30 2021-05-02 00:25:30 DISCARDED SMS [SMSC:] [SVC:] [ACT:] 
[BINF:] [FID:26][from:SellerAJ] [to:1946873251] [flags:-1:2:-1:-1:31] [msg:0:] 
[udh:0:]
2021-05-02 00:25:30 2021-05-02 00:25:30 Receive DLR [SMSC:] [SVC:] [ACT:] 
[BINF:] [FID:26][from:SellerAJ] [to:1946873251] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16] 
[msg:12:NACK/no SMSC] [udh:0:]
2021-05-02 00:26:30 2021-05-02 00:25:30 DISCARDED SMS [SMSC:MySMSC] [SVC:] 
[ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:25][from:SellerAJ] [to:1946873251] [flags:-1:2:-1:-1:31] 
[msg:0:] [udh:0:]
2021-05-02 00:26:30 2021-05-02 00:26:30 Receive DLR [SMSC:MySMSC] [SVC:] [ACT:] 
[BINF:] [FID:25][from:SellerAJ] [to:1946873251] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16] 
[msg:21:NACK/Retries Exceeded] [udh:0:]

It is straightforward and it was working well with the same configuration since 
the last incident in STRASBOURG 

I'm connecting to SMPP using MySQL database and routing to the defined SMSC

Kannel --> sqlbox ->  bearerbox -> smsc

Here is the configuration:

kannel.conf

# core
group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13001
wapbox-port = 13002
store-type = spool
store-location = /var/spool/kannel/store
dlr-storage = mysql
box-deny-ip = "*.*.*.*"
box-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1"
sms-resend-freq = 30
sms-resend-retry = 2
sms-incoming-queue-limit = "-1"
sms-outgoing-queue-limit = 999
smsbox-max-pending = 999
log-level=0
log-file = /var/log/kannel/core.log
access-log = /var/log/kannel/access-core.log
access-log-format="%t %l [SMSC:%i] [SVC:%n] [ACT:%A] [BINF:%B] 
[FID:%F][from:%p] [to:%P] [flags:%m:%c:%M:%C:%d] [msg:%L:%b] [udh:%U:%u]"


# dlr setup
group = mysql-connection
id = mydlr
host = localhost
port = 3306
username = root
password = rootpassword
database = my_db
max-connections = 25

# dlr table structure
group = dlr-db
id = mydlr
table = dlr
field-smsc=dlr_smsc
field-timestamp=dlr_timestamp
field-destination=dlr_destination
field-source=dlr_source
field-service=dlr_service
field-url=dlr_url
field-mask=dlr_mask
field-status=dlr_status
field-boxc-id=dlr_boxc_id


# smsbox
group = smsbox
bearerbox-host = localhost
bearerbox-port = 13001
sendsms-port = 13301
global-sender = 001
sendsms-chars = "0123456789+ "
mo-recode = true
http-request-retry = 10
http-queue-delay = 60
immediate-sendsms-reply = true
log-level = 0
log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsbox.log
access-log = /var/log/kannel/access-smsbox.log


group = sendsms-user
default-smsc = MySMSC
forced-smsc = MySMSC
username = user
password = password
max-messages = 1000
concatenation = true

# SMS-SERVICE
group = sms-service
keyword = default
#accept-x-kannel-headers = true
#concatenation = true
#omit-empty = true
#catch-all = true
max-messages = 1000
#text = "Galaxy ROBOT by Zaib"
#get-url = "http://localhost/playsms/index.php?app=call 

 =gateway=kannel=geturl=%t=%q=%a=%Q=%i"


# smsc
group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MySMSC
allowed-smsc-id = MySMSC
preferred-smsc-id = MySMSC
interface-version = 34
allowed-prefix = 1
host = xx.xx.xx.xx
port = 9876
receive-port = 0
smsc-username = smscuser
smsc-password = smscpass
system-type = sysType
source-addr-ton = 5
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 0
dest-addr-npi = 0
keepalive = 600
reconnect-delay = 3
enquire-link-interval = 30
max-pending-submits = 1
log-level = 0
log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsc-transmitter.log
msg-id-type = 0x01
throughput = 50
wait-ack = 240
wait-ack-expire = 0x00

 

Any idea would be appearited.

RE: Slow sms outbox to smsc smpp

[info.ubichip]

hello,

did you try to stress your database by huge query independantly of kannel ?
did you try to use the fake SMSC in kannel tools, to stress your kannel
architecture to see what is the maximum rate ?

it could help find the bug.

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Jose N Figueroa
Envoyé : mardi 25 mai 2021 22:53
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Slow sms outbox to smsc smpp

Hello everybody,


I'm using kannel latest revision  "Kannel bearerbox version svn-r5307M" with

the following scenario:


Smsbox -> Bearerbox -> SMPP SMSC·


I'm using redis as store, but for some strange reason I'm only getting out

about 5 sms/s and even I have 2 or 3 binds (load balancing) to the same SMPP

SMSC, I tried one smsc and the 3 smsc as load balancing already, same
result.

This is the config, I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong:

# CORE
group = core
admin-port = 13000
admin-password = bar
status-password = foo
log-file = /var/log/kannel/kannel.log
log-level = 4
access-log = /var/log/kannel/access.log
smsbox-port = 13001
store-type = redis
#store-location = /var/spool/kannel/store
wdp-interface-name = "*"
smsbox-max-pending = 50
admin-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1"
#box-deny-ip = "*.*.*.*"
box-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1"

# SMSBOX
group = smsbox
bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
bearerbox-port = 13001
sendsms-port = 13131
sendsms-chars = "0123456789+ "
log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsbox.log
log-level = 4
access-log = /var/log/kannel/access.log
mo-recode = true
max-pending-requests = 20


group = redis-connection
id = redis_id
host = localhost
port = 6379
#password = foo
database = 0
max-connections = 40


group = store-db
id = redis_id
table = store1


## SMSC ATT
group=smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = ATT-02
allowed-smsc-id = ATT-02
preferred-smsc-id = ATT-02
host = ""
port = ""
transceiver-mode = 1
smsc-username = ""
smsc-password = ""
system-type = "VMA"
log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsc-ATT-02.log
log-level = 4
throughput=50
max-pending-submits=100
alt-charset = ISO-8859-1
wait-ack = 600

# SMSC ATT - 2
group=smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = ATT-02
allowed-smsc-id = ATT-02
preferred-smsc-id = ATT-02
host = ""
port = ""
transceiver-mode = 1
smsc-username = ""
smsc-password = ""
system-type = "VMA"
log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsc-ATT-02-2.log
log-level = 4
throughput=50
max-pending-submits=100
alt-charset = ISO-8859-1
wait-ack = 600


# SMSC ATT -3 
group=smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = ATT-02
allowed-smsc-id = ATT-02
preferred-smsc-id = ATT-02
host = ""
port = ""
transceiver-mode = 1
smsc-username = ""
smsc-password = ""
system-type = "VMA"
log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsc-ATT-02-3.log
log-level = 4
throughput=50
max-pending-submits=100
alt-charset = ISO-8859-1
wait-ack = 600


# SENDSMS-USER
group = sendsms-user
default-smsc = mayor
username = playsms
password = foobar
max-messages = 50
concatenation = true

# SMS SERVICE
group = sms-service
keyword = default
omit-empty = true
get-url = "https://dns-test/sms/inbound?t=%t=%q=%a=%Q=%i;
catch-all = true


$ curl "http://localhost:13000/status?password=foo;

   Kannel bearerbox version `svn-r5307M'. Build `May 25 2021 17:45:20',
   compiler `4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-36)'. System Linux, release
   3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64, version #1 SMP Tue Jun 18 16:35:19 UTC
   2019, machine x86_64. Hostname sms.test.net, IP 192.168.1.124.
   Libxml version 2.9.1. Using OpenSSL 1.0.2s 28 May 2019. Using hiredis
   API 0.12.1 Using native malloc.

   Status: running, uptime 0d 0h 52m 12s

   WDP: received 0 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued)

   SMS: received 0 (0 queued), sent 25418 (0 queued), store size 186
   SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, outbound (4.47,3.65,8.11)
   msg/sec

   DLR: received 38524, sent 0
   DLR: inbound (4.47,3.91,12.30) msg/sec, outbound (0.00,0.00,0.00)
   msg/sec
   DLR: 12387 queued, using internal storage

   Box connections:
   smsbox:(none), IP 127.0.0.1 (0 queued), (on-line 0d 0h 52m 5s)

   SMSC connections:
   ATT-02[ATT-02]SMPP::***:VMA (online
   3132s, rcvd: sms 0 (0.00,0.00,0.00) / dlr 55 (0.12,0.04,0.02), sent:
   sms 55 (0.12,0.04,0.02) / dlr 0 (0.00,0.00,0.00), failed 0, queued 0
   msgs)
   ATT-02[ATT-02]SMPP::***:VMA (online
   3132s, rcvd: sms 0 (0.00,0.00,0.00) / dlr 6 (0.04,0.01,0.00), sent: sms
   6 (0.04,0.01,0.00) / dlr 0 (0.00,0.00,0.00), failed 0, queued 0 msgs)
   ATT-02[ATT-02]SMPP:***:***:VMA (online
   3132s, rcvd: sms 0 (0.00,0.00,0.00) / dlr 5 (0.02,0.00,0.00), sent: sms
   5 (0.02,0.00,0.00) / dlr 0 (0.00,0.00,0.00), failed 0, queued 0 msgs)


Thanks in advance!

-- 
Jose Figueroa

generic front end for Kannel

[info.ubichip]

Hello all,

I know it is not directly related to kannel, but I'm looking for a
entreprise grade frontend (opensource or licence paid) to use with kannel.
Do someone has some experience with existing system ?

Here are the existing system I know :
- playsms,
- smppcube
- joomla + jeema

Any others ?
Any feedback on them ?

Thanks in advance

RE: How can I push back MO on KSMPPD ?

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

You can use a reroute feature.

 

BR

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Bertrand Dupont
Envoyé : lundi 4 novembre 2019 14:09
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : How can I push back MO on KSMPPD ?

 

Hi all,

 

I need to have an SMPP server to receive customers traffic and I just installed 
KSMPPD wich seems to work perfectly.

 

My problem / question is that I can't figure out how I can push back SMS MO in 
such config. Is it possible ?

And if it is how can I push back the MO in kannel and route it to the correct 
smpp client ?

 

I've try to search but didn't find any example or documentation for this case.

 

Regards,

Bertrand

RE: [ANNOUNCE] GSMA MWC 2019 Meeting opportunity

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

I'm wondering if you have any news about RCS internetworking features ?

Here in France, we are currently testing RCS but I'm wondering how it could
be handle at a different ways ?

Please don't hesitate to reply 

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : lundi 21 janvier 2019 16:16
À : 'Stipe Tolj'; annou...@kannel.org; de...@kannel.org; 'users'
Objet : RE: [ANNOUNCE] GSMA MWC 2019 Meeting opportunity

Hello Stipe, all kannel expert,

could you please tell more about RCS Internetworking or any RCS related
product ? is it something ready ? if not any roadmap ?
Do you think RCS is the futur of SMS, if so, do you think kannel should
evolve to support it ?

Thanks in advance for your answer

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Stipe Tolj
Envoyé : lundi 14 janvier 2019 15:48
À : annou...@kannel.org; de...@kannel.org; users
Objet : [ANNOUNCE] GSMA MWC 2019 Meeting opportunity

Dear all,

as every year, we are attending the GSMA Mobile World Congress in 
Barcelona, Spain from 25 Feb to 28 Feb 2019.

If you are a mobile network operator, a messaging aggregator, a system 
integrator for mobile networks and/or services, or an enterprise 
representative in the mobile business, and would like to meet us on the 
venue for discussion about

- commercial support/consulting for Kannel deployments, development 
and/or integration

- our commercial add-on products
   - Kannel SMPP v5.0 server (smppbox)
   - Kannel SMPP v5.0 proxy filter (smppproxy)
   - Kannel AMQP v0.9.1 messaging broker (amqpbox-rabbitmq)
   - Kannel AMQP v1.0 messaging broker (amqpbox)
   - Kannel S@T gateway (gateway-stk)
   - Kannel OTA gateway (gateway-ota)
   - Kannel vSMSC (virtual SMSC) solutions
   - Kannel SMS inter-working/hubbing (iwsmsc)
   - Kannel-CG (carrier-grade) Mobile Internet Gateway (kannel-cg)
   - Kannel-CG (carrier-grade) MMSC (kannel-mmsc)

- our commercial Support Level Agreements (SLA) for business critical 
Kannel installations

- future technology integrations
   - RCS Interworking, ...

- to discuss any other topic...

please feel free to set-up an appointment with us at the MWC via our 
main web site URL http://www.kannel.org/, or via the direct interface to 
the scheduling planer via URL

   https://kannel.appointlet.com/

We're looking forward to see you at MWC in Barcelona.

-- 
Best Regards,
Stipe Tolj

---
Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

Kannel Foundation tolj.org system architecture
http://www.kannel.org/http://www.tolj.org/

st...@kannel.org  s...@tolj.org
---

RE: Which Modem is reliable for sending / receiving SMS with kannel?

[info.ubichip]

Hello Georg,

I agreed with Alvaro, it looks your modem is not able to delete the incoming
message after reading it. 
the init-string command from modem should be fine tune.

On the question to restart kannel every time the modem is not responding, I
remember you can tell kannel to reset it in case of misunderstanding or no
answer from it. Take a look on the max-error-count parameter. If the number
of errors is reached, kannel send init string by itself.


-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Georg Horn
Envoyé : lundi 30 septembre 2019 18:13
À : users
Objet : Re: Which Modem is reliable for sending / receiving SMS with kannel?

Hi Alvaro,

Am Mo den 30. September 2019 um 09:51 Uhr schrieb Alvaro Cornejo:

> The problem you describe looks like for any reason your modem is not able
> to pass the incoming messages to kannel.
> 
> What I did in the past is configure kannel to automatically look for
> messages in modem storage. I guess you are only using CNMI command. This
> command tells the modem to pass messages to kannel. however. if the
message
> got stuck in the memory, CNMI command will not check for it. You need to
> tell kannel to look periodically into the memory for the messages and free
> the messages memory. If this memory gets full, the modem will reject any
> other incoming message.

Meanwhile i believe this problem occurs if a message is received while
another message is sent. After that no more messages are received until
i reset the modem.

For example i found the following entries in kannel.log:

2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: TP-Validity-Period:
24.0 hours
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: --> AT+CMGS=76^M
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: <-- >
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: send command status:
1
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: --> [pdu data
snipped]
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: --> ^Z

Here the modem should answer with ">" and "+CMGS: 20" and "OK", but
instead a messages comes in:

2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: <-- +CMT: ,68
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: <-- [pdu data
snipped]
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: received message
from SMSC: +49176443
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: Alphanumeric sender
<...>
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: User data length
read as (54)
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: Udh decoding done
len=54 udhi=0 udhlen=0 udh=''
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: --> AT+CNMA^M
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [9] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to box:
<127.0.0.1>
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [9] DEBUG: boxc_sender: sent message to
<127.0.0.1>
2019-09-17 09:07:23 [17126] [8] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got ack

Here the modem should answer with OK but this OK never appears, instead
the ">" and "+CMGS: 20" and "OK" from the sending above appear:

2019-09-17 09:07:25 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: <-- >
2019-09-17 09:07:25 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: <-- +CMGS: 20
2019-09-17 09:07:25 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: <-- OK
2019-09-17 09:07:38 [17126] [8] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: heartbeat with load
value 0 received
2019-09-17 09:07:44 [17126] [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: send command status:
-1
2019-09-17 09:07:44 [17126] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x7f5684001880 vs 0x7f5684001880)
2019-09-17 09:07:44 [17126] [7] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent

So the modem has delivered the message to kannel, but perhaps didn't delete
it
from its memory, or didn't aknowledge to the provider that it has received
the
message?

And isn't this also a bug in kannel, that it does not recognize that the
message has been sent?

> Note that his work around is not 100% effective, but should largely reduce
> the times your modem gets locked for IM.
> 
> The commands you need to add to your config are:
> 
> On your SMSC-AT group:
> sim-buffering = true
> 
> AND on your MODEM group:
> message-storage = SM or ME. You should test which work best with your
modem.
> 
> Hope this helps,

I'll try this tomorrow, thanks for your help!

Georg

Evolution of Kannel : RCS ?

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

I'm wondering if Kannel will support RCS developped by Google and if it will be 
some plugins link to this new technology ?
Does anyone got some open source on this ?

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: Which Modem is reliable for sending / receiving SMS with kannel?

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

I suggest differents things :
- please take a look on the INIT string message for the modem, it
could be some parameters not setup correctly (I suspect some attach to 3G
station which could not be comptabile with the TC35)
- take a look as well on the log of the modem, sometimes it lostt
the network then you can make a start/stop (see kannel commands in manual)
of the modem to restart the init,
- if none of the solutions works, buy a power plug programmer (the
cheap one at 2 or 3 E) then make your system poweroff poweron every hour,
then the modem will attach the network when the power back


For other modem, I was using serial Modem from teltonika G10 and E6(I have a
few to sell) working fine for years, and some other IP modem (please contact
me directly).

hope it help,

BR

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Georg Horn
Envoyé : jeudi 26 septembre 2019 16:13
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Which Modem is reliable for sending / receiving SMS with kannel?

Hello,

may i introduce myself, i am Georg from Koblenz / Germany and i am using
kannel for years for sending SMS-alerts.

I am using kannel version 1.4.3 and a Siemens TC35 Modem with a SIM card
from the german Telekom. We receive about 3 SMS every 5 minutes, which
works fine normally, but about every two days or so, the modem stops
receiving SMS messages. It is still logged into the mobile network
which is indicated by the flashing of the green led and it still does
send messages, but no messages are received. If i then power it off and on
again and restart kannel, it receives all the messages that have been
missing before.

I phoned the hotline from Telekom and they could see that the messages
are not delivered sometimes and they suspect a bug or defect in the
modem and i should probably try a firmware update or another modem.

Thus finally my questions: What do you think of this? Which type
of modem is reliable for sending and receiving SMS? Has anyone ever done
a firmware update on a TC35?

Kind Regards,
Georg

RE: Kannel DLR with MySQL

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

you should put dlr-mask=31 then you will be able to get all the DLR.

Dlr-url should be accessible, usually on the same machine, and then a script 
(php or other) is the solution to make the dlr process.

 

an example extract from my php script (not perfect but could be a good start)  :

 

 

$username = $_GET['username'];

$password = $_GET['password'];

$dlrmask  = $_GET['dlr-mask'];

$from = $_GET['from'];

$to = $_GET['to'];

$text = $_GET['text'];

$udh = $_GET['udh'];

$dlrurl = $_GET['dlr-url'];

$dlrtype = $_GET['dlr-type'];

$myid = $_GET['myid'];

$finalcallback = $_GET['finalcallback'];

$retry = $_GET['retry'];

$smscorig = $_GET['smscorig'];

$priority = $_GET['priority'];

 

 

if ($dlrtype && $myid )

{

$stat = 0;

switch ($dlrtype)

{

   case 1: $stat = 6; break;   // delivered to phone

   case 2: $stat = 6; break;   // non delivered to phone

   case 4: $stat = 3; break;   // queued on SMSC

   case 8: $stat = 4; break;   // delivered to SMSC

   case 16: $stat = 5; break;  // non delivered to SMSC

   case 9: $stat = 4; break;

   case 12: $stat = 4; break;

   //case 18: $stat = 5; break;   // not sure to have the case

}

 

if (($stat==5)||($retry>=$MAXRETRY)) // If SMS Failed and we retry MAXRETRY 
times

{ 

   if (!$retry)

   {

   $retry=0;

   }

   

   if ($retry<$MAXRETRY)

   { $retry=$retry+1 ;

   }

   

   else

 

   {

  // in other case, we sent the DLR status to the final server  

   //echo "SMS OK";

   

   header("Location: " . $finalcallback . "?dlr-type=" . $dlrtype ."=" 
. $myid . "=" . $retry . "=" . $smscorig);

   

 

   die();

   }

 

// Case of SMS FAILED, we retry

   //echo "SMS Failed";

header("Location: ". $mysendsms . "?username=" . $username .

"=" . $password .

"=" . $retry .

"=31" .

"=" . $from .

"=" . $to .

"=" . urlencode($text) .

"=" . $udh .

"=" . $priority .

"=" . urlencode($myproxy . $allvar . 
"=%d=%i=" . $myid . "=" . $retry)   );

 

}

else

{

   // in other case, the SMS state is sent to the main server

   //echo "SMS OK";

   if ($stat==4) 

{

// include "credit_eat.php"; // script to add billing feature

   }

   

 

   header("Location: " . $finalcallback . "?dlr-type=" . $dlrtype ."=" 
. $myid . "=" . $retry);

 

 

}

 

}

 

 

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de pape fall
Envoyé : mercredi 24 juillet 2019 12:42
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Kannel DLR with MySQL

 

Hello,

I use kannel for sending sms. Now I want to get the dlr. After configuration, 
sent sms are inserted into mysql dlr table. The status of the sms are still 0. 

I add dlr-mask=7 to the request parameters for sending sms. After 
investigation, I understood that I have to put the dlr-url for updating the 
status of the sms.

 

Could someone help me to define the dlr-url and make the php file?

 

Could I retrieve the sent sms status thanks to an ID for updating another 
database?(the ID must be known when the sms are sent)

 

In attached my  kannel.conf

 

Regards,

Fall,

RE: [ANNOUNCE] GSMA MWC 2019 Meeting opportunity

[info.ubichip]

Hello Stipe, all kannel expert,

could you please tell more about RCS Internetworking or any RCS related
product ? is it something ready ? if not any roadmap ?
Do you think RCS is the futur of SMS, if so, do you think kannel should
evolve to support it ?

Thanks in advance for your answer

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Stipe Tolj
Envoyé : lundi 14 janvier 2019 15:48
À : annou...@kannel.org; de...@kannel.org; users
Objet : [ANNOUNCE] GSMA MWC 2019 Meeting opportunity

Dear all,

as every year, we are attending the GSMA Mobile World Congress in 
Barcelona, Spain from 25 Feb to 28 Feb 2019.

If you are a mobile network operator, a messaging aggregator, a system 
integrator for mobile networks and/or services, or an enterprise 
representative in the mobile business, and would like to meet us on the 
venue for discussion about

- commercial support/consulting for Kannel deployments, development 
and/or integration

- our commercial add-on products
   - Kannel SMPP v5.0 server (smppbox)
   - Kannel SMPP v5.0 proxy filter (smppproxy)
   - Kannel AMQP v0.9.1 messaging broker (amqpbox-rabbitmq)
   - Kannel AMQP v1.0 messaging broker (amqpbox)
   - Kannel S@T gateway (gateway-stk)
   - Kannel OTA gateway (gateway-ota)
   - Kannel vSMSC (virtual SMSC) solutions
   - Kannel SMS inter-working/hubbing (iwsmsc)
   - Kannel-CG (carrier-grade) Mobile Internet Gateway (kannel-cg)
   - Kannel-CG (carrier-grade) MMSC (kannel-mmsc)

- our commercial Support Level Agreements (SLA) for business critical 
Kannel installations

- future technology integrations
   - RCS Interworking, ...

- to discuss any other topic...

please feel free to set-up an appointment with us at the MWC via our 
main web site URL http://www.kannel.org/, or via the direct interface to 
the scheduling planer via URL

   https://kannel.appointlet.com/

We're looking forward to see you at MWC in Barcelona.

-- 
Best Regards,
Stipe Tolj

---
Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

Kannel Foundation tolj.org system architecture
http://www.kannel.org/http://www.tolj.org/

st...@kannel.org  s...@tolj.org
---

RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

[info.ubichip]

Many thanks Alexander.

 

In any chance do you have any kannel.conf example using this ? specially  
ssl-client-cipher-list and ssl-trusted-ca-file?

 

thanks

 

De : Alexander Malysh [mailto:malys...@gmail.com] De la part de 
amal...@kannel.org
Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2018 11:13
À : info.ubichip
Cc : Web Min; users
Objet : Re: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

Hi,

 

please check userguide:

https://kannel.org/download/kannel-userguide-snapshot/userguide.html#AEN482

 

Special:


ssl-client-certkey-file (c)

filename

A PEM encoded SSL certificate and private key file to be used with SSL client 
connections. This certificate is used for the HTTPS client side only, i.e. for 
SMS service requests to SSL-enabled HTTP servers.


ssl-server-cert-file (c)

filename

A PEM encoded SSL certificate file to be used with SSL server connections. This 
certificate is used for the HTTPS server side only, i.e. for the administration 
HTTP server and the HTTP interface to send SMS messages.


ssl-server-key-file (c)

filename

A PEM encoded SSL private key file to be used with SSL server connections. This 
key is associated to the specified certificate and is used for the HTTPS server 
side only.


ssl-trusted-ca-file

filename

This file contains the certificates Kannel is willing to trust when working as 
a HTTPS client. If this option is not set, certificates are not validated and 
those the identity of the server is not proven.


ssl-client-cipher-list

filename

Defines the list of encryption suites and ciphers to be used for client side 
connections. For further details please see 
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man1/ciphers.html


ssl-server-cipher-list

filename

Defines the list of encryption suites and ciphers to be used for server side 
connections. For further details please see 
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man1/ciphers.html

 

Thanks,

Alex

 





Am 03.11.2018 um 17:25 schrieb info.ubichip :

 

Dear Alexander,

 

may you please help me to find any information about your added feature on 
SSL/TLS, specially how to efine which SSL/TLS chiper suites to use ?

 

Thanks a lot for you answer

 

De : users [ <mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org> mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] 
De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : samedi 3 novembre 2018 17:14
À : 'Web Min'
Cc :  <mailto:users@kannel.org> users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

the email was gone too fast :

 

do you have any experience with the following added feature of the 1.4.5 
specially the one in red (le last one) ?

 

* Added OpenSSL 1.1.x support.

  

  * Added support for chained certificate files.

  

  * Added support to define which SSL/TLS chipher suites to use.

 

De : info.ubichip [ <mailto:info.ubic...@free.fr> mailto:info.ubic...@free.fr] 
Envoyé : samedi 3 novembre 2018 17:12
À : 'Web Min'
Cc : ' <mailto:users@kannel.org> users@kannel.org'
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

thanks,

 

it working with 

./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl 

 

but not with :

 

./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl --with-ssl

Configuring OpenSSL support ...
configure: error: Unable to find OpenSSL libs and/or directories at yes

 

Do you ha

 

 

De : Web Min [mailto:meweb...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : samedi 3 novembre 2018 09:05
À : info.ubic...@free.fr
Cc : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

Hello,

 

In order to start with Ubuntu make sure the following packages are installed:

 

apt-get install libmysqlclient-dev libmysqld-dev libxml2 libxml2-dev bison 
byacc libssh-dev libssl-dev

 

Best Regards,

 

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:51 AM info.ubichip < <mailto:info.ubic...@free.fr> 
info.ubic...@free.fr> wrote:

hello,

I tried to reinstall a full clean machine with ubuntu 18.04 and last openssl
1.1.0g (nov 2017)
and when I tried 
./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl --with-ssl
I got error :
Configuring OpenSSL support ...
configure: error: Unable to find OpenSSL libs and/or directories at yes

Does anyone got this error ?

thanks in advance


-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto: <mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org> users-boun...@kannel.org] 
De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 16:41
À :  <mailto:users@kannel.org> users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

Hello,

some update, I forgot to mention, I'm using kannel 1.4.5, and it has been
seen the following errors as well in smsbox log :

:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure

Does anyone have seen this issue so far ?

thanks in advance for your help

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto: <mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org> users-boun...@kannel.org] 
De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 09:42
À :  <mailto:users@kannel.org> users@kannel.org
Objet : TLS 1.2 support in kannel
Importan

RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

[info.ubichip]

Dear Alexander,

 

may you please help me to find any information about your added feature on 
SSL/TLS, specially how to efine which SSL/TLS chiper suites to use ?

 

Thanks a lot for you answer

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : samedi 3 novembre 2018 17:14
À : 'Web Min'
Cc : users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

the email was gone too fast :

 

do you have any experience with the following added feature of the 1.4.5 
specially the one in red (le last one) ?

 

* Added OpenSSL 1.1.x support.

  

  * Added support for chained certificate files.

  

  * Added support to define which SSL/TLS chipher suites to use.

 

De : info.ubichip [mailto:info.ubic...@free.fr] 
Envoyé : samedi 3 novembre 2018 17:12
À : 'Web Min'
Cc : 'users@kannel.org'
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

thanks,

 

it working with 

./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl 

 

but not with :

 

./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl --with-ssl

Configuring OpenSSL support ...
configure: error: Unable to find OpenSSL libs and/or directories at yes

 

Do you ha

 

 

De : Web Min [mailto:meweb...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : samedi 3 novembre 2018 09:05
À : info.ubic...@free.fr
Cc : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

Hello,

 

In order to start with Ubuntu make sure the following packages are installed:

 

apt-get install libmysqlclient-dev libmysqld-dev libxml2 libxml2-dev bison 
byacc libssh-dev libssl-dev

 

Best Regards,

 

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:51 AM info.ubichip  wrote:

hello,

I tried to reinstall a full clean machine with ubuntu 18.04 and last openssl
1.1.0g (nov 2017)
and when I tried 
./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl --with-ssl
I got error :
Configuring OpenSSL support ...
configure: error: Unable to find OpenSSL libs and/or directories at yes

Does anyone got this error ?

thanks in advance


-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 16:41
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

Hello,

some update, I forgot to mention, I'm using kannel 1.4.5, and it has been
seen the following errors as well in smsbox log :

:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure

Does anyone have seen this issue so far ?

thanks in advance for your help

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 09:42
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : TLS 1.2 support in kannel
Importance : Haute

Hello,

I have similar issue with SSL and kannel, in SMSBOX it appears the following
errors :

2018-10-01 21:11:12 [3345] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch
<https://www.joe.com/input.php?from=%2B712341234>
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL read failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)

It is related to the fact the web site drop TLS1 and TLS1.1 and is using
only TLS 1.2 and up. Does someone got similar issue and how to resolve or
patch it ?

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

[info.ubichip]

the email was gone too fast :

 

do you have any experience with the following added feature of the 1.4.5 
specially the one in red (le last one) ?

 

* Added OpenSSL 1.1.x support.

  

  * Added support for chained certificate files.

  

  * Added support to define which SSL/TLS chipher suites to use.

 

De : info.ubichip [mailto:info.ubic...@free.fr] 
Envoyé : samedi 3 novembre 2018 17:12
À : 'Web Min'
Cc : 'users@kannel.org'
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

thanks,

 

it working with 

./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl 

 

but not with :

 

./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl --with-ssl

Configuring OpenSSL support ...
configure: error: Unable to find OpenSSL libs and/or directories at yes

 

Do you ha

 

 

De : Web Min [mailto:meweb...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : samedi 3 novembre 2018 09:05
À : info.ubic...@free.fr
Cc : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

Hello,

 

In order to start with Ubuntu make sure the following packages are installed:

 

apt-get install libmysqlclient-dev libmysqld-dev libxml2 libxml2-dev bison 
byacc libssh-dev libssl-dev

 

Best Regards,

 

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:51 AM info.ubichip  wrote:

hello,

I tried to reinstall a full clean machine with ubuntu 18.04 and last openssl
1.1.0g (nov 2017)
and when I tried 
./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl --with-ssl
I got error :
Configuring OpenSSL support ...
configure: error: Unable to find OpenSSL libs and/or directories at yes

Does anyone got this error ?

thanks in advance


-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 16:41
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

Hello,

some update, I forgot to mention, I'm using kannel 1.4.5, and it has been
seen the following errors as well in smsbox log :

:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure

Does anyone have seen this issue so far ?

thanks in advance for your help

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 09:42
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : TLS 1.2 support in kannel
Importance : Haute

Hello,

I have similar issue with SSL and kannel, in SMSBOX it appears the following
errors :

2018-10-01 21:11:12 [3345] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch
<https://www.joe.com/input.php?from=%2B712341234>
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL read failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)

It is related to the fact the web site drop TLS1 and TLS1.1 and is using
only TLS 1.2 and up. Does someone got similar issue and how to resolve or
patch it ?

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

[info.ubichip]

thanks,

 

it working with 

./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl 

 

but not with :

 

./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl --with-ssl

Configuring OpenSSL support ...
configure: error: Unable to find OpenSSL libs and/or directories at yes



 

Do you ha

 

 

De : Web Min [mailto:meweb...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : samedi 3 novembre 2018 09:05
À : info.ubic...@free.fr
Cc : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

 

Hello,

 

In order to start with Ubuntu make sure the following packages are installed:

 

apt-get install libmysqlclient-dev libmysqld-dev libxml2 libxml2-dev bison 
byacc libssh-dev libssl-dev

 

Best Regards,

 

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:51 AM info.ubichip  wrote:

hello,

I tried to reinstall a full clean machine with ubuntu 18.04 and last openssl
1.1.0g (nov 2017)
and when I tried 
./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl --with-ssl
I got error :
Configuring OpenSSL support ...
configure: error: Unable to find OpenSSL libs and/or directories at yes

Does anyone got this error ?

thanks in advance


-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 16:41
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

Hello,

some update, I forgot to mention, I'm using kannel 1.4.5, and it has been
seen the following errors as well in smsbox log :

:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure

Does anyone have seen this issue so far ?

thanks in advance for your help

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 09:42
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : TLS 1.2 support in kannel
Importance : Haute

Hello,

I have similar issue with SSL and kannel, in SMSBOX it appears the following
errors :

2018-10-01 21:11:12 [3345] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch
<https://www.joe.com/input.php?from=%2B712341234>
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL read failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)

It is related to the fact the web site drop TLS1 and TLS1.1 and is using
only TLS 1.2 and up. Does someone got similar issue and how to resolve or
patch it ?

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

[info.ubichip]

hello,

I tried to reinstall a full clean machine with ubuntu 18.04 and last openssl
1.1.0g (nov 2017)
and when I tried 
./configure --enable-start-stop-daemon --with-mysql --enable-ssl --with-ssl
I got error :
Configuring OpenSSL support ...
configure: error: Unable to find OpenSSL libs and/or directories at yes

Does anyone got this error ?

thanks in advance


-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 16:41
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

Hello,

some update, I forgot to mention, I'm using kannel 1.4.5, and it has been
seen the following errors as well in smsbox log :

:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure

Does anyone have seen this issue so far ?

thanks in advance for your help

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 09:42
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : TLS 1.2 support in kannel
Importance : Haute

Hello,

I have similar issue with SSL and kannel, in SMSBOX it appears the following
errors :

2018-10-01 21:11:12 [3345] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch
<https://www.joe.com/input.php?from=%2B712341234>
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL read failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)

It is related to the fact the web site drop TLS1 and TLS1.1 and is using
only TLS 1.2 and up. Does someone got similar issue and how to resolve or
patch it ?

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: TLS 1.2 support in kannel

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

some update, I forgot to mention, I'm using kannel 1.4.5, and it has been
seen the following errors as well in smsbox log :

:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure

Does anyone have seen this issue so far ?

thanks in advance for your help

-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 2 novembre 2018 09:42
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : TLS 1.2 support in kannel
Importance : Haute

Hello,

I have similar issue with SSL and kannel, in SMSBOX it appears the following
errors :

2018-10-01 21:11:12 [3345] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch
<https://www.joe.com/input.php?from=%2B712341234>
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL read failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)

It is related to the fact the web site drop TLS1 and TLS1.1 and is using
only TLS 1.2 and up. Does someone got similar issue and how to resolve or
patch it ?

Thanks in advance for your help

TLS 1.2 support in kannel

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

I have similar issue with SSL and kannel, in SMSBOX it appears the following
errors :

2018-10-01 21:11:12 [3345] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch

2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL write failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)
2018-10-01 21:11:32 [3345] [8] ERROR: SSL read failed: OpenSSL error 1:
error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)

It is related to the fact the web site drop TLS1 and TLS1.1 and is using
only TLS 1.2 and up. Does someone got similar issue and how to resolve or
patch it ?

Thanks in advance for your help

issue with www.kannel.org

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

Do you have access to the web site www.kannel.org ?
it looks to be down ?

Regards

RE: opensmppbox and mysql

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

I'm not sure to well understand your need, but please take a look on sqlbox 
which be the solution.

 

BR

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de uves
Envoyé : mercredi 31 janvier 2018 11:04
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : opensmppbox and mysql

 

Hello

 

We use opensmppbox to send sms, directing traffic via route-to-smsc to the call

for the smsc = http channel and receiving for url.

 

Is it possible for the opensmppbox traffic to be saved to the mysql database 
without passing to url?

RE: Error reconciliate DLR

[info.ubichip]

I forgot to mention. Usually it happened when the machine (acting as smpp 
client) connected to our opensmppbox is not yet connected.

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : mardi 23 janvier 2018 23:46
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Error reconciliate DLR

 

Hello everybody,

 

First of all happy new year !

 

I'm facing issue with DLR. My configuration is as follow :

- Kannel with  opensmppbox as smpp server. User send sms through smpp account 
to opensmppbox, then opensmppbox relay it to bearerbox which send it through a 
general smppc account (client). Then when DLR come back from this SMPP account, 
the bearerbox send it back to opensmppbox via smsbox. I have also sqlbox to log 
all.

 

But for lot of DLR, I have this kind of error message in smsbox log :

2018-01-23 08:00:12 [27471] [4] INFO: Starting delivery report  from 
<12345678>

2018-01-23 08:00:12 [27471] [9] ERROR: URL <79c4dd12> doesn't start with 
`http://' nor `https://'

 

So the DLR could not be delivered to the originator sender (which is connected 
to the opensmppbox) and then could not be reconciliate, and the DLR table is 
growing.

 

Do someone has an idea ?

 

Thanks in advance for your help

Error reconciliate DLR

[info.ubichip]

Hello everybody,

 

First of all happy new year !

 

I'm facing issue with DLR. My configuration is as follow :

- Kannel with  opensmppbox as smpp server. User send sms through smpp account 
to opensmppbox, then opensmppbox relay it to bearerbox which send it through a 
general smppc account (client). Then when DLR come back from this SMPP account, 
the bearerbox send it back to opensmppbox via smsbox. I have also sqlbox to log 
all.

 

But for lot of DLR, I have this kind of error message in smsbox log :

2018-01-23 08:00:12 [27471] [4] INFO: Starting delivery report  from 
<12345678>

2018-01-23 08:00:12 [27471] [9] ERROR: URL <79c4dd12> doesn't start with 
`http://' nor `https://'

 

So the DLR could not be delivered to the originator sender (which is connected 
to the opensmppbox) and then could not be reconciliate, and the DLR table is 
growing.

 

Do someone has an idea ?

 

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: PANIC error in Kannel

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

It looks to be more DNS oriented than Kannel, please try to ping your
hostname before.

 

Happy new year

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de kabin mool
Envoyé : lundi 1 janvier 2018 07:05
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : PANIC error in Kannel

 

Hi,

 

I have recently used kannel 1.4.4 and getting this type of error regularly
in my log. Any idea, in which case this error is generated and how can it be
corrected.

 

2018-01-01 07:20:47 [6866] [9] ERROR: Error while gw_gethostbyname occurs.
2018-01-01 07:20:47 [6866] [9] ERROR: System error 1: Operation not
permitted
2018-01-01 07:20:47 [6866] [9] ERROR: Couldn't find the IP number of
`Happynewyearpapa.'
2018-01-01 07:20:47 [6866] [9] PANIC: gwlib/socket.c:571: udp_sendto:
Assertion `octstr_len(addr) == sizeof(sa)' failed.

Thanks, 

Kabin

 

RE: Send Table To Sent Table

[info.ubichip]

One is used to log the sending process (DLR, ...etc), the other is used to make 
rapid insertion for big volume. 

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Robin C
Envoyé : vendredi 15 décembre 2017 07:29
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Send Table To Sent Table

 

Dear Friends,,

 

I want to know how the messages are going from Send table to Sent table in 
sqlbox? 


I mean from sql-log-table = sent_ab To

sql-insert-table = send_ab

-- 

 

Disclaimer:  This message contains confidential information and is intended 
only for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you should 
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system.  E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version.

7 Switch off as you go |q Recycle always | P Print only if absolutely necessary

RE: Queue in Store

[info.ubichip]

yes, are you using a direct smpp connection ? if so, do you know what is the 
tps allowed by your provider ?

 

 

De : Vitória Silva [mailto:rodrigofsan...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi 13 décembre 2017 12:18
À : Vangelis Typaldos
Cc : Robin C; info.ubichip; users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: Queue in Store

 

​ok, but to help you better what kind of equipment do you use? Do you use 3g 
modems or some gsm gateway? How is your continuous sending configured?

 


 
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
 

Livre de vírus.  
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
 www.avast.com. 

 

2017-12-13 8:09 GMT-03:00 Vangelis Typaldos <vty...@outlook.com>:

As far as you have a working kannel environment you should check for latency, 
retransmission, retries... A tcpdump would help you identify the source of 
issue.

 

BR

Vangelis

 

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.


From: Robin C

Sent: Τετάρτη, 13 Δεκεμβρίου 2017 - 13:01

To: info.ubichip

Cc: users@kannel.org

Subject: Re: Queue in Store

 

Ok... Please find the details below.: 

Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Feb 10 2017 19:38:03', compiler `4.4.7 
20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-17)'. System Linux, release 2.6.32-696.1.1.el6.x86_64, 
version #1 SMP Tue Apr 11 17:13:24 UTC 2017, machine x86_64. Hostname 
CentOS-67-64-minimal, .Libxml version 2.7.6. Using OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 
2013. Compiled with MySQL 5.7.17, using MySQL 5.7.18. Using native malloc.

 

 

 

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:28 PM, info.ubichip <info.ubic...@free.fr> wrote:

Hello,

 

In order to give a chance to the community to answer you, please provide at 
least a description of what you are using (kannel versio, opensmppbox, 
databse...etc).

 

Regards

 

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Robin C
Envoyé : mercredi 13 décembre 2017 06:38
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Queue in Store

 




Dear Team,

 

When we send large volume of sms the queue is building up in the store. And it 
process very slowly. Only getting 16 tps. Can anyone help me to solve this 
issue.? 

-- 

 

 

Disclaimer:  This message contains confidential information and is intended 
only for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you should 
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system.  E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version.

7 Switch off as you go |q Recycle always | P Print only if absolutely necessary





 

-- 

  

 

 

Disclaimer:  This message contains confidential information and is intended 
only for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you should 
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system.  E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version.

7 Switch off as you go |q Recycle always | P Print only if absolutely necessary





 

-- 


Deus seja Louvado eternamente Amem !! 
 (o_Rodrigo Ferreira Santos
 //\RapidoSMS o seu Site de SMS
 V_/_   rodrigofsan...@gmail.com
Linux user number 372852

  <https://www.linuxcounter.net/cert/372852.png> 

RE: Queue in Store

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

In order to give a chance to the community to answer you, please provide at 
least a description of what you are using (kannel versio, opensmppbox, 
databse...etc).

 

Regards

 

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Robin C
Envoyé : mercredi 13 décembre 2017 06:38
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Queue in Store

 




Dear Team,

 

When we send large volume of sms the queue is building up in the store. And it 
process very slowly. Only getting 16 tps. Can anyone help me to solve this 
issue.? 

-- 

 

 

Disclaimer:  This message contains confidential information and is intended 
only for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you should 
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system.  E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version.

7 Switch off as you go |q Recycle always | P Print only if absolutely necessary

Strange SMS Flash

[info.ubichip]

Hello all,

I have a strange behavior coming from kannel, It'm trying to send Flash sms 
(mclass 0), and I'm receiving a 'null' sms on my phone, but the behavior looks 
to be good (the sms is not stored in my phone but appeared in the screen only). 
After the phone is aking if I want to save, but this should be depndant from 
the phone (Sony Xperia).

 

Does someone have similar issue ?

this request is working :

http://127.0.0.1:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=xxx=yyy=31=MYPHONE=0033712341234=2=0=TEST+FLASH+ZERO+0942=1=myprovider=http%3A%2F%2F127.0.0.1%2F%7E

This one is making a regular SMS :

http://127.0.0.1:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=xxx=yyy=31=MYPHONE=0033712341234=2=0=TEST+FLASH+ZERO+0942=0=myprovider=http%3A%2F%2F127.0.0.1%2F%7E

 

It looks something wrong with coding parameter and mclass parameter ?

 

Thanks in advance for your help

 

RE: Some messages are not processed from send table

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

please provide us example.

 

are you using sqlbox ?

 

BR

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Robin C
Envoyé : lundi 19 juin 2017 08:54
À : kannel users@kannel.org
Objet : Some messages are not processed from send table

 

Dear Users,

Some messages are not processed from send table.Especially unicode messages.So 
every messages getting queued on send table.After I clear that unicode 
messages;other messages get delivered.What might be the issue.???


 

-- 

 

   Thanks & Regards,

  

  

 

Disclaimer:  This message contains confidential information and is intended 
only for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you should 
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system.  E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version.

7 Switch off as you go |q Recycle always | P Print only if absolutely necessary

RE: Blocking message to Particular Numbers.

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

Please take a look on blacklist feature in the kannel manual.

 

BR

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Robin C
Envoyé : lundi 22 mai 2017 08:39
À : kannel users@kannel.org
Objet : Blocking message to Particular Numbers.

 

Dear Users,

 

Is it possible to block messages being delivered to particular numbers? If so 
how can I do that. Please help me. 


 

-- 

 

  

 

Disclaimer:  This message contains confidential information and is intended 
only for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you should 
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system.  E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version.

7 Switch off as you go |q Recycle always | P Print only if absolutely necessary

RE: FREE SMPP SERVER

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

It looks to have plenty of features, I have some questions :

 - is it based on ksmpp (many field in the conf file are similar) ?

 - on which machine your binary is compiled (I'm not sure all the 
target server are the same)? if dependant, perhaps the best is to provide the 
source?

 - where can we find some manuals or tutorial ?

 - what is the need of activation for ip server in case of private 
network ?

 

Thanks for your answer

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de vinayak mv
Envoyé : mardi 16 mai 2017 18:47
À : kannel users
Objet : FREE SMPP SERVER

 

Dear Users,

VSMPPBOX an SMPP Server is now free to use with the following features

PREPAID/POSTPAID WITH CREDIT/COST SYSTEM

DND FILTERING

SPAM FILTERING

TEMPLATE FILTERING

PREFIX BASED ROUTING

FAKE DLR GENERATION

DATABASE BASED QUEUING

WORKING FLOW

SMSC<>BEARERBOX<--->VSMPPBOX

RE: Smppbox is being stuck when hit the amount of opened files

[info.ubichip]

Hello Denis,

 

Did you check the port binded by smppbox ?

 

Regards

 

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Denis Lezgin
Envoyé : mardi 9 mai 2017 17:57
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Smppbox is being stuck when hit the amount of opened files

 

  

 Hi all,

In last few months we have been facing an issue with amount of opened files 
(file descriptors) for smppbox daemon.

When the amount of opened files come to specific value (4850 opened files) 
smppbox is being stuck and only restart of could help. The most of opened files 
are used by Kannel daemons (bearerbox and smppbox).

We use commercial version of smppbox - 1.8.207-meta-r4019 and patched bearerbox 
version with some custom patches and changing value of MAX_LOGFILES parameter.

Ulimits are configured as following (for user Kannel):

 

$ ulimit -a
core file size  (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size   (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 0
file size   (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) 120242
max locked memory   (kbytes, -l) 64
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files  (-n) 50
pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8
POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200
real-time priority  (-r) 0
stack size  (kbytes, -s) 8192
cpu time   (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes  (-u) 120242
virtual memory  (kbytes, -v) unlimited
file locks  (-x) unlimited

 

Below is some other system settings related to that:

 

$ cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
  44480   1529806
$ cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
 1529806

 

$ ps -u kannel

  PID TTY  TIME CMD

 3762 ?02:03:18 smppbox

 8522 ?00:00:00 bearerbox

 8523 ?00:27:05 bearerbox

 

 

The error I noticed before smppbox being stuck is:

 

> Max instances reached or expired, binding denied!

 

All the solutions I found on the internet didn't help at all.

 

Could you please shed a light on possible solution?

 

 

Thank you in advance.



Best Regards,

 

 

  

 

RE: Maximum Number of simultaneous SMSC's connection in Kannel

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

The best is to use fakesmsc and make some tests that will show you where are 
the limitations of your server.

 

Regards

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Alvaro Cornejo
Envoyé : mardi 21 mars 2017 16:24
À : Farough Fazal
Cc : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: Maximum Number of simultaneous SMSC's connection in Kannel

 

Hi Fazal

 

Kannel, by itself, has no limits in terms of msg/sec or number of simultaneous 
connections.

 

The limit is usually in the hardware you use, how you tune your database and 
your link bandwidth to your service provider.

 

Regards,

 

Alvaro




|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular 
y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y 
GPRS online
  Visitenos en www.perusms.com 

 

2017-03-21 5:24 GMT-05:00 Farough Fazal :

Dear Experts,

 

For my knowledge, please help me out in knowing that how many maximum number of 
simultaneous SMSC's can be defined within the kannel.

 

Secondly say if i can define 100 simultaneous SMSC's with each supporting a TPS 
of 100 Msg/sec. Would kannel be able to handle 100 msg/sec ?

 

Thanks & Regards.

 

 

 

RE: issue with dlr lost with opensmppbox

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

Do someone have any idea ?

regards


-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 10 mars 2017 15:45
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : issue with dlr lost with opensmppbox

Hello,

I assume probably this issue has been raise years ago (I read something in 
2011), but I couldn't find any answer. Here is the issue :
I'm using opensmppbox, bearerbox sqlbox and smsbox. Different accounts (toto1 
to toto9) has been setup in opensmppbox, 

Sometime the whole box process are restarted, and then the SMPP account DLR 
before customer can connect (totoX), so the DLR looks to be lost because of 
lack of path to send. 
Do you think there is a way to hold on these DLR until customers connect 
correctly ?

Any help will be appreciate


smsbox log :
2017-03-10 07:00:05 [29215] [9] ERROR: Couldn't send request to <319addf3>
2017-03-10 07:00:05 [29215] [9] ERROR: URL <4944ff5a> doesn't start with 
`http:/ /' nor `https://'

Kannel.log :

2017-03-10 07:00:04 [29179] [9] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got boxc_id  from 
<127.0.0.1>
2017-03-10 07:00:04 [29179] [4] WARNING: Could not route message to smsbox id 
, smsbox is gone!
2017-03-10 07:00:04 [29179] [4] WARNING: smsbox_list empty!
2017-03-10 07:00:04 [29179] [4] WARNING: Could not route message to smsbox id 
, smsbox is gone!

issue with dlr lost with opensmppbox

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

I assume probably this issue has been raise years ago (I read something in 
2011), but I couldn't find any answer. Here is the issue :
I'm using opensmppbox, bearerbox sqlbox and smsbox. Different accounts (toto1 
to toto9) has been setup in opensmppbox, 

Sometime the whole box process are restarted, and then the SMPP account DLR 
before customer can connect (totoX), so the DLR looks to be lost because of 
lack of path to send. 
Do you think there is a way to hold on these DLR until customers connect 
correctly ?

Any help will be appreciate


smsbox log :
2017-03-10 07:00:05 [29215] [9] ERROR: Couldn't send request to <319addf3>
2017-03-10 07:00:05 [29215] [9] ERROR: URL <4944ff5a> doesn't start with `http:/
/' nor `https://'

Kannel.log :

2017-03-10 07:00:04 [29179] [9] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got boxc_id  from
<127.0.0.1>
2017-03-10 07:00:04 [29179] [4] WARNING: Could not route message to smsbox id 
, smsbox is gone!
2017-03-10 07:00:04 [29179] [4] WARNING: smsbox_list empty!
2017-03-10 07:00:04 [29179] [4] WARNING: Could not route message to smsbox id 
, smsbox is gone!

RE: R: Using my phone and Kannel to send SMS

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

perhaps, the first step is not to start kannel, but only try to make a connect 
to your tty then, try to make 'ATZ', and then see the answer from the modem. 

If there is no answer, it looks to be an speed connection modem setup issue, 
then try another speed, and so on.

 

BR

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de umbertofilippo
Envoyé : lundi 13 février 2017 22:46
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: R: Using my phone and Kannel to send SMS

 

I finally managed to recognize which tty my phone is assigned (tty9).

But now I ma having permission issues. I read from the user guide "In Ubuntu 
linux you just need to assign kannel user to group "dial"", but I don't know 
what that means...

So I tried the discouraged way just for testing: the initialization with sudo.

I am still having issues. I am receiving:

"ERROR: AT2[/dev/tty9]: Wrong or no answer to ATZ"

"INFO: AT2[/dev/tty9]: Closing device"

"ERROR: AT2[/dev/tty9]: Couldn't connect"

Is it something related to the speed (at the moment it is set to 9600)?

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

 

On 13/02/2017 08:02, umbertofilippo wrote:

Forgot to say that I plugged my phone via USB cable and it was recognized 
properly by my system. I am on Ubuntu 16.04.

  _  

Da: umbertofilippo  
Inviato: ‎12/‎02/‎2017 20:03
A: users@kannel.org
Oggetto: Using my phone and Kannel to send SMS

Hi,

I am trying to use my Nokia Lumia 625 to send SMS using Kannel.

I followed the tutorial, and I am using the 'smskannel.conf' combined with the 
'modems.conf' to get it work, but I need some help.

I am encountering difficulties, since I don't know what is the actual value of 
the variable 'device' in my configuration. So, when I start the bearerbox, it 
panics as expected. Below is a piece of my configuration file, and the output 
of bearerbox.

The /dev/ttyACM was just a guess, but it is not working. I tried the doing 
"grep tty /var/log/messages" from terminal but it seems I have no such 
file/folder.

I also tried "dmesg | grep tty" and it only gives "[0.00] console 
[tty0] enabled".

# CORE

group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13001
admin-password = bar
box-deny-ip = "*.*.*.*"

 

# SMSC CONNECTIONS

 

group = smsc
smsc = at
modemtype = auto
device = /dev/ttyACM
speed = 9600
sms-center = [HIDDEN :)]

BEARERBOX OUTPUT AFTER "bearerbox -v 1 
/home/umberto/Documents/call_my_dog/kannel_conf/smsphone.conf"

 

2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: Debug_lvl = 1, log_file = , log_lvl 
= 0
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] WARNING: DLR: using default 'internal' for 
storage type.
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: DLR using storage type: internal
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: HTTP: Opening server at port 13000.
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: BOXC: 'smsbox-max-pending' not set, using 
default (100).
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: Set SMS resend frequency to 60 seconds.
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: SMS resend retry set to unlimited.
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: DLR rerouting for smsc id <(null)> 
disabled.
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: AT2[/dev/ttyACM]: configuration doesn't 
show modemtype. will autodetect
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: 
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [6] INFO: AT2[/dev/ttyACM]: opening device
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [0] INFO: Kannel bearerbox II version 1.4.4 starting
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [6] ERROR: AT2[/dev/ttyACM]: open failed! ERRNO=2
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [6] ERROR: System error 2: No such file or directory
2017-02-12 20:00:54 [5400] [6] ERROR: AT2[/dev/ttyACM]: Couldn't connect 
(retrying in 10 seconds).

 

RE: Detect phone calls?

[info.ubichip]

yes, if you log all the modem trafic, you will see 'AT+RING'

 

 

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Rene Kluwen
Envoyé : mardi 31 janvier 2017 12:59
À : davidjesse...@aol.com; users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: Detect phone calls?

 

If you are using a gsm modem, there might be something that you can detect in 
the log files.

 

== Rene

 

-- Origineel bericht --

Van: davidjesse...@aol.com

Aan: users@kannel.org

Verzonden: 30-1-2017 4:02:15

Onderwerp: Detect phone calls?

 

Is it possible to detect when someone is calling the number instead of sending 
an sms? and in response send them a text message?

RE: MO messages from SMPP stored in database multiple times

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

Do you have the same sms Id/timestamp in all the MO message ?

any trigger setup in your database ?

 

Regards

 

De : Seystec Soler [mailto:seys...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : mardi 17 janvier 2017 15:23
À : info.ubichip
Cc : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: MO messages from SMPP stored in database multiple times

 

Hello

 

Thanks for your response,

I have only one service in my config file, default service:

 

group = sms-service

keyword = default

text = ""

max-messages = 0

 

Any other suggestion?

 

Regards

 

 

2017-01-17 6:54 GMT-04:00 info.ubichip <info.ubic...@free.fr>:

Hello,

 

Do you have any sms services acting as a loop and reinjecting the MO ?

 

Regards

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Seystec Soler
Envoyé : vendredi 13 janvier 2017 07:22
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: MO messages from SMPP stored in database multiple times

 

Hello.
Anyone can help me with this?

Thanks

 

2017-01-10 22:06 GMT-04:00 Seystec Soler <seys...@gmail.com>:

Hello fellows.

 

I have a strange case, I'm trying to store in database (Oracle) messages 
received from an SMPP connection. Connection it's fine and I can receive it but 
MO messages are being stored in table 50 times each. In Kannel logs and web 
interface shows one message is received but sqlbox (presumibly) is multiplying 
each MO message. My setup is: 

SMPP --> bearerbox --> sqlbox. 

I'm running only bearerbox and sqlbox.

I have been testing with versions 1.4.4 and SVN on Debian Wheezy and CentOS 7. 
Can you help me to see what I am missing on my config to avoid this behavior?

 

Thanks for you time.

 

Below is my minimal config:

 

### Begin Config file 

 

group = core

admin-port = 13000

admin-password = mySecretPass

box-allow-ip = "*.*.*.*"

admin-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1"

smsbox-port = 13001

log-file = "/var/log/kannel/kannel.log"

access-log = "/var/log/kannel/access.log"

 

group = smsbox

smsbox-id = smsbox

bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1

sendsms-port = 13013

global-sender = 13013

 

group = sqlbox

id = sqlbox-db

smsbox-id = sqlbox

bearerbox-host = localhost

bearerbox-port = 13001

smsbox-port = 13005

sql-log-table = sms_sent

sql-insert-table = sms_send

log-file = "/var/log/kannel/sqlbox.log"

 

group = oracle-connection

id = sqlbox-db

username = scott

password = tiger

tnsname = //127.0.0.1:1521/kanneldb

max-connections = 1

 

group = smsc

smsc = smpp

smsc-id = SMPP-RX

host = x.x.x.x

receive-port = 8324

#port = 8324

#transceiver-mode = true

smsc-username = smppUser

smsc-password = smppPasswd

system-type = default

interface-version = 34

enquire-link-interval = 30

dest-addr-ton = 1

dest-addr-npi = 1

source-addr-ton = 1

source-addr-npi = 1

connection-timeout = 100

alt-charset = 0

 

#Routing messages

group = smsbox-route

smsbox-id = sqlbox

smsc-id = SMPP-RX

 

### End Config file 

 

 

Best regards

 

 

RE: MO messages from SMPP stored in database multiple times

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

Do you have any sms services acting as a loop and reinjecting the MO ?

 

Regards

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Seystec Soler
Envoyé : vendredi 13 janvier 2017 07:22
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: MO messages from SMPP stored in database multiple times

 

Hello.
Anyone can help me with this?

Thanks

 

2017-01-10 22:06 GMT-04:00 Seystec Soler :

Hello fellows.

 

I have a strange case, I'm trying to store in database (Oracle) messages 
received from an SMPP connection. Connection it's fine and I can receive it but 
MO messages are being stored in table 50 times each. In Kannel logs and web 
interface shows one message is received but sqlbox (presumibly) is multiplying 
each MO message. My setup is: 

SMPP --> bearerbox --> sqlbox. 

I'm running only bearerbox and sqlbox.

I have been testing with versions 1.4.4 and SVN on Debian Wheezy and CentOS 7. 
Can you help me to see what I am missing on my config to avoid this behavior?

 

Thanks for you time.

 

Below is my minimal config:

 

### Begin Config file 

 

group = core

admin-port = 13000

admin-password = mySecretPass

box-allow-ip = "*.*.*.*"

admin-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1"

smsbox-port = 13001

log-file = "/var/log/kannel/kannel.log"

access-log = "/var/log/kannel/access.log"

 

group = smsbox

smsbox-id = smsbox

bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1

sendsms-port = 13013

global-sender = 13013

 

group = sqlbox

id = sqlbox-db

smsbox-id = sqlbox

bearerbox-host = localhost

bearerbox-port = 13001

smsbox-port = 13005

sql-log-table = sms_sent

sql-insert-table = sms_send

log-file = "/var/log/kannel/sqlbox.log"

 

group = oracle-connection

id = sqlbox-db

username = scott

password = tiger

tnsname = //127.0.0.1:1521/kanneldb

max-connections = 1

 

group = smsc

smsc = smpp

smsc-id = SMPP-RX

host = x.x.x.x

receive-port = 8324

#port = 8324

#transceiver-mode = true

smsc-username = smppUser

smsc-password = smppPasswd

system-type = default

interface-version = 34

enquire-link-interval = 30

dest-addr-ton = 1

dest-addr-npi = 1

source-addr-ton = 1

source-addr-npi = 1

connection-timeout = 100

alt-charset = 0

 

#Routing messages

group = smsbox-route

smsbox-id = sqlbox

smsc-id = SMPP-RX

 

### End Config file 

 

 

Best regards

 

Opensmppbox and long SMS

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

Does anyone know if opensmppbox is able to send/receive long sms ?

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: SMS route based on content

[info.ubichip]

oh sorry, I didn't get the 'it is not possible' ;-)

 

I was thinking to do so on application level, but the trick is then to be able 
to reconciliate back the DLR and any MO that could arrive after sending the sms

 

De : Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : mardi 6 décembre 2016 18:33
À : info.ubichip
Cc : users
Objet : Re: SMS route based on content

 

Hi

 

As far as I know, it is no possible with kannel/smppbox. You should handle that 
at your application level or modify kannel/smppbox according to your needs.

 

Regards,

 

Alvaro




|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular 
y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y 
GPRS online
  Visitenos en www.perusms.com 

 

2016-12-06 12:25 GMT-05:00 info.ubichip <info.ubic...@free.fr>:

Hello,

 

Do you know if there is anyway to route SMS to smsc_id based on its content. 

For example, I would like to send 'hello, my name is kannel' to smsc A if the 
content have the word 'name' inside.

 

Can we do so with opensmpp ?

 

any help will be appreciate, 

thanks in advance 

 

RE: SMS route based on content

[info.ubichip]

Thanks, I didn't yet have access to smppbox, only opensmppbox, do you have any 
example of configuration ?

 

Regards

 

De : Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : mardi 6 décembre 2016 18:33
À : info.ubichip
Cc : users
Objet : Re: SMS route based on content

 

Hi

 

As far as I know, it is no possible with kannel/smppbox. You should handle that 
at your application level or modify kannel/smppbox according to your needs.

 

Regards,

 

Alvaro




|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular 
y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y 
GPRS online
  Visitenos en www.perusms.com 

 

2016-12-06 12:25 GMT-05:00 info.ubichip <info.ubic...@free.fr>:

Hello,

 

Do you know if there is anyway to route SMS to smsc_id based on its content. 

For example, I would like to send 'hello, my name is kannel' to smsc A if the 
content have the word 'name' inside.

 

Can we do so with opensmpp ?

 

any help will be appreciate, 

thanks in advance 

 

SMS route based on content

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

Do you know if there is anyway to route SMS to smsc_id based on its content. 

For example, I would like to send 'hello, my name is kannel' to smsc A if the 
content have the word 'name' inside.

 

Can we do so with opensmpp ?

 

any help will be appreciate, 

thanks in advance 

RE: Source code for fake SMSC.

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

There is at least two solutions for you :

 - use the fake smsc feature in kannel (please read the manual
and well documented example)

 - use the new great opensource Ksmpp which include a 'simulate'
smsc (AFAIK)

 

I hope it helps

 

 

De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de
pratikshya.mis...@wipro.com
Envoyé : jeudi 8 septembre 2016 07:28
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Source code for fake SMSC.

 

Hi,

 

We are currently working in a project which needs fake SMSC to be
configured.

Can anyone please help us by providing us with the entire source code for
fake SMSC.  

 

Thanks & Regards ,

 



1465364660683_signature_1.png


Pratikshya Mishra


Project Engineer 


  Wipro Limited


+91-9439467901



1465364909212_image002.png




DO BUSINESS BETTER


CONSULTING | SYSTEM INTEGRATION | BUSINESS PROCESS SERVICES



1465534787464_image013.jpg

  1465534795692_image003

  1465534802951_image004.png

  1465534811338_image005.png

1465534817235_image006.png

 

 

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted
via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused
by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com 

TLS : 1.2

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

Does anyone has some experience or feedback using TLS 1.2 in kannel ? I would 
like to use in the SMSBOX part but I'm not sure how to use it ? or if is has 
been implemented ?

 

thanks in advance for your help

Kannel SMPP integration

[info.ubichip]

Hello all,

 

I was wondering if anyone has tested this SMPP layer on kannel :

http://www.smppcube.com

I'm not making any ads on it, just to know if anyone have some feedback on this 
php layer ?

 

Best regards

 

RE: Kannel Service errors while starting.

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

it looks to be windwos related error ?

 

 

 

De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part
de Aditya Prasad
Envoyé : samedi 23 juin 2012 06:57
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: Kannel Service errors while starting.

 

Hi All,

If any one knows about this error, please help me out.
Thanks!

 

Regards,

Aditya Prasad

Development

 

Cell: +918095504222

www.air-watch.com http://www.air-watch.com/ 

 

From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Aditya Prasad
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 3:59 PM
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Kannel Service errors while starting.

 

Hi All,

I have installed the Kannel services on my Windows 7
machine. 

I have used below command for installation:

 

$ cygrunsrv -I kannel_bearerbox -d Kannel Bearer box -p bearerbox.exe -a
smskannel.conf

$ cygrunsrv -I kannel_smsbox -d Kannel SMS box -p smsbox.exe -a
smskannel.conf

$ cygrunsrv -I kannel_wapbox -d Kannel Wap box -p wapbox.exe -a
smskannel.conf

 

These are installed successfully but while starting these service I’m
getting below error.

 

 

$ cygrunsrv -S kannel_bearerbox

cygrunsrv: Error starting a service: QueryServiceStatus:  Win32 error 1062:

The service has not been started.

 

Any one who knows about this, please let me know how to continue.

 

 

 

Regards,

Aditya Prasad

Development

 

Cell: +918095504222

www.air-watch.com http://www.air-watch.com/ 

 

RE: Transmit MO SMS via SMPP

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

do you have any configuration example ?

 

regards

 

 

De : Willy Mularto [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : vendredi 22 juin 2012 11:52
À : info.ubichip
Cc : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: Transmit MO SMS via SMPP

 

Assign smsc-id and route the MT to it.

 

 

On Jun 22, 2012, at 4:44 PM, info.ubichip wrote:





Hello All,

 

I need to transmit MO coming from bunch of modem to a SMPP link.

Here is the scenario, I'm connecting to kannel gw via Opensmppbox, one SMS
is sent, then if there is any answer coming from hte handset, the MO should
go from the bearebox to the SMPP link.

 

It is a very basic question, but I'm wondering in anyone got issue with this
type of configuration ?

 

Regards

 

 

Willy Mularto

F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725)

 

 

 

 

 

 





 

RE: PANIC: trunk/gw/bearerbox

[info.ubichip]

Are you sure to have the good right for the location of the log file ?

 

De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part
de alok srivastava
Envoyé : vendredi 22 juin 2012 03:53
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : PANIC: trunk/gw/bearerbox

 

Unable to understand this error.
Regards
abhi


[root@localhost ~]# ./bearerbox -v 1 trunk/gw/kannel_mod.conf 
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: Debug_lvl = 1, log_file = none,
log_lvl = 0
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: DLR using storage type: internal
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: Added logfile
`/project/kannel/logs/kannel4.log' with level `0'.
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: HTTP: Opening server at port 17000.
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: BOXC: 'smsbox-max-pending' not set,
using default (100).
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: Set SMS resend frequency to 60 seconds.
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: SMS resend retry set to unlimited.
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: DLR rerouting for smsc id (null)
disabled.
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: AT2[/dev/ttyS0]: configuration shows
modemtype wavecom
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: AT2[/dev/ttyS0]: modemtype not found,
revert to autodetect
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO:

2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [0] INFO: Kannel bearerbox II version svn-r4979
starting
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [6] INFO: AT2[/dev/ttyS0]: opening device
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [6] PANIC: trunk/gw/bearerbox [0x80e7fed]
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [6] PANIC: [0xea8440]
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [6] PANIC: trunk/gw/bearerbox [0x8086155]
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [6] PANIC: trunk/gw/bearerbox [0x808741d]
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [6] PANIC: trunk/gw/bearerbox [0x80d2681]
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [6] PANIC: /lib/libpthread.so.0 [0x2f5832]
2012-06-22 12:30:19 [8393] [6] PANIC: /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e) [0x23546e]
Segmentation fault

my kannel_mod.conf

group = core
admin-port = 17000
smsbox-port = 17001
admin-password = iadmin
log-file = /trunk/kannel/logs/kannel4.log
log-level = 0
#box-deny-ip = *.*.*.*
#box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1
dlr-storage = internal


group = smsc
smsc = at
modemtype = wavecom
device = /dev/ttyS0
speed = 9600

group = modems
id = Wavecom
name = Wavecom
need-sleep = true
enable-mms = true
speed = 115200
message-storage = SM
init-string = ATZ
init-string = ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0 C1 D2 +FCLASS=0

group = smsbox
bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
sendsms-port = 17013
global-sender = 17013
#sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-
log-file = /trunk/kannel/logs/smsboxmod.log
log-level = 0
access-log = /trunk/kannel/logs/accessmod.log

Transmit MO SMS via SMPP

[info.ubichip]

Hello All,

 

I need to transmit MO coming from bunch of modem to a SMPP link. 

Here is the scenario, I'm connecting to kannel gw via Opensmppbox, one SMS
is sent, then if there is any answer coming from hte handset, the MO should
go from the bearebox to the SMPP link.

 

It is a very basic question, but I'm wondering in anyone got issue with this
type of configuration ?

 

Regards

 

RE: outgoing SMS limit per MSISDN

[info.ubichip]

thoughput parameter is not working under ONE SMS/sec.


-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part
de Amin Mukhaimer
Envoyé : mercredi 20 juin 2012 11:29
À : 'Moazzam Ali'
Cc : users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: outgoing SMS limit per MSISDN

You may want to try using a the variable throughput in SMSC
configurations, I hope that works...

Also, kindly reply to all so others can read the message, to get help or
maybe comment on the issue :)

Good luck.

-Original Message-
From: Moazzam Ali [mailto:moz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:21 PM
To: Amin Mukhaimer
Subject: Re: outgoing SMS limit per MSISDN

We already doing this, we store messages in the MySQL database and send one
SMS to unique MSISDN per second. However, sometime when we need to restart
MySQL or Kannel or sms handler, Kannel starts storing and queuing the
messages and Kannel do not release the queued one by one It tries to process
all queued messages at once hence SMSC return throttling error in submit
response because SMSC only allows one SMS per MSISDN per second.

OK if kannel does not support such limit, is there any way if i can limit
the queue releasing one message per second?



On 06/20/2012 11:59 AM, Amin Mukhaimer wrote:
 Hi, I would suggest saving that information on your database and 
 having
your
 server check before sending new SMSs whether the number received a SMS 
 already, or maybe having the service that sends the messages run once 
 a day...

 I don't know if kannel itself has such feature, good luck.

 -Original Message-
 From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On 
 Behalf Of Moazzam Ali
 Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:29 AM
 To: users@kannel.org
 Subject: outgoing SMS limit per MSISDN

 Hi,

 is there any way to limit the outgoing SMS per destination MSISDN? For 
 example  xxx is a mobile nr and i want to let kannel send only one 
 SMS to this MSISDN per second?

 //moazzam

RE: outgoing SMS limit per MSISDN

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

the best is to trace the count using a script on the access.log then count
and trigger the stop-sms command



-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part
de Moazzam Ali
Envoyé : mercredi 20 juin 2012 02:29
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : outgoing SMS limit per MSISDN

Hi,

is there any way to limit the outgoing SMS per destination MSISDN? For
example  xxx is a mobile nr and i want to let kannel send only one SMS
to this MSISDN per second?

//moazzam

RE: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst src) are expected INVETED in the deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

is it possible to have your mysql trigger on the DLR table ?

thanks in advance

-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de 
Niel
Envoyé : mardi 20 mars 2012 07:54
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst  src) are expected INVETED in the 
deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)


Hi,

I know this is old, but, this issue still exists in the latest SVN.

My brearbox is set to use mysql storage for DLRs. As workaround I added a mysql 
trigger on the DLR table before insert that swaps the src and dest values.

Regards,



Dídac Royo wrote:
 
 Hi Users,
 
 I need your help.
 
  We have a problem in our Kannel + openSMPPbox. The values of parameters:
 dst  src are expected INVETED in the deliver_sm, I'm I correct?
 
 
 In the logs *source_addr*  *destination_addr* have the same in both *
 submit_sm* and *deliver_sm* operations (when we expect them inverted 
 in the
 deliver_sm)
 
 
This is our log for the submit_sm:
 
 
 *2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[ISMSAD]: Got PDU:
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x73b700 dump:
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 1404 = 0x057c
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr: Info
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 34695839615
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   esm_class: 3 = 0x0003
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   data_coding: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sm_length: 10 = 0x000a
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   short_message: test 16:48
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.*
 
 
and this is our log for the deiver_sm:
 
 
  *2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG: SMPP[ISMSAD]: Sending PDU:
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x73fd30 dump:
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   type_name: deliver_sm
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   command_id: 5 = 0x0005
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 2 = 0x0002
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   source_addr: Info
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 34695839615
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   esm_class: 4 = 0x0004
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   data_coding: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   sm_length: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   short_message:
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:Octet string at 0x73a350:
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:  len:  112
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:  size: 1024
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:  immutable: 0
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:  data: 69 64 3a 33 30 37 32 30 66
 30 36 20 73 75 62 3a   id:30720f06 sub:
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:  data: 30 30 31 20 64 6c 76 72 64
 3a 30 30 31 20 73 75   001 dlvrd:001 su
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:  data: 62 6d 69 74 20 64 61 74 65
 3a 31 31 30 33 30 31   bmit date:110301
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] 

RE: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst src) are expected INVETED in the deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)

[info.ubichip]

Thanks a lot, I will try it very soon.

one more question : does it change the way the dlr are coming back to the 
originator of the request through SMPP ?

-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de 
Niel
Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2012 13:25
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst  src) are expected INVETED in the 
deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)


Yes, that is where the trigger should be. My kannel config has been set to use 
the table kannel.dlr, and columns dest and src.

The MySQL command would look something like this:

delimiter $
CREATE TRIGGER `kannel`.`dlr_src_dest_swap_trigger`
  BEFORE INSERT ON `kannel`.`dlr`
  FOR EACH ROW
  BEGIN
DECLARE temp VARCHAR(100);
SET temp = NEW.src;
SET NEW.src = NEW.dest;
SET NEW.dest = temp;
  END
$

Other useful commands:

SHOW TRIGGERS;
DROP TRIGGER `dlr_src_dest_swap_trigger`; SHOW CREATE TRIGGER 
`dlr_src_dest_swap_trigger`;

Regards,



info.ubichip wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 is it possible to have your mysql trigger on the DLR table ?
 
 thanks in advance
 
 -Message d'origine-
 De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la 
 part de Niel Envoyé : mardi 20 mars 2012 07:54 À : users@kannel.org 
 Objet : Re: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst  src) are expected INVETED in 
 the deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I know this is old, but, this issue still exists in the latest SVN.
 
 My brearbox is set to use mysql storage for DLRs. As workaround I 
 added a mysql trigger on the DLR table before insert that swaps the 
 src and dest values.
 
 Regards,
 
 
 
 Dídac Royo wrote:
 
 Hi Users,
 
 I need your help.
 
  We have a problem in our Kannel + openSMPPbox. The values of parameters:
 dst  src are expected INVETED in the deliver_sm, I'm I correct?
 
 
 In the logs *source_addr*  *destination_addr* have the same in both 
 *
 submit_sm* and *deliver_sm* operations (when we expect them inverted 
 in the
 deliver_sm)
 
 
This is our log for the submit_sm:
 
 
 *2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[ISMSAD]: Got PDU:
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x73b700 dump:
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 1404 = 0x057c
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr: Info
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 34695839615
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   esm_class: 3 = 0x0003
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 1 =
 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   data_coding: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sm_length: 10 = 0x000a
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   short_message: test 16:48
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.*
 
 
and this is our log for the deiver_sm:
 
 
  *2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG: SMPP[ISMSAD]: Sending PDU:
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x73fd30 dump:
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   type_name: deliver_sm
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   command_id: 5 = 0x0005
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 2 = 0x0002
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   source_addr: Info
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 34695839615
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   esm_class: 4 = 0x0004
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5

RE: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst src) are expected INVETED in the deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)

[info.ubichip]

Related to my last question, when a DLR is coming,  the mysql request is like :

SELECT `mask`, `service`, `url`, `source`, `
destination`, `boxc` FROM `dlr` WHERE `smsc`=? AND `ts`=? AND `destination` 
LIKE CONCAT(
'%', ?) LIMIT 1

so if the destination and source are swapped, it will never match ?



-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de 
info.ubichip
Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2012 13:28
À : 'Niel'; users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst  src) are expected INVETED in the 
deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)

Thanks a lot, I will try it very soon.

one more question : does it change the way the dlr are coming back to the 
originator of the request through SMPP ?

-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de 
Niel Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2012 13:25 À : users@kannel.org Objet : RE: 
OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst  src) are expected INVETED in the deliver_sm (but 
remains as in submit_sm)


Yes, that is where the trigger should be. My kannel config has been set to use 
the table kannel.dlr, and columns dest and src.

The MySQL command would look something like this:

delimiter $
CREATE TRIGGER `kannel`.`dlr_src_dest_swap_trigger`
  BEFORE INSERT ON `kannel`.`dlr`
  FOR EACH ROW
  BEGIN
DECLARE temp VARCHAR(100);
SET temp = NEW.src;
SET NEW.src = NEW.dest;
SET NEW.dest = temp;
  END
$

Other useful commands:

SHOW TRIGGERS;
DROP TRIGGER `dlr_src_dest_swap_trigger`; SHOW CREATE TRIGGER 
`dlr_src_dest_swap_trigger`;

Regards,



info.ubichip wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 is it possible to have your mysql trigger on the DLR table ?
 
 thanks in advance
 
 -Message d'origine-
 De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la 
 part de Niel Envoyé : mardi 20 mars 2012 07:54 À : users@kannel.org 
 Objet : Re: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst  src) are expected INVETED in 
 the deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I know this is old, but, this issue still exists in the latest SVN.
 
 My brearbox is set to use mysql storage for DLRs. As workaround I 
 added a mysql trigger on the DLR table before insert that swaps the 
 src and dest values.
 
 Regards,
 
 
 
 Dídac Royo wrote:
 
 Hi Users,
 
 I need your help.
 
  We have a problem in our Kannel + openSMPPbox. The values of parameters:
 dst  src are expected INVETED in the deliver_sm, I'm I correct?
 
 
 In the logs *source_addr*  *destination_addr* have the same in both
 *
 submit_sm* and *deliver_sm* operations (when we expect them inverted 
 in the
 deliver_sm)
 
 
This is our log for the submit_sm:
 
 
 *2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[ISMSAD]: Got PDU:
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x73b700 dump:
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 1404 = 0x057c
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr: Info
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 34695839615
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   esm_class: 3 = 0x0003
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 1 =
 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   data_coding: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sm_length: 10 = 0x000a
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   short_message: test 16:48
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.*
 
 
and this is our log for the deiver_sm:
 
 
  *2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG: SMPP[ISMSAD]: Sending PDU:
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x73fd30 dump:
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   type_name: deliver_sm
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   command_id: 5 = 0x0005
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 2 = 0x0002
 2011-03-01 16:50:04 [634] [5] DEBUG

RE: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst src) are expected INVETED in the deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)

[info.ubichip]

Thanks for your answer again.

which opensmppbox are you using ? I just checked the svn repository, it looks 
some dlr source code is now inside the opensmppbox, perhaps there is a good way 
to make correction inside direclty ?

I'm not sure to understand kannel will be past memory, do you quit the 
telecom world or kannel is going to die ?

Best regards

-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de 
Niel
Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2012 13:58
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst  src) are expected INVETED in the 
deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)


Hi,

This is intended for swapping the src and dest for delivery report for clients 
connected using opensmppbox. 

If you are using the same bearerbox for other purposes, such as http smsc 
and/or proxy, the delivery reports src and dest will also be swapped around.
You might need to swap the fields in the get-url or via script.

Personally I use a different bearerbox for each gateway, and a separate one for 
opensmppbox, due to smsbox not being able to deal with any form of real load. 
Each bearerbox has it's own mysql dlr table, and I only apply the trigger to 
the ones using opensmppbox.

Luckily, soon kannel will be past memory; a horror story to tell my kids around 
the campfire :)

Regards,



info.ubichip wrote:
 
 Thanks a lot, I will try it very soon.
 
 one more question : does it change the way the dlr are coming back to 
 the originator of the request through SMPP ?
 
 -Message d'origine-
 De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la 
 part de Niel Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2012 13:25 À : users@kannel.org 
 Objet : RE: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst  src) are expected INVETED in 
 the deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)
 
 
 Yes, that is where the trigger should be. My kannel config has been 
 set to use the table kannel.dlr, and columns dest and src.
 
 The MySQL command would look something like this:
 
 delimiter $
 CREATE TRIGGER `kannel`.`dlr_src_dest_swap_trigger`
   BEFORE INSERT ON `kannel`.`dlr`
   FOR EACH ROW
   BEGIN
 DECLARE temp VARCHAR(100);
 SET temp = NEW.src;
 SET NEW.src = NEW.dest;
 SET NEW.dest = temp;
   END
 $
 
 Other useful commands:
 
 SHOW TRIGGERS;
 DROP TRIGGER `dlr_src_dest_swap_trigger`; SHOW CREATE TRIGGER 
 `dlr_src_dest_swap_trigger`;
 
 Regards,
 
 
 
 info.ubichip wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 is it possible to have your mysql trigger on the DLR table ?
 
 thanks in advance
 
 -Message d'origine-
 De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la 
 part de Niel Envoyé : mardi 20 mars 2012 07:54 À : users@kannel.org 
 Objet : Re: OpenSMPP+Kannel: DLR: (dst  src) are expected INVETED in 
 the deliver_sm (but remains as in submit_sm)
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I know this is old, but, this issue still exists in the latest SVN.
 
 My brearbox is set to use mysql storage for DLRs. As workaround I 
 added a mysql trigger on the DLR table before insert that swaps the 
 src and dest values.
 
 Regards,
 
 
 
 Dídac Royo wrote:
 
 Hi Users,
 
 I need your help.
 
  We have a problem in our Kannel + openSMPPbox. The values of
 parameters:
 dst  src are expected INVETED in the deliver_sm, I'm I correct?
 
 
 In the logs *source_addr*  *destination_addr* have the same in both
 *
 submit_sm* and *deliver_sm* operations (when we expect them inverted 
 in the
 deliver_sm)
 
 
This is our log for the submit_sm:
 
 
 *2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[ISMSAD]: Got PDU:
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x73b700 dump:
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 1404 =
 0x057c
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   source_addr: Info
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 34695839615
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   esm_class: 3 = 0x0003
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 1 =
 0x0001
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   data_coding: 0 = 0x
 2011-03-01 16:50:00 [634] [6] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0

OpenSMPPBOX and DLR source code

[info.ubichip]

Hello all,

does someone got some information on the last svn version of smppbox, I checked 
the source code but I'm not sure of the exact additionnal feature such the DLR 
source code is now in the same folder, and there is a new directive MULTI-GROUP 
which is not well explained in the example.

any help will be appreciate,

Best regards

RE: Responsibility for inversion of source and destination address for DLR

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

I'm currently facing a similar issue using opensmppbox.

Does someone has been able to find a patch or any resolution of this issue ?

Thanks in advance for your answer


-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part
de Nikos Balkanas
Envoyé : lundi 1 août 2011 04:27
À : Mike Nelson; us...@vm1.kannel.org
Objet : Re: Responsibility for inversion of source and destination address
for DLR

Hi,

Bb has assumed this responsibility since almost 10 years now. It inverts
addresses to the original before submitting to the endpoint (smsbox). Since
then a number of add-on boxes have been developed since (sqlbox, smppbox). 
It seems to me, that since they were created as add-ons to bb, they should
abide by the bb communication API. That means that they should treat
addresses as original and handle them according to their needs.

If bb were to change, so would smsbox. Since both of these preexisted the
other boxes, it seems to me that these boxes should align themselves to bb,
not the other way around.

If you decide to patch your bb, the code is in gw/dlr.c: 436 in dlr_find(). 
Bear in mind that if you do so, you will be branching off and future updates
may need merging.

BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Mike Nelson
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:43 PM
Subject: Responsibility for inversion of source and destination address for
DLR


Hello All,

I was wondering if anyone might be able to help explain to me what box has
the responsibility of inverting source and destination addresses in DLRs. 
If possible, a pointer to where in the source code this is *supposed* to
happen would also be helpful. I emphasize supposed to because it is my
understanding from reading prior threads that there is an erroneous
inversion of these fields in smsc_smpp.c's handle_pdu function.

Here is some background on the motivation of this question. I am trying to 
troubleshoot a problem with a closed-source kannel smppbox.   The issue is 
that the source and destination address of the deliver_sm (DLR) message is
the same as the source and destination in the submit_sm message.  My
understanding is that this is not the proper default behavior -- that
instead the source_addr of the DLR should be the destination_addr of the
submit_sm and vice-versa. I wish to determine whether the problem is
stemming from within this smppbox, or if the problem is in my bearerbox
configuration.  I am still new to kannel though, so I am not sure where one
would normally expect to see the inversion of these two fields occur.  By
the way, the DLRs come downstream from an http smsc, but I don't think the
configuration of this smsc could be the problem since the look-up in the DLR
database is only being based on the dlr-mid and smsc-id -- the 'to' field
seems to basically be ignored.

I have been trying to trace my way through the kannel source code to
determine where you would normally see the source_addr and destination_addr
fields be swapped when constructing a DLR, but so far I have not been able
to spot it.  To me, it seems as though the source_addr always gets assigned
as the source and the destination_addr always gets assigned as the
destination when dropping this information into the DLR database and when
pulling it out of the DLR database.  It seems as though they continue to be
uninverted as they are converted into 'msg'es, and these msg's are then sent
to the smppbox for delivery to the ESME.  Is this how it works though, or
have the source_addr and destination_addr already been inverted at some
point during the process of handing the message from smppbox to bearerbox to
DLR database and back out?  I have been staring at too much code lately, so
I am hoping that someone can show me what I have missed.  That is, can
someone explain at what step the source_addr (sender) of the submit_sm
message should get placed into the role of destination_addr, or receiver,
for the DLR's deliver_sm PDU?

Many thanks,

Mike 

RE: Weird sms behaviour

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

yes to clone a sim card became difficult with enhanced security of sim card. 
But to put an application on a phone to get/send sms is quite straight forward.

regards


-Message d'origine-
De : Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : mardi 5 avril 2011 11:07
À : info.ubichip; 'Alvaro Cornejo'; 'users'
Objet : Re: Weird sms behaviour

Hi,

This is not possible... Most likely provider's HLR went whacky over that 
weekend and was fixed afterwards. Let's not scare users unnecessarily ;-)

BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - 
From: info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr
To: 'Alvaro Cornejo' cornejo.alv...@gmail.com; 'users' 
users@kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 8:26 AM
Subject: RE: Weird sms behaviour


Hello Alvaro,

may I suggest an application which has been put in your wife phone which
handle all the SMS traffic. SMS are received on specific port on phone, like
a TCP port on a computer machine, so it could be some virus catch the
sms/dlr before it is going to the normal reader sms application ?

another possibility is someone cloned the sim card...

hope it helps

-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part
de Alvaro Cornejo
Envoyι : mercredi 30 mars 2011 07:58
ΐ : users; kannel_dev_mailinglist
Objet : Weird sms behaviour

Hi

Sorry for this cross posted question to the lists but I need help on
this issue that is not related to kannel but with sms behaviour. I DO
REALLY need some light on this.

My wife have a phone that, during a weekend, was not able to receive
any sms but was able to send messages that arrived with no problems to
destinations. The only weird thing she noticed was that she did not
received any incomming message nor the delivery notifications she has
her phone configured to automatically ask for.

The next Monday after that, chatting with a friend of her -that lives
in Argentina (we live in Peru)-, he told her that during that weekend
he received several messages not intended for him. And when going
through those messages; they were messages sent to my wifes phone.
They do some tests and he sent her a couple of messages that he
received back on his phone as if he has sent them to himself. I also
sent her a couple of test sms and she did not received them but his
friend; also some other persons send her messages and all of them
arrived to my wife friend phone in Argentina!!!.

My wife's friend also received some delivery confirmations that the
messages were sucessfully delivered to MY cellphone nevertheless I
do not know personally this person, nor I have his cellphone number
nor he got mine!!! I assume that those dlr were to sms that she sent
to me during the weekend and were forwarded, as the other messages to
my wife's friend phone.

I checked her phone and found no way to do such a sms forwarding. It
is a Sony-Ericsson walkman phone.

Sometime this same Monday, without doing any change to her phone,
everything seemed to went back to normal. This problem hasn't repeated
since then.

This is so embarrasing and is obviously creating suspiciuos about me
spying my wife. Even more that, for my wife --at least ;D-- I'm an sms
gurϊ since I work in this business for many years To be honest, in
her shoes, I'll think the same.

The only conclusion I can come to is that somehow, during that
weekend, my wifes phone was automatically forwarding sms to his friend
phone. Phone/voice calls were not affected in any way.

Does anyone know of a similar situation of have a better idea of what
could happen?

I would REALLY appreciate any input on this.

Regards

Alvaro


|---
--|
Envνe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perϊ, Mιxico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com

RE: Weird sms behaviour

[info.ubichip]

Hello Alvaro,

may I suggest an application which has been put in your wife phone which
handle all the SMS traffic. SMS are received on specific port on phone, like
a TCP port on a computer machine, so it could be some virus catch the
sms/dlr before it is going to the normal reader sms application ?

another possibility is someone cloned the sim card...

hope it helps

-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part
de Alvaro Cornejo
Envoyé : mercredi 30 mars 2011 07:58
À : users; kannel_dev_mailinglist
Objet : Weird sms behaviour

Hi

Sorry for this cross posted question to the lists but I need help on
this issue that is not related to kannel but with sms behaviour. I DO
REALLY need some light on this.

My wife have a phone that, during a weekend, was not able to receive
any sms but was able to send messages that arrived with no problems to
destinations. The only weird thing she noticed was that she did not
received any incomming message nor the delivery notifications she has
her phone configured to automatically ask for.

The next Monday after that, chatting with a friend of her -that lives
in Argentina (we live in Peru)-, he told her that during that weekend
he received several messages not intended for him. And when going
through those messages; they were messages sent to my wifes phone.
They do some tests and he sent her a couple of messages that he
received back on his phone as if he has sent them to himself. I also
sent her a couple of test sms and she did not received them but his
friend; also some other persons send her messages and all of them
arrived to my wife friend phone in Argentina!!!.

My wife's friend also received some delivery confirmations that the
messages were sucessfully delivered to MY cellphone nevertheless I
do not know personally this person, nor I have his cellphone number
nor he got mine!!! I assume that those dlr were to sms that she sent
to me during the weekend and were forwarded, as the other messages to
my wife's friend phone.

I checked her phone and found no way to do such a sms forwarding. It
is a Sony-Ericsson walkman phone.

Sometime this same Monday, without doing any change to her phone,
everything seemed to went back to normal. This problem hasn't repeated
since then.

This is so embarrasing and is obviously creating suspiciuos about me
spying my wife. Even more that, for my wife --at least ;D-- I'm an sms
gurú since I work in this business for many years To be honest, in
her shoes, I'll think the same.

The only conclusion I can come to is that somehow, during that
weekend, my wifes phone was automatically forwarding sms to his friend
phone. Phone/voice calls were not affected in any way.

Does anyone know of a similar situation of have a better idea of what
could happen?

I would REALLY appreciate any input on this.

Regards

Alvaro


|---
--|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
              Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com

RE: OpenSMPPbox users

[info.ubichip]

Thanks for your answer.

what about a client I would like to remove ? is it possible to do it without
restarting opensmppbox ?


-Message d'origine-
De : Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi 2 février 2011 18:29
À : info.ubichip; 'Kannel list'
Objet : Re: OpenSMPPbox users

Simple. Before you tell a new ESME to connect, you add him to the clients 
file, so that when he connects he authenticates correctly, all without 
interruption of service to others (restarting smppbox). After that, you 
don't need to worry about that client again, he will always have access.

BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - 
From: info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr
To: 'Kannel list' users@kannel.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 8:39 PM
Subject: OpenSMPPbox users


 Hello,

 about one opensmmpbox, I see the following feature : SMPP Users are 
 defined
 in a flat text file, which is parsed at client connection (binding) time.
 This means that users can be added, changed or removed without restarting
 open smppbox. The file can be edited by any plain-text file editor.

 How do you know how the opensmppbox is reloading this flat text and how
 often ?

 thanks in advance for your help.

 

OpenSMPPbox throttle and spamassassin

[info.ubichip]

Hello all,

happy new chinese year.

Does someone if the opensmppbox have the throttle feature to limit client to
send to many sms at a time ? if yes, how to implement it ?


I'm wondering as well if anyone implement a spam assassin in it? I am
looking for a function which could stop any content with bad word (mostly
viagra or any sex related).

thanks in advance for your help

RE: OpenSMPPbox users

[info.ubichip]

Ok, that makes sense. Does there is a way to tell the opensmppbox to 
stop/restart time to time in order to be sure a customer will be disconnect (I 
plan to put this add/remove client feature with a spam assassin in order to 
remove automatically all customers which send non authorized content)? 

thanks

-Message d'origine-
De : Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : jeudi 3 février 2011 19:02
À : info.ubichip; us...@vm1.kannel.org
Objet : Re: OpenSMPPbox users

Same procedure. Next time he tries to log in, he will be rejected. Doesn't 
affect ongoing session, though. For that you can ask the client politely to 
disconnect,  and if that fails kill the connection process (as root).

BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - 
From: info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr
To: 'Nikos Balkanas' nbalka...@gmail.com; 'Kannel list' 
us...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:20 PM
Subject: RE: OpenSMPPbox users


Thanks for your answer.

what about a client I would like to remove ? is it possible to do it without
restarting opensmppbox ?


-Message d'origine-
De : Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com]
Envoyι : mercredi 2 fιvrier 2011 18:29
ΐ : info.ubichip; 'Kannel list'
Objet : Re: OpenSMPPbox users

Simple. Before you tell a new ESME to connect, you add him to the clients
file, so that when he connects he authenticates correctly, all without
interruption of service to others (restarting smppbox). After that, you
don't need to worry about that client again, he will always have access.

BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - 
From: info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr
To: 'Kannel list' users@kannel.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 8:39 PM
Subject: OpenSMPPbox users


 Hello,

 about one opensmmpbox, I see the following feature : SMPP Users are
 defined
 in a flat text file, which is parsed at client connection (binding) time.
 This means that users can be added, changed or removed without restarting
 open smppbox. The file can be edited by any plain-text file editor.

 How do you know how the opensmppbox is reloading this flat text and how
 often ?

 thanks in advance for your help.

OpenSMPPbox users

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

about one opensmmpbox, I see the following feature : SMPP Users are defined
in a flat text file, which is parsed at client connection (binding) time.
This means that users can be added, changed or removed without restarting
open smppbox. The file can be edited by any plain-text file editor.

How do you know how the opensmppbox is reloading this flat text and how
often ?

thanks in advance for your help.

RE: Problem receiving DLR with modem. Error : got +CMT but pdu_extract failed

[info.ubichip]

Hello Jonathan,

do you solve your issue ? if yes, how did you do it ?

thanks in advance for your answer

-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de 
Jonathan GILLES
Envoyé : lundi 13 décembre 2010 23:10
À : users@kannel.org
Objet : Problem receiving DLR with modem. Error : got +CMT but pdu_extract 
failed

Hi all,

This is my first mail to the mailling list, hope you will understand my  poor 
english !

I've just setup a new kannel install (1.4.3) with a sony ericsson k750i  gsm 
phone as Modem.
Everything is working fine (I can send sms and received MO) but I don't  have 
the DLR for sms I sent.
As I can see kannel is receiving the DLR but can't decode the PDU.
Does anyone already face this kind of problem ?

Here is bearbox log :

2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] INFO: AT2[sonyk750]: opening device
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: device opened.  Telnet 
mode = 0
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: device opened
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] INFO: AT2[sonyk750]: Logging in
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] INFO: AT2[sonyk750]: init device
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] INFO: AT2[sonyk750]: speed set to 9600
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- ATZ^M
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- AT^M
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- AT
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- ATF^M
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- ATF
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- ATE0^M
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- ATE0
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: --  AT+IFC=2,2^M
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: --  
AT+CSCA=+33660003000^M
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- AT+CMGF=0^M
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:29 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- AT+CSMS=?^M
2010-12-14 06:25:30 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- +CSMS: (0)
2010-12-14 06:25:30 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:30 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: --  AT+CNMI=2,3,0,1,0;^M
2010-12-14 06:25:30 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:30 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: --  AT+CPMS=ME^M
2010-12-14 06:25:30 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- +CPMS:  
0,198,0,40,0,198
2010-12-14 06:25:30 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:30 [26679] [6] INFO: AT2[sonyk750]: AT SMSC  successfully 
opened.
2010-12-14 06:25:32 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- AT^M
2010-12-14 06:25:32 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:32 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- AT+CPMS?^M
2010-12-14 06:25:32 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- +CPMS:  
ME,0,198,SM,0,40,ME,0,198
2010-12-14 06:25:32 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:25:56 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]:  TP-Validity-Period: 24.0 
hours
2010-12-14 06:25:56 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: --  AT+CMGS=20^M
2010-12-14 06:25:56 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- 
2010-12-14 06:25:56 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: send command  status: 1
2010-12-14 06:25:56 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: --  
0031000A816089840053A708F4F29C0E9A36A7
2010-12-14 06:25:56 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- ^Z
2010-12-14 06:26:00 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- 
2010-12-14 06:26:00 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- +CMGS: 0
2010-12-14 06:26:00 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- OK
2010-12-14 06:26:00 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: send command  status: 0
2010-12-14 06:26:00 [26679] [6] DEBUG: DLR[mysql]: Adding DLR  smsc=sonyk750, 
ts=0, src=13013, dst=0698480035, mask=31, boxc=
2010-12-14 06:26:00 [26679] [6] DEBUG: sql: INSERT INTO dlr (smsc, ts,  source, 
destination, service, url, mask, boxc, status) VALUES  ('sonyk750', '0', 
'13013', '0698480035', 'k750i',  
'http://localhost/connecteur/receiveDLR.php?dlr-status=%dtimesent=%tsmscid=%Fsmsid=apitest_29403c71b8e83fed5f882a1b51c8b020',
  '31', '', '0');
2010-12-14 06:26:00 [26679] [6] DEBUG: SMSC[sonyk750]: creating DLR  message
2010-12-14 06:26:00 [26679] [6] DEBUG: SMSC[sonyk750]: DLR =  
http://localhost/connecteur/receiveDLR.php?dlr-status=%dtimesent=%tsmscid=%Fsmsid=apitest_29403c71b8e83fed5f882a1b51c8b020

2010-12-14 06:26:08 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: -- +CDS: 29
2010-12-14 06:26:08 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: --  
06810A81608984005301214160030040012141600340400040CF5F0012
2010-12-14 06:26:08 [26679] [6] DEBUG: AT2[sonyk750]: received message  from 
SMSC: 

Reload OpenSMPPbox users

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

to complete my last email, I checked the source code, and it is written if
the bearerbox receive a restart or similar command, it should pass to the
opensmppbox, I tried but as far I know it looks not working. So if someone
have any other idea ?

thanks in advance

-Message d'origine-
De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part
de info.ubichip
Envoyé : mercredi 2 février 2011 10:40
À : 'Kannel list'
Objet : OpenSMPPbox users

Hello,

about one opensmmpbox, I see the following feature : SMPP Users are defined
in a flat text file, which is parsed at client connection (binding) time.
This means that users can be added, changed or removed without restarting
open smppbox. The file can be edited by any plain-text file editor.

How do you know how the opensmppbox is reloading this flat text and how
often ?

thanks in advance for your help.

RE: ESME Client not connecting to OpenSmppbox

[info.ubichip]

Hello David,

 

I got exact similar issue, and I tried to correct with the *.*.*.* IP
parameter given by Rene, but right now no success.

If you correct your issue, could you please tell us how you did it ?

 

thanks in advance for your support

 

De : users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part
de Rene Kluwen
Envoyé : vendredi 14 janvier 2011 12:46
À : 'David Ige: Cellulant'; users@kannel.org
Objet : RE: ESME Client not connecting to OpenSmppbox

 

In /etc/smpplogin.txt, try:

1234512345vma *.*.*.*

 

== Rene

 

From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of David Ige: Cellulant
Sent: Friday, 14 January, 2011 14:54
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: ESME Client not connecting to OpenSmppbox

 

Hello everyone,

I have installed opensmppbox on a centOS server and have configured it with
a client, but the client is not able to connect. When the client tries to
connect it gives  SMSC rejected login to transmit, code 0x000d (Bind
Failed). Couldn't connect to SMS center (retrying in 10 seconds).


On the server side, it gives this error, Invalid SMPP PDU received.



Server Bearerbox log



2011-01-15 13:07:37 [26155] [5] INFO: Client connected from 127.0.0.1 
2011-01-15 13:07:37 [26155] [5] DEBUG: Started thread 45
(gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
2011-01-15 13:07:37 [26155] [45] DEBUG: Thread 45 (gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
maps to pid 26155.
2011-01-15 13:07:37 [26155] [45] DEBUG: Started thread 46
(gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
2011-01-15 13:07:37 [26155] [46] DEBUG: Thread 46 (gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
maps to pid 26155.
2011-01-15 13:07:40 [26155] [45] INFO: Connection closed by the box
127.0.0.1
2011-01-15 13:07:40 [26155] [46] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to box:
127.0.0.1
2011-01-15 13:07:40 [26155] [46] DEBUG: Thread 46 (gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
terminates.
2011-01-15 13:07:40 [26155] [45] DEBUG: Thread 45 (gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
terminates.
2011-01-15 13:07:48 [26155] [5] INFO: Client connected from 127.0.0.1 
2011-01-15 13:07:48 [26155] [5] DEBUG: Started thread 47
(gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
2011-01-15 13:07:48 [26155] [47] DEBUG: Thread 47 (gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
maps to pid 26155.
2011-01-15 13:07:48 [26155] [47] DEBUG: Started thread 48
(gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
2011-01-15 13:07:48 [26155] [48] DEBUG: Thread 48 (gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
maps to pid 26155.
2011-01-15 13:07:51 [26155] [47] INFO: Connection closed by the box
127.0.0.1
2011-01-15 13:07:51 [26155] [48] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to box:
127.0.0.1
2011-01-15 13:07:51 [26155] [48] DEBUG: Thread 48 (gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
terminates.
2011-01-15 13:07:51 [26155] [47] DEBUG: Thread 47 (gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
terminates.
2011-01-15 13:07:59 [26155] [5] INFO: Client connected from 127.0.0.1 
2011-01-15 13:07:59 [26155] [5] DEBUG: Started thread 49
(gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
2011-01-15 13:07:59 [26155] [49] DEBUG: Thread 49 (gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
maps to pid 26155.
2011-01-15 13:07:59 [26155] [49] DEBUG: Started thread 50
(gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
2011-01-15 13:07:59 [26155] [50] DEBUG: Thread 50 (gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
maps to pid 26155.
2011-01-15 13:08:02 [26155] [49] INFO: Connection closed by the box
127.0.0.1
2011-01-15 13:08:02 [26155] [50] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to box:
127.0.0.1
2011-01-15 13:08:02 [26155] [50] DEBUG: Thread 50 (gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
terminates.
2011-01-15 13:08:02 [26155] [49] DEBUG: Thread 49 (gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
terminates.




Server Opensmppbox log
2011-01-15 13:06:40 [28249] [25] INFO: Client connected from 40.100.0.000
2011-01-15 13:06:40 [28249] [25] DEBUG: Connecting to 127.0.0.1
2011-01-15 13:06:40 [28249] [25] INFO: Connected to bearerbox at localhost
port 13001.
2011-01-15 13:06:40 [28249] [25] DEBUG: Started thread 26
(opensmppbox.c:smpp_to_bearerbox)
2011-01-15 13:06:40 [28249] [26] DEBUG: Thread 26
(opensmppbox.c:smpp_to_bearerbox) maps to pid 28249.
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG: SMPP[opensmppbox]: Got PDU:
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x4ea0170 dump:
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   type_name: bind_transceiver
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   command_id: 9 = 0x0009
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 13 = 0x000d
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   system_id: 12345
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   password: 12345
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   system_type: vma
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   interface_version: 52 = 0x0034
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   addr_ton: 0 = 0x
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG:   address_range: NULL
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG: SMPP[opensmppbox]: Sending PDU:
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x4ea38a0 dump:
2011-01-15 13:06:41 [28249] [26] 

issue with DLR and destination Field

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

 

In 2005, I make a small patch in dlr_mysql.c for the  for people using kannel 
with modems.  At this time the patch was using the triplet TS, SMSC, and DST to 
find the right dlr and then make update/delete operation

 

I realized there has been some modification of the 1.5.0 release and my patch 
has been reformated.

Now my previous solution  is working if the field dst is passed to the function 
dlr_remove or dlr_update and it depend on a field which the name is use_dst. 
But despict my search, I don't know how to set up ON this use_dst (in a 
configuration file or in kannel conf ???).

 

Does someone met similar issue ?

 

thanks in advance for your help and  happy new year

RE: Does Kannel Support CDMA Modem

[info.ubichip]

Hello,
 
Kannel does not support CDMA natively but it could be done using some other
code and http smsc.
 
regards
 

  _  

From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Anshu Sah
Sent: mardi 11 mai 2010 06:50
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Does Kannel Support CDMA Modem


Hello

Do you think Kannel Support CDMA Modems??

--
Regards
Anshu

RE: FastTrack WaveCom reverts to text mode instead of PDU

[info.ubichip]

Hello,
 
do you still have this pbs ?

  _  

From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: mardi 27 avril 2010 08:03
To: Francis Vidal; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: FastTrack WaveCom reverts to text mode instead of PDU


Hi,
 
Please post modem configuration and detailed bb logs with modem
initialization.
 
BR,
Nikos

- Original Message - 
From: Francis  mailto:francisv.l...@gmail.com Vidal 
To: users@kannel.org 
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:47 AM
Subject: FastTrack WaveCom reverts to text mode instead of PDU

Hi all, 

Is there a way to fix the value of CMGF in FastTrack WaveCom modems to
AT+CMGF=0 instead of AT+CMGF=1? If I set this to AT+CMGF=0, it always
reverts to +CMGF=1 for no apparent reason. I even added it to the
keepalive-cmd string to make sure it doesn't switch back to text mode. I'm
using Kannel 1.4.3 on RHEL.

RE: Portech MV-37x vs Kannel 1.4.3

[info.ubichip]

Hello,
 
thanks a lot, I wrote quite the same code to use the portech, but to have it as 
a patch is great. It could be good to have it for the next kannel release.
 
May I ask you if you reach good speed to send sms with this modem ? We got 
issue with the telnet, the longest the sms is, the longer the time to send sms 
is. I asked Portech about this issue, and they said it comes from the telnet 
process. unfortunetly, it is not priority one to solve it !
 
 
thanks

  _  

From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of 
Raivis Rengelis
Sent: lundi 8 mars 2010 13:45
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Portech MV-37x vs Kannel 1.4.3


Hi,

For all of you craving to pair these two, here is my solution - 
http://www.rrkb.lv/musings/?p=13 not very useful IMO, because all incoming 
calls are hung up by kannel.

wbr
RR 

RE: webgui based dashboard for kannel to perform FCAPS

[info.ubichip]

I'm interested as well, please send me the link to this opensource module 

-Original Message-
From: rajashanmugam [mailto:savet...@gmail.com] 
Sent: mardi 18 novembre 2008 07:01
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: webgui based dashboard for kannel to perform FCAPS


hi,
well ya ofcourse
it monitors all the demons runnin and initiated , it has a capability to
even force shutdown n remote startup facility to . the billing portion is
quite comprehensive with satistical analysis too.
pls let me your requirement we would fall back the architecture is on
opensource software components cheers


CanL wrote:
 
 Sounds just right for problems we face. is it also capable of 
 monitoring other services like billing, message Qs, dameons etc. What will
it cost?
 can you implement it remotely or you need to be physcially present?
 Do reply.
 
 cheers
 
   
 
 rajashanmugam wrote:
 
 hi,
 I have developed php-CGI/jScript based webbased dashboard which can 
 perform the status monitoring, fault management, configuration 
 management, change management and many more I have also included 
 SOURCE BASED ROouting which is somethin not much available and needed 
 more than everythin by the operators I am tryin 2 integrate OpenNMS 
 with Kannel for better visibility and availability of services pls 
 let me knw if somebody is interested in know more about it
 
 
 

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/webgui-based-dashboard-for-kannel-to-perform-FCAPS-tp2
0539000p20561253.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Compatibility

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

I got experience with teltonika, siemens, simcom, and wavecom
For the speed, teltonika and wavecom are quite good, siemens looks to be the
more verbose for the error code, simcon, I didn't send enough sms to give a
good feedback.

Regarding the siemens M55i, I would be very interested in some of you could
give me some feedback regarding speed performance?

Regards
 

-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Iain Dooley
Sent: samedi 27 fevrier 2010 02:12
To: LoLoVioLo
Cc: us...@vm1.kannel.org
Subject: Re: Compatibility

I ordered a USB/power of USB GSM modem unit from KLS electronic in China off
alibaba.com and it works really well. I've been using them consistently with
Kannel, and using custom scripts that I wrote using the command line utility
cu and they've been very solid.

Cheers,
Iain

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, LoLoVioLo wrote:

 Hi all,

 Sorry it is another compatibility request. The compatibility list 
 appears poor concerning devices that work as SMSC.

 The fact is that I am actually using a siemens s35 which is really 
 perfect to send sms but hardly manage both receive and send on heavy
traffic situation.
 After a while, incoming SMS are stored into internal memory instead of 
 passing to kannel then refuse incoming SMS as memory is full.
 I tried siemens s45, sony ericsson t600 but can't find a real stable 
 way (phone power down, phone freeze, etc.)

 So I am thinking about using a dedicated GSM modem instead of a mobile 
 phone to avoid this problems (the simpler the best).
 The 3 models in compatibility list (nokia premicell, siemens m20, 
 wavecom
 wm02) appears quite old and hard to find.

 My aim is to have a dual band rs232 GSM modem as stable as possible 
 able to send and receive SMS without discard any of them.
 Wavecom appears still very active on the GSM modem business.
 Especially do you have any experience with wavecom Fastrack M1206B ?

 For those who have system running at 10 SMS/min (send and receive) for 
 months
 - please share your experience.

 Thanks.

 LoLoVioLo

Modem Siemens MC55i

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

Does anyone got some experience with this modem ?
I figure some slow sending process : it took almost 12 to 20 secondes to send a 
sms regarding the normal which should be 5 to 8 secondes.

Here is my modems.conf for this modem :

detect-string = SIEMENS
need-sleep = true
sendline-sleep = 1000
speed = 115200
keepalive-cmd = AT+CSQ
enable-mms = false
init-string = AT+CNMI=2,2,0,1,1;+CMEE=2;+CFUN=1;+CPMS=\ME\,\ME\
enable-hwhs = AT\\Q3
message-storage = ME
no-pin =true
broken = true

RE: Telnet device

[info.ubichip]

 
Hello,

Some update on my issues :
I managed to modify the sms_at code in order to send the command 'module'
after the login and password. And the first issue has been resolved by
bypassing the speed detection the at2_device_thread function. I know it is
not probably the best way to do it but right now it is working and it is not
disturbing other modem I got on this kannel server.

If someone got an idea to make this modification more reliable, I 'm open to
all suggestions.

Best regards


-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: jeudi 18 fevrier 2010 00:17
To: Iain Dooley
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Telnet device

I dunno. If you actually see the logs, portech doesn't seem to send ^Ms
back. Maybe just needs a line feed?  ^J?

PS: Definitely Windows is not the way to go. Aside from using an inflexible
lining scheme, they do not allow you to experiment with it.

Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Iain Dooley i...@workingsoftware.com.au
To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Cc: us...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: Telnet device


actually, on reading this full thread (i had only glanced at the most
recent message before) it looks to me like the portech code is using
different line endings ... like it's programmed to use only a dos line
ending or something.

interesting experiment: compile kannel on windows and see if you get the
same problem.

cheers
iain

PS: KLS electronic in china make an excellent and cost effect usb/power
over usb unit. i found them on alibaba.com and have used several of their
units both directly from custom code i wrote using PHP and from kannel on
freebsd (haven't tried with other OS')

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Iain Dooley wrote:

 vim 4 eva!

 On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Nikos Balkanas wrote:

 Yeap. That was my original observation to Alvaro who originally proposed
 it. However, this is a modem, not vim, and Alvaro is one of the most
 experienced with it in the group ;-)

 Coincidence or just staying with tradition in vim?

 BR,
 Nikos
 - Original Message - From: Iain Dooley
 i...@workingsoftware.com.au
 To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
 Cc: info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr; us...@vm1.kannel.org
 Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:46 AM
 Subject: Re: Telnet device


 Interesting side note, if you're using vim and need to generate ^M, you
 don't type ^ and then M, ie. shift + 6, then shift + M, you have to type:

 ctrl + v ctrl + m

 then you see ^M ... you can also type ctrl + v ctrl + enter which 
 produces
 ^@

 cheers
 iain

 On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Nikos Balkanas wrote:

 Please post configuration.

 BR,
 Nikos
 - Original Message - From: info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr
 To: 'Alvaro Cornejo' cornejo.alv...@gmail.com; users@kannel.org
 Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:07 AM
 Subject: RE: Telnet device


 Hello all,

 Just to make an update, I still got my two issues. It appears the modem
 generated a carriage return before the login string 'username:', it 
 should
 disturb the login process. If someone got any clue or idea to make
 modification ?

 The ^M looks not working as well to insert a carriage return in the
 different init-string. Does anyone have been got similar need to 
 integrate
 with telnet device or so ?

 Thanks in advance

 -Original Message-
 From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On 
 Behalf
 Of info.ubichip
 Sent: mardi 16 fιvrier 2010 22:00
 To: 'Alvaro Cornejo'
 Cc: users@kannel.org
 Subject: RE: Telnet device

 Yes, I tried it but it looks I got issue before because the 
 login/password
 is not filled in the protocol. I was wondering if something is not well
 implemented in the telnet dialogue. Do you have any clue on this before 
 ?

 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: opening device
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: Connecting to 192.168.1.121
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: device opened.
 Telnet mode = 1
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- ^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:52 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:57 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- username: AT
 2010-02-15 13:44:03 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- password: **
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- bad username

 The 'username:' string is not recognize, I took a look on hte source 
 code
 in
 smsc_at.c but there is nothing that could explain that.




 -Original Message-
 From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com]
 Sent: mardi 16 fιvrier 2010 20:57
 To: info.ubichip
 Cc: users@kannel.org
 Subject: Re: Telnet device

 Did you tried ^M  carret char plus M char ?? This is a sort of 
 character
 representation of a carriage return...

 Regards

 Alvaro

 On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr
 wrote

RE: Help Needed

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

I'm using teltonika serial without any issue.

regards 

-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: jeudi 18 février 2010 01:03
To: Abbas Qaizar
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Help Needed

Any USB GSM modem should work fine with Linux and kannel. Huwei modems have
gotten good specs and speed.

BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Abbas Qaizar ab...@mustafacomputers.com
To: 'Nikos Balkanas' n...@amdtelecom.net
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: Help Needed


 Hi All,
 Ok. Thanks for your swift reply.

 I will go for LINUX in that case but just let me know how to check the
 compatibility of TELTONIKA GSM Modem  with Kannel ??? Or Should I use any
 Mobile phone with USB cable as I don't have any SERIAL PORT in my 
 computer.

 Warmest Regards,

 Abbas Qaizar

 From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:n...@amdtelecom.net]
 Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 1:35 PM
 To: Abbas Qaizar; users@kannel.org
 Subject: Re: Help Needed

 Hi,

 I don't know if it will find it easier in windows. The only way to run it 
 in

 windows is through Cygwin - you have to download and install it. However,
 cygwin is just as tricky as Linux, plus is slower (emulation) and less
 stable. After you setup cygwin, just follow the installation instructions 
 in

 User's manual. They are the same for both Unix and Cygwin.

 BR,
 Nikos
 - Original Message - 
 From: Abbas Qaizar ab...@mustafacomputers.com
 To: users@kannel.org
 Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:28 AM
 Subject: Help Needed


 February 18, 2010.

 Dear All,

 I am a newbie in a LINUX environment and learning it everyday through
 tutorials. I know it would take some time so I have no complaints.
 I intend to develop a SMS (sending and receiving) system for our 
 community
 members (around 2000 people). I have gone through the installation and
 user
 guides of KANNEL and have even installed it but I find it quite difficult
 to
 manage in a LINUX environment till I complete my tutorials.

 Can someone advise me how to setup KANNEL in any WINDOWS OS ? Which type
 of
 Modem or Mobile phone can be used ? Has anyone used TELTONIKA brand of 
 GSM
 (USB Based) Modems in Kannel application because these are the only brand
 easily available in our local market ?

 Is there any step - by - step guidelines available from any list member
 ???

 I would greatly appreciate a swift and positive reply from the members.

 Have a nice day 

 Regards

 A NEWBIE


 

RE: Telnet device

[info.ubichip]

 Hello all,

Just to make an update, I still got my two issues. It appears the modem
generated a carriage return before the login string 'username:', it should
disturb the login process. If someone got any clue or idea to make
modification ?

The ^M looks not working as well to insert a carriage return in the
different init-string. Does anyone have been got similar need to integrate
with telnet device or so ?

Thanks in advance

-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of info.ubichip
Sent: mardi 16 février 2010 22:00
To: 'Alvaro Cornejo'
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Telnet device

Yes, I tried it but it looks I got issue before because the login/password
is not filled in the protocol. I was wondering if something is not well
implemented in the telnet dialogue. Do you have any clue on this before ?

 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: opening device
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: Connecting to 192.168.1.121
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: device opened.
 Telnet mode = 1
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- ^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:52 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:57 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- username: AT
 2010-02-15 13:44:03 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- password: **
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- bad username

The 'username:' string is not recognize, I took a look on hte source code in
smsc_at.c but there is nothing that could explain that.


 

-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com]
Sent: mardi 16 février 2010 20:57
To: info.ubichip
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Telnet device

Did you tried ^M  carret char plus M char ?? This is a sort of character
representation of a carriage return...

Regards

Alvaro

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr wrote:
 In this modem, you could have both in the same telnet session, you 
 just have to tell to the modem to go in the AT mode, which is done by 
 entering the command 'module' and then we are in full AT command.

 So I got two issues :
        - first to tell kannel to connect to it with the correct 
 login/password which looks to be not the cas
        - second, I have to tell the modem to go in the AT mode, which 
 I assume I could do it by passing the command in the init-string of 
 the modem (as soon as the init-string accept the carriage return).

 If you have any tricks to help me for the first point ?

 Thanks in advance

 -Original Message-
 From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com]
 Sent: mardi 16 février 2010 11:02
 To: info.ubichip
 Cc: users@kannel.org
 Subject: Re: Telnet device

 I don´t know your modem, but in the cases I know, port 23 is for 
 managing the modem configs and such.

 For using AT interface they usually use a different port. with the 
 same Telnet protocol... something like Telnet host:2100

 Regards

 |-
 |--
 --|
 Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier 
 celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use 
 aplicaciones
 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online
              Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y 
 www.pravcom.com



 On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:06 PM, info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr
wrote:
 Hello,

 Does someone got similar issue ?

 Regards


 -Original Message-
 From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On 
 Behalf Of info.ubichip
 Sent: lundi 15 février 2010 13:49
 To: users@kannel.org
 Subject: Using Portech modem

 Hello All,

 I would like to use a portech GSM gateway MV-370 on a kannel 1.4.3 
 version, I'm able to send basic sms by hand using telnet as the 
 following
 example :

 Telnet 192.168.1.121

 username:voip
 password:
 User level = admin

 Command : logout,module,module1,module2
module
 Getting module 1..
 Got!! Press 'ctrl-x' to release module 1.

 at+cmgf=1
 OK
 At+cmgs=1122334455
test
 +CMGS:30


 So I make a configuration in kannel as follow :
 group = smsc
 smsc = at
 smsc-id = portech
 allowed-smsc-id = portech
 log-level = 0
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/portech.log
 device = telnet
 host = 192.168.1.121
 port = 23
 login-prompt = username:
 password-prompt = password:
 smsc-username = voip
 smsc-password = 1234
 modemtype = portech
 validityperiod = 172
 keepalive = 10
 my-number = 0012345678
 sim-buffering = true


 I got the following error, it is like the telnet session is not 
 initialized correctly :

 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: trying to use 
 speed 115200 from modem definition
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: opening device
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: Connecting to 192.168.1.121
 2010-02-15

RE: Telnet device

[info.ubichip]

 In sms_at.c, the following function looks not make the good thing :

static int at2_login_device(PrivAT2data *privdata)
{
info(0, AT2[%s]: Logging in, octstr_get_cstr(privdata-name));

at2_read_buffer(privdata, 0);
gwthread_sleep(0.5);
at2_read_buffer(privdata, 0);

if((octstr_len(privdata-username) == 0 ) 
(octstr_len(privdata-password) 0)) {
at2_wait_modem_command(privdata, 10, 3, NULL);  /* wait for
Password: prompt */
at2_send_modem_command(privdata,
octstr_get_cstr(privdata-password), 2,0); /* wait for OK: */
at2_send_modem_command(privdata, AT, 2,0); /* wait for OK: */
}
else if((octstr_len(privdata-username)  0 ) 
(octstr_len(privdata-password) 0)) {
at2_wait_modem_command(privdata, 10, 2, NULL);  /* wait for Login:
prompt */
at2_send_modem_command(privdata,
octstr_get_cstr(privdata-username), 10,3); /* wait fo Password: */
at2_send_modem_command(privdata,
octstr_get_cstr(privdata-password), 2,0); /* wait for OK: */
at2_send_modem_command(privdata, AT, 2,0); /* wait for OK: */
}

return 0;
}

In my case the telnet device is the 'else if' case, looking first for a
carriage return then the login prompt, then the password prompt and then
send the first 'AT'. For an unknown reason, it send the first 'AT4 too
early.

Soes someone got idea of modification to be made ?

thanks

-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of info.ubichip
Sent: mercredi 17 février 2010 22:07
To: 'Alvaro Cornejo'; users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Telnet device

 Hello all,

Just to make an update, I still got my two issues. It appears the modem
generated a carriage return before the login string 'username:', it should
disturb the login process. If someone got any clue or idea to make
modification ?

The ^M looks not working as well to insert a carriage return in the
different init-string. Does anyone have been got similar need to integrate
with telnet device or so ?

Thanks in advance

-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of info.ubichip
Sent: mardi 16 février 2010 22:00
To: 'Alvaro Cornejo'
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Telnet device

Yes, I tried it but it looks I got issue before because the login/password
is not filled in the protocol. I was wondering if something is not well
implemented in the telnet dialogue. Do you have any clue on this before ?

 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: opening device
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: Connecting to 192.168.1.121
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: device opened.
 Telnet mode = 1
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- ^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:52 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:57 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- username: AT
 2010-02-15 13:44:03 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- password: **
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- bad username

The 'username:' string is not recognize, I took a look on hte source code in
smsc_at.c but there is nothing that could explain that.


 

-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com]
Sent: mardi 16 février 2010 20:57
To: info.ubichip
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Telnet device

Did you tried ^M  carret char plus M char ?? This is a sort of character
representation of a carriage return...

Regards

Alvaro

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr wrote:
 In this modem, you could have both in the same telnet session, you 
 just have to tell to the modem to go in the AT mode, which is done by 
 entering the command 'module' and then we are in full AT command.

 So I got two issues :
        - first to tell kannel to connect to it with the correct 
 login/password which looks to be not the cas
        - second, I have to tell the modem to go in the AT mode, which 
 I assume I could do it by passing the command in the init-string of 
 the modem (as soon as the init-string accept the carriage return).

 If you have any tricks to help me for the first point ?

 Thanks in advance

 -Original Message-
 From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com]
 Sent: mardi 16 février 2010 11:02
 To: info.ubichip
 Cc: users@kannel.org
 Subject: Re: Telnet device

 I don´t know your modem, but in the cases I know, port 23 is for 
 managing the modem configs and such.

 For using AT interface they usually use a different port. with the 
 same Telnet protocol... something like Telnet host:2100

 Regards

 |-
 |--
 --|
 Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier 
 celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use 
 aplicaciones
 2 vias via SMS y GPRS

Telnet device

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

Does someone got similar issue ?

Regards
 

-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of info.ubichip
Sent: lundi 15 février 2010 13:49
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Using Portech modem

Hello All,

I would like to use a portech GSM gateway MV-370 on a kannel 1.4.3 version,
I'm able to send basic sms by hand using telnet as the following example :

Telnet 192.168.1.121

username:voip
password:
User level = admin

Command : logout,module,module1,module2
module
Getting module 1..
Got!! Press 'ctrl-x' to release module 1.

at+cmgf=1
OK
At+cmgs=1122334455
test
+CMGS:30


So I make a configuration in kannel as follow :
group = smsc
smsc = at
smsc-id = portech
allowed-smsc-id = portech
log-level = 0
log-file = /var/log/kannel/portech.log
device = telnet
host = 192.168.1.121
port = 23
login-prompt = username:
password-prompt = password:
smsc-username = voip
smsc-password = 1234
modemtype = portech
validityperiod = 172
keepalive = 10
my-number = 0012345678
sim-buffering = true


I got the following error, it is like the telnet session is not initialized
correctly :

2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: trying to use speed
115200 from modem definition
2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: opening device
2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: Connecting to 192.168.1.121
2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: device opened. Telnet
mode = 1
2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- ^M
2010-02-15 13:43:52 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
2010-02-15 13:43:57 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- username: AT
2010-02-15 13:44:03 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- password: **
2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- bad username or
password!!!
2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- exit...
2010-02-15 13:44:12 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
2010-02-15 13:44:21 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: Closing device
2010-02-15 13:44:21 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: speed in modem
definition don't work, will autodetect


Does someone got similar issue with this type of modem ?

My second question is : as you could see after the telnet connection, I have
to specify the command 'module' to get full access to the AT command of the
modem, does there is a way to put it in the init-string in the modem
definition ? If yes how to send a carriage return in the init-string
parameter (I have already some AT+CNMI' command to process.


Thanks in advance for your help

RE: Telnet device

[info.ubichip]

In this modem, you could have both in the same telnet session, you just have
to tell to the modem to go in the AT mode, which is done by entering the
command 'module' and then we are in full AT command.

So I got two issues :
- first to tell kannel to connect to it with the correct
login/password which looks to be not the cas
- second, I have to tell the modem to go in the AT mode, which I
assume I could do it by passing the command in the init-string of the modem
(as soon as the init-string accept the carriage return).

If you have any tricks to help me for the first point ?

Thanks in advance

-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com] 
Sent: mardi 16 février 2010 11:02
To: info.ubichip
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Telnet device

I don´t know your modem, but in the cases I know, port 23 is for managing
the modem configs and such.

For using AT interface they usually use a different port. with the same
Telnet protocol... something like Telnet host:2100

Regards

|---
--|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones
2 vias via SMS y GPRS online
  Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com



On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:06 PM, info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr wrote:
 Hello,

 Does someone got similar issue ?

 Regards


 -Original Message-
 From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On 
 Behalf Of info.ubichip
 Sent: lundi 15 février 2010 13:49
 To: users@kannel.org
 Subject: Using Portech modem

 Hello All,

 I would like to use a portech GSM gateway MV-370 on a kannel 1.4.3 
 version, I'm able to send basic sms by hand using telnet as the following
example :

 Telnet 192.168.1.121

 username:voip
 password:
 User level = admin

 Command : logout,module,module1,module2
module
 Getting module 1..
 Got!! Press 'ctrl-x' to release module 1.

 at+cmgf=1
 OK
 At+cmgs=1122334455
test
 +CMGS:30


 So I make a configuration in kannel as follow :
 group = smsc
 smsc = at
 smsc-id = portech
 allowed-smsc-id = portech
 log-level = 0
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/portech.log
 device = telnet
 host = 192.168.1.121
 port = 23
 login-prompt = username:
 password-prompt = password:
 smsc-username = voip
 smsc-password = 1234
 modemtype = portech
 validityperiod = 172
 keepalive = 10
 my-number = 0012345678
 sim-buffering = true


 I got the following error, it is like the telnet session is not 
 initialized correctly :

 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: trying to use 
 speed 115200 from modem definition
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: opening device
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: Connecting to 192.168.1.121
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: device opened. 
 Telnet mode = 1
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- ^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:52 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:57 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- username: AT
 2010-02-15 13:44:03 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- password: **
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- bad username 
 or password!!!
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- exit...
 2010-02-15 13:44:12 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:44:21 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: Closing device
 2010-02-15 13:44:21 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: speed in modem 
 definition don't work, will autodetect


 Does someone got similar issue with this type of modem ?

 My second question is : as you could see after the telnet connection, 
 I have to specify the command 'module' to get full access to the AT 
 command of the modem, does there is a way to put it in the init-string 
 in the modem definition ? If yes how to send a carriage return in the 
 init-string parameter (I have already some AT+CNMI' command to
process.


 Thanks in advance for your help

RE: Telnet device

[info.ubichip]

Yes, I tried it but it looks I got issue before because the login/password
is not filled in the protocol. I was wondering if something is not well
implemented in the telnet dialogue. Do you have any clue on this before ?

 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: opening device
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: Connecting to 192.168.1.121
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: device opened.
 Telnet mode = 1
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- ^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:52 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:57 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- username: AT
 2010-02-15 13:44:03 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- password: **
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- bad username 

The 'username:' string is not recognize, I took a look on hte source code in
smsc_at.c but there is nothing that could explain that.


 

-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com] 
Sent: mardi 16 février 2010 20:57
To: info.ubichip
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Telnet device

Did you tried ^M  carret char plus M char ?? This is a sort of character
representation of a carriage return...

Regards

Alvaro

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr wrote:
 In this modem, you could have both in the same telnet session, you 
 just have to tell to the modem to go in the AT mode, which is done by 
 entering the command 'module' and then we are in full AT command.

 So I got two issues :
        - first to tell kannel to connect to it with the correct 
 login/password which looks to be not the cas
        - second, I have to tell the modem to go in the AT mode, which 
 I assume I could do it by passing the command in the init-string of 
 the modem (as soon as the init-string accept the carriage return).

 If you have any tricks to help me for the first point ?

 Thanks in advance

 -Original Message-
 From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com]
 Sent: mardi 16 février 2010 11:02
 To: info.ubichip
 Cc: users@kannel.org
 Subject: Re: Telnet device

 I don´t know your modem, but in the cases I know, port 23 is for 
 managing the modem configs and such.

 For using AT interface they usually use a different port. with the 
 same Telnet protocol... something like Telnet host:2100

 Regards

 |-
 |--
 --|
 Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier 
 celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use 
 aplicaciones
 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online
              Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y 
 www.pravcom.com



 On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:06 PM, info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr
wrote:
 Hello,

 Does someone got similar issue ?

 Regards


 -Original Message-
 From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On 
 Behalf Of info.ubichip
 Sent: lundi 15 février 2010 13:49
 To: users@kannel.org
 Subject: Using Portech modem

 Hello All,

 I would like to use a portech GSM gateway MV-370 on a kannel 1.4.3 
 version, I'm able to send basic sms by hand using telnet as the 
 following
 example :

 Telnet 192.168.1.121

 username:voip
 password:
 User level = admin

 Command : logout,module,module1,module2
module
 Getting module 1..
 Got!! Press 'ctrl-x' to release module 1.

 at+cmgf=1
 OK
 At+cmgs=1122334455
test
 +CMGS:30


 So I make a configuration in kannel as follow :
 group = smsc
 smsc = at
 smsc-id = portech
 allowed-smsc-id = portech
 log-level = 0
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/portech.log
 device = telnet
 host = 192.168.1.121
 port = 23
 login-prompt = username:
 password-prompt = password:
 smsc-username = voip
 smsc-password = 1234
 modemtype = portech
 validityperiod = 172
 keepalive = 10
 my-number = 0012345678
 sim-buffering = true


 I got the following error, it is like the telnet session is not 
 initialized correctly :

 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: trying to use 
 speed 115200 from modem definition
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: opening device
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: Connecting to 192.168.1.121
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: device opened.
 Telnet mode = 1
 2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- ^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:52 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:43:57 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- username: AT
 2010-02-15 13:44:03 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- password: **
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- bad username 
 or password!!!
 2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- exit...
 2010-02-15 13:44:12 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
 2010-02-15 13:44:21 [32013] [8] INFO

Using Portech modem

[info.ubichip]

Hello All,

I would like to use a portech GSM gateway MV-370 on a kannel 1.4.3 version,
I'm able to send basic sms by hand using telnet as the following example :

Telnet 192.168.1.121

username:voip
password:
User level = admin

Command : logout,module,module1,module2
module
Getting module 1..
Got!! Press 'ctrl-x' to release module 1.

at+cmgf=1
OK
At+cmgs=1122334455
test
+CMGS:30


So I make a configuration in kannel as follow :
group = smsc
smsc = at
smsc-id = portech
allowed-smsc-id = portech
log-level = 0
log-file = /var/log/kannel/portech.log
device = telnet
host = 192.168.1.121
port = 23
login-prompt = username:
password-prompt = password:
smsc-username = voip
smsc-password = 1234
modemtype = portech
validityperiod = 172
keepalive = 10
my-number = 0012345678 
sim-buffering = true


I got the following error, it is like the telnet session is not initialized
correctly :

2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: trying to use speed
115200 from modem definition
2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: opening device
2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: Connecting to 192.168.1.121
2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: device opened. Telnet
mode = 1
2010-02-15 13:43:50 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- ^M
2010-02-15 13:43:52 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
2010-02-15 13:43:57 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- username: AT
2010-02-15 13:44:03 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- password: **
2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- bad username or
password!!!
2010-02-15 13:44:08 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- exit...
2010-02-15 13:44:12 [32013] [8] DEBUG: AT2[portech]: -- AT^M
2010-02-15 13:44:21 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: Closing device
2010-02-15 13:44:21 [32013] [8] INFO: AT2[portech]: speed in modem
definition don't work, will autodetect


Does someone got similar issue with this type of modem ?

My second question is : as you could see after the telnet connection, I have
to specify the command 'module' to get full access to the AT command of the
modem, does there is a way to put it in the init-string in the modem
definition ? If yes how to send a carriage return in the init-string
parameter (I have already some AT+CNMI' command to process.


Thanks in advance for your help

RE: telnet device

[info.ubichip]

Hello Alvaro, Nikos,

First thanks to your help,

I will receive the equipment soon, and I will update you about that.
I already take a look on the source of ths smsc_at, but there is no indication 
of any carriage return 'feature' so I'm hope the ^M will not be see as a two 
normal asciis characters if there is no mapping.

If not, I think the solution will be to add some how one second init-string in 
the modem definitions. Is a init-string2 exist ?


What do you think about ?

-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com] 
Sent: vendredi 22 janvier 2010 09:51
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: info.ubichip; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: telnet device

Nikos

A loong time ago I used to do some scripting (procomm, windows terminal 
emulator) with modems and I used ^M and ^J (character carret and character 
letter) and not CTRL+M nor CTRL+J in order to send CR and LF to modems and it 
worked with no problems.

Lets wait info.ubchip tell us in that worked.

Regards

Alvaro


|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular 
y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via 
SMS y GPRS online
  Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y 
www.pravcom.com



2010/1/22 Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com:
 Thanks Alvaro,

 I don't know if this works with modems but these are control codes 
 related to vt100 terminal emulation. ^M is carriage return, ^J line 
 feed (not with carret, however, but control). They are eventually 
 mapped to ASCII characters (0x0D  0x0A). If some modem types 
 implement them in their init strings, I doubt that it is a standard. Glad to 
 know, though.

 BR,
 Nikos
 - Original Message - From: Alvaro Cornejo
 cornejo.alv...@gmail.com
 To: info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr
 Cc: users@kannel.org
 Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 3:30 PM
 Subject: Re: telnet device


 Try^M carret and upper case M

 is an ASCII ?? representation of the carriage return.

 I do use old xyplex terminal server to connect a bank of modems to 
 kannel using rawtcp mode in smsc_at config with no problems.

 Regards

 Alvaro



 |-|
 Env?e y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier 
 celular y Nextel en el Per?, M?xico y en mas de 180 paises. Use 
 aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online
 Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y 
 www.pravcom.com



 On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:24 PM, info.ubichip info.ubic...@free.fr wrote:

 Hello,

 Do you know if it is possible to put some carriage return in the 
 init-string of a modem. In my case, the modem is a telnet one and I 
 have to make a non standard command before access to AT command.

 I would to have something like
 Init-string = hellocommand[carriagereturn]AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0


 Thanks in advance for your help

telnet device

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

Do you know if it is possible to put some carriage return in the init-string
of a modem. In my case, the modem is a telnet one and I have to make a non
standard command before access to AT command.

I would to have something like 
Init-string = hellocommand[carriagereturn]AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0


Thanks in advance for your help

+CMT pdu_extract failed with DLR

[info.ubichip]

Hello all,

First of all I wish you a happy new year and a lot of SMS !!!

I got an issue with kannel 1.4.3 with teltonika modem :

After sending a sms, I got some answer for the DLR but it looks kannel is
not able to handle it

2009-12-31 13:59:12 [12952] [6] DEBUG: AT2[lava]: -- +CDS: 33
2009-12-31 13:59:12 [12952] [6] DEBUG: AT2[lava]: --
07917150979603F206060B916140335873F7902113319585299021134100102900
2009-12-31 13:59:12 [12952] [6] DEBUG: AT2[lava]: received message from
SMSC: +17057969302
2009-12-31 13:59:12 [12952] [6] ERROR: AT2[lava]: got +CMT but pdu_extract
failed

I checked in the mailing list archive, it appears to happen with siemens M20
and other modems like wavecom.

Does someone got similar issue ?

Limit in allowed-prefix ?

[info.ubichip]

Hello all,

We need to put a huge list on number in allowed-prefix, does someone know if
there is any limitations for the size of the field ?

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: Fastest Modem for Kannel

[info.ubichip]

I will be very pleased if you could tell us more about this modem and the
configuration of your kannel !

Could you please tell us more ? Which network are you using ?
Are you using dlr ?

Any MO SMS coming back ?

What is the quality of service on it ?

Regards
 

-Original Message-
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: vendredi 8 mai 2009 20:20
To: info.ubichip
Cc: 'Alvaro Cornejo'; kenbell...@gmail.com; users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Fastest Modem for Kannel

Hello,
Thanks for the comment. In my case I test to send 1000 MT and it finished in
around 19.6 minutes. And re test it again and finished in
20.1 minutes. 



Willy


On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 18:38 -0700, info.ubichip wrote:
 Hello Sangprabv,
 
 One sms per second look to be a little bit optimistic, our tests (on 
 large volume during hours) on different brand name such as Nokia, 
 Siemens and wavecom indicate more something like 1 sms every 5-6 
 second. So I am more agree with Alvaro result.
 
 One SMS per second should be obtain by GPRS bearer but I never got the 
 chance to test it !
 
 Hope it helps
 
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On 
 Behalf Of sangprabv
 Sent: jeudi 7 mai 2009 20:14
 To: Alvaro Cornejo
 Cc: kenbell...@gmail.com; users@kannel.org
 Subject: Re: Fastest Modem for Kannel
 
 I forget the model but I use some such as Wavecom and Siemens for COMM 
 type and Itegno for USB. Mostly I can send 1 SMS/second but I disable 
 all DLR and ACK and working with SQLBox installed and configure the
throughput to 1.
 
 
 
 Willy
 
 
 On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 20:27 -0500, Alvaro Cornejo wrote:
  1 msg/sec ?
  
  Wich modem did you use with what carrier? the most i could get is 56
 msg/5min...
  
  Regards
  
  Alvaro
  
  
 
 |-
 |--
 --|
  Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde 
  cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 
  paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online
Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y 
  www.pravcom.com
  
  
  
  On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:55 PM, sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com wrote:
   IMHO a GSM Modem may send only 1 SMS/second. And a serial 
   connection
   (COMM) will be more stable than a USB one, CMIIW.
  
  
  
   Willy
  
  
   On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 01:22 +0100, Kenny wrote:
   Hi,
  
   For a Kannel deployment, what type of modem would be faster? USB 
   or Comm interface modem.
  
   I will appreciate your input.
  
  
   --
   Kenny
   OCA | ECSA | RHCE
  
   p: +2348034939090
   e: ke...@nuobjects.com
   w: www.nuObjects.com
  
   Bulk SMS Solutions | Managed Hosting | Enterprise Application 
   Development
  
  
  
 
 
 

RE: Fastest Modem for Kannel

[info.ubichip]

Hello Sangprabv,

One sms per second look to be a little bit optimistic, our tests (on large
volume during hours) on different brand name such as Nokia, Siemens and
wavecom indicate more something like 1 sms every 5-6 second. So I am more
agree with Alvaro result.

One SMS per second should be obtain by GPRS bearer but I never got the
chance to test it !

Hope it helps


 

-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of sangprabv
Sent: jeudi 7 mai 2009 20:14
To: Alvaro Cornejo
Cc: kenbell...@gmail.com; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Fastest Modem for Kannel

I forget the model but I use some such as Wavecom and Siemens for COMM type
and Itegno for USB. Mostly I can send 1 SMS/second but I disable all DLR and
ACK and working with SQLBox installed and configure the throughput to 1.



Willy


On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 20:27 -0500, Alvaro Cornejo wrote:
 1 msg/sec ?
 
 Wich modem did you use with what carrier? the most i could get is 56
msg/5min...
 
 Regards
 
 Alvaro
 
 

|---
--|
 Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier 
 celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use 
 aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online
   Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y 
 www.pravcom.com
 
 
 
 On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:55 PM, sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com wrote:
  IMHO a GSM Modem may send only 1 SMS/second. And a serial connection
  (COMM) will be more stable than a USB one, CMIIW.
 
 
 
  Willy
 
 
  On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 01:22 +0100, Kenny wrote:
  Hi,
 
  For a Kannel deployment, what type of modem would be faster? USB or 
  Comm interface modem.
 
  I will appreciate your input.
 
 
  --
  Kenny
  OCA | ECSA | RHCE
 
  p: +2348034939090
  e: ke...@nuobjects.com
  w: www.nuObjects.com
 
  Bulk SMS Solutions | Managed Hosting | Enterprise Application 
  Development
 
 
 

TCP modem and kannel

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

Does someone got some experience with TCPRAW modem ?
Are you using rawclient or rawserver mode in the tcp modem ?
Does someone got some similar experience with RFC 2217 ?
I'm able to connect to the tcp modem but it looks not to answer to the AT
command.




Thanks in advance for your help

RE: Fwd: kannel mrtg script

[info.ubichip]

I tried it, it looks work.

For the received messages and DLR, it is good to have it, so you can know if
your qos is good.

The all smsc looks to be buggy if I put many instance of kannel in the php
script

Regards


-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Cornejo [mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com] 
Sent: mardi 27 janvier 2009 07:26
To: Kyriacos Sakkas
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: kannel  mrtg script

Hi Kyriacos

I thought the received counter were only MO... so I was doing the maths you
state below.

Thanks for your comments

Alvaro
|---
--|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones
2 vias via SMS y GPRS online
  Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com



On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Kyriacos Sakkas kyria...@netsmart.com.cy
wrote:
 Alvaro Cornejo wrote:
 Hi

 Attached is the mrtg to kannel script. It will pass smsc info to mrtg 
 for graphing.

 SNIP


 I'm not a programmer nor a scripting guy so the script can look 
 weird/strange/confuse/etc/etc/etc.. :-(( ... but It works  : - ))

 Finally, in my kannel config, in the received counter I get the 
 Incomming + Outgoing... :( I don't know why, so for showing the right 
 value, I make the difference between Inc  out counters..

 If someone use the script an enhaced it, please share the result and 
 if possible, keep my credits on it ;)

 Regards

 Alvaro

 Hi Alvaro,

 Very handy and will try to give it a go here, to see how it operates.

 Regarding your question about the received counter, this includes not 
 the Outgoing messages, but the count of the DLR messages received 
 (They are incoming messages of a kind).
 Depending on how you are tunning DLRs, you might be able to 
 approximate the true received count by doing TrueReceived=Received - 
 Outgoing*X where X in most cases would be 2.

 Kyriacos

 --
 Kyriacos Sakkas
 Development Team
 Netsmart
 Tel: + 357 22 452565
 Fax: + 357 22 452566
 Email: kyria...@netsmart.com.cy
 http://www.netsmart.com.cy

 Taking Business to a New Level!

 ** Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email 
 message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.
 If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, 
 distribution, or copying of this  email message is strictly prohibited.
 If you think that you have received this email message in error, 
 please email the sender at kyria...@netsmart.com.cy **

RE: Supervision of kannel using hyperic

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

I didn't know Nagios yet. I understand hyperic is some of autodiscovery of
majority of the services on a machine. Nagios looks more complexe, isn't it
?

Do you have any nagios plus ins for kannel ?

Regards
 

-Original Message-
From: seikath [mailto:seik...@gmail.com] 
Sent: mercredi 21 janvier 2009 22:48
To: info.ubichip
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Supervision of kannel using hyperic

i think hyperic source has GPL 2 license as well

anyway i use Nagios,
damn easy new plugins implementation,
and, there is nice firefox plugin for status monitoring ... :)

cheers


info.ubichip wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 Does anyone got some feedback using such software like hyperic to 
 manage and watch Kannel indicator (eg Sent SMS, received, DLR ...)?
 
 Thanks in advance for your help
 
 
 
 

Supervision of kannel using hyperic

[info.ubichip]

Hello all,

Does anyone got some feedback using such software like hyperic to manage and
watch Kannel indicator (eg Sent SMS, received, DLR ...)?

Thanks in advance for your help

RE: Removing an erroring message stuck in queue / file store

[info.ubichip]

Hello,
 
when you trash the .store file, don't forget to remove the .store.bak as
well otherwise, it will retry to send all the remaining message.
 
regards
 

  _  

From: Tony Kirkham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: lundi 1 décembre 2008 21:32
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Removing an erroring message stuck in queue / file store


Is there a way to remove a message from the file store that is erroring
continuously allowing the other messages to be sent?

If I simply restart Kannel sometimes the other messages get sent and
sometimes they do not.  Why is that?
If they all get sent but the erroring message I can simply replace the file
store with another file with a restart of Kannel, but I would like to know
if there is a way to remove the message by some other means.

Thanks,

-Tony

RE: Fastest Speed GSM Modem

[info.ubichip]

Hello,
 
basically the process to send a sms is 6 to 8 seconds, so it will be
difficult to handle 1000+ sms per hour, or you have to several ones.
 
hope it helps
 

  _  

From: Abbas Qaizar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: mercredi 22 octobre 2008 08:16
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Fastest Speed GSM Modem


Dear List members, 
 
Can anyone from Kannel users advise about the fastest speed GSM Modem
(either USB or Serial ) ? Must be able to handle 1000 + (or more SMS) in an
hour. 
 
Thanks  Kind Regards
 
Abbas Qaizar 
Mustafa Computers  Peripherals 
 
 

RE: Fastest Speed GSM Modem

[info.ubichip]

Hello,

We are using Nokia module and we are able to handle this kind of amount of
SMS but less in you want to have DLR.

Regards
 

-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: mercredi 22 octobre 2008 14:48
To: Abbas Qaizar
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Fastest Speed GSM Modem

Abbas Qaizar schrieb:
 Dear List members,
  
 Can anyone from Kannel users advise about the fastest speed GSM Modem 
 (either USB or Serial ) ? Must be able to handle 1000 + (or more SMS) 
 in an hour.

rumors say that the Wavecom Fasttrack GSM modems have the fastest PDU
processing. Vendors of GSM modem pools (racked 4,6,8 devices to one rack
mountable device) claim to handle 4800 MTs with 8 nodes in 1 hour.

Which calculates to 4800 / 8 == 600 per second on ONE device.

So, if you want to maintain a high throughput via GSM modems, you need a
really large pool of them. But then you run into other problems, lice base
antenna cell capacity if all located at the same spot, so geo-co-locationing
is an issue and and and.

Stipe

--
---
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

tolj.org system architecture  Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/  http://www.kannel.org/

mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org   mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
---

RE: Multiple connections

[info.ubichip]

Hello,
 
try to take a look on the priority value when you send the sms.
 
hope it help

  _  

From: Gustavo Mohme C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: lundi 8 septembre 2008 10:56
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Multiple connections


Hi All,
I've been successfully using Kannel for over a month now and it's working
rather well! Here is my scenario:
I'm using the latest stable version of Kannel and connect to an SMSC using
SMPP. I only have 1 SMPP connection at the moment. On an average day i send
around 70,000 sms which I separate on two batches. The problem is that
during the sending process(which in total takes around 5 hours each day), if
someone sends an sms, it will be processed and queued until all the previous
messages have been sent. This means that during 5 hours each day, users will
not get an immeadiate reply. To solve this, I was thinking on asking my smsc
for another connection and use two connections: 1 transmitter for sending
daily sms and 1 transeiver for sending and replying sms. Is such a
configuration possible? Is there a better solution to my problem?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Gustavo

RE: Multiple connections

[info.ubichip]

make test and try and you will see, or take a look in the source code !
 
tell us if your problem has been solved in order to share your experience
with the kannel community.
 
regards
 

  _  

From: Gustavo Mohme C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: lundi 8 septembre 2008 12:48
To: info.ubichip
Subject: Re: Multiple connections


thanks! Just one thing, 0 is the highest priority right?


On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:30 PM, info.ubichip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello,
 
try to take a look on the priority value when you send the sms.
 
hope it help

  _  

From: Gustavo Mohme C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: lundi 8 septembre 2008 10:56
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Multiple connections


Hi All,
I've been successfully using Kannel for over a month now and it's working
rather well! Here is my scenario:
I'm using the latest stable version of Kannel and connect to an SMSC using
SMPP. I only have 1 SMPP connection at the moment. On an average day i send
around 70,000 sms which I separate on two batches. The problem is that
during the sending process(which in total takes around 5 hours each day), if
someone sends an sms, it will be processed and queued until all the previous
messages have been sent. This means that during 5 hours each day, users will
not get an immeadiate reply. To solve this, I was thinking on asking my smsc
for another connection and use two connections: 1 transmitter for sending
daily sms and 1 transeiver for sending and replying sms. Is such a
configuration possible? Is there a better solution to my problem?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Gustavo

RE: stress test

[info.ubichip]

do you separate the database ?
 

  _  

From: Mario Noboa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: mercredi 27 août 2008 08:12
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: stress test


Hi List,

I'm making a stress test with my operator. They sent me 10 000 messages, and
told me that i have to response in 4 mins and 10 seconds (40 msg/sec).  But
kannel response in 4 min and 40 seconds.

I tried modifying the values of max-pending-submits (50) and with  but i
can't make that Kannel response faster,


anyone have any idea?

thanks a lot guys!

RE: stress test

[info.ubichip]

you have to test all the modules independantly.
 
di you try fake sms to stree your system ?
 
 

  _  

From: Christian Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: mercredi 27 août 2008 11:09
To: Mario Noboa; info. ubichip
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: stress test



Hard to say, but see if the memory DLR storage (“internal”) makes a
difference. It might be getting bogged down.

 

Try tuning your logs down as well – maybe even off.

 

From: Mario Noboa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:16 AM
To: info. ubichip
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: stress test

 

Yes I'm responding with a service, in this way:

group = sms-service
keyword = default
text = %a
accepted-smsc = OP1
omit-empty = true

I'm using postgres for dlr with another operator...  Do you think that
affects?

thanks for your help!

Mario

 

2008/8/27 info.ubichip [EMAIL PROTECTED]

do you separate the database ?

 

 

  _  

From: Mario Noboa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: mercredi 27 août 2008 08:12
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: stress test

Hi List,

I'm making a stress test with my operator. They sent me 10 000 messages, and
told me that i have to response in 4 mins and 10 seconds (40 msg/sec).  But
kannel response in 4 min and 40 seconds.

I tried modifying the values of max-pending-submits (50) and with  but i
can't make that Kannel response faster,

anyone have any idea?

thanks a lot guys!