[USMA:14110] Re: Decimal point or decimal comma?

2001-06-30 Thread kilopascal

2001-06-30

But, isn't (wasn't) the British point not on the line as the American point
is now, but at the vertical centre of the number?  Something like: 3.14159?
I think the hand-held calculator (not the PC) are all made with points, not
commas. Even in countries that use commas. This coupled with the wide use of
English world-wide might through a process of evolution cause the comma to
be displaced by the point.


John

Keiner ist hoffnungsloser versklavt als derjenige, der irrtümlich glaubt
frei zu sein.

There are none more hopelessly enslaved then those who falsely believe they
are free!

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)



- Original Message -
From: Joseph B. Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: U.S. Metric Association [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 2001-06-29 21:51
Subject: [USMA:14106] Decimal point or decimal comma?


Decimal notation was proposed by Juan of Seville in the 12th century.  He
would have written pi as 3-1416/1 (I can't format this in Eudora).  In
1585 the Dutchman, Simon Stevin proposed 3(0)1(1)4(2)1(3)6(4).  This was
simplified by Frençois Viète of France to 3|1416, which in continental
European languages became 3,1416 (the comma is virgule in French, Komma in
German, coma in Spanish,
komma in Dutch and Swedish, còmma in Italian).  Albert Mettler's metric
survey of 1975 found that 24 counteries of continental Europe use the comma
as decimal marker.

In Britain John Napier of Edinburgh in 1617 decided to use the point or
period as his decimal marker, and it has spread throughout the
English-speaking world, as well as in several Asian countries.


Joseph B. Reid
17 Glebe Road West
TorontoM5P 1C8   Tel. 416 486-6071





[USMA:14111] Re: Euro logistics

2001-06-30 Thread kilopascal

2001-06-30

Business Week is an American publication.  Don't expect them to be
Europhiles. I remember when the Euro was first introduced in 1999 and the
American media hype against it.  This same hype is going to resurface in the
next 6 months as the Euro comes into full force.

Keep in mind, that the American Economic gurus are afraid of the Euro.  They
know that as long as the dollar stands alone and the world supports it,
American abuses of resources and cash can continue unabated.  The US should
have been bankrupt long ago, but constant investment by foreigners keeps
America's debt burden from overpowering and destroying America.

The moment that investment is withdrawn into something else, there will
chaos in the American markets as the debt shield crumbles.  The only thing
that can take away from the dollar is a currency that has the potential to
rival the dollar in power.  And that currency is the Euro.  It is in
America's interest to play up the fears of E-day in the hopes of keeping the
Euro from ever challenging the dollar.

But, Everyone knows, that once the conversion date passes and the Euro
markets destabilise, it will be a dawn for the Euro and dusk for the dollar.

And what will be said in the next year about Europe was able to convert
their entire economy from 10 different currencies to 1, and American can't
even make a simple switch in measuring systems?  Where will world confidence
turn when people realise who the real achievers in the world are?


John

Keiner ist hoffnungsloser versklavt als derjenige, der irrtümlich glaubt
frei zu sein.

There are none more hopelessly enslaved then those who falsely believe they
are free!

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)



- Original Message -
From: Louis JOURDAN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: U.S. Metric Association [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 2001-06-29 17:07
Subject: [USMA:14109] Re: Euro logistics


At 16:09 -0400 01/06/29, Nat Hager III wrote:
Interesting article on the logistics of Euro-conversion, from next week's
Business Week International.  Makes US metric conversion look like a walk
in
the park.

Yeah... At least Euro-conversion is thoroughly prepared, whilst the
US metric conversion...

Seriously, don't give too much credit to this article. Euro is
already a reality for many people, and conversion will go smoothly.
If some journalists want to make it a nightmare, that is their
problem.

Interesting : do you know how I get the euro symbol ¤ with my new
MacOS (9.1) ? by typing option-$. In other words the euro is just
an alternative to the dollar ?

Louis





[USMA:14112] Willkommen bei euro-aktuell - dem Infodienst der Sparkassen und des Wirtschafts

2001-06-30 Thread kilopascal

2001-06-30

Countdown to the Euro page.

 http://www.euro-aktuell.de/


begin 666 Willkommen bei euro-aktuell - dem Infodienst der Sparkassen und des 
Wirtschaftsmagazins DM.url
M6T1%1D%53%1=#0I05-%55),/6AT=' Z+R]W=WN975R;RUA:W1U96QL+F1E
M+PT*#0I;26YT97)N9713:]R=-U=%T-E523#UH='1P.B\O=W=W+F5UF\M
J86MT=65L;YD92\-DUO9EF:65D/30P1C5$030Y,SP,4,Q,#$U,@T*
`
end




[USMA:14115] http://www.aktion-euro.de/html/

2001-06-30 Thread kilopascal

14. Wie lange gelten die DM-Briefmarken?

  Die Briefmarken werden seit Herbst 2000 bis zur Einführung des
Euro-Bargelds schrittweise mit doppelter Währungsauszeichnung herausgegeben.
Ab dem 1.1.2002 werden die Briefmarken generell in Cent ausgezeichnet. Die
auf Deutsche Pfennig lautenden Briefmarken bleiben bis zum 30.6.2002 gültig,
können also bis zu diesem Datum verwendet werden. Danach können diese
Briefmarken gegen solche mit Cent umgetauscht werden. Eine Rücknahme gegen
Bargeld ist allerdings nicht vorgesehen. Die Umtauschaktion liegt im
Zuständigkeitsbereich der Deutschen Post. Nähere Einzelheiten beantwortet
das Kundentelefon der Deutschen Post: 0 18 02 / 33 33. Die Vielfalt der
Briefmarken wird sich in Euroland nicht ändern. Die deutschen Briefmarken
werden weiterhin die Herkunftsangabe Deutschland tragen.

 26. Ist der Euro trotz des starken Dollars eine stabile Währung?
  Auch der Wechselkurs zwischen D-Mark und US-Dollar unterlag in früheren
Jahren immer wieder starken Schwankungen. Weil die Inflationsraten niedrig
waren und damit die Kaufkraft in Deutschland erhalten blieb, war die D-Mark
dennoch eine stabile Währung. Auch die Inflationsrate im Euroland liegt auf
einem historisch niedrigen Niveau. Das bedeutet: Der Wert des Geldes bleibt
erhalten. Diese innere Stabilität zählt für den Verbraucher und den Sparer.

 From: http://www.aktion-euro.de/html/


John

Keiner ist hoffnungsloser versklavt als derjenige, der irrtümlich glaubt
frei zu sein.

There are none more hopelessly enslaved then those who falsely believe they
are free!

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)







[USMA:14118] RE: Rules of thumb 3

2001-06-30 Thread James R. Frysinger

In the US a bushel is 4 pecks and a peck is 8 dry quarts. Also, a US
bushel is 2150.42 in3 (~35.239 07 L) in contrast to the Imperial bushel
of 2219.36 in3. In the US the dry quart (~1.101 L) is larger than the
liquid quart (~0.946 L), whereas the Imperial quart (1.136 L) is the
same for both dry and liquid. So, neither of our quarts is an imperial
measure.

Having said all that, many commodities have specific bushels that are
actually defined in terms of weight (mass, actually). A bushel of oats
is neither the same volume nor the same mass as a bushel of soybeans. I
don't know if this is true of apples or not, but that information might
be available via USDA's web site or in one of the NCWM handbooks on my
shelf if you desparately need it.

Why don't I believe Smithsonian, et al., when they say Americans
understand this better than SI?

Jim

Stephen C. Gallagher wrote:
 
   Cider: ­ Thirty litres of apples will make about ten litres of cider.
 
  I've never seen apples priced by volume. Shouldn't that be 30 kg?
 
 Aren't bushels volume measurements?
 They're ifp, of course, but I have seen apples sold
 using that unit.  Don't ask me how big it is.
 
 Stephen Gallagher

-- 
Metric Methods(SM)   Don't be late to metricate!
James R. Frysinger, CAMS http://www.metricmethods.com/
10 Captiva Row   e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charleston, SC 29407 phone/FAX:  843.225.6789




[USMA:14119] Re: Euro logistics

2001-06-30 Thread James R. Frysinger

Unfortunately, Louis, the euro symbol did not display properly in 
either Netscape nor in Kmail on my linux system. I see your message was 
sent in ISO 8859-1 but both programs show me a strange symbol (circle 
with four radiating lines at 045, 135, 225, and 315 degrees). The 
message source says that the character that was sent was =A4. I 
notice that $ is a shift-4 on my US keyboard and wonder if that's what 
A4 indicates?

Jim

On Friday 29 June 2001 1707, Louis JOURDAN wrote:
 At 16:09 -0400 01/06/29, Nat Hager III wrote:
 Interesting article on the logistics of Euro-conversion, from next
  week's Business Week International.  Makes US metric conversion
  look like a walk in the park.

 Yeah... At least Euro-conversion is thoroughly prepared, whilst the
 US metric conversion...

 Seriously, don't give too much credit to this article. Euro is
 already a reality for many people, and conversion will go smoothly.
 If some journalists want to make it a nightmare, that is their
 problem.

 Interesting : do you know how I get the euro symbol ¤ with my new
 MacOS (9.1) ? by typing option-$. In other words the euro is just
 an alternative to the dollar ?

 Louis

-- 
James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644




[USMA:14121] SI Names and Symbols (fwd)

2001-06-30 Thread Gene Mechtly

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 23:37:41 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gene Mechtly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ian Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Martin, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED], Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Taylor, Barry N. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SI Names and Symbols

On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ian Mills wrote:

 ... The proposal for the alternative symbols D, H and K to be allowed in
 parallel with the existing symbols da, h and k was discussed, and the
 decision was taken to make no change in the current rules for prefixes.
 ...
But the EU Directive already prescribes *only* H and K (retaining da).
How is that divergence to be resolved?

 ... The reason for making no change was that the CCU is strongly of the
 opinion that making many small changes to the SI will lead to confusion,
 and hence that it is better to make no changes unless we feel the case
 to be overwhelming.

Was the need compelling for the alternative L for l ?No!
Spelling the quantity name in full or ml are unambiguous in all cases.

 It is not for me to detail who spoke which way on issues of this kind.
 The members of the CCU are there as representatives of their supporting
 institutions, ... they are not present in a personal capacity.

Are CCU members (persons) publicly accountable (on record) for advocating
or opposing specific proposals?

Are institutional positions on each proposal matters of public record?

 In my last message I also mentioned the problem of the two alternative
 names SI units and units of the SI, ... we felt ourselves forced to
 make a change for two reasons...

 Second, ... almost all folk ... find it extraordinary to be told ...
 that the kilometre, the centimetre, and the millimetre are not SI units.
 It seems to violate common understanding.

SI is not yet commonly understood or even taught.  However, it is very
easy to teach any intelligent and attentive person that there is only
one SI unit for each physical quantity (and that decimal multiples and
submultiples are formed by application of SI prefixes), in accord with
the statement in the BIPM Brochure It is important to emphasize that
each physical quantity has only one SI unit, ... (Page 92, 1998)

 We therefore decided to make the change ... SI units and units of the
 SI may both be taken to refer to all the units with or without prefixes.

My hope remains that the CIPM, the CGPM, and the BIPM will reject this
distortion of the concept of coherent SI units.

Eugene A. (Gene) Mechtly




[USMA:14120] Re: Symbols for SI Prefixes (fwd)

2001-06-30 Thread Gene Mechtly

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:56:14 +0200
From: Terry Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ian Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gene Mechtly [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Martin, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Taylor, Barry N. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Symbols for SI Prefixes

Dear Ian
 Symbols for SI prefixes.

 I have recently been informed by the European Commission that the
apparent acceptance in a European Directive of the symbols D, H,  and K  is
now recognized as having been a simple mistake and that steps are being
taken to  rectify it.

 With best regards


 Terry


At 12:27 28/06/2001 +0100, Ian Mills wrote:
Dear Gene,

I am sorry to have been so slow in replying to your last email.  For various
reasons it did not get an immediate reply, and then it got lost in the
press of
other matters that I have had to deal with.

However I have little to add, in reply to your questions, to the
information that I
reported in my last message to you.  The proposal for the alternative
symbols D, H
and K to be allowed in parallel with the existing symbols da, h and k was
discussed, and the decision was taken to make no change in the current
rules for
prefixes.  We did not actually vote because the decision was essentially
unanimous.  The reason for making no change was that the CCU is strongly
of the
opinion that making many small changes to the SI will lead to confusion,
and hence
that it is better to make no changes unless we feel the case to be
overwhelming.
In this case the meeting did not feel that the case was so strong.  The CCU
receives many proposals for small changes to the SI, and generally these
are not
accepted, even though many of them have some logical support.

It is not for me to detail who spoke which way on issues of this
kind.  The members
of the CCU are there as representatives of their supporting institutions,
such as
the NIST, the NPL, the IUPAP, and the IUPAC; they are not present in a
personal
capacity.  Thus you should lobby your representative from one of these
bodies if
you wish to express a view.

In my last message I also mentioned the problem of the two alternative
names SI
units and units of the SI, which have been given different meanings in the
ruling of the CCU in recent years.  In this case we again considered the
alternative of making no change, for the reasons mentioned above, but we felt
ourselves forced to make a change for two reasons.
First, it is a violation of the English language to attach different
meanings to
the phrases SI units and units of the SI.   That was put to us by several
people, and it seemed a compelling reason for making a change.
Second, it was also put to us that most ordinary folk, indeed almost all folk
whether or not they are trained scientists, find it extraordinary to be
told (for
example) that the kilometre, the centimetre, and the millimetre are not SI
units.
It seems to violate common understanding.
We therefore decided to make the change that I believe I described briefly
in my
last message, namely that one should use the phrase coherent SI units to
refer to
only the SI base units and the coherent derived units (i.e. those without
prefixes,
excluding the exceptional case of the kilogram).  Then the phrases SI
units and
units of the SI may both be taken to refer to all the units with or without
prefixes.

I am sorry to disappoint you.

With my best wishes,   Ian Mills
-
from: Ian Mills,  President of the CCU
  Department of Chemistry
  University of Reading
  Reading  RG6 6AD   U.K.
phone: +44 (0)118  931 8456
fax: +44 (0)118  931 1610
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.chem.rdg.ac.uk//dept/staff/phys/imm.html





[USMA:14122] Re: Euro logistics

2001-06-30 Thread James R. Frysinger

I should have included here that the fonts used by my Netscape and Kmail
preferences at the moment are (Adobe) Times and (Adobe) Courier for
proportional and fixed font spacings, respectively. Perhaps a change or
upgrade to my fonts would solve the problem.

Jim

James R. Frysinger wrote:
 
 Unfortunately, Louis, the euro symbol did not display properly in
 either Netscape nor in Kmail on my linux system. I see your message was
 sent in ISO 8859-1 but both programs show me a strange symbol (circle
 with four radiating lines at 045, 135, 225, and 315 degrees). The
 message source says that the character that was sent was =A4. I
 notice that $ is a shift-4 on my US keyboard and wonder if that's what
 A4 indicates?
 
 Jim
 
 On Friday 29 June 2001 1707, Louis JOURDAN wrote:
  At 16:09 -0400 01/06/29, Nat Hager III wrote:
  Interesting article on the logistics of Euro-conversion, from next
   week's Business Week International.  Makes US metric conversion
   look like a walk in the park.
 
  Yeah... At least Euro-conversion is thoroughly prepared, whilst the
  US metric conversion...
 
  Seriously, don't give too much credit to this article. Euro is
  already a reality for many people, and conversion will go smoothly.
  If some journalists want to make it a nightmare, that is their
  problem.
 
  Interesting : do you know how I get the euro symbol ¤ with my new
  MacOS (9.1) ? by typing option-$. In other words the euro is just
  an alternative to the dollar ?
 
  Louis
 
 --
 James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
 10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
 Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
 843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
 http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644

-- 
Metric Methods(SM)   Don't be late to metricate!
James R. Frysinger, CAMS http://www.metricmethods.com/
10 Captiva Row   e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charleston, SC 29407 phone/FAX:  843.225.6789




[USMA:14123] Decimal point or decimal comma?

2001-06-30 Thread Joseph B. Reid

In my message USMA 14106 I forgot to mention that Simon Stevin also
recommended the use of decimal divisions of the degree of angle instead of
minutes and seconds.  This still has not been universally adopted but ISO
has recommended it.

Joseph B. Reid
17 Glebe Road West
TorontoM5P 1C8   Tel. 416 486-6071




[USMA:14124] Inching forward to defeat

2001-06-30 Thread James R. Frysinger

Editor
Washington Post
Washington, DC

Dear Editor:

The reporter, Jeannine Aversa, whose article Economy Grows at 1.2 
Percent Rate appeared last evening on the AP wire, may have written 
something more significant than she realizes. The lead paragraph reads:
   The U.S. economy barely inched forward in the first
   three months of the year and President Bush's chief
   economist said that growth in the current quarter
   was likely even worse.
Yes, we are only inching forward.

In the U.S. - now the only non-metric country in the world - industry 
is shriveling so fast that our export profile is shifting from goods to 
information and services and our share of world trade has declined for 
several years.

Our government's foolish foot-dragging in metricating the U.S. cannot 
be helping our trade situation. With the vast majority of consumers in 
the world thinking in terms of metric units, why do we work 
inefficiently in inches and market offensively in ounces? That seems 
rather pound-foolish to me.

Who's side is our government on? The side of the people or the side of 
internationally owned big businesses who will survive when domestically 
owned smaller businesses go six feet under?

James R. Frysinger

copy to: feedback, Associated Press wire
(please pass to Jeannine Aversa)

-- 
James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644




[USMA:14125] VIRUS probably still on Stanley Doores computer!

2001-06-30 Thread han.maenen


The message USMA 13778 from Stanley Doore: Weatheroffice site HAS ifp option is 
probably still contaminated weith a virus attachment!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

There IS and Imperial option on this site. See my message 13766 and 13769:

snip

Take a look to the attachment 

Attachment: 2 images.pif  application/octet-streamm 17.79 KB

Han







[USMA:14126] Re: Euro logistics

2001-06-30 Thread Paul Trusten

Same on my PC.

James R. Frysinger wrote:
 
 Unfortunately, Louis, the euro symbol did not display properly in
 either Netscape nor in Kmail on my linux system. I see your message was
 sent in ISO 8859-1 but both programs show me a strange symbol (circle
 with four radiating lines at 045, 135, 225, and 315 degrees). The
 message source says that the character that was sent was =A4. I
 notice that $ is a shift-4 on my US keyboard and wonder if that's what
 A4 indicates?
 
 Jim
 
 On Friday 29 June 2001 1707, Louis JOURDAN wrote:
  At 16:09 -0400 01/06/29, Nat Hager III wrote:
  Interesting article on the logistics of Euro-conversion, from next
   week's Business Week International.  Makes US metric conversion
   look like a walk in the park.
 
  Yeah... At least Euro-conversion is thoroughly prepared, whilst the
  US metric conversion...
 
  Seriously, don't give too much credit to this article. Euro is
  already a reality for many people, and conversion will go smoothly.
  If some journalists want to make it a nightmare, that is their
  problem.
 
  Interesting : do you know how I get the euro symbol ¤ with my new
  MacOS (9.1) ? by typing option-$. In other words the euro is just
  an alternative to the dollar ?
 
  Louis
 
 --
 James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
 10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
 Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
 843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
 http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644

-- 
Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apt. 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
(915)-694-6208
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[USMA:14127] Re: Euro logistics

2001-06-30 Thread kilopascal

2001-06-30

Gleichfalls

John

Keiner ist hoffnungsloser versklavt als derjenige, der irrtümlich glaubt
frei zu sein.

There are none more hopelessly enslaved then those who falsely believe they
are free!

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)



- Original Message -
From: Paul Trusten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: U.S. Metric Association [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: U.S. Metric Association [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 2001-06-30 13:34
Subject: [USMA:14126] Re: Euro logistics


 Same on my PC.

 James R. Frysinger wrote:
 
  Unfortunately, Louis, the euro symbol did not display properly in
  either Netscape nor in Kmail on my linux system. I see your message was
  sent in ISO 8859-1 but both programs show me a strange symbol (circle
  with four radiating lines at 045, 135, 225, and 315 degrees). The
  message source says that the character that was sent was =A4. I
  notice that $ is a shift-4 on my US keyboard and wonder if that's what
  A4 indicates?
 
  Jim
 
  On Friday 29 June 2001 1707, Louis JOURDAN wrote:
   At 16:09 -0400 01/06/29, Nat Hager III wrote:
   Interesting article on the logistics of Euro-conversion, from next
week's Business Week International.  Makes US metric conversion
look like a walk in the park.
  
   Yeah... At least Euro-conversion is thoroughly prepared, whilst the
   US metric conversion...
  
   Seriously, don't give too much credit to this article. Euro is
   already a reality for many people, and conversion will go smoothly.
   If some journalists want to make it a nightmare, that is their
   problem.
  
   Interesting : do you know how I get the euro symbol ¤ with my new
   MacOS (9.1) ? by typing option-$. In other words the euro is just
   an alternative to the dollar ?
  
   Louis
 
  --
  James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
  10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
  Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
  843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
  http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644

 --
 Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
 3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apt. 122
 Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
 (915)-694-6208
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





[USMA:14128] RE: Rules of thumb 3

2001-06-30 Thread Bill Potts

Stephen:

I'll stand by my statement that I've never SEEN apples priced by volume.
Your note reminds me, though, that I have HEARD of it. g

Bill Potts, CMS
Roseville, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Stephen C. Gallagher
 Sent: June 30, 2001 04:30
 To: U.S. Metric Association
 Subject: [USMA:14117] RE: Rules of thumb 3



   Cider: ­ Thirty litres of apples will make about ten litres of cider.
 
  I've never seen apples priced by volume. Shouldn't that be 30 kg?

 Aren't bushels volume measurements?
 They're ifp, of course, but I have seen apples sold
 using that unit.  Don't ask me how big it is.

 Stephen Gallagher





[USMA:14131] Re: Euro logistics

2001-06-30 Thread Louis JOURDAN

At 10:15 -0400 01/06/30, James R. Frysinger wrote:
I should have included here that the fonts used by my Netscape and Kmail
preferences at the moment are (Adobe) Times and (Adobe) Courier for
proportional and fixed font spacings, respectively. Perhaps a change or
upgrade to my fonts would solve the problem.

Not sure : my combination of keys alt-$ to get the euro symbol works 
with most of my fonts, including Times and Courier - but not with 
AvantGarde, Bodoni, Bookman, Hobo, Lucida, Mishiwaka, ...

Who can explain ?

Louis




[USMA:14132] Re: Euro logistics

2001-06-30 Thread Bill Potts

Louis Jourdan wrote:
 Not sure : my combination of keys alt-$ to get the euro symbol works
 with most of my fonts, including Times and Courier - but not with
 AvantGarde, Bodoni, Bookman, Hobo, Lucida, Mishiwaka, ...

My computers are configured for the U.S. International keyboard. With that,
the keystroke for the euro symbol (?) is Ctr-Alt-5.

Alt-$ would, of course, apply only to a French keyboard (yours, for
example), as it's the only one for which the numerals require the shift key
and the special characters are unshifted. On other keyboards, it would be
Alt-Shift-4, which, on my keyboard, yields the generic currency symbol ($ -
spiky circle).

Bill Potts, CMS
Roseville, CA
http://metric1.org  [SI Navigator]




[USMA:14135] Re: Euro logistics

2001-06-30 Thread chris

On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 20:32:33 +0200, Louis JOURDAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

At 10:15 -0400 01/06/30, James R. Frysinger wrote:
I should have included here that the fonts used by my Netscape and Kmail
preferences at the moment are (Adobe) Times and (Adobe) Courier for
proportional and fixed font spacings, respectively. Perhaps a change or
upgrade to my fonts would solve the problem.

Not sure : my combination of keys alt-$ to get the euro symbol works 
with most of my fonts, including Times and Courier - but not with 
AvantGarde, Bodoni, Bookman, Hobo, Lucida, Mishiwaka, ...

Who can explain ?

I use Alt Gr+4 to get the euro symbol. Works (on a UK keyboard) in all
apps I've tried it in (except using the Fixed Font here in Agent -
selecting Arial works OK).

Switching to French keyboard: Alt Gr+E gives the euro symbol.

Chris
-- 
UK Metrication Association: http://www.metric.org.uk/




[USMA:14136] Re: (no subject)

2001-06-30 Thread James R. Frysinger

I've more than heard of bushel baskets; I've toted many of them. Yes,
apples and many other items were commonly sold by the bushel, the
half-bushel (there were baskets for those, too), and the peck (ditto).

The baskets were made of very thin slices of wood that radiated out from
the center of the bottom and then were molded upward to form the sides.
Other slats were banded around the top and middle to hold them together.
Fasteners were generally staples. Two wire handles were attached for
carrying. I suppose that they don't make those anymore and that people
now use cardboard boxes. Bushel baskets also saw uses as laundry
baskets, storage baskets, and basketball hoops (with the bottoms knocked
out).

Crates were sturdier and were a great source of wood for kids for
building all sorts of projects.

Either type of container served admirally in providing splinters for
nearly everyone's fingers.

Jim

Joseph B. Reid wrote:

 I have heard of a bushel basket.  I suspect that a bushel of apples is a
 bushel basket of apples, more or less full.

-- 
Metric Methods(SM)   Don't be late to metricate!
James R. Frysinger, CAMS http://www.metricmethods.com/
10 Captiva Row   e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charleston, SC 29407 phone/FAX:  843.225.6789




[USMA:14137] Fwd: Inching forward to defeat

2001-06-30 Thread James R. Frysinger

Spelling correction: Please correct the spelling from who's to 
whose in the last paragraph, as shown below.

Thank you.

James R. Frysinger

--  Forwarded Message  --
Subject: Inching forward to defeat
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 11:21:38 -0400
From: James R. Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Editor
Washington Post
Washington, DC

Dear Editor:

The reporter, Jeannine Aversa, whose article Economy Grows at 1.2
Percent Rate appeared last evening on the AP wire, may have written
something more significant than she realizes. The lead paragraph reads:
   The U.S. economy barely inched forward in the first
   three months of the year and President Bush's chief
   economist said that growth in the current quarter
   was likely even worse.
Yes, we are only inching forward.

In the U.S. - now the only non-metric country in the world - industry
is shriveling so fast that our export profile is shifting from goods to
information and services and our share of world trade has declined for
several years.

Our government's foolish foot-dragging in metricating the U.S. cannot
be helping our trade situation. With the vast majority of consumers in
the world thinking in terms of metric units, why do we work
inefficiently in inches and market offensively in ounces? That seems
rather pound-foolish to me.

Whose side is our government on? The side of the people or the side of
internationally owned big businesses who will survive when domestically
owned smaller businesses go six feet under?

James R. Frysinger

copy to: feedback, Associated Press wire
(please pass to Jeannine Aversa)

--
James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644

---

-- 
James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644