Re: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL
Dave, If my understanding is correct, the following video is evidence of a closed wormhole through the Earth with two black hole particles orbiting through it, we named the particles Ike and Eduardo. Each particle weighed approx. 1x10e12-1x10e14 kg and traveled at sub relativistic speeds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEvCP7TXIEU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jf-b37stBOU The popping on the video is most likely the electromagnetic pulse an orbiting particle. The trick is jumping aboard without getting nuked from beta decay. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:24 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: It would be fantastic if warp drives were possible, but they must not be available because we are not currently being over run by alien visitors. Dave -Original Message- From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wed, Nov 28, 2012 12:48 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL Here are some relevant physics.SE questions: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/38121/harold-whites-work-on-the-alcubierre-warp-drive http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/8850/alcubierre-drive-clarification-on-relativistic-effects The Alcubierre warp drive then has a serious departure between local laws of physics and global ones, which is not apparent in the universe or de Sitter spacetime. The Alcubierre warp drive is then important as a gadget, along with wormholes as related things, to understand how nature prevents closed timelike curves and related processes. (Six votes.) This quote reminds me of the transport ships in Dune with the navigators that David Lynch renders like whales: Relativistic effects happen when you travel near light speed through space-time. With the Alcubierre drive, you don't travel through space-time, but remain stationary and the space-time around you is warped in a way that brings you closer to your destination. So if it only took a week for you, it would only take a week for your observers. (Two votes.) Eric On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: http://io9.com/5963263/how-nasa-will-build-its-very-first-warp-drive Has anyone competent to understand the arguments read the 1994 paper? Jeff
Re: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL
I suggest as soon as possible everyone get very familiar with sites like http://www.spaceweather.com There are also apps that monitor and alert you of solar flares through your phone. It appears to me that the ground level events (GLEs) from large coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are detecting when massive energetic particles are striking Earth as they are setting off proton and neutron detectors on Earth from their Beta Decay. Many of them then begin their orbit over months. Hurricane Isaac and the Bayou Corne sinkhole were proceeded by a massive GLE which struck North America in May 2012. I suggest everyone setup an auto warning on their phones. It might be the last signal you get before a big X Class EMF strikes Earth and power goes out...Then go get underneath lots of concrete and have a bike close by (maybe in your trunk) if it fries your electronic fuel injection in your car. You might not need lights anyway for a few months since after the 1859 Carrington Super Flare event the night sky was lit up like a Christmas Tree for months from the massive Aurora. Also protect yourselves from ionizing radiation. In 2013, with two Comets on close approach to the sun, she may have a bad spell. I know some of you think I am full of crap, but I could care less and I am being very serious. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:12 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: Dave, If my understanding is correct, the following video is evidence of a closed wormhole through the Earth with two black hole particles orbiting through it, we named the particles Ike and Eduardo. Each particle weighed approx. 1x10e12-1x10e14 kg and traveled at sub relativistic speeds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEvCP7TXIEU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jf-b37stBOU The popping on the video is most likely the electromagnetic pulse an orbiting particle. The trick is jumping aboard without getting nuked from beta decay. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:24 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote: It would be fantastic if warp drives were possible, but they must not be available because we are not currently being over run by alien visitors. Dave -Original Message- From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wed, Nov 28, 2012 12:48 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL Here are some relevant physics.SE questions: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/38121/harold-whites-work-on-the-alcubierre-warp-drive http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/8850/alcubierre-drive-clarification-on-relativistic-effects The Alcubierre warp drive then has a serious departure between local laws of physics and global ones, which is not apparent in the universe or de Sitter spacetime. The Alcubierre warp drive is then important as a gadget, along with wormholes as related things, to understand how nature prevents closed timelike curves and related processes. (Six votes.) This quote reminds me of the transport ships in Dune with the navigators that David Lynch renders like whales: Relativistic effects happen when you travel near light speed through space-time. With the Alcubierre drive, you don't travel through space-time, but remain stationary and the space-time around you is warped in a way that brings you closer to your destination. So if it only took a week for you, it would only take a week for your observers. (Two votes.) Eric On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: http://io9.com/5963263/how-nasa-will-build-its-very-first-warp-drive Has anyone competent to understand the arguments read the 1994 paper? Jeff
Re: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 28 Nov 2012 01:24:31 -0500 (EST): Hi, [snip] It would be fantastic if warp drives were possible, but they must not be available because we are not currently being over run by alien visitors. Dave Given the number of UFO sightings, I would be inclined to say that we are. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL
Thanx for this story, luckily I saw it in my spam folder,(which barely works at all in yahoo mail) before it got deleted. I tried then to make a reply, but this io9.com group has very strict admission standards. It wouldnt accept any user names ect and when I finally got in it said I could only post to the newbies category. Hell I cant even find what I posted there except by doing a search from my user name! the moderator wiped out my you tube entries as suspicious. Then I went back to this article and posted a reply anyways, and lo and behold it went through! For those of you who havent seen my Topological Proof of Time Distortion it is now listed there on the url you submitted as a reply. Thanx for posting this as I like to expose my work across a broad spectrum. If any vortex members wish they can reply about my video at the bottom reply icon listed with that story. Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ --- On Wed, 11/28/12, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com Subject: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, November 28, 2012, 12:22 AM http://io9.com/5963263/how-nasa-will-build-its-very-first-warp-drive Has anyone competent to understand the arguments read the 1994 paper? Jeff
Re: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL
Here are some relevant physics.SE questions: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/38121/harold-whites-work-on-the-alcubierre-warp-drive http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/8850/alcubierre-drive-clarification-on-relativistic-effects The Alcubierre warp drive then has a serious departure between local laws of physics and global ones, which is not apparent in the universe or de Sitter spacetime. The Alcubierre warp drive is then important as a gadget, along with wormholes as related things, to understand how nature prevents closed timelike curves and related processes. (Six votes.) This quote reminds me of the transport ships in Dune with the navigators that David Lynch renders like whales: Relativistic effects happen when you travel near light speed through space-time. With the Alcubierre drive, you don't travel through space-time, but remain stationary and the space-time around you is warped in a way that brings you closer to your destination. So if it only took a week for you, it would only take a week for your observers. (Two votes.) Eric On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: http://io9.com/5963263/how-nasa-will-build-its-very-first-warp-drive Has anyone competent to understand the arguments read the 1994 paper? Jeff
Re: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL
It would be fantastic if warp drives were possible, but they must not be available because we are not currently being over run by alien visitors. Dave -Original Message- From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wed, Nov 28, 2012 12:48 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Apparently plausible (!?!?) FTL Here are some relevant physics.SE questions: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/38121/harold-whites-work-on-the-alcubierre-warp-drive http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/8850/alcubierre-drive-clarification-on-relativistic-effects The Alcubierre warp drive then has a serious departure between local laws of physics and global ones, which is not apparent in the universe or de Sitter spacetime. The Alcubierre warp drive is then important as a gadget, along with wormholes as related things, to understand how nature prevents closed timelike curves and related processes. (Six votes.) This quote reminds me of the transport ships in Dune with the navigators that David Lynch renders like whales: Relativistic effects happen when you travel near light speed through space-time. With the Alcubierre drive, you don't travel through space-time, but remain stationary and the space-time around you is warped in a way that brings you closer to your destination. So if it only took a week for you, it would only take a week for your observers. (Two votes.) Eric On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: http://io9.com/5963263/how-nasa-will-build-its-very-first-warp-drive Has anyone competent to understand the arguments read the 1994 paper? Jeff
