Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-13 Thread Michele Comitini
Il giorno 13/nov/2011 02:23, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com ha
scritto:

 Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:

 A. Final note
 There is a big difference between your efforts on
http://www.lenr-canr.org and the e-cat site.  The first is a service to the
community, the other is for selling goods.


 What is wrong with selling goods?!?

Stop it there!  Why do you jump to the wrong conclusion?? I do manage a
business so I am a pure capitalist I risk every day of my life my own
capital. I bet on my business.  Do you?!

I do things for free too:  it is an indirect way of supporting the business
by letting others try the quality of work and to expand the network.  Read
well what I write.  Free is not the same as gratis.  Free is about
freedom, like in freedom of speech.  About being fair in business ad
give credit to others' ideas when credit is due.  And yes I do sell free
things, customers can do whatever they please with them, with one caveat,
they must respect others freedom when they sell derived works.

Did I say I do not like Rossi jobs and is not his way of doing business as
a whole? indeed I think he is very good at it in many aspects. Not the
website. That website will make him loose potential customers.

Back to the point...

The difference between a free informative website and a business website is
about selling. On a business if you damage potential sales, you are doing a
poor job with the website.  Rossi's site does not look like, and it is not
a business site, it is very amateurish at presentation and at technical
level, it does not speak business language, not that of the  $1M or more
type of potential customer.  I hope someone tells this to Rossi ASAP.

mic



 Do you have some ivory-tower objection to capitalism? You don't like to
see people making a living? Do you think Rossi is obligated to give away
secrets worth a trillion dollars? If you think people should give away
their property, please send all of your money to me, at 1954 Airport Road.

 I cannot understand why people criticize Rossi for keeping this secret
when it is the U.S. Patent Office that refuses to grant patents for cold
fusion

  I cannot understand this attitude that Rossi should do whatever you say,
or Mary Yugo says, even though what you want him to do would ruin his
business. I wish he would do as I say only because I think it would be
bring him more money, and it would bring cold fusion to the world more
quickly.

 This is his discovery, his intellectual property, and his business. He
can run his business any way he wants to. He has no obligation to tell us
anything, or to do any public tests. If he wants to use obsolete web page
software, that is his decision. We can criticize these decisions, or
ridicule them, but people here act as if Rossi has a moral obligation to
follow our orders. He does not. No businessman does. Thank goodness for
that. Capitalism would not work if they did. Without capitalism we would
all live in poverty.

 - Jed



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:

 The difference between a free informative website and a business website
 is about selling. On a business if you damage potential sales, you are
 doing a poor job with the website.  Rossi's site does not look like, and it
 is not a business site, it is very amateurish at presentation and at
 technical level, it does not speak business language, not that of the  $1M
 or more type of potential customer.

I agree.

I got the mistaken impression from the previous message that you find
something wrong with Rossi's goal of making money. Many people do.


 I hope someone tells this to Rossi ASAP.

Many people have told him. He does not care what people think. As I said,
that is both a strength and a weakness.

The one thing Rossi does accept is technical advice from experts. Not about
his experimental technique, unfortunately, but some experts have told me he
does listen when it comes to engineering.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-13 Thread Alan Fletcher
http://www.leonardo-ecat.com/fp/Products/1MW_Plant/index.html NOTICE: November 
13, 2011; 9:00 am MST Andrea Rossi has removed his official designation from 
this site until he has time to make certain corrections. Only those pages with 
the designation: Approved by Andrea Rossi should be considered official. [ 
I haven't found any so far ... ] Has a specification able for the 1 MW. Thermal 
Output Power1 MWElectrical Input Power Peak 200 kW  Electrical 
input Power Average  167 kW  COP 6   Power Ranges20 kW-1 MW  
Modules 52  Power per Module20kWWater Pump brand
Water Pump Pressure 4 Bar   Water Pump Capacity 1500 kg/hr  
Water Pump Ranges   30-1500 kg/hr   Water Input Temperature 4-85 C  
Water Output Temperature85-120 CControl Box Brand   Natl. 
Instr.Controlling SoftwareLeonardoOperation and Maintenance 
Cost  $0.5/MWhr   Fuel Cost   $0.1/MWhr   Recharge Cost   
$10/module  Recharge Frequency  2/year  Warranty2 years 
Estimated Lifespan  20 yearsPrice   2M EurosDimension   
2.4 x 2.6 x 6m ( I'm using my laptop via the zimra web browser ... I don't know 
if that table's going to come out OK )

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-13 Thread Alan Fletcher
Technical specifications Thermal Output Power  1 MW Electrical Input Power Peak 
200 kW Electrical input Power Average 167 kW COP 6 Power Ranges 20 kW-1 MW 
Modules 52 Power per Module 20kW Water Pump brand Water Pump Pressure4 Bar 
Water Pump Capacity 1500 kg/hr Water Pump Ranges 30-1500 kg/hr Water Input 
Temperature 4-85 C Water Output Temperature 85-120 C Control Box Brand Natl. 
Instr. Controlling Software Leonardo Operation and Maintenance Cost $0.5/MWhr 
Fuel Cost  $0.1/MWhr Recharge Cost $10/module Recharge Frequency 2/year 
Warranty 2 years Estimated Lifespan 20 years Price 2M Euros Dimension 2.4 x 2.6 
x 6m  ( I'm using my laptop via the zimra web browser ... I don't know if
 that table's going to come out OK )


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
On 12 Nov 2011, at 01:39, Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:

 Nothing wrong with old programmers and old engineers. Cut by first code on a 
 8008 system that I designed and built. Had a whole 256 bytes of ram. Put the 
 program in with switches. Now that is old code.
 

Do you still have it? I'm sure that although I've still got the physical 
artefacts of old programmes I wrote when I was a kid, the patterns are long 
gone.

Joe
-- 
Dr Joe Karthauser


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Craig Haynie
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:12 -0800, Mary Yugo wrote:

 
 Someone at Ecatnews.com pointed out that the web site is so bad that
 someone left in this name:
 
 Prof. George Kelly (University of New Hampshire – USA)
 
 That is a throw back to Rossi's board of directors for his silly
 blog he pretends is a peer reviewed journal.  Except that the guy
 apparently doesn't exist.  At least that's what I've read on the
 ultrareliable internet.  Anyone know Professor Kelly personally at U
 of NH?   

Different spelling perhaps?

A George E. Kelley, (class of 1957), is listed here as having died:

http://unhmagazine.unh.edu/w09/obituaries.html

A George F. Kelley is listed here in the class of 1943:

http://www.foundation.unh.edu/honor-roll-donors
https://www.alumni.unh.edu/keep/reunion/reunion_reg.html
http://extension.unh.edu/CommDev/Docs/THEGILMANTONCIVICPROFILE.pdf
http://www.foundation.unh.edu/granite-cornerstone-society

Craig
Manchester, NH





Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Rich Murray
http://www.blongerbros.com/gang/rag.asp

Vivid details on extremely cunning, well organized, intricate street scam
to catch wealthy tourists one by one within a web of fake stock market
speculation in the 1920's... an education for me...


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Rich Murray
 Hello! Welcome to AptyeryxOz

*Ever wondered what life would be like if electricity cost next to nothing
to generate and the resulting products from the actual generation (The
ashes) was essentially household copper.*

*What if the component materials used to create the heat required to
generate the electricity were in the top ten most common elements in the
Universe.*

Well, that's where we will be if recent work done in Low Energy Nuclear
Reaction (LENR) pans out as expected. The work I'm writing about is that of
*Mr. Andrea Rossi*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Rossi_(entrepreneur)
 and *Prof. Sergio Focardi* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergio_Focardi both
of Bologna, in Italy.

 Read more http://www.apteryxoz.com/AboutUs.aspx


http://www.apteryxoz.com/


On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:

http://www.blongerbros.com/gang/rag.asp

 Vivid details on extremely cunning, well organized, intricate street scam
 to catch wealthy tourists one by one within a web of fake stock market
 speculation in the 1920's... an education for me...





Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Like everything I build it was a work in progress and was continually 
evolving. The switch panel went when I got an old teletype. Was so 
excited that I had a printer and real keyboard. The system code was then 
about 1 k. The last work I did on that system involved designing in a 
video terminal as my human interface with the main system of 64k of 
dynamic ram using 1 x 16k chips and a Z80 processor. Thought the string 
transfer op on the Z80 was fantastic. Even had a programmable character 
generator so I could do graphics. I wrote my own version of CPM and 
actually sold a few systems to friends. Back then 64k of ram, a 4 MHz 
Z80 and a 5 MB hard drive was all that was needed to run everything a 
small business needed, word processing (WordStar), spreadsheet (VisiCalc 
I think) and a data base program for accounting. Then Bill Gates came 
along and changed everything.


AG


On 11/13/2011 5:40 AM, Dr Joe Karthauser wrote:

On 12 Nov 2011, at 01:39, Aussie Guy E-Cataussieguy.e...@gmail.com  wrote:


Nothing wrong with old programmers and old engineers. Cut by first code on a 
8008 system that I designed and built. Had a whole 256 bytes of ram. Put the 
program in with switches. Now that is old code.


Do you still have it? I'm sure that although I've still got the physical 
artefacts of old programmes I wrote when I was a kid, the patterns are long 
gone.

Joe




Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Peter Heckert

Am 12.11.2011 08:12, schrieb Mary Yugo:

Yikes!

Defamation would be:  Rossi is a scammer

Whats if we say Rossi is a master scammer ;-)
A personal opinion and perfectly legal:  Rossi may be a scammer (also 
he may not be one).  Freedom of speech on that one, I think.


Really -- I had this issue come up before and I checked with an 
attorney who specializes in it.  There's no defamation in suggestion a 
possibility.  And the first sentence is only defamation if Rossi is 
not a scammer and can prove it in court.  I'm not sure he could! 


Im sure he can. Consider the case of Mike Brady.
They couldnt prove at court that the motors dont work. He had several 
witnesses, but no working examples.
He refused to tell the names of customers and said these will be 
murdered, he must protect them.
There where a scientist who presented theories how these motors might 
work and an engineer and inventor who said they have seen them working.
The engineer (Adolf Schneider) has bought a motor himself and this did 
not work, but Schneider said he understands well why it doesnt work, and 
he is sure Brady will soon be able to solve the problem.
Schneider is tightly connected with the free energy scene. Rossi visited 
Adolf Schneider in switzerland, probably it was Sterling Allan who made 
the contact. There is a photo at PESWiki.

Im sure Rossi could learn a lot during this visit.

He was not convicted because the motors did not work. He was convicted 
because he could not show a factory, because he had no stock parts. So 
he was unable to deliver but he has sold motors, took the money.

He pretended this is in a secret location in south africa.
He pretended he cannot build and demonstrate the motor because some 
unobtainable shielding material was not available.


This is why Brady finally was convicted at court in munich.

Rossi will deliver.
And should the e-cat fail to work, then this are technical problems. 
There are so many scientist that can witness the demonstrations.
He can always say it worked for sure, but sorry there is some secret 
and proprietary inobtanium needed for the catalyst and due to sabotage 
this vanished and I cannot get it now.


He'd have to show to the court's satisfaction that the E-cat was real 
and worked as advertised!  Would he do that?  He sure hasn't so far.
As said, Rossi has enough witnesses. He does not need to prove it works 
at court, at least not in germany.


If he has good advocates and good contracts then he can keep his 
customers silent


Peter



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Terry Blanton
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:

 This is why Brady finally was convicted at court in munich.

The Perendev motor operates in repulsion mode.  Magnets in repulsion
degrade over time; so, assuming it did work as the videos imply, it
would not last.

T



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Michele Comitini
Jed,

Il giorno 12/nov/2011 02:26, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com ha
scritto:

 Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:

 Digging in to the html code, the headers tell it all about quality...
 made with FrontPage software that was discontinued in 2003!


 I do not see why that matters.

 For LENR-CANR.org I use Borland Delphi 4, discontinued in 1999. I
 sometimes tweak the HTML *by hand*. With Programmers Text Editor. For
 shame!

 You got a problem with retro-looking HTML? You got a problem with old
 programs, and old programmers?

 I was going to complain that these screens look too modern. Too busy. I
 like Google's main page.



Here you are making wrong guesses on my ideas about:

1. Software development tools.

2. Quality on the Web.


The following is a reply to the above erroneous assumptions on your side.


1. Software development tools

I have nothing against old programmers (I am one of those by now) or old
(good) programs.  As a matter of fact if i often have to select programmers
for projects I am directly involved in. I always ask what kind of tools
they use.  One key point is that they understand the difference between an
IDE and a text editor, between handmade code and automated code generation.

I am deeply skeptic about automatic code generation with the aid of a
graphical tools, myself being a die hard command line guy.  I  often say
that using a GUI vs CLI is like cavemen paintings vs the greatest invention
of mankind ever: writing. Of course it is an exaggeration, but if you look
at the question in term of  expressiveness, exactness and reproducibility
nothing can beat writing.   The death of things like UML (Unified Modeling
Language) tell a lot about that.

Dealing with real problems using many programming languages creates
oftentimes repeated patterns.  You have three practical approaches that do
not require repeating the typing :

1. Use a GUI that generates the boiler plate code for you.
2. Have a tool to automatically generate the code.
3. Choose a language that comes with the pattern solved.

Me being a lazy kind of person that likes typing short, expressive and
clean code, I naturally prefer option 3.  But the others can do equally
good with patterns.
A pattern in programming resembles the notion of a concept.
Think to the concept of  aeroplane/airplane we can do with analogy to the
above:
1. A drawing or a picture:
http://carseatblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/airplane.jpg
2. Have a *code* *preprocessor* writing A powered fixed-wing aircraft that
is propelled forward by thrust http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust from a jet
engine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_engine or propeller
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propeller_%28aircraft%29...** where needed.
3. Write the instruction airplane.

Suppose that those tool developed by businesses  that all ended just before
the advent of the 20th century and now is 1910.  Since at the time they
where written there was some confusion about airplanes , the definitions
are slightly outdated (wrong for 1910( and you generate code without
knowing it.  Well in your code the airplane will always *crash*!  This is
what happens with FrontPage.  Just to be clear Frontpage falls under type 1

Your situation is *completely* different.  You do not use any automated
code generation.   You have to write by *hand* A powered fixed-wing
aircraft that is propelled forward by
thrusthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrustfrom a jet
engine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_engine or
propellerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propeller_%28aircraft%29...
**  every where you need to express an airplane.  That is what you do with
delphi and it is perfectly fair.  If you keep yourself updated your code at
the time of writing is *correct*.  You are not automating anything and *you
could use any other text editor* to get the same result.

Just to give you an idea of how much I am against old stuff look at what
I  use to do my daily work:
- Unix or Linux
- Emacs
- LaTex

Take a look around to find how young are those toys (the youngest is Linux:
20 years old, but not is good old cousin Unix).  But there is a main
difference with FrontPage: *they are and they will** constantly updated
and improved*.  I am not going to explain why and how because this is
getting too long already, I just state that it is all related to the fact
that it is *free software* i.e. driven by the user (person or business)
need and not by sale needs.

Dead proprietary development software is good if you are the only one that
is going to use the resulting program.  On the contrary on the Internet it
is good policy to adhere to standards, because anyone could come to visit
you. Think of someone speaking Shakespeare English on a international
business confcall, they other mute him off.  Also keep an eye on possible
malicious attacks must be kept.  That is why keeping the code up to date is
important.

2. Quality on the Web

*De gustibus non disputandum*

I would like you to explain how 

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:

A. Final note
 There is a big difference between your efforts on http://www.lenr-canr.organd 
 the e-cat site.  The first is a service to the community, the other is
 for selling goods.


What is wrong with selling goods?!?

Do you have some ivory-tower objection to capitalism? You don't like to see
people making a living? Do you think Rossi is obligated to give away
secrets worth a trillion dollars? If you think people should give away
their property, please send all of your money to me, at 1954 Airport Road.

I cannot understand why people criticize Rossi for keeping this secret when
it is the U.S. Patent Office that refuses to grant patents for cold fusion

 I cannot understand this attitude that Rossi should do whatever *you* say,
or Mary Yugo says, even though what you want him to do would ruin his
business. I wish he would do as I say only because I think it would be
bring him more money, and it would bring cold fusion to the world more
quickly.

This is *his* discovery, *his* intellectual property, and *his* business.
He can run his business any way he wants to. He has no obligation to tell
us anything, or to do any public tests. If he wants to use obsolete web
page software, that is his decision. We can criticize these decisions, or
ridicule them, but people here act as if Rossi has a moral obligation to
follow our orders. He does not. No businessman does. Thank goodness for
that. Capitalism would not work if they did. Without capitalism we would
all live in poverty.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Mary Yugo
Peter Heckert's post is interesting!  But I still don't think Rossi can
even get a law suit heard in the United States if I were to call him a
scammer which of course I have not done.  I said he *may* be scamming.
That isn't really arguable (and also it doesn't say much).

What is wrong with selling goods?!?


Of course nothing.  But there is a lot wrong with misleading and deceptive
advertising.  Also with saying you sold something when you didn't.


 Do you have some ivory-tower objection to capitalism? You don't like to
 see people making a living? Do you think Rossi is obligated to give away
 secrets worth a trillion dollars? If you think people should give away
 their property, please send all of your money to me, at 1954 Airport Road.
 I cannot understand why people criticize Rossi for keeping this secret when
 it is the U.S. Patent Office that refuses to grant patents for cold fusion

  I cannot understand this attitude that Rossi should do whatever *you* say,
 or Mary Yugo says, even though what you want him to do would ruin his
 business. I wish he would do as I say only because I think it would be
 bring him more money, and it would bring cold fusion to the world more
 quickly


So how does selling a bundle of 50+ sample reactors help him keep a
secret?   How does doing this 10 -12 times in the coming year help?
Doesn't he know that sooner than later, one of the devices he gleefully
sells will be disassembled and reverse engineered if they work (a gigantic
if)?  Actually, the existing messy leaking kludge he showed on October 28
that worked a lame few hours coupled to a huge generator could only be sold
for reverse engineering.  I can't think of any other reason anyone else
would buy one!   And of course nobody would buy one unless Rossi has shown
them a heck of a lot better evidence that it works than I have ever seen or
read about.


 .This is *his* discovery, *his* intellectual property, and *his*business. He 
 can run his business any way he wants to. He has no obligation
 to tell us anything, or to do any public tests. If he wants to use obsolete
 web page software, that is his decision. We can criticize these decisions,
 or ridicule them, but people here act as if Rossi has a moral obligation to
 follow our orders. He does not. No businessman does. Thank goodness for
 that. Capitalism would not work if they did. Without capitalism we would
 all live in poverty.


Agreed.  For all the good it will do in helping to determine whether
Rossi's machine is real or a scam.


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:


 Of course nothing.  But there is a lot wrong with misleading and deceptive
 advertising.


Rossi has not done any advertising as far as I know. Perhaps you are
talking about Steorn.



   Also with saying you sold something when you didn't.


Do you have any reason to think that Rossi has not sold the reactor, as he
claims? Do you have any reason to think the Fioravanti is not an HVAC
engineer, as he claims? Everyone who has talked to him is convinced that he
is.

Please do not make unfounded accusations here.


 I cannot understand this attitude that Rossi should do whatever *you* say,
 or Mary Yugo says, even though what you want him to do would ruin his
 business. I wish he would do as I say only because I think it would be
 bring him more money, and it would bring cold fusion to the world more
 quickly


 So how does selling a bundle of 50+ sample reactors help him keep a
 secret?   How does doing this 10 -12 times in the coming year help?


You seem to have missed my point. Let me repeat myself:

These things are for Rossi to decide. Not us. This is *his* business, and
his alone.

If I were him, not having patent protection, I would not know what to do.
No matter who you sell to it could end badly. If you don't sell at all, it
ends badly. He is between a rock and a hard place.



 Capitalism would not work if they did. Without capitalism we would all
 live in poverty.


 Agreed.  For all the good it will do in helping to determine whether
 Rossi's machine is real or a scam.


First principle physics has already proved it is real. You have not come up
with any reasons to question that proof. You are scrambling to find some
reason to ignore the laws of physics instead. You want us to look at Rossi
business strategy, or his personality, or the order form, or the web site
software or aesthetics . . . ANYTHING to change the subject and not face
facts.

It seems likely to me that the mechanisms of the free market will also
determine the truth about Rossi's machine. If several machines are sold and
customers are clamoring for them, that will prove they are real. But we
don't need the free market. We already know that a 30 L vessel of water
cannot stay at boiling temperatures for 4 hours, and we already know there
cannot be any hidden wires or stage magic tricks.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Mary Yugo
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:


 Of course nothing.  But there is a lot wrong with misleading and
 deceptive advertising.


 Rossi has not done any advertising as far as I know. Perhaps you are
 talking about Steorn.


Well, Rossi's site is advertising and to me, much of it seems misleading
and deceptive, as much by what it omits as by what it says.




   Also with saying you sold something when you didn't.


 Do you have any reason to think that Rossi has not sold the reactor, as he
 claims? Do you have any reason to think the Fioravanti is not an HVAC
 engineer, as he claims? Everyone who has talked to him is convinced that he
 is.

 Please do not make unfounded accusations here.


If everyone is to take everyone else at their word for what they say they
sold and for what they claim they can do, the world will not be a better
place!   Nobody has reason to think Rossi sold anything other than what
Rossi said. And Rossi constantly lies and misstates things and says bizarre
things as you will be the first to admit and have said.   I don't know
anything about Fioravanti.  I am less concerned that he may not be an HVAC
engineer than about the possibility that he works for Rossi and will say
whatever Rossi wants him to.  That's a concern.  I admit I have no
evidence.  However the method for conducting the tests -- running the big
generator and not letting any of the invited reporters and scientists see
anything of probative value supports my suspicions.   There is no valid
reason I know of for not allowing at least representatives of the press and
scientists see and verify the operating parameters of the megawatt plant
while running.  And if Rossi lies about a lot of things, he could well be
lying about the sale.


 I cannot understand this attitude that Rossi should do whatever *you* say,
 or Mary Yugo says, even though what you want him to do would ruin his
 business. I wish he would do as I say only because I think it would be
 bring him more money, and it would bring cold fusion to the world more
 quickly


 So how does selling a bundle of 50+ sample reactors help him keep a
 secret?   How does doing this 10 -12 times in the coming year help?


 You seem to have missed my point. Let me repeat myself:

 These things are for Rossi to decide. Not us. This is *his* business, and
 his alone.


Well then maybe we should all shut up about what Rossi says, does and has.
I was giving an opinion the same as you and many other people do.  I think
I know how a legitimate scientist and businessman who has what Rossi claims
to have would most likely behave.  He doesn't behave that way in any
manner, shape or form.  That makes me suspicious.  That's the summary of
what I've said.  What part do you object to other than that we have
different opinions about it?


 If I were him, not having patent protection, I would not know what to do.
 No matter who you sell to it could end badly. If you don't sell at all, it
 ends badly. He is between a rock and a hard place.


I don't know a lot about patents but patent specialists have told Rossi
publicly that if he disclosed more about the invention, he could get patent
protection that would be effective.   If he chooses not to do that, his
invention will be copied if it works, regardless of claims of self-destruct
devices and other similar nonsense.   The lesser of the evils is disclosure.




 Capitalism would not work if they did. Without capitalism we would all
 live in poverty.


 Agreed.  For all the good it will do in helping to determine whether
 Rossi's machine is real or a scam.


 First principle physics has already proved it is real. You have not come
 up with any reasons to question that proof. You are scrambling to find some
 reason to ignore the laws of physics instead. You want us to look at Rossi
 business strategy, or his personality, or the order form, or the web site
 software or aesthetics . . . ANYTHING to change the subject and not face
 facts.


We don't differ on laws of physics but on how to interpret the experiments
and results obtained with Rossi's machines.  That Rossi has used first
principle physics to prove it's real is your opinion and you're entitled to
it but that doesn't make it fact and many people disagree.  The peripheral
features you noted that I attend to enhance the possibility of a scam in my
view.  The main reasons I doubt Rossi have already been stated many times
and I won't bore people again by mentioning them.


 It seems likely to me that the mechanisms of the free market will also
 determine the truth about Rossi's machine. If several machines are sold and
 customers are clamoring for them, that will prove they are real. But we
 don't need the free market. We already know that a 30 L vessel of water
 cannot stay at boiling temperatures for 4 hours, and we already know there
 cannot be any hidden wires or stage magic tricks.


I don't agree and I have 

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Akira Shirakawa

On 2011-11-12 00:39, Jouni Valkonen wrote:

For me this looks like a bad joke. It is not nice to do a fan page
that superficially looks like authentic page.


It turns out it's really an official website:

* * *

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Main_Page

Leonardo-ECat.com Official Website Launched - Finally, Andrea Rossi has 
an official website to represent his breakthrough cold fusion E-Cat 
product, to introduce and orient new customers, businessmen, media 
representatives, and other curious parties; answering frequently asked 
questions. Brought to you in association with PES Network. 
(Leonardo-ECat.com; 11.11.11)


* * *

Cheers,
S.A.



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:

 http://www.leonardo-ecat.com


Gee.  I looked all over for an order form, a price list and a PayPal Logo
and darn... no luck.  Oh and:

Page posted by Sterling Allan http://sterlingdallan.com/, PES Network,
Inc. http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:PES_Network,_Inc.

What a surprise.See for example:
http://pesn.com/2011/10/09/9501930_AmericanAntiGravity_Rebooted--Again/

Look at that link to see the list of things this guy supports, promotes and
even raises funding for.  Like I said, with friends like Craig Brown,
Sterling Allan and Hank Mills, Rossi needs no enemies.


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Michele Comitini
Auch!  sorry Akira you already noticed!

2011/11/12 Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com:
 Look down on the pages:

 Page by Hank Mills and Sterling Allan, PES Network, Inc.

 Just like PESN: an old fashioned, '90s looking site...

 mic

 2011/11/12 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
 Major kewl!





Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:

 For me this looks like a bad joke. It is not nice to do a fan page
 that superficially looks like authentic page.


It does look like a bad joke but look at this from there:

 Welcome to the homepage of Andrea Rossi, and his patented cold fusion
technology, the E-Cat (Energy Catalyzer) a revolutionary, game-changing
technology ready to provide for tomorrow's energy needs. 

So maybe Rossi was ill-advised enough to approve it?  I am sure someone
will ask him on his (misnamed) blog soon.  We can probably read about it
tomorrow morning, US time.


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Major kewl!



Yah.  Looks like a camp stove.


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat

I find this very interesting. Where is there a scam here?

http://www.leonardo-ecat.com/fp/Products/1MW_Plant/index.html
*Purchase Terms*

 * Price: 2,000 Euros per kilowatt.
 * 1 MW plant. Only under approved circumstances will smaller sizes be
   considered, but no less than 100 kW.
 * Full payment into escrow account.
 * License contract written up specific to customer.
 * Escrow funds released to Leonardo Corp upon satisfactory completion
   of plant test per customer-Leonardo agreement. Escrow funds return
   to customer if test results are not satisfactory.

For more details and information, please send an email to 
i...@leonardocorp1996.com mailto:i...@leonardocorp1996.com


AG


On 11/12/2011 10:10 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:

Major kewl!




Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
Uhho... this is going to cause a lot of trouble for sure.  Wait until the
universities hear about it!

Now I really do wonder if Rossi ever saw it before it went live.  Ah
well... we'll know soon.

Leonardo Corp Personnel

Ing. Andrea A. 
Rossihttp://www.leonardo-ecat.com/fp/About/Personnel/Andrea_A_Rossi/index.html,
Inventor

Prof. Sergio 
Focardihttp://www.leonardo-ecat.com/fp/About/Personnel/Sergio_Focardi/index.html(INFN
– University of Bologna – Italy)
Prof. Giuseppe Levi (INFN – University of Bologna – Italy)
Prof. Stremmenos Christos (Athen University – Greece)
Richard P. Noceti, Ph. D. , richard.noc...@lt.netl.doe.gov
Prof. Alberto Carnera (INFM – University of Padova – Italy)
Prof. Pierluca Rossi (University of Bologna – Italy)
Prof. Luciana Malferrari (University of Bologna – Italy)
Prof. George Kelly (University of New Hampshire – USA)

Sterling D. Allan http://sterlingdallan.com/, Advisor, webmaster
Hank Mills http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Hank_Mills, Web content


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:

 I find this very interesting. Where is there a scam here?



Oh ok.  Let's order one.  How do I do that exactly?  (medium to small
please, one each)


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Michele Comitini
Digging in to the html code, the headers tell it all about quality...
made with FrontPage software that was discontinued in 2003!

head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1252
meta name=GENERATOR content=Microsoft FrontPage 4.0
meta name=ProgId content=FrontPage.Editor.Document
titleUpcoming Events/title
meta name=Microsoft Border content=tlrb, default

Almost validates as HTML 3.2, just one error, see link below

http://goo.gl/14JP2

mic

2011/11/12 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com:


 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Major kewl!


 Yah.  Looks like a camp stove.




Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat

Site says 100 kw min.

Rossi gets nothing until the unit meets specifications.

AG


On 11/12/2011 10:23 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:



On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat 
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:


I find this very interesting. Where is there a scam here?



Oh ok.  Let's order one.  How do I do that exactly?  (medium to small 
please, one each)




Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:

 Site says 100 kw min.

 Rossi gets nothing until the unit meets specifications.


Right.  Steorn said something like that too.  They never delivered and they
have kept and spent €20 million of investor money along the merry way.
They had lots of parties, I heard.


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat

The money goes into a escrow account. You understand what that means?

AG


On 11/12/2011 10:34 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:



On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat 
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:


Site says 100 kw min.

Rossi gets nothing until the unit meets specifications.


Right.  Steorn said something like that too.  They never delivered and 
they have kept and spent €20 millionof investor money along the merry 
way.  They had lots of parties, I heard.




Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Major kewl!


 Yah.  Looks like a camp stove.

It actually looks like a Coleman camp stove had sex with a Honda generator!

T



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Mary I can 100% assure you that if I was ordering a plant from Rossi and 
my money was in a escrow account, Rossi would not get 1 dollar of that 
money until the plant fully passed the pre agreed performance 
conditions. I would expect every other purchaser would be the same.


I would suggest this openly posted sales conditions really takes the 
wind out of your sails. Under these E-Cat plant sales conditions, there 
can be no fraud or scam. EUR 200k is not that much money to get a taste 
of what the E-Cat can do.


I applaud Rossi for openly declaring the payment conditions. Well done sir.

AG


On 11/12/2011 10:34 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:



On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat 
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:


Site says 100 kw min.

Rossi gets nothing until the unit meets specifications.


Right.  Steorn said something like that too.  They never delivered and 
they have kept and spent €20 millionof investor money along the merry 
way.  They had lots of parties, I heard.




Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Sean True
The design is dated, as is the software used to create it: Microsoft
Frontpage 4.0 (circa 2000).
The domain appears to be hosted on pair.com, which is a step up from
stayhosted ...

I suspect that Mr. Rossi is following the advice of friends, and is
not providing the best possible
venue for his ideas, products, hopes, and dreams. Then again, perhaps
this is part of the grand
plan to deflect attention and discourage people from taking his
business seriously. In any case,
there are now more tea leaves to read.


Domain information:

Registration Service Provided By: Namecheap.com
Contact: supp...@namecheap.com
Visit: http://namecheap.com
Domain name: leonardo-ecat.com

Registrant Contact:
Leonardo Corporation
Andrea Rossi
116 South River Road
Bedford, NH 03110
US

Administrative Contact:
PES Network, Inc
Sterling Allan (sterlin...@pureenergysystems.com)
+1.8014071292
PO Box 429
Mount Pleasant, UT 84647-0429
US

Technical Contact:
PES Network, Inc
Sterling Allan (sterlin...@pureenergysystems.com)
+1.8014071292
PO Box 429
Mount Pleasant, UT 84647-0429
US

Status: Locked

Name Servers:
ns371.pair.com
ns7.ns0.com

Creation date: 11 Nov 2011 17:12:00
Expiration date: 11 Nov 2012 09:12:00



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck does 
the validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that was used to 
create the web site or who the web site was created by or who it is 
administered by?


I suggest the sales and payment conditions has just totally taken the 
wind out of the sails of all the scam / fraud group.


AG


On 11/12/2011 11:09 AM, Sean True wrote:

The design is dated, as is the software used to create it: Microsoft
Frontpage 4.0 (circa 2000).
The domain appears to be hosted on pair.com, which is a step up from
stayhosted ...

I suspect that Mr. Rossi is following the advice of friends, and is
not providing the best possible
venue for his ideas, products, hopes, and dreams. Then again, perhaps
this is part of the grand
plan to deflect attention and discourage people from taking his
business seriously. In any case,
there are now more tea leaves to read.


Domain information:

Registration Service Provided By: Namecheap.com
Contact: supp...@namecheap.com
Visit: http://namecheap.com
Domain name: leonardo-ecat.com

Registrant Contact:
Leonardo Corporation
Andrea Rossi
116 South River Road
Bedford, NH 03110
US

Administrative Contact:
PES Network, Inc
Sterling Allan (sterlin...@pureenergysystems.com)
+1.8014071292
PO Box 429
Mount Pleasant, UT 84647-0429
US

Technical Contact:
PES Network, Inc
Sterling Allan (sterlin...@pureenergysystems.com)
+1.8014071292
PO Box 429
Mount Pleasant, UT 84647-0429
US

Status: Locked

Name Servers:
ns371.pair.com
ns7.ns0.com

Creation date: 11 Nov 2011 17:12:00
Expiration date: 11 Nov 2012 09:12:00






Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:

Digging in to the html code, the headers tell it all about quality...
 made with FrontPage software that was discontinued in 2003!


I do not see why that matters.

For LENR-CANR.org I use Borland Delphi 4, discontinued in 1999. I sometimes
tweak the HTML *by hand*. With Programmers Text Editor. For shame!

You got a problem with retro-looking HTML? You got a problem with old
programs, and old programmers?

I was going to complain that these screens look too modern. Too busy. I
like Google's main page.


Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:


  Yah.  Looks like a camp stove.

 It actually looks like a Coleman camp stove had sex with a Honda generator!


I love it!

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat

Oct / Nov sure has been interesting:

06 Oct - Single E-Cat module demo
28 Oct - 1 MW E-Cat plant demo with first sales announcement
10 Nov - NI announcement
12 Nov - E-Cat web site up with sales / payment conditions that destroys 
those that call scam / fraud


This E-Cat powered train has left the station and is gathering speed. 
Next announcement is?


AG


On 11/12/2011 11:36 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:

Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck does
the validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that was used to
create the web site or who the web site was created by or who it is
administered by?

I suggest the sales and payment conditions has just totally taken the
wind out of the sails of all the scam / fraud group.

AG


On 11/12/2011 11:09 AM, Sean True wrote:

The design is dated, as is the software used to create it: Microsoft
Frontpage 4.0 (circa 2000).
The domain appears to be hosted on pair.com, which is a step up from
stayhosted ...

I suspect that Mr. Rossi is following the advice of friends, and is
not providing the best possible
venue for his ideas, products, hopes, and dreams. Then again, perhaps
this is part of the grand
plan to deflect attention and discourage people from taking his
business seriously. In any case,
there are now more tea leaves to read.


Domain information:

Registration Service Provided By: Namecheap.com
Contact: supp...@namecheap.com
Visit: http://namecheap.com
Domain name: leonardo-ecat.com

Registrant Contact:
Leonardo Corporation
Andrea Rossi
116 South River Road
Bedford, NH 03110
US

Administrative Contact:
PES Network, Inc
Sterling Allan (sterlin...@pureenergysystems.com)
+1.8014071292
PO Box 429
Mount Pleasant, UT 84647-0429
US

Technical Contact:
PES Network, Inc
Sterling Allan (sterlin...@pureenergysystems.com)
+1.8014071292
PO Box 429
Mount Pleasant, UT 84647-0429
US

Status: Locked

Name Servers:
ns371.pair.com
ns7.ns0.com

Creation date: 11 Nov 2011 17:12:00
Expiration date: 11 Nov 2012 09:12:00








Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Nothing wrong with old programmers and old engineers. Cut by first code 
on a 8008 system that I designed and built. Had a whole 256 bytes of 
ram. Put the program in with switches. Now that is old code.


AG


On 11/12/2011 11:56 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com 
mailto:michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:


Digging in to the html code, the headers tell it all about quality...
made with FrontPage software that was discontinued in 2003!


I do not see why that matters.

For LENR-CANR.org I use Borland Delphi 4, discontinued in 1999. I 
sometimes tweak the HTML _by hand_. With Programmers Text Editor. For 
shame!


You got a problem with retro-looking HTML? You got a problem with old 
programs, and old programmers?


I was going to complain that these screens look too modern. Too busy. 
I like Google's main page.



Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yah.  Looks like a camp stove.

It actually looks like a Coleman camp stove had sex with a Honda
generator!


I love it!

- Jed





Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
Kullander will talk about the ecat on 11/23.

2011/11/11 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

 Oct / Nov sure has been interesting:

 06 Oct - Single E-Cat module demo
 28 Oct - 1 MW E-Cat plant demo with first sales announcement
 10 Nov - NI announcement
 12 Nov - E-Cat web site up with sales / payment conditions that destroys
 those that call scam / fraud

 This E-Cat powered train has left the station and is gathering speed. Next
 announcement is?

 AG



 On 11/12/2011 11:36 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:

 Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck does
 the validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that was used to
 create the web site or who the web site was created by or who it is
 administered by?

 I suggest the sales and payment conditions has just totally taken the
 wind out of the sails of all the scam / fraud group.

 AG


 On 11/12/2011 11:09 AM, Sean True wrote:

 The design is dated, as is the software used to create it: Microsoft
 Frontpage 4.0 (circa 2000).
 The domain appears to be hosted on pair.com, which is a step up from
 stayhosted ...

 I suspect that Mr. Rossi is following the advice of friends, and is
 not providing the best possible
 venue for his ideas, products, hopes, and dreams. Then again, perhaps
 this is part of the grand
 plan to deflect attention and discourage people from taking his
 business seriously. In any case,
 there are now more tea leaves to read.


 Domain information:

 Registration Service Provided By: Namecheap.com
 Contact: supp...@namecheap.com
 Visit: http://namecheap.com
 Domain name: leonardo-ecat.com

 Registrant Contact:
 Leonardo Corporation
 Andrea Rossi
 116 South River Road
 Bedford, NH 03110
 US

 Administrative Contact:
 PES Network, Inc
 Sterling Allan 
 (sterlingda@pureenergysystems.**comsterlin...@pureenergysystems.com
 )
 +1.8014071292
 PO Box 429
 Mount Pleasant, UT 84647-0429
 US

 Technical Contact:
 PES Network, Inc
 Sterling Allan 
 (sterlingda@pureenergysystems.**comsterlin...@pureenergysystems.com
 )
 +1.8014071292
 PO Box 429
 Mount Pleasant, UT 84647-0429
 US

 Status: Locked

 Name Servers:
 ns371.pair.com
 ns7.ns0.com

 Creation date: 11 Nov 2011 17:12:00
 Expiration date: 11 Nov 2012 09:12:00







Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Sean True
On 11/12/2011 11:36 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck does
the validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that was used to
create the web site or who the web site was created by or who it is
administered by?

Because it indicates that he is moving at high velocity, with an almost
reckless disregard of the kind of evaluation that most people would
apply to his business. This actually underlines the case against it being
a scam. The site is purely (and barely) functional. No wasted time on
marketing or public relations. Just the facts, Ma'am.



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Steven Johnson
Hey! I still use FP 2003 too!

I don't have time to upgrade. Higher priorities.

Regards
Svj
Orionworks.com

Sent from my iPad
 



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 It actually looks like a Coleman camp stove had sex with a Honda
 generator!

 I love it!


What is really exciting is the anxiety among the s(c)eptics.  It is
far more entertaining than any reality show on the boobtube!

T



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:

 Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck does the
 validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that was used to create
 the web site or who the web site was created by or who it is administered
 by?


I agree, very little.  But it's unlikely that a prosperous and
sophisticated company would do it that way, that's all.


 I suggest the sales and payment conditions has just totally taken the wind
 out of the sails of all the scam / fraud group.


Oh, Gee!  Not at all.  A common form of scam is to take money somewhere
near the start from secret investors who sign an NDA so they can't talk or
write on public forums.  The NDA is usually extremely broad in scope and if
someone hints at breaking it, all sorts of threats of law suits begin.

Meanwhile, the perpetrators buy an ad or two or do a web page or other
introduction, have news releases and press conferences, and announce a new
company that promises all sorts of wonders.  They usually have some sort of
photo op and maybe a carefully contrived demonstration that believers can
sop up but which really proves nothing.   The next step is to announce that
a lot of the proceeds will go to charity.  Blogs sprout up praising the
device and fantasizing what will happen in the future when it is widely
adopted.  Skeptics are scorned and insulted and eventually banned from
enthusiast sites.Then, the scammer says they won't be taking investment
money now.  Maybe in the future they'll go public but they're doing this
on their own.  The secret investors aren't mentioned and they can't say a
peep due to their NDA.  They also don't want to jeopardize success and
future profits.  Some are simply too embarrassed to speak.

Customers are announced but somehow they're never produced.  Test are
declined if they're too definitive.  Hey, they'd reveal too many trade
secrets.  Patents?  Sometimes it's no, sometimes it's yes, it just
couldn't matter less (from Gigi, 1958, IMDB).

Along the way, more secret investors may be picked up.  The investment
amount can get really large -- Steorn so far has been $21 million Euros.
The money is spent or squirreled away.  It can go on for years with no
product, no proper testing and no customers who can verify that the product
is real.

That's the quick version.  Is that what Rossi is?  In my mind, he fits the
script but he's more daring about demos than most  --but who knows?  The
more time goes by between the customer announcement and some credible souls
vouching for a bona fide sale and of course a proper test -- the longer it
takes, the more likely it's a scam.  Nine months and counting now.

You think people are too sophisticated to give money to scammers?  You must
read different news articles than I do.


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Mary you don't get it do you? Rossi is not selling to the public. 
Rossi's customers are engineering firms that I will assure you will not 
part with 1 dollar unless the E-Cat plant meets their min agreed conditions.


Spin this any way you try but your time here claiming scam / fraud is 
over. Rossi's payment conditions and his selected customer base has seen 
to that.


AG


On 11/12/2011 12:25 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:


On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat 
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:


Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck
does the validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that
was used to create the web site or who the web site was created by
or who it is administered by?


I agree, very little.  But it's unlikely that a prosperous and 
sophisticated company would do it that way, that's all.


I suggest the sales and payment conditions has just totally taken
the wind out of the sails of all the scam / fraud group.


Oh, Gee!  Not at all.  A common form of scam is to take money 
somewhere near the start from secret investors who sign an NDA so they 
can't talk or write on public forums.  The NDA is usually extremely 
broad in scope and if someone hints at breaking it, all sorts of 
threats of law suits begin.


Meanwhile, the perpetrators buy an ad or two or do a web page or other 
introduction, have news releases and press conferences, and announce a 
new company that promises all sorts of wonders.  They usually have 
some sort of photo op and maybe a carefully contrived demonstration 
that believers can sop up but which really proves nothing.   The next 
step is to announce that a lot of the proceeds will go to charity.  
Blogs sprout up praising the device and fantasizing what will happen 
in the future when it is widely adopted.  Skeptics are scorned and 
insulted and eventually banned from enthusiast sites.Then, the 
scammer says they won't be taking investment money now.  Maybe in the 
future they'll go public but they're doing this on their own.  The 
secret investors aren't mentioned and they can't say a peep due to 
their NDA.  They also don't want to jeopardize success and future 
profits.  Some are simply too embarrassed to speak.


Customers are announced but somehow they're never produced.  Test are 
declined if they're too definitive.  Hey, they'd reveal too many trade 
secrets.  Patents?  Sometimes it's no, sometimes it's yes, it just 
couldn't matter less (from Gigi, 1958, IMDB).


Along the way, more secret investors may be picked up.  The investment 
amount can get really large -- Steorn so far has been $21 million 
Euros.  The money is spent or squirreled away.  It can go on for years 
with no product, no proper testing and no customers who can verify 
that the product is real.


That's the quick version.  Is that what Rossi is?  In my mind, he fits 
the script but he's more daring about demos than most  --but who 
knows?  The more time goes by between the customer announcement and 
some credible souls vouching for a bona fide sale and of course a 
proper test -- the longer it takes, the more likely it's a scam.  Nine 
months and counting now.


You think people are too sophisticated to give money to scammers?  You 
must read different news articles than I do.







Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 It actually looks like a Coleman camp stove had sex with a Honda
 generator!

 I love it!


 What is really exciting is the anxiety among the s(c)eptics.  It is
 far more entertaining than any reality show on the boobtube!

NI has lots of equipment in both the ITER and the NIF.  To see them
even acknowledge that they have spoken with the likes of EFA srl is
delightful.

Today has been declared National Corduroy Day since 11/11/11/ looks so
much like corduroy.  Soon we will see, for the second time today,
11:11:11 on 11/11/11.

How many boils will need lancing?

:-)

T



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
Spin this any way you try but your time here claiming scam / fraud is over.


Sure. When you can name one customer with some reputation for credibility
and they prove they've done a proper test -- but not before, OK?

Someone at Ecatnews.com pointed out that the web site is so bad that
someone left in this name:

Prof. George Kelly (University of New Hampshire – USA)

That is a throw back to Rossi's board of directors for his silly blog he
pretends is a peer reviewed journal.  Except that the guy apparently
doesn't exist.  At least that's what I've read on the ultrareliable
internet.  Anyone know Professor Kelly personally at U of NH?


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat

You mean this:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=svsl=svtl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oru.se%2FKalendarium%2FStartsida-Kalendarium%2Foffentliga-forelasningar%2FOffentliga-forelasningar-Morgondagens-karnkraft---blir-den-kall-eller-varm-%2F

Should be interesting but I expect more news to surface before then. ;)

AG


On 11/12/2011 12:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

Kullander will talk about the ecat on 11/23.





Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 It actually looks like a Coleman camp stove had sex with a Honda
 generator!

 I love it!


 What is really exciting is the anxiety among the s(c)eptics.  It is
 far more entertaining than any reality show on the boobtube!

 NI has lots of equipment in both the ITER and the NIF.  To see them
 even acknowledge that they have spoken with the likes of EFA srl is
 delightful.

 Today has been declared National Corduroy Day since 11/11/11/ looks so
 much like corduroy.  Soon we will see, for the second time today,
 11:11:11 on 11/11/11.

 How many boils will need lancing?

It is so funny that few, if any, even understand a single word that I
speak about.  It is so very satisfying to be thought to be bonkers.
Pity that the Vortex Archive does not retain messages beyond 6 mo.s.
But google does!

T



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat

For us Aussies, yesterday was Remembrance Day:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_Day

Whole country stopped for 1 minute to remember fallen mates. :(

AG


On 11/12/2011 12:39 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
... Today has been declared National Corduroy Day since 11/11/11/ 
looks so much like corduroy. Soon we will see, for the second time 
today, 11:11:11 on 11/11/11. How many boils will need lancing? :-) T 




Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Akira Shirakawa

On 2011-11-12 02:26, Jed Rothwell wrote:

[...]

You got a problem with retro-looking HTML? You got a problem with old
programs, and old programmers?


The problem is not only that it's retro-looking (it actually is, 
however, since this is definitely not an intentional thing), but mainly 
that it's a website made in static html pages which is a very poor 
solution when there's a large amount of sections possibly subject to 
frequent changes (not only in content, but also in layout).


By using a modern CMS (Wordpress would have done the job perfectly. It's 
free, by the way) not only the website would have most probably 
immediately looked better and been better structured, but it would also 
have freed the webmasters from tweaking pages individually with an HTML 
editor, offered better managing tools, more robustness and ease of 
maintenance, etc.


Putting technical matters and lack of awareness of modern web 
technologies aside anyway, there also are a lot of puzzling things in 
the actual content such as the repeated use of the cold fusion term 
which Rossi avoided all along, the Leonardo employees list that might 
warrant Rossi a phone call or two by the U of Bologna, links to Yahoo 
groups or external sites that look very unprofessional and amateurish 
(couldn't they add their own discussion board? Or better, allow 
commenting on each page - although that would probably need a modern CMS 
again), the most probably unauthorized use of copyrighted photos, lack 
of fact checking in several passages, etc.


Really, this is an embarassement of a website. Rossi will eaten alive by 
hardcore skeptics and the mainstream media tomorrow.


Cheers,
S.A.



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Harry Veeder
If Steorn was operating a scam, why have they not been charged?



Harry

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat 
 aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:

 Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck does
 the validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that was used to
 create the web site or who the web site was created by or who it is
 administered by?


 I agree, very little.  But it's unlikely that a prosperous and
 sophisticated company would do it that way, that's all.


 I suggest the sales and payment conditions has just totally taken the
 wind out of the sails of all the scam / fraud group.


 Oh, Gee!  Not at all.  A common form of scam is to take money somewhere
 near the start from secret investors who sign an NDA so they can't talk or
 write on public forums.  The NDA is usually extremely broad in scope and if
 someone hints at breaking it, all sorts of threats of law suits begin.

 Meanwhile, the perpetrators buy an ad or two or do a web page or other
 introduction, have news releases and press conferences, and announce a new
 company that promises all sorts of wonders.  They usually have some sort of
 photo op and maybe a carefully contrived demonstration that believers can
 sop up but which really proves nothing.   The next step is to announce that
 a lot of the proceeds will go to charity.  Blogs sprout up praising the
 device and fantasizing what will happen in the future when it is widely
 adopted.  Skeptics are scorned and insulted and eventually banned from
 enthusiast sites.Then, the scammer says they won't be taking investment
 money now.  Maybe in the future they'll go public but they're doing this
 on their own.  The secret investors aren't mentioned and they can't say a
 peep due to their NDA.  They also don't want to jeopardize success and
 future profits.  Some are simply too embarrassed to speak.

 Customers are announced but somehow they're never produced.  Test are
 declined if they're too definitive.  Hey, they'd reveal too many trade
 secrets.  Patents?  Sometimes it's no, sometimes it's yes, it just
 couldn't matter less (from Gigi, 1958, IMDB).

 Along the way, more secret investors may be picked up.  The investment
 amount can get really large -- Steorn so far has been $21 million Euros.
 The money is spent or squirreled away.  It can go on for years with no
 product, no proper testing and no customers who can verify that the product
 is real.

 That's the quick version.  Is that what Rossi is?  In my mind, he fits the
 script but he's more daring about demos than most  --but who knows?  The
 more time goes by between the customer announcement and some credible souls
 vouching for a bona fide sale and of course a proper test -- the longer it
 takes, the more likely it's a scam.  Nine months and counting now.

 You think people are too sophisticated to give money to scammers?  You
 must read different news articles than I do.





Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
 For us Aussies, yesterday was Remembrance Day:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_Day

 Whole country stopped for 1 minute to remember fallen mates. :(

Australia has always been an ally in the fight for freedom.  God bless
your fallen who have died for my and your freedom.  It's Veteran's day
here in the States in honor of those who gave everything so that our
young can Occupy Whatever.  I doubt they will ever know.

T



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Please tell me how Rossi can scam a engineering firm E-Cat sales 
customer with his payment terms? He can't. Everything else you say has 
no real meaning or value. Rossi knows the meat in the sandwich is the 
meeting the claimed COP 6 performance. No one really cares who is or who 
is not on the board. Engineers say show me the performance and how you 
will support the warranty over the products life. As a engineer, my only 
real concern now is reliability and risk assessment. MTBF and MTTR stuff.


AG


On 11/12/2011 12:42 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:



Spin this any way you try but your time here claiming scam / fraud
is over.


Sure. When you can name one customer with some reputation for 
credibility and they prove they've done a proper test -- but not 
before, OK?


Someone at Ecatnews.com pointed out that the web site is so bad that 
someone left in this name:


Prof. George Kelly (University of New Hampshire – USA)

That is a throw back to Rossi's board of directors for his silly 
blog he pretends is a peer reviewed journal.  Except that the guy 
apparently doesn't exist.  At least that's what I've read on the 
ultrareliable internet.  Anyone know Professor Kelly personally at U 
of NH?







Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:

 If Steorn was operating a scam, why have they not been charged?


I don't know.  If you look at their history, it's clearly a scam.  They
also have contempt for their marks because they joke about them tacitly.
Perhaps they operate just within Irish law.  It could be a rampant scam and
still not inherently illegal if they properly warned people ahead that the
proposition was high risk.  I'm not a lawyer and I don't play one on the
internet.  Maybe one can comment.

I am intrigued by the translation from Kullander.  I wonder what he will
say.

For me, this:

An intensive discussion on the net have questioned the experiment in
Bologna mainly by it can not be explained by the established nuclear
physics theory. 

is important but it's not the main issue.  I've already said what the
important questions are.  I hope Kullander speaks to them.  I'm sure he's
already had plenty of input from plenty of people!


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:

 Please tell me how Rossi can scam a engineering firm


Perhaps I wasn't clear.  I suggested he may have scammed investors, not an
engineering firm.  Was some part of that in need of further elaboration?


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
You have suggested Rossi may have scammed investors? Bold statement 
there Mary. Care to disclose your proof as otherwise you may have just 
committed Defamation and I'm sure the Vortex administrators will not 
wish to be involved in hosting defamatory comments.


A bit of advise Mary, if I may, is that unless you have the money to 
defend a defamation action, I would suggest you be a bit more careful 
about making statement you apparently have no real proof of and are, I 
suspect, just making up to support your apparent spin efforts to 
discredit Rossi and the E-Cat. I should also point out that you can not 
hide behind a internet alias. The courts do have the ability to peal 
back the internet layers and find out who you really are.


AG


On 11/12/2011 1:06 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:



On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat 
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:


Please tell me how Rossi can scam a engineering firm


Perhaps I wasn't clear.  I suggested he may have scammed investors, 
not an engineering firm.  Was some part of that in need of further 
elaboration?




Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
Rossi does not have investors and doesn't need them right now.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

 You have suggested Rossi may have scammed investors? Bold statement there
 Mary. Care to disclose your proof as otherwise you may have just committed
 Defamation and I'm sure the Vortex administrators will not wish to be
 involved in hosting defamatory comments.

 A bit of advise Mary, if I may, is that unless you have the money to
 defend a defamation action, I would suggest you be a bit more careful about
 making statement you apparently have no real proof of and are, I suspect,
 just making up to support your apparent spin efforts to discredit Rossi and
 the E-Cat. I should also point out that you can not hide behind a internet
 alias. The courts do have the ability to peal back the internet layers and
 find out who you really are.

 AG


 On 11/12/2011 1:06 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:



 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat 
 aussieguy.e...@gmail.com 
 mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**comaussieguy.e...@gmail.com
 wrote:

Please tell me how Rossi can scam a engineering firm


 Perhaps I wasn't clear.  I suggested he may have scammed investors, not
 an engineering firm.  Was some part of that in need of further elaboration?





Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
You have suggested Rossi may have scammed investors? Bold statement there
 Mary. Care to disclose your proof as otherwise you may have just committed
 Defamation and I'm sure the Vortex administrators will not wish to be
 involved in hosting defamatory comments.

 A bit of advise Mary, if I may, is that unless you have the money to
 defend a defamation action, I would suggest you be a bit more careful about
 making statement you apparently have no real proof of and are, I suspect,
 just making up to support your apparent spin efforts to discredit Rossi and
 the E-Cat. I should also point out that you can not hide behind a internet
 alias. The courts do have the ability to peal back the internet layers and
 find out who you really are.



Wow.  I'm terrified.  Well, I'm going to be in good company in court.  FYI,
suggesting the possibility of fraud is not defamation, especially when
supported by a careful explanation.  Calling Rossi a rank, obvious scammer
would be defamation but of course, he'd have to prove he's not.   The best
proof would be to prove that the E-cat is real and works.  Oh wait... he
hasn't done that.

James Randi was sued by an obvious fraud called Sniffex back in 2006.   The
judge ordered Sniffex to demonstrate the device in court in the presence of
court appointed experts.  They dropped the suit.  Maybe I should call Rossi
names and force his hand but actually that's not my style.  The reality is
that I believed early on Rossi might have something.  Almost everything
he's said and done since has helped to disabuse me of that belief.  It
would be truly ironic if the greatest invention of the last century was
developed like Steorn (or any one of the other dozen or so silly ideas and
scams Sterling Allan pushes at any given time).  Or do you really think
Obama was on Mars?

Teleportation http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Teleportation 
*Mars visitors Basiago and Stillings confirm Barack Obama traveled to
Marshttp://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/mars-visitors-basiago-and-stillings-confirm-barack-obama-traveled-to-mars
* 
(2http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/basiago-and-eisenhower-reveal-marsgate-and-make-case-for-alternative-4|
interviewhttp://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/er-andrew_d_basiagolaura_magdalene_eisenhower_3_24_2010.mp3mp3)
- Two former participants in the CIA’s Mars visitation program of the
early 1980’s have confirmed that U.S. President Barack H. Obama was
enrolled in their Mars training class in 1980 and was among the young
Americans from the program who they later encountered on the Martian
surface after reaching Mars via “jump room.” (*Examiner*; November 6, 2011)


From http://peswiki.com/index.php/Main_Page This is the same author as
the one who did Rossi's web site!

Regrettably, the link is dead.  Probably a UFO shot it.


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:


 Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck does the
 validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that was used to create
 the web site or who the web site was created by or who it is administered
 by?


 I agree, very little.  But it's unlikely that a prosperous and
 sophisticated company would do it that way, that's all.


In what parallel universe did anyone claim that Rossi is prosperous or
sophisticated? He supposedly sold his house to finance the work. Calling
him sophisticated would be like calling my wardrobe debonair. (Fashion
statement: Sears, circa 1995, size L).

What is it with Rossi that people ascribe to him characteristics opposite
from his actual ones? As I pointed out Krivit calls him strategic,
articulate, charming. Umm . . . none of the above.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
You claimed Rossi may have scammed investors. Prove it or stop making up 
statement that you may wish to be real.


BTW to engineers, he has proved the E-Cat works and that is all he needs 
to do. Why? Because his customers are engineering firms who do know how 
to measure the heat the E-Cat generates and how much energy it consumes. 
Case closed.



AG


On 11/12/2011 1:39 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:



You have suggested Rossi may have scammed investors? Bold
statement there Mary. Care to disclose your proof as otherwise you
may have just committed Defamation and I'm sure the Vortex
administrators will not wish to be involved in hosting defamatory
comments.

A bit of advise Mary, if I may, is that unless you have the money
to defend a defamation action, I would suggest you be a bit more
careful about making statement you apparently have no real proof
of and are, I suspect, just making up to support your apparent
spin efforts to discredit Rossi and the E-Cat. I should also point
out that you can not hide behind a internet alias. The courts do
have the ability to peal back the internet layers and find out who
you really are.



Wow.  I'm terrified.  Well, I'm going to be in good company in court.  
FYI, suggesting the possibility of fraud is not defamation, especially 
when supported by a careful explanation.  Calling Rossi a rank, 
obvious scammer would be defamation but of course, he'd have to prove 
he's not.   The best proof would be to prove that the E-cat is real 
and works.  Oh wait... he hasn't done that.


James Randi was sued by an obvious fraud called Sniffex back in 
2006.   The judge ordered Sniffex to demonstrate the device in court 
in the presence of court appointed experts.  They dropped the suit.  
Maybe I should call Rossi names and force his hand but actually that's 
not my style.  The reality is that I believed early on Rossi might 
have something.  Almost everything he's said and done since has helped 
to disabuse me of that belief.  It would be truly ironic if the 
greatest invention of the last century was developed like Steorn (or 
any one of the other dozen or so silly ideas and scams Sterling Allan 
pushes at any given time).  Or do you really think Obama was on Mars?


Teleportation http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Teleportation 
*Mars visitors Basiago and Stillings confirm Barack Obama traveled to 
Mars 
http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/mars-visitors-basiago-and-stillings-confirm-barack-obama-traveled-to-mars* 
(2 
http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/basiago-and-eisenhower-reveal-marsgate-and-make-case-for-alternative-4 
| interview 
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/er-andrew_d_basiagolaura_magdalene_eisenhower_3_24_2010.mp3 
mp3) - Two former participants in the CIA’s Mars visitation program of 
the early 1980’s have confirmed that U.S. President Barack H. Obama 
was enrolled in their Mars training class in 1980 and was among the 
young Americans from the program who they later encountered on the 
Martian surface after reaching Mars via “jump room.” (/Examiner/; 
November 6, 2011) 


From http://peswiki.com/index.php/Main_Page This is the same 
author as the one who did Rossi's web site!


Regrettably, the link is dead.  Probably a UFO shot it.




Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:

 You claimed Rossi may have scammed investors. Prove it or stop making up
 statement that you may wish to be real.


You're making stuff up.  I already said I wish Rossi would be real.  And
yes, he may have scammed investors.  He also might not.  I believe that
covers it.


 BTW to engineers, he has proved the E-Cat works and that is all he needs
 to do. Why? Because his customers are engineering firms who do know how to
 measure the heat the E-Cat generates and how much energy it consumes. Case
 closed.


I have no idea how you know his customers are anything.  He never named
them.  He never showed a customer!  Supposedly there was an engineer from
the buyer.  Nobody could confirm that he was.  Interestingly, he was at the
exit interview and nobody seemed to ask him anything difficult.  Did they
even ask anything of the engineer?

No other client possibilities have emerged.  NI certainly is not one
despite Craig Brown's foolishly premature post.  The case is far from
closed.

I doubt that Rossi will ever scam an engineering firm, a big power company,
a prestigious factory that needs a heater or anyone who has capable people
on staff.  Certainly he won't scam money out of anyone who consults with
Rothwell or Cude or Lawrence or Heffner or Murray or many of the people who
write regularly on this list that I may not yet know.That doesn't mean
he can't bamboozle a few investors who have more money than good sense.
Maybe already has or is planning to soon.  I have no idea.  What Rossi does
seems to me to not make much sense.  That new web site is an example.
It's just weird.

I don't mean to hurt your feelings. You seem really enamored of this thing.
  If I upset you that much, maybe you'd prefer I not respond to you?


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
Rossi does not have investors and never asked for them

-- Forwarded message --
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/11/12
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com


You claimed Rossi may have scammed investors. Prove it or stop making up
statement that you may wish to be real.

BTW to engineers, he has proved the E-Cat works and that is all he needs to
do. Why? Because his customers are engineering firms who do know how to
measure the heat the E-Cat generates and how much energy it consumes. Case
closed.


AG


Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Harry Veeder
I think Steorn stumbled upon a real anomally but they erred in assuming
that measurement alone was sufficient to demonstrate the reality of energy
creation.
Harry


at 9:34 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:

 If Steorn was operating a scam, why have they not been charged?


 I don't know.  If you look at their history, it's clearly a scam.  They
 also have contempt for their marks because they joke about them tacitly.
 Perhaps they operate just within Irish law.  It could be a rampant scam and
 still not inherently illegal if they properly warned people ahead that the
 proposition was high risk.  I'm not a lawyer and I don't play one on the
 internet.  Maybe one can comment.

 I am intrigued by the translation from Kullander.  I wonder what he will
 say.

 For me, this:

 An intensive discussion on the net have questioned the experiment in
 Bologna mainly by it can not be explained by the established nuclear
 physics theory. 

 is important but it's not the main issue.  I've already said what the
 important questions are.  I hope Kullander speaks to them.  I'm sure he's
 already had plenty of input from plenty of people!



Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around saying you think 
Rossi may have scammed investors. That is defamation. You don't know if 
he has any investors, do you? You don't know how he raised his funding 
do you? Well he did that by selling a business and selling his house.


AG


On 11/12/2011 2:08 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:



On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat 
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:


You claimed Rossi may have scammed investors. Prove it or stop
making up statement that you may wish to be real.


You're making stuff up.  I already said I wish Rossi would be real.  
And yes, he may have scammed investors.  He also might not.  I believe 
that covers it.


BTW to engineers, he has proved the E-Cat works and that is all he
needs to do. Why? Because his customers are engineering firms who
do know how to measure the heat the E-Cat generates and how much
energy it consumes. Case closed.


I have no idea how you know his customers are anything.  He never 
named them.  He never showed a customer!  Supposedly there was an 
engineer from the buyer.  Nobody could confirm that he was.  
Interestingly, he was at the exit interview and nobody seemed to ask 
him anything difficult.  Did they even ask anything of the engineer?


No other client possibilities have emerged.  NI certainly is not one 
despite Craig Brown's foolishly premature post.  The case is far from 
closed.


I doubt that Rossi will ever scam an engineering firm, a big power 
company, a prestigious factory that needs a heater or anyone who has 
capable people on staff.  Certainly he won't scam money out of anyone 
who consults with Rothwell or Cude or Lawrence or Heffner or Murray or 
many of the people who write regularly on this list that I may not yet 
know.That doesn't mean he can't bamboozle a few investors who have 
more money than good sense.  Maybe already has or is planning to 
soon.  I have no idea.  What Rossi does seems to me to not make much 
sense.  That new web site is an example.   It's just weird.


I don't mean to hurt your feelings. You seem really enamored of this 
thing.   If I upset you that much, maybe you'd prefer I not respond to 
you?






Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked around for investors,
you are provoking troll attacks, because you are creating a strawman for
Rossi. Thus, you are helping with the mess around here.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

 Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around saying you think
 Rossi may have scammed investors. That is defamation. You don't know if he
 has any investors, do you? You don't know how he raised his funding do you?
 Well he did that by selling a business and selling his house.

 AG





Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had any. From what I 
have read he doesn't need them and has self funded this project.


AG


On 11/12/2011 2:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked around for 
investors, you are provoking troll attacks, because you are creating a 
strawman for Rossi. Thus, you are helping with the mess around here.


2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com 
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around saying you
think Rossi may have scammed investors. That is defamation. You
don't know if he has any investors, do you? You don't know how he
raised his funding do you? Well he did that by selling a business
and selling his house.

AG






Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
You answer to someone as you were acknowledging such fact.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

 Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had any. From what I
 have read he doesn't need them and has self funded this project.

 AG



 On 11/12/2011 2:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

 Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked around for investors,
 you are provoking troll attacks, because you are creating a strawman for
 Rossi. Thus, you are helping with the mess around here.

 2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:
 aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around saying you
think Rossi may have scammed investors. That is defamation. You
don't know if he has any investors, do you? You don't know how he
raised his funding do you? Well he did that by selling a business
and selling his house.

AG






Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
I cautioned that making statements of scamming investors, when those 
statement can not be proven, is defamation. My statements in no way give 
support to those making scamming statements.


AG


On 11/12/2011 2:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

You answer to someone as you were acknowledging such fact.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com 
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had any. From
what I have read he doesn't need them and has self funded this
project.

AG



On 11/12/2011 2:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked around for
investors, you are provoking troll attacks, because you are
creating a strawman for Rossi. Thus, you are helping with the
mess around here.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


   Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around
saying you
   think Rossi may have scammed investors. That is defamation. You
   don't know if he has any investors, do you? You don't know
how he
   raised his funding do you? Well he did that by selling a
business
   and selling his house.

   AG








Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
But you cannot say that is defamatory if there is no investors.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

 I cautioned that making statements of scamming investors, when those
 statement can not be proven, is defamation. My statements in no way give
 support to those making scamming statements.

 AG



 On 11/12/2011 2:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

 You answer to someone as you were acknowledging such fact.

 2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:
 aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had any. From
what I have read he doesn't need them and has self funded this
project.

AG



On 11/12/2011 2:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked around for
investors, you are provoking troll attacks, because you are
creating a strawman for Rossi. Thus, you are helping with the
mess around here.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


   Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around
saying you
   think Rossi may have scammed investors. That is defamation. You
   don't know if he has any investors, do you? You don't know
how he
   raised his funding do you? Well he did that by selling a
business
   and selling his house.

   AG








Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Defamation is the act of making a false statements with the intent to 
cause loss of reputation plus a few more. Suggesting to someone that the 
statement they just made may be defamatory, in no way supports the 
defamatory statement.


AG


On 11/12/2011 2:57 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

But you cannot say that is defamatory if there is no investors.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com 
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


I cautioned that making statements of scamming investors, when
those statement can not be proven, is defamation. My statements in
no way give support to those making scamming statements.

AG



On 11/12/2011 2:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

You answer to someone as you were acknowledging such fact.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


   Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had
any. From
   what I have read he doesn't need them and has self funded this
   project.

   AG



   On 11/12/2011 2:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

   Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked
around for
   investors, you are provoking troll attacks, because you are
   creating a strawman for Rossi. Thus, you are helping
with the
   mess around here.

   2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


  Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around
   saying you
  think Rossi may have scammed investors. That is
defamation. You
  don't know if he has any investors, do you? You
don't know
   how he
  raised his funding do you? Well he did that by selling a
   business
  and selling his house.

  AG










Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
Would you give me a practical example? I just cannot understand how can
someone lose reputation with something it doesn't exist.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

 Defamation is the act of making a false statements with the intent to
 cause loss of reputation plus a few more. Suggesting to someone that the
 statement they just made may be defamatory, in no way supports the
 defamatory statement.

 AG



 On 11/12/2011 2:57 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

 But you cannot say that is defamatory if there is no investors.

 2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:
 aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


I cautioned that making statements of scamming investors, when
those statement can not be proven, is defamation. My statements in
no way give support to those making scamming statements.

AG



On 11/12/2011 2:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

You answer to someone as you were acknowledging such fact.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


   Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had
any. From
   what I have read he doesn't need them and has self funded this
   project.

   AG



   On 11/12/2011 2:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

   Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked
around for
   investors, you are provoking troll attacks, because you are
   creating a strawman for Rossi. Thus, you are helping
with the
   mess around here.

   2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


  Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around
   saying you
  think Rossi may have scammed investors. That is
defamation. You
  don't know if he has any investors, do you? You
don't know
   how he
  raised his funding do you? Well he did that by selling a
   business
  and selling his house.

  AG










Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
That is the point. Rossi committed no act of scamming, so claiming Rossi 
had scammed is the act of defamation with intent to cause loss of 
reputation.


AG


On 11/12/2011 3:29 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Would you give me a practical example? I just cannot understand how 
can someone lose reputation with something it doesn't exist.


2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com 
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


Defamation is the act of making a false statements with the intent
to cause loss of reputation plus a few more. Suggesting to someone
that the statement they just made may be defamatory, in no way
supports the defamatory statement.

AG



On 11/12/2011 2:57 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

But you cannot say that is defamatory if there is no investors.

2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


   I cautioned that making statements of scamming investors, when
   those statement can not be proven, is defamation. My
statements in
   no way give support to those making scamming statements.

   AG



   On 11/12/2011 2:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

   You answer to someone as you were acknowledging such fact.

   2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


  Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had
   any. From
  what I have read he doesn't need them and has self
funded this
  project.

  AG



  On 11/12/2011 2:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

  Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked
   around for
  investors, you are provoking troll attacks,
because you are
  creating a strawman for Rossi. Thus, you are helping
   with the
  mess around here.

  2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com

mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com


 Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't
go around
  saying you
 think Rossi may have scammed investors. That is
   defamation. You
 don't know if he has any investors, do you? You
   don't know
  how he
 raised his funding do you? Well he did that
by selling a
  business
 and selling his house.

 AG












Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-11 Thread Mary Yugo
Yikes!

Defamation would be:  Rossi is a scammer
A personal opinion and perfectly legal:  Rossi may be a scammer (also he
may not be one).  Freedom of speech on that one, I think.

Really -- I had this issue come up before and I checked with an attorney
who specializes in it.  There's no defamation in suggestion a possibility.
And the first sentence is only defamation if Rossi is not a scammer and can
prove it in court.  I'm not sure he could!  He'd have to show to the
court's satisfaction that the E-cat was real and worked as advertised!
Would he do that?  He sure hasn't so far.

Does Rossi have investors?  Does Rossi have customers?  Did Rossi use his
own money?  Did Rossi sell his house?  Well I suppose we could check on the
sale but we still wouldn't know the motive if he did sell a house.  But on
the other issues, the only thing you're going on is WHAT ROSSI SAID!  Why
do you do that?  How in the world would you know if Rossi had secret
investors and how can you know he doesn't?   Yet you believe him when he
says he has a secret client.  Sorry but this is too funny for words.