Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
Hank Mills November 28th, 2011 at 1:15 AM Hello Andrea, I apologize if Im not controlling my passion about this topic quite as well as I should. I think the lies of the cynics and competitors (which I read everyday), are making me a bit more angry than usual. Out of jealousy and envy, they are trying to mislead the world about the biggest breakthrough of this century, and it infuriates me. I completely realize all decisions are yours to make. Being on the outside looking in, I just wish there was more I could do to contribute towards making the world accept the reality of this technology. If additional tests are not appropriate, I will respect your decision completely and totally. If there is anything I can do to help you in anyway, please let me know. Sincerely, Hank Mills Andrea Rossi November 28th, 2011 at 1:15 AM Dear Hank Mills (regarding the answer to RH): I am very sorry, but I must say I do not agree on the fact that further public tests could have any importance, the puppett-snakes would increase the attacks ( they are paid for this from the puppetteers) and the Customers would be disturbed from the exposition. The real duty now is to make good working plants. Nevertheless I have deep respect for your intellectual honesty, I know you want to help us; I just do not agree. New public tests could only make me lose time just to replicate the usual clownery rising with the usual aggression, whatever we do; by the way: if they think that this technology does not work, I wonder: why are they so aggressive against it? If it doesnt work, it will die by itself; for example: there are around many wannabe competitors I know perfectly have nothing working really: did you ever see any comment of mine regarding their work? Did you ever read an attack from me to a competitor regarding the fiascos of their stuff? (and believe me: I know everything of everybody). Warm Regards, A.R. Hank Mills November 28th, 2011 at 1:23 AM Andrea, To answer your question, I have never read a statement from you belittling anyone in the cold fusion field, their testing, theories, or their work. The only individuals you have spoken up against, are the ones that have attacked you first with espionage attempts, lies, blackmail, etc. They deserved to be addressed, and put in their place. You are a very polite and respectful person. I admire how you can be so respectful despite a 16 hour a day work schedule, and so much stress. I think most of the anger and hostility out there is fairly easy to explain. I think it is pure envy and jealousy. Out of no where, you have suddenly came onto the alternative energy scene with the most promising technology imaginable. The fuel is cheap, there is no pollution, no radioactivity is emitted, and it is totally safe. In addition, the output capacity is phenomenal. They simply cant believe what is happening, and are lashing out. To be blunt, the introduction of your technology in 2011, is like dropping in a brand new, high end sports car back in time to the year 1920. The automakers of the time would have responded just like your competitors are responding today. They cant fathom the significance of your discovery, and they are letting their emotions control them. Sincerely, Hank Mills
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
On 11-11-28 12:28 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: [ ... ] Andrea Rossi November 28th, 2011 at 1:15 AM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=35#comment-133038 Dear Hank Mills (regarding the answer to RH): I am very sorry, but I must say I do not agree on the fact that further public tests could have any importance, the puppett-snakes would increase the attacks ( they are paid for this from the puppetteers) HEY -- somebody's paying people to say bad stuff about Rossi? Who? Can I get some of it, if I get back onto Vortex and come out hard against Rossi? Or maybe if I start posting in his forum? I've got a website -- will somebody pay me to put up an anti-Rossi page? Wow, this sounds like an opportunity!
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: Hank Mills November 28th, 2011 at 1:15 AMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=35#comment-133037 Hello Andrea, I apologize if I’m not controlling my passion about this topic quite as well as I should. I think the lies of the cynics and competitors (which I read everyday), are making me a bit more angry than usual. Out of jealousy and envy, they are trying to mislead the world about the biggest breakthrough of this century, and it infuriates me. SNIP A couple of other things Hank (and Sterling) are passionate about: Freddy's Cell which allows a truck to run only on water: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:_Hydrogen_Hog_by_Future_Energy_Concepts,_Inc. Papp's self running noble gas engine: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Plasma_Energy_Controls%27_Plasma_Expansion_Motor And that's before we get to all the scams and self-deceptions they have supported in the past and their current support for government mind control via HAARP! These guys are simply comical. If something they support works, it has to be by accident.
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
Yes, I will sign up too. Alan we miss the bandwagon. I guess Mary is taking all the money. G On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote: ** On 11-11-28 12:28 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: [ ... ] Andrea Rossi November 28th, 2011 at 1:15 AMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=35#comment-133038 Dear Hank Mills (regarding the answer to RH): I am very sorry, but I must say I do not agree on the fact that further public tests could have any importance, the puppett-snakes would increase the attacks ( they are paid for this from the puppetteers) HEY -- somebody's paying people to say bad stuff about Rossi? Who? Can I get some of it, if I get back onto Vortex and come out hard against Rossi? Or maybe if I start posting in his forum? I've got a website -- will somebody pay me to put up an anti-Rossi page? Wow, this sounds like an opportunity!
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Giovanni Santostasi gsantost...@gmail.comwrote: Yes, I will sign up too. Alan we miss the bandwagon. I guess Mary is taking all the money. G You can have the Rossi business. I'm concentrating on debunking Hugh Deasy's antigravity machine. Boeing is paying me -- they'd be out of business if Deasy's machine could power airplanes. Deasy was (maybe still is) a vocal Steorn supporter. Deasy, who has an extensive education and an excellent job and should know better, does stuff like this supposed antigravity device: http://www.youtube.com/user/steornhugh#p/u/6/IWSl7P1iitQ This is his blog! http://hdeasy.blogspot.com/2009/12/steorn-demo-in-few-days.html
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
They do not pay us enough :-) The hours are long and the pay is short. -Original Message- From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 12:38 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test On 11-11-28 12:28 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: [ ... ] Andrea Rossi November 28th, 2011 at 1:15 AM Dear Hank Mills (regarding the answer to RH): I am very sorry, but I must say I do not agree on the fact that further public tests could have any importance, the puppett-snakes would increase the attacks ( they are paid for this from the puppetteers) HEY -- somebody's paying people to say bad stuff about Rossi? Who? Can I get some of it, if I get back onto Vortex and come out hard against Rossi? Or maybe if I start posting in his forum? I've got a website -- will somebody pay me to put up an anti-Rossi page? Wow, this sounds like an opportunity!
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
On Nov 28, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Mary Yugo wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Giovanni Santostasi gsantost...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I will sign up too. Alan we miss the bandwagon. I guess Mary is taking all the money. G You can have the Rossi business. I'm concentrating on debunking Hugh Deasy's antigravity machine. Boeing is paying me -- they'd be out of business if Deasy's machine could power airplanes. Deasy was (maybe still is) a vocal Steorn supporter. Deasy, who has an extensive education and an excellent job and should know better, does stuff like this supposed antigravity device: http://www.youtube.com/user/steornhugh#p/u/6/IWSl7P1iitQ This is his blog! http://hdeasy.blogspot.com/2009/12/steorn-demo- in-few-days.html That is so stupid I can't believe it. I have a commercially available toy robot bug that works using 6 vibrating legs, but moves 10 times as fast. Anybody ever heard of the difference between sliding and static friction? Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
I agree Horace. This is pathetic. Dave -Original Message- From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 1:45 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test On Nov 28, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Mary Yugo wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Giovanni Santostasi gsantost...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I will sign up too. Alan we miss the bandwagon. I guess Mary is taking all the money. G You can have the Rossi business. I'm concentrating on debunking Hugh Deasy's antigravity machine. Boeing is paying me -- they'd be out of business if Deasy's machine could power airplanes. Deasy was (maybe still is) a vocal Steorn supporter. Deasy, who has an extensive education and an excellent job and should know better, does stuff like this supposed antigravity device: http://www.youtube.com/user/steornhugh#p/u/6/IWSl7P1iitQ This is his blog! http://hdeasy.blogspot.com/2009/12/steorn-demo-in-few-days.html That is so stupid I can't believe it. I have a commercially available toy robot bug that works using 6 vibrating legs, but moves 10 times as fast. Anybody ever heard of the difference between sliding and static friction? Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: I agree Horace. This is pathetic. Dave Deasy, IIRC, has a PhD in a physical science or engineering and is a flight dynamics specialist by profession. He supported Steorn and for all I know, still believes that have a free energy magnetic motor. He tried and failed to replicate it many times. I am not a supporter of guilt by association so I suppose it's a bit trivial that he also ardently supports Rossi: http://hdeasy.blogspot.com/
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
Am 28.11.2011 22:01, schrieb Mary Yugo: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com mailto:dlrober...@aol.com wrote: I agree Horace. This is pathetic. Dave Deasy, IIRC, has a PhD in a physical science or engineering and is a flight dynamics specialist by profession. He supported Steorn and for all I know, still believes that have a free energy magnetic motor. He tried and failed to replicate it many times. I am not a supporter of guilt by association so I suppose it's a bit trivial that he also ardently supports Rossi: http://hdeasy.blogspot.com/ Aah now I see, it this is this guy: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_L50cxskxyQw/TKmSDtQ5iqI/BKw/4-Jfnncch1M/s1600/steorn_vid.JPG I think he supports it, because it work for him. Or would somebody do such a video without compensation? Believe pays off. If you are a high-priest of the cult.
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote: Am 28.11.2011 22:01, schrieb Mary Yugo: Aah now I see, it this is this guy: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_L50cxskxyQw/TKmSDtQ5iqI/BKw/4-Jfnncch1M/s1600/steorn_vid.JPGhttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/_L50cxskxyQw/TKmSDtQ5iqI/BKw/4-Jfnncch1M/s1600/steorn_vid.JPG I think he supports it, because it work for him. Or would somebody do such a video without compensation? Believe pays off. If you are a high-priest of the cult. I don't recall if there was proof, but it seemed clear that the endorsement of Steorn by Deasy and three engineers was paid for. The three engineers were dubbed the three blind mice on Steorn's forum in acknowledgement of the fairy tale as well as the wonderful original Bond movie Dr. No.
Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: Hank Mills November 21st, 2011 at 11:24 PM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=1#comment-126865 Cremating Thermal Inertia With A Custom E-Cat TestSNIP As I've been saying ad nauseam et exhaustiam, it's a great concept but it won't work unless it's the same E-cat and of course nothing changes on the measuring system between the control and the live tests. Rossi could easily fake a test if he knew which E-cat was the control device. And such a test should be run and observed by people other than Rossi -- Rossi can be there but should keep hands in his pockets at all time. The live part would have to run long enough to rule out the usual suspects -- sources of chemical energy, molten metal heat stores, etc. that Rossi might trigger remotely or have an accomplice trigger. In Hank's world, everything is simple. You can see that by the web site he writes for. They're the ones with the free energy magnetic motors developed in a garage by an impoverished illiterate in a third world country along with the cars that only require water to run. Still, asking for something like that is a step forward for Hank.
