Re: Retry even when Connection Refused
Ahmon Dancy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please consider this patch: [...] It looks good to me. Cheating about whether the connection was really refused looks slightly wrong, but on the other hand, changing every single place that looks at the result is tedious. Please note that patches should be sent as unified or context diffs (`diff -u' or `diff -c'). I'll apply it shortly.
Re: --disable-dns-cache
Mauro Tortonesi wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Jeremy Reeve wrote: I've written a trivial patch to implement the --disable-dns-cache feature as described in the TODO contained in the CVS tree. I need to write the Changelog entry which I'll do and post to the patches list ASAP. you should probably not bother writing it. That's not quite true. from the PATCHES file included in the wget distribution: ** ChangeLog policy. Each patch should be accompanied by an update to the appropriate ChangeLog file. *** Please don't mail patches to ChangeLog because they have an extremely high rate of failure; just mail us the new part of the ChangeLog you added. *** [I added the highlight] Perhaps the wording should have been more clear, but this means: please do write the ChangeLog entry and send it, but don't send an actual DIFF of the old and new ChangeLog, because such diffs don't apply cleanly more often than not. That is reiterated here: Patches without a ChangeLog entry will be accepted, but this creates additional work for the maintainers, so *** please do write the ChangeLog entries. *** you're right, hrvoje. when i answered jeremy's mail i was in a hurry. what i wanted to say is: you should probably not bother writing a correctly formatted ChangeLog, but just send a simple report of the changes you've made. That contradicts Hrvoje, and really doesn't make sense. Jeremy *should* write a properly formatted ChangeLog. As author of his changes, he is the best person to summarize exactly what they do. Why not do so in the standard form of a ChangeLog entry? To do otherwise is to push more work onto Hrvoje. Max.
Hostname bug in wget ...
... or a silly sleepless webmaster !? Hi, Version == I use the GNU wget version 1.7 which is found on OpenBSD Release 3.3 CD. I use it on i386 architecture. How to reproduce == wget -r coolibri.com (adding the span hosts option did not improve) Problem category = There seems to be a problem with prepending wrong hostnames. Problem more detailed Between fine GETs there are lots of 404s caused by prepending wrong hostnames. That website consists of several parts distributed on several subdomains. coolibri.com cpu-kuehler.coolibri.com luefter.coolibri.com etc. Example: = wget tries to get files that are located on cpu-kuehler.coolibri.com but does not prepend cpu-kuehler.coolibri.com but coolibri.com only. Instead of (correct) http://cpu- kuehler.coolibri.com/80_Kuehler_Grafik_Grafikkarte_/80_kuehler_grafik_grafikkarte_ .html it tries (incorrect) http://coolibri.com/80_Kuehler_Grafik_Grafikkarte_/80_kuehler_grafik_grafikkarte_.h tml Tried my best not to waste your time - but some lack of sleep during last week was not really helpful ;-) Best regards Klaus
Re: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: If you have patches for Wget's configure.in to work with Autoconf 2.5x, I'll gladly accept those, too. Please note that the changes to support lone autoconf 2.5x are minimal and almost exclusively m4 quotation corrections. I think I sent a patch proposal here some time ago -- I can resend the changes if there is interest. Changes for automake (if you select this way) are another story. Maciej -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--+ +e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP key available+
Re: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: If you have patches for Wget's configure.in to work with Autoconf 2.5x, I'll gladly accept those, too. Please note that the changes to support lone autoconf 2.5x are minimal and almost exclusively m4 quotation corrections. I think I sent a patch proposal here some time ago -- I can resend the changes if there is interest. Please do that if you can. Thanks.
Re: Retry even when Connection Refused
Ahmon Dancy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please consider this patch: [...] It looks good to me. Cheating about whether the connection was really refused looks slightly wrong, but on the other hand, changing every single place that looks at the result is tedious. I did consider that but I came to the same conclusion. Please note that patches should be sent as unified or context diffs (`diff -u' or `diff -c'). Sorry about that. :) I'll apply it shortly. Thanks. Is there a wget-announce mailing list?
