Re: [xmail] Web Mail
I'm using UMPL for Xmailserver ( http://dev.waaf.net/xmail/ ) the link is on xmailserver.org as well. In another location I'm using UebiMiau ( http://www.uebimiau.org/ ) I like the UMPL much better. Filip Supera wrote: Edmonds, J.B. : Probably asked 100 times but I need a decent webmail product to use with xmail on Windows. Does SquirrelMail work? I'm afraid it needs IMAP. What other suggestions are there? Basic read, send mail and address book Have-you tried the PHP ones (Ilohamail, Uebimiau) ? ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] Re: glst issue with trips not being recognized
Thanks for your response, Francis, I appreciate it. Am I missing something? Is there a specific glst log that I can't find? I don't see any options in the docs that suggest it. /var/log/messages doesn't hold anything. I thought only the smtp logs would hold the data (the EFILTER entries signifying the rejection). I'm also a bit confused on the xnet entries and I hope someone can shed some light on this. Maybe I'm just IP stupid, but in my glst.conf (which admittedly I compiled from other examples on the web) I have these entries. xnet=64.233.184.0,255.255.255.0 xnet=65.82.241.160,255.255.255.255 xnet=217.158.50.178,255.255.255.255 If adding new entries, how would you determine the subnet to use? Wouldn't the broadcast (255.255.255.255) handle it? I find it strange that two class A addresses are using different subnets. In the mnet entries I'm also confused. How is the subnet determined (or found) here? mnet=65.52.0.0,255.255.255.0,255.252.0.0 mnet=64.4.0.0,255.255.255.0,255.255.192.0 Wow, after looking at these I just had the realization that I'm not IP stupid, just IP ignorant... Thanks! CLEMENT Francis wrote: -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dale Qualls Envoy=E9 : mercredi 30 avril 2008 04:09 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] glst issue with trips not being recognized Davide (or anyone): First of all, thanks in advance for any help I can get on this. I'm using glst (and love it) and have now run into my first (and=20 hopefully my last :-) problem. I'm just looking for an=20 explanation as=20 it doesn't make sense to me. Messages from the below listed=20 clientdomain.com aren't coming through, they just keep getting=20 rejected over and over again. (my glst.conf is at the end). Can I put in the following line at the end of my glst.conf=20 (although I'd=20 rather not have to but I don't know why this trip won't get accepted): xnet=3D208.65.144.78,255.255.255.255 Here's all of the info that I have: I have this entry in my glst.dbm: 208.65.144.0,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] 00;rtime=3D48172665,mtime=3D4817afea,mcnt=3D0,acnt=3D20\x00 I have these entries in my smtp log: maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 13:52:30 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S2FFE32B =20 RCPT=3DOK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 13:52:30 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S2FFE32B =20 DATA=3DEFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 13:56:25 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S2FFE4CF =20 RCPT=3DOK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 13:56:27 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S2FFE4CF =20 DATA=3DEFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 14:56:57 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S30006F6 =20 RCPT=3DOK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 14:57:09 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S30006F6 =20 DATA=3DEFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 15:26:22 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3001D65 =20 RCPT=3DOK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 15:26:24 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3001D65 =20 DATA=3DEFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 15:56:22 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3002962 =20 RCPT=3DOK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 15:56:23 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3002962 =20 DATA=3DEFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 16:26:37 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S300396F =20 RCPT=3DOK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 16:26:38 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S300396F =20 DATA=3DEFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29=20 16:56:46 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
[xmail] another glst example of not picking up trips
It took 10 hours (as the sending server only resends every 2 hours) for this message to get accepted. Any thoughts?? I'm have to pull glst back out for now, it's delaying our mail way too much. In the logs below I have only changed the mydomain.com address. Everything else is exactly as cut from the log. pmnhg.net is the xmail server that receive messages from the internet and forwards them to mydomain.com. mydomain.com does not accept any smtp connections directly, only from my xmail server. The from address, to address and sending IP is the same in every entry, what could cause this? Is it in any way case sensitive? Here is the entry in the glst.gdm database: MX2:/var/MailRoot/bin # grep -i 303capital.com dale.txt 38.106.154.0,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED];rtime=48175573,mtime=4817cde6,mcnt=0,acnt=15\x00 Thanks for any guidance that anyone can offer!! MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep -i 303capital.com smtp-20080429 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 12:05:55 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFA8C1 RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 12:05:55 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFA8C1 DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 12:16:50 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFB06E RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 12:16:50 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFB06E DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 12:27:49 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFB524 RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 12:27:49 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFB524 DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 14:08:49 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFEAB8 RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 14:08:50 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFEAB8 DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 14:19:48 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFEF1B RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 14:19:48 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFEF1B DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 14:30:50 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFF516 RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 14:30:50 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S2FFF516 DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 16:11:48 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S3002E16 RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 16:11:48 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S3002E16 DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 16:22:48 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S300369E RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 16:22:49 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S300369E DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 16:33:49 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S3003EDC RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 16:33:49 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S3003EDC DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 18:14:48 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S30066AC RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 18:14:48 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S30066AC DATA=EFILTER0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 38.106.154.25 2008-04-29 18:25:49 MGATE.tjmbrokerage.commydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]S3006938 RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net
[xmail] Re: another glst example of not picking up trips
I'll be darned. I just turned on the logs and did a quick test and the
logging works fine. I can't believe I never knew that was there...
These logs could have helped me several times.
The database on one server was 21MB. I do a --cleanup once a day,
maybe I'll do that a bit more often. After the cleanup I just did it's
down to 6MB.
Your info on the IP addresses is excellent, thank you.
I have an additional mnet question for you though.
How would I actually know what the subnet is that is used for the host IP
address? It effectively could be anything, right? From a /8 to a /30.
Thanks Francis, you are a huge help!
**snip**
In the mnet entries I'm also confused. How is the subnet=20
determined (or found) here?
mnet=65.52.0.0,255.255.255.0,255.252.0.0
mnet=64.4.0.0,255.255.255.0,255.255.192.0
'mnet' syntax : mnet=Network_Ip,Matching_Network_Mask,Glst_Network_Mask
So consider a mnet as two networks definitions :
Matching Network to apply this mnet entry : Network_Ip with mask
Matching_Network_Mask
Resulting Network after applying this mnet entry : Network_Ip with
Glst_Network_Mask
For this mnet rule mnet=65.52.0.0,255.255.255.0,255.252.0.0 you get:
For any input ip from 65.52.0.x range ('matched' with 65.52.0.0 mask
255.255.255.0), apply the second mask to obtain the resulting ip that
will be entered in glst database so here
65.52.0.0 (65.52.0.x (original ip) masked with 255.252.0.0)
If where is NO other rule for 65.53 to 65.55 networks, this rule is =
just 'strange' but functionnal. If where is another active mnet using
65.53 to 65.55 networks like this = one
65.54.0.0,255.255.255.0,255.252.0.0 the resulting ip will be =
65.52.0.0 too, 'mapping' from one network to another. If it's not the
same ip = owner, this could be a problem (bypass glst). The rule
mnet=3D65.52.0.0,255.255.255.0,255.255.0.0 will do exaclty the = same
think without this 'cross networks' problem. Except very rare cases, the
'Glst_Network_Mask' is at least same or = more 'restrictive' than the
'Matching_Network_Mask'
**snip**
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] glst issue with trips not being recognized
Davide (or anyone): First of all, thanks in advance for any help I can get on this. I'm using glst (and love it) and have now run into my first (and hopefully my last :-) problem. I'm just looking for an explanation as it doesn't make sense to me. Messages from the below listed clientdomain.com aren't coming through, they just keep getting rejected over and over again. (my glst.conf is at the end). Can I put in the following line at the end of my glst.conf (although I'd rather not have to but I don't know why this trip won't get accepted): xnet=208.65.144.78,255.255.255.255 Here's all of the info that I have: I have this entry in my glst.dbm: 208.65.144.0,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED];rtime=48172665,mtime=4817afea,mcnt=0,acnt=20\x00 I have these entries in my smtp log: maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 13:52:30 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S2FFE32B RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 13:52:30 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S2FFE32B DATA=EFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 13:56:25 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S2FFE4CF RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 13:56:27 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S2FFE4CF DATA=EFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 14:56:57 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S30006F6 RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 14:57:09 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S30006F6 DATA=EFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 15:26:22 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3001D65 RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 15:26:24 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3001D65 DATA=EFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 15:56:22 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3002962 RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 15:56:23 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3002962 DATA=EFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 16:26:37 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S300396F RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 16:26:38 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S300396F DATA=EFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 16:56:46 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3004A8D RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 16:56:47 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3004A8D DATA=EFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 17:26:22 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S30057F7 RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 17:26:22 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S30057F7 DATA=EFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 17:56:21 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3006172 RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 17:56:21 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3006172 DATA=EFILTER0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 18:31:54 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3006A9A RCPT=OK 0 maildomain.net maildomain.net 208.65.144.78 2008-04-29 18:31:54 p02c11o145.mxlogic.net mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S3006A9A DATA=EFILTER0 MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # Here is my glst.conf: rejmsg=451 4.7.1 Delivery of this email has been briefly
[xmail] Re: Glst.conf and gmail
I added what I thought was a good entry for gmail and I am indeed getting mail through but admittedly I didn't test without it (I had read a couple of websites that said that gmail actually didn't use the same MTA but I can't confirm that it's true.) I do see issues with some listservs though. I took glst back out of service last evening when I found that I wasn't getting some key listserv messages. I've read the examples and just need to revisit them I guess to figure out the mnet mask parameters. I'm going to work on that this weekend so I can put glst back into service. Over a 4 hour period last evening we only had 185 inbound messages. After taking out glst we racked up over 2000 in 5 minutes. It's definitely going back in as soon as I teak it as best as I can. Thanks for another great product Davide! Davide Libenzi wrote: On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Dale Qualls wrote: Okay, I got around the mkdep issue with: touch /usr/local/bin/mkdep chmod a+x /usr/local/mkdep I'm about ready to start testing glst but I'm concerned about the mnet info for gmail. I found this on the web but I'm unable to find the mask for the gmail entries. Does anyone have a glst.conf they can share that has mnet entries for the gmail? Reading the docs I need to add the more popular mail systems with mnet entries as the sender IPs change so frequently (even between messages). Don't major email providers already adapted to greylisting, by using the same outgoing MTA for a given message? I can receive emails from yahoo and gmail w/out any entry in my glst.conf file. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Glst.conf and gmail
Okay, I got around the mkdep issue with: touch /usr/local/bin/mkdep chmod a+x /usr/local/mkdep I'm about ready to start testing glst but I'm concerned about the mnet info for gmail. I found this on the web but I'm unable to find the mask for the gmail entries. Does anyone have a glst.conf they can share that has mnet entries for the gmail? Reading the docs I need to add the more popular mail systems with mnet entries as the sender IPs change so frequently (even between messages). Thanks! ** Hi all, I'm trying to configure GLST to accept mails from Gmail. The problem in receiving these mails is that google mail servers send the same message from different IPs, by having the glst unable to recognize the previous key (triplet) in the database., and glst stores *the exact remote IP* that is trying to send the message. GLST provides a solution via mnet option (via command line or configuration file): *QUOTE* The --mnet option gives the ability to apply a transformation on the incoming IP, so that entire subnets can be used as source IP in the stored triplet. the format of the MNET parameter is IP,MASK,NMASK , with the IP and MASK fields that are used to match the incoming IP, and the NMASK field that is applied to the incoming IP to retrieve the address that should be stored inside the database key. For example, supposing a /24 masking should be applied to all incoming IPs, the MNET field should be 0.0.0.0,0.0.0.0,255.255.255.0 . If the entire 10.0.0.0/8 subnet should be masked using a /27 address size, the MNET field should be 10.0.0.0,255.0.0.0,255.255.255.224. I'm currently having problems configuring MASK in IP,MASK,NETMASK triplet. For example, suppose that Google uses the block 209.85.128.0/17 and 64.233.160.0/19 for their smtp, then glst.conf should contain: mnet=209.85.128.0, ? ,255.255.128.0 mnet=64.233.160.0, ? ,255.255.224.0 But, ..how do I obtain the MASK? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] glst compile question
Davide (or anyone) I'm trying to compile the glst executables and keep getting this: vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26 # vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26 # make -f Makefile.unx -bash: vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26: No such file or directory mkdep -f .depend -I. -DUNIX -DLINUX ./glst.c ./dbdump.c ./dbload.c vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26 # Makefile.unx:81: .depend: No such file or directory make: mkdep: Command not found -bash: Makefile.unx:81:: command not found vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26 # mkdep -f .depend -I. -DUNIX -DLINUX ../glst.c ./dbdump.c ./dbload.c make: *** [.depend] Error 127 I've tried this on a couple of different machines (all SLES 10 SP1) and I repeatedly get the same error. I've verified that make is installed. but maybe there is a supporting library that I need to have installed? Any direction would be appreciated. As a side note, are any of you using glst? Thanks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 2-4 hour delay on relays....
Same problem thing this morning. Sent a message, waited 30 minutes and
it's still sitting in the queue, no SLOG file, message was sitting in
the spool just fine. Restart XMail and the message flies on through.
Is there anything strange with my command line? This is happening on
both boxes. Maybe the box is running low on memory? They only have
256MB of RAM and it looks like most of it is being used up (246MB). I'm
going to double the RAM and see if that makes a difference. I bet XMail
is maybe bogging down because it's getting killed by lack of RAM?
mx3:/ # top
top - 09:03:45 up 5 days, 32 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 52 total, 2 running, 50 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.8%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 1.2%si,
0.0%st
Mem:256724k total, 246544k used,10180k free,90496k buffers
Swap: 514040k total, 84k used, 513956k free,95008k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
14314 root 16 0 319m 3748 1584 S 0.3 1.5 0:21.38 XMail
1 root 16 0 720 284 244 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.58 init
2 root 34 19 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.04 ksoftirqd/0
3 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/0
4 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper
5 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
7 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.79 kblockd/0
8 root 20 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
98 root 15 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 2:30.25 pdflush
99 root 15 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.91 pdflush
101 root 20 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
100 root 15 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.52 kswapd0
307 root 11 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/0
308 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
348 root 11 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kpsmoused
720 root 11 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0
809 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 reiserfs/0
Thanks Davide.
Dale Qualls wrote:
I had attempted with the file system before, there just wasn't a slog file.
I followed your directions below but lo and behold the message
transferred immediately.
MX2:/var/MailRoot/spool # grep -R [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
MX2:/var/MailRoot/spool # cd ../logs
MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep -R [EMAIL PROTECTED] smail-20071120*
pmnhg.net 1195567522962.2820438944.1ca30.MX2S99747F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 12:09:01
pmnhg.net 1195590261005.2812046240.2312b.MX2S99D74E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 15:13:36
*pmnhg.net 1195597085232.2837445536.48.MX2 S9A27C9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 16:18:05*
MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs #
So, I tried it again and it still transferred immediately:
pmnhg.net 1195567522962.2820438944.1ca30.MX2S99747F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 12:09:01
pmnhg.net 1195590261005.2812046240.2312b.MX2S99D74E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 15:13:36
pmnhg.net 1195597085232.2837445536.48.MX2 S9A27C9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 16:18:05
*pmnhg.net 1195597442419.2795482016.268.MX2 S9A29F4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 16:24:16*
MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs #
I'll let it run for a bit and try again. Maybe when the spools get
loaded up it gets freaky? I really doubt if that is the case as XMail
runs pretty damned clean and fast. I sometimes have over 30,000
messages in the spool files though after a couple of days of running
(even with clearing the spool with the find command using -delete to
keep it clean)
I'll test again in the morning and get back to you.
Thanks Davide!
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
Strange. I flushed the queue, using Haralds manager, and it shot the
message right through.
Ok, forget the tools. Let's go to the file system. Stop XMail and clean
the spool `find spool/ -type f | xargs rm -f` (if spossible - this will
nuke possible queued messages).
Then send the message and look at the slog file. Just put a special text
mark in your message and:
$ find spool/ -type f -exec grep -H TEXT_MARK {} \;
You should have an associated slog file (same file name, inside the
corresponding slog directory).
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help
[xmail] 2-4 hour delay on relays....
Hello all, I've got a bit of a head scratcher here. I have a couple of XMail boxes setup to do relaying (no filtering of any kind) as backup MX servers and I've never really paid much attention but it appears that they relay received messages about 2-4 hours after it is received. I had someone complain about it recently so I did a bit of testing (and a couple of restarts, even though on a *nix box it shouldn't need it). Dates and times are correct on the servers. I did a telnet session to localhost from this server (MX2) and sent a message to my office account (changed to myofficeacct in the text below) from this account and it really did take 4 hours to get through. Here's the log info: MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp-20071120 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 127.0.0.1 2007-11-20 08:05:07 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] com S99747F RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 127.0.0.1 2007-11-20 08:05:22 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] com S99747F RECV=OK 15 MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] smail-20071120 pmnhg.net 1195567522962.2820438944.1ca30.MX2S99747F [EMAIL PROTECTED] technologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] RLYS 10.5.10.3 2007-11 -20 12:09:01 MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # date Tue Nov 20 12:14:10 CST 2007 I then did a telnet session to MX3 from MX2 and sent a message to my office account (changed to myofficeacct in the text below) from this account and it took 2 hours to get through. Here's the log info: mx3:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] *20071120* smail-20071120:pmnhg.net 1195567409683.2820668320.a46e.mx3 S4F17C3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS 10.5.10.32007-11-20 10:02:57 smtp-20071120:pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 10.5.10.114 2007-11-20 08:03:24 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S4F17C3 RCPT=OK 0 smtp-20071120:pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 10.5.10.114 2007-11-20 08:03:29 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S4F17C3 RECV=OK 14 mx3:/var/MailRoot/logs # date Tue Nov 20 12:33:54 CST 2007 mx3:/var/MailRoot/logs # Here is my command line (on both servers): XMAIL_CMD_LINE=-Pl -Sl -Ql -Qt 10 -Qr 50 -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -SX 100 I've got the Qt set to 10 so after a failure it should retry a send in 10 minutes, correct? All of the l are lower case Ls. Kinda strange. I have to assume it's always done this. Any nuggets of wisdom on what I should look at? Both servers are XMail 1.24 on SLES10.1 thanks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 2-4 hour delay on relays....
I sent the test message at 2:24 p.m. CST and now at 3:19 p.m. CST it still sits in the spool but there is no slog file. I didn't find a corresponding one in the slog directory (although there are many others) and using Haralds xmail queue manager it simply says NO_SLOG_FILE. Shall I bounce the box to see if things begin moving? Davide Libenzi wrote: On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote: Hello all, I've got a bit of a head scratcher here. I have a couple of XMail boxes setup to do relaying (no filtering of any kind) as backup MX servers and I've never really paid much attention but it appears that they relay received messages about 2-4 hours after it is received. I had someone complain about it recently so I did a bit of testing (and a couple of restarts, even though on a *nix box it shouldn't need it). Dates and times are correct on the servers. I did a telnet session to localhost from this server (MX2) and sent a message to my office account (changed to myofficeacct in the text below) from this account and it really did take 4 hours to get through. Here's the log info: MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp-20071120 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 127.0.0.1 2007-11-20 08:05:07 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] com S99747F RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 127.0.0.1 2007-11-20 08:05:22 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] com S99747F RECV=OK 15 MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] smail-20071120 pmnhg.net 1195567522962.2820438944.1ca30.MX2S99747F [EMAIL PROTECTED] technologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] RLYS 10.5.10.3 2007-11 -20 12:09:01 MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # date Tue Nov 20 12:14:10 CST 2007 I then did a telnet session to MX3 from MX2 and sent a message to my office account (changed to myofficeacct in the text below) from this account and it took 2 hours to get through. Here's the log info: mx3:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] *20071120* smail-20071120:pmnhg.net 1195567409683.2820668320.a46e.mx3 S4F17C3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS 10.5.10.32007-11-20 10:02:57 smtp-20071120:pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 10.5.10.114 2007-11-20 08:03:24 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S4F17C3 RCPT=OK 0 smtp-20071120:pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 10.5.10.114 2007-11-20 08:03:29 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S4F17C3 RECV=OK 14 mx3:/var/MailRoot/logs # date Tue Nov 20 12:33:54 CST 2007 mx3:/var/MailRoot/logs # Here is my command line (on both servers): XMAIL_CMD_LINE=-Pl -Sl -Ql -Qt 10 -Qr 50 -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -SX 100 I've got the Qt set to 10 so after a failure it should retry a send in 10 minutes, correct? All of the l are lower case Ls. Kinda strange. I have to assume it's always done this. Any nuggets of wisdom on what I should look at? Both servers are XMail 1.24 on SLES10.1 Try again, but this time after 10-20 minutes, go inside the spool and search for your message. Then post the associated slog file. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 2-4 hour delay on relays....
Strange. I flushed the queue, using Haralds manager, and it shot the message right through. Davide Libenzi wrote: On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote: Hello all, I've got a bit of a head scratcher here. I have a couple of XMail boxes setup to do relaying (no filtering of any kind) as backup MX servers and I've never really paid much attention but it appears that they relay received messages about 2-4 hours after it is received. I had someone complain about it recently so I did a bit of testing (and a couple of restarts, even though on a *nix box it shouldn't need it). Dates and times are correct on the servers. I did a telnet session to localhost from this server (MX2) and sent a message to my office account (changed to myofficeacct in the text below) from this account and it really did take 4 hours to get through. Here's the log info: MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp-20071120 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 127.0.0.1 2007-11-20 08:05:07 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] com S99747F RCPT=OK 0 pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 127.0.0.1 2007-11-20 08:05:22 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] com S99747F RECV=OK 15 MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] smail-20071120 pmnhg.net 1195567522962.2820438944.1ca30.MX2S99747F [EMAIL PROTECTED] technologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] RLYS 10.5.10.3 2007-11 -20 12:09:01 MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # date Tue Nov 20 12:14:10 CST 2007 I then did a telnet session to MX3 from MX2 and sent a message to my office account (changed to myofficeacct in the text below) from this account and it took 2 hours to get through. Here's the log info: mx3:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] *20071120* smail-20071120:pmnhg.net 1195567409683.2820668320.a46e.mx3 S4F17C3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS 10.5.10.32007-11-20 10:02:57 smtp-20071120:pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 10.5.10.114 2007-11-20 08:03:24 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S4F17C3 RCPT=OK 0 smtp-20071120:pmnhg.net pmnhg.net 10.5.10.114 2007-11-20 08:03:29 radtechnologies.net myofficeacct.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S4F17C3 RECV=OK 14 mx3:/var/MailRoot/logs # date Tue Nov 20 12:33:54 CST 2007 mx3:/var/MailRoot/logs # Here is my command line (on both servers): XMAIL_CMD_LINE=-Pl -Sl -Ql -Qt 10 -Qr 50 -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -SX 100 I've got the Qt set to 10 so after a failure it should retry a send in 10 minutes, correct? All of the l are lower case Ls. Kinda strange. I have to assume it's always done this. Any nuggets of wisdom on what I should look at? Both servers are XMail 1.24 on SLES10.1 Try again, but this time after 10-20 minutes, go inside the spool and search for your message. Then post the associated slog file. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 2-4 hour delay on relays....
I had attempted with the file system before, there just wasn't a slog file.
I followed your directions below but lo and behold the message
transferred immediately.
MX2:/var/MailRoot/spool # grep -R [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
MX2:/var/MailRoot/spool # cd ../logs
MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs # grep -R [EMAIL PROTECTED] smail-20071120*
pmnhg.net 1195567522962.2820438944.1ca30.MX2S99747F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 12:09:01
pmnhg.net 1195590261005.2812046240.2312b.MX2S99D74E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 15:13:36
*pmnhg.net 1195597085232.2837445536.48.MX2 S9A27C9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 16:18:05*
MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs #
So, I tried it again and it still transferred immediately:
pmnhg.net 1195567522962.2820438944.1ca30.MX2S99747F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 12:09:01
pmnhg.net 1195590261005.2812046240.2312b.MX2S99D74E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 15:13:36
pmnhg.net 1195597085232.2837445536.48.MX2 S9A27C9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 16:18:05
*pmnhg.net 1195597442419.2795482016.268.MX2 S9A29F4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]RLYS
10.5.10.3 2007-11-20 16:24:16*
MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs #
I'll let it run for a bit and try again. Maybe when the spools get
loaded up it gets freaky? I really doubt if that is the case as XMail
runs pretty damned clean and fast. I sometimes have over 30,000
messages in the spool files though after a couple of days of running
(even with clearing the spool with the find command using -delete to
keep it clean)
I'll test again in the morning and get back to you.
Thanks Davide!
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
Strange. I flushed the queue, using Haralds manager, and it shot the
message right through.
Ok, forget the tools. Let's go to the file system. Stop XMail and clean
the spool `find spool/ -type f | xargs rm -f` (if spossible - this will
nuke possible queued messages).
Then send the message and look at the slog file. Just put a special text
mark in your message and:
$ find spool/ -type f -exec grep -H TEXT_MARK {} \;
You should have an associated slog file (same file name, inside the
corresponding slog directory).
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XMail resends old emails after reboot.
As my spool gets inundated with junk, I run this command every day at 11:30 p.m. via a cron job. find /var/MailRoot/spool -depth -name *.MX2 -ctime 1 -delete MX2 is the name of one of my xmail boxes so all files in the spool have it appended to the end of the filename by default. Works like a charm :) This actually looks at the current day plus 1 day so you'll always have files 2+ (but less than 3) days old in your spool. Checkout the man page on find to see the options for times (minutes, hours, etc...) Davide Libenzi wrote: On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Chad Fleenor wrote: has anyone else had a problem with Xmail resending old emails (months old) after a system reboot?? You call a filter. Filter timeouts. XMail tries to remove the spool file, and fails. File remains inside the spool (but not in the in-memory queue). Next time you restart XMail, it'll be picked up. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XMail resends old emails after reboot.
My xmail servers are only pass through boxes for redundancy and virus scanning (and yes, my retry is 1 day so having a 2 day purge is perfect in my scenario). The only things that ever stay in my spool are ndr's back to spammers. Thanks! Davide Libenzi wrote: On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Dale Qualls wrote: As my spool gets inundated with junk, I run this command every day at 11:30 p.m. via a cron job. find /var/MailRoot/spool -depth -name *.MX2 -ctime 1 -delete MX2 is the name of one of my xmail boxes so all files in the spool have it appended to the end of the filename by default. Works like a charm :) This actually looks at the current day plus 1 day so you'll always have files 2+ (but less than 3) days old in your spool. Checkout the man page on find to see the options for times (minutes, hours, etc...) This is rather wrong though, if your total spool message age can be longer than one day. To be safe, just use 2*T where T is the total time a message can live inside the spool (depends on the re-send policy params). - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Is GLST still being developed?
Ahhh, the mnets thing might be an issue. We get many messages from big virtual servers such as that... It could be an issue if messages get dropped due to that. Thanks for the info, it is much appreciated! TheOldFellow wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:05:04 -0500 Dale Qualls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are you using for timing settings for unknown triplets? I'm considering 10 minutes for the --time0 parameter. What rejerr are you using? I just use the defaults provided by Davide. My experience with XMail over the years is that Davide understands mail much better than I do. Indeed much of my understanding today is based on working out why XMail works so well. I used to be a 150 a day man (SPAM, that it), but it's down to a couple a week. I had to add my network as an xnet, and some mnets to allow gmail etc. to reach me, and I guess there could be some better defaults there, or at least a recommendation (maybe there is, but I didn't find it). With the mnets, either you go looking for big virtual servers, or wait until something you are expecting doesn't show up ;-( Good luck with it, R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Is GLST still being developed?
Davide: Freshmeat.net shows no activity for 19 months, is it a mature product that needs no development (based on the functionality)? Anyone using it? I'm seriously considering it (or maia, something to GL). Thx! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Is GLST still being developed?
Davide: Please don't assume that I thought it was dead. I was merely asking about it as there hasn't been any changes for a long time. My statement about it being a mature product should have shown that. I'm guessing that once you write something like this it doesn't really need any further development (do you really need to change code that does a set process against a set item, such as an e-mail file that shouldn't change in structure?) unless it's simply to take advantage of additional features of new underlying systems (such as a new version of Xmail). I didn't mean to offend, I was simply wondering if it was beyond needing anything done, again, based on the functionality of what it does and if anyone was using it so that I could get some real world information regarding it. My apologies. Davide Libenzi wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Dale Qualls wrote: Davide: Freshmeat.net shows no activity for 19 months, is it a mature product that needs no development (based on the functionality)? When do ppl start to realize that no new development does not mean the software is dead? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Is GLST still being developed?
What are you using for timing settings for unknown triplets? I'm considering 10 minutes for the --time0 parameter. What rejerr are you using? I'm glad to hear you're using it. I'm heavily contemplating it. Thanks!! TheOldFellow wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:40:00 -0500 Dale Qualls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Davide: Freshmeat.net shows no activity for 19 months, is it a mature product that needs no development (based on the functionality)? Anyone using it? I'm seriously considering it (or maia, something to GL). I'm using it. It's fantastic. I don't know if Davide is developing it further. R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Drop NDRs?
Actually, no, I don't need to know as it could never happen to be a mis-type. These are secondary MX servers that ONLY receive mail and relay to our primary server, they're never used for sending mail, they exist only as backup incoming servers. So, the only messages that are created are response messages back to the originator of an undeliverable (99.999% of the time this will be a spammer), which is fine but then when a NDR is received back (in response of my sending a NDR to a non-existent spammer sending account) I don't want to see it/deal with it. So, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends me a message and my server received it it is for a person not on my mail system, my system sends back a NDR to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, typically [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't truly exist so the receiving domain (if it exists) sends back a NDR to the postmaster account which in reality I don't care to see. I'm hoping that I'm explaining it correctly, it's kind of confusing I guess. Davide Libenzi wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Dale Qualls wrote: But is there anyway to dump them? What if I (against the RFC) get rid of the postmaster account, will they just get dropped and not fill up the spool? If you made a mistake typing and address, you probably want to know about it, don't you? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Drop NDRs?
Thanks for the reply, it sounds like both would be good options. I too am interested to see if anyone else has done this and can offer any guidance. Cripes, my spool has so many messages that Harald's XQMWIN can't seem to load them all and just hangs. I hate to simply clear the spool for fear that something important might get dropped. Thank you Vinny Wadding wrote: This would be something that I would like to be able to do as well, as at times we can bet a mass of dictionary mails sent to us. There are two ways I can think to do this: 1) Possibly edit the SMAILProcessFile (I think thats where it gets processed) function in SMAILSvr.cpp and make that drop the file? But I am not sure if this is the best approach, this would require help from someone that has a much better understanding of the source? 2) I think this should also be achievable by putting a filter on the domains to control in this fashion. I have never used the filters option in xmail and am unsure where would be best to put the filter, as there are many possible places in the delivery chain it can go. Option 1 would be the fastest as it would be compiled, but option 2 would be easier to implement. Is this something that anyone else out there has done before? Dale Qualls wrote: I've got an xmail box acting as a secondary MX and a custdomain simply re-directing the mail to our primary MX. Whenever there is a non-deliverable (dictionary attack), the secondary sends an NDR to the spammer address and then has to accept a NDR back when the receiving spoofed server sends it. Is there a way to drop the NDRs when they come back? Also, my spool is loaded with messages that xmail keeps trying to deliver to obviously bad addresses. I don't want to set a low timeout threshold in case the primary MX is down for an extended period of time as this would cause legitimate messages to get dumped. Any thoughts?? TIA! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Drop NDRs?
Hmmm, I'm running 1.23. Francesco Vertova wrote: At 23.43 05/03/07, you wrote: Also, my spool is loaded with messages that xmail keeps trying to deliver to obviously bad addresses. This has been mostly cured with XMail = 1.23. Which version are you running? Ciao, Francesco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Drop NDRs?
But is there anyway to dump them? What if I (against the RFC) get rid of the postmaster account, will they just get dropped and not fill up the spool? Davide Libenzi wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Dale Qualls wrote: I've got an xmail box acting as a secondary MX and a custdomain simply re-directing the mail to our primary MX. Whenever there is a non-deliverable (dictionary attack), the secondary sends an NDR to the spammer address and then has to accept a NDR back when the receiving spoofed server sends it. Is there a way to drop the NDRs when they come back? Also, my spool is loaded with messages that xmail keeps trying to deliver to obviously bad addresses. I don't want to set a low timeout threshold in case the primary MX is down for an extended period of time as this would cause legitimate messages to get dumped. Any thoughts?? From XMail 1.23 ahead, if the target domain does not exist, you get a bounce immediately. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Drop NDRs?
I've got an xmail box acting as a secondary MX and a custdomain simply re-directing the mail to our primary MX. Whenever there is a non-deliverable (dictionary attack), the secondary sends an NDR to the spammer address and then has to accept a NDR back when the receiving spoofed server sends it. Is there a way to drop the NDRs when they come back? Also, my spool is loaded with messages that xmail keeps trying to deliver to obviously bad addresses. I don't want to set a low timeout threshold in case the primary MX is down for an extended period of time as this would cause legitimate messages to get dumped. Any thoughts?? TIA! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: ClamAV usage with XMail
I use both ClamAV and F-Prot, every message gets scanned twice. Brian wrote: Any opinions on using ClamAV with XMail? How good is ClamAV and is it secure / stable? Jason - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Webmin Module
Darn. Okay, thanks! -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, March 29, 2006, 12:37:10 AM, you wrote: Hello, Is there a webmin module for xmail? I've done some searching and haven't come across one but I can't believe that it doesn't already exist... I've searched a couple of time as well and I did'nt find any. I suppose Aaron Johnson's work would help a lot to make one: http://www.gina.net/solution/XMail.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Webmin Module
Is there a webmin module for xmail? I've done some searching and haven't come across one but I can't believe that it doesn't already exist... TIA! -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] XMail on FC4
Any horror stories about running xmail on FC4? I've given up on running it on Open Suse 10, it just doesn't like the hardware I guess (it's a strong running Dell but OpenSuse just drags on it. Stopping xmail takes forever, and eventually the processes are stopped but the /etc/init.d/xmail stop command never finishes, this along with other issues including my filter error -97 woes Never had an issue like this on our RH8 box so I guess sticking with RH in some form is the way to go. We're either going to go with the FC4 or just rebuild the box on RH8 with larger drives. Might have to just stick with RH8 since we know it works pretty darned good. Thx! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XMail on FC4
Hmmm. On this box it starts up fine but doesn't stop easily. It is an Intel chip. Also, for some reason it's very sluggish. Running in debug mode showed approximately 8-10 seconds to connect via POP3 and SMTP from the client (and both were on a 100mb switch with nobody else on). -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunday, March 12, 2006, 8:13:34 AM, you wrote: On Sunday 12 March 2006 08:02, Dale Qualls wrote: Any horror stories about running xmail on FC4? I've given up on running it on Open Suse 10, it just doesn't like the hardware I guess (it's a strong running Dell but OpenSuse just drags on it. Stopping xmail takes forever, and eventually the processes are stopped but the /etc/init.d/xmail stop command never finishes, this along with other issues including my filter error -97 woes I've had XMail running on openSUSE 10 for a couple months now and haven't had any of those issues, but I have a very low volume server. Maybe XMail prefers AMD chips... ;-) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XMail on FC4
Hiya! Trust me, I'm not blaming xmail, I'm blaming the OpenSuse. xmail runs beautifully on everything I've had it on (RH and Mandrake). No disrespect meant towards the xmail product or you Davide. -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunday, March 12, 2006, 10:52:17 AM, you wrote: On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Dale Qualls wrote: Any horror stories about running xmail on FC4? I've given up on running it on Open Suse 10, it just doesn't like the hardware I guess (it's a strong running Dell but OpenSuse just drags on it. Stopping xmail takes forever, and eventually the processes are stopped but the /etc/init.d/xmail stop command never finishes, this along with other issues including my filter error -97 woes Uh? XMail does not care at all and runs everywhere there's a SuS POSIX subsystem. Delays in the XMail stop procedure are very likely related to a slow DNS name/IP resolution. You can modify the xmail script to issue a kill after waiting for 8-10 seconds. Wait, error -97 is related to filter execution errors or segfaults, so you might want to look into that before blaming XMail ;) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Filter error -97
Hiya! Nope, I used that but didn't see diddly. I am going to look at the var/log/mail log when I can though, that should show me if the spamassassin daemon is responding, I didn't think to do that at the time. I'm thinking that the -97 may be a timeout but I'm not positive. I already have QT 600 on the command line. Thanks Sonke! -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 2:53:19 AM, you wrote: On 06.03.2006 14:56, Dale Qualls wrote: All I could find on the 'net had to do with possible timeout erros (apparently this is what the -97 means). spamd is running but it almost seems like SA isn't answering when it's called by the filter. Any thoughts off the top of your heads? Maybe XMail debug mode will tell you something more? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Filter error -97
Hiya! Yes. Actually, I installed xmail then copied my backup over the top of the fresh install so that all of my pathing and executables would be in the exact same place (/var/MailRoot). Dang. -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 9:53:05 AM, you wrote: On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Dale Qualls wrote: Well, we attempted to replace our mailserver this weekend but had to revert back to the older one due to a filter issue that didn't make much sense to me. Original setup: RH8 XMail 1.22 f-prot (using a modified clamav filter) SA 3.0.2 (using bsa_filter which is a version of Don's sa_filter that was modified by Beau Cox) Everything runs fine on this config. I built a new Suse 10 box, installed xMail 1.22 on it then moved over my /var/MailRoot folder from the old box. This box is running SA 3.0.4 instead of 3.0.2 and I now receive filter errors on the bsa_filter. It also doesn't appear that xMail starts up all 20 of its threads. pstree -p only shows a single xMail entry (but it does show the 5 spamd threads). All I could find on the 'net had to do with possible timeout erros (apparently this is what the -97 means). spamd is running but it almost seems like SA isn't answering when it's called by the filter. Any thoughts off the top of your heads? I can't easily test it as we didnt' have a replacement server (we just yanked the original drive and put this a new one in for the install so we could easily fall back in case of a failure such as this). For grins I was going to bump up the SA version on the RH box to 3.0.4 to see if it caused the same problems but figured I'd post a quick question first. The error -97 is ERR_FORK. It means you there are too many running processes, or the system was unable to exec your filter. Did you specify the full path to the filter binary? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Filter error -97
Hiya! Well, we attempted to replace our mailserver this weekend but had to revert back to the older one due to a filter issue that didn't make much sense to me. Original setup: RH8 XMail 1.22 f-prot (using a modified clamav filter) SA 3.0.2 (using bsa_filter which is a version of Don's sa_filter that was modified by Beau Cox) Everything runs fine on this config. I built a new Suse 10 box, installed xMail 1.22 on it then moved over my /var/MailRoot folder from the old box. This box is running SA 3.0.4 instead of 3.0.2 and I now receive filter errors on the bsa_filter. It also doesn't appear that xMail starts up all 20 of its threads. pstree -p only shows a single xMail entry (but it does show the 5 spamd threads). All I could find on the 'net had to do with possible timeout erros (apparently this is what the -97 means). spamd is running but it almost seems like SA isn't answering when it's called by the filter. Any thoughts off the top of your heads? I can't easily test it as we didnt' have a replacement server (we just yanked the original drive and put this a new one in for the install so we could easily fall back in case of a failure such as this). For grins I was going to bump up the SA version on the RH box to 3.0.4 to see if it caused the same problems but figured I'd post a quick question first. TIA -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: imap
Yet. :) Monday, January 23, 2006, 9:45:32 PM, you wrote: XMail doesn't support IMAP. - Original Message - From: Erwin Meulensteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: [xmail] imap Hello, can anyone tell me how to setup imap on a windows server using xmail ? Any help would be appreciated. All the best, Erwin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CLAMAV is the culprit... WAS Sending to multiple recipients
Hiya! Thanks, I'll give it a shot. I too used it for a very long time without issues, then this just sprung up, I blame it on the AV, not the filter. Have a great holiday! -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 6:08:49 PM, you wrote: I've been using clamav for some time now and haven't had a problem with it that I know of. I use my own filter for it. If you want to give it a shot, see: http://www.webifi.com/xmail/xmclam.tar.gz --John Dale Qualls wrote: Thanks Davide and Don for the help. I had previously remmed out the lines in filters.in.tab but it didn't help solve the problem. Removing the filters.in.tab completely (emptying it) allowed it to function properly. #'ing the lines out didn't work. I took out each of my filters 1 at a time and it apparently was the av-filter.tab hosing us. This is the filter written by Pete Lindemann and it's using CLAMAV. I've taken the same filter (a while back) and modified it to use different strings so it could co-exist and I use it as f-prot.tab. This gives us 2 different scanners. So, apparently clamav is to blame. We running the latest version of clamav and it's fully up to date. Anyone else seeing any clamav issues??? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CLAMAV is the culprit... WAS Sending to multiple recipients
Hiya! clamscan I've never used post-data filters, does a standard filter work in the filters.postdata.tab?? It looks like the files have the same structure from what I see in the docs. Pardon my ignorance here, guess I should have paid attention to all of those post/pre data filter threads :) -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 8:25:04 AM, you wrote: Hey Dale, One problem with filtering in filters.in.tab, is that you'll end up scanning the message once for every recipient on the list... so you could end up scanning the same message a number of times over. I prefer to do it in a post-data filter, allowing the message to be scanned once, and allowing a rejection message to be issued to the MTA via a 5xx error, without the worry of sending spam to a forged address. One question: Were you using clamscan or clamdscan? --John Dale Qualls wrote: Hiya! Thanks, I'll give it a shot. I too used it for a very long time without issues, then this just sprung up, I blame it on the AV, not the filter. Have a great holiday! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CLAMAV is the culprit... WAS Sending to multiple recipients
Thanks for the info, I'll check out the clamdscan and see how it works
for us (I prefer to have 2 levels of av scanning).
Have a great holiday!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 1:38:26 PM, you wrote:
They should be near the same, however, I don't know if the spool files
accessible via normal mail filters
(filters.in.tab/filters.out.tab) have
the {ra=real-address} info on the RCPT TO: line like you get with smtp
message filters. They may, but I honestly haven't used them much since
Davide implemented smtp filters.
The few things you need to keep in mind; exit codes that your filter
will return will be different from message filters to smtp message
filters, and many of the macros available in message filters aren't in
smtp message filters. It's also important to note that smtp filters are
running real time.. that is, during the smtp communication with MTAs, so
they need to be quick. In short: No, most standard filters won't work
well as an smtp filter without modification.
Now, about clamscan. Unfortunately, clamscan is _much_ slower than
clamdscan. Because of this, I wonder if, when receiving a shed load of
messages to filter all at once when you have a large cc list, the filter
would time out, somehow leaving things in a state that let Xmail decide
to dump or not deliver the message.
So, my first suggestion would be to get clamd and clamdscan up and running.
--John
Dale Qualls wrote:
Hiya!
clamscan
I've never used post-data filters, does a standard filter work in the
filters.postdata.tab?? It looks like the files have the same
structure from what I see in the docs.
Pardon my ignorance here, guess I should have paid attention to all of
those post/pre data filter threads :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients
Sorry 'bout that Don, I couldn't resist. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /var/MailRoot [EMAIL PROTECTED] MailRoot]# cat filters.in.tab * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 av-filter.tab * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 fprot.tab * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 bsa_filter.tab [EMAIL PROTECTED] MailRoot]# cat filters.out.tab # * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 av-filter.tab I've tried commenting out all of them with no change (see my original post). I'll try actually renaming these and replacing them with empty files and see if that makes a difference. -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunday, December 11, 2005, 2:16:19 PM, you wrote: Dale, low blow for the Sox comment... I'm waiting for next year. What are the contents of your filters.in.tab and filters.out.tab? -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale Qualls Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 3:27 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients Hi Don, how 'bout those Sox :) Sorry, couldn't resist jabbing such a diehard Cubs fan (I like 'em both :) It's not set (so it should default to 100, right?). XMAIL_CMD_LINE=-Qt 600 -Qi 0 -Qr 672 -Ql -Pl -Mr 720 -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ll Any suggestions on tweaking these? It's strange too, the number of messages delivered isn't always the same. Thanks for looking at this! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients
Hiya! I'll try replacing the files with empty files and see if that makes a difference. I had commented the filters out before with no change. -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunday, December 11, 2005, 2:26:30 PM, you wrote: On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, Dale Qualls wrote: Hiya! Thanks, it's whacked, isn't it? I'd suggest to remove all the filters you have in the path. Really, I mean. I tried sending multiple blasts of 1000 messages as multi-recipient, and all got home safely. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CLAMAV is the culprit... WAS Sending to multiple recipients
Thanks Davide and Don for the help. I had previously remmed out the lines in filters.in.tab but it didn't help solve the problem. Removing the filters.in.tab completely (emptying it) allowed it to function properly. #'ing the lines out didn't work. I took out each of my filters 1 at a time and it apparently was the av-filter.tab hosing us. This is the filter written by Pete Lindemann and it's using CLAMAV. I've taken the same filter (a while back) and modified it to use different strings so it could co-exist and I use it as f-prot.tab. This gives us 2 different scanners. So, apparently clamav is to blame. We running the latest version of clamav and it's fully up to date. Anyone else seeing any clamav issues??? -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunday, December 11, 2005, 5:04:58 PM, you wrote: Hiya! I'll try replacing the files with empty files and see if that makes a difference. I had commented the filters out before with no change. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients
/12/2005 20:29 No redeliveries 7 of twenty were delivered S7F744[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 20:42 S7F744[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 20:42 S7F744[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 20:42 S7F744[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 20:42 S7F744[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 20:42 S7F744[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 20:42 S7F744[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 20:42 No redeliveries 10 of twenty were delivered S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 S7F74F[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:15 No redeliveries 9 of twenty were delivered S7F750[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:25 S7F750[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:24 S7F750[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:24 S7F750[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:24 S7F750[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:24 S7F750[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:24 S7F750[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:25 S7F750[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:24 S7F750[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/12/2005 21:24 No redeliveries -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale Qualls Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 2:32 AM To: CLEMENT Francis Subject: [xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients Hiya! smtp does show all addresses, and funny, it always shows the last address as being sent twice. smail does NOT show all addresses on incoming messages. I've attached snippets of the logs to this message in case anyone (Davide) would care to peruse them. Thanks for the reply!! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients
Hiya! Nope, it's not running. Thanks for the reply!! -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, December 8, 2005, 4:01:50 AM, you wrote: Dale Qualls wrote: Hi gang: My brother posted this question a while ago and we're still searching for a solution. We've been using xmail since 1.17 and never really noticed this issue until recently. Setup: XMail 1.22 (this also occured with 1.21 and 1.20, not sure about before 1.20) HP 2.6Ghz 512MB Ram RH 8.0 Pete's AV filter SA filter No outbound filters Here's the issue: When users on the xmail server send messages to multiple recipients all of them are never delivered. If a message is inbound to many accounts they do not all receive it. The messages that make it through are delivered sporadically to the users, if the same message is sent several times different users will actually receive it. Sending messages out has the same effect, they are not all received and if the same message is sent repeatedly the boxes that do receive the messages differs every time. I tested this by setting up 20 boxes on the xmail server and testing between the xmail server and itself and between the xmail server and a GroupWise server. In sending/receiving on the xmail server I used 2 separate e-mail clients, The Bat! and Mozilla Thunderbird (in prior tests we also tried outlook express with the same results). I tried this with the inbound filters (spam and av) turned off as well and the results were the same. The results were always different as far as who the messages were delivered to but in every case the messages weren't delivered to everyone. The logs do not appear to give any clues. Suggestions? Troubleshooting tips? This is killing my brothers office. Is there any possibility that it could be the OS? I was thinking about taking this box up to SUSE 9.3 or OpenSuse 10, anyone have any experience with these flavors? Thanks! Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm using Xmail on Linux for a long time now (some years) with no problems. (Mandrake for some time, now Fedora) Do you have sendmail service runing? Disable it. P.Katsoulis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients
Hiya! smtp does show all addresses, and funny, it always shows the last address as being sent twice. smail does NOT show all addresses on incoming messages. I've attached snippets of the logs to this message in case anyone (Davide) would care to peruse them. Thanks for the reply!! -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, December 8, 2005, 1:55:09 AM, you wrote: -Message d'origine- De : Dale Qualls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy=E9 : jeudi 8 d=E9cembre 2005 05:07 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Sending to multiple recipients =20 .. .. .. =20 The logs do not appear to give any clues. =20 For incoming smtp connexions does xmail smtp log show the connexion and = all rcpt addresses ? For outgoing smtp connexions does xmail smail log show the connexion = and all rcpt addresses ? Francis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -- File: smtp.txt fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:54 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:55 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:56 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:56 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:56 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:56 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:56 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org fvgsc.org 67.163.92.246 2005-12-07 19:07:56 [192.168.3.20]radtechnologies.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S7F6FDRCPT=OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 fvgsc.org
[xmail] Re: SMTP-Relaying only from Authorized Destinations?
Tracy: You might want to upgrade to 1.22, IIRC there was some kind of obscure security bug fix in 1.22 that was supposedly exploitable in 1.21. -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 8:44:39 PM, you wrote: I ended up going in and custom coding a bunch of stuff in SMTPSvr.c and SMTPUtils.c to make that happen back around 1.17 (and carried the mods forward to the most recent version I've installed, which I think is 1.21). Of course, there were some other mods, too (such as adding user policy level checking, so that users with different policy levels receive a temp fail at RCPT TO)... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients
Hi Don, how 'bout those Sox :) Sorry, couldn't resist jabbing such a diehard Cubs fan (I like 'em both :) It's not set (so it should default to 100, right?). XMAIL_CMD_LINE=-Qt 600 -Qi 0 -Qr 672 -Ql -Pl -Mr 720 -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ll Any suggestions on tweaking these? It's strange too, the number of messages delivered isn't always the same. Thanks for looking at this! -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, December 8, 2005, 9:46:15 AM, you wrote: What is the following command-line option (-Sr) set to when you start XMail? -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale Qualls Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 9:32 AM To: CLEMENT Francis Subject: [xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients Hiya! smtp does show all addresses, and funny, it always shows the last address as being sent twice. smail does NOT show all addresses on incoming messages. I've attached snippets of the logs to this message in case anyone (Davide) would care to peruse them. Thanks for the reply!! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sending to multiple recipients
Hiya!
Well, it was a good thought, but no dice, it's still happening.
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 3:41:18 PM, you wrote:
On 08.12.2005 05:07, Dale Qualls wrote:
My brother posted this question a while ago and we're still searching
for a solution. We've been using xmail since 1.17 and never really
noticed this issue until recently.
Please try deleting everything from the que:
# cd spool
# find -type f -exec rm -f {} \;
Backup the que first. I had some cases where evil messages were around
and XMail got stucked.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Sending to multiple recipients
Hi gang: My brother posted this question a while ago and we're still searching for a solution. We've been using xmail since 1.17 and never really noticed this issue until recently. Setup: XMail 1.22 (this also occured with 1.21 and 1.20, not sure about before 1.20) HP 2.6Ghz 512MB Ram RH 8.0 Pete's AV filter SA filter No outbound filters Here's the issue: When users on the xmail server send messages to multiple recipients all of them are never delivered. If a message is inbound to many accounts they do not all receive it. The messages that make it through are delivered sporadically to the users, if the same message is sent several times different users will actually receive it. Sending messages out has the same effect, they are not all received and if the same message is sent repeatedly the boxes that do receive the messages differs every time. I tested this by setting up 20 boxes on the xmail server and testing between the xmail server and itself and between the xmail server and a GroupWise server. In sending/receiving on the xmail server I used 2 separate e-mail clients, The Bat! and Mozilla Thunderbird (in prior tests we also tried outlook express with the same results). I tried this with the inbound filters (spam and av) turned off as well and the results were the same. The results were always different as far as who the messages were delivered to but in every case the messages weren't delivered to everyone. The logs do not appear to give any clues. Suggestions? Troubleshooting tips? This is killing my brothers office. Is there any possibility that it could be the OS? I was thinking about taking this box up to SUSE 9.3 or OpenSuse 10, anyone have any experience with these flavors? Thanks! Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sending mail through my ISP
Hiya! Since the docs show cram-md5 in lower case I'd suggest doing it exactly as Francis suggested: cram-md5[tab]foo[tab]foobar -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:47:51 AM, you wrote: CLEMENT Francis wrote: The simple is DefaultSMTPGateways ... The related xmail doc part for outgoing smtp auth is 'SMTP CLIENT AUTHENTICATION' (http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#smtp_client_authentication) So, if I don't make mistakes (Davide correct me if I'm wrong...), here is a example : Suppose the isp smtp server to use systematicaly for outgoing mail from your xmail server is named 'smtp.myisp.com' - First set DefaultSMTPGateways to 'smtp.myisp.com' in server.tab : DefaultSMTPGateways[tab]smtp.myisp.com - Second, create a file names 'smtp.myisp.com.tab' in your xmailroot/userauth/smtp structure - Then in this file, depending of the isp authentication method needed, use one (and only one) of the following lines : plain[tab]username_to_use[tab]password_to_use login[tab]username_to_use[tab]password_to_use cram-md5[tab]username_to_use[tab]password_to_use Bye Francis If the AUTH type is CRAM-MD5 what would the corresponding username and password be? If my username is foo and password foobar would I use following line: CRAM-MD5[tab]foo[tab]foobar Thanks, Lac - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Emergency 1.22 due to possible buffer overflow vulnerability ...
Hiya! So I'm assuming (forgive my ignorance, I haven't been following the list for a while) 1.22 has been deemed solid? Thanks for the quick response Davide!!! -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, October 14, 2005, 2:33:24 AM, you wrote: Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Thursday, October 13, 2005 12:00 AM: PS: Mitre has assigned CAN-2005-2943 to this issue. Now public. http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=321type=vulnerabilities -- Regards, Alexander Hagenah - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Emergency 1.22 due to possible buffer overflow vulnerability ...
Hiya! Thanks Sonke! -- later, Dale mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, October 14, 2005, 9:42:28 AM, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, October 14, 2005 3:29 PM: So I'm assuming (forgive my ignorance, I haven't been following the list for a while) 1.22 has been deemed solid? It's up and running here without any problems on several Linux servers since release... Nice weekend. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Generic question
Standard ports: SMTP 25 POP 110 If you'll be doing any management I think it uses telnet on port 6017 for CTRL. If you use the XQMWIN (xmail queue manager which if you're not using you should be), the default is 8000 but is configurable. You could not open up 6017 and use the CTRL via an ssh connection instead for security. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/15/2005 11:06 AM Hello people, OK, I know this is going to sound a bit weird but I need to know if I am missing something. What are the ports used for an xmail box running mail for a LAN to the outside world ? Say, from inside to the outside ? SMTP ? POP3 ? Anything else ? Any strange connection xmail needs to do ? Thank you in advance, Spyros Tsiolis - I merely function as a channel that filters music through the chaos of noise - Vangelis _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] SUSE Pro 9.3
Anyone running 1.21 (or any flavor I guess) on Suse Pro 9.3? Any gotchas (as in the RH8 v RH9 gotchas)? thx! ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: SUSE Pro 9.3
I'm hoping not :) I just remember the RH8 v RH9 gotcha that requied a tweak (albeit a very minor tweak). Thx! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/5/2005 3:35:07 PM On 05.07.2005 21:57, Dale Qualls wrote: Anyone running 1.21 (or any flavor I guess) on Suse Pro 9.3? Any gotchas (as in the RH8 v RH9 gotchas)? XMail runs here with any glibc 2.3 Version on Fedora Core 2-4. So I don't think there are any issues on this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] F-Prot?
Long time no post (all has been running great, knock on wood). Is anyone using FSI's f-prot along with Pete Lindemann's (sp?) av filter? Are you happy with it? Are you using a workstation or server version and does it really matter which you use? Any/all information is welcome. Thanks! ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: F-Prot?
Great, thanks! friggstadk@ironsolutions.com 6/28/2005 10:19 AM Hi Dale: We've been using the workstation version of f-prot along with Peter Lindeman's AV filter for quite some time now (looks like since late 2003), and I haven't had any major problems with it (I seem to remember running into some sort of bug in v1.8 of the filter, but Peter was quite responsive and helpful in tracking it down and solving it - sorry, don't remember any further details on it other than I got a version of 1.9-pre before the official 1.9 release). Anyhow, we've been pretty happy with it. Let me know if you have more questions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale Qualls Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 7:46 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] F-Prot? Long time no post (all has been running great, knock on wood). Is anyone using FSI's f-prot along with Pete Lindemann's (sp?) av filter? Are you happy with it? Are you using a workstation or server version and does it really matter which you use? Any/all information is welcome. Thanks! ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Any good WebMail solutions?
Ditto, I like Uebimiau as well. My only issue with Uebimiau is that if there is more than 10MB in the mailbox you can't view a message - I know this has to be a config setting somewhere but I never could find the darned thing. Anybody know where I can tweak that setting?? Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/3/2005 9:00:31 AM I have been using Uebimiau for a year or so and it runs well - no IMAP, though. It is PHP so it should be fine under Windows. Jeff null wrote: Greetings all, I was able to resolve my earlier issue with connection/ management. So, I am wondering what WebMail solutions anyone would recommend. I'm initially providing POP3. IMAP will be down the road. So if anyone could make a/ some suggestion(s). I'd be *very* greatful. The only one I see mentioned on the home page is nullwebmail. Won't work on my Windows 2k advanced server box. Thanks for all your time and consideration in this matter. --Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Any good WebMail solutions?
Cool, thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/3/2005 9:22:11 AM I think that can be fiound in /inc/config.php $quota_limit= xxx Jeff Dale Qualls wrote: Ditto, I like Uebimiau as well. My only issue with Uebimiau is that if there is more than 10MB in the mailbox you can't view a message - I know this has to be a config setting somewhere but I never could find the darned thing. Anybody know where I can tweak that setting?? Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/3/2005 9:00:31 AM I have been using Uebimiau for a year or so and it runs well - no IMAP, though. It is PHP so it should be fine under Windows. Jeff null wrote: Greetings all, I was able to resolve my earlier issue with connection/ management. So, I am wondering what WebMail solutions anyone would recommend. I'm initially providing POP3. IMAP will be down the road. So if anyone could make a/ some suggestion(s). I'd be *very* greatful. The only one I see mentioned on the home page is nullwebmail. Won't work on my Windows 2k advanced server box. Thanks for all your time and consideration in this matter. --Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] GDM interferes with Xmail?
Okay, here's a strange one that doesn't make sense to me. RH8.0, XMail 1.21, ClamAV, Pete's AV filter, SA3.02, modified SA filter. Changing inittab runlevel to 3 from 5 to save resources from X starting up hoses the box (default font not found errors). Changing GDM startup in the gui from graphical greeter to standard greeter for both local and remote has the exact same effect (changing the inittab back or replacing the /etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf with a backup corrects it). During this time XMail will NOT receive any mail (either internal or external). SMTP is running and I can telnet to it but nothing is received. I can, however, send e-mails externally (internally are never received). Restoring the backup gdm.conf file and/or changing the inittab and rebooting the server corrects the issue though. Is XMail dependent on GDM somehow? I'm going to have to scrap the box and rebuild to get rid of the graphical startup, nothing I've tried will allow it to be disabled without causing me all of this grief, what a pain in the neck :) Thanks! ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] smtp log not rolling
Okay, question #2. The SMTP log isn't rolling/rotating. All of the other logs are fine. The SMTP log has been gathering data since January 27th. Here's the CMD_LINE from /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail (and yes, the l characters are lower case Ls): XMAIL_CMD_LINE=-Qt 600 -Qi 0 -Qr 672 -Ql -Pl -Mr 720 -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ll Any ideas on this one? Thanks again!! ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: GDM interferes with Xmail?
I'll check 'em out, thanks Soenke! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/14/2005 1:14:43 PM On Monday, February 14, 2005 7:25 PM [GMT+1=CET], Dale Qualls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, here's a strange one that doesn't make sense to me. RH8.0, XMail 1.21, ClamAV, Pete's AV filter, SA3.02, modified SA filter. Changing inittab runlevel to 3 from 5 to save resources from X starting up hoses the box (default font not found errors). Changing GDM startup in the gui from graphical greeter to standard greeter for both local and remote has the exact same effect (changing the inittab back or replacing the /etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf with a backup corrects it). During this time XMail will NOT receive any mail (either internal or external). SMTP is running and I can telnet to it but nothing is received. I can, however, send e-mails externally (internally are never received). Restoring the backup gdm.conf file and/or changing the inittab and rebooting the server corrects the issue though. Is XMail dependent on GDM somehow? Mhm XMail works here without any GUI :) Maybe XMail gots killed in runlevel 5? Check your rc.d S?? and K?? links. Imho it has something to do with the start and kill links ... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: GDM interferes with Xmail?
I'll give it a shot this weekend and try again in RL3. Thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/14/2005 2:05 PM On Monday, February 14, 2005 8:58 PM [GMT+1=CET], Dale Qualls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: s43xmail is in both rc3.d and rc5.d, s80sendmail only shows up in rc3.d. Should I whack the rc5.d/s80sendmail? YES ! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: xmail+fetchmail problems
I'd suggest installing one of the many webmail programs that work with xmail. I use UebiMiau and it is perfect. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/4/2005 3:02 AM Bill Healy wrote: Why do you want the mail to go to /var/spool/mail/fbiondi??? Bill Our goal (or better, what my chief wants) is to use xmail like a webmail too. At the same time he would download his mails when he is in office and when he is away without a notebook, can read them with a browser in an internet point. Filippo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] OT: SA and filter questions
I just upgraded to SA 3.02 and have a bad issue. If I manually run SA as a test (spamassassin -D -t testfile.txt output.txt) the proper version of SA (3.02) is used. If SA is run by my bsa_filter.pl then it's showing that the old version that I replaced (SA 2.61) is being used. I've tried doing a make clean from the 2.61 compiled install files but no use. Any clues how I can completely remove SA from the system so I can do a complete re-install of 3.02? Any suggestions are welcomed. Thanks! ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: OT: SA and filter questions
Many, many times. Also xmail and the server. It's killin' me. I just need to get 2.61 completely off this pig and it won't go away :) I tried make clean in the 2.61 source (had to re-run the perl Makefile.PL to be able to run make clean and it didn't help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/13/2005 3:20 PM Did you restart spamd? Dale Qualls said the following on 01/13/2005 04:11 PM: I just upgraded to SA 3.02 and have a bad issue. If I manually run SA as a test (spamassassin -D -t testfile.txt output.txt) the proper version of SA (3.02) is used. If SA is run by my bsa_filter.pl then it's showing that the old version that I replaced (SA 2.61) is being used. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] R: Re: OT: SA and filter questions
I just used a script to remove the cpan installs, tried running a sa test, was told no such file (which is what I hoped for). Compiled 3.0.2, tested with xmail and it still showed 2.61. Sheesh, I'm haunted by ghosts of SA!!! Used CPAN earlier with no luck, could try again when I get home though. Thanks for the input!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/13/2005 5:13 PM try upgrading via CPAN Dario -Messaggio originale- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di Dale Qualls Inviato: giovedì 13 gennaio 2005 23.45 A: xmail@xmailserver.org Oggetto: [xmail] Re: OT: SA and filter questions Many, many times. Also xmail and the server. It's killin' me. I just need to get 2.61 completely off this pig and it won't go away :) I tried make clean in the 2.61 source (had to re-run the perl Makefile.PL to be able to run make clean and it didn't help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/13/2005 3:20 PM Did you restart spamd? Dale Qualls said the following on 01/13/2005 04:11 PM: I just upgraded to SA 3.02 and have a bad issue. If I manually run SA as a test (spamassassin -D -t testfile.txt output.txt) the proper version of SA (3.02) is used. If SA is run by my bsa_filter.pl then it's showing that the old version that I replaced (SA 2.61) is being used. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: R: Re: OT: SA and filter questions
First of all, thanks for the help, this is what I've found.
The bsa_filter has #!/usr/bin/perl
perl -V gives only 5.8.6 info (as far as I can tell, it output a bunch
of stuff)
spamassassin -V gives: Spamassassin version 3.0.2 running on Perl
version 5.8.6
Your script (thanks much) gives:
Digest::SHA1 --2.10
HTML::Parser -- 3.45
HTML::Tagset -- 3.04
Mail::SpamAssassin -- 3.02
Perl -- 5.8.6
I'm at a complete loss. I can't find this 2.61 anywhere.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/13/2005 6:20 PM
Hi,
Have you checked that bsa_filter uses the same perl (in the #!shebang)
version as `which perl` ?
A small script to print out what modules and their versions are
installed:
(snip)
#!/usr/bin/perl
use ExtUtils::Installed;
my $instmod = ExtUtils::Installed-new();
foreach my $module ($instmod-modules()) {
my $version = $instmod-version($module) || ???;
print $module -- $version\n;
}
(snip)
Also check `perl -V` and look for older versions of perl installed
where the 2.61 version could be hiding..
I just used a script to remove the cpan installs, tried running a sa
test, was told no such file (which is what I hoped for). Compiled
3.0.2, tested with xmail and it still showed 2.61.
Sheesh, I'm haunted by ghosts of SA!!!
Used CPAN earlier with no luck, could try again when I get home
though.
-darren
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential
information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you
believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender
that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in
this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this
signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless
a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message.
**
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] FIXED???: OT: SA and filter questions
Are you guys ready for this? After uninstalling and re-installing so many times that my face turned blue, I believe it's now fixed. I'll keep an eye on it for a while to be sure. Here's what I did. I went and looked at the spamd and it had paths in it to /usr/share/spamassassin which is the older version. I did a whereis spamd and found a version in /usr/local/share/spamassassin. I fired up that version of spamd and all is well. Ain't that a bitch?? Thank you all for the great suggestions. I learned many great troubleshooting tips here. Again, thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/13/2005 8:41 PM Hi Along with what others suggested while I was writing this.. :) Is the bsa_filter script calling spamc or spamassassin ? Do `which spamassassin` and/or `which spamc` match the path (if any) in the bsa_filter script ? For instance, on my server: : which spamc /usr/local/bin/spamc : /usr/local/bin/spamc -V SpamAssassin Client version 3.0.2 : which spamassassin /usr/local/bin/spamassassin : /usr/local/bin/spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version 3.0.2 running on Perl version 5.8.5 If I had an old SA install in /usr/bin and the script was calling /usr/bin/spamassassin , it would be using the old version. If you look at the shebang line of `spamassassin` , it can sometimes point to a different perl version (on an old server of mine it shows #!/usr/bin/perl5.6.1 ). Might want to go that a check. If that sheds no new light on the problem, grep for it. grep -Ri spamassassin /usr mysearch.txt that will take awhile and be resource intensive, but it will find all files on /usr (I can't imagine it would be outside /usr) that have spamassassin in it, case insensitive. then you can open up mysearch.txt and look for a duplicate install. hope that helps -darren - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: filter error -5
I put it on this a.m., we'll keep an eye on it. Thanks! davidel@xmailserver.org 1/6/2005 2:30 PM On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Dale Qualls wrote: I'm seeing this error (filter error (-5)) in the /var/log/messages log on many messages. When this happens the server locks up and we have to reboot it, quickly ssh into it, kill xmail and spamd. Yesterday, while implementing the new filter features, I found an error triggered when a filter execution fails. In versions 1.21-pre04, I was freeing the filters strings array, and then log the operation, that was printing one of those strings (index 0). This might trigger crashes in case another thread immediately re-allocate the same location between the free and the log time. Try 1.21-pre04 ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] filter error -5
I'm seeing this error (filter error (-5)) in the /var/log/messages log on many messages. When this happens the server locks up and we have to reboot it, quickly ssh into it, kill xmail and spamd. spamd is running with an rss of 86M, seems kinda high to me. xmail 1.18 sa 2.63 clamav Pete Lindemann's filter The modified SA filter (that whacks spam, been using it for a long time). Any ideas? ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Need quick help please
RH8 Xmail 1.17 (I know it's old but it's always ran beautifully) bsa_filter.pl Pete's av filter The server began running seriously slow today. I think the xfs (font services for x) is hosed as after a reboot from an ssh session the gui won't start (changing initlevel to 3 in inittab won't allow the server to finish loading services, it hangs on a sendmail command, probably from the error). Xmail is running but mail isn't flowing. The SMTP logs show messages coming in but they're not being delivered to the mailboxes (I looked in the individual users cur, new and tmp folder and nothing shows up). Outbound messages appear to be sending but they're not getting outside of the box either. I've done a ls -R in the /spool but there aren't any files hiding in there. Thoughts? Advice? Help? Thanks! Dale ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Need quick help please
Davide: Thank goodness you're on. The .txt files are attached. Thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/17 11:34 AM On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Dale Qualls wrote: RH8 Xmail 1.17 (I know it's old but it's always ran beautifully) bsa_filter.pl Pete's av filter The server began running seriously slow today. I think the xfs (font services for x) is hosed as after a reboot from an ssh session the gui won't start (changing initlevel to 3 in inittab won't allow the server to finish loading services, it hangs on a sendmail command, probably from the error). Xmail is running but mail isn't flowing. The SMTP logs show messages coming in but they're not being delivered to the mailboxes (I looked in the individual users cur, new and tmp folder and nothing shows up). Outbound messages appear to be sending but they're not getting outside of the box either. I've done a ls -R in the /spool but there aren't any files hiding in there. Thoughts? Advice? Help? # netstat -t -u -n -a -p # vmstat -n 1 # top - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -- File: top.txt [H[2J[H[1m 11:37am up 1:02, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00[K 77 processes: 76 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped[K CPU states: 0.7% user, 1.4% system, 0.0% nice, 97.8% idle[K Mem: 505848K av, 227192K used, 278656K free, 0K shrd, 43044K buff[K Swap: 1044216K av, 0K used, 1044216K free 55744K cached[K [0m[K [7m PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND[K[0m 708 root 16 0 1468 1468 1320 S 0.9 0.2 0:00 sshd[K 2158 root 15 0 1032 1032 836 R 0.9 0.2 0:00 top[K 1 root 15 0 480 480 428 S 0.0 0.0 0:04 init[K 2 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 keventd[K 3 root 34 19 00 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 ksoftirqd_CPU0[K 4 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 kswapd[K 5 root 25 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 bdflush[K 6 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 kupdated[K 7 root 25 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 mdrecoveryd[K 11 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:02 kjournald[K 67 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 khubd[K 256 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald[K 257 root 16 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald[K 258 root 16 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald[K 259 root 16 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:04 kjournald[K 556 root 15 0 540 540 460 S 0.0 0.1 0:00 syslogd[K 560 root 15 0 428 428 376 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 klogd[K[J[6;1H[H[1m 11:37am up 1:02, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00[K 77 processes: 76 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped[K CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.9% system, 0.0% nice, 99.0% idle[K Mem: 505848K av, 227192K used, 278656K free, 0K shrd, 43056K buff[K Swap: 1044216K av, 0K used, 1044216K free 55748K cached[K [0m[K [7m PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND[K[0m 259 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.1 0.0 0:04 kjournald[K 2158 root 15 0 1036 1036 840 R 0.1 0.2 0:00 top[K 1 root 15 0 480 480 428 S 0.0 0.0 0:04 init[K 2 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 keventd[K 3 root 34 19 00 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 ksoftirqd_CPU0[K 4 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 kswapd[K 5 root 25 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 bdflush[K 6 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 kupdated[K 7 root 25 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 mdrecoveryd[K 11 root 16 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:02 kjournald[K 67 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0 0:00 khubd[K 256 root 15 0 00 0 SW0.0 0.0
[xmail] Re: Need quick help please
Not anymore. The xserver gui won't load but that's the only thing that's strange. Could the apparent issue with XFS (as in the fonts) be affecting anything? The smtp logs show incoming messages, they just don't go anywhere. The server accepts client connections to send mail and accepts them but they don't go anywhere either. The filters are firing as well and logging items (spam and such). I just can't figure where things are going. I'm going to disable filters for a second and try that but I doubt it'll do anything. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/17 11:51 AM On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Dale Qualls wrote: Davide: Thank goodness you're on. The .txt files are attached. It seems everything normal. You system is basically idle and XMail connections are there. Also, there's no unsual overload of connections. Does the system have a slow feeling even when used locally (no ssh)? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Need quick help please
Strange, I don't get the normal info when I telnet to 66.147.129.196 on port 25. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/17 11:51 AM On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Dale Qualls wrote: Davide: Thank goodness you're on. The .txt files are attached. It seems everything normal. You system is basically idle and XMail connections are there. Also, there's no unsual overload of connections. Does the system have a slow feeling even when used locally (no ssh)? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Upgrade procedures
Davide: Should I try going up to 1.20? Could something have gotten hosed in my xMail? Can I simply run the install as normal without it hosing my domains, users, filters etc?? How do I grab the executables only and drop them into /MailRoot/bin? ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help
Without grabbing and checking the manual for switches, those l's are lowercase L's, right? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/2/2004 11:51:53 PM Can anyone suggest any ideas to determine why XMail is not writing any log files? The xmail command line, as pasted from xmail executable in /etc/rc.d/init.d, is: XMAIL_CMD_LINE=-Sl -Ql -Mr 24 The XMail-related environment variables are pasted below: MAIL=/var/spool/mail/root MAILCHECK=60 MAIL_CMD_LINE= MAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot OSTYPE=linux-gnu PATH=/var/MailRoot/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin SHELL=/bin/bash XMAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot The OS is Linux version 2.4.7-10 (Red Hat 7.2) running XMail 1.8. Thanks for any suggestions. Hamid. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XMail Log Help
LOL, heck, I'm still running 1.7 on the xMail server that I help administer. 1.8 kept dying so I never went up from there :) I'm waiting for the long-awaited IMAP version (which I know is in production, I'm not trying to push it). Thanks Davide for all of your hard work! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/3/2004 1:19:19 AM On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone suggest any ideas to determine why XMail is not writing any log files? The xmail command line, as pasted from xmail executable in /etc/rc.d/init.d, is: XMAIL_CMD_LINE=-Sl -Ql -Mr 24 The XMail-related environment variables are pasted below: MAIL=/var/spool/mail/root MAILCHECK=60 MAIL_CMD_LINE= MAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot OSTYPE=linux-gnu PATH=/var/MailRoot/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin SHELL=/bin/bash XMAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot The OS is Linux version 2.4.7-10 (Red Hat 7.2) running XMail 1.8. Where are you looking for logs? PS: 1.8 is kinda old. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Spam Filters
Go to www.xmailserver.org, there are two that should run fine since you're probably running Perl for Win as well. I've used them both but currently use the bsa_filter.pl so forwarding/deleting can be done. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/3/2004 11:16:17 AM Does any one have a working SpamAssassin filter for windows? Any help would be appreciated. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. ** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] cannot lstat `/var/MailRoot/spool/14.....
Hi gang! I thought I had a perfectly working xmail system until I started looking at the logs. Apparently none of my filters were working (using Pete Lindemans AV w/clam and Beau Cox's version of Drake's spamassassin filter). I've got the AV working now, but not the SA filter but that's not my major worry. Check out the logs. In debug mode I get this: rm: cannot lstat `/var/MailRoot/spool/10/0/mess/1090419338419.213019.NS2.report': No such file or directory Filter run: Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Filter = /var/MailRoot/filters/checkvirus.pl Retcode = 7 Filter run: Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Filter = /var/MailRoot/filters/bsa_filter.pl Retcode = 2 Retcode = 2ender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Filter = the antivirus log file is created but is empty (when no virus is found) and the spam log is never even created. When I send the eicar test virus through the server I get this: SMAIL local SMTP = pmnhg.net From = [EMAIL PROTECTED] To = [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP client exit [10.5.10.113] rm: cannot lstat `/var/MailRoot/spool/14/3/mess/1090419599045.221211.NS2.report': No such file or directory Filter run: Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Filter = /var/MailRoot/filters/checkvirus.pl Retcode = 20 The av filter is working fine and identifies the test virus. I'm most concerned about the cannot lstat blah blah blah line. I'm pretty sure I can work myself through getting the bsa_filter working. Any takers? P.S. Has anyone ever gotten a good attachment blocking filter going? The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] How do you combat forged ip address messages?
Hi all! I've gotten this reply back a couple of times from various recipients of messages that my users have sent. I'm not sure where they are getting the idea that my IP address may be forged. I see the mail for the recipient is being passed through securemail.forward.net, so maybe the easy answer is that they are doing something with it. Any thoughts? RH8.0 Xmail 1.17 (I know, but it runs so well that I don't want to upgrade until 2.x comes out :) Thanks! ===8==Original message text=== [00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied. IP name possibly forged [CHANGED FOR PUBLIC POSTING-this is the true internet IP address of my mailserver]] [01] Error sending message [1089239876221.3821518875.linuxmail.MYDOMAIN.org] from [MYDOMAIN.org]. ID:S31CD1 Mail From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rcpt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Server:securemail.forward.net [216.229.141.234] [02] The reason of the delivery failure was: 550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied. IP name possibly forged [CHANGED FOR PUBLIC POSTING-this is the true internet IP address of my mailserver] The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Password incorrect
Are you using [EMAIL PROTECTED] for your username? X-mail likes it that way. Beau: Please contact me off-list if you can, I have a question about your spam filter. Thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/8/2004 12:21:41 PM Hi - I am running 1.20 on Linux, and I have a problem. I get '-ERR Password incorrect' on trying to get mail from _any_ account ( the server is still receiving mail from outside, tne MailDir/new direcories are being loaded ). I have - * Confirmed my passwords with CtrlClnt * Reconfigured my mail client. * finally, used 'telnet mydomain.com 110' and tried user , pass , and get -ERR Password incorrect every time for every user. I am currently using reading my incomming mail by editing the files in the new directories. I have not knowingly changed any configuration. I am stumped. Aloha = Beau; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: How do you combat forged ip address messages?
Yep, HeloDomain is set in server.tab I'll check the PTR records, but I think they should be fine. Thanks Davide!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/8/2004 1:51:03 PM On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Dale Qualls wrote: Hi all! I've gotten this reply back a couple of times from various recipients of messages that my users have sent. I'm not sure where they are getting the idea that my IP address may be forged. I see the mail for the recipient is being passed through securemail.forward.net, so maybe the easy answer is that they are doing something with it. Any thoughts? Maybe they test the EHLO domain name against your PTR record, and it does not match. Do you have HeloDomain set in server.tab? RH8.0 Xmail 1.17 (I know, but it runs so well that I don't want to upgrade until 2.x comes out :) But you're losing 1.20, possibly one of the best XMail versions ever :-) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: How do you combat forged ip address messages?
Heck, I thought it was supposed to be there :) I'll remove it now, thanks much!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/8/2004 2:17:25 PM On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Dale Qualls wrote: Yep, HeloDomain is set in server.tab You should be just fine if you remove it. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AW: [ANNOUNCE] bsa_filter.pl
okay, silly question, but where should I insert this in the script?
I hate not knowing how to code.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/27/2004 8:27:17 AM
The final one:
#-
# MOD.start
#-
# pass rest to spamc
#MOD my $checkedEmail=3D`spamc -f $tmpFile`;
my $delay =3D 0;
my $maxdelay =3D 90;
my $checkedEmail;=09
do {
# Call spamc
$checkedEmail =3D '';
print *** spamc delayed: $delay sec.\n if ($delay 0)
($DEBUG
=3D=3D 1);
sleep($delay);
open2(*SPAMC_R,*SPAMC_W,'spamc -f');
=09
# Submit message
open(FILE, $tmpFile);
my $input =3D do{local $/;FILE};
close(FILE);
print SPAMC_W $input;
close(SPAMC_W);
# Get result
$checkedEmail =3D do{local $/;SPAMC_R};
close(SPAMC_R);
=09
# Restart if spamd wasn't reached
$delay +=3D 1;# inc 1 second
last if $delay $maxdelay;
} while($checkedEmail !~ /X-Spam-Level/gmi);
#-
# MOD.end
#-
$maxdelay should be adapted to XMail's -QT parameter, if further
filters
follow.
Thanks,
Harald
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Harald
Schneider
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2004 14:47
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [xmail] AW: Re: AW: AW: AW: [ANNOUNCE] bsa_filter.pl
=20
=20
That seems to work and saves precious keystrokes.
(You see, I'm getting old, and I beleive that each person
only has a certain number of keystrokes in their lifetime; I
try to save each one I can so I don't run out ;) ).
=20
Hehhehe ... that's very wise :)
=20
Also, 1000 retries at an average of 500 x 5 seconds each
is 1000 x 500 x 5 =3D3D 2,500,000 seconds which is about 29 days!
I think I'll drop the retry count down a bit.
=20
I see .. this was a quick shot, also meant to save time ;)
One more thing: $tempFile hold the file's content. In the original
=3D
script it
holds the filename.
But I'm sure when you are done, we got some good compressed Perl
code.
=20
Read you,
Harald
=20
=20
=20
=3D20
Aloha =3D3D Beau;
=3D20
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail
in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=3D20
=20
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential
information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you
believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender
that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in
this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this
signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless
a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: In search of the perfect Spam filter script
I can absolutely wait! Thanks Beau!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/25/2004 5:59:59 PM On Tuesday 25 May 2004 03:42 am, Dale Qualls wrote: At one time a user named Toby had a modified sa_filter.pl script that would mark up and delete messages over a score of 10. Toby had shared the modified portions of his code with the list. Toby: Would you be willing to share the whole script file with me/us? With all of my tweaking I can't get the code that you posted to work (I suck at perl/programming in general). Or, does anyone else has a spam filter working that performs the following: score 5 DELIVER TO USER score 5-10 forward to an administrative account (to be reviewed and whitelisted/forwarded if ham or blacklisted/deleted if spam) score 20 Trash it I know that Don was going to work on something similar, but he had also told me that a lot of the scripting was in the listserv. I've searched (only because I've lost Don's e-mail pointing me to it) and can't seem to find what I'm looking for. Any/all help would be appreciated. Dale - Can you hold out for a few days? I am working on just what you want (modifying Don Drake's sa_filter.pl). I should be done testing before this weekend and will post it here. Aloha = Beau; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: In search of the perfect Spam filter script
I'd love to take a look at it Adrian, that would be great! If you don't want to post it you can send it to me off-list. Thanks much! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/25/2004 10:14:19 PM Hi Dale. I've got a BASH (Linux) script if that's useful. Currently using the weighting numbers from our ISP so might need some tweaking. And it drops questionable messages and higher to a dir for checking, though forwarding could be arranged easily enough. And the low high limits are configurable. Adrian Hicks On Tuesday 25 May 2004 9:42 pm, you wrote: At one time a user named Toby had a modified sa_filter.pl script that would mark up and delete messages over a score of 10. Toby had shared the modified portions of his code with the list. Toby: Would you be willing to share the whole script file with me/us? With all of my tweaking I can't get the code that you posted to work (I suck at perl/programming in general). Or, does anyone else has a spam filter working that performs the following: score 5 DELIVER TO USER score 5-10 forward to an administrative account (to be reviewed and whitelisted/forwarded if ham or blacklisted/deleted if spam) score 20 Trash it I know that Don was going to work on something similar, but he had also told me that a lot of the scripting was in the listserv. I've searched (only because I've lost Don's e-mail pointing me to it) and can't seem to find what I'm looking for. Any/all help would be appreciated. The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses.] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: [ANNOUNCE] bsa_filter.pl
Checking it out now, thanks SO MUCH!!! Beau E. Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/26/2004 12:46:39 PM I am pleased to announce the first public release of 'bsa_filter.pl' - a SpamAssassin xmail filter written in perl. The script is a modification/upgrade of Don Drake's sa_filter.pl. Please be aware that this script is 'beta' and it should be carefully tested before being thrown into production. The script and documentation may be found at: http://xmail.beaucox.com Davide - can you put a link on your site pointing to my site with a description of something like: a href=http://xmail.beaucox.com/;bsa_filter.pl/a - a perl SpamAssassin filter with configurable spam message forwarding and/or trashing. A snippet of the documentation: NAME bsa_filter.pl - an xmail SpamAssassin filter. DESCRIPTION bsa_filter.pl is an xmail mail server filter to process incoming messages through SpamAssassin. It is based on Don Drakes's script - sa_filter.pl, version 1.3. The following enhancements to his work were made: Rewritten using perl oo package/class This was mainly done to make intra-module communication easier. Configurable forwarding Spam messages may be forwarded to an administrative email account for review/blacklisting/whitelisting/etc. based on a settable spam score threshold. Configurable trashing Spam messages above a settable spam score may be summarily trashed. Enhanced log The spam log has been enhanced: additional fields have been added. PREREQUSITES The follwing modules should be installed: xmail A running xmail mail server. See the CONFIGURATION section below for changes that must be made to filter exit codes for older versions. Mail::SpamAssassin I have tested only with version 2.63; the filter should/may work with earlier versions that do not have major operational changes. Net::SMTP Found in perl module libnet; I use libnet 1.18. CONFIGURATION Aloha = Beau; The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] In search of the perfect Spam filter script
At one time a user named Toby had a modified sa_filter.pl script that would mark up and delete messages over a score of 10. Toby had shared the modified portions of his code with the list. Toby: Would you be willing to share the whole script file with me/us? With all of my tweaking I can't get the code that you posted to work (I suck at perl/programming in general). Or, does anyone else has a spam filter working that performs the following: score 5 DELIVER TO USER score 5-10 forward to an administrative account (to be reviewed and whitelisted/forwarded if ham or blacklisted/deleted if spam) score 20 Trash it I know that Don was going to work on something similar, but he had also told me that a lot of the scripting was in the listserv. I've searched (only because I've lost Don's e-mail pointing me to it) and can't seem to find what I'm looking for. Any/all help would be appreciated. The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in the message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
I guess I'm not trying to stifle it, but like everyone here, I have my = opinions. I do have to ask how many times does Davide have to say no before people = realize that he's not going to make the change? People may not be being = ungrateful, but beating this dead horse isn't going to make him change it. = It's HIS software (so his decision), yes it's open source, but that = doesn't change the fact that he's the writer/maintainer. Open source also = allowsfor people to change the code any way they see fit, including the = defaults for the smtprelay.tab file. If you're not happy with it change it, isn't THAT the beauty of open = source? If you think the documentation isn't up to snuff, write a howto. There's = one person on this list that writes a great Beginners Guide to... and = even he says to change it. It all comes down to the fact that you can = write it in 72 point text and people still won't RTFM. Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/31/04 10:47PM On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 12:59, Dale Qualls wrote: Okay, color me stupid, but is it so tough to empty the darned smtprelay.t= ab=3D file? no - but I agree it's easy to miss. Even if it was left the way it was and there was a file named IMPORTANT.txt in the root directory of the archive that would suffice IMHO. I have always thought a little more documentation (or a little more well targeted documentation) was appropriate. I'm amazed at everyone bitching over a great product that no one pays = any =3D money for. Yeah this is how software improves isn't it, by everyone keeping their mouths shut. Nobody is being ungrateful, we are just raising issues and offering solutions. I would rather have people email me their concerns about the software I develop than not finding out about them till months later. This is the beauty of open source - the ability to actually have your feedback listened to and acted on. Why you are trying to stifle this valid conversation I do not know. Cheers, Will. --=20 William Denniss - will@ http://tanksoftware.com/=20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
rant Okay, color me stupid, but is it so tough to empty the darned smtprelay.tab= file? I'm amazed at everyone bitching over a great product that no one pays any = money for. I agree that spam is an issue, I block over a million pieces a month, but = for pete's sake people need to take a little responsibility for their own = server and configure the damned thing properly. Leave the poor guy alone (so he can work on 2.0 :-). If you don't like = having to actually configure your own server then go find something else = to use nowhere near as stable as XMail and that you have to pay for. /rant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/31/04 07:52PM On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Orion Productions wrote: I really hope you'll reconsider your decision! :-) I did - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: any attach.pl (attach filter) gurus out there?
But, remember, I don't think anything is wrong with Peter's filter, I just = didn't know what the returned errors meant. The filter is catching all = virii with zero issues. Thanks!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/04 12:30AM Yes, you are wright. If you have downloaded from the=20 ftp://xmail.homelinux.net then you have the latest one. About the error on Peter's av script...Peter where are you, please help. Sasa Dale Qualls pravi: There isn't a version in the attach.pl or the attach.conf, any clue = where =3D I'd look? =20 xmail 1.18 clamav Peter's AV filter latest MIME::Lite =20 I'll cross post now, thanks for the info! =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: any attach.pl (attach filter) gurus out there?
Yep, you're missing the entire text from my original message. =20 This post isn't about Peter's filter, it's about the attach filter from = xmail.homelinux.net. In my debug it also showed some av filter errors but = it's working just fine Here's my original message to straighten things out :) Dale Qualls pravi: I've put in Igor Reno's attach filter but I'm not having any luck. It's = =3D returning a 2, but that doesn't mean a bunch to me :) Here's the =3D messages that I see in debug mode and nothing is going into the attach = log =3D files (since it isn't seeing the test .zip file as an attachment). My = =3D att.txt has this in it: =20 rar|exe|zar|zip application/x-msdownload|application/access =20 Here's what I'm seeing in the debug: =20 SMAIL local SMTP =3D3D therootdomain.org From =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] m TO =3D =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP client exit (12.blah.blah.blah) Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D3D=3D3D) at /var/MailRoot/filt= ers/ch=3D eckvirus.pl line 142. Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D3D=3D3D) at /var/MailRoot/filt= ers/ch=3D eckvirus.pl line 233. Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D3D=3D3D) at /var/MailRoot/filt= ers/ch=3D eckvirus.pl line 303. rm: cannot lstat '/var/MailRoot/spool/22/14/mess/1078367073633.229403.lin= ux=3D mail.localdomain.report': No such file or directory Filter run: Sender =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] omain.=3D com Filter =3D3D /var/MailRoot/filters/checkvirus.pl Retcode =3D3D 7 Filter run: Sender =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] omain.=3D com Filter =3D3D /var/MailRoot/filters/attach.pl Retcode =3D3D 2 =20 The .zip file that I'm testing with comes right through. =20 Any thoughts? =20 Also, I'm concerned about the checkvirus.pl errors (although it's = stopping =3D virii right and left, guess it isn't anything bad. =20 Any thoughts on the attach.pl issue? =20 Thanks gang!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/04 07:41AM Well maybe I am missing something... I am using peters script and fprot and from what I can tell all bagel infected mails are being caught. I get about 100 a day that show up in the logs as being caught on my system.. Original Message From: Dale Qualls [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:33 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: any attach.pl (attach filter) gurus out there? But, remember, I don't think anything is wrong with Peter's filter, I just =3D didn't know what the returned errors meant. The filter is catching all =3D virii with zero issues. Thanks!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/04 12:30AM Yes, you are wright. If you have downloaded from the=3D20 ftp://xmail.homelinux.net then you have the latest one. About the error on Peter's av script...Peter where are you, please help. Sasa Dale Qualls pravi: There isn't a version in the attach.pl or the attach.conf, any clue =3D where =3D3D I'd look? =3D20 xmail 1.18 clamav Peter's AV filter latest MIME::Lite =3D20 I'll cross post now, thanks for the info! =3D20 =3D20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: any attach.pl (attach filter) gurus out there?
It's ver 1.9. It's still catching virii just fine though Peter. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/04 03:02PM Dale Qualls wrote: Here's what I'm seeing in the debug: =20 SMAIL local SMTP =3D3D therootdomain.org From =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] m TO =3D =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP client exit (12.blah.blah.blah) Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D3D=3D3D) at /var/MailRoot/filt= ers/ch=3D eckvirus.pl line 142. Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D3D=3D3D) at /var/MailRoot/filt= ers/ch=3D eckvirus.pl line 233. Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D3D=3D3D) at /var/MailRoot/filt= ers/ch=3D eckvirus.pl line 303. What version of the Checkvirus script are you using? These lines should=20 never occur. This is definitly wrong. --=20 Groeten, Peter Are w#e b.ug free [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com=20 - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org=20 - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 9 days, 22 hours and 42 minutes, 0 users logged = in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] any attach.pl (attach filter) gurus out there?
I've put in Igor Reno's attach filter but I'm not having any luck. It's = returning a 2, but that doesn't mean a bunch to me :) Here's the = messages that I see in debug mode and nothing is going into the attach log = files (since it isn't seeing the test .zip file as an attachment). My = att.txt has this in it: rar|exe|zar|zip application/x-msdownload|application/access Here's what I'm seeing in the debug: SMAIL local SMTP =3D therootdomain.org From =3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO = =3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP client exit (12.blah.blah.blah) Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D=3D) at /var/MailRoot/filters/ch= eckvirus.pl line 142. Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D=3D) at /var/MailRoot/filters/ch= eckvirus.pl line 233. Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D=3D) at /var/MailRoot/filters/ch= eckvirus.pl line 303. rm: cannot lstat '/var/MailRoot/spool/22/14/mess/1078367073633.229403.linux= mail.localdomain.report': No such file or directory Filter run: Sender =3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient =3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] com Filter =3D /var/MailRoot/filters/checkvirus.pl Retcode =3D 7 Filter run: Sender =3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient =3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] com Filter =3D /var/MailRoot/filters/attach.pl Retcode =3D 2 The .zip file that I'm testing with comes right through. Any thoughts? Also, I'm concerned about the checkvirus.pl errors (although it's stopping = virii right and left, guess it isn't anything bad. Any thoughts on the attach.pl issue? Thanks gang!! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: any attach.pl (attach filter) gurus out there?
There isn't a version in the attach.pl or the attach.conf, any clue where = I'd look? xmail 1.18 clamav Peter's AV filter latest MIME::Lite I'll cross post now, thanks for the info! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/04/04 01:13PM Which version do you have installed? Please post this on the xmailforum=20 also, Igor is reading it constantly ( http://xmailforum.homelinux.net ) --Sasa Dale Qualls pravi: I've put in Igor Reno's attach filter but I'm not having any luck. It's = =3D returning a 2, but that doesn't mean a bunch to me :) Here's the =3D messages that I see in debug mode and nothing is going into the attach = log =3D files (since it isn't seeing the test .zip file as an attachment). My = =3D att.txt has this in it: =20 rar|exe|zar|zip application/x-msdownload|application/access =20 Here's what I'm seeing in the debug: =20 SMAIL local SMTP =3D3D therootdomain.org From =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] m TO =3D =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP client exit (12.blah.blah.blah) Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D3D=3D3D) at /var/MailRoot/filt= ers/ch=3D eckvirus.pl line 142. Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D3D=3D3D) at /var/MailRoot/filt= ers/ch=3D eckvirus.pl line 233. Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D3D=3D3D) at /var/MailRoot/filt= ers/ch=3D eckvirus.pl line 303. rm: cannot lstat '/var/MailRoot/spool/22/14/mess/1078367073633.229403.lin= ux=3D mail.localdomain.report': No such file or directory Filter run: Sender =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] omain.=3D com Filter =3D3D /var/MailRoot/filters/checkvirus.pl Retcode =3D3D 7 Filter run: Sender =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient =3D3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] omain.=3D com Filter =3D3D /var/MailRoot/filters/attach.pl Retcode =3D3D 2 =20 The .zip file that I'm testing with comes right through. =20 Any thoughts? =20 Also, I'm concerned about the checkvirus.pl errors (although it's = stopping =3D virii right and left, guess it isn't anything bad. =20 Any thoughts on the attach.pl issue? =20 Thanks gang!! =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active
Have you tried putting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4.1 in the xmail script? It may need to be LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4.1 I don't recall which. This is a known RH9 issue. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/04 12:10PM I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with XMail staying active. It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a day. XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email messages. I have checked the queue and I didn't see anything unusual in it. Also, sometimes XMail will act like it's working fine but when I send to a specific user it will not write anything out to the mailbox directory until I restart XMail. This is very strange, and it has happened on more than one occasion to two different people. If anyone has any ideas what is going on I'd love to hear it. Here is the command line switches I have in: -Pl -Sl -Ql -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -F. =20 Thanks Chad =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active
Follow Davide's exact wording. He's the MAN!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/04 01:10PM Do I put it in the script the way Davide had it. export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4? or do I just do LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4 ? or do I have to specify 2.4.1? Chad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Larkman Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar problem. - Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote: I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with XMail staying active. It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a day. XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email messages. I have checked the queue and I didn't see anything unusual in it. Also, sometimes XMail will act like it's working fine but when I send to a specific user it will not write anything out to the mailbox directory until I restart XMail. This is very strange, and it has happened on more than one occasion to two different people. If anyone has any ideas what is going on I'd love to hear it. Here is the command line switches I have in: -Pl -Sl -Ql -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -F. In your /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail add: export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4 - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] attachment filtering
Besides MimeFilter, is anyone aware of a filter to block certain file = attachments such as .dll, .wsh, .bat, .pif and .exe?? Thanks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: attachment filtering
sweet, thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/17/04 11:38AM Yep, get it at ftp://ftp.xmail.homelinux.net . Name is attach2. Sasa Dale Qualls pravi: Besides MimeFilter, is anyone aware of a filter to block certain file = =3D attachments such as .dll, .wsh, .bat, .pif and .exe?? =20 Thanks! =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MyDoom sneaking through
Unfortunately the messages that got through were quarantined and the users = always empty their quarantinedarn it. Couldn't look for the tag in = the header. Now another bad one hasn't come through (that we've been told = about). Even tried to restore from the Norton backup but it couldn't = restore the infected message so I couldn't see squat. I'll offer this info though to see if it helps figure this out (although I = believe one person said yesterday that they've experienced this as well = with the huge MyDoom load). A few days ago I requested info regarding how to upgrade to 1.18, sounded = simple enough so I upgraded the backup server (which is ONLY a backup = server, it only hosts the main domain for which only a postmaster account = is setup).=20 When users on the primary server began receiving virii, I checked the = backup server just for giggles and found that the anti-virus filter hadn't = logged any entries since 2/9. The SMTP didn't log anything on 2/10 but = did on 2/11. I shut down the backup yesterday (when these virus things = started happening) to see if additonal virus were passed through on the = Primary, after I had shut down the backup (or so it seems) there weren't = any more virii received by the Primary. Checking the smtp log on the = backup server (checked it this morning after removing the connection to = the network) for 2/12 though didn't show any messages passed to the users = that received the infected messages. Dead end here I assume. I fired this server up today with the nic unplugged and the antivirus = filter fired off against items that must have been spooled. First time = it's activated since 2/9. Now, for the other twist. I upgraded the primary server last night to = 1.18. After doing so, the SMTP server accepted messages from the internet = and clients could send messages but all sent messages stayed in the = queue's. Even if sending a message to someone on the same domain. The = client could connect via POP3 but would say no messages found. I put = 1.17 back into operatioin and all of the messages were cleared from the = queue and delivered properly. I upgraded both servers exactly like this: had xmail-1.18.tar.gz in /usr/src/xmail118 from the /usr/src/xmail118 directory ran=20 #gunzip xmail-1.18.tar.gz #tar -xsvf xmail-1.18.tar # cd xmail-1.18 #makefile -f Makefile.lnx after compiling I went to /var and ran #cp -a MailRoot /var/MailRoot.1.17 # cp MailRoot/bin # mv XMail Xmail.1.17 # mv CtrlClnt CtrlClnt.1.17 # mv sendmail sendmail.1.17 #mv MkUsers MkUsers.117 # mv XMCrypt XMCrypt.1.17 # cd //usr/src/xmail118/xmail-1.18 # cp XMail CtrlClnt sendmail XMCrypt MkUsers /var/MailRoot/bin/ I then restarted xmail with #/etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail start This is correct, no? Another strange thing, I've found that using /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail stop = with 1.18 does not stop xmail. It says Stopping XMail server: but it = just hangs there. This happened on both primary and backup. =20 I switched both back to 1.17 and both servers can shutdown xmail properly = again. I'm going to put the backup server back on the network and see if we get = any virii through today. If all is well through the weekend I may put = 1.18 back onto the backup server to see if I can re-create the virus = infections. Of course, this could all just be a strange coincidence, we all know I'm = not even close to being any good with Linux/XMail or knowing how/why = things happen, but I'll say this much, I'm sure learning a bunch :) Thanks all! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/12/04 12:53PM Dale Qualls schreef: Is there a limit to the number of times the av-filter can be called and = =3D will mail bypass it if it's busy or runs out of threads? =20 In the last couple of days we've have many copies of mydoom get through = to =3D the user (where the desktop AV stopped it) but we're still having copies = =3D caught by the av-filter. =20 Is anyone else experiencing this? =20 Thx! =20 RH 8.0 on P4 2.4GHZ with tons o' RAM (could be a 2.6, I don't recall) xmail 1.17 clamav Peter's av-filter Only a couple hundred of messages per day. I have never saw this behaviour here. Since the script is using random=20 path's for working I don't see what can go wrong at this time. Is the=20 X-AV-Scanned: header in the infected message? --=20 Groeten, Peter Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else. - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com=20 - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org=20 - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 34 days, 21 hours and 48 minutes, 0 users logged = in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL
[xmail] Re: MyDoom sneaking through
may put = =3D 1.18 back onto the backup server to see if I can re-create the virus =3D infections. Of course, this could all just be a strange coincidence, we all know I'm =3D not even close to being any good with Linux/XMail or knowing how/why =3D things happen, but I'll say this much, I'm sure learning a bunch :) Thanks all! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/12/04 12:53PM Dale Qualls schreef: Is there a limit to the number of times the av-filter can be called and =3D =3D3D will mail bypass it if it's busy or runs out of threads? =3D20 In the last couple of days we've have many copies of mydoom get through =3D to =3D3D the user (where the desktop AV stopped it) but we're still having = copies =3D =3D3D caught by the av-filter. =3D20 Is anyone else experiencing this? =3D20 Thx! =3D20 RH 8.0 on P4 2.4GHZ with tons o' RAM (could be a 2.6, I don't recall) xmail 1.17 clamav Peter's av-filter Only a couple hundred of messages per day. I have never saw this behaviour here. Since the script is using = random=3D20 path's for working I don't see what can go wrong at this time. Is = the=3D20 X-AV-Scanned: header in the infected message? --=3D20 Groeten, Peter Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else. - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com=3D20=20 - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org=3D20=20 - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 34 days, 21 hours and 48 minutes, 0 users logged =3D in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
